General topology proving something for all of its pointsIf a set contains all its limit points must it be closed?Topology and limit pointsTwo trivial questions in general topologypoint set topology: closed points denseLimit points TopologyFinite point set has limit points for general topological spaces?General topologyGeneral topology: looking for a brief and clear proof that the two main definitions of “closure” are the same.A subset of a topological space is closed iff it contains all its limit points - true or false?Questions on general topology

Can somebody explain Brexit in a few child-proof sentences?

How do I define a right arrow with bar in LaTeX?

Is this Spell Mimic feat balanced?

How was Earth single-handedly capable of creating 3 of the 4 gods of chaos?

How does residential electricity work?

Lay out the Carpet

How do I keep an essay about "feeling flat" from feeling flat?

Implement the Thanos sorting algorithm

Opposite of a diet

Will it be accepted, if there is no ''Main Character" stereotype?

Can a monster with multiattack use this ability if they are missing a limb?

Efficiently merge handle parallel feature branches in SFDX

What is the oldest known work of fiction?

Is there any easy technique written in Bhagavad GITA to control lust?

apt-get update is failing in debian

The baby cries all morning

Can I Retrieve Email Addresses from BCC?

Was the picture area of a CRT a parallelogram (instead of a true rectangle)?

Failed to fetch jessie backports repository

What defines a dissertation?

Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?

Why is `const int& k = i; ++i; ` possible?

Confused about a passage in Harry Potter y la piedra filosofal

Why did Kant, Hegel, and Adorno leave some words and phrases in the Greek alphabet?



General topology proving something for all of its points


If a set contains all its limit points must it be closed?Topology and limit pointsTwo trivial questions in general topologypoint set topology: closed points denseLimit points TopologyFinite point set has limit points for general topological spaces?General topologyGeneral topology: looking for a brief and clear proof that the two main definitions of “closure” are the same.A subset of a topological space is closed iff it contains all its limit points - true or false?Questions on general topology













2












$begingroup$


My question is: if you prove that something is true for all points in a topological space or a subset of some topological space, does that imply that this property holds for the whole topological space or the subset of the topological space?



EDIT: more concrete if you have a topological space where all of its points are closed then is this space also closed? If that even makes sense.



If this is true am I then allowed to pick an arbitrary point of the space and then show that since it holds for this one point then the topological space has this property?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What kind of property are we talking about?
    $endgroup$
    – st.math
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $X$ is closed in $X$ by definition...
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    yesterday







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, any space is closed in itself. That's part of the definition of a topology, and doesn't really have anything to do with whether single points are closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your question is too broad to make much sense. Every point $x$ in a topological space $X$ has the property that $xneq X$ as sets can't contain themselves, but $X$ does not have this property. I can't actually think of a property that applies to points that can also apply to spaces in any meaningful way.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Thingum
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's because finite union of closed sets is closed
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    yesterday
















2












$begingroup$


My question is: if you prove that something is true for all points in a topological space or a subset of some topological space, does that imply that this property holds for the whole topological space or the subset of the topological space?



EDIT: more concrete if you have a topological space where all of its points are closed then is this space also closed? If that even makes sense.



If this is true am I then allowed to pick an arbitrary point of the space and then show that since it holds for this one point then the topological space has this property?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What kind of property are we talking about?
    $endgroup$
    – st.math
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $X$ is closed in $X$ by definition...
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    yesterday







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, any space is closed in itself. That's part of the definition of a topology, and doesn't really have anything to do with whether single points are closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your question is too broad to make much sense. Every point $x$ in a topological space $X$ has the property that $xneq X$ as sets can't contain themselves, but $X$ does not have this property. I can't actually think of a property that applies to points that can also apply to spaces in any meaningful way.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Thingum
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's because finite union of closed sets is closed
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    yesterday














2












2








2





$begingroup$


My question is: if you prove that something is true for all points in a topological space or a subset of some topological space, does that imply that this property holds for the whole topological space or the subset of the topological space?



EDIT: more concrete if you have a topological space where all of its points are closed then is this space also closed? If that even makes sense.



If this is true am I then allowed to pick an arbitrary point of the space and then show that since it holds for this one point then the topological space has this property?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




My question is: if you prove that something is true for all points in a topological space or a subset of some topological space, does that imply that this property holds for the whole topological space or the subset of the topological space?



EDIT: more concrete if you have a topological space where all of its points are closed then is this space also closed? If that even makes sense.



If this is true am I then allowed to pick an arbitrary point of the space and then show that since it holds for this one point then the topological space has this property?







general-topology






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday







Jensens

















asked yesterday









JensensJensens

366




366







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What kind of property are we talking about?
    $endgroup$
    – st.math
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $X$ is closed in $X$ by definition...
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    yesterday







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, any space is closed in itself. That's part of the definition of a topology, and doesn't really have anything to do with whether single points are closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your question is too broad to make much sense. Every point $x$ in a topological space $X$ has the property that $xneq X$ as sets can't contain themselves, but $X$ does not have this property. I can't actually think of a property that applies to points that can also apply to spaces in any meaningful way.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Thingum
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's because finite union of closed sets is closed
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    yesterday













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    What kind of property are we talking about?
    $endgroup$
    – st.math
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    $X$ is closed in $X$ by definition...
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    yesterday







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Well, any space is closed in itself. That's part of the definition of a topology, and doesn't really have anything to do with whether single points are closed.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your question is too broad to make much sense. Every point $x$ in a topological space $X$ has the property that $xneq X$ as sets can't contain themselves, but $X$ does not have this property. I can't actually think of a property that applies to points that can also apply to spaces in any meaningful way.
    $endgroup$
    – Robert Thingum
    yesterday







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    It's because finite union of closed sets is closed
    $endgroup$
    – YuiTo Cheng
    yesterday








1




1




$begingroup$
What kind of property are we talking about?
$endgroup$
– st.math
yesterday




$begingroup$
What kind of property are we talking about?
$endgroup$
– st.math
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
$X$ is closed in $X$ by definition...
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
yesterday





$begingroup$
$X$ is closed in $X$ by definition...
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
yesterday





1




1




$begingroup$
Well, any space is closed in itself. That's part of the definition of a topology, and doesn't really have anything to do with whether single points are closed.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
yesterday




$begingroup$
Well, any space is closed in itself. That's part of the definition of a topology, and doesn't really have anything to do with whether single points are closed.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
Your question is too broad to make much sense. Every point $x$ in a topological space $X$ has the property that $xneq X$ as sets can't contain themselves, but $X$ does not have this property. I can't actually think of a property that applies to points that can also apply to spaces in any meaningful way.
$endgroup$
– Robert Thingum
yesterday





$begingroup$
Your question is too broad to make much sense. Every point $x$ in a topological space $X$ has the property that $xneq X$ as sets can't contain themselves, but $X$ does not have this property. I can't actually think of a property that applies to points that can also apply to spaces in any meaningful way.
$endgroup$
– Robert Thingum
yesterday





2




2




$begingroup$
It's because finite union of closed sets is closed
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
yesterday





$begingroup$
It's because finite union of closed sets is closed
$endgroup$
– YuiTo Cheng
yesterday











3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

The answer, as far as your specific example is concerned, is negative. Every topological space $X$ is a closed subset of itself. However, there are topological spaces in which not all points are closed.



A better example would be: a set which consists of a single point is always compact and connected, but lots of topological spaces are neither compact nor connected.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    As your example property "is closed" illustrates, the properties of single points in a space and the space as a whole are not entirely linked together. At the very least, it's not something you can count on in general. I would personally suggest you instead as a general rule assume they are not connected, and make note of the times it does happen.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      3












      $begingroup$

      Taken literally, your question is ill-posed.



      This is because a topological space and a point in the topological space are different kinds of things. When we say that a point is closed in a topological space, what we really mean is that its singleton is closed. This is literally very different, but because "a point is closed" taken literally is, in general, nonsensical, this short of shorthand is acceptable.



      Having this in mind, you could rephrase your question to a more meaningful (not nonsensical) one:




      Let $X$ be a topological space, and let $Asubseteq X$. If $P$ is a topological property of a subset of $X$ and for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ has the property $P$, does $A$ also have the property $P$?




      The answer is trivially no. If you consider "not being a singleton" a topological property, then it fails spectacularly. Otherwise, the property you consider, "being closed" (definitely a topological property) also fails: for example, if you consider $(0,1)subseteq mathbf R$, then (the singleton of) every point in $(0,1)$ is closed in the reals, but $(0,1)$ is not.



      You might ask for what properties $P$ this is true. One such property is being open: if for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ is open in $X$, then $A$ itself is open (as a union of open sets). I strongly suspect that this is just about the only interesting and nontrivial property for which this is true (for suitable notions of "interesting" and "nontrivial").



      A related, far more interesting question is about what topological properties are local, or in other words, what properties of a topological space are true for a space if and only if every point has a neighbourhood with the same property.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Very good answer appreciate it, yes it was difficult for me to ask the question properly I think know it makes a lot more sense
        $endgroup$
        – Jensens
        yesterday










      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161827%2fgeneral-topology-proving-something-for-all-of-its-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      The answer, as far as your specific example is concerned, is negative. Every topological space $X$ is a closed subset of itself. However, there are topological spaces in which not all points are closed.



      A better example would be: a set which consists of a single point is always compact and connected, but lots of topological spaces are neither compact nor connected.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        4












        $begingroup$

        The answer, as far as your specific example is concerned, is negative. Every topological space $X$ is a closed subset of itself. However, there are topological spaces in which not all points are closed.



        A better example would be: a set which consists of a single point is always compact and connected, but lots of topological spaces are neither compact nor connected.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          The answer, as far as your specific example is concerned, is negative. Every topological space $X$ is a closed subset of itself. However, there are topological spaces in which not all points are closed.



          A better example would be: a set which consists of a single point is always compact and connected, but lots of topological spaces are neither compact nor connected.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          The answer, as far as your specific example is concerned, is negative. Every topological space $X$ is a closed subset of itself. However, there are topological spaces in which not all points are closed.



          A better example would be: a set which consists of a single point is always compact and connected, but lots of topological spaces are neither compact nor connected.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered yesterday









          José Carlos SantosJosé Carlos Santos

          170k23132238




          170k23132238





















              3












              $begingroup$

              As your example property "is closed" illustrates, the properties of single points in a space and the space as a whole are not entirely linked together. At the very least, it's not something you can count on in general. I would personally suggest you instead as a general rule assume they are not connected, and make note of the times it does happen.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                3












                $begingroup$

                As your example property "is closed" illustrates, the properties of single points in a space and the space as a whole are not entirely linked together. At the very least, it's not something you can count on in general. I would personally suggest you instead as a general rule assume they are not connected, and make note of the times it does happen.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  3












                  3








                  3





                  $begingroup$

                  As your example property "is closed" illustrates, the properties of single points in a space and the space as a whole are not entirely linked together. At the very least, it's not something you can count on in general. I would personally suggest you instead as a general rule assume they are not connected, and make note of the times it does happen.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  As your example property "is closed" illustrates, the properties of single points in a space and the space as a whole are not entirely linked together. At the very least, it's not something you can count on in general. I would personally suggest you instead as a general rule assume they are not connected, and make note of the times it does happen.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  ArthurArthur

                  120k7120203




                  120k7120203





















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Taken literally, your question is ill-posed.



                      This is because a topological space and a point in the topological space are different kinds of things. When we say that a point is closed in a topological space, what we really mean is that its singleton is closed. This is literally very different, but because "a point is closed" taken literally is, in general, nonsensical, this short of shorthand is acceptable.



                      Having this in mind, you could rephrase your question to a more meaningful (not nonsensical) one:




                      Let $X$ be a topological space, and let $Asubseteq X$. If $P$ is a topological property of a subset of $X$ and for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ has the property $P$, does $A$ also have the property $P$?




                      The answer is trivially no. If you consider "not being a singleton" a topological property, then it fails spectacularly. Otherwise, the property you consider, "being closed" (definitely a topological property) also fails: for example, if you consider $(0,1)subseteq mathbf R$, then (the singleton of) every point in $(0,1)$ is closed in the reals, but $(0,1)$ is not.



                      You might ask for what properties $P$ this is true. One such property is being open: if for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ is open in $X$, then $A$ itself is open (as a union of open sets). I strongly suspect that this is just about the only interesting and nontrivial property for which this is true (for suitable notions of "interesting" and "nontrivial").



                      A related, far more interesting question is about what topological properties are local, or in other words, what properties of a topological space are true for a space if and only if every point has a neighbourhood with the same property.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Very good answer appreciate it, yes it was difficult for me to ask the question properly I think know it makes a lot more sense
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jensens
                        yesterday















                      3












                      $begingroup$

                      Taken literally, your question is ill-posed.



                      This is because a topological space and a point in the topological space are different kinds of things. When we say that a point is closed in a topological space, what we really mean is that its singleton is closed. This is literally very different, but because "a point is closed" taken literally is, in general, nonsensical, this short of shorthand is acceptable.



                      Having this in mind, you could rephrase your question to a more meaningful (not nonsensical) one:




                      Let $X$ be a topological space, and let $Asubseteq X$. If $P$ is a topological property of a subset of $X$ and for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ has the property $P$, does $A$ also have the property $P$?




                      The answer is trivially no. If you consider "not being a singleton" a topological property, then it fails spectacularly. Otherwise, the property you consider, "being closed" (definitely a topological property) also fails: for example, if you consider $(0,1)subseteq mathbf R$, then (the singleton of) every point in $(0,1)$ is closed in the reals, but $(0,1)$ is not.



                      You might ask for what properties $P$ this is true. One such property is being open: if for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ is open in $X$, then $A$ itself is open (as a union of open sets). I strongly suspect that this is just about the only interesting and nontrivial property for which this is true (for suitable notions of "interesting" and "nontrivial").



                      A related, far more interesting question is about what topological properties are local, or in other words, what properties of a topological space are true for a space if and only if every point has a neighbourhood with the same property.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$












                      • $begingroup$
                        Very good answer appreciate it, yes it was difficult for me to ask the question properly I think know it makes a lot more sense
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jensens
                        yesterday













                      3












                      3








                      3





                      $begingroup$

                      Taken literally, your question is ill-posed.



                      This is because a topological space and a point in the topological space are different kinds of things. When we say that a point is closed in a topological space, what we really mean is that its singleton is closed. This is literally very different, but because "a point is closed" taken literally is, in general, nonsensical, this short of shorthand is acceptable.



                      Having this in mind, you could rephrase your question to a more meaningful (not nonsensical) one:




                      Let $X$ be a topological space, and let $Asubseteq X$. If $P$ is a topological property of a subset of $X$ and for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ has the property $P$, does $A$ also have the property $P$?




                      The answer is trivially no. If you consider "not being a singleton" a topological property, then it fails spectacularly. Otherwise, the property you consider, "being closed" (definitely a topological property) also fails: for example, if you consider $(0,1)subseteq mathbf R$, then (the singleton of) every point in $(0,1)$ is closed in the reals, but $(0,1)$ is not.



                      You might ask for what properties $P$ this is true. One such property is being open: if for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ is open in $X$, then $A$ itself is open (as a union of open sets). I strongly suspect that this is just about the only interesting and nontrivial property for which this is true (for suitable notions of "interesting" and "nontrivial").



                      A related, far more interesting question is about what topological properties are local, or in other words, what properties of a topological space are true for a space if and only if every point has a neighbourhood with the same property.






                      share|cite|improve this answer









                      $endgroup$



                      Taken literally, your question is ill-posed.



                      This is because a topological space and a point in the topological space are different kinds of things. When we say that a point is closed in a topological space, what we really mean is that its singleton is closed. This is literally very different, but because "a point is closed" taken literally is, in general, nonsensical, this short of shorthand is acceptable.



                      Having this in mind, you could rephrase your question to a more meaningful (not nonsensical) one:




                      Let $X$ be a topological space, and let $Asubseteq X$. If $P$ is a topological property of a subset of $X$ and for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ has the property $P$, does $A$ also have the property $P$?




                      The answer is trivially no. If you consider "not being a singleton" a topological property, then it fails spectacularly. Otherwise, the property you consider, "being closed" (definitely a topological property) also fails: for example, if you consider $(0,1)subseteq mathbf R$, then (the singleton of) every point in $(0,1)$ is closed in the reals, but $(0,1)$ is not.



                      You might ask for what properties $P$ this is true. One such property is being open: if for every $ain A$, the singleton $a$ is open in $X$, then $A$ itself is open (as a union of open sets). I strongly suspect that this is just about the only interesting and nontrivial property for which this is true (for suitable notions of "interesting" and "nontrivial").



                      A related, far more interesting question is about what topological properties are local, or in other words, what properties of a topological space are true for a space if and only if every point has a neighbourhood with the same property.







                      share|cite|improve this answer












                      share|cite|improve this answer



                      share|cite|improve this answer










                      answered yesterday









                      tomasztomasz

                      24k23482




                      24k23482











                      • $begingroup$
                        Very good answer appreciate it, yes it was difficult for me to ask the question properly I think know it makes a lot more sense
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jensens
                        yesterday
















                      • $begingroup$
                        Very good answer appreciate it, yes it was difficult for me to ask the question properly I think know it makes a lot more sense
                        $endgroup$
                        – Jensens
                        yesterday















                      $begingroup$
                      Very good answer appreciate it, yes it was difficult for me to ask the question properly I think know it makes a lot more sense
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jensens
                      yesterday




                      $begingroup$
                      Very good answer appreciate it, yes it was difficult for me to ask the question properly I think know it makes a lot more sense
                      $endgroup$
                      – Jensens
                      yesterday

















                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3161827%2fgeneral-topology-proving-something-for-all-of-its-points%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                      NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

                      대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495