Is it possible to static_assert that a lambda is not generic?Can we get the type of a lambda argument?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?What is a lambda expression in C++11?Compiling with gcc fails if using lambda function for QObject::connect()c++11 - getting result_of, decltype, std::function and variadic templates working togetherTemplate Type Deduction with LambdasVariadic template method and std::function - compilation errorRecursively visiting an `std::variant` using lambdas and fixed-point combinatorsClang can't find template binary operator in fold expressionGenerating lambda from class templateGetting active value in std::visit without knowing which value is active
Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file
Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?
Revoked SSL certificate
How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?
Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?
If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?
Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?
Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?
What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?
What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?
A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?
Modeling an IP Address
Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?
RSA: Danger of using p to create q
Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each
dbcc cleantable batch size explanation
Could an aircraft fly or hover using only jets of compressed air?
Why can't we play rap on piano?
How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?
LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands?
I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months
Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?
Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?
infared filters v nd
Is it possible to static_assert that a lambda is not generic?
Can we get the type of a lambda argument?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?What is a lambda expression in C++11?Compiling with gcc fails if using lambda function for QObject::connect()c++11 - getting result_of, decltype, std::function and variadic templates working togetherTemplate Type Deduction with LambdasVariadic template method and std::function - compilation errorRecursively visiting an `std::variant` using lambdas and fixed-point combinatorsClang can't find template binary operator in fold expressionGenerating lambda from class templateGetting active value in std::visit without knowing which value is active
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;
I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom
This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)
) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert()
about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t
tests on int
and std::string
and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol()
on int
and string
.
c++ c++17 variadic-templates template-meta-programming generic-lambda
add a comment |
I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom
This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)
) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert()
about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t
tests on int
and std::string
and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol()
on int
and string
.
c++ c++17 variadic-templates template-meta-programming generic-lambda
1
What if the functor has an overloadedoperator()
? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?
– Max Langhof
2 days ago
I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.
– NoSenseEtAl
2 days ago
add a comment |
I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom
This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)
) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert()
about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t
tests on int
and std::string
and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol()
on int
and string
.
c++ c++17 variadic-templates template-meta-programming generic-lambda
I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom
This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)
) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert()
about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t
tests on int
and std::string
and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol()
on int
and string
.
c++ c++17 variadic-templates template-meta-programming generic-lambda
c++ c++17 variadic-templates template-meta-programming generic-lambda
edited 2 days ago
max66
38.9k74574
38.9k74574
asked 2 days ago
NoSenseEtAlNoSenseEtAl
7,7031677184
7,7031677184
1
What if the functor has an overloadedoperator()
? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?
– Max Langhof
2 days ago
I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.
– NoSenseEtAl
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
What if the functor has an overloadedoperator()
? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?
– Max Langhof
2 days ago
I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.
– NoSenseEtAl
2 days ago
1
1
What if the functor has an overloaded
operator()
? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?– Max Langhof
2 days ago
What if the functor has an overloaded
operator()
? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?– Max Langhof
2 days ago
I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.
– NoSenseEtAl
2 days ago
I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.
– NoSenseEtAl
2 days ago
add a comment |
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?
I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator()
type.
Follows an example
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto foo (T const &)
-> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
return true;
constexpr bool foo (...)
return false;
int main()
auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;
static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );
Instead of a bool
, you can return std::true_type
(from foo()
first version) or std::false_type
(from second version) if you want to use it through decltype()
.
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.
But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()
s: when there is a single, non template, operator()
, you should get 1
from foo()
; otherwise (no operator()
, more than one operator()
, template operator()
), foo()
should return 0
.
2
Trying to take the address ofoperator()
was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo
– Max Langhof
2 days ago
add a comment |
Yet another simpler option:
#include <type_traits>
...
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
class Auto ;
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
...
The Auto
class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V
parameters. If V
accepts Auto
as an argument it must be a generic.
I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:
Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert
I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)
Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that :auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);
– Martin m
2 days ago
@Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?
– Konrad Rudolph
2 days ago
Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.
– Martin m
2 days ago
4
This gives both false positives (e.g.Visit([](std::any));
) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto));
orVisit([](auto*));
)
– Barry
2 days ago
Visit([](int, auto))
is not a valid case because ofv(std::get<Arg1>(data));
andVisit([](auto*));
is fixed now. I'm not sure ifVisit([](std::any))
is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.
– olivecoder
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template <class U, typename T = void>
struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
else
std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;
template <class T>
void foo(const T& t)
std::cout <<t << " foo n";
void fooi(const int& t)
std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
Visit(foo<int>);
Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
Visit(fooi);
// Visit(foo); // => fail ugly
I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.
I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55488333%2fis-it-possible-to-static-assert-that-a-lambda-is-not-generic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
3 Answers
3
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?
I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator()
type.
Follows an example
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto foo (T const &)
-> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
return true;
constexpr bool foo (...)
return false;
int main()
auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;
static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );
Instead of a bool
, you can return std::true_type
(from foo()
first version) or std::false_type
(from second version) if you want to use it through decltype()
.
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.
But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()
s: when there is a single, non template, operator()
, you should get 1
from foo()
; otherwise (no operator()
, more than one operator()
, template operator()
), foo()
should return 0
.
2
Trying to take the address ofoperator()
was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo
– Max Langhof
2 days ago
add a comment |
Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?
I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator()
type.
Follows an example
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto foo (T const &)
-> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
return true;
constexpr bool foo (...)
return false;
int main()
auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;
static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );
Instead of a bool
, you can return std::true_type
(from foo()
first version) or std::false_type
(from second version) if you want to use it through decltype()
.
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.
But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()
s: when there is a single, non template, operator()
, you should get 1
from foo()
; otherwise (no operator()
, more than one operator()
, template operator()
), foo()
should return 0
.
2
Trying to take the address ofoperator()
was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo
– Max Langhof
2 days ago
add a comment |
Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?
I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator()
type.
Follows an example
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto foo (T const &)
-> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
return true;
constexpr bool foo (...)
return false;
int main()
auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;
static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );
Instead of a bool
, you can return std::true_type
(from foo()
first version) or std::false_type
(from second version) if you want to use it through decltype()
.
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.
But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()
s: when there is a single, non template, operator()
, you should get 1
from foo()
; otherwise (no operator()
, more than one operator()
, template operator()
), foo()
should return 0
.
Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?
I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator()
type.
Follows an example
#include <type_traits>
template <typename T>
constexpr auto foo (T const &)
-> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
return true;
constexpr bool foo (...)
return false;
int main()
auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;
static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );
Instead of a bool
, you can return std::true_type
(from foo()
first version) or std::false_type
(from second version) if you want to use it through decltype()
.
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.
I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.
But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()
s: when there is a single, non template, operator()
, you should get 1
from foo()
; otherwise (no operator()
, more than one operator()
, template operator()
), foo()
should return 0
.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
max66max66
38.9k74574
38.9k74574
2
Trying to take the address ofoperator()
was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo
– Max Langhof
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
Trying to take the address ofoperator()
was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo
– Max Langhof
2 days ago
2
2
Trying to take the address of
operator()
was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo– Max Langhof
2 days ago
Trying to take the address of
operator()
was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo– Max Langhof
2 days ago
add a comment |
Yet another simpler option:
#include <type_traits>
...
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
class Auto ;
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
...
The Auto
class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V
parameters. If V
accepts Auto
as an argument it must be a generic.
I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:
Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert
I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)
Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that :auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);
– Martin m
2 days ago
@Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?
– Konrad Rudolph
2 days ago
Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.
– Martin m
2 days ago
4
This gives both false positives (e.g.Visit([](std::any));
) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto));
orVisit([](auto*));
)
– Barry
2 days ago
Visit([](int, auto))
is not a valid case because ofv(std::get<Arg1>(data));
andVisit([](auto*));
is fixed now. I'm not sure ifVisit([](std::any))
is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.
– olivecoder
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
Yet another simpler option:
#include <type_traits>
...
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
class Auto ;
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
...
The Auto
class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V
parameters. If V
accepts Auto
as an argument it must be a generic.
I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:
Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert
I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)
Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that :auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);
– Martin m
2 days ago
@Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?
– Konrad Rudolph
2 days ago
Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.
– Martin m
2 days ago
4
This gives both false positives (e.g.Visit([](std::any));
) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto));
orVisit([](auto*));
)
– Barry
2 days ago
Visit([](int, auto))
is not a valid case because ofv(std::get<Arg1>(data));
andVisit([](auto*));
is fixed now. I'm not sure ifVisit([](std::any))
is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.
– olivecoder
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
Yet another simpler option:
#include <type_traits>
...
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
class Auto ;
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
...
The Auto
class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V
parameters. If V
accepts Auto
as an argument it must be a generic.
I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:
Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert
I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)
Yet another simpler option:
#include <type_traits>
...
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
class Auto ;
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
...
The Auto
class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V
parameters. If V
accepts Auto
as an argument it must be a generic.
I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:
Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert
I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
olivecoderolivecoder
2,0781216
2,0781216
Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that :auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);
– Martin m
2 days ago
@Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?
– Konrad Rudolph
2 days ago
Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.
– Martin m
2 days ago
4
This gives both false positives (e.g.Visit([](std::any));
) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto));
orVisit([](auto*));
)
– Barry
2 days ago
Visit([](int, auto))
is not a valid case because ofv(std::get<Arg1>(data));
andVisit([](auto*));
is fixed now. I'm not sure ifVisit([](std::any))
is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.
– olivecoder
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that :auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);
– Martin m
2 days ago
@Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?
– Konrad Rudolph
2 days ago
Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.
– Martin m
2 days ago
4
This gives both false positives (e.g.Visit([](std::any));
) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto));
orVisit([](auto*));
)
– Barry
2 days ago
Visit([](int, auto))
is not a valid case because ofv(std::get<Arg1>(data));
andVisit([](auto*));
is fixed now. I'm not sure ifVisit([](std::any))
is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.
– olivecoder
2 days ago
Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that :
auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);
– Martin m
2 days ago
Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that :
auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);
– Martin m
2 days ago
@Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?
– Konrad Rudolph
2 days ago
@Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?
– Konrad Rudolph
2 days ago
Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.
– Martin m
2 days ago
Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.
– Martin m
2 days ago
4
4
This gives both false positives (e.g.
Visit([](std::any));
) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto));
or Visit([](auto*));
)– Barry
2 days ago
This gives both false positives (e.g.
Visit([](std::any));
) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto));
or Visit([](auto*));
)– Barry
2 days ago
Visit([](int, auto))
is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
and Visit([](auto*));
is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any))
is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.– olivecoder
2 days ago
Visit([](int, auto))
is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
and Visit([](auto*));
is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any))
is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.– olivecoder
2 days ago
|
show 4 more comments
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template <class U, typename T = void>
struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
else
std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;
template <class T>
void foo(const T& t)
std::cout <<t << " foo n";
void fooi(const int& t)
std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
Visit(foo<int>);
Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
Visit(fooi);
// Visit(foo); // => fail ugly
I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.
I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.
add a comment |
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template <class U, typename T = void>
struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
else
std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;
template <class T>
void foo(const T& t)
std::cout <<t << " foo n";
void fooi(const int& t)
std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
Visit(foo<int>);
Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
Visit(fooi);
// Visit(foo); // => fail ugly
I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.
I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.
add a comment |
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template <class U, typename T = void>
struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
else
std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;
template <class T>
void foo(const T& t)
std::cout <<t << " foo n";
void fooi(const int& t)
std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
Visit(foo<int>);
Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
Visit(fooi);
// Visit(foo); // => fail ugly
I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.
I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.
#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>
template <class U, typename T = void>
struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;
template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;
template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));
template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);
template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);
template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));
std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;
v(std::get<Arg1>(data));
else
std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;
template <class T>
void foo(const T& t)
std::cout <<t << " foo n";
void fooi(const int& t)
std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;
int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
Visit(foo<int>);
Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
Visit(fooi);
// Visit(foo); // => fail ugly
I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.
I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.
answered 2 days ago
Martin mMartin m
885
885
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55488333%2fis-it-possible-to-static-assert-that-a-lambda-is-not-generic%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
What if the functor has an overloaded
operator()
? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?– Max Langhof
2 days ago
I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.
– NoSenseEtAl
2 days ago