Is XSS in canonical link possible?XSS triggered but chrome didn't show popup. What exactly was going on?Stored Cross-Site Scripting Without Parentheses or SpacesXSS using JSF**kA possible router XSS vulnerabilityDoubt Vulnerability XSSLink shortener that virtualizes link for reflected XSS?Is this XSS filter vulnerableIs it possible to perform a XSS attack in the title/subtitle of a webpage?How to stop JS from executing when passed in as a parameter to the URL? (no script tags)XSS using User Agent, Possible?How does OWASP ZAP find Reflected XSS?

Books on the History of math research at European universities

Calculating the number of days between 2 dates in Excel

Is exact Kanji stroke length important?

Science Fiction story where a man invents a machine that can help him watch history unfold

Greatest common substring

What will be the benefits of Brexit?

Resetting two CD4017 counters simultaneously, only one resets

Is the next prime number always the next number divisible by the current prime number, except for any numbers previously divisible by primes?

Female=gender counterpart?

Are taller landing gear bad for aircraft, particulary large airliners?

In Star Trek IV, why did the Bounty go back to a time when whales were already rare?

Who must act to prevent Brexit on March 29th?

What if somebody invests in my application?

Can I create an upright 7-foot × 5-foot wall with the Minor Illusion spell?

Can the harmonic series explain the origin of the major scale?

Can a malicious addon access internet history and such in chrome/firefox?

How to check participants in at events?

Meta programming: Declare a new struct on the fly

Blender - show edges angles “direction”

What is the term when two people sing in harmony, but they aren't singing the same notes?

node command while defining a coordinate in TikZ

How can I raise concerns with a new DM about XP splitting?

Is it okay / does it make sense for another player to join a running game of Munchkin?

The most efficient algorithm to find all possible integer pairs which sum to a given integer



Is XSS in canonical link possible?


XSS triggered but chrome didn't show popup. What exactly was going on?Stored Cross-Site Scripting Without Parentheses or SpacesXSS using JSF**kA possible router XSS vulnerabilityDoubt Vulnerability XSSLink shortener that virtualizes link for reflected XSS?Is this XSS filter vulnerableIs it possible to perform a XSS attack in the title/subtitle of a webpage?How to stop JS from executing when passed in as a parameter to the URL? (no script tags)XSS using User Agent, Possible?How does OWASP ZAP find Reflected XSS?













13















During regular pentesting of my site I discovered that I can close double quotes in a canonical link tag and enter an onerror attribute with a simple javascript alert(1).



enter image description here



It is visible in source code but javascript did not execute.



enter image description here



I also tried with onload event but same result.



Is there a way an attacker can use different payload to execute javascript ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 4





    How about a >?

    – Bergi
    yesterday











  • @Bergi: Could you be more specific ?

    – user101
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    You say that " is not properly escaped in the link tag attribute. Does it also accept > or < without transforming it to an entity reference?

    – Bergi
    19 hours ago











  • @Bergi: No it does not. They are filtered out.

    – user101
    17 hours ago















13















During regular pentesting of my site I discovered that I can close double quotes in a canonical link tag and enter an onerror attribute with a simple javascript alert(1).



enter image description here



It is visible in source code but javascript did not execute.



enter image description here



I also tried with onload event but same result.



Is there a way an attacker can use different payload to execute javascript ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.















  • 4





    How about a >?

    – Bergi
    yesterday











  • @Bergi: Could you be more specific ?

    – user101
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    You say that " is not properly escaped in the link tag attribute. Does it also accept > or < without transforming it to an entity reference?

    – Bergi
    19 hours ago











  • @Bergi: No it does not. They are filtered out.

    – user101
    17 hours ago













13












13








13


1






During regular pentesting of my site I discovered that I can close double quotes in a canonical link tag and enter an onerror attribute with a simple javascript alert(1).



enter image description here



It is visible in source code but javascript did not execute.



enter image description here



I also tried with onload event but same result.



Is there a way an attacker can use different payload to execute javascript ?










share|improve this question









New contributor




user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












During regular pentesting of my site I discovered that I can close double quotes in a canonical link tag and enter an onerror attribute with a simple javascript alert(1).



enter image description here



It is visible in source code but javascript did not execute.



enter image description here



I also tried with onload event but same result.



Is there a way an attacker can use different payload to execute javascript ?







penetration-test xss






share|improve this question









New contributor




user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







user101













New contributor




user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









user101user101

1685




1685




New contributor




user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user101 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 4





    How about a >?

    – Bergi
    yesterday











  • @Bergi: Could you be more specific ?

    – user101
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    You say that " is not properly escaped in the link tag attribute. Does it also accept > or < without transforming it to an entity reference?

    – Bergi
    19 hours ago











  • @Bergi: No it does not. They are filtered out.

    – user101
    17 hours ago












  • 4





    How about a >?

    – Bergi
    yesterday











  • @Bergi: Could you be more specific ?

    – user101
    20 hours ago






  • 1





    You say that " is not properly escaped in the link tag attribute. Does it also accept > or < without transforming it to an entity reference?

    – Bergi
    19 hours ago











  • @Bergi: No it does not. They are filtered out.

    – user101
    17 hours ago







4




4





How about a >?

– Bergi
yesterday





How about a >?

– Bergi
yesterday













@Bergi: Could you be more specific ?

– user101
20 hours ago





@Bergi: Could you be more specific ?

– user101
20 hours ago




1




1





You say that " is not properly escaped in the link tag attribute. Does it also accept > or < without transforming it to an entity reference?

– Bergi
19 hours ago





You say that " is not properly escaped in the link tag attribute. Does it also accept > or < without transforming it to an entity reference?

– Bergi
19 hours ago













@Bergi: No it does not. They are filtered out.

– user101
17 hours ago





@Bergi: No it does not. They are filtered out.

– user101
17 hours ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















12














You can use the same trick as can be used with hidden inputs:




<link rel="canonical" accesskey="X" onclick="alert(1)" />



On Linux, use ALT+SHIFT+X to trigger the payload. IMHO it's enough to report the issue and get it fixed, but it does require some unlikely user interaction.



Other than that, I see no way to exploit this in a modern browser without further code.



While the link tag supports the onload attribute, it only fires when something is successfully loaded, eg:



<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://localhost/test.css" onload="alert(1)">


If your injection were <link href="[user input]" rel="canonical">, then you could exploit it via http://somedomain/somecsssfile.css" rel="stylesheet" onload="alert(1).



The WHATWG spec defines that the first attribute must be used, so it is unlikely that any browser would use the second, so this will not work for your case.



I tried all other event attributes, and none trigger on a normal page load.



This blog post states that this would be exploitable under IE7 and IE8 by injecting a style attribute which then uses an expression to execute JavaScript.



If there is additional JavaScript code that insecurely processes elements, this might also become exploitable (see here for an interesting example).






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks ! You saved my day. For Windows ALT + X works too. This could be chained with clickjacking (if present in website) to execute Javascript.

    – user101
    yesterday











  • How to fix the issue then?

    – Nigel Fds
    yesterday






  • 1





    @NigelFds: By filtering out characters like ", < and >.

    – user101
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    @NigelFds Most - but not all - of the time, you'd want to HTML-encode relevant characters (', ", <, >) when echoing user input. As this is in a URL context, you could also URL-encode the data (see OWASP which also has a good overview of XSS prevention in other contexts, and when encoding of ', ", <, > is not enough).

    – tim
    17 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "162"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);






user101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205975%2fis-xss-in-canonical-link-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









12














You can use the same trick as can be used with hidden inputs:




<link rel="canonical" accesskey="X" onclick="alert(1)" />



On Linux, use ALT+SHIFT+X to trigger the payload. IMHO it's enough to report the issue and get it fixed, but it does require some unlikely user interaction.



Other than that, I see no way to exploit this in a modern browser without further code.



While the link tag supports the onload attribute, it only fires when something is successfully loaded, eg:



<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://localhost/test.css" onload="alert(1)">


If your injection were <link href="[user input]" rel="canonical">, then you could exploit it via http://somedomain/somecsssfile.css" rel="stylesheet" onload="alert(1).



The WHATWG spec defines that the first attribute must be used, so it is unlikely that any browser would use the second, so this will not work for your case.



I tried all other event attributes, and none trigger on a normal page load.



This blog post states that this would be exploitable under IE7 and IE8 by injecting a style attribute which then uses an expression to execute JavaScript.



If there is additional JavaScript code that insecurely processes elements, this might also become exploitable (see here for an interesting example).






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks ! You saved my day. For Windows ALT + X works too. This could be chained with clickjacking (if present in website) to execute Javascript.

    – user101
    yesterday











  • How to fix the issue then?

    – Nigel Fds
    yesterday






  • 1





    @NigelFds: By filtering out characters like ", < and >.

    – user101
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    @NigelFds Most - but not all - of the time, you'd want to HTML-encode relevant characters (', ", <, >) when echoing user input. As this is in a URL context, you could also URL-encode the data (see OWASP which also has a good overview of XSS prevention in other contexts, and when encoding of ', ", <, > is not enough).

    – tim
    17 hours ago
















12














You can use the same trick as can be used with hidden inputs:




<link rel="canonical" accesskey="X" onclick="alert(1)" />



On Linux, use ALT+SHIFT+X to trigger the payload. IMHO it's enough to report the issue and get it fixed, but it does require some unlikely user interaction.



Other than that, I see no way to exploit this in a modern browser without further code.



While the link tag supports the onload attribute, it only fires when something is successfully loaded, eg:



<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://localhost/test.css" onload="alert(1)">


If your injection were <link href="[user input]" rel="canonical">, then you could exploit it via http://somedomain/somecsssfile.css" rel="stylesheet" onload="alert(1).



The WHATWG spec defines that the first attribute must be used, so it is unlikely that any browser would use the second, so this will not work for your case.



I tried all other event attributes, and none trigger on a normal page load.



This blog post states that this would be exploitable under IE7 and IE8 by injecting a style attribute which then uses an expression to execute JavaScript.



If there is additional JavaScript code that insecurely processes elements, this might also become exploitable (see here for an interesting example).






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks ! You saved my day. For Windows ALT + X works too. This could be chained with clickjacking (if present in website) to execute Javascript.

    – user101
    yesterday











  • How to fix the issue then?

    – Nigel Fds
    yesterday






  • 1





    @NigelFds: By filtering out characters like ", < and >.

    – user101
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    @NigelFds Most - but not all - of the time, you'd want to HTML-encode relevant characters (', ", <, >) when echoing user input. As this is in a URL context, you could also URL-encode the data (see OWASP which also has a good overview of XSS prevention in other contexts, and when encoding of ', ", <, > is not enough).

    – tim
    17 hours ago














12












12








12







You can use the same trick as can be used with hidden inputs:




<link rel="canonical" accesskey="X" onclick="alert(1)" />



On Linux, use ALT+SHIFT+X to trigger the payload. IMHO it's enough to report the issue and get it fixed, but it does require some unlikely user interaction.



Other than that, I see no way to exploit this in a modern browser without further code.



While the link tag supports the onload attribute, it only fires when something is successfully loaded, eg:



<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://localhost/test.css" onload="alert(1)">


If your injection were <link href="[user input]" rel="canonical">, then you could exploit it via http://somedomain/somecsssfile.css" rel="stylesheet" onload="alert(1).



The WHATWG spec defines that the first attribute must be used, so it is unlikely that any browser would use the second, so this will not work for your case.



I tried all other event attributes, and none trigger on a normal page load.



This blog post states that this would be exploitable under IE7 and IE8 by injecting a style attribute which then uses an expression to execute JavaScript.



If there is additional JavaScript code that insecurely processes elements, this might also become exploitable (see here for an interesting example).






share|improve this answer















You can use the same trick as can be used with hidden inputs:




<link rel="canonical" accesskey="X" onclick="alert(1)" />



On Linux, use ALT+SHIFT+X to trigger the payload. IMHO it's enough to report the issue and get it fixed, but it does require some unlikely user interaction.



Other than that, I see no way to exploit this in a modern browser without further code.



While the link tag supports the onload attribute, it only fires when something is successfully loaded, eg:



<link rel="stylesheet" href="http://localhost/test.css" onload="alert(1)">


If your injection were <link href="[user input]" rel="canonical">, then you could exploit it via http://somedomain/somecsssfile.css" rel="stylesheet" onload="alert(1).



The WHATWG spec defines that the first attribute must be used, so it is unlikely that any browser would use the second, so this will not work for your case.



I tried all other event attributes, and none trigger on a normal page load.



This blog post states that this would be exploitable under IE7 and IE8 by injecting a style attribute which then uses an expression to execute JavaScript.



If there is additional JavaScript code that insecurely processes elements, this might also become exploitable (see here for an interesting example).







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









timtim

24.2k668102




24.2k668102












  • Thanks ! You saved my day. For Windows ALT + X works too. This could be chained with clickjacking (if present in website) to execute Javascript.

    – user101
    yesterday











  • How to fix the issue then?

    – Nigel Fds
    yesterday






  • 1





    @NigelFds: By filtering out characters like ", < and >.

    – user101
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    @NigelFds Most - but not all - of the time, you'd want to HTML-encode relevant characters (', ", <, >) when echoing user input. As this is in a URL context, you could also URL-encode the data (see OWASP which also has a good overview of XSS prevention in other contexts, and when encoding of ', ", <, > is not enough).

    – tim
    17 hours ago


















  • Thanks ! You saved my day. For Windows ALT + X works too. This could be chained with clickjacking (if present in website) to execute Javascript.

    – user101
    yesterday











  • How to fix the issue then?

    – Nigel Fds
    yesterday






  • 1





    @NigelFds: By filtering out characters like ", < and >.

    – user101
    19 hours ago







  • 1





    @NigelFds Most - but not all - of the time, you'd want to HTML-encode relevant characters (', ", <, >) when echoing user input. As this is in a URL context, you could also URL-encode the data (see OWASP which also has a good overview of XSS prevention in other contexts, and when encoding of ', ", <, > is not enough).

    – tim
    17 hours ago

















Thanks ! You saved my day. For Windows ALT + X works too. This could be chained with clickjacking (if present in website) to execute Javascript.

– user101
yesterday





Thanks ! You saved my day. For Windows ALT + X works too. This could be chained with clickjacking (if present in website) to execute Javascript.

– user101
yesterday













How to fix the issue then?

– Nigel Fds
yesterday





How to fix the issue then?

– Nigel Fds
yesterday




1




1





@NigelFds: By filtering out characters like ", < and >.

– user101
19 hours ago






@NigelFds: By filtering out characters like ", < and >.

– user101
19 hours ago





1




1





@NigelFds Most - but not all - of the time, you'd want to HTML-encode relevant characters (', ", <, >) when echoing user input. As this is in a URL context, you could also URL-encode the data (see OWASP which also has a good overview of XSS prevention in other contexts, and when encoding of ', ", <, > is not enough).

– tim
17 hours ago






@NigelFds Most - but not all - of the time, you'd want to HTML-encode relevant characters (', ", <, >) when echoing user input. As this is in a URL context, you could also URL-encode the data (see OWASP which also has a good overview of XSS prevention in other contexts, and when encoding of ', ", <, > is not enough).

– tim
17 hours ago











user101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









draft saved

draft discarded


















user101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












user101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











user101 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














Thanks for contributing an answer to Information Security Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsecurity.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f205975%2fis-xss-in-canonical-link-possible%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition

Marilyn Monroe Ny fiainany manokana | Jereo koa | Meny fitetezanafanitarana azy.