Ygtjki

ListPlot join points by nearest neighbor rather than order

Why am I getting the error "non-boolean type specified in a context where a condition is expected" for this request?

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

What is Wonderstone and are there any references to it pre-1982?

What is the meaning of the new sigil in Game of Thrones Season 8 intro?

Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?

How to deal with a team lead who never gives me credit?

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

Error "illegal generic type for instanceof" when using local classes

porting install scripts : can rpm replace apt?

Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

When a candle burns, why does the top of wick glow if bottom of flame is hottest?

When were vectors invented?

Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?

Ring Automorphisms that fix 1.

Can a USB port passively 'listen only'?

What is the logic behind the Maharil's explanation of why we don't say שעשה ניסים on Pesach?

Book where humans were engineered with genes from animal species to survive hostile planets

How does debian/ubuntu knows a package has a updated version

Understanding Ceva's Theorem

Apollo command module space walk?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

Withdrew £2800, but only £2000 shows as withdrawn on online banking; what are my obligations?

Do I have Disadvantage attacking with an off-hand weapon?

.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;

15

$begingroup$

I'm pretty new to D&D and have a question. I am currently playing as a rogue swashbuckler (lvl 3) which encourages dual wielding. I love this mechanic and enjoy playing it so far but I'm confused about the bonus action part of it. I understand you don't add bonuses in most circumstances to the off-hand attack (sneak attack being an exception).

However, my DM tells me whenever I attack with my offhand I need to roll twice and take the lower of the two because I have a disadvantage with my offhand (which is also my bonus action). I can't find anything that says I need to do this. If this is how it works? Is there any way I can get rid of having a disadvantage with my off-hand? Or is this just a DM choice?

dnd-5e rogue advantage-and-disadvantage two-weapon-fighting

share|improve this question

edited Apr 12 at 18:12

V2Blast

27.5k596166

asked Apr 12 at 15:28

b wb w

783

New contributor

b w is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
  $endgroup$
  – Someone_Evil
  Apr 12 at 15:34
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

15

$begingroup$

I'm pretty new to D&D and have a question. I am currently playing as a rogue swashbuckler (lvl 3) which encourages dual wielding. I love this mechanic and enjoy playing it so far but I'm confused about the bonus action part of it. I understand you don't add bonuses in most circumstances to the off-hand attack (sneak attack being an exception).

However, my DM tells me whenever I attack with my offhand I need to roll twice and take the lower of the two because I have a disadvantage with my offhand (which is also my bonus action). I can't find anything that says I need to do this. If this is how it works? Is there any way I can get rid of having a disadvantage with my off-hand? Or is this just a DM choice?

dnd-5e rogue advantage-and-disadvantage two-weapon-fighting

share|improve this question

edited Apr 12 at 18:12

V2Blast

27.5k596166

asked Apr 12 at 15:28

b wb w

783

New contributor

b w is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  1
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  Welcome to RPG.SE! Take the tour if you haven't already, and check out the help center for more guidance. Good Luck and Happy Gaming!
  $endgroup$
  – Someone_Evil
  Apr 12 at 15:34
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

I'm pretty new to D&D and have a question. I am currently playing as a rogue swashbuckler (lvl 3) which encourages dual wielding. I love this mechanic and enjoy playing it so far but I'm confused about the bonus action part of it. I understand you don't add bonuses in most circumstances to the off-hand attack (sneak attack being an exception).

However, my DM tells me whenever I attack with my offhand I need to roll twice and take the lower of the two because I have a disadvantage with my offhand (which is also my bonus action). I can't find anything that says I need to do this. If this is how it works? Is there any way I can get rid of having a disadvantage with my off-hand? Or is this just a DM choice?

dnd-5e rogue advantage-and-disadvantage two-weapon-fighting

share|improve this question

edited Apr 12 at 18:12

V2Blast

27.5k596166

asked Apr 12 at 15:28

b wb w

783

New contributor

b w is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

$endgroup$

share|improve this question

edited Apr 12 at 18:12

V2Blast

27.5k596166

asked Apr 12 at 15:28

b wb w

783

New contributor

b w is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

share|improve this question

edited Apr 12 at 18:12

V2Blast

27.5k596166

asked Apr 12 at 15:28

b wb w

783

New contributor

b w is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

edited Apr 12 at 18:12

V2Blast

27.5k596166

edited Apr 12 at 18:12

V2Blast

27.5k596166

asked Apr 12 at 15:28

b wb w

783

New contributor

b w is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

asked Apr 12 at 15:28

b wb w

783

1 Answer
1

active

oldest

votes

27

$begingroup$

This seems to be a houserule created by your DM. By the rules, you don't have Disadvantage on attacks with your off-hand weapon, you just don't add your ability modifier to the damage it deals. And, unless you have a feat or ability saying otherwise, both weapons you're using must be Light weapons, limiting the size of weapons you can use with it.

You might want to ask your DM why they introduced this extra rule, or why they think this is the normal way to play.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 12 at 15:39

ErikErik

49k14183247

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  In the GM's defense, earlier editions did sometimes implement maluses to attacks made with a second weapons. 2e, for instance, gave a -2 to the "main" weapon and -4 to the secondary weapon on attack rolls.
  $endgroup$
  – nitsua60♦
  Apr 12 at 18:04
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  7
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's also worth noting that two-weapon fighting in general is already very weak (low damage for the cost of a bonus action) for basically anyone except rogues, for whom it's a second chance to get Sneak Attack, and this house-rule would make it even less appealing.
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  Apr 12 at 18:13
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  7
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @V2Blast And of course, disadvantage would prevent them from being able to Sneak Attack with their off-hand, which makes it even less appealing for them.
  $endgroup$
  – John Montgomery
  Apr 12 at 23:00
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

Your Answer

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);

b w is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.

draft saved

draft discarded

Sign up or log in

StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);

Sign up using Google

Sign up using Facebook

Sign up using Email and Password

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145091%2fdo-i-have-disadvantage-attacking-with-an-off-hand-weapon%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest

Name

Email

Required, but never shown

27

$begingroup$

This seems to be a houserule created by your DM. By the rules, you don't have Disadvantage on attacks with your off-hand weapon, you just don't add your ability modifier to the damage it deals. And, unless you have a feat or ability saying otherwise, both weapons you're using must be Light weapons, limiting the size of weapons you can use with it.

You might want to ask your DM why they introduced this extra rule, or why they think this is the normal way to play.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 12 at 15:39

ErikErik

49k14183247

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  In the GM's defense, earlier editions did sometimes implement maluses to attacks made with a second weapons. 2e, for instance, gave a -2 to the "main" weapon and -4 to the secondary weapon on attack rolls.
  $endgroup$
  – nitsua60♦
  Apr 12 at 18:04
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  7
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's also worth noting that two-weapon fighting in general is already very weak (low damage for the cost of a bonus action) for basically anyone except rogues, for whom it's a second chance to get Sneak Attack, and this house-rule would make it even less appealing.
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  Apr 12 at 18:13
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  7
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @V2Blast And of course, disadvantage would prevent them from being able to Sneak Attack with their off-hand, which makes it even less appealing for them.
  $endgroup$
  – John Montgomery
  Apr 12 at 23:00
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

27

$begingroup$

This seems to be a houserule created by your DM. By the rules, you don't have Disadvantage on attacks with your off-hand weapon, you just don't add your ability modifier to the damage it deals. And, unless you have a feat or ability saying otherwise, both weapons you're using must be Light weapons, limiting the size of weapons you can use with it.

You might want to ask your DM why they introduced this extra rule, or why they think this is the normal way to play.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 12 at 15:39

ErikErik

49k14183247

$endgroup$

• 
  
  
  

  
  3
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  In the GM's defense, earlier editions did sometimes implement maluses to attacks made with a second weapons. 2e, for instance, gave a -2 to the "main" weapon and -4 to the secondary weapon on attack rolls.
  $endgroup$
  – nitsua60♦
  Apr 12 at 18:04
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  7
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  It's also worth noting that two-weapon fighting in general is already very weak (low damage for the cost of a bonus action) for basically anyone except rogues, for whom it's a second chance to get Sneak Attack, and this house-rule would make it even less appealing.
  $endgroup$
  – V2Blast
  Apr 12 at 18:13
  

  
  
  
  


• 
  
  
  

  
  7
  

  
  
  
  
  
  

  
  $begingroup$
  @V2Blast And of course, disadvantage would prevent them from being able to Sneak Attack with their off-hand, which makes it even less appealing for them.
  $endgroup$
  – John Montgomery
  Apr 12 at 23:00
  

  
  
  
  

add a comment | 

$begingroup$

This seems to be a houserule created by your DM. By the rules, you don't have Disadvantage on attacks with your off-hand weapon, you just don't add your ability modifier to the damage it deals. And, unless you have a feat or ability saying otherwise, both weapons you're using must be Light weapons, limiting the size of weapons you can use with it.

You might want to ask your DM why they introduced this extra rule, or why they think this is the normal way to play.

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 12 at 15:39

ErikErik

49k14183247

$endgroup$

share|improve this answer

answered Apr 12 at 15:39

ErikErik

49k14183247

answered Apr 12 at 15:39

ErikErik

49k14183247

answered Apr 12 at 15:39

ErikErik

49k14183247