FirewallD not working properly on Fedora 25 The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSAMBA/CIFS connection errorwhat is `firewalld --nofork`Fedora 21 Port Forwarding with firewalld (firewall-cmd); how does it REALLY work? Or, does it?Fedora FirewallD blocking connection when disabledFirewalld forwarding between zones not workingFirewallD allow IP Range to port not workingFedora 25: firewalld settings won't take effectWindows interface rendering not working properly in Fedorafirewalld failed to apply rules / set_rule() failure when --reloadWhy systemctl reload firewalld on centos7 is not working?Keyboard not working properly on my ASUS laptop with Fedora
Running a General Election and the European Elections together
Why doesn't UK go for the same deal Japan has with EU to resolve Brexit?
Should I tutor a student who I know has cheated on their homework?
Rotate a column
What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?
Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"
Is it my responsibility to learn a new technology in my own time my employer wants to implement?
Flying from Cape Town to England and return to another province
How to delete every two lines after 3rd lines in a file contains very large number of lines?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
Is micro rebar a better way to reinforce concrete than rebar?
The exact meaning of 'Mom made me a sandwich'
Calculator final project in Python
Method for adding error messages to a dictionary given a key
If the heap is zero-initialized for security, then why is the stack merely uninitialized?
Why the difference in type-inference over the as-pattern in two similar function definitions?
Why is information "lost" when it got into a black hole?
Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis
Poetry, calligrams and TikZ/PStricks challenge
A small doubt about the dominated convergence theorem
Easy to read palindrome checker
Find non-case sensitive string in a mixed list of elements?
Do they change the text of the seder in Israel?
What flight has the highest ratio of timezone difference to flight time?
FirewallD not working properly on Fedora 25
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowSAMBA/CIFS connection errorwhat is `firewalld --nofork`Fedora 21 Port Forwarding with firewalld (firewall-cmd); how does it REALLY work? Or, does it?Fedora FirewallD blocking connection when disabledFirewalld forwarding between zones not workingFirewallD allow IP Range to port not workingFedora 25: firewalld settings won't take effectWindows interface rendering not working properly in Fedorafirewalld failed to apply rules / set_rule() failure when --reloadWhy systemctl reload firewalld on centos7 is not working?Keyboard not working properly on my ASUS laptop with Fedora
I don't know what happened with FirewallD on recent updates but it's all messed up, first I had issues with my active rules on Fedora 24, where I supposedly have the samba-server services enabled but I couldnt connect, the solution was to manually add the 145 and 339 ports. But things get worse on Fedora 25, where I just can't even set a default zone. I can execute the firewall-cmd --set-default-zone FedoraServer
command properly, however, upon issuing firewall-cmd --reload
I get an error about a bad argument COMMIT. And on top of all if I just do systemctl restart firewalld
I lose all the changes I made, e.g. if I now run firewall-cmd --get-default-zone
I get an empty string. What's even worse is that runtime changes don't even come into effect because if I run firewall-cmd --add-port 22/tcp
I can't still connect because (surprise!) none of my interfaces is bound to a zone (not even the default) and I can't even set a default zone because well, I can't even reload the service to apply changes. Has anyone run into these issues? How can I go about this? Right now, both my production servers are running without a firewall and this is driving me mad.
Edit:
These are two "strange" things in the log of systemctl status firewalld
when the service is stopped (systemctl stop firewalld
):
ERROR: Failed to flush eb firewall: '/usr/sbin/ebtables-restore --noflush' failed: Bad argument : 'COMMIT'.
...
ERROR: Failed to set policy of eb firewall: '/usr/sbin/ebtables-restore --noflush' failed: Bad argument : 'COMMIT'.
fedora firewalld
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 days ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I don't know what happened with FirewallD on recent updates but it's all messed up, first I had issues with my active rules on Fedora 24, where I supposedly have the samba-server services enabled but I couldnt connect, the solution was to manually add the 145 and 339 ports. But things get worse on Fedora 25, where I just can't even set a default zone. I can execute the firewall-cmd --set-default-zone FedoraServer
command properly, however, upon issuing firewall-cmd --reload
I get an error about a bad argument COMMIT. And on top of all if I just do systemctl restart firewalld
I lose all the changes I made, e.g. if I now run firewall-cmd --get-default-zone
I get an empty string. What's even worse is that runtime changes don't even come into effect because if I run firewall-cmd --add-port 22/tcp
I can't still connect because (surprise!) none of my interfaces is bound to a zone (not even the default) and I can't even set a default zone because well, I can't even reload the service to apply changes. Has anyone run into these issues? How can I go about this? Right now, both my production servers are running without a firewall and this is driving me mad.
Edit:
These are two "strange" things in the log of systemctl status firewalld
when the service is stopped (systemctl stop firewalld
):
ERROR: Failed to flush eb firewall: '/usr/sbin/ebtables-restore --noflush' failed: Bad argument : 'COMMIT'.
...
ERROR: Failed to set policy of eb firewall: '/usr/sbin/ebtables-restore --noflush' failed: Bad argument : 'COMMIT'.
fedora firewalld
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 days ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
systemctl status firewalld
reports something interesting?
– Jakuje
Dec 11 '16 at 8:24
add a comment |
I don't know what happened with FirewallD on recent updates but it's all messed up, first I had issues with my active rules on Fedora 24, where I supposedly have the samba-server services enabled but I couldnt connect, the solution was to manually add the 145 and 339 ports. But things get worse on Fedora 25, where I just can't even set a default zone. I can execute the firewall-cmd --set-default-zone FedoraServer
command properly, however, upon issuing firewall-cmd --reload
I get an error about a bad argument COMMIT. And on top of all if I just do systemctl restart firewalld
I lose all the changes I made, e.g. if I now run firewall-cmd --get-default-zone
I get an empty string. What's even worse is that runtime changes don't even come into effect because if I run firewall-cmd --add-port 22/tcp
I can't still connect because (surprise!) none of my interfaces is bound to a zone (not even the default) and I can't even set a default zone because well, I can't even reload the service to apply changes. Has anyone run into these issues? How can I go about this? Right now, both my production servers are running without a firewall and this is driving me mad.
Edit:
These are two "strange" things in the log of systemctl status firewalld
when the service is stopped (systemctl stop firewalld
):
ERROR: Failed to flush eb firewall: '/usr/sbin/ebtables-restore --noflush' failed: Bad argument : 'COMMIT'.
...
ERROR: Failed to set policy of eb firewall: '/usr/sbin/ebtables-restore --noflush' failed: Bad argument : 'COMMIT'.
fedora firewalld
I don't know what happened with FirewallD on recent updates but it's all messed up, first I had issues with my active rules on Fedora 24, where I supposedly have the samba-server services enabled but I couldnt connect, the solution was to manually add the 145 and 339 ports. But things get worse on Fedora 25, where I just can't even set a default zone. I can execute the firewall-cmd --set-default-zone FedoraServer
command properly, however, upon issuing firewall-cmd --reload
I get an error about a bad argument COMMIT. And on top of all if I just do systemctl restart firewalld
I lose all the changes I made, e.g. if I now run firewall-cmd --get-default-zone
I get an empty string. What's even worse is that runtime changes don't even come into effect because if I run firewall-cmd --add-port 22/tcp
I can't still connect because (surprise!) none of my interfaces is bound to a zone (not even the default) and I can't even set a default zone because well, I can't even reload the service to apply changes. Has anyone run into these issues? How can I go about this? Right now, both my production servers are running without a firewall and this is driving me mad.
Edit:
These are two "strange" things in the log of systemctl status firewalld
when the service is stopped (systemctl stop firewalld
):
ERROR: Failed to flush eb firewall: '/usr/sbin/ebtables-restore --noflush' failed: Bad argument : 'COMMIT'.
...
ERROR: Failed to set policy of eb firewall: '/usr/sbin/ebtables-restore --noflush' failed: Bad argument : 'COMMIT'.
fedora firewalld
fedora firewalld
edited Apr 13 '17 at 12:36
Community♦
1
1
asked Dec 11 '16 at 6:55
arielnmzarielnmz
302214
302214
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 days ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 2 days ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
systemctl status firewalld
reports something interesting?
– Jakuje
Dec 11 '16 at 8:24
add a comment |
systemctl status firewalld
reports something interesting?
– Jakuje
Dec 11 '16 at 8:24
systemctl status firewalld
reports something interesting?– Jakuje
Dec 11 '16 at 8:24
systemctl status firewalld
reports something interesting?– Jakuje
Dec 11 '16 at 8:24
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
You need to add the --permanent
argument, otherwise you’re only changing the runtime configuration. When you reload the configuration, you’re removing all runtime configuration and loading in the permanent configuration. Similarly, when you restart the service or the system – runtime configuration is also lost. Read When is it necessary to reload FirewallD configuration? for a better explanation.
As for the COMMIT errors you’re seeing; your system must have some ebtables rules somewhere in your iptables. This is unsupported as per the firewalld.spec. Remove all your iptables firewall rules and try configuring your firewalld again without mixing management toolchains.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f329547%2ffirewalld-not-working-properly-on-fedora-25%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You need to add the --permanent
argument, otherwise you’re only changing the runtime configuration. When you reload the configuration, you’re removing all runtime configuration and loading in the permanent configuration. Similarly, when you restart the service or the system – runtime configuration is also lost. Read When is it necessary to reload FirewallD configuration? for a better explanation.
As for the COMMIT errors you’re seeing; your system must have some ebtables rules somewhere in your iptables. This is unsupported as per the firewalld.spec. Remove all your iptables firewall rules and try configuring your firewalld again without mixing management toolchains.
add a comment |
You need to add the --permanent
argument, otherwise you’re only changing the runtime configuration. When you reload the configuration, you’re removing all runtime configuration and loading in the permanent configuration. Similarly, when you restart the service or the system – runtime configuration is also lost. Read When is it necessary to reload FirewallD configuration? for a better explanation.
As for the COMMIT errors you’re seeing; your system must have some ebtables rules somewhere in your iptables. This is unsupported as per the firewalld.spec. Remove all your iptables firewall rules and try configuring your firewalld again without mixing management toolchains.
add a comment |
You need to add the --permanent
argument, otherwise you’re only changing the runtime configuration. When you reload the configuration, you’re removing all runtime configuration and loading in the permanent configuration. Similarly, when you restart the service or the system – runtime configuration is also lost. Read When is it necessary to reload FirewallD configuration? for a better explanation.
As for the COMMIT errors you’re seeing; your system must have some ebtables rules somewhere in your iptables. This is unsupported as per the firewalld.spec. Remove all your iptables firewall rules and try configuring your firewalld again without mixing management toolchains.
You need to add the --permanent
argument, otherwise you’re only changing the runtime configuration. When you reload the configuration, you’re removing all runtime configuration and loading in the permanent configuration. Similarly, when you restart the service or the system – runtime configuration is also lost. Read When is it necessary to reload FirewallD configuration? for a better explanation.
As for the COMMIT errors you’re seeing; your system must have some ebtables rules somewhere in your iptables. This is unsupported as per the firewalld.spec. Remove all your iptables firewall rules and try configuring your firewalld again without mixing management toolchains.
answered Feb 14 '17 at 6:25
AeyounAeyoun
5801924
5801924
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f329547%2ffirewalld-not-working-properly-on-fedora-25%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
systemctl status firewalld
reports something interesting?– Jakuje
Dec 11 '16 at 8:24