Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy did Khan keep Ceti eels?Why does Carol Marcus not recognize Khan in The Wrath of Khan?Why did Khan decide to chase the Enterprise into the Mutara Nebula in Star Trek II?What is the light source in the Genesis cave?Who did Khan get his Starfleet insignia from?Were the Project Genesis Summary animations computer generated?What does this blurry technobabble on the Project Genesis Summary splash screen say?In Star Trek 2 (movie) The Wrath Of Khan, why does Khan wear the federation emblem?Why didn't Khan beam Kirk up from the planet when he beamed up the Genesis Device?Why does Khan have two copies of “Paradise Lost”?
Why do airplanes bank sharply to the right after air-to-air refueling?
Why did CATV standarize in 75 ohms and everyone else in 50?
The past simple of "gaslight" – "gaslighted" or "gaslit"?
Is the D&D universe the same as the Forgotten Realms universe?
Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin
If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?
Grabbing quick drinks
Is there always a complete, orthogonal set of unitary matrices?
Why is the US ranked as #45 in Press Freedom ratings, despite its extremely permissive free speech laws?
When you upcast Blindness/Deafness, do all targets suffer the same effect?
A small doubt about the dominated convergence theorem
Is it professional to write unrelated content in an almost-empty email?
Why do remote US companies require working in the US?
What does "Its cash flow is deeply negative" mean?
How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?
Math-accent symbol over parentheses enclosing accented symbol (amsmath)
Does increasing your ability score affect your main stat?
INSERT to a table from a database to other (same SQL Server) using Dynamic SQL
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
How many extra stops do monopods offer for tele photographs?
TikZ: How to reverse arrow direction without switching start/end point?
RigExpert AA-35 - Interpreting The Information
Method for adding error messages to a dictionary given a key
Calculator final project in Python
Why didn't Khan get resurrected in the Genesis Explosion?
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWhy did Khan keep Ceti eels?Why does Carol Marcus not recognize Khan in The Wrath of Khan?Why did Khan decide to chase the Enterprise into the Mutara Nebula in Star Trek II?What is the light source in the Genesis cave?Who did Khan get his Starfleet insignia from?Were the Project Genesis Summary animations computer generated?What does this blurry technobabble on the Project Genesis Summary splash screen say?In Star Trek 2 (movie) The Wrath Of Khan, why does Khan wear the federation emblem?Why didn't Khan beam Kirk up from the planet when he beamed up the Genesis Device?Why does Khan have two copies of “Paradise Lost”?
In the end of (1980s) Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, as the Enterprise escapes the nebula, leaving the dying Reliant behind, we see Khan engaging the memory banks of the Genesis device.
Later we see Spock's coffin torpedo ends up on the newly formed Genesis planet and as part of the result of the Genesis effect, clearly gets resurrected.
Wouldn't Khan have been resurrected too? Although, yes, Reliant was destroyed by the Genesis wave explosion, shouldn't he (and his crew??) have been resurrected as a by-product of the Genesis effect as well?
star-trek the-wrath-of-khan
edited 2 days ago
Null♦
54.4k18229312
asked 2 days ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
536112
add a comment |
In the end of (1980s) Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, as the Enterprise escapes the nebula, leaving the dying Reliant behind, we see Khan engaging the memory banks of the Genesis device.
Later we see Spock's coffin torpedo ends up on the newly formed Genesis planet and as part of the result of the Genesis effect, clearly gets resurrected.
Wouldn't Khan have been resurrected too? Although, yes, Reliant was destroyed by the Genesis wave explosion, shouldn't he (and his crew??) have been resurrected as a by-product of the Genesis effect as well?
star-trek the-wrath-of-khan
edited 2 days ago
Null♦
54.4k18229312
asked 2 days ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
536112
6
Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
3
Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.
– Gaultheria
2 days ago
@Gaultheria Maybe Kruge was swallowed up by Khan, who had become a lava-spewing Balrog like being at the core of the Genesis planet.
– Deepak
yesterday
add a comment |
In the end of (1980s) Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, as the Enterprise escapes the nebula, leaving the dying Reliant behind, we see Khan engaging the memory banks of the Genesis device.
Later we see Spock's coffin torpedo ends up on the newly formed Genesis planet and as part of the result of the Genesis effect, clearly gets resurrected.
Wouldn't Khan have been resurrected too? Although, yes, Reliant was destroyed by the Genesis wave explosion, shouldn't he (and his crew??) have been resurrected as a by-product of the Genesis effect as well?
star-trek the-wrath-of-khan
edited 2 days ago
Null♦
54.4k18229312
asked 2 days ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
536112
In the end of (1980s) Star Trek II: Wrath of Khan, as the Enterprise escapes the nebula, leaving the dying Reliant behind, we see Khan engaging the memory banks of the Genesis device.
Later we see Spock's coffin torpedo ends up on the newly formed Genesis planet and as part of the result of the Genesis effect, clearly gets resurrected.
Wouldn't Khan have been resurrected too? Although, yes, Reliant was destroyed by the Genesis wave explosion, shouldn't he (and his crew??) have been resurrected as a by-product of the Genesis effect as well?
star-trek the-wrath-of-khan
star-trek the-wrath-of-khan
edited 2 days ago
Null♦
54.4k18229312
asked 2 days ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
536112
edited 2 days ago
Null♦
54.4k18229312
asked 2 days ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
536112
edited 2 days ago
Null♦
54.4k18229312
edited 2 days ago
Null♦
54.4k18229312
edited 2 days ago
Null♦
54.4k18229312
54.4k18229312
asked 2 days ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
536112
asked 2 days ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
536112
asked 2 days ago
MissouriSpartanMissouriSpartan
536112
536112
6
Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
3
Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.
– Gaultheria
2 days ago
@Gaultheria Maybe Kruge was swallowed up by Khan, who had become a lava-spewing Balrog like being at the core of the Genesis planet.
– Deepak
yesterday
add a comment |
6
Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
3
Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.
– Gaultheria
2 days ago
@Gaultheria Maybe Kruge was swallowed up by Khan, who had become a lava-spewing Balrog like being at the core of the Genesis planet.
– Deepak
yesterday
6
6
Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
3
3
Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.
– Gaultheria
2 days ago
Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.
– Gaultheria
2 days ago
@Gaultheria Maybe Kruge was swallowed up by Khan, who had become a lava-spewing Balrog like being at the core of the Genesis planet.
– Deepak
yesterday
@Gaultheria Maybe Kruge was swallowed up by Khan, who had become a lava-spewing Balrog like being at the core of the Genesis planet.
– Deepak
yesterday
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
As observed in this dialogue from the movie:
McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?
Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.
Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.
edited 2 days ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23148309
answered 2 days ago
BlazeBlaze
1,778717
3
it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....
– King of NES
2 days ago
It also may be connected to the instability of using protomatter, which seems to have made things work as intended.
– trlkly
yesterday
add a comment |
The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.
Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.
From The Wrath of Khan (emphasis added):
KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.
It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.
From The Search for Spock:
SAAVIK: Metallic mass.
DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!
ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'
In short, Spock is the only person to be restored in any way by the Genesis Device. Spock had no interaction with the detonation itself, only the after-effects of the formed matrix. Spock's interactions have nothing in common with Khan's interactions with the wave (being at ground zero). There's no reason to believe entirely different interactions should have remotely similar results.
answered 2 days ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
4,11131843
4
If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
6
@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
As I recall, possibly from a novelization of the movie, Spock was reborn and aged rapidly to adulthood (like the plants and trees on the planet). I'm searching for evidence...
– Arluin
yesterday
add a comment |
The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down. According to an article from Starlog magazine in 1992, Montalban believed that bringing Khan back would cheapen his death.
Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.
answered 2 days ago
DavislorDavislor
1,56028
2
Do you have a source for that?
– Joe
2 days ago
1
I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.
– Davislor
2 days ago
1
@Joe The article appeared in Starlog in 1992. “Ship in a Bottle” was apparently unrelated to that pitch.
– Davislor
2 days ago
add a comment |
Unless Khan transferred his katra beforehand to a survivor, as Spock did (and then had it restored to him), it seems irrelevant. If a new lifeform based on Khan's DNA arose from Genesis, it would be empty, and not really Khan and there's no reason to believe it would grow into Khan.
answered 22 hours ago
RobRob
211
New contributor
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Spock was not resurrected. A new life form based on his DNA was generated. The lifeforms on the Genesis planet grew at an accelerated rate.
From transcript:
DAVID: There are your lifeforms. These were microbes on the tube's surface. We shot them here from Enterprise. ...They were fruitful, and multiplied.
SAAVIK: But how could they have evolved so quickly?
DAVID: Saavik. ...What is it?
SAAVIK: Spock's burial robe.
(there is an earth tremor and a piercing cry)
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
(Saavik and David find a young Vulcan)
SAAVIK: (in Vulcan) I am Saavik. ...Can you speak?
DAVID The Genesis Wave. His cells could have been regenerated.
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
SAAVIK: We have found the life sign. It is a Vulcan child, perhaps eight to ten Earth years of age.
answered yesterday
ArluinArluin
1846
add a comment |
Perhaps he was. We don't know. We do know that the imediate effect was an explosion large enough to provide for a "cool ships warp away from explosions" moment, centred on the position of the Reliant.
The subsequent effect was to coalesce the mutara nebula into a star and at least one rocky planetoid. It's not at all clear how the positions of those celestial bodies relate to the position of the Reliant at detonation. It seems like a reasonable guess that the star forms at the centre of mass of the nebula, and we know the planet is habitable so it has to form in the star's "goldilocks" zone. Exactly where that is will depend on how much mass is available in the nebula, all of which is spectacularly unlikely to put it anywhere near Reliant.
So a hypothetical resurected Khan is now a baby, without a space suit, floating randomly in space in the vague vacinity of a newly formed planet.
It's going to take more than a genetically engineered intelect to survive that one, resurected Khan dies again almost instantly.
edited 1 hour ago
Ham Sandwich
6,05122575
answered yesterday
Joseph RogersJoseph Rogers
1193
New contributor
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This seems like mostly speculation about some situation that you have no evidence of after your main answer of "we don't know". It might be better to instead focus this on the "we don't know" aspect and back it up with evidence for why we don't know.
– TheLethalCarrot
yesterday
valid criticism, thanks, I might have a bash at that later. I just found the "what if Kahn was resurected" line of reasoning to be an interesting thought experiment.
– Joseph Rogers
yesterday
2
@TheLethalCarrot I think "we don't know" is perfectly valid in this case. It would be perfectly reasonable for a later series to do precisely that : resurrect him as a result of the "genesis effect". As it stands it's an open question whether Khan's character would ever be resurrected in this way and there is no evidence to contradict this as possible. Asking for evidence to prove we don't know is absurd - the reason we don't know is because there's a lack of evidence to the contrary. There's no evidence possible to quote.
– StephenG
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "186"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208067%2fwhy-didnt-khan-get-resurrected-in-the-genesis-explosion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
As observed in this dialogue from the movie:
McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?
Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.
Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.
edited 2 days ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23148309
answered 2 days ago
BlazeBlaze
1,778717
3
it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....
– King of NES
2 days ago
It also may be connected to the instability of using protomatter, which seems to have made things work as intended.
– trlkly
yesterday
add a comment |
As observed in this dialogue from the movie:
McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?
Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.
Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.
edited 2 days ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23148309
answered 2 days ago
BlazeBlaze
1,778717
3
it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....
– King of NES
2 days ago
It also may be connected to the instability of using protomatter, which seems to have made things work as intended.
– trlkly
yesterday
add a comment |
As observed in this dialogue from the movie:
McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?
Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.
Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.
edited 2 days ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23148309
answered 2 days ago
BlazeBlaze
1,778717
As observed in this dialogue from the movie:
McCoy: Dear Lord. You think we're intelligent enough to... suppose... what if this thing were used where life already exists?
Spock: It would destroy such life in favor of its new matrix.
Khan and his gang were literally at ground zero supplying the detonating Genesis Device with raw material. Spock came in much later, comparatively, to be exposed to a slow "simmer" of the cooling Genesis Effect.
edited 2 days ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23148309
answered 2 days ago
BlazeBlaze
1,778717
edited 2 days ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23148309
edited 2 days ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23148309
edited 2 days ago
Thunderforge
31.4k23148309
31.4k23148309
answered 2 days ago
BlazeBlaze
1,778717
answered 2 days ago
BlazeBlaze
1,778717
answered 2 days ago
BlazeBlaze
1,778717
1,778717
3
it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....
– King of NES
2 days ago
It also may be connected to the instability of using protomatter, which seems to have made things work as intended.
– trlkly
yesterday
add a comment |
3
it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....
– King of NES
2 days ago
It also may be connected to the instability of using protomatter, which seems to have made things work as intended.
– trlkly
yesterday
3
3
it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....
– King of NES
2 days ago
it might have khan dna in the future of the creation of that planet tho....
– King of NES
2 days ago
It also may be connected to the instability of using protomatter, which seems to have made things work as intended.
– trlkly
yesterday
It also may be connected to the instability of using protomatter, which seems to have made things work as intended.
– trlkly
yesterday
add a comment |
The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.
Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.
From The Wrath of Khan (emphasis added):
KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.
It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.
From The Search for Spock:
SAAVIK: Metallic mass.
DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!
ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'
In short, Spock is the only person to be restored in any way by the Genesis Device. Spock had no interaction with the detonation itself, only the after-effects of the formed matrix. Spock's interactions have nothing in common with Khan's interactions with the wave (being at ground zero). There's no reason to believe entirely different interactions should have remotely similar results.
answered 2 days ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
4,11131843
4
If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
6
@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
As I recall, possibly from a novelization of the movie, Spock was reborn and aged rapidly to adulthood (like the plants and trees on the planet). I'm searching for evidence...
– Arluin
yesterday
add a comment |
The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.
Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.
From The Wrath of Khan (emphasis added):
KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.
It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.
From The Search for Spock:
SAAVIK: Metallic mass.
DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!
ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'
In short, Spock is the only person to be restored in any way by the Genesis Device. Spock had no interaction with the detonation itself, only the after-effects of the formed matrix. Spock's interactions have nothing in common with Khan's interactions with the wave (being at ground zero). There's no reason to believe entirely different interactions should have remotely similar results.
answered 2 days ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
4,11131843
4
If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
6
@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
As I recall, possibly from a novelization of the movie, Spock was reborn and aged rapidly to adulthood (like the plants and trees on the planet). I'm searching for evidence...
– Arluin
yesterday
add a comment |
The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.
Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.
From The Wrath of Khan (emphasis added):
KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.
It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.
From The Search for Spock:
SAAVIK: Metallic mass.
DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!
ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'
In short, Spock is the only person to be restored in any way by the Genesis Device. Spock had no interaction with the detonation itself, only the after-effects of the formed matrix. Spock's interactions have nothing in common with Khan's interactions with the wave (being at ground zero). There's no reason to believe entirely different interactions should have remotely similar results.
answered 2 days ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
4,11131843
The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody.
Spock was very definitely dead when he was put into the torpedo. His death in the engine room was caused by his efforts to make sure the Enterprise escaped the Genesis Wave. His funeral and "burial at sea" was after the sun and planet had formed.
From The Wrath of Khan (emphasis added):
KIRK: We are assembled here today to pay final respects to our honoured dead. And yet it should be noted that in the midst of our sorrow, this death takes place in the shadow of new life, the sunrise of a new world, a world that our beloved comrade gave his life to protect and nourish. He did not feel that sacrifice a vain or empty one... and we will not debate his profound wisdom at these proceedings. Of my friend, I can only say this. Of all the souls I have encountered in my travels, ...his was the most ...human.
It's uncertain if the Enterprise was was aiming to put it in orbit of the planet, have it incinerate in the atmosphere, or launch it into the star. The survey crew from the Grissom was clearly surprised to find it intact on the surface.
From The Search for Spock:
SAAVIK: Metallic mass.
DAVID: Close-range scan. ...A photon tube! ...Gravitational fields were in flux. ...It must have soft-landed!
ESTEBAN: In code to Starfleet. 'Captain's Spock's tube located on Genesis surface.'
In short, Spock is the only person to be restored in any way by the Genesis Device. Spock had no interaction with the detonation itself, only the after-effects of the formed matrix. Spock's interactions have nothing in common with Khan's interactions with the wave (being at ground zero). There's no reason to believe entirely different interactions should have remotely similar results.
answered 2 days ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
4,11131843
edited yesterday
answered 2 days ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
4,11131843
answered 2 days ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
4,11131843
answered 2 days ago
T.J.L.T.J.L.
4,11131843
4,11131843
4
If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
6
@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
As I recall, possibly from a novelization of the movie, Spock was reborn and aged rapidly to adulthood (like the plants and trees on the planet). I'm searching for evidence...
– Arluin
yesterday
add a comment |
4
If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
6
@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
As I recall, possibly from a novelization of the movie, Spock was reborn and aged rapidly to adulthood (like the plants and trees on the planet). I'm searching for evidence...
– Arluin
yesterday
4
4
If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
If the Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect anybody, then what resurrected Spock?
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer That's beyond the scope of this question. It'd make a good separate question.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
6
6
@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@T.J.L.then perhaps it might be germane to constrain the big bold part of the answer to "The Genesis Device detonation didn't resurrect Khan" since that's what the question asked.
– Jesse C. Slicer
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
@JesseC.Slicer The only other person resurrected was Spock. The body of the text serves to point towards how he was resurrected, as evidence that Kahn didn't experience the same conditions.
– T.J.L.
2 days ago
As I recall, possibly from a novelization of the movie, Spock was reborn and aged rapidly to adulthood (like the plants and trees on the planet). I'm searching for evidence...
– Arluin
yesterday
As I recall, possibly from a novelization of the movie, Spock was reborn and aged rapidly to adulthood (like the plants and trees on the planet). I'm searching for evidence...
– Arluin
yesterday
add a comment |
The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down. According to an article from Starlog magazine in 1992, Montalban believed that bringing Khan back would cheapen his death.
Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.
answered 2 days ago
DavislorDavislor
1,56028
2
Do you have a source for that?
– Joe
2 days ago
1
I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.
– Davislor
2 days ago
1
@Joe The article appeared in Starlog in 1992. “Ship in a Bottle” was apparently unrelated to that pitch.
– Davislor
2 days ago
add a comment |
The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down. According to an article from Starlog magazine in 1992, Montalban believed that bringing Khan back would cheapen his death.
Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.
answered 2 days ago
DavislorDavislor
1,56028
2
Do you have a source for that?
– Joe
2 days ago
1
I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.
– Davislor
2 days ago
1
@Joe The article appeared in Starlog in 1992. “Ship in a Bottle” was apparently unrelated to that pitch.
– Davislor
2 days ago
add a comment |
The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down. According to an article from Starlog magazine in 1992, Montalban believed that bringing Khan back would cheapen his death.
Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.
answered 2 days ago
DavislorDavislor
1,56028
The out-of-universe reason is that Ricardo Montalban was offered the chance to reprise his role (including in a guest appearance in TNG that would have been revealed as a holodeck episode) and turned it down. According to an article from Starlog magazine in 1992, Montalban believed that bringing Khan back would cheapen his death.
Due to worsening injuries from a riding accident in 1951, he could only walk with great difficulty (as you can see at 0:13 of this ad from 1983) and, by the mid-1990s, was confined to a wheelchair.
answered 2 days ago
DavislorDavislor
1,56028
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
DavislorDavislor
1,56028
answered 2 days ago
DavislorDavislor
1,56028
answered 2 days ago
DavislorDavislor
1,56028
1,56028
2
Do you have a source for that?
– Joe
2 days ago
1
I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.
– Davislor
2 days ago
1
@Joe The article appeared in Starlog in 1992. “Ship in a Bottle” was apparently unrelated to that pitch.
– Davislor
2 days ago
add a comment |
2
Do you have a source for that?
– Joe
2 days ago
1
I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.
– Davislor
2 days ago
1
@Joe The article appeared in Starlog in 1992. “Ship in a Bottle” was apparently unrelated to that pitch.
– Davislor
2 days ago
2
2
Do you have a source for that?
– Joe
2 days ago
Do you have a source for that?
– Joe
2 days ago
1
1
I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.
– Davislor
2 days ago
I originally read it in a magazine article years ago by someone who wrote the episode and was told it that was the reason it was rejected. The plotline reminded me of “Ship in a Bottle,” but I could not tell you which came first and whether both writers came up with a similar concept independently.
– Davislor
2 days ago
1
1
@Joe The article appeared in Starlog in 1992. “Ship in a Bottle” was apparently unrelated to that pitch.
– Davislor
2 days ago
@Joe The article appeared in Starlog in 1992. “Ship in a Bottle” was apparently unrelated to that pitch.
– Davislor
2 days ago
add a comment |
Unless Khan transferred his katra beforehand to a survivor, as Spock did (and then had it restored to him), it seems irrelevant. If a new lifeform based on Khan's DNA arose from Genesis, it would be empty, and not really Khan and there's no reason to believe it would grow into Khan.
answered 22 hours ago
RobRob
211
New contributor
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Unless Khan transferred his katra beforehand to a survivor, as Spock did (and then had it restored to him), it seems irrelevant. If a new lifeform based on Khan's DNA arose from Genesis, it would be empty, and not really Khan and there's no reason to believe it would grow into Khan.
answered 22 hours ago
RobRob
211
New contributor
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Unless Khan transferred his katra beforehand to a survivor, as Spock did (and then had it restored to him), it seems irrelevant. If a new lifeform based on Khan's DNA arose from Genesis, it would be empty, and not really Khan and there's no reason to believe it would grow into Khan.
answered 22 hours ago
RobRob
211
New contributor
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Unless Khan transferred his katra beforehand to a survivor, as Spock did (and then had it restored to him), it seems irrelevant. If a new lifeform based on Khan's DNA arose from Genesis, it would be empty, and not really Khan and there's no reason to believe it would grow into Khan.
answered 22 hours ago
RobRob
211
New contributor
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 22 hours ago
RobRob
211
New contributor
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 22 hours ago
RobRob
211
answered 22 hours ago
RobRob
211
211
New contributor
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Rob is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Spock was not resurrected. A new life form based on his DNA was generated. The lifeforms on the Genesis planet grew at an accelerated rate.
From transcript:
DAVID: There are your lifeforms. These were microbes on the tube's surface. We shot them here from Enterprise. ...They were fruitful, and multiplied.
SAAVIK: But how could they have evolved so quickly?
DAVID: Saavik. ...What is it?
SAAVIK: Spock's burial robe.
(there is an earth tremor and a piercing cry)
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
(Saavik and David find a young Vulcan)
SAAVIK: (in Vulcan) I am Saavik. ...Can you speak?
DAVID The Genesis Wave. His cells could have been regenerated.
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
SAAVIK: We have found the life sign. It is a Vulcan child, perhaps eight to ten Earth years of age.
answered yesterday
ArluinArluin
1846
add a comment |
Spock was not resurrected. A new life form based on his DNA was generated. The lifeforms on the Genesis planet grew at an accelerated rate.
From transcript:
DAVID: There are your lifeforms. These were microbes on the tube's surface. We shot them here from Enterprise. ...They were fruitful, and multiplied.
SAAVIK: But how could they have evolved so quickly?
DAVID: Saavik. ...What is it?
SAAVIK: Spock's burial robe.
(there is an earth tremor and a piercing cry)
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
(Saavik and David find a young Vulcan)
SAAVIK: (in Vulcan) I am Saavik. ...Can you speak?
DAVID The Genesis Wave. His cells could have been regenerated.
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
SAAVIK: We have found the life sign. It is a Vulcan child, perhaps eight to ten Earth years of age.
answered yesterday
ArluinArluin
1846
add a comment |
Spock was not resurrected. A new life form based on his DNA was generated. The lifeforms on the Genesis planet grew at an accelerated rate.
From transcript:
DAVID: There are your lifeforms. These were microbes on the tube's surface. We shot them here from Enterprise. ...They were fruitful, and multiplied.
SAAVIK: But how could they have evolved so quickly?
DAVID: Saavik. ...What is it?
SAAVIK: Spock's burial robe.
(there is an earth tremor and a piercing cry)
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
(Saavik and David find a young Vulcan)
SAAVIK: (in Vulcan) I am Saavik. ...Can you speak?
DAVID The Genesis Wave. His cells could have been regenerated.
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
SAAVIK: We have found the life sign. It is a Vulcan child, perhaps eight to ten Earth years of age.
answered yesterday
ArluinArluin
1846
Spock was not resurrected. A new life form based on his DNA was generated. The lifeforms on the Genesis planet grew at an accelerated rate.
From transcript:
DAVID: There are your lifeforms. These were microbes on the tube's surface. We shot them here from Enterprise. ...They were fruitful, and multiplied.
SAAVIK: But how could they have evolved so quickly?
DAVID: Saavik. ...What is it?
SAAVIK: Spock's burial robe.
(there is an earth tremor and a piercing cry)
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
(Saavik and David find a young Vulcan)
SAAVIK: (in Vulcan) I am Saavik. ...Can you speak?
DAVID The Genesis Wave. His cells could have been regenerated.
[Genesis planet surface - arctic]
SAAVIK: We have found the life sign. It is a Vulcan child, perhaps eight to ten Earth years of age.
answered yesterday
ArluinArluin
1846
answered yesterday
ArluinArluin
1846
answered yesterday
ArluinArluin
1846
answered yesterday
ArluinArluin
1846
1846
add a comment |
add a comment |
Perhaps he was. We don't know. We do know that the imediate effect was an explosion large enough to provide for a "cool ships warp away from explosions" moment, centred on the position of the Reliant.
The subsequent effect was to coalesce the mutara nebula into a star and at least one rocky planetoid. It's not at all clear how the positions of those celestial bodies relate to the position of the Reliant at detonation. It seems like a reasonable guess that the star forms at the centre of mass of the nebula, and we know the planet is habitable so it has to form in the star's "goldilocks" zone. Exactly where that is will depend on how much mass is available in the nebula, all of which is spectacularly unlikely to put it anywhere near Reliant.
So a hypothetical resurected Khan is now a baby, without a space suit, floating randomly in space in the vague vacinity of a newly formed planet.
It's going to take more than a genetically engineered intelect to survive that one, resurected Khan dies again almost instantly.
edited 1 hour ago
Ham Sandwich
6,05122575
answered yesterday
Joseph RogersJoseph Rogers
1193
New contributor
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This seems like mostly speculation about some situation that you have no evidence of after your main answer of "we don't know". It might be better to instead focus this on the "we don't know" aspect and back it up with evidence for why we don't know.
– TheLethalCarrot
yesterday
valid criticism, thanks, I might have a bash at that later. I just found the "what if Kahn was resurected" line of reasoning to be an interesting thought experiment.
– Joseph Rogers
yesterday
2
@TheLethalCarrot I think "we don't know" is perfectly valid in this case. It would be perfectly reasonable for a later series to do precisely that : resurrect him as a result of the "genesis effect". As it stands it's an open question whether Khan's character would ever be resurrected in this way and there is no evidence to contradict this as possible. Asking for evidence to prove we don't know is absurd - the reason we don't know is because there's a lack of evidence to the contrary. There's no evidence possible to quote.
– StephenG
yesterday
add a comment |
Perhaps he was. We don't know. We do know that the imediate effect was an explosion large enough to provide for a "cool ships warp away from explosions" moment, centred on the position of the Reliant.
The subsequent effect was to coalesce the mutara nebula into a star and at least one rocky planetoid. It's not at all clear how the positions of those celestial bodies relate to the position of the Reliant at detonation. It seems like a reasonable guess that the star forms at the centre of mass of the nebula, and we know the planet is habitable so it has to form in the star's "goldilocks" zone. Exactly where that is will depend on how much mass is available in the nebula, all of which is spectacularly unlikely to put it anywhere near Reliant.
So a hypothetical resurected Khan is now a baby, without a space suit, floating randomly in space in the vague vacinity of a newly formed planet.
It's going to take more than a genetically engineered intelect to survive that one, resurected Khan dies again almost instantly.
edited 1 hour ago
Ham Sandwich
6,05122575
answered yesterday
Joseph RogersJoseph Rogers
1193
New contributor
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This seems like mostly speculation about some situation that you have no evidence of after your main answer of "we don't know". It might be better to instead focus this on the "we don't know" aspect and back it up with evidence for why we don't know.
– TheLethalCarrot
yesterday
valid criticism, thanks, I might have a bash at that later. I just found the "what if Kahn was resurected" line of reasoning to be an interesting thought experiment.
– Joseph Rogers
yesterday
2
@TheLethalCarrot I think "we don't know" is perfectly valid in this case. It would be perfectly reasonable for a later series to do precisely that : resurrect him as a result of the "genesis effect". As it stands it's an open question whether Khan's character would ever be resurrected in this way and there is no evidence to contradict this as possible. Asking for evidence to prove we don't know is absurd - the reason we don't know is because there's a lack of evidence to the contrary. There's no evidence possible to quote.
– StephenG
yesterday
add a comment |
Perhaps he was. We don't know. We do know that the imediate effect was an explosion large enough to provide for a "cool ships warp away from explosions" moment, centred on the position of the Reliant.
The subsequent effect was to coalesce the mutara nebula into a star and at least one rocky planetoid. It's not at all clear how the positions of those celestial bodies relate to the position of the Reliant at detonation. It seems like a reasonable guess that the star forms at the centre of mass of the nebula, and we know the planet is habitable so it has to form in the star's "goldilocks" zone. Exactly where that is will depend on how much mass is available in the nebula, all of which is spectacularly unlikely to put it anywhere near Reliant.
So a hypothetical resurected Khan is now a baby, without a space suit, floating randomly in space in the vague vacinity of a newly formed planet.
It's going to take more than a genetically engineered intelect to survive that one, resurected Khan dies again almost instantly.
edited 1 hour ago
Ham Sandwich
6,05122575
answered yesterday
Joseph RogersJoseph Rogers
1193
New contributor
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Perhaps he was. We don't know. We do know that the imediate effect was an explosion large enough to provide for a "cool ships warp away from explosions" moment, centred on the position of the Reliant.
The subsequent effect was to coalesce the mutara nebula into a star and at least one rocky planetoid. It's not at all clear how the positions of those celestial bodies relate to the position of the Reliant at detonation. It seems like a reasonable guess that the star forms at the centre of mass of the nebula, and we know the planet is habitable so it has to form in the star's "goldilocks" zone. Exactly where that is will depend on how much mass is available in the nebula, all of which is spectacularly unlikely to put it anywhere near Reliant.
So a hypothetical resurected Khan is now a baby, without a space suit, floating randomly in space in the vague vacinity of a newly formed planet.
It's going to take more than a genetically engineered intelect to survive that one, resurected Khan dies again almost instantly.
edited 1 hour ago
Ham Sandwich
6,05122575
answered yesterday
Joseph RogersJoseph Rogers
1193
New contributor
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 1 hour ago
Ham Sandwich
6,05122575
edited 1 hour ago
Ham Sandwich
6,05122575
edited 1 hour ago
Ham Sandwich
6,05122575
6,05122575
answered yesterday
Joseph RogersJoseph Rogers
1193
New contributor
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
Joseph RogersJoseph Rogers
1193
answered yesterday
Joseph RogersJoseph Rogers
1193
1193
New contributor
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Joseph Rogers is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This seems like mostly speculation about some situation that you have no evidence of after your main answer of "we don't know". It might be better to instead focus this on the "we don't know" aspect and back it up with evidence for why we don't know.
– TheLethalCarrot
yesterday
valid criticism, thanks, I might have a bash at that later. I just found the "what if Kahn was resurected" line of reasoning to be an interesting thought experiment.
– Joseph Rogers
yesterday
2
@TheLethalCarrot I think "we don't know" is perfectly valid in this case. It would be perfectly reasonable for a later series to do precisely that : resurrect him as a result of the "genesis effect". As it stands it's an open question whether Khan's character would ever be resurrected in this way and there is no evidence to contradict this as possible. Asking for evidence to prove we don't know is absurd - the reason we don't know is because there's a lack of evidence to the contrary. There's no evidence possible to quote.
– StephenG
yesterday
add a comment |
This seems like mostly speculation about some situation that you have no evidence of after your main answer of "we don't know". It might be better to instead focus this on the "we don't know" aspect and back it up with evidence for why we don't know.
– TheLethalCarrot
yesterday
valid criticism, thanks, I might have a bash at that later. I just found the "what if Kahn was resurected" line of reasoning to be an interesting thought experiment.
– Joseph Rogers
yesterday
2
@TheLethalCarrot I think "we don't know" is perfectly valid in this case. It would be perfectly reasonable for a later series to do precisely that : resurrect him as a result of the "genesis effect". As it stands it's an open question whether Khan's character would ever be resurrected in this way and there is no evidence to contradict this as possible. Asking for evidence to prove we don't know is absurd - the reason we don't know is because there's a lack of evidence to the contrary. There's no evidence possible to quote.
– StephenG
yesterday
This seems like mostly speculation about some situation that you have no evidence of after your main answer of "we don't know". It might be better to instead focus this on the "we don't know" aspect and back it up with evidence for why we don't know.
– TheLethalCarrot
yesterday
This seems like mostly speculation about some situation that you have no evidence of after your main answer of "we don't know". It might be better to instead focus this on the "we don't know" aspect and back it up with evidence for why we don't know.
– TheLethalCarrot
yesterday
valid criticism, thanks, I might have a bash at that later. I just found the "what if Kahn was resurected" line of reasoning to be an interesting thought experiment.
– Joseph Rogers
yesterday
valid criticism, thanks, I might have a bash at that later. I just found the "what if Kahn was resurected" line of reasoning to be an interesting thought experiment.
– Joseph Rogers
yesterday
2
2
@TheLethalCarrot I think "we don't know" is perfectly valid in this case. It would be perfectly reasonable for a later series to do precisely that : resurrect him as a result of the "genesis effect". As it stands it's an open question whether Khan's character would ever be resurrected in this way and there is no evidence to contradict this as possible. Asking for evidence to prove we don't know is absurd - the reason we don't know is because there's a lack of evidence to the contrary. There's no evidence possible to quote.
– StephenG
yesterday
@TheLethalCarrot I think "we don't know" is perfectly valid in this case. It would be perfectly reasonable for a later series to do precisely that : resurrect him as a result of the "genesis effect". As it stands it's an open question whether Khan's character would ever be resurrected in this way and there is no evidence to contradict this as possible. Asking for evidence to prove we don't know is absurd - the reason we don't know is because there's a lack of evidence to the contrary. There's no evidence possible to quote.
– StephenG
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Science Fiction & Fantasy Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fscifi.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f208067%2fwhy-didnt-khan-get-resurrected-in-the-genesis-explosion%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
6
Khan's body would have been obliterated, blasted into billions of tiny little pieces, and altogether vaporized in the explosion, as opposed to Spock, whose carcass was torpedoed to the burgeoning Genesis planet? Remember, the wave destroys life, "in favour of its new matrix.". Khan and his crew were caught up in the destructive, life-killing part of the wave.. Spock's body was part of the 'new matrix"
– NKCampbell
2 days ago
3
Maybe he did, in the centre of the planet. Being confined, for his pride and rebellion, in something geometrically resembling the Ninth Circle of Hell seems appropriate for someone who quotes Milton.
– Gaultheria
2 days ago
@Gaultheria Maybe Kruge was swallowed up by Khan, who had become a lava-spewing Balrog like being at the core of the Genesis planet.
– Deepak
yesterday