declare as function pointer and initialize in the same line The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What is a smart pointer and when should I use one?Returning unique_ptr from functionsWhy is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Image Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionWhy should I use a pointer rather than the object itself?Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviationsFunction pointer, which can point to every thing?Has a std::byte pointer the same aliasing implications as char*?declare and define function pointer variable in one line
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
Find non-case sensitive string in a mixed list of elements?
Which one is the true statement?
Axiom Schema vs Axiom
Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?
Would a completely good Muggle be able to use a wand?
Bartok - Syncopation (1): Meaning of notes in between Grand Staff
Does soap repel water?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
Are police here, aren't itthey?
Grabbing quick drinks
Method for adding error messages to a dictionary given a key
Is French Guiana a (hard) EU border?
How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?
Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?
I want to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in file contain very large number of lines :
What connection does MS Office have to Netscape Navigator?
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
How to edit “Name” property in GCI output?
0 rank tensor vs 1D vector
Solving system of ODEs with extra parameter
Reference request: Grassmannian and Plucker coordinates in type B, C, D
What did we know about the Kessel run before the prequels?
A small doubt about the dominated convergence theorem
declare as function pointer and initialize in the same line
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhat are the differences between a pointer variable and a reference variable in C++?What is a smart pointer and when should I use one?Returning unique_ptr from functionsWhy is reading lines from stdin much slower in C++ than Python?Image Processing: Algorithm Improvement for 'Coca-Cola Can' RecognitionWhy should I use a pointer rather than the object itself?Replacing a 32-bit loop counter with 64-bit introduces crazy performance deviationsFunction pointer, which can point to every thing?Has a std::byte pointer the same aliasing implications as char*?declare and define function pointer variable in one line
In C++ how do we do the following
// fundamental language construct
type name = value;
// for example
int x = y;
with function pointers?
typedef (char)(*FP)(unsigned);
// AFAIK not possible in C++
FP x = y ;
I can use lambdas
FP x = []( unsigned k) -> char return char(k);
But I do not know how to do this without lambda. Any ideas? This is not an answer. we know this works:
void whatever ()
typedef void (*FP) (void);
FP x = whatever ;
The question is if one can do this in one line in C++. Like one can do it in one line in C++ with every other type kind.
c++
New contributor
add a comment |
In C++ how do we do the following
// fundamental language construct
type name = value;
// for example
int x = y;
with function pointers?
typedef (char)(*FP)(unsigned);
// AFAIK not possible in C++
FP x = y ;
I can use lambdas
FP x = []( unsigned k) -> char return char(k);
But I do not know how to do this without lambda. Any ideas? This is not an answer. we know this works:
void whatever ()
typedef void (*FP) (void);
FP x = whatever ;
The question is if one can do this in one line in C++. Like one can do it in one line in C++ with every other type kind.
c++
New contributor
3
You could always stick withauto x = &the_function;'
.
– François Andrieux
2 days ago
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look liketype name = value;
.
– François Andrieux
2 days ago
You're missing the&
beforewhatever
.FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
2 days ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the(char)
, which should bechar
in yourtypedef
)
– andreee
2 days ago
add a comment |
In C++ how do we do the following
// fundamental language construct
type name = value;
// for example
int x = y;
with function pointers?
typedef (char)(*FP)(unsigned);
// AFAIK not possible in C++
FP x = y ;
I can use lambdas
FP x = []( unsigned k) -> char return char(k);
But I do not know how to do this without lambda. Any ideas? This is not an answer. we know this works:
void whatever ()
typedef void (*FP) (void);
FP x = whatever ;
The question is if one can do this in one line in C++. Like one can do it in one line in C++ with every other type kind.
c++
New contributor
In C++ how do we do the following
// fundamental language construct
type name = value;
// for example
int x = y;
with function pointers?
typedef (char)(*FP)(unsigned);
// AFAIK not possible in C++
FP x = y ;
I can use lambdas
FP x = []( unsigned k) -> char return char(k);
But I do not know how to do this without lambda. Any ideas? This is not an answer. we know this works:
void whatever ()
typedef void (*FP) (void);
FP x = whatever ;
The question is if one can do this in one line in C++. Like one can do it in one line in C++ with every other type kind.
c++
c++
New contributor
New contributor
edited 2 days ago
Guillaume Racicot
15.9k53770
15.9k53770
New contributor
asked 2 days ago
emma brainemma brain
1083
1083
New contributor
New contributor
3
You could always stick withauto x = &the_function;'
.
– François Andrieux
2 days ago
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look liketype name = value;
.
– François Andrieux
2 days ago
You're missing the&
beforewhatever
.FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
2 days ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the(char)
, which should bechar
in yourtypedef
)
– andreee
2 days ago
add a comment |
3
You could always stick withauto x = &the_function;'
.
– François Andrieux
2 days ago
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look liketype name = value;
.
– François Andrieux
2 days ago
You're missing the&
beforewhatever
.FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
2 days ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the(char)
, which should bechar
in yourtypedef
)
– andreee
2 days ago
3
3
You could always stick with
auto x = &the_function;'
.– François Andrieux
2 days ago
You could always stick with
auto x = &the_function;'
.– François Andrieux
2 days ago
1
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look like
type name = value;
.– François Andrieux
2 days ago
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look like
type name = value;
.– François Andrieux
2 days ago
You're missing the
&
before whatever
. FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
2 days ago
You're missing the
&
before whatever
. FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
2 days ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the
(char)
, which should be char
in your typedef
)– andreee
2 days ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the
(char)
, which should be char
in your typedef
)– andreee
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 days ago
add a comment |
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
I like this answer a bit more than the accepted one. It is more C++11-ish even though it is not clear that OP has or wants a C++11 solution. But hey, C++11 is not the "all new exotic" standard any more.
– TobiMcNamobi
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function ()
StackExchange.using("snippets", function ()
StackExchange.snippets.init();
);
);
, "code-snippets");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "1"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55400483%2fdeclare-as-function-pointer-and-initialize-in-the-same-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 days ago
add a comment |
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 days ago
add a comment |
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
Whenever you can write a typedef, you can also write a variable declaration with no typedef, with almost identical syntax.
Example:
// typedef
typedef char(*FP)(unsigned);
FP x = y ;
// no typedef
char(*x)(unsigned) = y;
Remove the typedef
keyword, and you have a variable declaration. Slap an initialisation on it if you want.
answered 2 days ago
n.m.n.m.
73.7k885172
73.7k885172
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 days ago
add a comment |
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.
– cmaster
2 days ago
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:
char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.– cmaster
2 days ago
Works just as well as in C, and can also be used for array types:
char (*img)[width][3] = malloc(height*sizeof(*img));
While this syntax is pretty useless in C++ (no array types with runtime sizes), it works well in C and sports the same counterintuitive syntax.– cmaster
2 days ago
add a comment |
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
I like this answer a bit more than the accepted one. It is more C++11-ish even though it is not clear that OP has or wants a C++11 solution. But hey, C++11 is not the "all new exotic" standard any more.
– TobiMcNamobi
yesterday
add a comment |
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
I like this answer a bit more than the accepted one. It is more C++11-ish even though it is not clear that OP has or wants a C++11 solution. But hey, C++11 is not the "all new exotic" standard any more.
– TobiMcNamobi
yesterday
add a comment |
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
You can use auto
:
auto fptr = &f;
It skips the need of a typedef and conserve a nice syntax.
answered 2 days ago
Guillaume RacicotGuillaume Racicot
15.9k53770
15.9k53770
I like this answer a bit more than the accepted one. It is more C++11-ish even though it is not clear that OP has or wants a C++11 solution. But hey, C++11 is not the "all new exotic" standard any more.
– TobiMcNamobi
yesterday
add a comment |
I like this answer a bit more than the accepted one. It is more C++11-ish even though it is not clear that OP has or wants a C++11 solution. But hey, C++11 is not the "all new exotic" standard any more.
– TobiMcNamobi
yesterday
I like this answer a bit more than the accepted one. It is more C++11-ish even though it is not clear that OP has or wants a C++11 solution. But hey, C++11 is not the "all new exotic" standard any more.
– TobiMcNamobi
yesterday
I like this answer a bit more than the accepted one. It is more C++11-ish even though it is not clear that OP has or wants a C++11 solution. But hey, C++11 is not the "all new exotic" standard any more.
– TobiMcNamobi
yesterday
add a comment |
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
emma brain is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Stack Overflow!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fstackoverflow.com%2fquestions%2f55400483%2fdeclare-as-function-pointer-and-initialize-in-the-same-line%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
3
You could always stick with
auto x = &the_function;'
.– François Andrieux
2 days ago
1
The name of a function pointer variable appears between the return type and the arguments It won't look like
type name = value;
.– François Andrieux
2 days ago
You're missing the
&
beforewhatever
.FP x = &whatever ;
– dave
2 days ago
@dave: That's the same for functions, you don't need the ampersand. @emma: Why should that not be possible in C++? This should work fine (except for the
(char)
, which should bechar
in yourtypedef
)– andreee
2 days ago