Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Does the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?

What is the appropriate index architecture when forced to implement IsDeleted (soft deletes)?

Strange behavior of Object.defineProperty() in JavaScript

Most bit efficient text communication method?

How does the math work when buying airline miles?

Is there any word for a place full of confusion?

Did any compiler fully use 80-bit floating point?

Effects on objects due to a brief relocation of massive amounts of mass

Amount of permutations on an NxNxN Rubik's Cube

Maximum summed subsequences with non-adjacent items

Sum letters are not two different

How would a mousetrap for use in space work?

How come Sam didn't become Lord of Horn Hill?

Is grep documentation about ignoring case wrong, since it doesn't ignore case in filenames?

How to get all distinct words within a set of lines?

Question about debouncing - delay of state change

Is it possible for SQL statements to execute concurrently within a single session in SQL Server?

Project Euler #1 in C++

Is there hard evidence that the grant peer review system performs significantly better than random?

What's the meaning of "fortified infraction restraint"?

Why wasn't DOSKEY integrated with COMMAND.COM?

Update module to run alter command

Monolithic + MicroServices

If Windows 7 doesn't support WSL, then what does Linux subsystem option mean?

Should there be a hyphen in the construction "IT affin"?



Does the STL have a way to apply a function before calling less than?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Data science time! April 2019 and salary with experience
The Ask Question Wizard is Live!Does the 'mutable' keyword have any purpose other than allowing the variable to be modified by a const function?Pretty-print C++ STL containersElegant way to find closest value in a vector from aboveLess-than function dereferencing pointersShould custom containers have free begin/end functions?why do std::sort and partial_sort require random-access iterators?c++ Sort Vector based on distance to external PointHow can I avoid “for” loops with an “if” condition inside them with C++?Do STL algorithms functions, like accumulate, avoid copy if the function passed to them accepts a reference?Why does std::sort segfault with non-transitive comparators?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








10















A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    Apr 14 at 20:03











  • std::bind, see details below

    – Helmut Zeisel
    Apr 16 at 7:24


















10















A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    Apr 14 at 20:03











  • std::bind, see details below

    – Helmut Zeisel
    Apr 16 at 7:24














10












10








10








A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.










share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












A lot of algorithms accept a comparison object. Often, I end up with something like



std::sort(begin, end, [&](auto const& lhs, auto const& rhs) 
return Function(lhs) < Function(rhs);
);


Is there anything in the STL to apply a Function before calling less than? So I could write:



std::sort(begin, end, std::DoesThisExist(Function));


I know I could write my own, but I wonder if this already exists. I glanced through cpprefence but didn't see it. Could easily have missed it.







c++






share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question







New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question






New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked Apr 14 at 17:59









Fomar putesFomar putes

534




534




New contributor




Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Fomar putes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    Apr 14 at 20:03











  • std::bind, see details below

    – Helmut Zeisel
    Apr 16 at 7:24


















  • I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

    – JVApen
    Apr 14 at 20:03











  • std::bind, see details below

    – Helmut Zeisel
    Apr 16 at 7:24

















I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

– JVApen
Apr 14 at 20:03





I don't think this exists, however, it should be very easy to write.

– JVApen
Apr 14 at 20:03













std::bind, see details below

– Helmut Zeisel
Apr 16 at 7:24






std::bind, see details below

– Helmut Zeisel
Apr 16 at 7:24













3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4














The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



auto values = /* some container */;
auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
[](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





share|improve this answer























  • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

    – Davis Herring
    Apr 14 at 22:10


















2














The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






share|improve this answer






























    0














    In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:



     typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
    std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
    std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
    std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));





    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer






      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
      StackExchange.snippets.init();
      );
      );
      , "code-snippets");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "1"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4














      The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




      To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




      std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


      Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



      auto values = /* some container */;
      auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
      ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
      [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





      share|improve this answer























      • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

        – Davis Herring
        Apr 14 at 22:10















      4














      The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




      To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




      std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


      Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



      auto values = /* some container */;
      auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
      ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
      [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





      share|improve this answer























      • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

        – Davis Herring
        Apr 14 at 22:10













      4












      4








      4







      The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




      To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




      std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


      Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



      auto values = /* some container */;
      auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
      ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
      [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );





      share|improve this answer













      The STL should have a sort that works on a transform of the elements rather than the elements themselves. The reason for this being that Function could actually be costly. By simply incorporating it into the comparison as you did you invoke Function nlog(n) times rather than the optimal n.




      To sort arrays in parallel using STL algorithm :




      std::sort(std::execution::par, container.begin(), container.end(), comparison_object);


      Anyway, I think if you try to just sort with ranges::view::transform it will probably still call your function ~n log n many times. But you could just do something like:



      auto values = /* some container */;
      auto keys = values | ranges::view::transform(f) | ranges::to_vector;
      ranges::sort(ranges::view::zip(keys, values),
      [](auto const& x, auto const& y) return std::get<0>(x) < std::get<0>(y); );






      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Apr 14 at 19:59









      Ben Chaliah AyoubBen Chaliah Ayoub

      2,757319




      2,757319












      • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

        – Davis Herring
        Apr 14 at 22:10

















      • Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

        – Davis Herring
        Apr 14 at 22:10
















      Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      Apr 14 at 22:10





      Calling a transform n log n times matters only if its expense is significant compared to the comparison and permutation. In common cases where the “transform” is just selecting a member or performing simple arithmetic, allocating the space for the key values would be much worse than the repeated work.

      – Davis Herring
      Apr 14 at 22:10













      2














      The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






      share|improve this answer



























        2














        The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






        share|improve this answer

























          2












          2








          2







          The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.






          share|improve this answer













          The Ranges TS (which has been merged for C++20) defines variations of many of the standard algorithms that include projections with exactly this behavior.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 14 at 18:11









          Davis HerringDavis Herring

          9,1501736




          9,1501736





















              0














              In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:



               typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
              std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
              std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
              std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));





              share|improve this answer



























                0














                In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:



                 typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
                std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
                std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
                std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));





                share|improve this answer

























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:



                   typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
                  std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
                  std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
                  std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));





                  share|improve this answer













                  In principle, you could use std::bind, but it is very verbose:



                   typedef std::remove_reference<decltype(*begin)>::type T;
                  std::sort(begin, end, std::bind(std::less<T>(),
                  std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_1),
                  std::bind(Function,std::placeholders::_2)));






                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 15 at 8:32









                  Helmut ZeiselHelmut Zeisel

                  1387




                  1387




















                      Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Fomar putes is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55678360%2fdoes-the-stl-have-a-way-to-apply-a-function-before-calling-less-than%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      Helsingborg Esperantistoj el Helsingborg | Vidu ankaŭ | Navigada menuo1 ŝanĝostabila versiopatrolita1 ŝanĝostabila versiopatrolita56°03′N 12°42′O  /  56.05°N, 12.7°O / 56.05; 12.7 (Helsingborg)56°03′N 12°42′O  /  56.05°N, 12.7°O / 56.05; 12.7 (Helsingborg)Helsingborg en la Vikimedia KomunejoKategorio Helsingborg en la Vikimedia KomunejoHelsingborg en la Vikimedia KomunejoKategorio Helsingborg en la Vikimedia Komunejo

                      Linux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesgetting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineL2TP IPsec VPN client configurationOpenvpn stops respondingIssues with getting a tun0 connection to route any and all connections from eth0 to be made to this interface and if not working dropHow to setup port forwarding properly in FreeBsd 11?Getting certificate verify failed error in a Python applicationssh is unable to connect to server in VPNVPN SSL Network Extender in Firefoxgetting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineisc-dhcp-server configurationUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                      NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided