Is it possible to static_assert that a lambda is not generic?Can we get the type of a lambda argument?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?What is a lambda expression in C++11?Compiling with gcc fails if using lambda function for QObject::connect()c++11 - getting result_of, decltype, std::function and variadic templates working togetherTemplate Type Deduction with LambdasVariadic template method and std::function - compilation errorRecursively visiting an `std::variant` using lambdas and fixed-point combinatorsClang can't find template binary operator in fold expressionGenerating lambda from class templateGetting active value in std::visit without knowing which value is active

Replacing matching entries in one column of a file by another column from a different file

Why doesn't Newton's third law mean a person bounces back to where they started when they hit the ground?

Revoked SSL certificate

How does quantile regression compare to logistic regression with the variable split at the quantile?

Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Why can't I see bouncing of a switch on an oscilloscope?

Is it possible to do 50 km distance without any previous training?

What defenses are there against being summoned by the Gate spell?

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

A newer friend of my brother's gave him a load of baseball cards that are supposedly extremely valuable. Is this a scam?

Modeling an IP Address

Are the number of citations and number of published articles the most important criteria for a tenure promotion?

RSA: Danger of using p to create q

Intersection point of 2 lines defined by 2 points each

dbcc cleantable batch size explanation

Could an aircraft fly or hover using only jets of compressed air?

Why can't we play rap on piano?

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?

LaTeX: Why are digits allowed in environments, but forbidden in commands?

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

Why is 150k or 200k jobs considered good when there's 300k+ births a month?

infared filters v nd



Is it possible to static_assert that a lambda is not generic?


Can we get the type of a lambda argument?Is it possible to write a template to check for a function's existence?What is a lambda expression in C++11?Compiling with gcc fails if using lambda function for QObject::connect()c++11 - getting result_of, decltype, std::function and variadic templates working togetherTemplate Type Deduction with LambdasVariadic template method and std::function - compilation errorRecursively visiting an `std::variant` using lambdas and fixed-point combinatorsClang can't find template binary operator in fold expressionGenerating lambda from class templateGetting active value in std::visit without knowing which value is active






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








10















I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example



#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom



This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert() about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.



Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t tests on int and std::string and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol() on int and string.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

    – Max Langhof
    2 days ago












  • I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

    – NoSenseEtAl
    2 days ago

















10















I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example



#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom



This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert() about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.



Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t tests on int and std::string and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol() on int and string.










share|improve this question



















  • 1





    What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

    – Max Langhof
    2 days ago












  • I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

    – NoSenseEtAl
    2 days ago













10












10








10


2






I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example



#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom



This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert() about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.



Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t tests on int and std::string and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol() on int and string.










share|improve this question
















I implemented a Visit function (on a variant) that checks that the currently active type in the variant matches the function signature (more precisely the first argument). Based on this nice answer.
For example



#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))
std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << "n"; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << "n"; );
// Visit([](auto& x)); ugly kabooom



This works, but it explodes with a user unfriendly compile time error when users passes a generic (e.g. [](auto&)) lambda. Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert() about it?
Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.



Note that I do not know what possible lambdas do, so I can not do some clever stuff with Dummy types since lambdas may invoke arbitrary functions on types.
In other words I can not try to call lambda in 2 std::void_t tests on int and std::string and if it works assume it is generic because they might try to call .BlaLol() on int and string.







c++ c++17 variadic-templates template-meta-programming generic-lambda






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









max66

38.9k74574




38.9k74574










asked 2 days ago









NoSenseEtAlNoSenseEtAl

7,7031677184




7,7031677184







  • 1





    What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

    – Max Langhof
    2 days ago












  • I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

    – NoSenseEtAl
    2 days ago












  • 1





    What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

    – Max Langhof
    2 days ago












  • I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

    – NoSenseEtAl
    2 days ago







1




1





What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

– Max Langhof
2 days ago






What if the functor has an overloaded operator()? Visiting is also very commonly performed with overloaded functors (see example 4 here), do those have to be forbidden (or have to work)?

– Max Langhof
2 days ago














I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

– NoSenseEtAl
2 days ago





I think that is too hard to handle, but if it can be done that would be nice... so it is optional, not required.

– NoSenseEtAl
2 days ago












3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















11















Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



Follows an example



#include <type_traits>

template <typename T>
constexpr auto foo (T const &)
-> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
return true;

constexpr bool foo (...)
return false;

int main()

auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.






share|improve this answer




















  • 2





    Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

    – Max Langhof
    2 days ago



















4














Yet another simpler option:



#include <type_traits>
...
template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
class Auto ;
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
...



The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)






share|improve this answer

























  • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

    – Martin m
    2 days ago












  • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

    – Konrad Rudolph
    2 days ago











  • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

    – Martin m
    2 days ago






  • 4





    This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

    – Barry
    2 days ago












  • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

    – olivecoder
    2 days ago



















3














#include <variant>
#include <string>
#include <iostream>

template <class U, typename T = void>
struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

template <typename U>
struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

template <typename F>
decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

template <typename T>
using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


template <typename V>
void Visit(V v)
if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
return;

v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

else

std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





template <class T>
void foo(const T& t)

std::cout <<t << " foo n";


void fooi(const int& t)

std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


int main()
Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
Visit(foo<int>);

Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
Visit(fooi);


// Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.






share|improve this answer























    Your Answer






    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
    StackExchange.snippets.init();
    );
    );
    , "code-snippets");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "1"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55488333%2fis-it-possible-to-static-assert-that-a-lambda-is-not-generic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes








    3 Answers
    3






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    11















    Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




    I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



    Follows an example



    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto foo (T const &)
    -> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
    return true;

    constexpr bool foo (...)
    return false;

    int main()

    auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
    auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

    static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
    static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



    Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




    Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




    I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



    But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

      – Max Langhof
      2 days ago
















    11















    Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




    I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



    Follows an example



    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto foo (T const &)
    -> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
    return true;

    constexpr bool foo (...)
    return false;

    int main()

    auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
    auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

    static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
    static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



    Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




    Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




    I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



    But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

      – Max Langhof
      2 days ago














    11












    11








    11








    Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




    I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



    Follows an example



    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto foo (T const &)
    -> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
    return true;

    constexpr bool foo (...)
    return false;

    int main()

    auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
    auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

    static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
    static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



    Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




    Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




    I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



    But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.






    share|improve this answer
















    Is there a way to detect this and give nice static_assert about it?




    I suppose you can use SFINAE over operator() type.



    Follows an example



    #include <type_traits>

    template <typename T>
    constexpr auto foo (T const &)
    -> decltype( &T::operator(), bool )
    return true;

    constexpr bool foo (...)
    return false;

    int main()

    auto l1 = [](int) return 0; ;
    auto l2 = [](auto) return 0; ;

    static_assert( foo(l1), "!" );
    static_assert( ! foo(l2), "!" );



    Instead of a bool, you can return std::true_type (from foo() first version) or std::false_type (from second version) if you want to use it through decltype().




    Would also be nice if it worked with function templates as well, not just with lambdas.




    I don't think it's possible in a so simple way: a lambda (also a generic lambda) is an object; a template function isn't an object but a set of objects. You can pass an object to a function, not a set of objects.



    But the preceding solution should works also for classes/structs with operator()s: when there is a single, non template, operator(), you should get 1 from foo(); otherwise (no operator(), more than one operator(), template operator()), foo() should return 0.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    max66max66

    38.9k74574




    38.9k74574







    • 2





      Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

      – Max Langhof
      2 days ago













    • 2





      Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

      – Max Langhof
      2 days ago








    2




    2





    Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

    – Max Langhof
    2 days ago






    Trying to take the address of operator() was my initial idea as well (hence the comment) but then I somehow got lost in SFINAE on actually calling it. Anyway, here are some extra test cases involving overloaded functors: godbolt.org/z/M319jo

    – Max Langhof
    2 days ago














    4














    Yet another simpler option:



    #include <type_traits>
    ...
    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    class Auto ;
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
    ...



    The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



    I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



    Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


    I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)






    share|improve this answer

























    • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

      – Martin m
      2 days ago












    • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      2 days ago











    • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

      – Martin m
      2 days ago






    • 4





      This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

      – Barry
      2 days ago












    • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

      – olivecoder
      2 days ago
















    4














    Yet another simpler option:



    #include <type_traits>
    ...
    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    class Auto ;
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
    ...



    The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



    I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



    Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


    I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)






    share|improve this answer

























    • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

      – Martin m
      2 days ago












    • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      2 days ago











    • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

      – Martin m
      2 days ago






    • 4





      This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

      – Barry
      2 days ago












    • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

      – olivecoder
      2 days ago














    4












    4








    4







    Yet another simpler option:



    #include <type_traits>
    ...
    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    class Auto ;
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
    ...



    The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



    I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



    Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


    I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)






    share|improve this answer















    Yet another simpler option:



    #include <type_traits>
    ...
    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    class Auto ;
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto&>::value);
    static_assert(!std::is_invocable<V, Auto*>::value);
    ...



    The Auto class is just an invented type impossible to occur in the V parameters. If V accepts Auto as an argument it must be a generic.



    I tested in coliru and I can confirm the solution covers these cases:



    Visit([](auto x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto *x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &x)); // nice static assert
    Visit([](auto &&x)); // nice static assert


    I'm not sure if that would cover all the possible lambdas that you don't know which are :)







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 2 days ago

























    answered 2 days ago









    olivecoderolivecoder

    2,0781216




    2,0781216












    • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

      – Martin m
      2 days ago












    • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      2 days ago











    • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

      – Martin m
      2 days ago






    • 4





      This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

      – Barry
      2 days ago












    • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

      – olivecoder
      2 days ago


















    • Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

      – Martin m
      2 days ago












    • @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

      – Konrad Rudolph
      2 days ago











    • Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

      – Martin m
      2 days ago






    • 4





      This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

      – Barry
      2 days ago












    • Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

      – olivecoder
      2 days ago

















    Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

    – Martin m
    2 days ago






    Nice idea ! You may ensure that "Auto" is unique like that : auto a_lambda = [](); using Auto= decltype(a_lambda);

    – Martin m
    2 days ago














    @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

    – Konrad Rudolph
    2 days ago





    @Martinm This seems to be the idiomatic way but does it actually have an advantage over the code in this answer?

    – Konrad Rudolph
    2 days ago













    Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

    – Martin m
    2 days ago





    Well, I am not sure what happens in the case where an "Auto" class already define somewhere else. In meta-programming context I prefer to be sure that my type cannot be in conflict in some obscure case.

    – Martin m
    2 days ago




    4




    4





    This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

    – Barry
    2 days ago






    This gives both false positives (e.g. Visit([](std::any));) and false negatives (Visit([](int, auto)); or Visit([](auto*));)

    – Barry
    2 days ago














    Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

    – olivecoder
    2 days ago






    Visit([](int, auto)) is not a valid case because of v(std::get<Arg1>(data)); and Visit([](auto*)); is fixed now. I'm not sure if Visit([](std::any)) is one of the cases to be avoided as the question isn't clear enough.

    – olivecoder
    2 days ago












    3














    #include <variant>
    #include <string>
    #include <iostream>

    template <class U, typename T = void>
    struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

    template <typename U>
    struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

    template <typename U>
    struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


    template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
    Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

    template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
    Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

    template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
    Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

    template <typename F>
    decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

    template <typename T>
    using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

    std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


    template <typename V>
    void Visit(V v)
    if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

    using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
    if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

    std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
    return;

    v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

    else

    std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





    template <class T>
    void foo(const T& t)

    std::cout <<t << " foo n";


    void fooi(const int& t)

    std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


    int main()
    Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
    Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
    Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
    Visit(foo<int>);

    Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
    Visit(fooi);


    // Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



    I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



    I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.






    share|improve this answer



























      3














      #include <variant>
      #include <string>
      #include <iostream>

      template <class U, typename T = void>
      struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

      template <typename U>
      struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

      template <typename U>
      struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


      template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
      Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

      template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
      Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

      template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
      Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

      template <typename F>
      decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

      template <typename T>
      using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

      std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


      template <typename V>
      void Visit(V v)
      if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

      using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
      if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

      std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
      return;

      v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

      else

      std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





      template <class T>
      void foo(const T& t)

      std::cout <<t << " foo n";


      void fooi(const int& t)

      std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


      int main()
      Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
      Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
      Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
      Visit(foo<int>);

      Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
      Visit(fooi);


      // Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



      I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



      I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.






      share|improve this answer

























        3












        3








        3







        #include <variant>
        #include <string>
        #include <iostream>

        template <class U, typename T = void>
        struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

        template <typename U>
        struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

        template <typename U>
        struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


        template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

        template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

        template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

        template <typename F>
        decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

        template <typename T>
        using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

        std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


        template <typename V>
        void Visit(V v)
        if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

        using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
        if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

        std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
        return;

        v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

        else

        std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





        template <class T>
        void foo(const T& t)

        std::cout <<t << " foo n";


        void fooi(const int& t)

        std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


        int main()
        Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
        Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
        Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
        Visit(foo<int>);

        Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
        Visit(fooi);


        // Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



        I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



        I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.






        share|improve this answer













        #include <variant>
        #include <string>
        #include <iostream>

        template <class U, typename T = void>
        struct can_be_checked : public std::false_type ;

        template <typename U>
        struct can_be_checked<U, std::enable_if_t< std::is_function<U>::value > > : public std::true_type;

        template <typename U>
        struct can_be_checked<U, std::void_t<decltype(&U::operator())>> : public std::true_type;


        template<typename Ret, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(*) (Arg, Rest...));

        template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...));

        template<typename Ret, typename F, typename Arg, typename... Rest>
        Arg first_argument_helper(Ret(F::*) (Arg, Rest...) const);

        template <typename F>
        decltype(first_argument_helper(&F::operator())) first_argument_helper(F);

        template <typename T>
        using first_argument = decltype(first_argument_helper(std::declval<T>()));

        std::variant<int, std::string> data="abc";


        template <typename V>
        void Visit(V v)
        if constexpr ( can_be_checked<std::remove_pointer_t<decltype(v)>>::value )

        using Arg1 = typename std::remove_const_t<std::remove_reference_t<first_argument<V>>>;//... TMP magic to get 1st argument of visitor + remove cvr, see Q 43526647
        if (! std::holds_alternative<Arg1>(data))

        std::cerr<< "alternative mismatchn";
        return;

        v(std::get<Arg1>(data));

        else

        std::cout << "it's a template / auto lambda " << std::endl;





        template <class T>
        void foo(const T& t)

        std::cout <<t << " foo n";


        void fooi(const int& t)

        std::cout <<t << " fooi " << std::endl;


        int main()
        Visit([](const int& i)std::cout << i << std::endl; );
        Visit([](const std::string& s)std::cout << s << std::endl; );
        Visit([](auto& x)std::cout <<x << std::endl;); // it's a template / auto lambda*/
        Visit(foo<int>);

        Visit<decltype(fooi)>(fooi);
        Visit(fooi);


        // Visit(foo); // => fail ugly



        I don't know if it's you want, but you can, with that static_assert if an auto lambda is passed as parameter.



        I think it's not possible to do the same for template function, but not sure.







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Martin mMartin m

        885




        885



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55488333%2fis-it-possible-to-static-assert-that-a-lambda-is-not-generic%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Àrd-bhaile Cathair chruinne/Baile mòr cruinne | Artagailean ceangailte | Clàr-taice na seòladaireachd

            Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition

            대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495