How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?What are the most common pitfalls awaiting new users?Draw the image of a complex regionFinding residues of multi-dimensional complex functionsMulti-dimensional integral in the complex plane with poles and essential singularityMinkowski sum and product of 2D-regionsFind regions in which the roots of a third degree polynomial are realHow to find function existence borderUsing MaxValue with complex argumentHow to maximize the modulus of a multivariate complex-valued function?Defining 3rd variable for parametricplot3D of two-variable complex functionHow to achieve faster performance on plotting complex valued functionsComplex continuation of an interpolated function

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

How to remove border from elements in the last row?

What are the G forces leaving Earth orbit?

Fair gambler's ruin problem intuition

Why didn't Boeing produce its own regional jet?

How could indestructible materials be used in power generation?

Using "tail" to follow a file without displaying the most recent lines

What do you call someone who asks many questions?

Can someone clarify Hamming's notion of important problems in relation to modern academia?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

One verb to replace 'be a member of' a club

Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?

How to install cross-compiler on Ubuntu 18.04?

Getting extremely large arrows with tikzcd

files created then deleted at every second in tmp directory

Car headlights in a world without electricity

What is the fastest integer factorization to break RSA?

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?

Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

How badly should I try to prevent a user from XSSing themselves?

Why were 5.25" floppy drives cheaper than 8"?

What is required to make GPS signals available indoors?



How to find image of a complex function with given constraints?


What are the most common pitfalls awaiting new users?Draw the image of a complex regionFinding residues of multi-dimensional complex functionsMulti-dimensional integral in the complex plane with poles and essential singularityMinkowski sum and product of 2D-regionsFind regions in which the roots of a third degree polynomial are realHow to find function existence borderUsing MaxValue with complex argumentHow to maximize the modulus of a multivariate complex-valued function?Defining 3rd variable for parametricplot3D of two-variable complex functionHow to achieve faster performance on plotting complex valued functionsComplex continuation of an interpolated function













4












$begingroup$


I am very new to Mathematica. I have started learning it only last month. I would like to graph the image of some complex valued polynomials with some provided conditions. For example: $$ p(z_1,z_2,z_3)=z_1z_2^2 +z_2z_3+z_1z_3,$$ given that $|z_1|=1, |z_2|=2=|z_3|$.










share|improve this question









New contributor




XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
    $endgroup$
    – Alrubaie
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    2 days ago















4












$begingroup$


I am very new to Mathematica. I have started learning it only last month. I would like to graph the image of some complex valued polynomials with some provided conditions. For example: $$ p(z_1,z_2,z_3)=z_1z_2^2 +z_2z_3+z_1z_3,$$ given that $|z_1|=1, |z_2|=2=|z_3|$.










share|improve this question









New contributor




XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
    $endgroup$
    – Alrubaie
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    2 days ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$


I am very new to Mathematica. I have started learning it only last month. I would like to graph the image of some complex valued polynomials with some provided conditions. For example: $$ p(z_1,z_2,z_3)=z_1z_2^2 +z_2z_3+z_1z_3,$$ given that $|z_1|=1, |z_2|=2=|z_3|$.










share|improve this question









New contributor




XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I am very new to Mathematica. I have started learning it only last month. I would like to graph the image of some complex valued polynomials with some provided conditions. For example: $$ p(z_1,z_2,z_3)=z_1z_2^2 +z_2z_3+z_1z_3,$$ given that $|z_1|=1, |z_2|=2=|z_3|$.







graphics complex regions






share|improve this question









New contributor




XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday









Michael E2

150k12203482




150k12203482






New contributor




XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









XYZABCXYZABC

1233




1233




New contributor




XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






XYZABC is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
    $endgroup$
    – Alrubaie
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    2 days ago












  • 1




    $begingroup$
    mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
    $endgroup$
    – Alrubaie
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
    $endgroup$
    – MarcoB
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
    $endgroup$
    – mjw
    2 days ago







1




1




$begingroup$
mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
2 days ago




$begingroup$
mathematica.stackexchange.com/questions/30687/…
$endgroup$
– Alrubaie
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Possible duplicate of Draw the image of a complex region
$endgroup$
– MarcoB
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Do you want to draw the image or do you want a symbolic-algebraic description of the image?
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
2 days ago




$begingroup$
People here generally like users to post code as Mathematica code instead of just images or TeX, so they can copy-paste it. It makes it convenient for them and more likely you will get someone to help you. You may find this meta Q&A helpful
$endgroup$
– Michael E2
2 days ago












$begingroup$
@Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– mjw
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@Michael E2, Great point! I've updated my answer to include the algebraic description as well. Thank you!
$endgroup$
– mjw
2 days ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:



Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
(* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)

sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
(* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
(*
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
-((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
-((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))

-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
-((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
*)

(* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
(*some u solutions are complex*)
realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];

boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
Simplify[
TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];

ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]


enter image description here



Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
    $endgroup$
    – Henrik Schumacher
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
    $endgroup$
    – XYZABC
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
    $endgroup$
    – J. M. is slightly pensive
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of %. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the % and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
    $endgroup$
    – Michael E2
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
    $endgroup$
    – XYZABC
    yesterday



















3












$begingroup$

By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!



 p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
Manipulate[
ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


enter image description here



Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:



 Manipulate[
ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


enter image description here



or



 Manipulate[
FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


enter image description here






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    3












    $begingroup$

    Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.



    z1 = Exp[I r];
    z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
    z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
    expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
    f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];

    R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
    MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
    pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
    triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
    Graphics[
    Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
    FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
    GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
    ,
    Axes -> True
    ]


    enter image description here



    Could be the disk of radius 10...






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
      $endgroup$
      – mjw
      yesterday



















    2












    $begingroup$

    Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.



    poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
    vars = Variables[poly];
    constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
    (* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)

    polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;

    Graphics[
    PointSize[Tiny],
    polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
    Frame -> True]


    enter image description here



    We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries in my other answer.






    share|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      );
      );
      , "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "387"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      XYZABC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194320%2fhow-to-find-image-of-a-complex-function-with-given-constraints%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes








      4 Answers
      4






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:



      Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
      Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
      expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
      (* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)

      sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
      jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
      singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
      singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
      (* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
      solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
      singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
      solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
      (*
      -((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
      -((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
      -((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))

      -((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
      -((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
      -((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
      *)

      (* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
      invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
      sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
      (*some u solutions are complex*)
      realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];

      boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
      Simplify[
      TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
      Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];

      ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]


      enter image description here



      Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
        $endgroup$
        – Henrik Schumacher
        2 days ago











      • $begingroup$
        In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
        $endgroup$
        – XYZABC
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        @XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
        $endgroup$
        – J. M. is slightly pensive
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of %. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the % and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
        $endgroup$
        – Michael E2
        yesterday











      • $begingroup$
        Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
        $endgroup$
        – XYZABC
        yesterday
















      4












      $begingroup$

      On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:



      Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
      Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
      expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
      (* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)

      sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
      jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
      singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
      singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
      (* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
      solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
      singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
      solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
      (*
      -((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
      -((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
      -((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))

      -((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
      -((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
      -((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
      *)

      (* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
      invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
      sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
      (*some u solutions are complex*)
      realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];

      boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
      Simplify[
      TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
      Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];

      ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]


      enter image description here



      Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
        $endgroup$
        – Henrik Schumacher
        2 days ago











      • $begingroup$
        In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
        $endgroup$
        – XYZABC
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        @XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
        $endgroup$
        – J. M. is slightly pensive
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of %. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the % and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
        $endgroup$
        – Michael E2
        yesterday











      • $begingroup$
        Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
        $endgroup$
        – XYZABC
        yesterday














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:



      Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
      Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
      expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
      (* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)

      sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
      jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
      singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
      singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
      (* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
      solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
      singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
      solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
      (*
      -((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
      -((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
      -((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))

      -((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
      -((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
      -((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
      *)

      (* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
      invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
      sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
      (*some u solutions are complex*)
      realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];

      boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
      Simplify[
      TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
      Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];

      ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]


      enter image description here



      Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      On the boundary of the image the Jacobian will be singular:



      Clear[r, s, t, u, v, w];
      Block[z1 = Exp[I r], z2 = 2 Exp[I s], z3 = 2 Exp[I t],
      expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]]]
      (* 4 Cos[r+2 s]+2 Cos[r+t]+4 Cos[s+t], 4 Sin[r+2 s]+2 Sin[r+t]+4 Sin[s+t] *)

      sub = r + t -> u, s + t -> v, r + 2 s -> w;(* see simplified Jacobian *)
      jac = D[expr, r, s, t]; (* Jacobian is 2 x 3 *)
      singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify (* Singular if rows are proportional *)
      singUVW = singRST /. sub // Simplify
      (* Solve cannot solve the system, unless we cut it into bite-size pieces *)
      solv = Solve[singUVW[[;; 2]], v] /. C[1] -> 0;
      singUW = singUVW[[2 ;;]] /. solv // Simplify;
      solu = Solve[#, u] & /@ singUW;
      (*
      -((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[r + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[r + t])) ==
      -((2 Sin[r + 2 s] + Sin[s + t])/(2 Cos[r + 2 s] + Cos[s + t])) ==
      -((Sin[r + t] + 2 Sin[s + t])/(Cos[r + t] + 2 Cos[s + t]))

      -((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
      -((Sin[v] + 2 Sin[w])/(Cos[v] + 2 Cos[w])) ==
      -((Sin[u] + 2 Sin[v])/(Cos[u] + 2 Cos[v]))
      *)

      (* fix sub so that it works on a general expression *)
      invsub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ sub, u, v, w];
      sub = First@Solve[Equal @@@ invsub, r, s, t];
      (*some u solutions are complex*)
      realu = List /@ Cases[Flatten@solu, _?(FreeQ[#, Complex] &)];

      boundaries = PiecewiseExpand /@
      Simplify[
      TrigExpand@Simplify[Simplify[expr /. sub] /. solv] /. realu //
      Flatten[#, 1] &, 0 <= w < 2 Pi];

      ParametricPlot[boundaries // Evaluate, w, 0, 2 Pi]


      enter image description here



      Well, it's only a start, since you have to check in the interior boundaries to see whether they might be holes. But @HenrikSchumacher has done that already.







      share|improve this answer














      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer








      edited yesterday

























      answered 2 days ago









      Michael E2Michael E2

      150k12203482




      150k12203482











      • $begingroup$
        Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
        $endgroup$
        – Henrik Schumacher
        2 days ago











      • $begingroup$
        In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
        $endgroup$
        – XYZABC
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        @XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
        $endgroup$
        – J. M. is slightly pensive
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of %. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the % and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
        $endgroup$
        – Michael E2
        yesterday











      • $begingroup$
        Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
        $endgroup$
        – XYZABC
        yesterday

















      • $begingroup$
        Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
        $endgroup$
        – Henrik Schumacher
        2 days ago











      • $begingroup$
        In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
        $endgroup$
        – XYZABC
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        @XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
        $endgroup$
        – J. M. is slightly pensive
        yesterday










      • $begingroup$
        @XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of %. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the % and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
        $endgroup$
        – Michael E2
        yesterday











      • $begingroup$
        Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
        $endgroup$
        – XYZABC
        yesterday
















      $begingroup$
      Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      2 days ago





      $begingroup$
      Amazing idea to look for critical points of the Jacobian. Good job!
      $endgroup$
      – Henrik Schumacher
      2 days ago













      $begingroup$
      In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
      $endgroup$
      – XYZABC
      2 days ago




      $begingroup$
      In my Mathematica do I have to load some packages as I am not getting any graph?
      $endgroup$
      – XYZABC
      2 days ago












      $begingroup$
      @XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is slightly pensive
      yesterday




      $begingroup$
      @XYZ, did you try running it in a newly opened Mathematica notebook? If it didn't work there, please mention what version number you are using.
      $endgroup$
      – J. M. is slightly pensive
      yesterday












      $begingroup$
      @XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of %. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the % and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael E2
      yesterday





      $begingroup$
      @XYZABC It seems there may have been two problems. Copying and pasting from the site to M messed up some newlines, which changed the meaning of %. The other was that I added a line but put it in out of order in the edit. I've removed all the % and replaced them with variables. It should be fixed now.
      $endgroup$
      – Michael E2
      yesterday













      $begingroup$
      Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
      $endgroup$
      – XYZABC
      yesterday





      $begingroup$
      Could you please explain me the code singRST = Equal @@ Divide @@ jac // Simplify Or maybe give me some reference so that I can go through it.
      $endgroup$
      – XYZABC
      yesterday












      3












      $begingroup$

      By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!



       p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
      q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
      p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
      Manipulate[
      ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
      Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
      Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
      a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
      c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


      enter image description here



      Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:



       Manipulate[
      ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
      a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
      c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


      enter image description here



      or



       Manipulate[
      FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
      2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


      enter image description here






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$

















        3












        $begingroup$

        By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!



         p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
        q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
        p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
        Manipulate[
        ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
        Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
        Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
        a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
        c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


        enter image description here



        Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:



         Manipulate[
        ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
        a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
        c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


        enter image description here



        or



         Manipulate[
        FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
        2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


        enter image description here






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$















          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!



           p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
          q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
          p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
          Manipulate[
          ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
          Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
          Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
          a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
          c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


          enter image description here



          Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:



           Manipulate[
          ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
          a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
          c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


          enter image description here



          or



           Manipulate[
          FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
          2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          By letting $z_1,z_2,z_3$ trace out circles, we can see some beautiful curves that live within that blob!



           p[z1_, z2_, z3_] := z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
          q[t_][a1_, a2_, b1_, b2_, c1_, c2_] :=
          p[Exp[ I (a1 t + a2)], 2 Exp[ I (b1 t + b2)], 2 Exp[ I (c1 t + c2)]];
          Manipulate[
          ParametricPlot[Re[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
          Im[q[ t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], t, 0, 2 [Pi],
          Axes -> False, Frame -> True, PlotRange -> -12, 12,-12, 12],
          a1, -5, 5,a2, 0, 2 [Pi],b1, -5, 5,b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
          c1, -5, 5,c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


          enter image description here



          Here is a look at the analytical form of these curves:



           Manipulate[
          ComplexExpand@ReIm[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]],
          a1, -5, 5, a2, 0, 2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi],
          c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


          enter image description here



          or



           Manipulate[
          FullSimplify[q[t][a1, a2, b1, b2, c1, c2]], a1, -5, 5, a2, 0,
          2 [Pi], b1, -5, 5, b2, 0, 2 [Pi], c1, -5, 5, c2, 0, 2 [Pi]]


          enter image description here







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 2 days ago

























          answered 2 days ago









          mjwmjw

          1,24210




          1,24210





















              3












              $begingroup$

              Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.



              z1 = Exp[I r];
              z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
              z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
              expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
              f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];

              R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
              MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
              pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
              triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
              Graphics[
              Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
              FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
              GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
              ,
              Axes -> True
              ]


              enter image description here



              Could be the disk of radius 10...






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
                $endgroup$
                – mjw
                yesterday
















              3












              $begingroup$

              Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.



              z1 = Exp[I r];
              z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
              z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
              expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
              f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];

              R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
              MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
              pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
              triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
              Graphics[
              Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
              FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
              GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
              ,
              Axes -> True
              ]


              enter image description here



              Could be the disk of radius 10...






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$












              • $begingroup$
                The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
                $endgroup$
                – mjw
                yesterday














              3












              3








              3





              $begingroup$

              Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.



              z1 = Exp[I r];
              z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
              z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
              expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
              f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];

              R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
              MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
              pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
              triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
              Graphics[
              Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
              FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
              GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
              ,
              Axes -> True
              ]


              enter image description here



              Could be the disk of radius 10...






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$



              Not very elegant, but this might give you a coarse idea.



              z1 = Exp[I r];
              z2 = 2 Exp[I s];
              z3 = 2 Exp[I t];
              expr = ComplexExpand[ReIm[z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3]];
              f = r, s, t [Function] Evaluate[expr];

              R = DiscretizeRegion[Cuboid[-1, -1, -1 Pi, 1, 1, 1 Pi],
              MaxCellMeasure -> 0.0125];
              pts = f @@@ MeshCoordinates[R];
              triangles = MeshCells[R, 2, "Multicells" -> True][[1]];
              Graphics[
              Red, Disk[0, 0, 10],
              FaceForm[Black], EdgeForm[Thin],
              GraphicsComplex[pts, triangles]
              ,
              Axes -> True
              ]


              enter image description here



              Could be the disk of radius 10...







              share|improve this answer














              share|improve this answer



              share|improve this answer








              edited 2 days ago

























              answered 2 days ago









              Henrik SchumacherHenrik Schumacher

              59.1k582162




              59.1k582162











              • $begingroup$
                The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
                $endgroup$
                – mjw
                yesterday

















              • $begingroup$
                The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
                $endgroup$
                – mjw
                yesterday
















              $begingroup$
              The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
              $endgroup$
              – mjw
              yesterday





              $begingroup$
              The image is clearly a subset of the disk of radius 10. Perhaps somebody could prove that this is the region or show a point that is not included.
              $endgroup$
              – mjw
              yesterday












              2












              $begingroup$

              Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.



              poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
              vars = Variables[poly];
              constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
              (* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)

              polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;

              Graphics[
              PointSize[Tiny],
              polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
              Frame -> True]


              enter image description here



              We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries in my other answer.






              share|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                2












                $begingroup$

                Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.



                poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
                vars = Variables[poly];
                constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
                (* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)

                polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;

                Graphics[
                PointSize[Tiny],
                polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
                Frame -> True]


                enter image description here



                We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries in my other answer.






                share|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.



                  poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
                  vars = Variables[poly];
                  constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
                  (* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)

                  polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;

                  Graphics[
                  PointSize[Tiny],
                  polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
                  Frame -> True]


                  enter image description here



                  We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries in my other answer.






                  share|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  Here's another numerical approach, similar to @Henrik's, but without the mesh overhead. It can be generalized to more variables easily. It requires some manual intervention to code the constraints on the variables.



                  poly = z1 z2^2 + z2 z3 + z1 z3;
                  vars = Variables[poly];
                  constrVars = Thread[vars -> 1, 2, 2 Array[Exp[I #] &@*Slot, Length@vars]]
                  (* z1 -> E^(I #1), z2 -> 2 E^(I #2), z3 -> 2 E^(I #3) *)

                  polyFN = poly /. constrVars // Evaluate // Function;

                  Graphics[
                  PointSize[Tiny],
                  polyFN @@ RandomReal[0, 2 Pi, Length@vars, 5 10^4] // ReIm // Point,
                  Frame -> True]


                  enter image description here



                  We can see ghosts of some of the boundaries in my other answer.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered yesterday









                  Michael E2Michael E2

                  150k12203482




                  150k12203482




















                      XYZABC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      XYZABC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      XYZABC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      XYZABC is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194320%2fhow-to-find-image-of-a-complex-function-with-given-constraints%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                      대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

                      Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition