Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Does the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?
What is the appropriate index architecture when forced to implement IsDeleted (soft deletes)?
Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript
Most bit efficient text communication method?
How does the math work when buying airline miles?
Is there any word for a place full of confusion?
Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?
Effects on objects due to a brief relocation of massive amounts of mass
Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube
Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items
Sum letters are not two different
How would a mousetrap for use in space work?
How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?
Is grep documentation about ignoring case wrong, since it doesn't ignore case in filenames?
How to get all distinct words within a set of lines?
Question about debouncing - delay of state change
Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?
Project Euler #1 in C++
Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?
What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?
Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?
Update module to run alter command
Monolithic + MicroServices
If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?
Should there be a hyphen in the construction "IT affin"?
Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Does the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like
std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs)
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);
Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:
std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));
I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.
c++
New contributor
add a comment |
A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like
std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs)
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);
Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:
std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));
I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.
c++
New contributor
I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.
– JVApen
Apr 14 at 20:03
std::bind, see details below
– Helmut Zeisel
Apr 16 at 7:24
add a comment |
A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like
std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs)
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);
Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:
std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));
I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.
c++
New contributor
A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like
std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs)
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);
Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:
std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));
I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.
c++
c++
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked Apr 14 at 17:59
Fomar putesFomar putes
534
534
New contributor
New contributor
I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.
– JVApen
Apr 14 at 20:03
std::bind, see details below
– Helmut Zeisel
Apr 16 at 7:24
add a comment |
I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.
– JVApen
Apr 14 at 20:03
std::bind, see details below
– Helmut Zeisel
Apr 16 at 7:24
I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.
– JVApen
Apr 14 at 20:03
I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.
– JVApen
Apr 14 at 20:03
std::bind, see details below
– Helmut Zeisel
Apr 16 at 7:24
std::bind, see details below
– Helmut Zeisel
Apr 16 at 7:24
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
The STL
should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function
could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n)
times rather than the optimal n.
To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :
std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);
Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform
it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:
auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );
Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.
– Davis Herring
Apr 14 at 22:10
add a comment |
The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.
add a comment |
In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:
typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
The STL
should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function
could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n)
times rather than the optimal n.
To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :
std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);
Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform
it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:
auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );
Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.
– Davis Herring
Apr 14 at 22:10
add a comment |
The STL
should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function
could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n)
times rather than the optimal n.
To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :
std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);
Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform
it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:
auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );
Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.
– Davis Herring
Apr 14 at 22:10
add a comment |
The STL
should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function
could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n)
times rather than the optimal n.
To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :
std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);
Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform
it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:
auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );
The STL
should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function
could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n)
times rather than the optimal n.
To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :
std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);
Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform
it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:
auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );
answered Apr 14 at 19:59
Ben Chaliah AyoubBen Chaliah Ayoub
2,757319
2,757319
Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.
– Davis Herring
Apr 14 at 22:10
add a comment |
Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.
– Davis Herring
Apr 14 at 22:10
Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.
– Davis Herring
Apr 14 at 22:10
Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.
– Davis Herring
Apr 14 at 22:10
add a comment |
The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.
add a comment |
The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.
add a comment |
The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.
The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.
answered Apr 14 at 18:11
Davis HerringDavis Herring
9,1501736
9,1501736
add a comment |
add a comment |
In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:
typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));
add a comment |
In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:
typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));
add a comment |
In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:
typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));
In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:
typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));
answered Apr 15 at 8:32
Helmut ZeiselHelmut Zeisel
1387
1387
add a comment |
add a comment |
Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.
– JVApen
Apr 14 at 20:03
std::bind, see details below
– Helmut Zeisel
Apr 16 at 7:24