Would this custom Sorcerer variant that can only learn any verbal-component-only spell be unbalanced? The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWould this custom prestige class be balanced? (arcane battlesmith that cannot cast)Can Magic Mouth be used to speak the verbal component of a spell?At level up, can a sorcerer learn spells of a level granted by slots he has from any class?How Best to Improve Concentration Saves (or avoid the check all together)?How unbalanced would a feat that allowed access to other spell lists be?Is this custom darkness spell unbalanced?Can I learn sigil sequences for teleportation circles before learning a spell that can use them?What are the impacts of permitting casters to concentrate on 2 spells?Can a Spell Focus or Component Pouch be used with a spell that has costless consumed components?Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?

In the bitcoin scripting language, how can I access other outputs of the transaction? Or how else can I limit how the coins may be spent?

If the heap is initialized for security, then why is the stack uninitialized?

Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"

How to count occurrences of text in a file?

Make solar eclipses exceedingly rare, but still have new moons

Why am I allowed to create multiple unique pointers from a single object?

Example of a Mathematician/Physicist whose Other Publications during their PhD eclipsed their PhD Thesis

sp_blitzCache results Memory grants

Elegant way to replace substring in a regex with optional groups in Python?

If Nick Fury and Coulson already knew about aliens (Kree and Skrull) why did they wait until Thor's appearance to start making weapons?

Do I need to enable Dev Hub in my PROD Org?

What can we do to stop prior company from asking us questions?

What exact does MIB represent in SNMP? How is it different from OID?

Is "for causing autism in X" grammatical?

How do we know the LHC results are robust?

MessageLevel in QGIS3

How do scammers retract money, while you can’t?

What's the best way to handle refactoring a big file?

Can you replace a racial trait cantrip when leveling up?

How did people program for Consoles with multiple CPUs?

Complex fractions

How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?

Is it ever safe to open a suspicious html file (e.g. email attachment)?

Inappropriate reference requests from Journal reviewers



Would this custom Sorcerer variant that can only learn any verbal-component-only spell be unbalanced?



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowWould this custom prestige class be balanced? (arcane battlesmith that cannot cast)Can Magic Mouth be used to speak the verbal component of a spell?At level up, can a sorcerer learn spells of a level granted by slots he has from any class?How Best to Improve Concentration Saves (or avoid the check all together)?How unbalanced would a feat that allowed access to other spell lists be?Is this custom darkness spell unbalanced?Can I learn sigil sequences for teleportation circles before learning a spell that can use them?What are the impacts of permitting casters to concentrate on 2 spells?Can a Spell Focus or Component Pouch be used with a spell that has costless consumed components?Can a sorcerer learn a 5th-level spell early by creating spell slots using the Font of Magic feature?










7












$begingroup$


I recently started reading through the Shannara books by Terry Brooks, and it got me thinking about how the notion of the wishsong would translate into a system like D&D.



My (very) rough idea right now is a sub-class of sorcerer who can learn spells from any school or class as long as that spell uses only verbal components.



I found a pretty good tool on a site that let me filter to get a list of all verbal-only spells. Level-wise, the list looks reasonably well-distributed and has a decent mix of combat and non-combat spells. That said, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of D&D spells and my experiences with the Sorcerer class is limited.



Would these spells be seriously unbalanced when combined with the class features of a sorcerer?



To be clear, taken as a whole, this list will probably still be too limited and will require adding in some additional spells to round it out later. My primary concern is identifying any game-breaking outliers before I start making further changes.



Cantrips: Lightning Lure, Sword Burst, Thaumaturgy, Vicious Mockery
Lvl 1: Cause Fear, Command, Compelled Duel, Dissonant Whispers, Ensnaring Strike, Faerie Fire, Hail of Thorns, Healing Word, Hunter's Mark, Searing Smite, Thunderous Smite, Wrathful Smite, Zephyr Strike
Lvl 2: Blindness/Deafness, Blur, Branding Smite, Earthbind, Knock, Misty Step,
Prayer of Healing, Warding Wind
Lvl 3 Aura of Vitality, Blinding Smite, Crusader's Mantle, Mass Healing Word, Thunder Step
Lvl 4: Aura of Life, Aura of Purity, Dimension Door, Guardian of Faith, Guardian of Nature, Staggering Smite
Lvl 5: Banishing Smite, Circle of Power, Contact Other Plane, Destructive Wave, Far Step, Geas, Immolation
Lvl 6: Otto's Irresistible Dance, Scatter, Word of Recall
Lvl 7: Divine Word, Power Word Pain, Teleport,
Lvl 8: Glibness, Power Word Stun
Lvl 9: Power Word Kill, Time Stop, Wish










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – pbuchheit
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago
















7












$begingroup$


I recently started reading through the Shannara books by Terry Brooks, and it got me thinking about how the notion of the wishsong would translate into a system like D&D.



My (very) rough idea right now is a sub-class of sorcerer who can learn spells from any school or class as long as that spell uses only verbal components.



I found a pretty good tool on a site that let me filter to get a list of all verbal-only spells. Level-wise, the list looks reasonably well-distributed and has a decent mix of combat and non-combat spells. That said, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of D&D spells and my experiences with the Sorcerer class is limited.



Would these spells be seriously unbalanced when combined with the class features of a sorcerer?



To be clear, taken as a whole, this list will probably still be too limited and will require adding in some additional spells to round it out later. My primary concern is identifying any game-breaking outliers before I start making further changes.



Cantrips: Lightning Lure, Sword Burst, Thaumaturgy, Vicious Mockery
Lvl 1: Cause Fear, Command, Compelled Duel, Dissonant Whispers, Ensnaring Strike, Faerie Fire, Hail of Thorns, Healing Word, Hunter's Mark, Searing Smite, Thunderous Smite, Wrathful Smite, Zephyr Strike
Lvl 2: Blindness/Deafness, Blur, Branding Smite, Earthbind, Knock, Misty Step,
Prayer of Healing, Warding Wind
Lvl 3 Aura of Vitality, Blinding Smite, Crusader's Mantle, Mass Healing Word, Thunder Step
Lvl 4: Aura of Life, Aura of Purity, Dimension Door, Guardian of Faith, Guardian of Nature, Staggering Smite
Lvl 5: Banishing Smite, Circle of Power, Contact Other Plane, Destructive Wave, Far Step, Geas, Immolation
Lvl 6: Otto's Irresistible Dance, Scatter, Word of Recall
Lvl 7: Divine Word, Power Word Pain, Teleport,
Lvl 8: Glibness, Power Word Stun
Lvl 9: Power Word Kill, Time Stop, Wish










share|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – pbuchheit
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago














7












7








7





$begingroup$


I recently started reading through the Shannara books by Terry Brooks, and it got me thinking about how the notion of the wishsong would translate into a system like D&D.



My (very) rough idea right now is a sub-class of sorcerer who can learn spells from any school or class as long as that spell uses only verbal components.



I found a pretty good tool on a site that let me filter to get a list of all verbal-only spells. Level-wise, the list looks reasonably well-distributed and has a decent mix of combat and non-combat spells. That said, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of D&D spells and my experiences with the Sorcerer class is limited.



Would these spells be seriously unbalanced when combined with the class features of a sorcerer?



To be clear, taken as a whole, this list will probably still be too limited and will require adding in some additional spells to round it out later. My primary concern is identifying any game-breaking outliers before I start making further changes.



Cantrips: Lightning Lure, Sword Burst, Thaumaturgy, Vicious Mockery
Lvl 1: Cause Fear, Command, Compelled Duel, Dissonant Whispers, Ensnaring Strike, Faerie Fire, Hail of Thorns, Healing Word, Hunter's Mark, Searing Smite, Thunderous Smite, Wrathful Smite, Zephyr Strike
Lvl 2: Blindness/Deafness, Blur, Branding Smite, Earthbind, Knock, Misty Step,
Prayer of Healing, Warding Wind
Lvl 3 Aura of Vitality, Blinding Smite, Crusader's Mantle, Mass Healing Word, Thunder Step
Lvl 4: Aura of Life, Aura of Purity, Dimension Door, Guardian of Faith, Guardian of Nature, Staggering Smite
Lvl 5: Banishing Smite, Circle of Power, Contact Other Plane, Destructive Wave, Far Step, Geas, Immolation
Lvl 6: Otto's Irresistible Dance, Scatter, Word of Recall
Lvl 7: Divine Word, Power Word Pain, Teleport,
Lvl 8: Glibness, Power Word Stun
Lvl 9: Power Word Kill, Time Stop, Wish










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




I recently started reading through the Shannara books by Terry Brooks, and it got me thinking about how the notion of the wishsong would translate into a system like D&D.



My (very) rough idea right now is a sub-class of sorcerer who can learn spells from any school or class as long as that spell uses only verbal components.



I found a pretty good tool on a site that let me filter to get a list of all verbal-only spells. Level-wise, the list looks reasonably well-distributed and has a decent mix of combat and non-combat spells. That said, I don't have an encyclopedic knowledge of D&D spells and my experiences with the Sorcerer class is limited.



Would these spells be seriously unbalanced when combined with the class features of a sorcerer?



To be clear, taken as a whole, this list will probably still be too limited and will require adding in some additional spells to round it out later. My primary concern is identifying any game-breaking outliers before I start making further changes.



Cantrips: Lightning Lure, Sword Burst, Thaumaturgy, Vicious Mockery
Lvl 1: Cause Fear, Command, Compelled Duel, Dissonant Whispers, Ensnaring Strike, Faerie Fire, Hail of Thorns, Healing Word, Hunter's Mark, Searing Smite, Thunderous Smite, Wrathful Smite, Zephyr Strike
Lvl 2: Blindness/Deafness, Blur, Branding Smite, Earthbind, Knock, Misty Step,
Prayer of Healing, Warding Wind
Lvl 3 Aura of Vitality, Blinding Smite, Crusader's Mantle, Mass Healing Word, Thunder Step
Lvl 4: Aura of Life, Aura of Purity, Dimension Door, Guardian of Faith, Guardian of Nature, Staggering Smite
Lvl 5: Banishing Smite, Circle of Power, Contact Other Plane, Destructive Wave, Far Step, Geas, Immolation
Lvl 6: Otto's Irresistible Dance, Scatter, Word of Recall
Lvl 7: Divine Word, Power Word Pain, Teleport,
Lvl 8: Glibness, Power Word Stun
Lvl 9: Power Word Kill, Time Stop, Wish







dnd-5e homebrew balance sorcerer spell-components






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









V2Blast

25.8k588158




25.8k588158










asked 2 days ago









pbuchheitpbuchheit

24627




24627







  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – pbuchheit
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago













  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
    $endgroup$
    – pbuchheit
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
    $endgroup$
    – V2Blast
    2 days ago








4




4




$begingroup$
@ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– pbuchheit
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@ Gandalfmeansme ONLY spells from this list. If it requires a material or somatic component it is not allowed.
$endgroup$
– pbuchheit
2 days ago




2




2




$begingroup$
The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago





$begingroup$
The site that you link to contains a lot of pirated material (material that they do not have a license to show). So, I have removed it from your question since we have a policy of not linking to sites that host such material.
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago





2




2




$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
2 days ago





$begingroup$
@Rubiksmoose: The donjon site doesn't really include non-SRD content, as far as I know; it doesn't have any of the spell descriptions, so it's only the kind of general info about spells that's visible on D&D Beyond without owning the content.
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
2 days ago











5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















10












$begingroup$

This is a significant weakness for the subclass



This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



  • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

  • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

  • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

  • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

  • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

  • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

  • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

  • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

  • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

  • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



Paladin spells



One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    6












    $begingroup$

    One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



    This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



    Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



    As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



    Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      2 days ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
      $endgroup$
      – David Coffron
      2 days ago










    • $begingroup$
      FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
      $endgroup$
      – KorvinStarmast
      2 days ago






    • 1




      $begingroup$
      @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
      $endgroup$
      – David Coffron
      2 days ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
      $endgroup$
      – Matt Rick
      2 days ago


















    2












    $begingroup$

    It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



    Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

    They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



    I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



    My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      1












      $begingroup$

      The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



      The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



      On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



      Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.






      share|improve this answer









      $endgroup$




















        1












        $begingroup$

        Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



        The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



        Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



        As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



        However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



        Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



        The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



        If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



        What do You Want Theme-wise?



        It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$













          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "122"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          noCode: true, onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144038%2fwould-this-custom-sorcerer-variant-that-can-only-learn-any-verbal-component-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes








          5 Answers
          5






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          10












          $begingroup$

          This is a significant weakness for the subclass



          This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



          • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

          • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

          • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

          • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

          • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

          • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

          • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

          • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

          • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

          • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

          Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



          Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



          Paladin spells



          One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



          Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$

















            10












            $begingroup$

            This is a significant weakness for the subclass



            This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



            • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

            • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

            • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

            • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

            • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

            • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

            • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

            • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

            • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

            • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

            Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



            Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



            Paladin spells



            One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



            Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$















              10












              10








              10





              $begingroup$

              This is a significant weakness for the subclass



              This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



              • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

              • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

              • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

              • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

              • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

              • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

              • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

              • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

              • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

              • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

              Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



              Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



              Paladin spells



              One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



              Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              This is a significant weakness for the subclass



              This list of spells is extremely limited. If you subtract out the sorcerer spells from the new list and compare it to the default sorcerer list, you are trading...



              • 26 cantrips for 2 new ones

              • 25 1st-level spells for 13 new ones

              • 28 2nd-level spells for 2 new ones

              • 25 3rd-level spells for 4 new ones

              • 13 4th-level spells for 5 new ones

              • 16 5th-level spells for 5 new ones

              • 15 6th-level spells for 2 new ones

              • 9 7th-level spells for 1 new one

              • 5 8th-level spells for 1 new one

              • 6 9th level spells for 0 new ones

              Your spell selection will be extremely limited as a result of this feature. There would have to be sizable compensation in the rest of the subclass features to account for this drastic reduction in versatility.



              Another problem is that over the course of a sorcerer's adventuring life, they gain 6 cantrips while your subclass only has access to 4. I'm not sure how you would resolve this, but the subclass should probably account for this disparity.



              Paladin spells



              One possible redeeming factor is the availability of a handful of high-level paladin spells such as staggering smite and banishing smite. These spells are usually only available to paladins of level 13 (for the 4th level ones) and level 17 (for the 5th level ones), but would come online much sooner for your subclass. Usually the only way to get access to these spells earlier is through the bard's Magical Secrets feature.



              Bards will get access to at most six of these over the course of their adventuring career (but reasonably only two as the other four could be used for much more powerful options at higher levels), while your sorcerer subclass gets access to all of them. Overall though, I doubt this makes up for the loss of so many spell options.







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 2 days ago

























              answered 2 days ago









              David CoffronDavid Coffron

              38.7k3134275




              38.7k3134275























                  6












                  $begingroup$

                  One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



                  This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



                  Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



                  As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



                  Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Matt Rick
                    2 days ago















                  6












                  $begingroup$

                  One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



                  This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



                  Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



                  As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



                  Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$












                  • $begingroup$
                    are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Matt Rick
                    2 days ago













                  6












                  6








                  6





                  $begingroup$

                  One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



                  This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



                  Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



                  As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



                  Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  One issue you're likely to run into with this design, is that the list of spells with only verbal components is extremely limited. For example, there are two cantrips in the Player's Handbook with only verbal components, Xanathar's Guide to Everything has none, and the Sword Coast Adventurer's Guide has two more.



                  This would be problematic for a sorcerer, in that they will never be able to have more cantrips than they start with at level 1 (4 cantrips).



                  Outside of cantrips, the total list of spells is still very small and it only gets worse at higher level (there are a total of 11 spells level 6-9 that only have verbal components).



                  As noted below, this is basically a weaker version of a Divine Soul Sorcerer, but with access to several Ranger and Paladin exclusive spells. Those classes are half casters, so your sorcerer gets access to spells that would usually only be available to higher level spells. That said, none of them are particularly powerful (Swiftquiver, for example, isn't present).



                  Overall, I'd say this class is a less powerful version of arguably the best Sorcerer subclass. The sorcerer is generally acknowledged to be underpowered, so I'd guess this would be relatively underpowered.







                  share|improve this answer














                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 2 days ago

























                  answered 2 days ago









                  Matt RickMatt Rick

                  1,250615




                  1,250615











                  • $begingroup$
                    are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Matt Rick
                    2 days ago
















                  • $begingroup$
                    are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    2 days ago










                  • $begingroup$
                    FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                    $endgroup$
                    – KorvinStarmast
                    2 days ago






                  • 1




                    $begingroup$
                    @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                    $endgroup$
                    – David Coffron
                    2 days ago






                  • 2




                    $begingroup$
                    @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                    $endgroup$
                    – Matt Rick
                    2 days ago















                  $begingroup$
                  are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                  $endgroup$
                  – KorvinStarmast
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  are you saying that it can't be overpowered due to that limitation?
                  $endgroup$
                  – KorvinStarmast
                  2 days ago




                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                  $endgroup$
                  – David Coffron
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  Or are you saying that is is underpowered. In short, what is your conclusion?
                  $endgroup$
                  – David Coffron
                  2 days ago












                  $begingroup$
                  FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                  $endgroup$
                  – KorvinStarmast
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  FWIW, as I review the spell list it looks like a variation on the Divine Soul sorc.
                  $endgroup$
                  – KorvinStarmast
                  2 days ago




                  1




                  1




                  $begingroup$
                  @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                  $endgroup$
                  – David Coffron
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  @András sounds like part of answer; I was asking a clarifying question of the OP.
                  $endgroup$
                  – David Coffron
                  2 days ago




                  2




                  2




                  $begingroup$
                  @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Matt Rick
                  2 days ago




                  $begingroup$
                  @pbuchheit I would carefully evaluate the paladin exclusive spells, especially the lvl 4 and 5 ones. Those are usually only available to high level characters, due to paladins being half casters.
                  $endgroup$
                  – Matt Rick
                  2 days ago











                  2












                  $begingroup$

                  It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



                  Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

                  They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



                  I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



                  My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.






                  share|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$

















                    2












                    $begingroup$

                    It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



                    Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

                    They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



                    I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



                    My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.






                    share|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$















                      2












                      2








                      2





                      $begingroup$

                      It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



                      Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

                      They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



                      I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



                      My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.






                      share|improve this answer











                      $endgroup$



                      It is still weak even if you add these above the usual Sorcerer list



                      Divine Soul Sorcerers can learn spells from the Sorcerer and Cleric list.

                      They also get 2d4 per short rest to an attack or save, and empowered healing and wings and half their hit points for a bonus action.



                      I am comparing to the arguably best Sorcerer origin, but as long as it is weaker than the current best, it cannot be overpowered.



                      My recommendation is to use Divine Soul as a template, so add these spells, and some other features for levels 1, 6, 14 and 18.







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 2 days ago









                      V2Blast

                      25.8k588158




                      25.8k588158










                      answered 2 days ago









                      AndrásAndrás

                      29.3k15112208




                      29.3k15112208





















                          1












                          $begingroup$

                          The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



                          The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



                          On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



                          Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.






                          share|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$

















                            1












                            $begingroup$

                            The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



                            The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



                            On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



                            Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.






                            share|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$















                              1












                              1








                              1





                              $begingroup$

                              The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



                              The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



                              On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



                              Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.






                              share|improve this answer









                              $endgroup$



                              The spells are deeply restricted, but it doesn't have to be this stark.



                              The size of the cantrip list alone is an issue. The fact that many of these effects are not amazing for the sorcerer is another. Many of them, for example, strognly encourage melee combat - not an area that the sorceror particularly shines in. By contrast, you're missing almost all of the blasting spells that are the default sorceror's bread and butter.



                              On the other hand, you do have class features to play with. One of the more obvious solutions for this one would be to have a class feature that lets you skip the material components (within a certain budget) and the somatic components, but removes access to the Subtle Spell metamagic or any other form of removing access to verbal components.



                              Of course, you might still want to do some surgery to the spell list after this. In particular, the powers described for the various incarnations of the elfsong aren't necessarily well-aligned with either the Sorceror list or the Verbal-only list. It's going to have to be up to you to decide how far to take that, though.







                              share|improve this answer












                              share|improve this answer



                              share|improve this answer










                              answered 2 days ago









                              Ben BardenBen Barden

                              11.7k12866




                              11.7k12866





















                                  1












                                  $begingroup$

                                  Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



                                  The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



                                  Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



                                  As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



                                  However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



                                  Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



                                  The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



                                  If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



                                  What do You Want Theme-wise?



                                  It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.






                                  share|improve this answer











                                  $endgroup$

















                                    1












                                    $begingroup$

                                    Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



                                    The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



                                    Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



                                    As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



                                    However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



                                    Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



                                    The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



                                    If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



                                    What do You Want Theme-wise?



                                    It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.






                                    share|improve this answer











                                    $endgroup$















                                      1












                                      1








                                      1





                                      $begingroup$

                                      Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



                                      The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



                                      Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



                                      As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



                                      However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



                                      Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



                                      The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



                                      If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



                                      What do You Want Theme-wise?



                                      It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.






                                      share|improve this answer











                                      $endgroup$



                                      Nothing Gamebreaking, but a Problematic Subclass



                                      The good news is there really doesn't seem to be any spells that are overpowered (well, Wish, but Sorcerers get that anyway), so the answer your primary stated question/concern is a simple "no, none of these spells will break your game". Lets move on to the trouble:



                                      Weak, Though This May Not Bother You Thematically



                                      As others have discussed at length, this subclass is getting a very limited selection of spells versus other full spell-casters. Perhaps a larger issue, however, is that they simply don't have a viable list of spells at certain levels. I think a sorcerer without stronger attack cantrips is probably going to be a pretty useless party member for the first couple levels (when they have few spell slots) compared to any other subclass of any class. Meanwhile in the top two tiers they get very few spells at all, which means that spell-wise they will start to become a comparatively even weaker subclass after level ten.



                                      However this is a subclass built strongly around a theme, and thematic strength can offset mechanical weakness to people who care enough about theme. Still having mechanics that bear out the promise of the theme is important even to many people who prefer role-play to roll-play.



                                      Stronger for a Fighter-Caster Subclass or with Some Special Ability to Use Related Spells. But This May Bother You Thematically



                                      The spells they gain are disproportionately Paladin and Ranger spells, and many require a melee attack. This would suggest that if their subclass features involved weapons, armor, an extra attack at level six (like valor bards, sword bards and bladesingers), something to give them semi-competitive hit points, and/or other features to make them useful in non-magical combat then this might be a competitive subclass.



                                      If that is completely off theme (I which suspect it is for a "wishsong" theme) then perhaps they need some other special ability to make a more sorcerer appropriate at-will attack with which various smites and such can be used effectively. It just seems like without some sort of extra ability to take full advantage of smites, hunters mark, etc they are trading way too much for things they can't even get much use from and which probably don't bear out the theme.



                                      What do You Want Theme-wise?



                                      It seems like the real question is not whether these added spells are gamebreaking. Unless there is a particular exploit with metamagic it is hard to see how any RAW spells could be given to a Sorcerer and really "break" the game and most the usual suspects are spells that Sorcerers, or at least Divine Soul Sorcerers, already get. It seems like the real question, and the thing you will have to evaluate the specific spells being given for, is whether they suit the theme you are trying to achieve.







                                      share|improve this answer














                                      share|improve this answer



                                      share|improve this answer








                                      edited 2 days ago









                                      V2Blast

                                      25.8k588158




                                      25.8k588158










                                      answered 2 days ago









                                      Benjamin OlsonBenjamin Olson

                                      5936




                                      5936



























                                          draft saved

                                          draft discarded
















































                                          Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                                          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                          But avoid


                                          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                          draft saved


                                          draft discarded














                                          StackExchange.ready(
                                          function ()
                                          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144038%2fwould-this-custom-sorcerer-variant-that-can-only-learn-any-verbal-component-only%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                          );

                                          Post as a guest















                                          Required, but never shown





















































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown

































                                          Required, but never shown














                                          Required, but never shown












                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Required, but never shown







                                          Popular posts from this blog

                                          getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                                          NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

                                          대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495