Help with Seemingly Hopeless Double IntegralHelp with evaluating an integralPoisson Integral FormulaDefine a plane with double integralNasty double integral with lots of exponentialsHelp! How to solve this integral?Double Integral with polar substitution?Simplifying a double integral to a single integralAsymptotics of a double integralDouble integral $ iintln(sin(u-7v)) ,du,dv$A triple definite integral from Cartesian coordinates to Spherical coordinates. Help!
Purchasing a ticket for someone else in another country?
How do I extract a value from a time formatted value in excel?
Opposite of a diet
What does "I’d sit this one out, Cap," imply or mean in the context?
Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm
Gears on left are inverse to gears on right?
Is `x >> pure y` equivalent to `liftM (const y) x`
Is a stroke of luck acceptable after a series of unfavorable events?
Risk of infection at the gym?
Applicability of Single Responsibility Principle
Where does the Z80 processor start executing from?
What is the intuitive meaning of having a linear relationship between the logs of two variables?
Crossing the line between justified force and brutality
Unreliable Magic - Is it worth it?
Increase performance creating Mandelbrot set in python
Did Dumbledore lie to Harry about how long he had James Potter's invisibility cloak when he was examining it? If so, why?
How does it work when somebody invests in my business?
How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?
Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?
How did Arya survive the stabbing?
Type int? vs type int
Integer addition + constant, is it a group?
How does buying out courses with grant money work?
Short story about space worker geeks who zone out by 'listening' to radiation from stars
Help with Seemingly Hopeless Double Integral
Help with evaluating an integralPoisson Integral FormulaDefine a plane with double integralNasty double integral with lots of exponentialsHelp! How to solve this integral?Double Integral with polar substitution?Simplifying a double integral to a single integralAsymptotics of a double integralDouble integral $ iintln(sin(u-7v)) ,du,dv$A triple definite integral from Cartesian coordinates to Spherical coordinates. Help!
$begingroup$
I hate to be that guy to just post an integration problem and ask how to solve it so I'll give a little relevant info
Okay, so I'm working on a physics project and my professor proposed that the following double integral could potentially solve a problem that I've used an alternative method to solve:
$$I=int_0^piint_0^rhofract^2sinphileft(tcosphi-dright)left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-dright)^2right]^3/2;dt dphi$$
$rho$ is an arbitrary, strictly positive real constant
$d$ is a real constant that satisfies $d>rho$
This integral's value could provide immense insight into fields of uniform, solid spherical objects, so it's actually pretty important for my work.
After some quick attempts to simplify, I decided to try some integral calculators with set values. Needless to say, the result after the first integral seemed so hopeless that I couldn't imagine simplifying and integrating again--not to mention then generalising constant inputs to their original variable form.
However, there is a strong likelihood that $I$ simplifies to one of the following two solutions:
$$text1.This solution comes from inverse square laws$$
$$I=frac1d^2$$
$$text2. This solution comes from a separate computation that I did (integrals below)$$
$$I=left(1-fracrho^25d^2right)left[frac32rho^2+frac3(rho^2-d^2)4drho^3lnleft(fracd+rhod-rhoright)right]$$
Although it looks like these are vastly different answers, given $rho=1$ and $d=10$, you get the following outputs from $(1)$ and $(2)$:
$$1.; I=0.01$$
$$2.; Iapprox 0.01000046$$
Here's the ratio of solution (2) over (1) for $rhoin(0,1),;din(0,50)$
I tried to tackle this problem differently than my professor, and set up the following integrals to solve the problem that lead to solution $(2)$:
$$frac94rho^6left[;intlimits_d-rho^d+rhoxleft[x-fracx^2+d^2-rho^22dright]left[frac(x+d)^2-rho^24dcdot xright];dxright]cdotleft[;intlimits_d-rho^d+rhofracrho^2-(x-d)^22dcdot x;dxright]$$
Where you come in
If the double integral is correctly composed (which my professor felt confident with), I need someone skilled in integration to solve said double integral. I've given two possible solutions and it's probable that the answer will be one of those. If it's solution $(1)$, I know that mine will have an error and you will essentially have proved the inverse square law for gravitational and electric fields. If it's solution $(2)$, then this will be far more exciting to me but less likely. If it's neither, then there are several possible implications
BOUNTY
I'm willing to award the following bounties for solving the double integral at the beginning. Since certain solutions have stronger implications (as explained above), I'm rewarding the following bounties:
- +200 rep if you verify solution $(1)$
- +500 rep if you verify solution $(2)$
- +75 rep for any other solutions (note they'll have to be verified by a second user first)
QUESTIONS
If you have any additional questions feel free to ask, and thanks for reading all this!
calculus integration multivariable-calculus physics
$endgroup$
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Lanier Freeman ending ending at 2019-04-03 23:30:07Z">in 7 days.
One or more of the answers is exemplary and worthy of an additional bounty.
Well thought out post with good detail and verification preferred
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
I hate to be that guy to just post an integration problem and ask how to solve it so I'll give a little relevant info
Okay, so I'm working on a physics project and my professor proposed that the following double integral could potentially solve a problem that I've used an alternative method to solve:
$$I=int_0^piint_0^rhofract^2sinphileft(tcosphi-dright)left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-dright)^2right]^3/2;dt dphi$$
$rho$ is an arbitrary, strictly positive real constant
$d$ is a real constant that satisfies $d>rho$
This integral's value could provide immense insight into fields of uniform, solid spherical objects, so it's actually pretty important for my work.
After some quick attempts to simplify, I decided to try some integral calculators with set values. Needless to say, the result after the first integral seemed so hopeless that I couldn't imagine simplifying and integrating again--not to mention then generalising constant inputs to their original variable form.
However, there is a strong likelihood that $I$ simplifies to one of the following two solutions:
$$text1.This solution comes from inverse square laws$$
$$I=frac1d^2$$
$$text2. This solution comes from a separate computation that I did (integrals below)$$
$$I=left(1-fracrho^25d^2right)left[frac32rho^2+frac3(rho^2-d^2)4drho^3lnleft(fracd+rhod-rhoright)right]$$
Although it looks like these are vastly different answers, given $rho=1$ and $d=10$, you get the following outputs from $(1)$ and $(2)$:
$$1.; I=0.01$$
$$2.; Iapprox 0.01000046$$
Here's the ratio of solution (2) over (1) for $rhoin(0,1),;din(0,50)$
I tried to tackle this problem differently than my professor, and set up the following integrals to solve the problem that lead to solution $(2)$:
$$frac94rho^6left[;intlimits_d-rho^d+rhoxleft[x-fracx^2+d^2-rho^22dright]left[frac(x+d)^2-rho^24dcdot xright];dxright]cdotleft[;intlimits_d-rho^d+rhofracrho^2-(x-d)^22dcdot x;dxright]$$
Where you come in
If the double integral is correctly composed (which my professor felt confident with), I need someone skilled in integration to solve said double integral. I've given two possible solutions and it's probable that the answer will be one of those. If it's solution $(1)$, I know that mine will have an error and you will essentially have proved the inverse square law for gravitational and electric fields. If it's solution $(2)$, then this will be far more exciting to me but less likely. If it's neither, then there are several possible implications
BOUNTY
I'm willing to award the following bounties for solving the double integral at the beginning. Since certain solutions have stronger implications (as explained above), I'm rewarding the following bounties:
- +200 rep if you verify solution $(1)$
- +500 rep if you verify solution $(2)$
- +75 rep for any other solutions (note they'll have to be verified by a second user first)
QUESTIONS
If you have any additional questions feel free to ask, and thanks for reading all this!
calculus integration multivariable-calculus physics
$endgroup$
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Lanier Freeman ending ending at 2019-04-03 23:30:07Z">in 7 days.
One or more of the answers is exemplary and worthy of an additional bounty.
Well thought out post with good detail and verification preferred
$begingroup$
Edited: Typo in the original post
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
So $phiin[0,pi]$, and $tin[0,rho]$ for some ?fixed? constant $rho$? (And the first solution seems to not depend on $rho$. Unexpected, since i can take $rho=0$.) Please fix some framework for all used constants. Things seem to be important, please just fix these details for the eye of a first reader... Help will come in some seconds... (At least numerically, this is the easiest (experimental) validation when explicit choices are given.)
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@LanierFreeman I'm not sure if this is too helpful, but I think the result must depend on rho. If you call the integral $I= I(rho,d)$, then differentiate with rho, I got $I'= -2(fracrhod)^2$, again, differentiated in rho. But this means that the original integral can't depend only on $d$, right?
$endgroup$
– Ryan Goulden
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes this is the type of integration found in some older textbooks on electromagnetism; the aim would be to eventually calculate the magnetic moment of a "classical" spinning electron, say if its charge is uniformly distributed over a spherical volume of radius $d$.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
If it still matters, I also found the answer to be $frac-2rho^33d^2$ by converting to rectangular.
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
I hate to be that guy to just post an integration problem and ask how to solve it so I'll give a little relevant info
Okay, so I'm working on a physics project and my professor proposed that the following double integral could potentially solve a problem that I've used an alternative method to solve:
$$I=int_0^piint_0^rhofract^2sinphileft(tcosphi-dright)left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-dright)^2right]^3/2;dt dphi$$
$rho$ is an arbitrary, strictly positive real constant
$d$ is a real constant that satisfies $d>rho$
This integral's value could provide immense insight into fields of uniform, solid spherical objects, so it's actually pretty important for my work.
After some quick attempts to simplify, I decided to try some integral calculators with set values. Needless to say, the result after the first integral seemed so hopeless that I couldn't imagine simplifying and integrating again--not to mention then generalising constant inputs to their original variable form.
However, there is a strong likelihood that $I$ simplifies to one of the following two solutions:
$$text1.This solution comes from inverse square laws$$
$$I=frac1d^2$$
$$text2. This solution comes from a separate computation that I did (integrals below)$$
$$I=left(1-fracrho^25d^2right)left[frac32rho^2+frac3(rho^2-d^2)4drho^3lnleft(fracd+rhod-rhoright)right]$$
Although it looks like these are vastly different answers, given $rho=1$ and $d=10$, you get the following outputs from $(1)$ and $(2)$:
$$1.; I=0.01$$
$$2.; Iapprox 0.01000046$$
Here's the ratio of solution (2) over (1) for $rhoin(0,1),;din(0,50)$
I tried to tackle this problem differently than my professor, and set up the following integrals to solve the problem that lead to solution $(2)$:
$$frac94rho^6left[;intlimits_d-rho^d+rhoxleft[x-fracx^2+d^2-rho^22dright]left[frac(x+d)^2-rho^24dcdot xright];dxright]cdotleft[;intlimits_d-rho^d+rhofracrho^2-(x-d)^22dcdot x;dxright]$$
Where you come in
If the double integral is correctly composed (which my professor felt confident with), I need someone skilled in integration to solve said double integral. I've given two possible solutions and it's probable that the answer will be one of those. If it's solution $(1)$, I know that mine will have an error and you will essentially have proved the inverse square law for gravitational and electric fields. If it's solution $(2)$, then this will be far more exciting to me but less likely. If it's neither, then there are several possible implications
BOUNTY
I'm willing to award the following bounties for solving the double integral at the beginning. Since certain solutions have stronger implications (as explained above), I'm rewarding the following bounties:
- +200 rep if you verify solution $(1)$
- +500 rep if you verify solution $(2)$
- +75 rep for any other solutions (note they'll have to be verified by a second user first)
QUESTIONS
If you have any additional questions feel free to ask, and thanks for reading all this!
calculus integration multivariable-calculus physics
$endgroup$
I hate to be that guy to just post an integration problem and ask how to solve it so I'll give a little relevant info
Okay, so I'm working on a physics project and my professor proposed that the following double integral could potentially solve a problem that I've used an alternative method to solve:
$$I=int_0^piint_0^rhofract^2sinphileft(tcosphi-dright)left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-dright)^2right]^3/2;dt dphi$$
$rho$ is an arbitrary, strictly positive real constant
$d$ is a real constant that satisfies $d>rho$
This integral's value could provide immense insight into fields of uniform, solid spherical objects, so it's actually pretty important for my work.
After some quick attempts to simplify, I decided to try some integral calculators with set values. Needless to say, the result after the first integral seemed so hopeless that I couldn't imagine simplifying and integrating again--not to mention then generalising constant inputs to their original variable form.
However, there is a strong likelihood that $I$ simplifies to one of the following two solutions:
$$text1.This solution comes from inverse square laws$$
$$I=frac1d^2$$
$$text2. This solution comes from a separate computation that I did (integrals below)$$
$$I=left(1-fracrho^25d^2right)left[frac32rho^2+frac3(rho^2-d^2)4drho^3lnleft(fracd+rhod-rhoright)right]$$
Although it looks like these are vastly different answers, given $rho=1$ and $d=10$, you get the following outputs from $(1)$ and $(2)$:
$$1.; I=0.01$$
$$2.; Iapprox 0.01000046$$
Here's the ratio of solution (2) over (1) for $rhoin(0,1),;din(0,50)$
I tried to tackle this problem differently than my professor, and set up the following integrals to solve the problem that lead to solution $(2)$:
$$frac94rho^6left[;intlimits_d-rho^d+rhoxleft[x-fracx^2+d^2-rho^22dright]left[frac(x+d)^2-rho^24dcdot xright];dxright]cdotleft[;intlimits_d-rho^d+rhofracrho^2-(x-d)^22dcdot x;dxright]$$
Where you come in
If the double integral is correctly composed (which my professor felt confident with), I need someone skilled in integration to solve said double integral. I've given two possible solutions and it's probable that the answer will be one of those. If it's solution $(1)$, I know that mine will have an error and you will essentially have proved the inverse square law for gravitational and electric fields. If it's solution $(2)$, then this will be far more exciting to me but less likely. If it's neither, then there are several possible implications
BOUNTY
I'm willing to award the following bounties for solving the double integral at the beginning. Since certain solutions have stronger implications (as explained above), I'm rewarding the following bounties:
- +200 rep if you verify solution $(1)$
- +500 rep if you verify solution $(2)$
- +75 rep for any other solutions (note they'll have to be verified by a second user first)
QUESTIONS
If you have any additional questions feel free to ask, and thanks for reading all this!
calculus integration multivariable-calculus physics
calculus integration multivariable-calculus physics
edited yesterday
Lanier Freeman
asked 2 days ago
Lanier FreemanLanier Freeman
2,829929
2,829929
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Lanier Freeman ending ending at 2019-04-03 23:30:07Z">in 7 days.
One or more of the answers is exemplary and worthy of an additional bounty.
Well thought out post with good detail and verification preferred
This question has an open bounty worth +100
reputation from Lanier Freeman ending ending at 2019-04-03 23:30:07Z">in 7 days.
One or more of the answers is exemplary and worthy of an additional bounty.
Well thought out post with good detail and verification preferred
$begingroup$
Edited: Typo in the original post
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
So $phiin[0,pi]$, and $tin[0,rho]$ for some ?fixed? constant $rho$? (And the first solution seems to not depend on $rho$. Unexpected, since i can take $rho=0$.) Please fix some framework for all used constants. Things seem to be important, please just fix these details for the eye of a first reader... Help will come in some seconds... (At least numerically, this is the easiest (experimental) validation when explicit choices are given.)
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@LanierFreeman I'm not sure if this is too helpful, but I think the result must depend on rho. If you call the integral $I= I(rho,d)$, then differentiate with rho, I got $I'= -2(fracrhod)^2$, again, differentiated in rho. But this means that the original integral can't depend only on $d$, right?
$endgroup$
– Ryan Goulden
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes this is the type of integration found in some older textbooks on electromagnetism; the aim would be to eventually calculate the magnetic moment of a "classical" spinning electron, say if its charge is uniformly distributed over a spherical volume of radius $d$.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
If it still matters, I also found the answer to be $frac-2rho^33d^2$ by converting to rectangular.
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
$begingroup$
Edited: Typo in the original post
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
So $phiin[0,pi]$, and $tin[0,rho]$ for some ?fixed? constant $rho$? (And the first solution seems to not depend on $rho$. Unexpected, since i can take $rho=0$.) Please fix some framework for all used constants. Things seem to be important, please just fix these details for the eye of a first reader... Help will come in some seconds... (At least numerically, this is the easiest (experimental) validation when explicit choices are given.)
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@LanierFreeman I'm not sure if this is too helpful, but I think the result must depend on rho. If you call the integral $I= I(rho,d)$, then differentiate with rho, I got $I'= -2(fracrhod)^2$, again, differentiated in rho. But this means that the original integral can't depend only on $d$, right?
$endgroup$
– Ryan Goulden
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes this is the type of integration found in some older textbooks on electromagnetism; the aim would be to eventually calculate the magnetic moment of a "classical" spinning electron, say if its charge is uniformly distributed over a spherical volume of radius $d$.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
If it still matters, I also found the answer to be $frac-2rho^33d^2$ by converting to rectangular.
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Edited: Typo in the original post
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Edited: Typo in the original post
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
So $phiin[0,pi]$, and $tin[0,rho]$ for some ?fixed? constant $rho$? (And the first solution seems to not depend on $rho$. Unexpected, since i can take $rho=0$.) Please fix some framework for all used constants. Things seem to be important, please just fix these details for the eye of a first reader... Help will come in some seconds... (At least numerically, this is the easiest (experimental) validation when explicit choices are given.)
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
2 days ago
$begingroup$
So $phiin[0,pi]$, and $tin[0,rho]$ for some ?fixed? constant $rho$? (And the first solution seems to not depend on $rho$. Unexpected, since i can take $rho=0$.) Please fix some framework for all used constants. Things seem to be important, please just fix these details for the eye of a first reader... Help will come in some seconds... (At least numerically, this is the easiest (experimental) validation when explicit choices are given.)
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@LanierFreeman I'm not sure if this is too helpful, but I think the result must depend on rho. If you call the integral $I= I(rho,d)$, then differentiate with rho, I got $I'= -2(fracrhod)^2$, again, differentiated in rho. But this means that the original integral can't depend only on $d$, right?
$endgroup$
– Ryan Goulden
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@LanierFreeman I'm not sure if this is too helpful, but I think the result must depend on rho. If you call the integral $I= I(rho,d)$, then differentiate with rho, I got $I'= -2(fracrhod)^2$, again, differentiated in rho. But this means that the original integral can't depend only on $d$, right?
$endgroup$
– Ryan Goulden
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Yes this is the type of integration found in some older textbooks on electromagnetism; the aim would be to eventually calculate the magnetic moment of a "classical" spinning electron, say if its charge is uniformly distributed over a spherical volume of radius $d$.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Yes this is the type of integration found in some older textbooks on electromagnetism; the aim would be to eventually calculate the magnetic moment of a "classical" spinning electron, say if its charge is uniformly distributed over a spherical volume of radius $d$.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
If it still matters, I also found the answer to be $frac-2rho^33d^2$ by converting to rectangular.
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
2 days ago
$begingroup$
If it still matters, I also found the answer to be $frac-2rho^33d^2$ by converting to rectangular.
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
2 days ago
|
show 6 more comments
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As a mathematician, I would divide by force in the numerator and denominator by $d^3$, substitute $t/d$ by something, thus reducing to the case $d=1$. But here, let it be, we conserve the homogeneous setting as a control of the computations.
We split the numerator, compute first
$$
beginaligned
J_1
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2sinphicdot tcosphi
left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-Dright)^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2(-cosphi)'cdot tcosphi
left[t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&qquadtext Substitution: u=cos phi ,
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_-1^1
frac
t^3; u
left[t^2-2Dt;u+D^2right]^3/2; du
\
&qquadtext Substitution (for $u$, fixed $t$) of the radical v=sqrtt^2-2Dt;u+D^2 ,
\
&qquad u=frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2) , du=-frac vDt; dv\ ,
\
&=
-
int_0^rho
dt
int_sqrtt^2+2Dt+D^2^sqrtt^2-2Dt+D^2
frac
t^3; frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2)
v^3; frac vDt; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
int_D-t^D+t
frac 12D^2
cdot
frac t^2+D^2-v^2
v^2; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
;frac 12D^2
left[
-(t^2+D^2)frac 1v
-1
right]_v=D-t^v=D+t
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
;frac t2D^2
left[
(t^2+D^2)left(frac 1D-t-frac 1D+tright)
-
2t
right]
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
left[
frac DD+t
+frac DD-t
-2fracD^2+t^2D^2
right]
\
&=
Dlnfrac D+tD-t
-
2rholeft(1+frac rho^23D^2right)
.
endaligned
$$
Computer check for $D=2$, $rho=1$ (pari/gp code):
? D=2; r=1;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%19 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384744388
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%20 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384742634
?
? D=223; r=101;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%22 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636670
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%23 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636629
The other integral. I will integrate here first w.r.t. $t$.
$$
beginaligned
J_2
&=
-D
int_0^pi
dphi
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&qquadtext and we consider separately (without the factor $-D$)
\
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&=
int_0-Dcosphi^rho-Dcosphi
frac
(u+Dcosphi)^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; du ,qquad a:= Dsinphi
.
\
&qquad
text Now the integrals can be computed
\
int fracu^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac t(u^2+a^2)^1/2+operatornamearcsinh frac ta+C ,
\
int fracu
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac 1(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
\
int frac1
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac a^2;u(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
endaligned
$$
and the computation goes on.
If my calculus is ok, then
$$
beginaligned
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^pi
dphi;
Bigg[
operatornamearcsinh fract-Dcos phiDsinphi
\&qquadqquadqquad+
fract-Dcosphi(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2sin^2phi
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquadqquad
+frac2(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2
Bigg]_0^rho .
endaligned
$$
I have to submit, hope this is helpful to check with the own computations.
I'll be back, but typing kills a lot of time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, been away. I've added a bounty of +100 to the question. Your answer is fantastic and I'll award one within a week. However, I'm leaving it up to attract other answers as well. Thanks for all the effort
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't the integrand in $J_2$ be $t^2 sin phi/((t - D cos phi)^2 + D^2 sin^2 phi)^3/2$?
$endgroup$
– Maxim
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
With the change of variable $u=cosphi$, the integral on $phi$ becomes
$$int_-1^1fract^2(tu-d)sqrt(u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2)du.$$
By decomposition of the numerator, you will get a term
$$c(t)log((u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2))$$
and another
$$c'(t)arctanfracu-dtdsqrt1-t^2.$$
These terms do not simplify at the bounds of the integration interval.
The integral on $t$ (cubic in $t$ at the denominator) is worse. I am not optimisitc about existence of a closed-form.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
beginalign*
&iint fract^2 sin(phi) (t cos(phi) - d)(t^2 sin^2(phi) + (t cos(phi) - d)^2)^3/2 ,mathrmdt,mathrmdphi \
&= fracsqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)(d^2 - 2 t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi) - 3 d^2 cos(2 phi))6d^2 \
&+ d cos(phi) lnleft(t - d cos(phi) + sqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)right) sin^2(phi) text, endalign*
as one can readily verify. Then $I = frac-2 rho^33 d^2$.
I think for your case $1$, you mean $I propto frac1d^2$. The integral can't be positive because:
$t^2 geq 0$ and
$sin(phi) geq 0$ since $phi in [0,pi]$, but
$t cos(phi) - d < 0$ because $0 < t < rho < d$, while- the denominator is $geq 0$, so
- the integrand is (zero or) negative everywhere.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162469%2fhelp-with-seemingly-hopeless-double-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
As a mathematician, I would divide by force in the numerator and denominator by $d^3$, substitute $t/d$ by something, thus reducing to the case $d=1$. But here, let it be, we conserve the homogeneous setting as a control of the computations.
We split the numerator, compute first
$$
beginaligned
J_1
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2sinphicdot tcosphi
left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-Dright)^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2(-cosphi)'cdot tcosphi
left[t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&qquadtext Substitution: u=cos phi ,
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_-1^1
frac
t^3; u
left[t^2-2Dt;u+D^2right]^3/2; du
\
&qquadtext Substitution (for $u$, fixed $t$) of the radical v=sqrtt^2-2Dt;u+D^2 ,
\
&qquad u=frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2) , du=-frac vDt; dv\ ,
\
&=
-
int_0^rho
dt
int_sqrtt^2+2Dt+D^2^sqrtt^2-2Dt+D^2
frac
t^3; frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2)
v^3; frac vDt; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
int_D-t^D+t
frac 12D^2
cdot
frac t^2+D^2-v^2
v^2; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
;frac 12D^2
left[
-(t^2+D^2)frac 1v
-1
right]_v=D-t^v=D+t
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
;frac t2D^2
left[
(t^2+D^2)left(frac 1D-t-frac 1D+tright)
-
2t
right]
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
left[
frac DD+t
+frac DD-t
-2fracD^2+t^2D^2
right]
\
&=
Dlnfrac D+tD-t
-
2rholeft(1+frac rho^23D^2right)
.
endaligned
$$
Computer check for $D=2$, $rho=1$ (pari/gp code):
? D=2; r=1;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%19 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384744388
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%20 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384742634
?
? D=223; r=101;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%22 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636670
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%23 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636629
The other integral. I will integrate here first w.r.t. $t$.
$$
beginaligned
J_2
&=
-D
int_0^pi
dphi
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&qquadtext and we consider separately (without the factor $-D$)
\
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&=
int_0-Dcosphi^rho-Dcosphi
frac
(u+Dcosphi)^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; du ,qquad a:= Dsinphi
.
\
&qquad
text Now the integrals can be computed
\
int fracu^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac t(u^2+a^2)^1/2+operatornamearcsinh frac ta+C ,
\
int fracu
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac 1(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
\
int frac1
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac a^2;u(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
endaligned
$$
and the computation goes on.
If my calculus is ok, then
$$
beginaligned
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^pi
dphi;
Bigg[
operatornamearcsinh fract-Dcos phiDsinphi
\&qquadqquadqquad+
fract-Dcosphi(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2sin^2phi
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquadqquad
+frac2(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2
Bigg]_0^rho .
endaligned
$$
I have to submit, hope this is helpful to check with the own computations.
I'll be back, but typing kills a lot of time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, been away. I've added a bounty of +100 to the question. Your answer is fantastic and I'll award one within a week. However, I'm leaving it up to attract other answers as well. Thanks for all the effort
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't the integrand in $J_2$ be $t^2 sin phi/((t - D cos phi)^2 + D^2 sin^2 phi)^3/2$?
$endgroup$
– Maxim
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a mathematician, I would divide by force in the numerator and denominator by $d^3$, substitute $t/d$ by something, thus reducing to the case $d=1$. But here, let it be, we conserve the homogeneous setting as a control of the computations.
We split the numerator, compute first
$$
beginaligned
J_1
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2sinphicdot tcosphi
left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-Dright)^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2(-cosphi)'cdot tcosphi
left[t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&qquadtext Substitution: u=cos phi ,
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_-1^1
frac
t^3; u
left[t^2-2Dt;u+D^2right]^3/2; du
\
&qquadtext Substitution (for $u$, fixed $t$) of the radical v=sqrtt^2-2Dt;u+D^2 ,
\
&qquad u=frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2) , du=-frac vDt; dv\ ,
\
&=
-
int_0^rho
dt
int_sqrtt^2+2Dt+D^2^sqrtt^2-2Dt+D^2
frac
t^3; frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2)
v^3; frac vDt; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
int_D-t^D+t
frac 12D^2
cdot
frac t^2+D^2-v^2
v^2; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
;frac 12D^2
left[
-(t^2+D^2)frac 1v
-1
right]_v=D-t^v=D+t
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
;frac t2D^2
left[
(t^2+D^2)left(frac 1D-t-frac 1D+tright)
-
2t
right]
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
left[
frac DD+t
+frac DD-t
-2fracD^2+t^2D^2
right]
\
&=
Dlnfrac D+tD-t
-
2rholeft(1+frac rho^23D^2right)
.
endaligned
$$
Computer check for $D=2$, $rho=1$ (pari/gp code):
? D=2; r=1;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%19 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384744388
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%20 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384742634
?
? D=223; r=101;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%22 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636670
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%23 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636629
The other integral. I will integrate here first w.r.t. $t$.
$$
beginaligned
J_2
&=
-D
int_0^pi
dphi
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&qquadtext and we consider separately (without the factor $-D$)
\
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&=
int_0-Dcosphi^rho-Dcosphi
frac
(u+Dcosphi)^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; du ,qquad a:= Dsinphi
.
\
&qquad
text Now the integrals can be computed
\
int fracu^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac t(u^2+a^2)^1/2+operatornamearcsinh frac ta+C ,
\
int fracu
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac 1(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
\
int frac1
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac a^2;u(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
endaligned
$$
and the computation goes on.
If my calculus is ok, then
$$
beginaligned
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^pi
dphi;
Bigg[
operatornamearcsinh fract-Dcos phiDsinphi
\&qquadqquadqquad+
fract-Dcosphi(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2sin^2phi
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquadqquad
+frac2(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2
Bigg]_0^rho .
endaligned
$$
I have to submit, hope this is helpful to check with the own computations.
I'll be back, but typing kills a lot of time.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Sorry, been away. I've added a bounty of +100 to the question. Your answer is fantastic and I'll award one within a week. However, I'm leaving it up to attract other answers as well. Thanks for all the effort
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't the integrand in $J_2$ be $t^2 sin phi/((t - D cos phi)^2 + D^2 sin^2 phi)^3/2$?
$endgroup$
– Maxim
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
As a mathematician, I would divide by force in the numerator and denominator by $d^3$, substitute $t/d$ by something, thus reducing to the case $d=1$. But here, let it be, we conserve the homogeneous setting as a control of the computations.
We split the numerator, compute first
$$
beginaligned
J_1
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2sinphicdot tcosphi
left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-Dright)^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2(-cosphi)'cdot tcosphi
left[t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&qquadtext Substitution: u=cos phi ,
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_-1^1
frac
t^3; u
left[t^2-2Dt;u+D^2right]^3/2; du
\
&qquadtext Substitution (for $u$, fixed $t$) of the radical v=sqrtt^2-2Dt;u+D^2 ,
\
&qquad u=frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2) , du=-frac vDt; dv\ ,
\
&=
-
int_0^rho
dt
int_sqrtt^2+2Dt+D^2^sqrtt^2-2Dt+D^2
frac
t^3; frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2)
v^3; frac vDt; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
int_D-t^D+t
frac 12D^2
cdot
frac t^2+D^2-v^2
v^2; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
;frac 12D^2
left[
-(t^2+D^2)frac 1v
-1
right]_v=D-t^v=D+t
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
;frac t2D^2
left[
(t^2+D^2)left(frac 1D-t-frac 1D+tright)
-
2t
right]
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
left[
frac DD+t
+frac DD-t
-2fracD^2+t^2D^2
right]
\
&=
Dlnfrac D+tD-t
-
2rholeft(1+frac rho^23D^2right)
.
endaligned
$$
Computer check for $D=2$, $rho=1$ (pari/gp code):
? D=2; r=1;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%19 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384744388
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%20 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384742634
?
? D=223; r=101;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%22 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636670
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%23 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636629
The other integral. I will integrate here first w.r.t. $t$.
$$
beginaligned
J_2
&=
-D
int_0^pi
dphi
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&qquadtext and we consider separately (without the factor $-D$)
\
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&=
int_0-Dcosphi^rho-Dcosphi
frac
(u+Dcosphi)^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; du ,qquad a:= Dsinphi
.
\
&qquad
text Now the integrals can be computed
\
int fracu^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac t(u^2+a^2)^1/2+operatornamearcsinh frac ta+C ,
\
int fracu
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac 1(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
\
int frac1
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac a^2;u(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
endaligned
$$
and the computation goes on.
If my calculus is ok, then
$$
beginaligned
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^pi
dphi;
Bigg[
operatornamearcsinh fract-Dcos phiDsinphi
\&qquadqquadqquad+
fract-Dcosphi(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2sin^2phi
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquadqquad
+frac2(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2
Bigg]_0^rho .
endaligned
$$
I have to submit, hope this is helpful to check with the own computations.
I'll be back, but typing kills a lot of time.
$endgroup$
As a mathematician, I would divide by force in the numerator and denominator by $d^3$, substitute $t/d$ by something, thus reducing to the case $d=1$. But here, let it be, we conserve the homogeneous setting as a control of the computations.
We split the numerator, compute first
$$
beginaligned
J_1
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2sinphicdot tcosphi
left[t^2sin^2phi+left(tcosphi-Dright)^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_0^pi
frac
t^2(-cosphi)'cdot tcosphi
left[t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2right]^3/2; dphi
\
&qquadtext Substitution: u=cos phi ,
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
int_-1^1
frac
t^3; u
left[t^2-2Dt;u+D^2right]^3/2; du
\
&qquadtext Substitution (for $u$, fixed $t$) of the radical v=sqrtt^2-2Dt;u+D^2 ,
\
&qquad u=frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2) , du=-frac vDt; dv\ ,
\
&=
-
int_0^rho
dt
int_sqrtt^2+2Dt+D^2^sqrtt^2-2Dt+D^2
frac
t^3; frac 12Dt(t^2+D^2-v^2)
v^3; frac vDt; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
int_D-t^D+t
frac 12D^2
cdot
frac t^2+D^2-v^2
v^2; dv
\
&=
int_0^rho
t;dt
;frac 12D^2
left[
-(t^2+D^2)frac 1v
-1
right]_v=D-t^v=D+t
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
;frac t2D^2
left[
(t^2+D^2)left(frac 1D-t-frac 1D+tright)
-
2t
right]
\
&=
int_0^rho
dt
left[
frac DD+t
+frac DD-t
-2fracD^2+t^2D^2
right]
\
&=
Dlnfrac D+tD-t
-
2rholeft(1+frac rho^23D^2right)
.
endaligned
$$
Computer check for $D=2$, $rho=1$ (pari/gp code):
? D=2; r=1;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%19 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384744388
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%20 = 0.030557910669552716123823807178384742634
?
? D=223; r=101;
? intnum(t=0,r, intnum(s=0, Pi, t^2*sin(s)*t*cos(s) / (t^2-2*t*D*cos(s)+D^2)^(3/2) ) )
%22 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636670
? D*log( (D+r)/(D-r) ) - 2*r*(1+r^2/3/D^2)
%23 = 1.9969022076015148346071622544965636629
The other integral. I will integrate here first w.r.t. $t$.
$$
beginaligned
J_2
&=
-D
int_0^pi
dphi
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&qquadtext and we consider separately (without the factor $-D$)
\
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^rho
frac
t^2
left[(t-Dcosphi)^2+Dsin^2phiright]^3/2
; dt
\
&=
int_0-Dcosphi^rho-Dcosphi
frac
(u+Dcosphi)^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; du ,qquad a:= Dsinphi
.
\
&qquad
text Now the integrals can be computed
\
int fracu^2
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac t(u^2+a^2)^1/2+operatornamearcsinh frac ta+C ,
\
int fracu
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac 1(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
\
int frac1
(u^2+a^2)^3/2
; dt
&=
-frac a^2;u(u^2+a^2)^1/2+C ,
endaligned
$$
and the computation goes on.
If my calculus is ok, then
$$
beginaligned
J_2(phi)
&=
int_0^pi
dphi;
Bigg[
operatornamearcsinh fract-Dcos phiDsinphi
\&qquadqquadqquad+
fract-Dcosphi(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2sin^2phi
\&qquadqquadqquadqquadqquadqquad
+frac2(t^2-2Dtcosphi+D^2)^1/2
Bigg]_0^rho .
endaligned
$$
I have to submit, hope this is helpful to check with the own computations.
I'll be back, but typing kills a lot of time.
edited yesterday
clathratus
4,9641438
4,9641438
answered yesterday
dan_fuleadan_fulea
6,9581313
6,9581313
$begingroup$
Sorry, been away. I've added a bounty of +100 to the question. Your answer is fantastic and I'll award one within a week. However, I'm leaving it up to attract other answers as well. Thanks for all the effort
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't the integrand in $J_2$ be $t^2 sin phi/((t - D cos phi)^2 + D^2 sin^2 phi)^3/2$?
$endgroup$
– Maxim
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Sorry, been away. I've added a bounty of +100 to the question. Your answer is fantastic and I'll award one within a week. However, I'm leaving it up to attract other answers as well. Thanks for all the effort
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't the integrand in $J_2$ be $t^2 sin phi/((t - D cos phi)^2 + D^2 sin^2 phi)^3/2$?
$endgroup$
– Maxim
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
Sorry, been away. I've added a bounty of +100 to the question. Your answer is fantastic and I'll award one within a week. However, I'm leaving it up to attract other answers as well. Thanks for all the effort
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Sorry, been away. I've added a bounty of +100 to the question. Your answer is fantastic and I'll award one within a week. However, I'm leaving it up to attract other answers as well. Thanks for all the effort
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 hours ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't the integrand in $J_2$ be $t^2 sin phi/((t - D cos phi)^2 + D^2 sin^2 phi)^3/2$?
$endgroup$
– Maxim
24 mins ago
$begingroup$
Shouldn't the integrand in $J_2$ be $t^2 sin phi/((t - D cos phi)^2 + D^2 sin^2 phi)^3/2$?
$endgroup$
– Maxim
24 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
With the change of variable $u=cosphi$, the integral on $phi$ becomes
$$int_-1^1fract^2(tu-d)sqrt(u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2)du.$$
By decomposition of the numerator, you will get a term
$$c(t)log((u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2))$$
and another
$$c'(t)arctanfracu-dtdsqrt1-t^2.$$
These terms do not simplify at the bounds of the integration interval.
The integral on $t$ (cubic in $t$ at the denominator) is worse. I am not optimisitc about existence of a closed-form.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
With the change of variable $u=cosphi$, the integral on $phi$ becomes
$$int_-1^1fract^2(tu-d)sqrt(u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2)du.$$
By decomposition of the numerator, you will get a term
$$c(t)log((u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2))$$
and another
$$c'(t)arctanfracu-dtdsqrt1-t^2.$$
These terms do not simplify at the bounds of the integration interval.
The integral on $t$ (cubic in $t$ at the denominator) is worse. I am not optimisitc about existence of a closed-form.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
With the change of variable $u=cosphi$, the integral on $phi$ becomes
$$int_-1^1fract^2(tu-d)sqrt(u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2)du.$$
By decomposition of the numerator, you will get a term
$$c(t)log((u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2))$$
and another
$$c'(t)arctanfracu-dtdsqrt1-t^2.$$
These terms do not simplify at the bounds of the integration interval.
The integral on $t$ (cubic in $t$ at the denominator) is worse. I am not optimisitc about existence of a closed-form.
$endgroup$
Hint:
With the change of variable $u=cosphi$, the integral on $phi$ becomes
$$int_-1^1fract^2(tu-d)sqrt(u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2)du.$$
By decomposition of the numerator, you will get a term
$$c(t)log((u-dt)^2+d^2(1-t^2))$$
and another
$$c'(t)arctanfracu-dtdsqrt1-t^2.$$
These terms do not simplify at the bounds of the integration interval.
The integral on $t$ (cubic in $t$ at the denominator) is worse. I am not optimisitc about existence of a closed-form.
answered yesterday
Yves DaoustYves Daoust
131k676229
131k676229
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
beginalign*
&iint fract^2 sin(phi) (t cos(phi) - d)(t^2 sin^2(phi) + (t cos(phi) - d)^2)^3/2 ,mathrmdt,mathrmdphi \
&= fracsqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)(d^2 - 2 t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi) - 3 d^2 cos(2 phi))6d^2 \
&+ d cos(phi) lnleft(t - d cos(phi) + sqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)right) sin^2(phi) text, endalign*
as one can readily verify. Then $I = frac-2 rho^33 d^2$.
I think for your case $1$, you mean $I propto frac1d^2$. The integral can't be positive because:
$t^2 geq 0$ and
$sin(phi) geq 0$ since $phi in [0,pi]$, but
$t cos(phi) - d < 0$ because $0 < t < rho < d$, while- the denominator is $geq 0$, so
- the integrand is (zero or) negative everywhere.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
beginalign*
&iint fract^2 sin(phi) (t cos(phi) - d)(t^2 sin^2(phi) + (t cos(phi) - d)^2)^3/2 ,mathrmdt,mathrmdphi \
&= fracsqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)(d^2 - 2 t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi) - 3 d^2 cos(2 phi))6d^2 \
&+ d cos(phi) lnleft(t - d cos(phi) + sqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)right) sin^2(phi) text, endalign*
as one can readily verify. Then $I = frac-2 rho^33 d^2$.
I think for your case $1$, you mean $I propto frac1d^2$. The integral can't be positive because:
$t^2 geq 0$ and
$sin(phi) geq 0$ since $phi in [0,pi]$, but
$t cos(phi) - d < 0$ because $0 < t < rho < d$, while- the denominator is $geq 0$, so
- the integrand is (zero or) negative everywhere.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
beginalign*
&iint fract^2 sin(phi) (t cos(phi) - d)(t^2 sin^2(phi) + (t cos(phi) - d)^2)^3/2 ,mathrmdt,mathrmdphi \
&= fracsqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)(d^2 - 2 t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi) - 3 d^2 cos(2 phi))6d^2 \
&+ d cos(phi) lnleft(t - d cos(phi) + sqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)right) sin^2(phi) text, endalign*
as one can readily verify. Then $I = frac-2 rho^33 d^2$.
I think for your case $1$, you mean $I propto frac1d^2$. The integral can't be positive because:
$t^2 geq 0$ and
$sin(phi) geq 0$ since $phi in [0,pi]$, but
$t cos(phi) - d < 0$ because $0 < t < rho < d$, while- the denominator is $geq 0$, so
- the integrand is (zero or) negative everywhere.
$endgroup$
beginalign*
&iint fract^2 sin(phi) (t cos(phi) - d)(t^2 sin^2(phi) + (t cos(phi) - d)^2)^3/2 ,mathrmdt,mathrmdphi \
&= fracsqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)(d^2 - 2 t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi) - 3 d^2 cos(2 phi))6d^2 \
&+ d cos(phi) lnleft(t - d cos(phi) + sqrtd^2 + t^2 - 2 d t cos(phi)right) sin^2(phi) text, endalign*
as one can readily verify. Then $I = frac-2 rho^33 d^2$.
I think for your case $1$, you mean $I propto frac1d^2$. The integral can't be positive because:
$t^2 geq 0$ and
$sin(phi) geq 0$ since $phi in [0,pi]$, but
$t cos(phi) - d < 0$ because $0 < t < rho < d$, while- the denominator is $geq 0$, so
- the integrand is (zero or) negative everywhere.
edited 1 hour ago
answered 2 hours ago
Eric TowersEric Towers
33k22370
33k22370
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3162469%2fhelp-with-seemingly-hopeless-double-integral%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Edited: Typo in the original post
$endgroup$
– Lanier Freeman
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
So $phiin[0,pi]$, and $tin[0,rho]$ for some ?fixed? constant $rho$? (And the first solution seems to not depend on $rho$. Unexpected, since i can take $rho=0$.) Please fix some framework for all used constants. Things seem to be important, please just fix these details for the eye of a first reader... Help will come in some seconds... (At least numerically, this is the easiest (experimental) validation when explicit choices are given.)
$endgroup$
– dan_fulea
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@LanierFreeman I'm not sure if this is too helpful, but I think the result must depend on rho. If you call the integral $I= I(rho,d)$, then differentiate with rho, I got $I'= -2(fracrhod)^2$, again, differentiated in rho. But this means that the original integral can't depend only on $d$, right?
$endgroup$
– Ryan Goulden
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
Yes this is the type of integration found in some older textbooks on electromagnetism; the aim would be to eventually calculate the magnetic moment of a "classical" spinning electron, say if its charge is uniformly distributed over a spherical volume of radius $d$.
$endgroup$
– James Arathoon
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
If it still matters, I also found the answer to be $frac-2rho^33d^2$ by converting to rectangular.
$endgroup$
– Tom Himler
2 days ago