Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?Understanding why some IPs don't have a mask addressHow much influence does multicast and IPv6 have on latency?Simple network mask questionIs the structure of the CEF IPv6 trie similar with the IPv4 trie structure?IPv6: is it possible to use a /64 block when you have multiple routers?How does a browser understand a subnet mask in IPv4?How does IPv6 AH guarranties authentication?Does every subnet have broadcast and network addresses?IPv6 address scheme for network gearHow can know the subnet mask in IPv6 network?
What prevents the use of a multi-segment ILS for non-straight approaches?
Is the U.S. Code copyrighted by the Government?
Travelling outside the UK without a passport
The IT department bottlenecks progress. How should I handle this?
A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?
Where does the bonus feat in the cleric starting package come from?
What does chmod -u do?
Non-trope happy ending?
Problem with TransformedDistribution
Aragorn's "guise" in the Orthanc Stone
Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?
Has any country ever had 2 former presidents in jail simultaneously?
"Spoil" vs "Ruin"
Did arcade monitors have same pixel aspect ratio as TV sets?
How can "mimic phobia" be cured or prevented?
How do you respond to a colleague from another team when they're wrongly expecting that you'll help them?
Is it better practice to read straight from sheet music rather than memorize it?
Is there a name for this algorithm to calculate the concentration of a mixture of two solutions containing the same solute?
Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?
Is there a working SACD iso player for Ubuntu?
Why Shazam when there is already Superman?
I am looking for the correct translation of love for the phrase "in this sign love"
What was this official D&D 3.5e Lovecraft-flavored rulebook?
If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?
Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?
Understanding why some IPs don't have a mask addressHow much influence does multicast and IPv6 have on latency?Simple network mask questionIs the structure of the CEF IPv6 trie similar with the IPv4 trie structure?IPv6: is it possible to use a /64 block when you have multiple routers?How does a browser understand a subnet mask in IPv4?How does IPv6 AH guarranties authentication?Does every subnet have broadcast and network addresses?IPv6 address scheme for network gearHow can know the subnet mask in IPv6 network?
Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?
How does it represent a network?
In the output of ifconfig, does prefixlen 128 represent a network mask?
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 1552397 bytes 88437726 (88.4 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 1552397 bytes 88437726 (88.4 MB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
Thanks.
subnet ipv6
asked yesterday
TimTim
546416
add a comment |
Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?
How does it represent a network?
In the output of ifconfig, does prefixlen 128 represent a network mask?
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 1552397 bytes 88437726 (88.4 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 1552397 bytes 88437726 (88.4 MB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
Thanks.
subnet ipv6
asked yesterday
TimTim
546416
add a comment |
Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?
How does it represent a network?
In the output of ifconfig, does prefixlen 128 represent a network mask?
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 1552397 bytes 88437726 (88.4 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 1552397 bytes 88437726 (88.4 MB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
Thanks.
subnet ipv6
asked yesterday
TimTim
546416
Does IPv6 have similar concept of network mask?
How does it represent a network?
In the output of ifconfig, does prefixlen 128 represent a network mask?
lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536
inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.0.0.0
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 scopeid 0x10<host>
loop txqueuelen 1000 (Local Loopback)
RX packets 1552397 bytes 88437726 (88.4 MB)
RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0
TX packets 1552397 bytes 88437726 (88.4 MB)
TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0
Thanks.
subnet ipv6
subnet ipv6
asked yesterday
TimTim
546416
asked yesterday
TimTim
546416
edited yesterday
Tim
asked yesterday
TimTim
546416
asked yesterday
TimTim
546416
asked yesterday
TimTim
546416
546416
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
IPv6 uses network masks exactly the same way as IPv4. The only real difference is that they're much longer (128 bits). IPv6 uses the slash notation exclusively (no dotted decimal), so masks range from /0 to /128.
Becasue of the much larger address space, it's rare to see a mask length longer than /64.
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
38.6k33779
Thanks. IPv6 address itself is 128 bits, If a network mask is 128 bits, does that mean the network only has one host? See my update for an example
– Tim
yesterday
Yes. It's the equivalent of using a /32 for IPv4.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
Do you mean prefixlen 128 represent a network mask? How can the network for prefixlen 128 (only one host) be so different from the network for the IPv4 network mask 255.0.0.0 (have many hosts) for the same network interface? Do they represent the same network?
– Tim
yesterday
4
They are different addressing schemes, so there is no correspondence between them. Also, the IPv4 loopback address, 127.0.0.1, is always written with a /8 mask (per the RFC), even though technically, there's only one host.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
1
@chrylis, we have adopted/127for all our point-to-point links, except for the connection to the telcos, where they require/126because of the way IPv4 used/30. We have tried, and tried to explain things to them, but they will not listen, so we are careful to test in the lab that any devices we use to connect to them really are immune to the ping pong attack.
– Ron Maupin♦
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
Your example contains a netmask. It is however not specified as a bitmask since this would be very long and confusing but as the length of one-bits in the mask. This is called the prefix length and is given either separately (as in your example) or with slash notation:
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
This is equivalent to ::1/128 or
ip. 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001
mask ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
While the mask is pretty much the same as in v4 there are some conventions around assignment. For having a good notation the prefixlen is typically given in multiple of four and /64 is regarded as a single LAN (also required by some autoconf technologies).
If you think of ipv6 it is a good idea to regard the prefix always as dynamic and allow renumbering, then you are good to go.
answered yesterday
eckeseckes
1212
New contributor
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "496"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57867%2fdoes-ipv6-have-similar-concept-of-network-mask%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
IPv6 uses network masks exactly the same way as IPv4. The only real difference is that they're much longer (128 bits). IPv6 uses the slash notation exclusively (no dotted decimal), so masks range from /0 to /128.
Becasue of the much larger address space, it's rare to see a mask length longer than /64.
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
38.6k33779
Thanks. IPv6 address itself is 128 bits, If a network mask is 128 bits, does that mean the network only has one host? See my update for an example
– Tim
yesterday
Yes. It's the equivalent of using a /32 for IPv4.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
Do you mean prefixlen 128 represent a network mask? How can the network for prefixlen 128 (only one host) be so different from the network for the IPv4 network mask 255.0.0.0 (have many hosts) for the same network interface? Do they represent the same network?
– Tim
yesterday
4
They are different addressing schemes, so there is no correspondence between them. Also, the IPv4 loopback address, 127.0.0.1, is always written with a /8 mask (per the RFC), even though technically, there's only one host.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
1
@chrylis, we have adopted/127for all our point-to-point links, except for the connection to the telcos, where they require/126because of the way IPv4 used/30. We have tried, and tried to explain things to them, but they will not listen, so we are careful to test in the lab that any devices we use to connect to them really are immune to the ping pong attack.
– Ron Maupin♦
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
IPv6 uses network masks exactly the same way as IPv4. The only real difference is that they're much longer (128 bits). IPv6 uses the slash notation exclusively (no dotted decimal), so masks range from /0 to /128.
Becasue of the much larger address space, it's rare to see a mask length longer than /64.
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
38.6k33779
Thanks. IPv6 address itself is 128 bits, If a network mask is 128 bits, does that mean the network only has one host? See my update for an example
– Tim
yesterday
Yes. It's the equivalent of using a /32 for IPv4.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
Do you mean prefixlen 128 represent a network mask? How can the network for prefixlen 128 (only one host) be so different from the network for the IPv4 network mask 255.0.0.0 (have many hosts) for the same network interface? Do they represent the same network?
– Tim
yesterday
4
They are different addressing schemes, so there is no correspondence between them. Also, the IPv4 loopback address, 127.0.0.1, is always written with a /8 mask (per the RFC), even though technically, there's only one host.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
1
@chrylis, we have adopted/127for all our point-to-point links, except for the connection to the telcos, where they require/126because of the way IPv4 used/30. We have tried, and tried to explain things to them, but they will not listen, so we are careful to test in the lab that any devices we use to connect to them really are immune to the ping pong attack.
– Ron Maupin♦
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
IPv6 uses network masks exactly the same way as IPv4. The only real difference is that they're much longer (128 bits). IPv6 uses the slash notation exclusively (no dotted decimal), so masks range from /0 to /128.
Becasue of the much larger address space, it's rare to see a mask length longer than /64.
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
38.6k33779
IPv6 uses network masks exactly the same way as IPv4. The only real difference is that they're much longer (128 bits). IPv6 uses the slash notation exclusively (no dotted decimal), so masks range from /0 to /128.
Becasue of the much larger address space, it's rare to see a mask length longer than /64.
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
38.6k33779
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
38.6k33779
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
38.6k33779
answered yesterday
Ron TrunkRon Trunk
38.6k33779
38.6k33779
Thanks. IPv6 address itself is 128 bits, If a network mask is 128 bits, does that mean the network only has one host? See my update for an example
– Tim
yesterday
Yes. It's the equivalent of using a /32 for IPv4.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
Do you mean prefixlen 128 represent a network mask? How can the network for prefixlen 128 (only one host) be so different from the network for the IPv4 network mask 255.0.0.0 (have many hosts) for the same network interface? Do they represent the same network?
– Tim
yesterday
4
They are different addressing schemes, so there is no correspondence between them. Also, the IPv4 loopback address, 127.0.0.1, is always written with a /8 mask (per the RFC), even though technically, there's only one host.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
1
@chrylis, we have adopted/127for all our point-to-point links, except for the connection to the telcos, where they require/126because of the way IPv4 used/30. We have tried, and tried to explain things to them, but they will not listen, so we are careful to test in the lab that any devices we use to connect to them really are immune to the ping pong attack.
– Ron Maupin♦
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
Thanks. IPv6 address itself is 128 bits, If a network mask is 128 bits, does that mean the network only has one host? See my update for an example
– Tim
yesterday
Yes. It's the equivalent of using a /32 for IPv4.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
Do you mean prefixlen 128 represent a network mask? How can the network for prefixlen 128 (only one host) be so different from the network for the IPv4 network mask 255.0.0.0 (have many hosts) for the same network interface? Do they represent the same network?
– Tim
yesterday
4
They are different addressing schemes, so there is no correspondence between them. Also, the IPv4 loopback address, 127.0.0.1, is always written with a /8 mask (per the RFC), even though technically, there's only one host.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
1
@chrylis, we have adopted/127for all our point-to-point links, except for the connection to the telcos, where they require/126because of the way IPv4 used/30. We have tried, and tried to explain things to them, but they will not listen, so we are careful to test in the lab that any devices we use to connect to them really are immune to the ping pong attack.
– Ron Maupin♦
16 hours ago
Thanks. IPv6 address itself is 128 bits, If a network mask is 128 bits, does that mean the network only has one host? See my update for an example
– Tim
yesterday
Thanks. IPv6 address itself is 128 bits, If a network mask is 128 bits, does that mean the network only has one host? See my update for an example
– Tim
yesterday
Yes. It's the equivalent of using a /32 for IPv4.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
Yes. It's the equivalent of using a /32 for IPv4.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
Do you mean prefixlen 128 represent a network mask? How can the network for prefixlen 128 (only one host) be so different from the network for the IPv4 network mask 255.0.0.0 (have many hosts) for the same network interface? Do they represent the same network?
– Tim
yesterday
Do you mean prefixlen 128 represent a network mask? How can the network for prefixlen 128 (only one host) be so different from the network for the IPv4 network mask 255.0.0.0 (have many hosts) for the same network interface? Do they represent the same network?
– Tim
yesterday
4
4
They are different addressing schemes, so there is no correspondence between them. Also, the IPv4 loopback address, 127.0.0.1, is always written with a /8 mask (per the RFC), even though technically, there's only one host.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
They are different addressing schemes, so there is no correspondence between them. Also, the IPv4 loopback address, 127.0.0.1, is always written with a /8 mask (per the RFC), even though technically, there's only one host.
– Ron Trunk
yesterday
1
1
@chrylis, we have adopted
/127 for all our point-to-point links, except for the connection to the telcos, where they require /126 because of the way IPv4 used /30. We have tried, and tried to explain things to them, but they will not listen, so we are careful to test in the lab that any devices we use to connect to them really are immune to the ping pong attack.– Ron Maupin♦
16 hours ago
@chrylis, we have adopted
/127 for all our point-to-point links, except for the connection to the telcos, where they require /126 because of the way IPv4 used /30. We have tried, and tried to explain things to them, but they will not listen, so we are careful to test in the lab that any devices we use to connect to them really are immune to the ping pong attack.– Ron Maupin♦
16 hours ago
|
show 8 more comments
Your example contains a netmask. It is however not specified as a bitmask since this would be very long and confusing but as the length of one-bits in the mask. This is called the prefix length and is given either separately (as in your example) or with slash notation:
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
This is equivalent to ::1/128 or
ip. 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001
mask ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
While the mask is pretty much the same as in v4 there are some conventions around assignment. For having a good notation the prefixlen is typically given in multiple of four and /64 is regarded as a single LAN (also required by some autoconf technologies).
If you think of ipv6 it is a good idea to regard the prefix always as dynamic and allow renumbering, then you are good to go.
answered yesterday
eckeseckes
1212
New contributor
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your example contains a netmask. It is however not specified as a bitmask since this would be very long and confusing but as the length of one-bits in the mask. This is called the prefix length and is given either separately (as in your example) or with slash notation:
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
This is equivalent to ::1/128 or
ip. 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001
mask ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
While the mask is pretty much the same as in v4 there are some conventions around assignment. For having a good notation the prefixlen is typically given in multiple of four and /64 is regarded as a single LAN (also required by some autoconf technologies).
If you think of ipv6 it is a good idea to regard the prefix always as dynamic and allow renumbering, then you are good to go.
answered yesterday
eckeseckes
1212
New contributor
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Your example contains a netmask. It is however not specified as a bitmask since this would be very long and confusing but as the length of one-bits in the mask. This is called the prefix length and is given either separately (as in your example) or with slash notation:
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
This is equivalent to ::1/128 or
ip. 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001
mask ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
While the mask is pretty much the same as in v4 there are some conventions around assignment. For having a good notation the prefixlen is typically given in multiple of four and /64 is regarded as a single LAN (also required by some autoconf technologies).
If you think of ipv6 it is a good idea to regard the prefix always as dynamic and allow renumbering, then you are good to go.
answered yesterday
eckeseckes
1212
New contributor
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Your example contains a netmask. It is however not specified as a bitmask since this would be very long and confusing but as the length of one-bits in the mask. This is called the prefix length and is given either separately (as in your example) or with slash notation:
inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128
This is equivalent to ::1/128 or
ip. 0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0000:0001
mask ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff:ffff
While the mask is pretty much the same as in v4 there are some conventions around assignment. For having a good notation the prefixlen is typically given in multiple of four and /64 is regarded as a single LAN (also required by some autoconf technologies).
If you think of ipv6 it is a good idea to regard the prefix always as dynamic and allow renumbering, then you are good to go.
answered yesterday
eckeseckes
1212
New contributor
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
eckeseckes
1212
New contributor
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered yesterday
eckeseckes
1212
answered yesterday
eckeseckes
1212
1212
New contributor
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
eckes is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Network Engineering Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fnetworkengineering.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f57867%2fdoes-ipv6-have-similar-concept-of-network-mask%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
