Test whether all array elements are factors of a number The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSearching array reports “not found” even though it's foundPHP: Delete an element from an arrayDeleting array elements in JavaScript - delete vs spliceWhy is setTimeout(fn, 0) sometimes useful?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?Determine whether an array contains a valueGet the first element of an arrayGet all unique values in a JavaScript array (remove duplicates)How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How can I add new array elements at the beginning of an array in Javascript?How does PHP 'foreach' actually work?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Where to refill my bottle in India?

What does "sndry explns" mean in one of the Hitchhiker's guide books?

What is the use of option -o in the useradd command?

In microwave frequencies, do you use a circulator when you need a (near) perfect diode?

How long do I have to send my income tax payment to the IRS?

Realistic Alternatives to Dust: What Else Could Feed a Plankton Bloom?

If the Wish spell is used to duplicate the effect of Simulacrum, are existing duplicates destroyed?

How to make payment on the internet without leaving a money trail?

Adding labels to a table: columns and rows

Could JWST stay at L2 "forever"?

Output the Arecibo Message

What does "rabbited" mean/imply in this sentence?

How to change the limits of integration

Idiomatic way to prevent slicing?

Spanish for "widget"

Access elements in std::string where positon of string is greater than its size

How do you say "canon" as in "official for a story universe"?

aging parents with no investments

What does Linus Torvalds mean when he says that Git "never ever" tracks a file?

What do hard-Brexiteers want with respect to the Irish border?

Flying Bloodthirsty Lampshades

Extreme, unacceptable situation and I can't attend work tomorrow morning

Which Sci-Fi work first showed weapon of galactic-scale mass destruction?



Test whether all array elements are factors of a number



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InSearching array reports “not found” even though it's foundPHP: Delete an element from an arrayDeleting array elements in JavaScript - delete vs spliceWhy is setTimeout(fn, 0) sometimes useful?How do I determine whether an array contains a particular value in Java?Determine whether an array contains a valueGet the first element of an arrayGet all unique values in a JavaScript array (remove duplicates)How do I remove a particular element from an array in JavaScript?How can I add new array elements at the beginning of an array in Javascript?How does PHP 'foreach' actually work?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty height:90px;width:728px;box-sizing:border-box;








7















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    Apr 6 at 13:07







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:09






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    Apr 6 at 13:14






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:18











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    Apr 6 at 18:43


















7















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    Apr 6 at 13:07







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:09






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    Apr 6 at 13:14






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:18











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    Apr 6 at 18:43














7












7








7


1






I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.










share|improve this question
















I have the following question:




Write a function that returns true if all integers in an array are factors of a number, and false otherwise.




I tried the code below:






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





My solution returns true which is wrong. I know it's the else statement that's messing it up. But I want to understand why the else statement can't go there.






function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false





function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
console.log(element)

if (num % element !== 0)
return false

else
return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false






javascript arrays loops if-statement






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Apr 6 at 16:50









isanae

2,55711437




2,55711437










asked Apr 6 at 13:04









PineNuts0PineNuts0

87631432




87631432







  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    Apr 6 at 13:07







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:09






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    Apr 6 at 13:14






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:18











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    Apr 6 at 18:43













  • 2





    You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

    – Icepickle
    Apr 6 at 13:07







  • 2





    FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:09






  • 1





    @t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

    – Jonas Wilms
    Apr 6 at 13:14






  • 2





    @JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

    – T.J. Crowder
    Apr 6 at 13:18











  • @T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

    – Barmar
    Apr 6 at 18:43








2




2





You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

– Icepickle
Apr 6 at 13:07






You should get the return true out of the loop ;) and leave the return false inside the loop :) The reason for it is that otherwise your loop really stops after the first checking, returning either true or false, and you want it to return false as soon as something is not a factor. The return true outside of the loop would then indicate that all numbers supplied where factors of the number argument

– Icepickle
Apr 6 at 13:07





2




2





FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
Apr 6 at 13:09





FYI, it's not just you, this is one of the most common errors people make when they first start out with programming and loops. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
Apr 6 at 13:09




1




1





@t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

– Jonas Wilms
Apr 6 at 13:14





@t.j.crowder yet we don't have a good dupetarget for it.

– Jonas Wilms
Apr 6 at 13:14




2




2





@JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
Apr 6 at 13:18





@JonasWilms - Yeah, I bookmarked this one on the basis that there isn't a lot of extraneous stuff, it really is just the earlier return thing. :-)

– T.J. Crowder
Apr 6 at 13:18













@T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

– Barmar
Apr 6 at 18:43






@T.J.Crowder stackoverflow.com/questions/42913798/… is the general dupe I wrote for this class of problems.

– Barmar
Apr 6 at 18:43













5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















5














Just place return true out of for loop,



If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




Let's understand by 1st example




  • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

  • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




function checkFactors(factors, num) 

for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
let element = factors[i];
if (num % element !== 0)
return false


return true




console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




  1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

  2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






function checkFactors(factors, num) 
return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








share|improve this answer
































    7














    You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



    Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



    You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



    You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



    Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



    Or in code:



     // ¹
    function checkChocolates(chocolates)
    for(const chocolate of chocolates)
    if(isTasty(chocolate))
    return true;
    else
    return false;




    // ²
    function checkChocolates(chocolates)
    for(const chocolate of chocolates)
    if(isTasty(chocolate))
    continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
    else
    return false;


    return true;



    As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



     if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
    alert("all chocolates are fine");
    else
    alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



    whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




    If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






    share|improve this answer




















    • 1





      A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

      – Wai Ha Lee
      Apr 6 at 13:25






    • 1





      @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

      – Jonas Wilms
      Apr 6 at 13:28


















    1














    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
    let flag = true;
    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
    let element = factors[i];
    if (num % element !== 0)
    flag = false;
    break;


    return flag;


    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








    share|improve this answer
































      0














      Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



      function checkFactors(factors, num) 

      for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
      let element = factors[i];
      console.log(element)

      if (num % element !== 0)
      return false


      return true;






      share|improve this answer


















      • 1





        He is looking for an explanation as well though

        – Icepickle
        Apr 6 at 13:10











      • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

        – javapedia.net
        Apr 6 at 13:12



















      0














      Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






      share|improve this answer








      New contributor




      W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















        Your Answer






        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
        StackExchange.snippets.init();
        );
        );
        , "code-snippets");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "1"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55549338%2ftest-whether-all-array-elements-are-factors-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        5














        Just place return true out of for loop,



        If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




        Let's understand by 1st example




        • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

        • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
        let element = factors[i];
        if (num % element !== 0)
        return false


        return true




        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






        In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




        1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

        2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

        JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






        function checkFactors(factors, num) 
        return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
        console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








        share|improve this answer





























          5














          Just place return true out of for loop,



          If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




          Let's understand by 1st example




          • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

          • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




          function checkFactors(factors, num) 

          for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
          let element = factors[i];
          if (num % element !== 0)
          return false


          return true




          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






          In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




          1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

          2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

          JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






          function checkFactors(factors, num) 
          return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
          console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








          share|improve this answer



























            5












            5








            5







            Just place return true out of for loop,



            If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




            Let's understand by 1st example




            • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

            • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






            In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




            1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

            2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

            JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








            share|improve this answer















            Just place return true out of for loop,



            If you keep return true in else part as soon as any of value which does not satisfies num % element !== 0 your code will return true which should not happen in this case as you're checking for all the values in array should be factor of given number




            Let's understand by 1st example




            • On first element in array 1 it will check if condition num % element !== 0 which turns out false, so it will go to else condition and return true from function and will not check for rest of values.

            • So you need to keep return true at the end so if any of the value in loop doesn't satisfy the if condition than only control will go to return true




            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))






            In short - In such case where you want all of them must match a condition as a thumb rule you can consider it like




            1. keep the failing case return value inside for loop

            2. keep the passing case return value at the end of function

            JS have a inbuilt method Array.every for such cases






            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));








            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 

            for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
            let element = factors[i];
            if (num % element !== 0)
            return false


            return true




            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12)) //➞ false
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2))





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));





            function checkFactors(factors, num) 
            return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
            console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));






            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited Apr 6 at 16:22

























            answered Apr 6 at 13:07









            Code ManiacCode Maniac

            11.8k2834




            11.8k2834























                7














                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  Apr 6 at 13:25






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  Apr 6 at 13:28















                7














                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer




















                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  Apr 6 at 13:25






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  Apr 6 at 13:28













                7












                7








                7







                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)






                share|improve this answer















                You are working in a chocolate store, and your boss tells you to check wether all chocolates (there are chili chocolate, caramel chocolate and coffee chocolate) are delicious. He tells you the following:



                Go through all chocolates, and for each chocolate, taste it, if it is fine, tell me that everything is fine, otherwise tell me that something is wrong¹



                You start with the first chocolate, which is chili chocolate, it tastes delucious, you go to your boss and tell him that everything is fine. Your boss yells at you because you haven't tasted the caramel chocolate and the coffee chocolate yet.



                You realize that your boss actually wanted you to do:



                Go through the chocolates, for each chocolate, taste it, if it doesnt taste well tell, tell me immeadiately, otherwise continue until you tasted them all, then return to me and tell me that everything is fine.²



                Or in code:



                 // ¹
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                return true;
                else
                return false;




                // ²
                function checkChocolates(chocolates)
                for(const chocolate of chocolates)
                if(isTasty(chocolate))
                continue; // this could be omitted, as a loop keeps looping nevertheless
                else
                return false;


                return true;



                As this is a very common task in programming, there is already a shorter way to express this:



                 if(chocolates.every(isTasty)) 
                alert("all chocolates are fine");
                else
                alert("Oh, that doesnt taste good");



                whereas isTasty is a function taking a chocolate and returning either true or false.




                If you didn't grasp it yet, just try it out! Buy some chocolate, and taste it! If someone tells you "eating choclate isn't learning", respond with "I'm doing rubber duck debugging" and no one can complain :)







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited Apr 6 at 13:31

























                answered Apr 6 at 13:10









                Jonas WilmsJonas Wilms

                65.6k53660




                65.6k53660







                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  Apr 6 at 13:25






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  Apr 6 at 13:28












                • 1





                  A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                  – Wai Ha Lee
                  Apr 6 at 13:25






                • 1





                  @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                  – Jonas Wilms
                  Apr 6 at 13:28







                1




                1





                A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                – Wai Ha Lee
                Apr 6 at 13:25





                A tiny quibble - it's "chocolate", not "choclate".

                – Wai Ha Lee
                Apr 6 at 13:25




                1




                1





                @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                – Jonas Wilms
                Apr 6 at 13:28





                @waiHaLee oh, pronounciation tricked me ...

                – Jonas Wilms
                Apr 6 at 13:28











                1














                Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                let flag = true;
                for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                let element = factors[i];
                if (num % element !== 0)
                flag = false;
                break;


                return flag;


                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                share|improve this answer





























                  1














                  Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                  The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                  Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                  function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                  let flag = true;
                  for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                  let element = factors[i];
                  if (num % element !== 0)
                  flag = false;
                  break;


                  return flag;


                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                  console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                  console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                  You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                  function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                  return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                  console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                  console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                  console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                  share|improve this answer



























                    1












                    1








                    1







                    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                    share|improve this answer















                    Inside the loop the input num was was tested for divisibility, if the num was divisible the control was going in the else block from where the function returned true.



                    The loop was not checking for all numbers of the input array it was returning true when the first number was divisible.



                    Just use a flag variable to see if all of the elements are divisible by the input number num, if any one is not divisible the flag will set to false and then we can break out of the loop and return it as there is no point to check the other numbers.






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    You can also use Array.every to check the same in a concise way:






                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));








                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    let flag = true;
                    for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                    let element = factors[i];
                    if (num % element !== 0)
                    flag = false;
                    break;


                    return flag;


                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));





                    function checkFactors(factors, num) 
                    return factors.every(element => num % element === 0);

                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2, 3, 8], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([1, 2], 2));
                    console.log(checkFactors([2, 4, 3, 6, 9], 12));
                    console.log(checkFactors([3, 5, 2, 6, 9], 15));
                    console.log(checkFactors([4, 2, 8, 1], 16));






                    share|improve this answer














                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer








                    edited Apr 6 at 13:29

























                    answered Apr 6 at 13:12









                    Amardeep BhowmickAmardeep Bhowmick

                    5,59821128




                    5,59821128





















                        0














                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          Apr 6 at 13:10











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          Apr 6 at 13:12
















                        0














                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer


















                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          Apr 6 at 13:10











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          Apr 6 at 13:12














                        0












                        0








                        0







                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;






                        share|improve this answer













                        Yes, "else" causing the issue. I removed it and added "return true" outside of for loop.



                        function checkFactors(factors, num) 

                        for (let i=0; i<factors.length; i++)
                        let element = factors[i];
                        console.log(element)

                        if (num % element !== 0)
                        return false


                        return true;







                        share|improve this answer












                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer










                        answered Apr 6 at 13:08









                        javapedia.netjavapedia.net

                        575312




                        575312







                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          Apr 6 at 13:10











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          Apr 6 at 13:12













                        • 1





                          He is looking for an explanation as well though

                          – Icepickle
                          Apr 6 at 13:10











                        • I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                          – javapedia.net
                          Apr 6 at 13:12








                        1




                        1





                        He is looking for an explanation as well though

                        – Icepickle
                        Apr 6 at 13:10





                        He is looking for an explanation as well though

                        – Icepickle
                        Apr 6 at 13:10













                        I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                        – javapedia.net
                        Apr 6 at 13:12






                        I see Icepickle has explained in the question comments nicely! Jonas Wilms's answer too.

                        – javapedia.net
                        Apr 6 at 13:12












                        0














                        Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                        share|improve this answer








                        New contributor




                        W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                        Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                          0














                          Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                          share|improve this answer








                          New contributor




                          W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                          Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                            0












                            0








                            0







                            Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.






                            share|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.










                            Your code's logic is wrong. You should check all the array's Elements, if all elements satisfy the condition, return true, but if one of them not satisfy the condition, return false immediately. The else means one item satisfy the condition, but not all elements. That's where the problem is.







                            share|improve this answer








                            New contributor




                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer






                            New contributor




                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.









                            answered Apr 6 at 13:26









                            W.BrightW.Bright

                            133




                            133




                            New contributor




                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.





                            New contributor





                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.






                            W.Bright is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                            Check out our Code of Conduct.



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55549338%2ftest-whether-all-array-elements-are-factors-of-a-number%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                                대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

                                Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition