How to cover method return statement in Apex Class?2019 Community Moderator ElectionIssues with calling 2 setTest methods in apex test classComparison fails when converting Opportunity from/to JSONSimple Apex class to return a list of stringsCompilation error with a unit testschema.getglobaldescribe needs test classTrouble creating test to cover codeHow to cover afterUndelete method when you can't UndeleteCannot Return a List of Strings - Void method must not return a valueHow to cover global class and method in test classHello i am not able to get the result from this test class

Biological Blimps: Propulsion

If a character has darkvision, can they see through an area of nonmagical darkness filled with lightly obscuring gas?

Intuition of generalized eigenvector.

What is Cash Advance APR?

How can Trident be so inexpensive? Will it orbit Triton or just do a (slow) flyby?

Open a doc from terminal, but not by its name

Closed-form expression for certain product

Approximating irrational number to rational number

Freedom of speech and where it applies

Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country

Multiplicative persistence

The screen of my macbook suddenly broken down how can I do to recover

What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?

Offered money to buy a house, seller is asking for more to cover gap between their listing and mortgage owed

Why do we read the Megillah by night and by day?

What prevents the use of a multi-segment ILS for non-straight approaches?

Calculating Wattage for Resistor in High Frequency Application?

why `nmap 192.168.1.97` returns less services than `nmap 127.0.0.1`?

Loading commands from file

Why did the EU agree to delay the Brexit deadline?

How to implement a feedback to keep the DC gain at zero for this conceptual passive filter?

Why should universal income be universal?

A social experiment. What is the worst that can happen?

What should you do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?



How to cover method return statement in Apex Class?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionIssues with calling 2 setTest methods in apex test classComparison fails when converting Opportunity from/to JSONSimple Apex class to return a list of stringsCompilation error with a unit testschema.getglobaldescribe needs test classTrouble creating test to cover codeHow to cover afterUndelete method when you can't UndeleteCannot Return a List of Strings - Void method must not return a valueHow to cover global class and method in test classHello i am not able to get the result from this test class










5















I'm writing a test for a schedulable class and so far it's working fine but I can't get the return statement to be covered by the test class. I'm missing something here and can't see it.



The final returns on getMonthName (return Name) and getQuarter(Return Quarter) methods are not covered by the test class.



Here the Schedulable Class:



global class MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection implements Schedulable 



global void execute(SchedulableContext SC)

ListofLeases();



global static void ListOfLeases ()

List<Margin_Report_Data__c> Corrections = new List<Margin_Report_Data__c>();

//Loop for year

Integer m=date.today().month();
for (Integer y=date.today().year(); y <= 2026 ; y++ )

//Loop for month



while (m <=12)


Margin_Report_Data__c mrd = new Margin_Report_Data__c();
mrd.Account__c='001f000001Fd5sIAAR';
mrd.Customer__c = 'LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.';
mrd.Transaction_Date__c = date.newInstance(y, m, 1);
mrd.Transaction_Year__c = string.valueOf(y);
mrd.Transaction_Month__c = getMonthName(m);
mrd.Transaction_Quarter__c = getQuarter(m);
mrd.Program_Revenue__c = 'No';
mrd.Sale_Category__c='Leases';
mrd.Region__c='LA';
mrd.Total_Sales__c = 194800;
mrd.Total_Gross_Profit__c = 194800;
mrd.Post_Status__c = 'Posted';
mrd.Transaction_Description__c = 'Sale Income Adjustment for LATAM Lease';

Corrections.add(mrd);
m++;



m=1;


for (Margin_Report_Data__c mr : Corrections)



insert Corrections;


//Converting month number to month name
global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
String Name;
Switch on Month
when 1
Name='January';
return Name;

when 2
Name='February';
return Name;

when 3
Name='March';
return Name;

when 4
Name='April';
return Name;

when 5
Name='May';
return Name;

when 6
Name='June';
return Name;

when 7
Name='July';
return Name;

when 8
Name='August';
return Name;

when 9
Name='September';
return Name;

when 10
Name='October';
return Name;

when 11
Name='November';
return Name;

when 12
Name='December';
return Name;


return Name; //<-- This is not covered


//Converting month number to year quarter
global static String getQuarter (Integer Month)
String Quarter;
Switch on Month
when 1
Quarter = 'Q1';
return Quarter;

when 2
Quarter = 'Q1';
return Quarter;

when 3
Quarter = 'Q1';
return Quarter;

when 4
Quarter = 'Q2';
return Quarter;

when 5
Quarter = 'Q2';
return Quarter;

when 6
Quarter = 'Q2';
return Quarter;

when 7
Quarter = 'Q3';
return Quarter;

when 8
Quarter = 'Q3';
return Quarter;

when 9
Quarter = 'Q3';
return Quarter;

when 10
Quarter = 'Q4';
return Quarter;

when 11
Quarter = 'Q4';
return Quarter;

when 12
Quarter = 'Q4';
return Quarter;


return Quarter; //<-- This is not covered






Here's the test class:



 @IsTest
public class MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection_Test

@IsTest static void TestDeleteData()


//Setup Margin Report
Margin_Report_Data__c MarginReport = new Margin_Report_Data__c (Transaction_Month__c='January', Transaction_Year__c='2018', Document_Number__c='10', Sales_Order__c='12345');


Test.startTest();

MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection mrdc = new MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection();
String sch = '0 59 12 * * ?';
system.schedule('Test MR Lease Correction', sch, mrdc);
mrdc.execute(null);

Test.stoptest();

List <Margin_Report_Data__c> resultmr = [SELECT id FROM Margin_Report_Data__c WHERE Customer__c = 'LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.' AND Sale_Category__c = 'Leases'];


System.debug('MRD With Leases?:'+ resultmr.size());
System.assertEquals(true, resultmr.size()>0);













share|improve this question




























    5















    I'm writing a test for a schedulable class and so far it's working fine but I can't get the return statement to be covered by the test class. I'm missing something here and can't see it.



    The final returns on getMonthName (return Name) and getQuarter(Return Quarter) methods are not covered by the test class.



    Here the Schedulable Class:



    global class MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection implements Schedulable 



    global void execute(SchedulableContext SC)

    ListofLeases();



    global static void ListOfLeases ()

    List<Margin_Report_Data__c> Corrections = new List<Margin_Report_Data__c>();

    //Loop for year

    Integer m=date.today().month();
    for (Integer y=date.today().year(); y <= 2026 ; y++ )

    //Loop for month



    while (m <=12)


    Margin_Report_Data__c mrd = new Margin_Report_Data__c();
    mrd.Account__c='001f000001Fd5sIAAR';
    mrd.Customer__c = 'LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.';
    mrd.Transaction_Date__c = date.newInstance(y, m, 1);
    mrd.Transaction_Year__c = string.valueOf(y);
    mrd.Transaction_Month__c = getMonthName(m);
    mrd.Transaction_Quarter__c = getQuarter(m);
    mrd.Program_Revenue__c = 'No';
    mrd.Sale_Category__c='Leases';
    mrd.Region__c='LA';
    mrd.Total_Sales__c = 194800;
    mrd.Total_Gross_Profit__c = 194800;
    mrd.Post_Status__c = 'Posted';
    mrd.Transaction_Description__c = 'Sale Income Adjustment for LATAM Lease';

    Corrections.add(mrd);
    m++;



    m=1;


    for (Margin_Report_Data__c mr : Corrections)



    insert Corrections;


    //Converting month number to month name
    global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
    String Name;
    Switch on Month
    when 1
    Name='January';
    return Name;

    when 2
    Name='February';
    return Name;

    when 3
    Name='March';
    return Name;

    when 4
    Name='April';
    return Name;

    when 5
    Name='May';
    return Name;

    when 6
    Name='June';
    return Name;

    when 7
    Name='July';
    return Name;

    when 8
    Name='August';
    return Name;

    when 9
    Name='September';
    return Name;

    when 10
    Name='October';
    return Name;

    when 11
    Name='November';
    return Name;

    when 12
    Name='December';
    return Name;


    return Name; //<-- This is not covered


    //Converting month number to year quarter
    global static String getQuarter (Integer Month)
    String Quarter;
    Switch on Month
    when 1
    Quarter = 'Q1';
    return Quarter;

    when 2
    Quarter = 'Q1';
    return Quarter;

    when 3
    Quarter = 'Q1';
    return Quarter;

    when 4
    Quarter = 'Q2';
    return Quarter;

    when 5
    Quarter = 'Q2';
    return Quarter;

    when 6
    Quarter = 'Q2';
    return Quarter;

    when 7
    Quarter = 'Q3';
    return Quarter;

    when 8
    Quarter = 'Q3';
    return Quarter;

    when 9
    Quarter = 'Q3';
    return Quarter;

    when 10
    Quarter = 'Q4';
    return Quarter;

    when 11
    Quarter = 'Q4';
    return Quarter;

    when 12
    Quarter = 'Q4';
    return Quarter;


    return Quarter; //<-- This is not covered






    Here's the test class:



     @IsTest
    public class MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection_Test

    @IsTest static void TestDeleteData()


    //Setup Margin Report
    Margin_Report_Data__c MarginReport = new Margin_Report_Data__c (Transaction_Month__c='January', Transaction_Year__c='2018', Document_Number__c='10', Sales_Order__c='12345');


    Test.startTest();

    MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection mrdc = new MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection();
    String sch = '0 59 12 * * ?';
    system.schedule('Test MR Lease Correction', sch, mrdc);
    mrdc.execute(null);

    Test.stoptest();

    List <Margin_Report_Data__c> resultmr = [SELECT id FROM Margin_Report_Data__c WHERE Customer__c = 'LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.' AND Sale_Category__c = 'Leases'];


    System.debug('MRD With Leases?:'+ resultmr.size());
    System.assertEquals(true, resultmr.size()>0);













    share|improve this question


























      5












      5








      5








      I'm writing a test for a schedulable class and so far it's working fine but I can't get the return statement to be covered by the test class. I'm missing something here and can't see it.



      The final returns on getMonthName (return Name) and getQuarter(Return Quarter) methods are not covered by the test class.



      Here the Schedulable Class:



      global class MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection implements Schedulable 



      global void execute(SchedulableContext SC)

      ListofLeases();



      global static void ListOfLeases ()

      List<Margin_Report_Data__c> Corrections = new List<Margin_Report_Data__c>();

      //Loop for year

      Integer m=date.today().month();
      for (Integer y=date.today().year(); y <= 2026 ; y++ )

      //Loop for month



      while (m <=12)


      Margin_Report_Data__c mrd = new Margin_Report_Data__c();
      mrd.Account__c='001f000001Fd5sIAAR';
      mrd.Customer__c = 'LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.';
      mrd.Transaction_Date__c = date.newInstance(y, m, 1);
      mrd.Transaction_Year__c = string.valueOf(y);
      mrd.Transaction_Month__c = getMonthName(m);
      mrd.Transaction_Quarter__c = getQuarter(m);
      mrd.Program_Revenue__c = 'No';
      mrd.Sale_Category__c='Leases';
      mrd.Region__c='LA';
      mrd.Total_Sales__c = 194800;
      mrd.Total_Gross_Profit__c = 194800;
      mrd.Post_Status__c = 'Posted';
      mrd.Transaction_Description__c = 'Sale Income Adjustment for LATAM Lease';

      Corrections.add(mrd);
      m++;



      m=1;


      for (Margin_Report_Data__c mr : Corrections)



      insert Corrections;


      //Converting month number to month name
      global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
      String Name;
      Switch on Month
      when 1
      Name='January';
      return Name;

      when 2
      Name='February';
      return Name;

      when 3
      Name='March';
      return Name;

      when 4
      Name='April';
      return Name;

      when 5
      Name='May';
      return Name;

      when 6
      Name='June';
      return Name;

      when 7
      Name='July';
      return Name;

      when 8
      Name='August';
      return Name;

      when 9
      Name='September';
      return Name;

      when 10
      Name='October';
      return Name;

      when 11
      Name='November';
      return Name;

      when 12
      Name='December';
      return Name;


      return Name; //<-- This is not covered


      //Converting month number to year quarter
      global static String getQuarter (Integer Month)
      String Quarter;
      Switch on Month
      when 1
      Quarter = 'Q1';
      return Quarter;

      when 2
      Quarter = 'Q1';
      return Quarter;

      when 3
      Quarter = 'Q1';
      return Quarter;

      when 4
      Quarter = 'Q2';
      return Quarter;

      when 5
      Quarter = 'Q2';
      return Quarter;

      when 6
      Quarter = 'Q2';
      return Quarter;

      when 7
      Quarter = 'Q3';
      return Quarter;

      when 8
      Quarter = 'Q3';
      return Quarter;

      when 9
      Quarter = 'Q3';
      return Quarter;

      when 10
      Quarter = 'Q4';
      return Quarter;

      when 11
      Quarter = 'Q4';
      return Quarter;

      when 12
      Quarter = 'Q4';
      return Quarter;


      return Quarter; //<-- This is not covered






      Here's the test class:



       @IsTest
      public class MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection_Test

      @IsTest static void TestDeleteData()


      //Setup Margin Report
      Margin_Report_Data__c MarginReport = new Margin_Report_Data__c (Transaction_Month__c='January', Transaction_Year__c='2018', Document_Number__c='10', Sales_Order__c='12345');


      Test.startTest();

      MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection mrdc = new MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection();
      String sch = '0 59 12 * * ?';
      system.schedule('Test MR Lease Correction', sch, mrdc);
      mrdc.execute(null);

      Test.stoptest();

      List <Margin_Report_Data__c> resultmr = [SELECT id FROM Margin_Report_Data__c WHERE Customer__c = 'LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.' AND Sale_Category__c = 'Leases'];


      System.debug('MRD With Leases?:'+ resultmr.size());
      System.assertEquals(true, resultmr.size()>0);













      share|improve this question
















      I'm writing a test for a schedulable class and so far it's working fine but I can't get the return statement to be covered by the test class. I'm missing something here and can't see it.



      The final returns on getMonthName (return Name) and getQuarter(Return Quarter) methods are not covered by the test class.



      Here the Schedulable Class:



      global class MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection implements Schedulable 



      global void execute(SchedulableContext SC)

      ListofLeases();



      global static void ListOfLeases ()

      List<Margin_Report_Data__c> Corrections = new List<Margin_Report_Data__c>();

      //Loop for year

      Integer m=date.today().month();
      for (Integer y=date.today().year(); y <= 2026 ; y++ )

      //Loop for month



      while (m <=12)


      Margin_Report_Data__c mrd = new Margin_Report_Data__c();
      mrd.Account__c='001f000001Fd5sIAAR';
      mrd.Customer__c = 'LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.';
      mrd.Transaction_Date__c = date.newInstance(y, m, 1);
      mrd.Transaction_Year__c = string.valueOf(y);
      mrd.Transaction_Month__c = getMonthName(m);
      mrd.Transaction_Quarter__c = getQuarter(m);
      mrd.Program_Revenue__c = 'No';
      mrd.Sale_Category__c='Leases';
      mrd.Region__c='LA';
      mrd.Total_Sales__c = 194800;
      mrd.Total_Gross_Profit__c = 194800;
      mrd.Post_Status__c = 'Posted';
      mrd.Transaction_Description__c = 'Sale Income Adjustment for LATAM Lease';

      Corrections.add(mrd);
      m++;



      m=1;


      for (Margin_Report_Data__c mr : Corrections)



      insert Corrections;


      //Converting month number to month name
      global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
      String Name;
      Switch on Month
      when 1
      Name='January';
      return Name;

      when 2
      Name='February';
      return Name;

      when 3
      Name='March';
      return Name;

      when 4
      Name='April';
      return Name;

      when 5
      Name='May';
      return Name;

      when 6
      Name='June';
      return Name;

      when 7
      Name='July';
      return Name;

      when 8
      Name='August';
      return Name;

      when 9
      Name='September';
      return Name;

      when 10
      Name='October';
      return Name;

      when 11
      Name='November';
      return Name;

      when 12
      Name='December';
      return Name;


      return Name; //<-- This is not covered


      //Converting month number to year quarter
      global static String getQuarter (Integer Month)
      String Quarter;
      Switch on Month
      when 1
      Quarter = 'Q1';
      return Quarter;

      when 2
      Quarter = 'Q1';
      return Quarter;

      when 3
      Quarter = 'Q1';
      return Quarter;

      when 4
      Quarter = 'Q2';
      return Quarter;

      when 5
      Quarter = 'Q2';
      return Quarter;

      when 6
      Quarter = 'Q2';
      return Quarter;

      when 7
      Quarter = 'Q3';
      return Quarter;

      when 8
      Quarter = 'Q3';
      return Quarter;

      when 9
      Quarter = 'Q3';
      return Quarter;

      when 10
      Quarter = 'Q4';
      return Quarter;

      when 11
      Quarter = 'Q4';
      return Quarter;

      when 12
      Quarter = 'Q4';
      return Quarter;


      return Quarter; //<-- This is not covered






      Here's the test class:



       @IsTest
      public class MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection_Test

      @IsTest static void TestDeleteData()


      //Setup Margin Report
      Margin_Report_Data__c MarginReport = new Margin_Report_Data__c (Transaction_Month__c='January', Transaction_Year__c='2018', Document_Number__c='10', Sales_Order__c='12345');


      Test.startTest();

      MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection mrdc = new MRD_LATAM_LeaseCorrection();
      String sch = '0 59 12 * * ?';
      system.schedule('Test MR Lease Correction', sch, mrdc);
      mrdc.execute(null);

      Test.stoptest();

      List <Margin_Report_Data__c> resultmr = [SELECT id FROM Margin_Report_Data__c WHERE Customer__c = 'LATAM AIRLINES GROUP S.A.' AND Sale_Category__c = 'Leases'];


      System.debug('MRD With Leases?:'+ resultmr.size());
      System.assertEquals(true, resultmr.size()>0);










      apex unit-test code-coverage






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Adrian Larson

      109k19116249




      109k19116249










      asked yesterday









      Alejandro FloresAlejandro Flores

      455




      455




















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          5














          You have unreachable statements, and your code is overly complicated. You should remove your use of switch statements entirely.



          I recommend you simplify the logic for getting quarter to something like the below:



          public Integer getQuarterNumber(Integer month)

          return 1 + (Integer)Math.floor((month-1)/3);

          public String getQuarterName(Integer month)

          return 'Q' + getQuarterNumber(month);



          This code should be very easy to cover.




          As for getting the name of the month, I would use standard Datetime formatting and keep this logic out of your own code. Something like below would be very easy to use and cover, and should update based on the running user's language:



          String getMonthName(Integer month)

          return Datetime.newInstance(2000, month, 15, 0, 0, 0).format('MMMM');



          If you want to guarantee the month name is in English, a more classic approach will give you what you want without forcing you to hit every single execution path in your test. Use a Map.



          static final Map<Integer, String> monthNames = new Map<Integer, String>

          1 => 'January',
          2 => 'February',
          // etc
          ;
          public static String getMonthName(Integer month)

          return monthNames.get(month);



          One advantage to using a map over a list here is you do not have to worry about bound checking or exceptions based on invalid input. You will simply get a name of null if you pass in 15 as your month number, for example.






          share|improve this answer

























          • I guess they are not unreachable, but I thought switch statements wouldn't compile without a when else.

            – Adrian Larson
            yesterday











          • Got it. Thanks for your explanation. Should I use Switch for more complex logic evaluations then?

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday











          • Also, I need the month names to be always in english in the format of the code because that is being used for other triggers and other logics. Can that be done with your approach?

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday











          • @AlejandroFlores I would only use switch statement when you can't find an alternative. I'll add a way you can guarantee the month names are in English, but if that is the language on all users in your system it may be moot anyway.

            – Adrian Larson
            yesterday











          • Can you edit the your answer? I'm trying to correct how to get the values of the mapping in your code but for some reason I can't do it, maybe I don't have enough reputation. Initially it was return MonthNames(); but this was not compiling so I changed it to return monthNames.get(month) and works fine. Thanks again.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday



















          4














          The golden rule of unit testing is that you only gain coverage for code that is executed as part of a unit test.



          Looking at your switch statements in both of your helper methods, if your input matches one of the when criteria, you set a value and then immediately return. Those return lines don't just pop you out of the switch, it pops you out of the entire method.



          Thus, if your tests are only providing input that will match one of the when criteria (the "happy path"), you'll never reach those final return lines in your two helper methods.



          No reach = no execution = no coverage.



          Honestly though, all of those return lines inside of your when blocks are only hurting you here. The behavior of switch in Apex is to execute either one or zero blocks inside the switch, and then move on to the next statement.



          If you were to remove the return; line in each of your when blocks, you would reach the final return; at the end of both of your helper methods and you'd get your coverage for that line.



          If you do follow that advice, then you should also add some more error checking (what if month is null? what if it's less than 1? what if it's greater than 12?) as well as test methods to stress those situations.



          Looking at the other answers though, I agree that switch isn't really the best tool for the job here.






          share|improve this answer























          • The reason why I have that final return is because otherwise it wasn't compiling but my understanding was that when a switch block executes the return doesn't pop you out of the entire method but I guess I have to many returns in there. I did this because I saw an example of the Switch and they were doing this but I guess that was a bad practice.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday











          • @AlejandroFlores Can you share the resource that you used as the basis for your code? You may have misinterpreted something, or maybe the resource you found is low-quality and should be avoided.

            – Derek F
            yesterday











          • @AlejandroFlores The reason why Salesforce was complaining was because there were certain paths that could be taken (null integer, or a value outside of [1,12]) where you would not encounter a return statement. If you had added a when else block with a return statement, Salesforce would've been just fine with it. That said, I still think that a single return statement (if there weren't a better alternative to using switch outside of the switch is better practice.

            – Derek F
            yesterday











          • I lost the source between computers, sorry. I'll owe you that one.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday


















          3














          You would need to pass in a null value to the method to reach the "default" value. Since that's not possible, you might consider optimizing your code to return a value in default, which should negate the need for a default return.



          global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
          Switch on Month
          when 1 return 'January';
          when 2 return 'February';
          when 3 return 'March';
          when 4 return 'April';
          when 5 return 'May';
          when 6 return 'June';
          when 7 return 'July';
          when 8 return 'August';
          when 9 return 'September';
          when 10 return 'October';
          when 11 return 'November';
          when else return 'December';





          Switch statements can do what you're doing, but this would be just as efficient:



          static String[] monthNames = new String[] 'January','February','March','April','May','June','July','August','September','October','November','December' ;
          global static string getMonthName(Integer month)
          return monthNames[month-1];






          share|improve this answer






















            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "459"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f254931%2fhow-to-cover-method-return-statement-in-apex-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes








            3 Answers
            3






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            5














            You have unreachable statements, and your code is overly complicated. You should remove your use of switch statements entirely.



            I recommend you simplify the logic for getting quarter to something like the below:



            public Integer getQuarterNumber(Integer month)

            return 1 + (Integer)Math.floor((month-1)/3);

            public String getQuarterName(Integer month)

            return 'Q' + getQuarterNumber(month);



            This code should be very easy to cover.




            As for getting the name of the month, I would use standard Datetime formatting and keep this logic out of your own code. Something like below would be very easy to use and cover, and should update based on the running user's language:



            String getMonthName(Integer month)

            return Datetime.newInstance(2000, month, 15, 0, 0, 0).format('MMMM');



            If you want to guarantee the month name is in English, a more classic approach will give you what you want without forcing you to hit every single execution path in your test. Use a Map.



            static final Map<Integer, String> monthNames = new Map<Integer, String>

            1 => 'January',
            2 => 'February',
            // etc
            ;
            public static String getMonthName(Integer month)

            return monthNames.get(month);



            One advantage to using a map over a list here is you do not have to worry about bound checking or exceptions based on invalid input. You will simply get a name of null if you pass in 15 as your month number, for example.






            share|improve this answer

























            • I guess they are not unreachable, but I thought switch statements wouldn't compile without a when else.

              – Adrian Larson
              yesterday











            • Got it. Thanks for your explanation. Should I use Switch for more complex logic evaluations then?

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • Also, I need the month names to be always in english in the format of the code because that is being used for other triggers and other logics. Can that be done with your approach?

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores I would only use switch statement when you can't find an alternative. I'll add a way you can guarantee the month names are in English, but if that is the language on all users in your system it may be moot anyway.

              – Adrian Larson
              yesterday











            • Can you edit the your answer? I'm trying to correct how to get the values of the mapping in your code but for some reason I can't do it, maybe I don't have enough reputation. Initially it was return MonthNames(); but this was not compiling so I changed it to return monthNames.get(month) and works fine. Thanks again.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday
















            5














            You have unreachable statements, and your code is overly complicated. You should remove your use of switch statements entirely.



            I recommend you simplify the logic for getting quarter to something like the below:



            public Integer getQuarterNumber(Integer month)

            return 1 + (Integer)Math.floor((month-1)/3);

            public String getQuarterName(Integer month)

            return 'Q' + getQuarterNumber(month);



            This code should be very easy to cover.




            As for getting the name of the month, I would use standard Datetime formatting and keep this logic out of your own code. Something like below would be very easy to use and cover, and should update based on the running user's language:



            String getMonthName(Integer month)

            return Datetime.newInstance(2000, month, 15, 0, 0, 0).format('MMMM');



            If you want to guarantee the month name is in English, a more classic approach will give you what you want without forcing you to hit every single execution path in your test. Use a Map.



            static final Map<Integer, String> monthNames = new Map<Integer, String>

            1 => 'January',
            2 => 'February',
            // etc
            ;
            public static String getMonthName(Integer month)

            return monthNames.get(month);



            One advantage to using a map over a list here is you do not have to worry about bound checking or exceptions based on invalid input. You will simply get a name of null if you pass in 15 as your month number, for example.






            share|improve this answer

























            • I guess they are not unreachable, but I thought switch statements wouldn't compile without a when else.

              – Adrian Larson
              yesterday











            • Got it. Thanks for your explanation. Should I use Switch for more complex logic evaluations then?

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • Also, I need the month names to be always in english in the format of the code because that is being used for other triggers and other logics. Can that be done with your approach?

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores I would only use switch statement when you can't find an alternative. I'll add a way you can guarantee the month names are in English, but if that is the language on all users in your system it may be moot anyway.

              – Adrian Larson
              yesterday











            • Can you edit the your answer? I'm trying to correct how to get the values of the mapping in your code but for some reason I can't do it, maybe I don't have enough reputation. Initially it was return MonthNames(); but this was not compiling so I changed it to return monthNames.get(month) and works fine. Thanks again.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday














            5












            5








            5







            You have unreachable statements, and your code is overly complicated. You should remove your use of switch statements entirely.



            I recommend you simplify the logic for getting quarter to something like the below:



            public Integer getQuarterNumber(Integer month)

            return 1 + (Integer)Math.floor((month-1)/3);

            public String getQuarterName(Integer month)

            return 'Q' + getQuarterNumber(month);



            This code should be very easy to cover.




            As for getting the name of the month, I would use standard Datetime formatting and keep this logic out of your own code. Something like below would be very easy to use and cover, and should update based on the running user's language:



            String getMonthName(Integer month)

            return Datetime.newInstance(2000, month, 15, 0, 0, 0).format('MMMM');



            If you want to guarantee the month name is in English, a more classic approach will give you what you want without forcing you to hit every single execution path in your test. Use a Map.



            static final Map<Integer, String> monthNames = new Map<Integer, String>

            1 => 'January',
            2 => 'February',
            // etc
            ;
            public static String getMonthName(Integer month)

            return monthNames.get(month);



            One advantage to using a map over a list here is you do not have to worry about bound checking or exceptions based on invalid input. You will simply get a name of null if you pass in 15 as your month number, for example.






            share|improve this answer















            You have unreachable statements, and your code is overly complicated. You should remove your use of switch statements entirely.



            I recommend you simplify the logic for getting quarter to something like the below:



            public Integer getQuarterNumber(Integer month)

            return 1 + (Integer)Math.floor((month-1)/3);

            public String getQuarterName(Integer month)

            return 'Q' + getQuarterNumber(month);



            This code should be very easy to cover.




            As for getting the name of the month, I would use standard Datetime formatting and keep this logic out of your own code. Something like below would be very easy to use and cover, and should update based on the running user's language:



            String getMonthName(Integer month)

            return Datetime.newInstance(2000, month, 15, 0, 0, 0).format('MMMM');



            If you want to guarantee the month name is in English, a more classic approach will give you what you want without forcing you to hit every single execution path in your test. Use a Map.



            static final Map<Integer, String> monthNames = new Map<Integer, String>

            1 => 'January',
            2 => 'February',
            // etc
            ;
            public static String getMonthName(Integer month)

            return monthNames.get(month);



            One advantage to using a map over a list here is you do not have to worry about bound checking or exceptions based on invalid input. You will simply get a name of null if you pass in 15 as your month number, for example.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited yesterday

























            answered yesterday









            Adrian LarsonAdrian Larson

            109k19116249




            109k19116249












            • I guess they are not unreachable, but I thought switch statements wouldn't compile without a when else.

              – Adrian Larson
              yesterday











            • Got it. Thanks for your explanation. Should I use Switch for more complex logic evaluations then?

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • Also, I need the month names to be always in english in the format of the code because that is being used for other triggers and other logics. Can that be done with your approach?

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores I would only use switch statement when you can't find an alternative. I'll add a way you can guarantee the month names are in English, but if that is the language on all users in your system it may be moot anyway.

              – Adrian Larson
              yesterday











            • Can you edit the your answer? I'm trying to correct how to get the values of the mapping in your code but for some reason I can't do it, maybe I don't have enough reputation. Initially it was return MonthNames(); but this was not compiling so I changed it to return monthNames.get(month) and works fine. Thanks again.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday


















            • I guess they are not unreachable, but I thought switch statements wouldn't compile without a when else.

              – Adrian Larson
              yesterday











            • Got it. Thanks for your explanation. Should I use Switch for more complex logic evaluations then?

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • Also, I need the month names to be always in english in the format of the code because that is being used for other triggers and other logics. Can that be done with your approach?

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores I would only use switch statement when you can't find an alternative. I'll add a way you can guarantee the month names are in English, but if that is the language on all users in your system it may be moot anyway.

              – Adrian Larson
              yesterday











            • Can you edit the your answer? I'm trying to correct how to get the values of the mapping in your code but for some reason I can't do it, maybe I don't have enough reputation. Initially it was return MonthNames(); but this was not compiling so I changed it to return monthNames.get(month) and works fine. Thanks again.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday

















            I guess they are not unreachable, but I thought switch statements wouldn't compile without a when else.

            – Adrian Larson
            yesterday





            I guess they are not unreachable, but I thought switch statements wouldn't compile without a when else.

            – Adrian Larson
            yesterday













            Got it. Thanks for your explanation. Should I use Switch for more complex logic evaluations then?

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday





            Got it. Thanks for your explanation. Should I use Switch for more complex logic evaluations then?

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday













            Also, I need the month names to be always in english in the format of the code because that is being used for other triggers and other logics. Can that be done with your approach?

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday





            Also, I need the month names to be always in english in the format of the code because that is being used for other triggers and other logics. Can that be done with your approach?

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday













            @AlejandroFlores I would only use switch statement when you can't find an alternative. I'll add a way you can guarantee the month names are in English, but if that is the language on all users in your system it may be moot anyway.

            – Adrian Larson
            yesterday





            @AlejandroFlores I would only use switch statement when you can't find an alternative. I'll add a way you can guarantee the month names are in English, but if that is the language on all users in your system it may be moot anyway.

            – Adrian Larson
            yesterday













            Can you edit the your answer? I'm trying to correct how to get the values of the mapping in your code but for some reason I can't do it, maybe I don't have enough reputation. Initially it was return MonthNames(); but this was not compiling so I changed it to return monthNames.get(month) and works fine. Thanks again.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday






            Can you edit the your answer? I'm trying to correct how to get the values of the mapping in your code but for some reason I can't do it, maybe I don't have enough reputation. Initially it was return MonthNames(); but this was not compiling so I changed it to return monthNames.get(month) and works fine. Thanks again.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday














            4














            The golden rule of unit testing is that you only gain coverage for code that is executed as part of a unit test.



            Looking at your switch statements in both of your helper methods, if your input matches one of the when criteria, you set a value and then immediately return. Those return lines don't just pop you out of the switch, it pops you out of the entire method.



            Thus, if your tests are only providing input that will match one of the when criteria (the "happy path"), you'll never reach those final return lines in your two helper methods.



            No reach = no execution = no coverage.



            Honestly though, all of those return lines inside of your when blocks are only hurting you here. The behavior of switch in Apex is to execute either one or zero blocks inside the switch, and then move on to the next statement.



            If you were to remove the return; line in each of your when blocks, you would reach the final return; at the end of both of your helper methods and you'd get your coverage for that line.



            If you do follow that advice, then you should also add some more error checking (what if month is null? what if it's less than 1? what if it's greater than 12?) as well as test methods to stress those situations.



            Looking at the other answers though, I agree that switch isn't really the best tool for the job here.






            share|improve this answer























            • The reason why I have that final return is because otherwise it wasn't compiling but my understanding was that when a switch block executes the return doesn't pop you out of the entire method but I guess I have to many returns in there. I did this because I saw an example of the Switch and they were doing this but I guess that was a bad practice.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores Can you share the resource that you used as the basis for your code? You may have misinterpreted something, or maybe the resource you found is low-quality and should be avoided.

              – Derek F
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores The reason why Salesforce was complaining was because there were certain paths that could be taken (null integer, or a value outside of [1,12]) where you would not encounter a return statement. If you had added a when else block with a return statement, Salesforce would've been just fine with it. That said, I still think that a single return statement (if there weren't a better alternative to using switch outside of the switch is better practice.

              – Derek F
              yesterday











            • I lost the source between computers, sorry. I'll owe you that one.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday















            4














            The golden rule of unit testing is that you only gain coverage for code that is executed as part of a unit test.



            Looking at your switch statements in both of your helper methods, if your input matches one of the when criteria, you set a value and then immediately return. Those return lines don't just pop you out of the switch, it pops you out of the entire method.



            Thus, if your tests are only providing input that will match one of the when criteria (the "happy path"), you'll never reach those final return lines in your two helper methods.



            No reach = no execution = no coverage.



            Honestly though, all of those return lines inside of your when blocks are only hurting you here. The behavior of switch in Apex is to execute either one or zero blocks inside the switch, and then move on to the next statement.



            If you were to remove the return; line in each of your when blocks, you would reach the final return; at the end of both of your helper methods and you'd get your coverage for that line.



            If you do follow that advice, then you should also add some more error checking (what if month is null? what if it's less than 1? what if it's greater than 12?) as well as test methods to stress those situations.



            Looking at the other answers though, I agree that switch isn't really the best tool for the job here.






            share|improve this answer























            • The reason why I have that final return is because otherwise it wasn't compiling but my understanding was that when a switch block executes the return doesn't pop you out of the entire method but I guess I have to many returns in there. I did this because I saw an example of the Switch and they were doing this but I guess that was a bad practice.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores Can you share the resource that you used as the basis for your code? You may have misinterpreted something, or maybe the resource you found is low-quality and should be avoided.

              – Derek F
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores The reason why Salesforce was complaining was because there were certain paths that could be taken (null integer, or a value outside of [1,12]) where you would not encounter a return statement. If you had added a when else block with a return statement, Salesforce would've been just fine with it. That said, I still think that a single return statement (if there weren't a better alternative to using switch outside of the switch is better practice.

              – Derek F
              yesterday











            • I lost the source between computers, sorry. I'll owe you that one.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday













            4












            4








            4







            The golden rule of unit testing is that you only gain coverage for code that is executed as part of a unit test.



            Looking at your switch statements in both of your helper methods, if your input matches one of the when criteria, you set a value and then immediately return. Those return lines don't just pop you out of the switch, it pops you out of the entire method.



            Thus, if your tests are only providing input that will match one of the when criteria (the "happy path"), you'll never reach those final return lines in your two helper methods.



            No reach = no execution = no coverage.



            Honestly though, all of those return lines inside of your when blocks are only hurting you here. The behavior of switch in Apex is to execute either one or zero blocks inside the switch, and then move on to the next statement.



            If you were to remove the return; line in each of your when blocks, you would reach the final return; at the end of both of your helper methods and you'd get your coverage for that line.



            If you do follow that advice, then you should also add some more error checking (what if month is null? what if it's less than 1? what if it's greater than 12?) as well as test methods to stress those situations.



            Looking at the other answers though, I agree that switch isn't really the best tool for the job here.






            share|improve this answer













            The golden rule of unit testing is that you only gain coverage for code that is executed as part of a unit test.



            Looking at your switch statements in both of your helper methods, if your input matches one of the when criteria, you set a value and then immediately return. Those return lines don't just pop you out of the switch, it pops you out of the entire method.



            Thus, if your tests are only providing input that will match one of the when criteria (the "happy path"), you'll never reach those final return lines in your two helper methods.



            No reach = no execution = no coverage.



            Honestly though, all of those return lines inside of your when blocks are only hurting you here. The behavior of switch in Apex is to execute either one or zero blocks inside the switch, and then move on to the next statement.



            If you were to remove the return; line in each of your when blocks, you would reach the final return; at the end of both of your helper methods and you'd get your coverage for that line.



            If you do follow that advice, then you should also add some more error checking (what if month is null? what if it's less than 1? what if it's greater than 12?) as well as test methods to stress those situations.



            Looking at the other answers though, I agree that switch isn't really the best tool for the job here.







            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            Derek FDerek F

            20.6k52253




            20.6k52253












            • The reason why I have that final return is because otherwise it wasn't compiling but my understanding was that when a switch block executes the return doesn't pop you out of the entire method but I guess I have to many returns in there. I did this because I saw an example of the Switch and they were doing this but I guess that was a bad practice.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores Can you share the resource that you used as the basis for your code? You may have misinterpreted something, or maybe the resource you found is low-quality and should be avoided.

              – Derek F
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores The reason why Salesforce was complaining was because there were certain paths that could be taken (null integer, or a value outside of [1,12]) where you would not encounter a return statement. If you had added a when else block with a return statement, Salesforce would've been just fine with it. That said, I still think that a single return statement (if there weren't a better alternative to using switch outside of the switch is better practice.

              – Derek F
              yesterday











            • I lost the source between computers, sorry. I'll owe you that one.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday

















            • The reason why I have that final return is because otherwise it wasn't compiling but my understanding was that when a switch block executes the return doesn't pop you out of the entire method but I guess I have to many returns in there. I did this because I saw an example of the Switch and they were doing this but I guess that was a bad practice.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores Can you share the resource that you used as the basis for your code? You may have misinterpreted something, or maybe the resource you found is low-quality and should be avoided.

              – Derek F
              yesterday











            • @AlejandroFlores The reason why Salesforce was complaining was because there were certain paths that could be taken (null integer, or a value outside of [1,12]) where you would not encounter a return statement. If you had added a when else block with a return statement, Salesforce would've been just fine with it. That said, I still think that a single return statement (if there weren't a better alternative to using switch outside of the switch is better practice.

              – Derek F
              yesterday











            • I lost the source between computers, sorry. I'll owe you that one.

              – Alejandro Flores
              yesterday
















            The reason why I have that final return is because otherwise it wasn't compiling but my understanding was that when a switch block executes the return doesn't pop you out of the entire method but I guess I have to many returns in there. I did this because I saw an example of the Switch and they were doing this but I guess that was a bad practice.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday





            The reason why I have that final return is because otherwise it wasn't compiling but my understanding was that when a switch block executes the return doesn't pop you out of the entire method but I guess I have to many returns in there. I did this because I saw an example of the Switch and they were doing this but I guess that was a bad practice.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday













            @AlejandroFlores Can you share the resource that you used as the basis for your code? You may have misinterpreted something, or maybe the resource you found is low-quality and should be avoided.

            – Derek F
            yesterday





            @AlejandroFlores Can you share the resource that you used as the basis for your code? You may have misinterpreted something, or maybe the resource you found is low-quality and should be avoided.

            – Derek F
            yesterday













            @AlejandroFlores The reason why Salesforce was complaining was because there were certain paths that could be taken (null integer, or a value outside of [1,12]) where you would not encounter a return statement. If you had added a when else block with a return statement, Salesforce would've been just fine with it. That said, I still think that a single return statement (if there weren't a better alternative to using switch outside of the switch is better practice.

            – Derek F
            yesterday





            @AlejandroFlores The reason why Salesforce was complaining was because there were certain paths that could be taken (null integer, or a value outside of [1,12]) where you would not encounter a return statement. If you had added a when else block with a return statement, Salesforce would've been just fine with it. That said, I still think that a single return statement (if there weren't a better alternative to using switch outside of the switch is better practice.

            – Derek F
            yesterday













            I lost the source between computers, sorry. I'll owe you that one.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday





            I lost the source between computers, sorry. I'll owe you that one.

            – Alejandro Flores
            yesterday











            3














            You would need to pass in a null value to the method to reach the "default" value. Since that's not possible, you might consider optimizing your code to return a value in default, which should negate the need for a default return.



            global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
            Switch on Month
            when 1 return 'January';
            when 2 return 'February';
            when 3 return 'March';
            when 4 return 'April';
            when 5 return 'May';
            when 6 return 'June';
            when 7 return 'July';
            when 8 return 'August';
            when 9 return 'September';
            when 10 return 'October';
            when 11 return 'November';
            when else return 'December';





            Switch statements can do what you're doing, but this would be just as efficient:



            static String[] monthNames = new String[] 'January','February','March','April','May','June','July','August','September','October','November','December' ;
            global static string getMonthName(Integer month)
            return monthNames[month-1];






            share|improve this answer



























              3














              You would need to pass in a null value to the method to reach the "default" value. Since that's not possible, you might consider optimizing your code to return a value in default, which should negate the need for a default return.



              global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
              Switch on Month
              when 1 return 'January';
              when 2 return 'February';
              when 3 return 'March';
              when 4 return 'April';
              when 5 return 'May';
              when 6 return 'June';
              when 7 return 'July';
              when 8 return 'August';
              when 9 return 'September';
              when 10 return 'October';
              when 11 return 'November';
              when else return 'December';





              Switch statements can do what you're doing, but this would be just as efficient:



              static String[] monthNames = new String[] 'January','February','March','April','May','June','July','August','September','October','November','December' ;
              global static string getMonthName(Integer month)
              return monthNames[month-1];






              share|improve this answer

























                3












                3








                3







                You would need to pass in a null value to the method to reach the "default" value. Since that's not possible, you might consider optimizing your code to return a value in default, which should negate the need for a default return.



                global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
                Switch on Month
                when 1 return 'January';
                when 2 return 'February';
                when 3 return 'March';
                when 4 return 'April';
                when 5 return 'May';
                when 6 return 'June';
                when 7 return 'July';
                when 8 return 'August';
                when 9 return 'September';
                when 10 return 'October';
                when 11 return 'November';
                when else return 'December';





                Switch statements can do what you're doing, but this would be just as efficient:



                static String[] monthNames = new String[] 'January','February','March','April','May','June','July','August','September','October','November','December' ;
                global static string getMonthName(Integer month)
                return monthNames[month-1];






                share|improve this answer













                You would need to pass in a null value to the method to reach the "default" value. Since that's not possible, you might consider optimizing your code to return a value in default, which should negate the need for a default return.



                global static String getMonthName (Integer Month)
                Switch on Month
                when 1 return 'January';
                when 2 return 'February';
                when 3 return 'March';
                when 4 return 'April';
                when 5 return 'May';
                when 6 return 'June';
                when 7 return 'July';
                when 8 return 'August';
                when 9 return 'September';
                when 10 return 'October';
                when 11 return 'November';
                when else return 'December';





                Switch statements can do what you're doing, but this would be just as efficient:



                static String[] monthNames = new String[] 'January','February','March','April','May','June','July','August','September','October','November','December' ;
                global static string getMonthName(Integer month)
                return monthNames[month-1];







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                sfdcfoxsfdcfox

                261k12207452




                261k12207452



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f254931%2fhow-to-cover-method-return-statement-in-apex-class%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                    대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

                    Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition