Reserved de-dupe rulesAdding value conditions to dedupe rulesCreate new contacts every time someone makes a contribution ( with duplicate emails )Deduping organizationsWhat are the Attributes for the Reserved DeDupe RulesContact Dedupe BasicsCivi duplicate rules with respect to email & primary versus location typeEmployer on Profile - MismatchingDedupe Rules to import contacts without email addresses *UPDATE*Import Contacts with dedupe rulesUnsupervised reserved rule for individuals not working

Pronouncing Dictionary.com's W.O.D "vade mecum" in English

What would happen to a modern skyscraper if it rains micro blackholes?

Why don't electron-positron collisions release infinite energy?

How can the DM most effectively choose 1 out of an odd number of players to be targeted by an attack or effect?

Can a German sentence have two subjects?

Infinite past with a beginning?

Why don't electromagnetic waves interact with each other?

Set-theoretical foundations of Mathematics with only bounded quantifiers

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

Why is an old chain unsafe?

Shell script can be run only with sh command

Copycat chess is back

What do you call a Matrix-like slowdown and camera movement effect?

Why are 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there are 300k+ births a month?

TGV timetables / schedules?

Theorems that impeded progress

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?

Email Account under attack (really) - anything I can do?

What do you call something that goes against the spirit of the law, but is legal when interpreting the law to the letter?

Japan - Plan around max visa duration

Are tax years 2016 & 2017 back taxes deductible for tax year 2018?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

How did the USSR manage to innovate in an environment characterized by government censorship and high bureaucracy?



Reserved de-dupe rules


Adding value conditions to dedupe rulesCreate new contacts every time someone makes a contribution ( with duplicate emails )Deduping organizationsWhat are the Attributes for the Reserved DeDupe RulesContact Dedupe BasicsCivi duplicate rules with respect to email & primary versus location typeEmployer on Profile - MismatchingDedupe Rules to import contacts without email addresses *UPDATE*Import Contacts with dedupe rulesUnsupervised reserved rule for individuals not working













3















I'm wanting to refine the de-duping rules, but first of all I'd like to find out exactly what the predefined rules are before I create my own. They are reserved, so you can't edit them, which is fine, but it only tells you which fields they use and not what the weights and thresholds are so the full behaviour is not clear.










share|improve this question


























    3















    I'm wanting to refine the de-duping rules, but first of all I'd like to find out exactly what the predefined rules are before I create my own. They are reserved, so you can't edit them, which is fine, but it only tells you which fields they use and not what the weights and thresholds are so the full behaviour is not clear.










    share|improve this question
























      3












      3








      3


      1






      I'm wanting to refine the de-duping rules, but first of all I'd like to find out exactly what the predefined rules are before I create my own. They are reserved, so you can't edit them, which is fine, but it only tells you which fields they use and not what the weights and thresholds are so the full behaviour is not clear.










      share|improve this question














      I'm wanting to refine the de-duping rules, but first of all I'd like to find out exactly what the predefined rules are before I create my own. They are reserved, so you can't edit them, which is fine, but it only tells you which fields they use and not what the weights and thresholds are so the full behaviour is not clear.







      duplicate-contacts






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 4 at 17:09









      Mick KahnMick Kahn

      621316




      621316




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Demerit's and Mick's answers are incorrect for the (built-in) reserved rules - though it's definitely confusing!



          If a RuleGroup has a value in the name field, and that name corresponds to a filename in CRM/Dedupe/BAO/QueryBuilder, then the customized SQL in those files will be used. The existing entries in civicrm_rule for those RuleGroups are holdovers from before that system existed, and editing them has no effect.



          "Standard" dedupe rules with multiple criteria are very inefficient compared to handwritten SQL, which is why this is a valuable technique. You can create your own handwritten queries with hook_civicrm_dedupe, and the Veda dedupe extension has a number of excellent examples. Note that this extension doesn't work on modern Civi because of some of its other functions, but the dedupe rules can be ripped out into something else.



          Finally - I learned just yesterday that the built-in handwritten dedupe rules seem to execute different SQL when comparing in Unsupervised/Supervised mode (a single contact) vs. General mode (find all dupes). While I haven't proved it, I suspect that if you're in the rare scenario of needing to optimize your unsupervised/supervised dedupes, creating a new class to extend CRM_Dedupe_BAO_QueryBuilder is the way to go. I just posted org.agbu.optimizeddedupe to provide an example of this.



          UPDATE: More clarification.



          To understand how the queries work, it's best to look at an example, eg IndividualUnsupervised.php.



          The internal function is used if you go to Contacts » Find and Merge Duplicate Contacts and click Use Rule. The SQL query is:





           SELECT contact1.id as id1, contact2.id as id2, $rg->threshold as weight
          FROM civicrm_contact as contact1
          JOIN civicrm_email as email1 ON email1.contact_id=contact1.id
          JOIN civicrm_contact as contact2 ON
          contact1.first_name = contact2.first_name AND
          contact1.last_name = contact2.last_name
          JOIN civicrm_email as email2 ON
          email2.contact_id=contact2.id AND
          email1.email=email2.email
          WHERE contact1.contact_type = 'Individual'"


          First, note that the weight is set to $rg->threshold - that is, the threshold in civicrm_rule_group. In other words, if this SQL matches, these records automatically meet the threshold for that rule. Hopefully that answers your main question! If you remove that field, you can run this SQL as-is in a SQL client and get a complete list of the duplicates it would return.



          To further clarify - unlike "regular" rules which are the result of several queries, each with their own weight - this runs a SINGLE query, and sets the weight equal to the rule's threshold. So it's a straight yes/no answer whether a record is a duplicate, based on whether the SQL finds them.



          That's not to say that you can't simulate length/weight, but it's tricky. My org.agbu.optimizeddedupe rule has a SQL statement you can look at which gives the same results as this rule:



          enter image description here



          However, it took about 5 seconds to compare even a single submitted contact against the existing 165,000 contacts in this databse with the existing rule. Now it's almost instantaneous.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks. Good lord...

            – Demerit
            2 days ago











          • Jon G - that's all very interesting, but a bit beyond me. I don't think I need to optimize my own dedupe rules and I know I can make my own rules supervised or unsupervised and leave the prefigured rules unused as general. What I was trying to do was understand the weights/thresholds for the preconfigured rules. I don't see any values in the code etc that you have pointed to, so do they still come from the queries that Deremit has provided. They are certain;y compatible with the results that I see.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago











          • I'm still a bit confused as I'm not that good at reading the code, though I can work out enough see that these rules are treated a special case. I can't see any values for length, weight or threshold there so still don't know the actual criteria for considering contacts to be duplicate under these rules. Or is some different algorithm used. Given that I have a relatively small number of contacts, I can just ditch the pre-configured rules and use my own (less efficient) ones. But it would be nice to know the criteria used in order to understand why some duplicates have been created.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago












          • @MickKahn I just updated my answer, hopefully it makes things clearer!

            – Jon G - Megaphone Tech
            2 days ago











          • Thanks Jon - I don't understand it all, but see that my answer is not helpful so will delete that. I'm seeing some other unexpected results, but can acheive what I need with my own rules, so will move on to other things for now.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago


















          2














          EDIT: This answer is wrong. See Jon's answer. The reserved rules don't use the values in the database they use custom queries.




          If you have access to the database type



          SELECT * from civicrm_dedupe_rule r inner join civicrm_dedupe_rule_group rg on rg.id = r.dedupe_rule_group_id;



          which will give you a table which isn't pretty but is mostly understandable.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Ah you're right. I'll update answer.

            – Demerit
            Apr 4 at 18:19











          • Thanks that tells me what I need, so I have deleted my earlier comment on your previous version of the answer

            – Mick Kahn
            Apr 4 at 20:22











          • The 'green tick' belongs on Jon's answer since the question is about reserved rules.

            – Aidan
            2 days ago











          • I'm taking off the green tick because Deremit has marked the answer as wrong, but (see below), I'm not offering the tick to Jon's answer yet as it doesn't fully answer my question.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "605"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcivicrm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29155%2freserved-de-dupe-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes








          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Demerit's and Mick's answers are incorrect for the (built-in) reserved rules - though it's definitely confusing!



          If a RuleGroup has a value in the name field, and that name corresponds to a filename in CRM/Dedupe/BAO/QueryBuilder, then the customized SQL in those files will be used. The existing entries in civicrm_rule for those RuleGroups are holdovers from before that system existed, and editing them has no effect.



          "Standard" dedupe rules with multiple criteria are very inefficient compared to handwritten SQL, which is why this is a valuable technique. You can create your own handwritten queries with hook_civicrm_dedupe, and the Veda dedupe extension has a number of excellent examples. Note that this extension doesn't work on modern Civi because of some of its other functions, but the dedupe rules can be ripped out into something else.



          Finally - I learned just yesterday that the built-in handwritten dedupe rules seem to execute different SQL when comparing in Unsupervised/Supervised mode (a single contact) vs. General mode (find all dupes). While I haven't proved it, I suspect that if you're in the rare scenario of needing to optimize your unsupervised/supervised dedupes, creating a new class to extend CRM_Dedupe_BAO_QueryBuilder is the way to go. I just posted org.agbu.optimizeddedupe to provide an example of this.



          UPDATE: More clarification.



          To understand how the queries work, it's best to look at an example, eg IndividualUnsupervised.php.



          The internal function is used if you go to Contacts » Find and Merge Duplicate Contacts and click Use Rule. The SQL query is:





           SELECT contact1.id as id1, contact2.id as id2, $rg->threshold as weight
          FROM civicrm_contact as contact1
          JOIN civicrm_email as email1 ON email1.contact_id=contact1.id
          JOIN civicrm_contact as contact2 ON
          contact1.first_name = contact2.first_name AND
          contact1.last_name = contact2.last_name
          JOIN civicrm_email as email2 ON
          email2.contact_id=contact2.id AND
          email1.email=email2.email
          WHERE contact1.contact_type = 'Individual'"


          First, note that the weight is set to $rg->threshold - that is, the threshold in civicrm_rule_group. In other words, if this SQL matches, these records automatically meet the threshold for that rule. Hopefully that answers your main question! If you remove that field, you can run this SQL as-is in a SQL client and get a complete list of the duplicates it would return.



          To further clarify - unlike "regular" rules which are the result of several queries, each with their own weight - this runs a SINGLE query, and sets the weight equal to the rule's threshold. So it's a straight yes/no answer whether a record is a duplicate, based on whether the SQL finds them.



          That's not to say that you can't simulate length/weight, but it's tricky. My org.agbu.optimizeddedupe rule has a SQL statement you can look at which gives the same results as this rule:



          enter image description here



          However, it took about 5 seconds to compare even a single submitted contact against the existing 165,000 contacts in this databse with the existing rule. Now it's almost instantaneous.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks. Good lord...

            – Demerit
            2 days ago











          • Jon G - that's all very interesting, but a bit beyond me. I don't think I need to optimize my own dedupe rules and I know I can make my own rules supervised or unsupervised and leave the prefigured rules unused as general. What I was trying to do was understand the weights/thresholds for the preconfigured rules. I don't see any values in the code etc that you have pointed to, so do they still come from the queries that Deremit has provided. They are certain;y compatible with the results that I see.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago











          • I'm still a bit confused as I'm not that good at reading the code, though I can work out enough see that these rules are treated a special case. I can't see any values for length, weight or threshold there so still don't know the actual criteria for considering contacts to be duplicate under these rules. Or is some different algorithm used. Given that I have a relatively small number of contacts, I can just ditch the pre-configured rules and use my own (less efficient) ones. But it would be nice to know the criteria used in order to understand why some duplicates have been created.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago












          • @MickKahn I just updated my answer, hopefully it makes things clearer!

            – Jon G - Megaphone Tech
            2 days ago











          • Thanks Jon - I don't understand it all, but see that my answer is not helpful so will delete that. I'm seeing some other unexpected results, but can acheive what I need with my own rules, so will move on to other things for now.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago















          4














          Demerit's and Mick's answers are incorrect for the (built-in) reserved rules - though it's definitely confusing!



          If a RuleGroup has a value in the name field, and that name corresponds to a filename in CRM/Dedupe/BAO/QueryBuilder, then the customized SQL in those files will be used. The existing entries in civicrm_rule for those RuleGroups are holdovers from before that system existed, and editing them has no effect.



          "Standard" dedupe rules with multiple criteria are very inefficient compared to handwritten SQL, which is why this is a valuable technique. You can create your own handwritten queries with hook_civicrm_dedupe, and the Veda dedupe extension has a number of excellent examples. Note that this extension doesn't work on modern Civi because of some of its other functions, but the dedupe rules can be ripped out into something else.



          Finally - I learned just yesterday that the built-in handwritten dedupe rules seem to execute different SQL when comparing in Unsupervised/Supervised mode (a single contact) vs. General mode (find all dupes). While I haven't proved it, I suspect that if you're in the rare scenario of needing to optimize your unsupervised/supervised dedupes, creating a new class to extend CRM_Dedupe_BAO_QueryBuilder is the way to go. I just posted org.agbu.optimizeddedupe to provide an example of this.



          UPDATE: More clarification.



          To understand how the queries work, it's best to look at an example, eg IndividualUnsupervised.php.



          The internal function is used if you go to Contacts » Find and Merge Duplicate Contacts and click Use Rule. The SQL query is:





           SELECT contact1.id as id1, contact2.id as id2, $rg->threshold as weight
          FROM civicrm_contact as contact1
          JOIN civicrm_email as email1 ON email1.contact_id=contact1.id
          JOIN civicrm_contact as contact2 ON
          contact1.first_name = contact2.first_name AND
          contact1.last_name = contact2.last_name
          JOIN civicrm_email as email2 ON
          email2.contact_id=contact2.id AND
          email1.email=email2.email
          WHERE contact1.contact_type = 'Individual'"


          First, note that the weight is set to $rg->threshold - that is, the threshold in civicrm_rule_group. In other words, if this SQL matches, these records automatically meet the threshold for that rule. Hopefully that answers your main question! If you remove that field, you can run this SQL as-is in a SQL client and get a complete list of the duplicates it would return.



          To further clarify - unlike "regular" rules which are the result of several queries, each with their own weight - this runs a SINGLE query, and sets the weight equal to the rule's threshold. So it's a straight yes/no answer whether a record is a duplicate, based on whether the SQL finds them.



          That's not to say that you can't simulate length/weight, but it's tricky. My org.agbu.optimizeddedupe rule has a SQL statement you can look at which gives the same results as this rule:



          enter image description here



          However, it took about 5 seconds to compare even a single submitted contact against the existing 165,000 contacts in this databse with the existing rule. Now it's almost instantaneous.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Thanks. Good lord...

            – Demerit
            2 days ago











          • Jon G - that's all very interesting, but a bit beyond me. I don't think I need to optimize my own dedupe rules and I know I can make my own rules supervised or unsupervised and leave the prefigured rules unused as general. What I was trying to do was understand the weights/thresholds for the preconfigured rules. I don't see any values in the code etc that you have pointed to, so do they still come from the queries that Deremit has provided. They are certain;y compatible with the results that I see.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago











          • I'm still a bit confused as I'm not that good at reading the code, though I can work out enough see that these rules are treated a special case. I can't see any values for length, weight or threshold there so still don't know the actual criteria for considering contacts to be duplicate under these rules. Or is some different algorithm used. Given that I have a relatively small number of contacts, I can just ditch the pre-configured rules and use my own (less efficient) ones. But it would be nice to know the criteria used in order to understand why some duplicates have been created.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago












          • @MickKahn I just updated my answer, hopefully it makes things clearer!

            – Jon G - Megaphone Tech
            2 days ago











          • Thanks Jon - I don't understand it all, but see that my answer is not helpful so will delete that. I'm seeing some other unexpected results, but can acheive what I need with my own rules, so will move on to other things for now.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago













          4












          4








          4







          Demerit's and Mick's answers are incorrect for the (built-in) reserved rules - though it's definitely confusing!



          If a RuleGroup has a value in the name field, and that name corresponds to a filename in CRM/Dedupe/BAO/QueryBuilder, then the customized SQL in those files will be used. The existing entries in civicrm_rule for those RuleGroups are holdovers from before that system existed, and editing them has no effect.



          "Standard" dedupe rules with multiple criteria are very inefficient compared to handwritten SQL, which is why this is a valuable technique. You can create your own handwritten queries with hook_civicrm_dedupe, and the Veda dedupe extension has a number of excellent examples. Note that this extension doesn't work on modern Civi because of some of its other functions, but the dedupe rules can be ripped out into something else.



          Finally - I learned just yesterday that the built-in handwritten dedupe rules seem to execute different SQL when comparing in Unsupervised/Supervised mode (a single contact) vs. General mode (find all dupes). While I haven't proved it, I suspect that if you're in the rare scenario of needing to optimize your unsupervised/supervised dedupes, creating a new class to extend CRM_Dedupe_BAO_QueryBuilder is the way to go. I just posted org.agbu.optimizeddedupe to provide an example of this.



          UPDATE: More clarification.



          To understand how the queries work, it's best to look at an example, eg IndividualUnsupervised.php.



          The internal function is used if you go to Contacts » Find and Merge Duplicate Contacts and click Use Rule. The SQL query is:





           SELECT contact1.id as id1, contact2.id as id2, $rg->threshold as weight
          FROM civicrm_contact as contact1
          JOIN civicrm_email as email1 ON email1.contact_id=contact1.id
          JOIN civicrm_contact as contact2 ON
          contact1.first_name = contact2.first_name AND
          contact1.last_name = contact2.last_name
          JOIN civicrm_email as email2 ON
          email2.contact_id=contact2.id AND
          email1.email=email2.email
          WHERE contact1.contact_type = 'Individual'"


          First, note that the weight is set to $rg->threshold - that is, the threshold in civicrm_rule_group. In other words, if this SQL matches, these records automatically meet the threshold for that rule. Hopefully that answers your main question! If you remove that field, you can run this SQL as-is in a SQL client and get a complete list of the duplicates it would return.



          To further clarify - unlike "regular" rules which are the result of several queries, each with their own weight - this runs a SINGLE query, and sets the weight equal to the rule's threshold. So it's a straight yes/no answer whether a record is a duplicate, based on whether the SQL finds them.



          That's not to say that you can't simulate length/weight, but it's tricky. My org.agbu.optimizeddedupe rule has a SQL statement you can look at which gives the same results as this rule:



          enter image description here



          However, it took about 5 seconds to compare even a single submitted contact against the existing 165,000 contacts in this databse with the existing rule. Now it's almost instantaneous.






          share|improve this answer















          Demerit's and Mick's answers are incorrect for the (built-in) reserved rules - though it's definitely confusing!



          If a RuleGroup has a value in the name field, and that name corresponds to a filename in CRM/Dedupe/BAO/QueryBuilder, then the customized SQL in those files will be used. The existing entries in civicrm_rule for those RuleGroups are holdovers from before that system existed, and editing them has no effect.



          "Standard" dedupe rules with multiple criteria are very inefficient compared to handwritten SQL, which is why this is a valuable technique. You can create your own handwritten queries with hook_civicrm_dedupe, and the Veda dedupe extension has a number of excellent examples. Note that this extension doesn't work on modern Civi because of some of its other functions, but the dedupe rules can be ripped out into something else.



          Finally - I learned just yesterday that the built-in handwritten dedupe rules seem to execute different SQL when comparing in Unsupervised/Supervised mode (a single contact) vs. General mode (find all dupes). While I haven't proved it, I suspect that if you're in the rare scenario of needing to optimize your unsupervised/supervised dedupes, creating a new class to extend CRM_Dedupe_BAO_QueryBuilder is the way to go. I just posted org.agbu.optimizeddedupe to provide an example of this.



          UPDATE: More clarification.



          To understand how the queries work, it's best to look at an example, eg IndividualUnsupervised.php.



          The internal function is used if you go to Contacts » Find and Merge Duplicate Contacts and click Use Rule. The SQL query is:





           SELECT contact1.id as id1, contact2.id as id2, $rg->threshold as weight
          FROM civicrm_contact as contact1
          JOIN civicrm_email as email1 ON email1.contact_id=contact1.id
          JOIN civicrm_contact as contact2 ON
          contact1.first_name = contact2.first_name AND
          contact1.last_name = contact2.last_name
          JOIN civicrm_email as email2 ON
          email2.contact_id=contact2.id AND
          email1.email=email2.email
          WHERE contact1.contact_type = 'Individual'"


          First, note that the weight is set to $rg->threshold - that is, the threshold in civicrm_rule_group. In other words, if this SQL matches, these records automatically meet the threshold for that rule. Hopefully that answers your main question! If you remove that field, you can run this SQL as-is in a SQL client and get a complete list of the duplicates it would return.



          To further clarify - unlike "regular" rules which are the result of several queries, each with their own weight - this runs a SINGLE query, and sets the weight equal to the rule's threshold. So it's a straight yes/no answer whether a record is a duplicate, based on whether the SQL finds them.



          That's not to say that you can't simulate length/weight, but it's tricky. My org.agbu.optimizeddedupe rule has a SQL statement you can look at which gives the same results as this rule:



          enter image description here



          However, it took about 5 seconds to compare even a single submitted contact against the existing 165,000 contacts in this databse with the existing rule. Now it's almost instantaneous.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered 2 days ago









          Jon G - Megaphone TechJon G - Megaphone Tech

          27.5k11872




          27.5k11872












          • Thanks. Good lord...

            – Demerit
            2 days ago











          • Jon G - that's all very interesting, but a bit beyond me. I don't think I need to optimize my own dedupe rules and I know I can make my own rules supervised or unsupervised and leave the prefigured rules unused as general. What I was trying to do was understand the weights/thresholds for the preconfigured rules. I don't see any values in the code etc that you have pointed to, so do they still come from the queries that Deremit has provided. They are certain;y compatible with the results that I see.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago











          • I'm still a bit confused as I'm not that good at reading the code, though I can work out enough see that these rules are treated a special case. I can't see any values for length, weight or threshold there so still don't know the actual criteria for considering contacts to be duplicate under these rules. Or is some different algorithm used. Given that I have a relatively small number of contacts, I can just ditch the pre-configured rules and use my own (less efficient) ones. But it would be nice to know the criteria used in order to understand why some duplicates have been created.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago












          • @MickKahn I just updated my answer, hopefully it makes things clearer!

            – Jon G - Megaphone Tech
            2 days ago











          • Thanks Jon - I don't understand it all, but see that my answer is not helpful so will delete that. I'm seeing some other unexpected results, but can acheive what I need with my own rules, so will move on to other things for now.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago

















          • Thanks. Good lord...

            – Demerit
            2 days ago











          • Jon G - that's all very interesting, but a bit beyond me. I don't think I need to optimize my own dedupe rules and I know I can make my own rules supervised or unsupervised and leave the prefigured rules unused as general. What I was trying to do was understand the weights/thresholds for the preconfigured rules. I don't see any values in the code etc that you have pointed to, so do they still come from the queries that Deremit has provided. They are certain;y compatible with the results that I see.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago











          • I'm still a bit confused as I'm not that good at reading the code, though I can work out enough see that these rules are treated a special case. I can't see any values for length, weight or threshold there so still don't know the actual criteria for considering contacts to be duplicate under these rules. Or is some different algorithm used. Given that I have a relatively small number of contacts, I can just ditch the pre-configured rules and use my own (less efficient) ones. But it would be nice to know the criteria used in order to understand why some duplicates have been created.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago












          • @MickKahn I just updated my answer, hopefully it makes things clearer!

            – Jon G - Megaphone Tech
            2 days ago











          • Thanks Jon - I don't understand it all, but see that my answer is not helpful so will delete that. I'm seeing some other unexpected results, but can acheive what I need with my own rules, so will move on to other things for now.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago
















          Thanks. Good lord...

          – Demerit
          2 days ago





          Thanks. Good lord...

          – Demerit
          2 days ago













          Jon G - that's all very interesting, but a bit beyond me. I don't think I need to optimize my own dedupe rules and I know I can make my own rules supervised or unsupervised and leave the prefigured rules unused as general. What I was trying to do was understand the weights/thresholds for the preconfigured rules. I don't see any values in the code etc that you have pointed to, so do they still come from the queries that Deremit has provided. They are certain;y compatible with the results that I see.

          – Mick Kahn
          2 days ago





          Jon G - that's all very interesting, but a bit beyond me. I don't think I need to optimize my own dedupe rules and I know I can make my own rules supervised or unsupervised and leave the prefigured rules unused as general. What I was trying to do was understand the weights/thresholds for the preconfigured rules. I don't see any values in the code etc that you have pointed to, so do they still come from the queries that Deremit has provided. They are certain;y compatible with the results that I see.

          – Mick Kahn
          2 days ago













          I'm still a bit confused as I'm not that good at reading the code, though I can work out enough see that these rules are treated a special case. I can't see any values for length, weight or threshold there so still don't know the actual criteria for considering contacts to be duplicate under these rules. Or is some different algorithm used. Given that I have a relatively small number of contacts, I can just ditch the pre-configured rules and use my own (less efficient) ones. But it would be nice to know the criteria used in order to understand why some duplicates have been created.

          – Mick Kahn
          2 days ago






          I'm still a bit confused as I'm not that good at reading the code, though I can work out enough see that these rules are treated a special case. I can't see any values for length, weight or threshold there so still don't know the actual criteria for considering contacts to be duplicate under these rules. Or is some different algorithm used. Given that I have a relatively small number of contacts, I can just ditch the pre-configured rules and use my own (less efficient) ones. But it would be nice to know the criteria used in order to understand why some duplicates have been created.

          – Mick Kahn
          2 days ago














          @MickKahn I just updated my answer, hopefully it makes things clearer!

          – Jon G - Megaphone Tech
          2 days ago





          @MickKahn I just updated my answer, hopefully it makes things clearer!

          – Jon G - Megaphone Tech
          2 days ago













          Thanks Jon - I don't understand it all, but see that my answer is not helpful so will delete that. I'm seeing some other unexpected results, but can acheive what I need with my own rules, so will move on to other things for now.

          – Mick Kahn
          2 days ago





          Thanks Jon - I don't understand it all, but see that my answer is not helpful so will delete that. I'm seeing some other unexpected results, but can acheive what I need with my own rules, so will move on to other things for now.

          – Mick Kahn
          2 days ago











          2














          EDIT: This answer is wrong. See Jon's answer. The reserved rules don't use the values in the database they use custom queries.




          If you have access to the database type



          SELECT * from civicrm_dedupe_rule r inner join civicrm_dedupe_rule_group rg on rg.id = r.dedupe_rule_group_id;



          which will give you a table which isn't pretty but is mostly understandable.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Ah you're right. I'll update answer.

            – Demerit
            Apr 4 at 18:19











          • Thanks that tells me what I need, so I have deleted my earlier comment on your previous version of the answer

            – Mick Kahn
            Apr 4 at 20:22











          • The 'green tick' belongs on Jon's answer since the question is about reserved rules.

            – Aidan
            2 days ago











          • I'm taking off the green tick because Deremit has marked the answer as wrong, but (see below), I'm not offering the tick to Jon's answer yet as it doesn't fully answer my question.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago















          2














          EDIT: This answer is wrong. See Jon's answer. The reserved rules don't use the values in the database they use custom queries.




          If you have access to the database type



          SELECT * from civicrm_dedupe_rule r inner join civicrm_dedupe_rule_group rg on rg.id = r.dedupe_rule_group_id;



          which will give you a table which isn't pretty but is mostly understandable.






          share|improve this answer

























          • Ah you're right. I'll update answer.

            – Demerit
            Apr 4 at 18:19











          • Thanks that tells me what I need, so I have deleted my earlier comment on your previous version of the answer

            – Mick Kahn
            Apr 4 at 20:22











          • The 'green tick' belongs on Jon's answer since the question is about reserved rules.

            – Aidan
            2 days ago











          • I'm taking off the green tick because Deremit has marked the answer as wrong, but (see below), I'm not offering the tick to Jon's answer yet as it doesn't fully answer my question.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago













          2












          2








          2







          EDIT: This answer is wrong. See Jon's answer. The reserved rules don't use the values in the database they use custom queries.




          If you have access to the database type



          SELECT * from civicrm_dedupe_rule r inner join civicrm_dedupe_rule_group rg on rg.id = r.dedupe_rule_group_id;



          which will give you a table which isn't pretty but is mostly understandable.






          share|improve this answer















          EDIT: This answer is wrong. See Jon's answer. The reserved rules don't use the values in the database they use custom queries.




          If you have access to the database type



          SELECT * from civicrm_dedupe_rule r inner join civicrm_dedupe_rule_group rg on rg.id = r.dedupe_rule_group_id;



          which will give you a table which isn't pretty but is mostly understandable.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered Apr 4 at 17:35









          DemeritDemerit

          4,0612621




          4,0612621












          • Ah you're right. I'll update answer.

            – Demerit
            Apr 4 at 18:19











          • Thanks that tells me what I need, so I have deleted my earlier comment on your previous version of the answer

            – Mick Kahn
            Apr 4 at 20:22











          • The 'green tick' belongs on Jon's answer since the question is about reserved rules.

            – Aidan
            2 days ago











          • I'm taking off the green tick because Deremit has marked the answer as wrong, but (see below), I'm not offering the tick to Jon's answer yet as it doesn't fully answer my question.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago

















          • Ah you're right. I'll update answer.

            – Demerit
            Apr 4 at 18:19











          • Thanks that tells me what I need, so I have deleted my earlier comment on your previous version of the answer

            – Mick Kahn
            Apr 4 at 20:22











          • The 'green tick' belongs on Jon's answer since the question is about reserved rules.

            – Aidan
            2 days ago











          • I'm taking off the green tick because Deremit has marked the answer as wrong, but (see below), I'm not offering the tick to Jon's answer yet as it doesn't fully answer my question.

            – Mick Kahn
            2 days ago
















          Ah you're right. I'll update answer.

          – Demerit
          Apr 4 at 18:19





          Ah you're right. I'll update answer.

          – Demerit
          Apr 4 at 18:19













          Thanks that tells me what I need, so I have deleted my earlier comment on your previous version of the answer

          – Mick Kahn
          Apr 4 at 20:22





          Thanks that tells me what I need, so I have deleted my earlier comment on your previous version of the answer

          – Mick Kahn
          Apr 4 at 20:22













          The 'green tick' belongs on Jon's answer since the question is about reserved rules.

          – Aidan
          2 days ago





          The 'green tick' belongs on Jon's answer since the question is about reserved rules.

          – Aidan
          2 days ago













          I'm taking off the green tick because Deremit has marked the answer as wrong, but (see below), I'm not offering the tick to Jon's answer yet as it doesn't fully answer my question.

          – Mick Kahn
          2 days ago





          I'm taking off the green tick because Deremit has marked the answer as wrong, but (see below), I'm not offering the tick to Jon's answer yet as it doesn't fully answer my question.

          – Mick Kahn
          2 days ago

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to CiviCRM Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcivicrm.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f29155%2freserved-de-dupe-rules%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          Àrd-bhaile Cathair chruinne/Baile mòr cruinne | Artagailean ceangailte | Clàr-taice na seòladaireachd

          대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

          Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition