Failed to fetch jessie backports repository The Next CEO of Stack OverflowThe repository jessie-backports Release does no longer have a Release fileW: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 151.101.140.204 80]How to work around “Release file expired” problem on a local mirrorI can't use or find the google debian unstable/sid repositoryHow to update Debian kernel to latest in backportsLinux Mint Rebecca - Packages 404 Not Foundapt pinning priority restricted`apt update` failed on Debian LinuxUnable to find expected entry 'main/binary-mipsel/Packages' in Release fileI installed the kernel and some drivers from jessie-backports. Should I leave the backports repo in /etc/apt/sources.list?How to install a package from a repository which is missing some architectures?How to get rid of a PPA?Debian 9 stretch-backports signature couldn't be verified
Extending anchors in TikZ
MessageLevel in QGIS3
How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?
Would this house-rule that treats advantage as a +1 to the roll instead (and disadvantage as -1) and allows them to stack be balanced?
FBX seems to be empty when imported into Blender
Why do we use the plural of movies in this phrase "We went to the movies last night."?
If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
Why do remote companies require working in the US?
Interfacing a button to MCU (and PC) with 50m long cable
Can I equip Skullclamp on a creature I am sacrificing?
Can you replace a racial trait cantrip when leveling up?
Can we say or write : "No, it'sn't"?
Does it take more energy to get to Venus or to Mars?
Written every which way
Sending manuscript to multiple publishers
Would a galaxy be visible from outside, but nearby?
What do "high sea" and "carry" mean in this sentence?
Why do professional authors make "consistency" mistakes? And how to avoid them?
Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?
Workaholic Formal/Informal
What happened in Rome, when the western empire "fell"?
I believe this to be a fraud - hired, then asked to cash check and send cash as Bitcoin
What does convergence in distribution "in the Gromov–Hausdorff" sense mean?
Failed to fetch jessie backports repository
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowThe repository jessie-backports Release does no longer have a Release fileW: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found [IP: 151.101.140.204 80]How to work around “Release file expired” problem on a local mirrorI can't use or find the google debian unstable/sid repositoryHow to update Debian kernel to latest in backportsLinux Mint Rebecca - Packages 404 Not Foundapt pinning priority restricted`apt update` failed on Debian LinuxUnable to find expected entry 'main/binary-mipsel/Packages' in Release fileI installed the kernel and some drivers from jessie-backports. Should I leave the backports repo in /etc/apt/sources.list?How to install a package from a repository which is missing some architectures?How to get rid of a PPA?Debian 9 stretch-backports signature couldn't be verified
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
2 days ago
add a comment |
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
New contributor
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm using a docker image as a base for my own development that adds the jessie backports repository in its Dockerfile and uses that to install a dependency. This image uses the following command to add the repository:
echo "deb http://ftp.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list
The problem is that fetching packages from the backports repository now fails with the following error (this used to work previously):
W: Failed to fetch
http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
W: Failed to fetch
http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages
404 Not Found
I looked on that server, and those paths are indeed not present there.
I tried to figure out on the Debian backports site whether this particular repository should still be available, and I didn't find any indication that this was deprecated or something like that.
Is this a temporary issue with the repository, or is the jessie-backports repository not available anymore? And if this is not a temporary issue, what options do I have to use this or an equivalent repository without upgrading to the newer Debian stable version?
debian repository
debian repository
New contributor
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Mar 26 at 13:59
GAD3R
27.6k1858114
27.6k1858114
New contributor
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Mar 26 at 12:39
user12345user12345
301124
301124
New contributor
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
user12345 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
2 days ago
add a comment |
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
2 days ago
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
2 days ago
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
2 days ago
add a comment |
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt doesn’t support the check-valid-until flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updatesdoesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updatesis no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentaptcommands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.confshould work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main from /etc/apt/sources.list.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
2 days ago
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
2 days ago
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
yesterday
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
yesterday
1
Here is an updated version of yoursedcommand that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
22 hours ago
add a comment |
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]injessie-backports.listas the other answer suggested, i had to add the-oflag when runningapt-updateto get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.listconfiguration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-owhen running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-oflag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
2 days ago
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
protected by Jeff Schaller♦ 2 days ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
4 Answers
4
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt doesn’t support the check-valid-until flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updatesdoesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updatesis no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentaptcommands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.confshould work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt doesn’t support the check-valid-until flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updatesdoesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updatesis no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentaptcommands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.confshould work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt doesn’t support the check-valid-until flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
Wheezy and Jessie were recently removed from the mirror network, so if you want to continue fetching Jessie backports, you need to use archive.debian.org instead:
deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
(Validity checks need to be disabled since the repository is no longer being updated. Jessie’s apt doesn’t support the check-valid-until flag, see inostia’s answer for details, and the configuration summary further down in this answer.)
The jessie-updates repository has been removed: all the updates have been merged with the main repository, and there will be no further non-security updates. Security updates will continue to be provided, on LTS-supported architectures, in the security repository, until June 30, 2020.
Since you’re building a container image, I highly recommend basing it on Debian 9 instead.
To say on Debian 8 (Jessie), your repositories should end up looking like
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian/ jessie main
deb http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb-src http://security.debian.org/ jessie/updates main
deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
deb-src http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main
without the jessie-updates repository, and you’ll need to disable validity checks in /etc/apt/apt.conf:
Acquire::Check-Valid-Until "false";
(which will apply to all repositories).
edited 2 days ago
answered Mar 26 at 12:48
Stephen KittStephen Kitt
178k24406484
178k24406484
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updatesdoesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updatesis no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentaptcommands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.confshould work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.jessie-updatesdoesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still onsecurity.debian.org.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided onsecurity.debian.org, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, sojessie-updatesis no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes forjessie-backports.
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
Have found that subsequentaptcommands also seem to require-o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false(per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.
– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that inapt.confshould work too (see my update).
– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
Thanks, I'll try that. Upgrading Debian is certainly something I will do in the future, it's just not as simple as my dependency has another dependency that is the actual base image that determines the Debian version. Upgrading that needs a a bit more testing.
– user12345
Mar 26 at 12:54
1
1
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.
jessie-updates doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still on security.debian.org.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
Sorry, my answer was perhaps not all that clear; the line I gave was only for backports.
jessie-updates doesn’t exist any more, so you should delete that altogether, and the Jessie security updates are still on security.debian.org.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:15
2
2
@Ian no, security updates are provided on
security.debian.org, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, so jessie-updates is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes for jessie-backports.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
@Ian no, security updates are provided on
security.debian.org, not through backports or updates. There won’t be any more non-LTS stable updates, so jessie-updates is no longer useful on the main mirror network, and there won’t be any more backports either, so the same goes for jessie-backports.– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 15:57
2
2
Have found that subsequent
apt commands also seem to require -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false (per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
Have found that subsequent
apt commands also seem to require -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false (per unix.stackexchange.com/a/45973/186565) in order to avoid the expiration error.– sumitsu
Mar 26 at 21:01
1
1
@sumitsu thanks, setting that in
apt.conf should work too (see my update).– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
@sumitsu thanks, setting that in
apt.conf should work too (see my update).– Stephen Kitt
Mar 26 at 22:39
|
show 9 more comments
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main from /etc/apt/sources.list.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
2 days ago
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
2 days ago
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
yesterday
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
yesterday
1
Here is an updated version of yoursedcommand that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
22 hours ago
add a comment |
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main from /etc/apt/sources.list.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
2 days ago
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
2 days ago
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
yesterday
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
yesterday
1
Here is an updated version of yoursedcommand that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
22 hours ago
add a comment |
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main from /etc/apt/sources.list.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
After trying solutions suggested by @inostia and @Stephen Kitt I was still getting the following error:
W: Failed to fetch http://deb.debian.org/debian/dists/jessie-updates/main/binary-amd64/Packages 404 Not Found
E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
I figured out that it can be solved by removing the line deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main from /etc/apt/sources.list.
I ended up with the following snippet in my Dockerfile:
RUN echo "deb [check-valid-until=no] http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
RUN sed -i '/deb http://deb.debian.org/debian jessie-updates main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
RUN apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
henadzithenadzit
2513
2513
New contributor
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
henadzit is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
2 days ago
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
2 days ago
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
yesterday
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
yesterday
1
Here is an updated version of yoursedcommand that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
22 hours ago
add a comment |
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
2 days ago
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
2 days ago
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
yesterday
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
yesterday
1
Here is an updated version of yoursedcommand that did the trick for me:sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list
– speedplane
22 hours ago
1
1
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
2 days ago
I had the same issue as you did and your snippet worked for me!
– cafemike
2 days ago
1
1
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
2 days ago
I had to teak sed part as In my case docker image (postgres) was using httpredir.debian.org instead of deb.debian.org.
– harrybvp
2 days ago
1
1
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
yesterday
Thank you!!! I've been struggling for two days to fix my Dockerfile after the Debian jessie change, I pasted your snippet in and it's all working again.
– wpjmurray
yesterday
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
yesterday
sorry, but still same issue ....
– user1722245
yesterday
1
1
Here is an updated version of your
sed command that did the trick for me: sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list– speedplane
22 hours ago
Here is an updated version of your
sed command that did the trick for me: sed -i '/deb http://(deb|httpredir).debian.org/debian jessie.* main/d' /etc/apt/sources.list– speedplane
22 hours ago
add a comment |
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]injessie-backports.listas the other answer suggested, i had to add the-oflag when runningapt-updateto get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.listconfiguration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-owhen running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-oflag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
2 days ago
add a comment |
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]injessie-backports.listas the other answer suggested, i had to add the-oflag when runningapt-updateto get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.listconfiguration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-owhen running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-oflag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
2 days ago
add a comment |
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
This happened to me provisioning a Vagrant box that was using Debian "Jessie".
Following Stephen Kitt's answer, switching to archive.debian.org worked for me, but I had to add it to /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list, rather than to /etc/apt/sources.list.
echo "deb http://archive.debian.org/debian jessie-backports main" > /etc/apt/sources.list.d/jessie-backports.list
I then also got a security error running apt-get update.
Following How to work around "Release file expired" problem on a local mirror, this fixed that error:
apt-get -o Acquire::Check-Valid-Until=false update
New contributor
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited 2 days ago
New contributor
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered Mar 26 at 21:38
inostiainostia
1714
1714
New contributor
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
inostia is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]injessie-backports.listas the other answer suggested, i had to add the-oflag when runningapt-updateto get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.listconfiguration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-owhen running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-oflag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
2 days ago
add a comment |
1
it didn't work when i only included[check-valid-until=no]injessie-backports.listas the other answer suggested, i had to add the-oflag when runningapt-updateto get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from*.listconfiguration as it turned out to not work on its own without including-owhen running apt.
– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the-oflag issue if you set it inapt.conf
– inostia
2 days ago
1
1
it didn't work when i only included
[check-valid-until=no] in jessie-backports.list as the other answer suggested, i had to add the -o flag when running apt-update to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from *.list configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including -o when running apt.– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
it didn't work when i only included
[check-valid-until=no] in jessie-backports.list as the other answer suggested, i had to add the -o flag when running apt-update to get it to work for whatever reason. updated answer to exclude it from *.list configuration as it turned out to not work on its own without including -o when running apt.– inostia
Mar 26 at 22:14
1
1
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the
-o flag issue if you set it in apt.conf– inostia
2 days ago
comments in Stephen Kitt's answer suggest that you may be able to get around the
-o flag issue if you set it in apt.conf– inostia
2 days ago
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
For those using NodeJS with older docker image foundations. I had some frozen images that had these older sources for the compilation of extra libs.
Context: if you wanted to install python during a docker build you ran into this issue during a build of the image (within the last 24 hours) as it failed to source dependencies during a docker build.
I tried the archive path recommendations in this post but couldn't get past the 404's. (also coming from the archive.debian.org location as of today)
Solution: I ended up switching to the latest container version of node (which has python libs already pre-installed) that, and updating some libs in the package json (which now also include binary libs that used to want pythyon) made the issue obsolete.
In the end, updating the foundation image for the container stack (node:latest) seemed to be the most straight-forward path to resolution.
Be wary of stale image stacks with binary dependencies included, they'll probably take a while to update the core OS layer.
New contributor
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
answered 2 days ago
Glen C.Glen C.
212
212
New contributor
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Glen C. is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
protected by Jeff Schaller♦ 2 days ago
Thank you for your interest in this question.
Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).
Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?
See also unix.stackexchange.com/questions/2544/…
– user343761
Mar 26 at 18:25
This is essentially the same question as apt-get update is failing in debian on Super User.
– a CVn
2 days ago