2019 Community Moderator Election Results Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” question 2019 Community Moderator Election Results2011 Community Moderator Election2011 Moderator Election - Town Hall Chat: 1pm UTC / 8am EST on the 4th - now!2014 Community Moderator Election2014 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire2014 Community Moderator Election ResultsModerator election score2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionWhat’s it like being a Unix & Linux moderator?2019 Community Moderator Election2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
Abandoning the Ordinary World
Check which numbers satisfy the condition [A*B*C = A! + B! + C!]
Output the ŋarâþ crîþ alphabet song without using (m)any letters
How to align text above triangle figure
Identifying polygons that intersect with another layer using QGIS?
What is the logic behind the Maharil's explanation of why we don't say שעשה ניסים on Pesach?
How to find all the available tools in mac terminal?
51k Euros annually for a family of 4 in Berlin: Is it enough?
How to answer "Have you ever been terminated?"
What does this icon in iOS Stardew Valley mean?
Why are Kinder Surprise Eggs illegal in the USA?
How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?
Why do we bend a book to keep it straight?
Why was the term "discrete" used in discrete logarithm?
What are the pros and cons of Aerospike nosecones?
Naming the result of a source block
Storing hydrofluoric acid before the invention of plastics
How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?
What's the purpose of writing one's academic biography in the third person?
Generate an RGB colour grid
Single word antonym of "flightless"
List *all* the tuples!
Why do people hide their license plates in the EU?
Can I cast Passwall to drop an enemy into a 20-foot pit?
2019 Community Moderator Election Results
Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” question
2019 Community Moderator Election Results2011 Community Moderator Election2011 Moderator Election - Town Hall Chat: 1pm UTC / 8am EST on the 4th - now!2014 Community Moderator Election2014 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire2014 Community Moderator Election ResultsModerator election score2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question CollectionWhat’s it like being a Unix & Linux moderator?2019 Community Moderator Election2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
Unix & Linux's third moderator election has come to a close, the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are:
They'll be joining the existing crew shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes!
For details on how the voting played out, you can download the election results here, or view a summary report online.
discussion featured election
add a comment |
Unix & Linux's third moderator election has come to a close, the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are:
They'll be joining the existing crew shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes!
For details on how the voting played out, you can download the election results here, or view a summary report online.
discussion featured election
2
Thanks for linking to the Opavote summary report. It’s an informative explanation of how the votes were transferred after Kusulananda reached the quota. I was curious about how the threshold was calculated but after re-reading, I saw that the Droop formula was used, of which Wikipedia has a good explanation. Congratulations to Kusulananda and Jeff. I, for one, welcome our new multitasking, multiuser, Bell Labs-inspired overlords!
– Anthony Geoghegan
Mar 27 at 15:04
2
@AnthonyGeoghegan: Yes, that report is excellent. STV systems are more complicated than traditional vote counting systems, but having access to that sort of summary helps a ton.
– Jon Ericson♦
Mar 27 at 16:42
add a comment |
Unix & Linux's third moderator election has come to a close, the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are:
They'll be joining the existing crew shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes!
For details on how the voting played out, you can download the election results here, or view a summary report online.
discussion featured election
Unix & Linux's third moderator election has come to a close, the votes have been tallied and the two new moderators are:
They'll be joining the existing crew shortly—please thank them for volunteering, and share your assistance and advice with them as they learn the ropes!
For details on how the voting played out, you can download the election results here, or view a summary report online.
discussion featured election
discussion featured election
asked Mar 26 at 20:00
Jon Ericson♦Jon Ericson
11118
11118
2
Thanks for linking to the Opavote summary report. It’s an informative explanation of how the votes were transferred after Kusulananda reached the quota. I was curious about how the threshold was calculated but after re-reading, I saw that the Droop formula was used, of which Wikipedia has a good explanation. Congratulations to Kusulananda and Jeff. I, for one, welcome our new multitasking, multiuser, Bell Labs-inspired overlords!
– Anthony Geoghegan
Mar 27 at 15:04
2
@AnthonyGeoghegan: Yes, that report is excellent. STV systems are more complicated than traditional vote counting systems, but having access to that sort of summary helps a ton.
– Jon Ericson♦
Mar 27 at 16:42
add a comment |
2
Thanks for linking to the Opavote summary report. It’s an informative explanation of how the votes were transferred after Kusulananda reached the quota. I was curious about how the threshold was calculated but after re-reading, I saw that the Droop formula was used, of which Wikipedia has a good explanation. Congratulations to Kusulananda and Jeff. I, for one, welcome our new multitasking, multiuser, Bell Labs-inspired overlords!
– Anthony Geoghegan
Mar 27 at 15:04
2
@AnthonyGeoghegan: Yes, that report is excellent. STV systems are more complicated than traditional vote counting systems, but having access to that sort of summary helps a ton.
– Jon Ericson♦
Mar 27 at 16:42
2
2
Thanks for linking to the Opavote summary report. It’s an informative explanation of how the votes were transferred after Kusulananda reached the quota. I was curious about how the threshold was calculated but after re-reading, I saw that the Droop formula was used, of which Wikipedia has a good explanation. Congratulations to Kusulananda and Jeff. I, for one, welcome our new multitasking, multiuser, Bell Labs-inspired overlords!
– Anthony Geoghegan
Mar 27 at 15:04
Thanks for linking to the Opavote summary report. It’s an informative explanation of how the votes were transferred after Kusulananda reached the quota. I was curious about how the threshold was calculated but after re-reading, I saw that the Droop formula was used, of which Wikipedia has a good explanation. Congratulations to Kusulananda and Jeff. I, for one, welcome our new multitasking, multiuser, Bell Labs-inspired overlords!
– Anthony Geoghegan
Mar 27 at 15:04
2
2
@AnthonyGeoghegan: Yes, that report is excellent. STV systems are more complicated than traditional vote counting systems, but having access to that sort of summary helps a ton.
– Jon Ericson♦
Mar 27 at 16:42
@AnthonyGeoghegan: Yes, that report is excellent. STV systems are more complicated than traditional vote counting systems, but having access to that sort of summary helps a ton.
– Jon Ericson♦
Mar 27 at 16:42
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Welcome aboard guys! I only hope you won't regret it! >:)
3
youtube.com/watch?v=1QQBB3cwNM0#t=2m10
– Michael Mrozek♦
Mar 26 at 20:10
Thank you, and ditto! :)
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 26 at 20:33
Echoing Jeff, thanks and I hope so too :-)
– Kusalananda♦
Mar 26 at 21:49
Congratulations @Kusalananda and Jeff! :-)
– Inian
Mar 27 at 9:24
Yay, my #1 and #2 votes won ;-) They've definitely got more patience than me for some of the more problematic edge cases caused by an open community like this!
– Stephen Harris
Mar 28 at 1:38
add a comment |
Thank you to everyone that considered nominating themselves, as well to Arcabard, cnst, ilkkachu, and Kusalananda who decided to actually put themselves up for consideration. I said it in the chat for this election -- and I believe it in general -- that having a variety of choices leads to a better outcome. Special congratulations to Kusalananda who (deservedly) won nearly twice as many votes as I did, and so I look forward to doing half as much work as he does ;)
A special thank you to Stephen Kitt for his question "What’s it like being a Unix & Linux moderator?" and to terdon, slm, and Michael Mrozek for taking time to answer it. It was a huge help to me to learn about the benefits and challenges of being a moderator while I was deciding whether to nominate myself or not.
Thank you to Jon Ericson and Grace Note their help in this election, in particular for putting out the Question Collection and follow-up Questionnaire, and to everyone who submitted questions for it:
- Faheem Mitha
- JdeBP
- K7AAY
- Tim
- Tomasz
- Undercat
- and yes, even Fabby :)
I think threads like these are important because they call out what the community feels is important -- both for site and in a moderator. An open discussion thread like that is a great place for nominees to be able to expand on their ideas and for the community to get a better sense for how the nominees would perform the moderation tasks. Thank you also to JNat for opening up the separate Election chat room so that the community could haven even more discussion around the election and the candidates.
Finally, personal thanks to everyone who expressed support for me, both on the nomination page and in the chat rooms. Seeing comments on (all of) the nominations tells me that people care enough about the site to consider the nominees carefully. It was rewarding to see the comments that were directly supportive of the work I’ve done. I look forward to learning even more about how the site works, and to helping keep the site clean, positive, and moving forward together!
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Welcome aboard guys! I only hope you won't regret it! >:)
3
youtube.com/watch?v=1QQBB3cwNM0#t=2m10
– Michael Mrozek♦
Mar 26 at 20:10
Thank you, and ditto! :)
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 26 at 20:33
Echoing Jeff, thanks and I hope so too :-)
– Kusalananda♦
Mar 26 at 21:49
Congratulations @Kusalananda and Jeff! :-)
– Inian
Mar 27 at 9:24
Yay, my #1 and #2 votes won ;-) They've definitely got more patience than me for some of the more problematic edge cases caused by an open community like this!
– Stephen Harris
Mar 28 at 1:38
add a comment |
Welcome aboard guys! I only hope you won't regret it! >:)
3
youtube.com/watch?v=1QQBB3cwNM0#t=2m10
– Michael Mrozek♦
Mar 26 at 20:10
Thank you, and ditto! :)
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 26 at 20:33
Echoing Jeff, thanks and I hope so too :-)
– Kusalananda♦
Mar 26 at 21:49
Congratulations @Kusalananda and Jeff! :-)
– Inian
Mar 27 at 9:24
Yay, my #1 and #2 votes won ;-) They've definitely got more patience than me for some of the more problematic edge cases caused by an open community like this!
– Stephen Harris
Mar 28 at 1:38
add a comment |
Welcome aboard guys! I only hope you won't regret it! >:)
Welcome aboard guys! I only hope you won't regret it! >:)
answered Mar 26 at 20:07
terdon♦terdon
134k15296
134k15296
3
youtube.com/watch?v=1QQBB3cwNM0#t=2m10
– Michael Mrozek♦
Mar 26 at 20:10
Thank you, and ditto! :)
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 26 at 20:33
Echoing Jeff, thanks and I hope so too :-)
– Kusalananda♦
Mar 26 at 21:49
Congratulations @Kusalananda and Jeff! :-)
– Inian
Mar 27 at 9:24
Yay, my #1 and #2 votes won ;-) They've definitely got more patience than me for some of the more problematic edge cases caused by an open community like this!
– Stephen Harris
Mar 28 at 1:38
add a comment |
3
youtube.com/watch?v=1QQBB3cwNM0#t=2m10
– Michael Mrozek♦
Mar 26 at 20:10
Thank you, and ditto! :)
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 26 at 20:33
Echoing Jeff, thanks and I hope so too :-)
– Kusalananda♦
Mar 26 at 21:49
Congratulations @Kusalananda and Jeff! :-)
– Inian
Mar 27 at 9:24
Yay, my #1 and #2 votes won ;-) They've definitely got more patience than me for some of the more problematic edge cases caused by an open community like this!
– Stephen Harris
Mar 28 at 1:38
3
3
youtube.com/watch?v=1QQBB3cwNM0#t=2m10
– Michael Mrozek♦
Mar 26 at 20:10
youtube.com/watch?v=1QQBB3cwNM0#t=2m10
– Michael Mrozek♦
Mar 26 at 20:10
Thank you, and ditto! :)
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 26 at 20:33
Thank you, and ditto! :)
– Jeff Schaller♦
Mar 26 at 20:33
Echoing Jeff, thanks and I hope so too :-)
– Kusalananda♦
Mar 26 at 21:49
Echoing Jeff, thanks and I hope so too :-)
– Kusalananda♦
Mar 26 at 21:49
Congratulations @Kusalananda and Jeff! :-)
– Inian
Mar 27 at 9:24
Congratulations @Kusalananda and Jeff! :-)
– Inian
Mar 27 at 9:24
Yay, my #1 and #2 votes won ;-) They've definitely got more patience than me for some of the more problematic edge cases caused by an open community like this!
– Stephen Harris
Mar 28 at 1:38
Yay, my #1 and #2 votes won ;-) They've definitely got more patience than me for some of the more problematic edge cases caused by an open community like this!
– Stephen Harris
Mar 28 at 1:38
add a comment |
Thank you to everyone that considered nominating themselves, as well to Arcabard, cnst, ilkkachu, and Kusalananda who decided to actually put themselves up for consideration. I said it in the chat for this election -- and I believe it in general -- that having a variety of choices leads to a better outcome. Special congratulations to Kusalananda who (deservedly) won nearly twice as many votes as I did, and so I look forward to doing half as much work as he does ;)
A special thank you to Stephen Kitt for his question "What’s it like being a Unix & Linux moderator?" and to terdon, slm, and Michael Mrozek for taking time to answer it. It was a huge help to me to learn about the benefits and challenges of being a moderator while I was deciding whether to nominate myself or not.
Thank you to Jon Ericson and Grace Note their help in this election, in particular for putting out the Question Collection and follow-up Questionnaire, and to everyone who submitted questions for it:
- Faheem Mitha
- JdeBP
- K7AAY
- Tim
- Tomasz
- Undercat
- and yes, even Fabby :)
I think threads like these are important because they call out what the community feels is important -- both for site and in a moderator. An open discussion thread like that is a great place for nominees to be able to expand on their ideas and for the community to get a better sense for how the nominees would perform the moderation tasks. Thank you also to JNat for opening up the separate Election chat room so that the community could haven even more discussion around the election and the candidates.
Finally, personal thanks to everyone who expressed support for me, both on the nomination page and in the chat rooms. Seeing comments on (all of) the nominations tells me that people care enough about the site to consider the nominees carefully. It was rewarding to see the comments that were directly supportive of the work I’ve done. I look forward to learning even more about how the site works, and to helping keep the site clean, positive, and moving forward together!
add a comment |
Thank you to everyone that considered nominating themselves, as well to Arcabard, cnst, ilkkachu, and Kusalananda who decided to actually put themselves up for consideration. I said it in the chat for this election -- and I believe it in general -- that having a variety of choices leads to a better outcome. Special congratulations to Kusalananda who (deservedly) won nearly twice as many votes as I did, and so I look forward to doing half as much work as he does ;)
A special thank you to Stephen Kitt for his question "What’s it like being a Unix & Linux moderator?" and to terdon, slm, and Michael Mrozek for taking time to answer it. It was a huge help to me to learn about the benefits and challenges of being a moderator while I was deciding whether to nominate myself or not.
Thank you to Jon Ericson and Grace Note their help in this election, in particular for putting out the Question Collection and follow-up Questionnaire, and to everyone who submitted questions for it:
- Faheem Mitha
- JdeBP
- K7AAY
- Tim
- Tomasz
- Undercat
- and yes, even Fabby :)
I think threads like these are important because they call out what the community feels is important -- both for site and in a moderator. An open discussion thread like that is a great place for nominees to be able to expand on their ideas and for the community to get a better sense for how the nominees would perform the moderation tasks. Thank you also to JNat for opening up the separate Election chat room so that the community could haven even more discussion around the election and the candidates.
Finally, personal thanks to everyone who expressed support for me, both on the nomination page and in the chat rooms. Seeing comments on (all of) the nominations tells me that people care enough about the site to consider the nominees carefully. It was rewarding to see the comments that were directly supportive of the work I’ve done. I look forward to learning even more about how the site works, and to helping keep the site clean, positive, and moving forward together!
add a comment |
Thank you to everyone that considered nominating themselves, as well to Arcabard, cnst, ilkkachu, and Kusalananda who decided to actually put themselves up for consideration. I said it in the chat for this election -- and I believe it in general -- that having a variety of choices leads to a better outcome. Special congratulations to Kusalananda who (deservedly) won nearly twice as many votes as I did, and so I look forward to doing half as much work as he does ;)
A special thank you to Stephen Kitt for his question "What’s it like being a Unix & Linux moderator?" and to terdon, slm, and Michael Mrozek for taking time to answer it. It was a huge help to me to learn about the benefits and challenges of being a moderator while I was deciding whether to nominate myself or not.
Thank you to Jon Ericson and Grace Note their help in this election, in particular for putting out the Question Collection and follow-up Questionnaire, and to everyone who submitted questions for it:
- Faheem Mitha
- JdeBP
- K7AAY
- Tim
- Tomasz
- Undercat
- and yes, even Fabby :)
I think threads like these are important because they call out what the community feels is important -- both for site and in a moderator. An open discussion thread like that is a great place for nominees to be able to expand on their ideas and for the community to get a better sense for how the nominees would perform the moderation tasks. Thank you also to JNat for opening up the separate Election chat room so that the community could haven even more discussion around the election and the candidates.
Finally, personal thanks to everyone who expressed support for me, both on the nomination page and in the chat rooms. Seeing comments on (all of) the nominations tells me that people care enough about the site to consider the nominees carefully. It was rewarding to see the comments that were directly supportive of the work I’ve done. I look forward to learning even more about how the site works, and to helping keep the site clean, positive, and moving forward together!
Thank you to everyone that considered nominating themselves, as well to Arcabard, cnst, ilkkachu, and Kusalananda who decided to actually put themselves up for consideration. I said it in the chat for this election -- and I believe it in general -- that having a variety of choices leads to a better outcome. Special congratulations to Kusalananda who (deservedly) won nearly twice as many votes as I did, and so I look forward to doing half as much work as he does ;)
A special thank you to Stephen Kitt for his question "What’s it like being a Unix & Linux moderator?" and to terdon, slm, and Michael Mrozek for taking time to answer it. It was a huge help to me to learn about the benefits and challenges of being a moderator while I was deciding whether to nominate myself or not.
Thank you to Jon Ericson and Grace Note their help in this election, in particular for putting out the Question Collection and follow-up Questionnaire, and to everyone who submitted questions for it:
- Faheem Mitha
- JdeBP
- K7AAY
- Tim
- Tomasz
- Undercat
- and yes, even Fabby :)
I think threads like these are important because they call out what the community feels is important -- both for site and in a moderator. An open discussion thread like that is a great place for nominees to be able to expand on their ideas and for the community to get a better sense for how the nominees would perform the moderation tasks. Thank you also to JNat for opening up the separate Election chat room so that the community could haven even more discussion around the election and the candidates.
Finally, personal thanks to everyone who expressed support for me, both on the nomination page and in the chat rooms. Seeing comments on (all of) the nominations tells me that people care enough about the site to consider the nominees carefully. It was rewarding to see the comments that were directly supportive of the work I’ve done. I look forward to learning even more about how the site works, and to helping keep the site clean, positive, and moving forward together!
answered Mar 27 at 1:00
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa3ba/fa3ba10937691e7ec4cb9b0872991915bcc87124" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa3ba/fa3ba10937691e7ec4cb9b0872991915bcc87124" alt=""
Jeff Schaller♦Jeff Schaller
45.1k11746
45.1k11746
add a comment |
add a comment |
2
Thanks for linking to the Opavote summary report. It’s an informative explanation of how the votes were transferred after Kusulananda reached the quota. I was curious about how the threshold was calculated but after re-reading, I saw that the Droop formula was used, of which Wikipedia has a good explanation. Congratulations to Kusulananda and Jeff. I, for one, welcome our new multitasking, multiuser, Bell Labs-inspired overlords!
– Anthony Geoghegan
Mar 27 at 15:04
2
@AnthonyGeoghegan: Yes, that report is excellent. STV systems are more complicated than traditional vote counting systems, but having access to that sort of summary helps a ton.
– Jon Ericson♦
Mar 27 at 16:42