Failed to fetch jessie backports repositoryThe repository jessie-backports Release does no longer have a Release fileW: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 151.101.140.204 80]How to work around “Release file expired” problem on a local mirrorI can't use or find the google debian unstable/sid repositoryHow to update Debian kernel to latest in backportsLinux Mint Rebecca - Packages 404 Not Foundapt pinning priority restricted`apt update` failed on Debian LinuxUnable to find expected entry 'main/binary-mipsel/Packages' in Release fileI installed the kernel and some drivers from jessie-backports. Should I leave the backports repo in /etc/apt/sources.list?How to install a package from a repository which is missing some architectures?How to get rid of a PPA?Debian 9 stretch-backports signature couldn't be verified
Do the temporary hit points from the Battlerager barbarian's Reckless Abandon stack if I make multiple attacks on my turn?
when is out of tune ok?
Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle
Is there a problem with hiding "forgot password" until it's needed?
Is expanding the research of a group into machine learning as a PhD student risky?
How long to clear the 'suck zone' of a turbofan after start is initiated?
Can the discrete variable be a negative number?
Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?
Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?
How to Reset Passwords on Multiple Websites Easily?
A Rare Riley Riddle
Hostile work environment after whistle-blowing on coworker and our boss. What do I do?
Is HostGator storing my password in plaintext?
How easy is it to start Magic from scratch?
Term for the "extreme-extension" version of a straw man fallacy?
Trouble understanding the speech of overseas colleagues
Sequence of Tenses: Translating the subjunctive
What is the difference between "behavior" and "behaviour"?
Why does indent disappear in lists?
Is this apparent Class Action settlement a spam message?
Large drywall patch supports
What does 算不上 mean in 算不上太美好的日子?
Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?
How do we know the LHC results are robust?
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
The repository jessie-backports Release does no longer have a Release fileW: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 151.101.140.204 80]How to work around “Release file expired” problem on a local mirrorI can't use or find the google debian unstable/sid repositoryHow to update Debian kernel to latest in backportsLinux Mint Rebecca - Packages 404 Not Foundapt pinning priority restricted`apt update` failed on Debian LinuxUnable to find expected entry 'main/binary-mipsel/Packages' in Release fileI installed the kernel and some drivers from jessie-backports. Should I leave the backports repo in /etc/apt/sources.list?How to install a package from a repository which is missing some architectures?How to get rid of a PPA?Debian 9 stretch-backports signature couldn't be verified
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
add a comment |
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
yesterday
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
20 hours ago
add a comment |
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
debian repository
New contributor
New contributor
edited yesterday
GAD3R
27.5k1858114
27.5k1858114
New contributor
asked yesterday
user12345user12345
23624
23624
New contributor
New contributor
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
yesterday
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
20 hours ago
add a comment |
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
yesterday
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
20 hours ago
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
yesterday
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
yesterday
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
20 hours ago
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
20 hours ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
yesterday
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
yesterday
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
yesterday
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
yesterday
add a comment |
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
16 hours ago
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
8 hours ago
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
add a comment |
protected by Jeff Schaller♦ 17 hours ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
yesterday
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
yesterday
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
yesterday
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
yesterday
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org
instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt
doesn’t support the check-valid-until
flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates
repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates
repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf
:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
edited 9 hours ago
answered yesterday
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24405482
178k24405482
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
yesterday
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
yesterday
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
yesterday
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports
.
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
Have found that subsequentapt
commands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
yesterday
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.conf
should work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
yesterday
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
yesterday
1
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.
jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still on security.debian.org
.– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.
jessie-updates
doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still on security.debian.org
.– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided on
security.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, so jessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes for jessie-backports
.– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@Ian no, security updates are provided on
security.debian.org
, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, so jessie-updates
is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes for jessie-backports
.– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
2
2
Have found that subsequent
apt
commands also seem to require -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.– sumitsu
yesterday
Have found that subsequent
apt
commands also seem to require -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false
(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.– sumitsu
yesterday
1
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that in
apt.conf
should work too (see my update).– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
@sumitsu thanks, setting that in
apt.conf
should work too (see my update).– Stephen Kitt
yesterday
|
show 9 more comments
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
yesterday
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
yesterday
add a comment |
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
yesterday
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
yesterday
add a comment |
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list
.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update
.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
edited yesterday
New contributor
answered yesterday
inostiainostia
1614
1614
New contributor
New contributor
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
yesterday
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
yesterday
add a comment |
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]
injessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the-o
flag when runningapt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-o
when running apt.
– inostia
yesterday
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-o
flag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
yesterday
1
1
it didn't work when i only included
[check-valid-until=no]
in jessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the -o
flag when running apt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from *.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including -o
when running apt.– inostia
yesterday
it didn't work when i only included
[check-valid-until=no]
in jessie-backports.list
as the other answer suggested, i had to add the -o
flag when running apt-update
to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from *.list
configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including -o
when running apt.– inostia
yesterday
1
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the
-o
flag issue if you set it in apt.conf
– inostia
yesterday
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the
-o
flag issue if you set it in apt.conf
– inostia
yesterday
add a comment |
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
16 hours ago
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
8 hours ago
add a comment |
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
16 hours ago
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
8 hours ago
add a comment |
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main
from /etc/apt/sources.list
.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
New contributor
answered 19 hours ago
henadzithenadzit
1611
1611
New contributor
New contributor
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
16 hours ago
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
8 hours ago
add a comment |
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
16 hours ago
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
8 hours ago
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
16 hours ago
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
16 hours ago
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
8 hours ago
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
8 hours ago
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
New contributor
answered yesterday
Glen C.Glen C.
112
112
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Jeff Schaller♦ 17 hours ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
yesterday
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
20 hours ago