Can one file be owned by two RPM packages?List all RPM packages installed from repo “X”install RPM packages using perlRed Hat Enterprise Linux desktop: constant crashing, unusable, what to doInstalling RPM packages with circular dependencyAfter updating the Red Hat server kernel to latest version it still shows as old versionHow to use touch to set modified/created timestamp of a file?How can I install the unity-desktop on Red Hat?`rpm -qa` vs `yum list installed`: Why certain packages can be found with `rpm -qa` only?Weird kernel.shmax valuePersistent module loading not working
What are the ramifications of creating a homebrew world without an Astral Plane?
Trouble understanding overseas colleagues
Was Spock the First Vulcan in Starfleet?
Is there an Impartial Brexit Deal comparison site?
Finding all intervals that match predicate in vector
Is the destination of a commercial flight important for the pilot?
What is difference between behavior and behaviour
Is there any reason not to eat food that's been dropped on the surface of the moon?
Why "be dealt cards" rather than "be dealing cards"?
Transcription Beats per minute
What to do with wrong results in talks?
How can I use the arrow sign in my bash prompt?
Ways to speed up user implemented RK4
Have I saved too much for retirement so far?
Where in the Bible does the greeting ("Dominus Vobiscum") used at Mass come from?
Curses work by shouting - How to avoid collateral damage?
Star/Wye electrical connection math symbol
Mapping a list into a phase plot
Should my PhD thesis be submitted under my legal name?
What's the purpose of "true" in bash "if sudo true; then"
How do I rename a LINUX host without needing to reboot for the rename to take effect?
How does a character multiclassing into warlock get a focus?
There is only s̶i̶x̶t̶y one place he can be
What's a natural way to say that someone works somewhere (for a job)?
Can one file be owned by two RPM packages?
List all RPM packages installed from repo “X”install RPM packages using perlRed Hat Enterprise Linux desktop: constant crashing, unusable, what to doInstalling RPM packages with circular dependencyAfter updating the Red Hat server kernel to latest version it still shows as old versionHow to use touch to set modified/created timestamp of a file?How can I install the unity-desktop on Red Hat?`rpm -qa` vs `yum list installed`: Why certain packages can be found with `rpm -qa` only?Weird kernel.shmax valuePersistent module loading not working
Below commands show that one file is owned by two packages. Is there something wrong or is this an expected/acceptable behaviour with RPM packages?
$rpm -qf /bin/ls
coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-47.el6.x86_64
$ rpm -qa|grep 'coreutils-8'
coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-47.el6.x86_64
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago)
rhel yum rpm
|
show 2 more comments
Below commands show that one file is owned by two packages. Is there something wrong or is this an expected/acceptable behaviour with RPM packages?
$rpm -qf /bin/ls
coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-47.el6.x86_64
$ rpm -qa|grep 'coreutils-8'
coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-47.el6.x86_64
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago)
rhel yum rpm
Found a related article
– penguin
yesterday
I'd nitpick and say that you have two versions of one package installed -- not the potential interpretation of "one file owned by two different packages"
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
Thanks - agreed. So, is that an acceptable/expected practice ?
– penguin
yesterday
1
I'm impressed & confused as to how you managed to come to this state; what do you use to install/manage packages on this system? rpm? yum? Did you do anything recently with the coreutils package?
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
yum. Its an old server. If its not a good thing, I need to dig for more details.
– penguin
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
Below commands show that one file is owned by two packages. Is there something wrong or is this an expected/acceptable behaviour with RPM packages?
$rpm -qf /bin/ls
coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-47.el6.x86_64
$ rpm -qa|grep 'coreutils-8'
coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-47.el6.x86_64
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago)
rhel yum rpm
Below commands show that one file is owned by two packages. Is there something wrong or is this an expected/acceptable behaviour with RPM packages?
$rpm -qf /bin/ls
coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-47.el6.x86_64
$ rpm -qa|grep 'coreutils-8'
coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64
coreutils-8.4-47.el6.x86_64
$ cat /etc/redhat-release
Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 6.10 (Santiago)
rhel yum rpm
rhel yum rpm
asked yesterday
penguinpenguin
1714
1714
Found a related article
– penguin
yesterday
I'd nitpick and say that you have two versions of one package installed -- not the potential interpretation of "one file owned by two different packages"
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
Thanks - agreed. So, is that an acceptable/expected practice ?
– penguin
yesterday
1
I'm impressed & confused as to how you managed to come to this state; what do you use to install/manage packages on this system? rpm? yum? Did you do anything recently with the coreutils package?
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
yum. Its an old server. If its not a good thing, I need to dig for more details.
– penguin
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
Found a related article
– penguin
yesterday
I'd nitpick and say that you have two versions of one package installed -- not the potential interpretation of "one file owned by two different packages"
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
Thanks - agreed. So, is that an acceptable/expected practice ?
– penguin
yesterday
1
I'm impressed & confused as to how you managed to come to this state; what do you use to install/manage packages on this system? rpm? yum? Did you do anything recently with the coreutils package?
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
yum. Its an old server. If its not a good thing, I need to dig for more details.
– penguin
yesterday
Found a related article
– penguin
yesterday
Found a related article
– penguin
yesterday
I'd nitpick and say that you have two versions of one package installed -- not the potential interpretation of "one file owned by two different packages"
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
I'd nitpick and say that you have two versions of one package installed -- not the potential interpretation of "one file owned by two different packages"
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
Thanks - agreed. So, is that an acceptable/expected practice ?
– penguin
yesterday
Thanks - agreed. So, is that an acceptable/expected practice ?
– penguin
yesterday
1
1
I'm impressed & confused as to how you managed to come to this state; what do you use to install/manage packages on this system? rpm? yum? Did you do anything recently with the coreutils package?
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
I'm impressed & confused as to how you managed to come to this state; what do you use to install/manage packages on this system? rpm? yum? Did you do anything recently with the coreutils package?
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
yum. Its an old server. If its not a good thing, I need to dig for more details.
– penguin
yesterday
yum. Its an old server. If its not a good thing, I need to dig for more details.
– penguin
yesterday
|
show 2 more comments
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
- No, a file cannot be owned by two rpm packages
- You have two versions of the same package installed. You need to solve that issue.
Personally I have already encountered this some times when updating some packages and then the server is powered off, so data is incomplete on disk. You can try repairing the rpmdb:
rpm --rebuilddb
If you have two packages installed even after rpm db rebuild , you could try just removing both and then reinstalling the one you want.
1
You can remove just one package when you specify full NEVRA, i.e. "rpm -e coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64" This will remove the old package and keep the new one.
– msuchy
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508490%2fcan-one-file-be-owned-by-two-rpm-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
- No, a file cannot be owned by two rpm packages
- You have two versions of the same package installed. You need to solve that issue.
Personally I have already encountered this some times when updating some packages and then the server is powered off, so data is incomplete on disk. You can try repairing the rpmdb:
rpm --rebuilddb
If you have two packages installed even after rpm db rebuild , you could try just removing both and then reinstalling the one you want.
1
You can remove just one package when you specify full NEVRA, i.e. "rpm -e coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64" This will remove the old package and keep the new one.
– msuchy
15 hours ago
add a comment |
- No, a file cannot be owned by two rpm packages
- You have two versions of the same package installed. You need to solve that issue.
Personally I have already encountered this some times when updating some packages and then the server is powered off, so data is incomplete on disk. You can try repairing the rpmdb:
rpm --rebuilddb
If you have two packages installed even after rpm db rebuild , you could try just removing both and then reinstalling the one you want.
1
You can remove just one package when you specify full NEVRA, i.e. "rpm -e coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64" This will remove the old package and keep the new one.
– msuchy
15 hours ago
add a comment |
- No, a file cannot be owned by two rpm packages
- You have two versions of the same package installed. You need to solve that issue.
Personally I have already encountered this some times when updating some packages and then the server is powered off, so data is incomplete on disk. You can try repairing the rpmdb:
rpm --rebuilddb
If you have two packages installed even after rpm db rebuild , you could try just removing both and then reinstalling the one you want.
- No, a file cannot be owned by two rpm packages
- You have two versions of the same package installed. You need to solve that issue.
Personally I have already encountered this some times when updating some packages and then the server is powered off, so data is incomplete on disk. You can try repairing the rpmdb:
rpm --rebuilddb
If you have two packages installed even after rpm db rebuild , you could try just removing both and then reinstalling the one you want.
edited 22 hours ago
penguin
1714
1714
answered yesterday
Chris MaesChris Maes
1,13911119
1,13911119
1
You can remove just one package when you specify full NEVRA, i.e. "rpm -e coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64" This will remove the old package and keep the new one.
– msuchy
15 hours ago
add a comment |
1
You can remove just one package when you specify full NEVRA, i.e. "rpm -e coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64" This will remove the old package and keep the new one.
– msuchy
15 hours ago
1
1
You can remove just one package when you specify full NEVRA, i.e. "rpm -e coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64" This will remove the old package and keep the new one.
– msuchy
15 hours ago
You can remove just one package when you specify full NEVRA, i.e. "rpm -e coreutils-8.4-46.el6.x86_64" This will remove the old package and keep the new one.
– msuchy
15 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f508490%2fcan-one-file-be-owned-by-two-rpm-packages%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Found a related article
– penguin
yesterday
I'd nitpick and say that you have two versions of one package installed -- not the potential interpretation of "one file owned by two different packages"
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
Thanks - agreed. So, is that an acceptable/expected practice ?
– penguin
yesterday
1
I'm impressed & confused as to how you managed to come to this state; what do you use to install/manage packages on this system? rpm? yum? Did you do anything recently with the coreutils package?
– Jeff Schaller♦
yesterday
yum. Its an old server. If its not a good thing, I need to dig for more details.
– penguin
yesterday