Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish [on hold]What is the maximum PC carrying weight?How do I deal with players persistently arguing for rules loopholes, even after I've tried to finalise my rulings?Does a Simulacrum-Wish combo affect the original caster?Could a wish spell make someone who is not able to cast the wish spell, able again?What happens when polymorph ends in a demiplane that is too small for the creature?How to practically handle the 33% chance to be unable to cast Wish ever again?Can this Wish effect be dispelled?What happens if an Arcana Cleric makes a Divine Intervention of a stressful Wish?Can you wish for more wishes from an Efreeti bound to service via an Efreeti Bottle?A spell that let's you travel to another setting. Which level would it be?

Different meanings of こわい

Why do I get negative height?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

What Exploit Are These User Agents Trying to Use?

What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?

Fair gambler's ruin problem intuition

Knowledge-based authentication using Domain-driven Design in C#

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to log in to her iPad. Do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Is this draw by repetition?

Send out email when Apex Queueable fails and test it

How to travel to Japan while expressing milk?

Theorists sure want true answers to this!

What is the fastest integer factorization to break RSA?

Does the Cone of Cold spell freeze water?

how do we prove that a sum of two periods is still a period?

What does the same-ish mean?

How can a day be of 24 hours?

What is an equivalently powerful replacement spell for the Yuan-Ti's Suggestion spell?

What is a Samsaran Word™?

In the UK, is it possible to get a referendum by a court decision?

GFCI outlets - can they be repaired? Are they really needed at the end of a circuit?

Rotate ASCII Art by 45 Degrees

Could the museum Saturn V's be refitted for one more flight?



Players Circumventing the limitations of Wish [on hold]


What is the maximum PC carrying weight?How do I deal with players persistently arguing for rules loopholes, even after I've tried to finalise my rulings?Does a Simulacrum-Wish combo affect the original caster?Could a wish spell make someone who is not able to cast the wish spell, able again?What happens when polymorph ends in a demiplane that is too small for the creature?How to practically handle the 33% chance to be unable to cast Wish ever again?Can this Wish effect be dispelled?What happens if an Arcana Cleric makes a Divine Intervention of a stressful Wish?Can you wish for more wishes from an Efreeti bound to service via an Efreeti Bottle?A spell that let's you travel to another setting. Which level would it be?













8












$begingroup$


So I know that Wish is meant to be a really powerful spell, but some of my players from my group (I am the DM) seem to have spent some time into getting around the limitations of Wish. Now, I know that in order for no adverse (other than a mishap) you must replicate a spell of 8th level or lower, with anything else becoming a probability for you to never cast a wish spell again. You could wish for a magical weapon but that would be likely to transport you someplace where the weapon currently resides. I know that the Wish, if making something, must remain within three hundred cubic feet, or you could completely heal 20 creatures, or any number of weird stuff.



Some of my players spent a large amount of time trying to create some wishes so that I cannot twist nor corrupt their wish. Now, I also know that they cannot just wish for something like 45 points of Dexterity, but they are legitimate wishes. One of them ran along the lines of "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration of all (insert monster here, in this case it was the Tarrasque) in this plane of existence with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever.



How would a DM handle such a wish? Furthermore, if players are putting that much time into such a wish, would that even be considered abusing that power?



I realize that they might never cast that spell again due to the 33% chance of never being able to cast it again, but I honestly believe telling them that their spell fails is an absolute last resort. I would prefer if the answers came from experience and not conjuncture.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$



put on hold as primarily opinion-based by doppelgreener 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you looking for a rule that governs such wishes, or for a way to communicate to players that wish may be only partially fulfilled?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Either would be fine, but a way to communicate to the players would be preferable. I also would not say no to a rule if one existed, but I doubt it does.
    $endgroup$
    – Bookwyrm
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Reminder: Our citation guidelines for subjective answers are that solutions should be tried and tested, and answers should be backed up with experience (your own or someone else's) of how it works out in actual practice. Untested solutions of "here, try this, I haven't tried it at all but I'm sure it will work" are not what we're looking for and may be removed.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I've closed this because "how would you handle this?" and "is this an abuse of power?" are both opinion-soliciting questions that don't have a best or correct answer or solution available; any answer would be equally valid. If you want to achieve a specific outcome or goal we can help you do that, but it needs to be stated.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Folks, comments aren't for answers or partial answers to the question, even if it's closed. Comments deleted. See meta: rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6533/…
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    yesterday
















8












$begingroup$


So I know that Wish is meant to be a really powerful spell, but some of my players from my group (I am the DM) seem to have spent some time into getting around the limitations of Wish. Now, I know that in order for no adverse (other than a mishap) you must replicate a spell of 8th level or lower, with anything else becoming a probability for you to never cast a wish spell again. You could wish for a magical weapon but that would be likely to transport you someplace where the weapon currently resides. I know that the Wish, if making something, must remain within three hundred cubic feet, or you could completely heal 20 creatures, or any number of weird stuff.



Some of my players spent a large amount of time trying to create some wishes so that I cannot twist nor corrupt their wish. Now, I also know that they cannot just wish for something like 45 points of Dexterity, but they are legitimate wishes. One of them ran along the lines of "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration of all (insert monster here, in this case it was the Tarrasque) in this plane of existence with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever.



How would a DM handle such a wish? Furthermore, if players are putting that much time into such a wish, would that even be considered abusing that power?



I realize that they might never cast that spell again due to the 33% chance of never being able to cast it again, but I honestly believe telling them that their spell fails is an absolute last resort. I would prefer if the answers came from experience and not conjuncture.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$



put on hold as primarily opinion-based by doppelgreener 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you looking for a rule that governs such wishes, or for a way to communicate to players that wish may be only partially fulfilled?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Either would be fine, but a way to communicate to the players would be preferable. I also would not say no to a rule if one existed, but I doubt it does.
    $endgroup$
    – Bookwyrm
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Reminder: Our citation guidelines for subjective answers are that solutions should be tried and tested, and answers should be backed up with experience (your own or someone else's) of how it works out in actual practice. Untested solutions of "here, try this, I haven't tried it at all but I'm sure it will work" are not what we're looking for and may be removed.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I've closed this because "how would you handle this?" and "is this an abuse of power?" are both opinion-soliciting questions that don't have a best or correct answer or solution available; any answer would be equally valid. If you want to achieve a specific outcome or goal we can help you do that, but it needs to be stated.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Folks, comments aren't for answers or partial answers to the question, even if it's closed. Comments deleted. See meta: rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6533/…
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    yesterday














8












8








8





$begingroup$


So I know that Wish is meant to be a really powerful spell, but some of my players from my group (I am the DM) seem to have spent some time into getting around the limitations of Wish. Now, I know that in order for no adverse (other than a mishap) you must replicate a spell of 8th level or lower, with anything else becoming a probability for you to never cast a wish spell again. You could wish for a magical weapon but that would be likely to transport you someplace where the weapon currently resides. I know that the Wish, if making something, must remain within three hundred cubic feet, or you could completely heal 20 creatures, or any number of weird stuff.



Some of my players spent a large amount of time trying to create some wishes so that I cannot twist nor corrupt their wish. Now, I also know that they cannot just wish for something like 45 points of Dexterity, but they are legitimate wishes. One of them ran along the lines of "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration of all (insert monster here, in this case it was the Tarrasque) in this plane of existence with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever.



How would a DM handle such a wish? Furthermore, if players are putting that much time into such a wish, would that even be considered abusing that power?



I realize that they might never cast that spell again due to the 33% chance of never being able to cast it again, but I honestly believe telling them that their spell fails is an absolute last resort. I would prefer if the answers came from experience and not conjuncture.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




So I know that Wish is meant to be a really powerful spell, but some of my players from my group (I am the DM) seem to have spent some time into getting around the limitations of Wish. Now, I know that in order for no adverse (other than a mishap) you must replicate a spell of 8th level or lower, with anything else becoming a probability for you to never cast a wish spell again. You could wish for a magical weapon but that would be likely to transport you someplace where the weapon currently resides. I know that the Wish, if making something, must remain within three hundred cubic feet, or you could completely heal 20 creatures, or any number of weird stuff.



Some of my players spent a large amount of time trying to create some wishes so that I cannot twist nor corrupt their wish. Now, I also know that they cannot just wish for something like 45 points of Dexterity, but they are legitimate wishes. One of them ran along the lines of "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration of all (insert monster here, in this case it was the Tarrasque) in this plane of existence with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever.



How would a DM handle such a wish? Furthermore, if players are putting that much time into such a wish, would that even be considered abusing that power?



I realize that they might never cast that spell again due to the 33% chance of never being able to cast it again, but I honestly believe telling them that their spell fails is an absolute last resort. I would prefer if the answers came from experience and not conjuncture.







dnd-5e problem-players wish






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









V2Blast

26.1k590159




26.1k590159










asked 2 days ago









BookwyrmBookwyrm

570518




570518




put on hold as primarily opinion-based by doppelgreener 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









put on hold as primarily opinion-based by doppelgreener 2 days ago


Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.









  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you looking for a rule that governs such wishes, or for a way to communicate to players that wish may be only partially fulfilled?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Either would be fine, but a way to communicate to the players would be preferable. I also would not say no to a rule if one existed, but I doubt it does.
    $endgroup$
    – Bookwyrm
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Reminder: Our citation guidelines for subjective answers are that solutions should be tried and tested, and answers should be backed up with experience (your own or someone else's) of how it works out in actual practice. Untested solutions of "here, try this, I haven't tried it at all but I'm sure it will work" are not what we're looking for and may be removed.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I've closed this because "how would you handle this?" and "is this an abuse of power?" are both opinion-soliciting questions that don't have a best or correct answer or solution available; any answer would be equally valid. If you want to achieve a specific outcome or goal we can help you do that, but it needs to be stated.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Folks, comments aren't for answers or partial answers to the question, even if it's closed. Comments deleted. See meta: rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6533/…
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    yesterday













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Are you looking for a rule that governs such wishes, or for a way to communicate to players that wish may be only partially fulfilled?
    $endgroup$
    – Mołot
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Either would be fine, but a way to communicate to the players would be preferable. I also would not say no to a rule if one existed, but I doubt it does.
    $endgroup$
    – Bookwyrm
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Reminder: Our citation guidelines for subjective answers are that solutions should be tried and tested, and answers should be backed up with experience (your own or someone else's) of how it works out in actual practice. Untested solutions of "here, try this, I haven't tried it at all but I'm sure it will work" are not what we're looking for and may be removed.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I've closed this because "how would you handle this?" and "is this an abuse of power?" are both opinion-soliciting questions that don't have a best or correct answer or solution available; any answer would be equally valid. If you want to achieve a specific outcome or goal we can help you do that, but it needs to be stated.
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    2 days ago







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Folks, comments aren't for answers or partial answers to the question, even if it's closed. Comments deleted. See meta: rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6533/…
    $endgroup$
    – doppelgreener
    yesterday








2




2




$begingroup$
Are you looking for a rule that governs such wishes, or for a way to communicate to players that wish may be only partially fulfilled?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Are you looking for a rule that governs such wishes, or for a way to communicate to players that wish may be only partially fulfilled?
$endgroup$
– Mołot
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Either would be fine, but a way to communicate to the players would be preferable. I also would not say no to a rule if one existed, but I doubt it does.
$endgroup$
– Bookwyrm
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Either would be fine, but a way to communicate to the players would be preferable. I also would not say no to a rule if one existed, but I doubt it does.
$endgroup$
– Bookwyrm
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Reminder: Our citation guidelines for subjective answers are that solutions should be tried and tested, and answers should be backed up with experience (your own or someone else's) of how it works out in actual practice. Untested solutions of "here, try this, I haven't tried it at all but I'm sure it will work" are not what we're looking for and may be removed.
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
2 days ago





$begingroup$
Reminder: Our citation guidelines for subjective answers are that solutions should be tried and tested, and answers should be backed up with experience (your own or someone else's) of how it works out in actual practice. Untested solutions of "here, try this, I haven't tried it at all but I'm sure it will work" are not what we're looking for and may be removed.
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
2 days ago





2




2




$begingroup$
I've closed this because "how would you handle this?" and "is this an abuse of power?" are both opinion-soliciting questions that don't have a best or correct answer or solution available; any answer would be equally valid. If you want to achieve a specific outcome or goal we can help you do that, but it needs to be stated.
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
2 days ago





$begingroup$
I've closed this because "how would you handle this?" and "is this an abuse of power?" are both opinion-soliciting questions that don't have a best or correct answer or solution available; any answer would be equally valid. If you want to achieve a specific outcome or goal we can help you do that, but it needs to be stated.
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
2 days ago





1




1




$begingroup$
Folks, comments aren't for answers or partial answers to the question, even if it's closed. Comments deleted. See meta: rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6533/…
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
yesterday





$begingroup$
Folks, comments aren't for answers or partial answers to the question, even if it's closed. Comments deleted. See meta: rpg.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6533/…
$endgroup$
– doppelgreener
yesterday











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















42












$begingroup$

The wish spell says that, if you wish for too much:




the spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence...




If someone says they want their wish "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever", three obvious solutions are:



  • to rule that the spell simply fails

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted (for example to rule that the Tarrasque was injured but not killed)

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted and the part that is not granted is the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part, and then make up some appropriate adverse side effects

You still want to give the character something in exchange for their wish, so my approach is generally to decide how much of of a benefit their wish is worth, and then give them that much benefit, regardless of how much they asked or didn't ask for.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's unclear to me. Can a Wish partially fail? For instance could the "kill all tarrasques" [partially] succeed but the "no consequences whatsoever" fail?
    $endgroup$
    – Harper
    2 days ago






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Of course. The person listening could've just stopped listening after the first part. I do that to my wife plenty of times...
    $endgroup$
    – Nelson
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration..." clicks fingers "Thy wish is granted"
    $endgroup$
    – svavil
    2 days ago






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    The spell says: "the effect you desire might only be partially achieved". I don't think it gets more clear than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan B
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No adverse side effects makes me think of the movie The Butterfly Effect where the protagonist tried getting just that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ling
    yesterday


















1












$begingroup$

You could use worldbuilding to inflict an unforseen consequence on the players that is nothing to do with the wish itself.



For example: It turns out that there is a greater-power level lawful neutral organization in the multiverse of your setting that are dedicated to preventing and punishing the genocidal use of magic against any creature. They target your PCs for death and eternal afterlife imprisonment in a lawful neutral prison plane as retribution for crimes against reality itself. Set the CR of attacks from that organization above what a Tarrasque would have been. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or have it be the case that some greater evil power was trapped in a mountain prison on that plane of existence, and the prison was guarded by Tarrasques. Because the guards were eliminated, the servants of the great evil were able to unleash their master from the prison. Chaos and mayhem ensue. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or do both. Or do something else completely, the Tarrasques all get sent to the abyss, get converted into demons. This allows the demons to overpower the forces of hell and break out into the Prime Material, and now all of reality is under threat by the armies of abyssal Tarrasques under the command of Demogorgon. Whatever. Get creative.



Give the players an out in that the only way they can fix things is to acquire a macguffin and take it to the place of power to rewrite the timeline, undo the wish, and bring back the monsters they destroyed through the misuse of god-level magic.



It checks out because this isn't an adverse side effect of the wish itself. The wish isn't misfiring and causing an adverse effect, so the wish works as described. The world itself just turns out to have an unexpected consequence built in that the players didn't know about.



You're letting the spell through, but using the consequences of that in the world to incentivize the players to undo the effects of the spell.



Only thing I'd consider in terms of overriding the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part would be to take the 33% chance of losing access to the wish spell and just setting that to 100% for a usage of that magnitude, but give it back after they reset the timeline, which seems fair.



I'd also set the wish in such a way that it can't be undone by another wish spell if another party member tries to dig everyone out of trouble that way.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried this at your table? How did it work out?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm really confused by what you are saying when you say that the PC is "misusing" magic. If magic is not for eliminating but huge threats to the players and the world, what is it for? Would the shadowy organizations come after the PC for killing the tarasque with fireball or true polymorph? What is considered proper use of the wish spell by your definition (and how do you support that judgement)?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Not at an epic level: I've only GM'd twice with 5th edition, and three times back in the 3.5 days. None of the groups lasted long enough to get to 9th level spells. I've had this happen at an epic level to me as a player: A member of the party (Wizard) tried to steal Mystra's divine portfolio. GM decided to let it happen, and the player became the new god of magic: But then magic itself started to break down and the whole multiverse began to unravel. We had to reset the timeline to bring Mystra back and set the universe to rights. Was fun and epic stuff, the whole party loved it.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a meta-gaming question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that I think that it's too powerful a use of the spell. As an in-game question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that it's genocide. On both fronts, I think that blocking it is acceptable, but boring and reduces player agency. On the other hand, letting them do it but then having in-world consequences that incentivize the players to undo it feels both more interesting while using player agency to fix the problem of player agency. I like it, and that's how I'd deal with it if I had a high-level table try to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OP's use of wish has similitudes with oots's Familicide spell ; even though not your own experience, it may be a be a good example to support your answer, as the narrative includes unforseen consequences (spoilers here, but you should start here instead if you don't know the comic - and have plenty of time to read it.)
    $endgroup$
    – Bash
    yesterday

















2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









42












$begingroup$

The wish spell says that, if you wish for too much:




the spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence...




If someone says they want their wish "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever", three obvious solutions are:



  • to rule that the spell simply fails

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted (for example to rule that the Tarrasque was injured but not killed)

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted and the part that is not granted is the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part, and then make up some appropriate adverse side effects

You still want to give the character something in exchange for their wish, so my approach is generally to decide how much of of a benefit their wish is worth, and then give them that much benefit, regardless of how much they asked or didn't ask for.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's unclear to me. Can a Wish partially fail? For instance could the "kill all tarrasques" [partially] succeed but the "no consequences whatsoever" fail?
    $endgroup$
    – Harper
    2 days ago






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Of course. The person listening could've just stopped listening after the first part. I do that to my wife plenty of times...
    $endgroup$
    – Nelson
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration..." clicks fingers "Thy wish is granted"
    $endgroup$
    – svavil
    2 days ago






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    The spell says: "the effect you desire might only be partially achieved". I don't think it gets more clear than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan B
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No adverse side effects makes me think of the movie The Butterfly Effect where the protagonist tried getting just that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ling
    yesterday















42












$begingroup$

The wish spell says that, if you wish for too much:




the spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence...




If someone says they want their wish "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever", three obvious solutions are:



  • to rule that the spell simply fails

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted (for example to rule that the Tarrasque was injured but not killed)

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted and the part that is not granted is the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part, and then make up some appropriate adverse side effects

You still want to give the character something in exchange for their wish, so my approach is generally to decide how much of of a benefit their wish is worth, and then give them that much benefit, regardless of how much they asked or didn't ask for.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    It's unclear to me. Can a Wish partially fail? For instance could the "kill all tarrasques" [partially] succeed but the "no consequences whatsoever" fail?
    $endgroup$
    – Harper
    2 days ago






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Of course. The person listening could've just stopped listening after the first part. I do that to my wife plenty of times...
    $endgroup$
    – Nelson
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration..." clicks fingers "Thy wish is granted"
    $endgroup$
    – svavil
    2 days ago






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    The spell says: "the effect you desire might only be partially achieved". I don't think it gets more clear than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan B
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No adverse side effects makes me think of the movie The Butterfly Effect where the protagonist tried getting just that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ling
    yesterday













42












42








42





$begingroup$

The wish spell says that, if you wish for too much:




the spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence...




If someone says they want their wish "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever", three obvious solutions are:



  • to rule that the spell simply fails

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted (for example to rule that the Tarrasque was injured but not killed)

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted and the part that is not granted is the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part, and then make up some appropriate adverse side effects

You still want to give the character something in exchange for their wish, so my approach is generally to decide how much of of a benefit their wish is worth, and then give them that much benefit, regardless of how much they asked or didn't ask for.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$



The wish spell says that, if you wish for too much:




the spell might simply fail, the effect you desire might only be partly achieved, or you might suffer some unforeseen consequence...




If someone says they want their wish "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever", three obvious solutions are:



  • to rule that the spell simply fails

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted (for example to rule that the Tarrasque was injured but not killed)

  • to rule that the wish is only partially granted and the part that is not granted is the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part, and then make up some appropriate adverse side effects

You still want to give the character something in exchange for their wish, so my approach is generally to decide how much of of a benefit their wish is worth, and then give them that much benefit, regardless of how much they asked or didn't ask for.







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 2 days ago

























answered 2 days ago









Dan BDan B

38.9k877148




38.9k877148











  • $begingroup$
    It's unclear to me. Can a Wish partially fail? For instance could the "kill all tarrasques" [partially] succeed but the "no consequences whatsoever" fail?
    $endgroup$
    – Harper
    2 days ago






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Of course. The person listening could've just stopped listening after the first part. I do that to my wife plenty of times...
    $endgroup$
    – Nelson
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration..." clicks fingers "Thy wish is granted"
    $endgroup$
    – svavil
    2 days ago






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    The spell says: "the effect you desire might only be partially achieved". I don't think it gets more clear than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan B
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No adverse side effects makes me think of the movie The Butterfly Effect where the protagonist tried getting just that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ling
    yesterday
















  • $begingroup$
    It's unclear to me. Can a Wish partially fail? For instance could the "kill all tarrasques" [partially] succeed but the "no consequences whatsoever" fail?
    $endgroup$
    – Harper
    2 days ago






  • 7




    $begingroup$
    Of course. The person listening could've just stopped listening after the first part. I do that to my wife plenty of times...
    $endgroup$
    – Nelson
    2 days ago






  • 11




    $begingroup$
    "I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration..." clicks fingers "Thy wish is granted"
    $endgroup$
    – svavil
    2 days ago






  • 10




    $begingroup$
    The spell says: "the effect you desire might only be partially achieved". I don't think it gets more clear than that.
    $endgroup$
    – Dan B
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    No adverse side effects makes me think of the movie The Butterfly Effect where the protagonist tried getting just that.
    $endgroup$
    – Ling
    yesterday















$begingroup$
It's unclear to me. Can a Wish partially fail? For instance could the "kill all tarrasques" [partially] succeed but the "no consequences whatsoever" fail?
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago




$begingroup$
It's unclear to me. Can a Wish partially fail? For instance could the "kill all tarrasques" [partially] succeed but the "no consequences whatsoever" fail?
$endgroup$
– Harper
2 days ago




7




7




$begingroup$
Of course. The person listening could've just stopped listening after the first part. I do that to my wife plenty of times...
$endgroup$
– Nelson
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Of course. The person listening could've just stopped listening after the first part. I do that to my wife plenty of times...
$endgroup$
– Nelson
2 days ago




11




11




$begingroup$
"I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration..." clicks fingers "Thy wish is granted"
$endgroup$
– svavil
2 days ago




$begingroup$
"I wish for the immediate and complete obliteration..." clicks fingers "Thy wish is granted"
$endgroup$
– svavil
2 days ago




10




10




$begingroup$
The spell says: "the effect you desire might only be partially achieved". I don't think it gets more clear than that.
$endgroup$
– Dan B
2 days ago




$begingroup$
The spell says: "the effect you desire might only be partially achieved". I don't think it gets more clear than that.
$endgroup$
– Dan B
2 days ago












$begingroup$
No adverse side effects makes me think of the movie The Butterfly Effect where the protagonist tried getting just that.
$endgroup$
– Ling
yesterday




$begingroup$
No adverse side effects makes me think of the movie The Butterfly Effect where the protagonist tried getting just that.
$endgroup$
– Ling
yesterday













1












$begingroup$

You could use worldbuilding to inflict an unforseen consequence on the players that is nothing to do with the wish itself.



For example: It turns out that there is a greater-power level lawful neutral organization in the multiverse of your setting that are dedicated to preventing and punishing the genocidal use of magic against any creature. They target your PCs for death and eternal afterlife imprisonment in a lawful neutral prison plane as retribution for crimes against reality itself. Set the CR of attacks from that organization above what a Tarrasque would have been. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or have it be the case that some greater evil power was trapped in a mountain prison on that plane of existence, and the prison was guarded by Tarrasques. Because the guards were eliminated, the servants of the great evil were able to unleash their master from the prison. Chaos and mayhem ensue. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or do both. Or do something else completely, the Tarrasques all get sent to the abyss, get converted into demons. This allows the demons to overpower the forces of hell and break out into the Prime Material, and now all of reality is under threat by the armies of abyssal Tarrasques under the command of Demogorgon. Whatever. Get creative.



Give the players an out in that the only way they can fix things is to acquire a macguffin and take it to the place of power to rewrite the timeline, undo the wish, and bring back the monsters they destroyed through the misuse of god-level magic.



It checks out because this isn't an adverse side effect of the wish itself. The wish isn't misfiring and causing an adverse effect, so the wish works as described. The world itself just turns out to have an unexpected consequence built in that the players didn't know about.



You're letting the spell through, but using the consequences of that in the world to incentivize the players to undo the effects of the spell.



Only thing I'd consider in terms of overriding the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part would be to take the 33% chance of losing access to the wish spell and just setting that to 100% for a usage of that magnitude, but give it back after they reset the timeline, which seems fair.



I'd also set the wish in such a way that it can't be undone by another wish spell if another party member tries to dig everyone out of trouble that way.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried this at your table? How did it work out?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm really confused by what you are saying when you say that the PC is "misusing" magic. If magic is not for eliminating but huge threats to the players and the world, what is it for? Would the shadowy organizations come after the PC for killing the tarasque with fireball or true polymorph? What is considered proper use of the wish spell by your definition (and how do you support that judgement)?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Not at an epic level: I've only GM'd twice with 5th edition, and three times back in the 3.5 days. None of the groups lasted long enough to get to 9th level spells. I've had this happen at an epic level to me as a player: A member of the party (Wizard) tried to steal Mystra's divine portfolio. GM decided to let it happen, and the player became the new god of magic: But then magic itself started to break down and the whole multiverse began to unravel. We had to reset the timeline to bring Mystra back and set the universe to rights. Was fun and epic stuff, the whole party loved it.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a meta-gaming question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that I think that it's too powerful a use of the spell. As an in-game question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that it's genocide. On both fronts, I think that blocking it is acceptable, but boring and reduces player agency. On the other hand, letting them do it but then having in-world consequences that incentivize the players to undo it feels both more interesting while using player agency to fix the problem of player agency. I like it, and that's how I'd deal with it if I had a high-level table try to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OP's use of wish has similitudes with oots's Familicide spell ; even though not your own experience, it may be a be a good example to support your answer, as the narrative includes unforseen consequences (spoilers here, but you should start here instead if you don't know the comic - and have plenty of time to read it.)
    $endgroup$
    – Bash
    yesterday















1












$begingroup$

You could use worldbuilding to inflict an unforseen consequence on the players that is nothing to do with the wish itself.



For example: It turns out that there is a greater-power level lawful neutral organization in the multiverse of your setting that are dedicated to preventing and punishing the genocidal use of magic against any creature. They target your PCs for death and eternal afterlife imprisonment in a lawful neutral prison plane as retribution for crimes against reality itself. Set the CR of attacks from that organization above what a Tarrasque would have been. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or have it be the case that some greater evil power was trapped in a mountain prison on that plane of existence, and the prison was guarded by Tarrasques. Because the guards were eliminated, the servants of the great evil were able to unleash their master from the prison. Chaos and mayhem ensue. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or do both. Or do something else completely, the Tarrasques all get sent to the abyss, get converted into demons. This allows the demons to overpower the forces of hell and break out into the Prime Material, and now all of reality is under threat by the armies of abyssal Tarrasques under the command of Demogorgon. Whatever. Get creative.



Give the players an out in that the only way they can fix things is to acquire a macguffin and take it to the place of power to rewrite the timeline, undo the wish, and bring back the monsters they destroyed through the misuse of god-level magic.



It checks out because this isn't an adverse side effect of the wish itself. The wish isn't misfiring and causing an adverse effect, so the wish works as described. The world itself just turns out to have an unexpected consequence built in that the players didn't know about.



You're letting the spell through, but using the consequences of that in the world to incentivize the players to undo the effects of the spell.



Only thing I'd consider in terms of overriding the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part would be to take the 33% chance of losing access to the wish spell and just setting that to 100% for a usage of that magnitude, but give it back after they reset the timeline, which seems fair.



I'd also set the wish in such a way that it can't be undone by another wish spell if another party member tries to dig everyone out of trouble that way.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried this at your table? How did it work out?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm really confused by what you are saying when you say that the PC is "misusing" magic. If magic is not for eliminating but huge threats to the players and the world, what is it for? Would the shadowy organizations come after the PC for killing the tarasque with fireball or true polymorph? What is considered proper use of the wish spell by your definition (and how do you support that judgement)?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Not at an epic level: I've only GM'd twice with 5th edition, and three times back in the 3.5 days. None of the groups lasted long enough to get to 9th level spells. I've had this happen at an epic level to me as a player: A member of the party (Wizard) tried to steal Mystra's divine portfolio. GM decided to let it happen, and the player became the new god of magic: But then magic itself started to break down and the whole multiverse began to unravel. We had to reset the timeline to bring Mystra back and set the universe to rights. Was fun and epic stuff, the whole party loved it.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a meta-gaming question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that I think that it's too powerful a use of the spell. As an in-game question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that it's genocide. On both fronts, I think that blocking it is acceptable, but boring and reduces player agency. On the other hand, letting them do it but then having in-world consequences that incentivize the players to undo it feels both more interesting while using player agency to fix the problem of player agency. I like it, and that's how I'd deal with it if I had a high-level table try to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OP's use of wish has similitudes with oots's Familicide spell ; even though not your own experience, it may be a be a good example to support your answer, as the narrative includes unforseen consequences (spoilers here, but you should start here instead if you don't know the comic - and have plenty of time to read it.)
    $endgroup$
    – Bash
    yesterday













1












1








1





$begingroup$

You could use worldbuilding to inflict an unforseen consequence on the players that is nothing to do with the wish itself.



For example: It turns out that there is a greater-power level lawful neutral organization in the multiverse of your setting that are dedicated to preventing and punishing the genocidal use of magic against any creature. They target your PCs for death and eternal afterlife imprisonment in a lawful neutral prison plane as retribution for crimes against reality itself. Set the CR of attacks from that organization above what a Tarrasque would have been. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or have it be the case that some greater evil power was trapped in a mountain prison on that plane of existence, and the prison was guarded by Tarrasques. Because the guards were eliminated, the servants of the great evil were able to unleash their master from the prison. Chaos and mayhem ensue. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or do both. Or do something else completely, the Tarrasques all get sent to the abyss, get converted into demons. This allows the demons to overpower the forces of hell and break out into the Prime Material, and now all of reality is under threat by the armies of abyssal Tarrasques under the command of Demogorgon. Whatever. Get creative.



Give the players an out in that the only way they can fix things is to acquire a macguffin and take it to the place of power to rewrite the timeline, undo the wish, and bring back the monsters they destroyed through the misuse of god-level magic.



It checks out because this isn't an adverse side effect of the wish itself. The wish isn't misfiring and causing an adverse effect, so the wish works as described. The world itself just turns out to have an unexpected consequence built in that the players didn't know about.



You're letting the spell through, but using the consequences of that in the world to incentivize the players to undo the effects of the spell.



Only thing I'd consider in terms of overriding the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part would be to take the 33% chance of losing access to the wish spell and just setting that to 100% for a usage of that magnitude, but give it back after they reset the timeline, which seems fair.



I'd also set the wish in such a way that it can't be undone by another wish spell if another party member tries to dig everyone out of trouble that way.






share|improve this answer









$endgroup$



You could use worldbuilding to inflict an unforseen consequence on the players that is nothing to do with the wish itself.



For example: It turns out that there is a greater-power level lawful neutral organization in the multiverse of your setting that are dedicated to preventing and punishing the genocidal use of magic against any creature. They target your PCs for death and eternal afterlife imprisonment in a lawful neutral prison plane as retribution for crimes against reality itself. Set the CR of attacks from that organization above what a Tarrasque would have been. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or have it be the case that some greater evil power was trapped in a mountain prison on that plane of existence, and the prison was guarded by Tarrasques. Because the guards were eliminated, the servants of the great evil were able to unleash their master from the prison. Chaos and mayhem ensue. Continue to escalate and just wreck everything the players have achieved.



Or do both. Or do something else completely, the Tarrasques all get sent to the abyss, get converted into demons. This allows the demons to overpower the forces of hell and break out into the Prime Material, and now all of reality is under threat by the armies of abyssal Tarrasques under the command of Demogorgon. Whatever. Get creative.



Give the players an out in that the only way they can fix things is to acquire a macguffin and take it to the place of power to rewrite the timeline, undo the wish, and bring back the monsters they destroyed through the misuse of god-level magic.



It checks out because this isn't an adverse side effect of the wish itself. The wish isn't misfiring and causing an adverse effect, so the wish works as described. The world itself just turns out to have an unexpected consequence built in that the players didn't know about.



You're letting the spell through, but using the consequences of that in the world to incentivize the players to undo the effects of the spell.



Only thing I'd consider in terms of overriding the "with absolutely no adverse side effects whatsoever" part would be to take the 33% chance of losing access to the wish spell and just setting that to 100% for a usage of that magnitude, but give it back after they reset the timeline, which seems fair.



I'd also set the wish in such a way that it can't be undone by another wish spell if another party member tries to dig everyone out of trouble that way.







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









Daniel ScheallerDaniel Schealler

1196




1196







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried this at your table? How did it work out?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm really confused by what you are saying when you say that the PC is "misusing" magic. If magic is not for eliminating but huge threats to the players and the world, what is it for? Would the shadowy organizations come after the PC for killing the tarasque with fireball or true polymorph? What is considered proper use of the wish spell by your definition (and how do you support that judgement)?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Not at an epic level: I've only GM'd twice with 5th edition, and three times back in the 3.5 days. None of the groups lasted long enough to get to 9th level spells. I've had this happen at an epic level to me as a player: A member of the party (Wizard) tried to steal Mystra's divine portfolio. GM decided to let it happen, and the player became the new god of magic: But then magic itself started to break down and the whole multiverse began to unravel. We had to reset the timeline to bring Mystra back and set the universe to rights. Was fun and epic stuff, the whole party loved it.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a meta-gaming question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that I think that it's too powerful a use of the spell. As an in-game question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that it's genocide. On both fronts, I think that blocking it is acceptable, but boring and reduces player agency. On the other hand, letting them do it but then having in-world consequences that incentivize the players to undo it feels both more interesting while using player agency to fix the problem of player agency. I like it, and that's how I'd deal with it if I had a high-level table try to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OP's use of wish has similitudes with oots's Familicide spell ; even though not your own experience, it may be a be a good example to support your answer, as the narrative includes unforseen consequences (spoilers here, but you should start here instead if you don't know the comic - and have plenty of time to read it.)
    $endgroup$
    – Bash
    yesterday












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Have you tried this at your table? How did it work out?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    I'm really confused by what you are saying when you say that the PC is "misusing" magic. If magic is not for eliminating but huge threats to the players and the world, what is it for? Would the shadowy organizations come after the PC for killing the tarasque with fireball or true polymorph? What is considered proper use of the wish spell by your definition (and how do you support that judgement)?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago











  • $begingroup$
    Not at an epic level: I've only GM'd twice with 5th edition, and three times back in the 3.5 days. None of the groups lasted long enough to get to 9th level spells. I've had this happen at an epic level to me as a player: A member of the party (Wizard) tried to steal Mystra's divine portfolio. GM decided to let it happen, and the player became the new god of magic: But then magic itself started to break down and the whole multiverse began to unravel. We had to reset the timeline to bring Mystra back and set the universe to rights. Was fun and epic stuff, the whole party loved it.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a meta-gaming question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that I think that it's too powerful a use of the spell. As an in-game question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that it's genocide. On both fronts, I think that blocking it is acceptable, but boring and reduces player agency. On the other hand, letting them do it but then having in-world consequences that incentivize the players to undo it feels both more interesting while using player agency to fix the problem of player agency. I like it, and that's how I'd deal with it if I had a high-level table try to do this.
    $endgroup$
    – Daniel Schealler
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    OP's use of wish has similitudes with oots's Familicide spell ; even though not your own experience, it may be a be a good example to support your answer, as the narrative includes unforseen consequences (spoilers here, but you should start here instead if you don't know the comic - and have plenty of time to read it.)
    $endgroup$
    – Bash
    yesterday







2




2




$begingroup$
Have you tried this at your table? How did it work out?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Have you tried this at your table? How did it work out?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago




2




2




$begingroup$
I'm really confused by what you are saying when you say that the PC is "misusing" magic. If magic is not for eliminating but huge threats to the players and the world, what is it for? Would the shadowy organizations come after the PC for killing the tarasque with fireball or true polymorph? What is considered proper use of the wish spell by your definition (and how do you support that judgement)?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago





$begingroup$
I'm really confused by what you are saying when you say that the PC is "misusing" magic. If magic is not for eliminating but huge threats to the players and the world, what is it for? Would the shadowy organizations come after the PC for killing the tarasque with fireball or true polymorph? What is considered proper use of the wish spell by your definition (and how do you support that judgement)?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago













$begingroup$
Not at an epic level: I've only GM'd twice with 5th edition, and three times back in the 3.5 days. None of the groups lasted long enough to get to 9th level spells. I've had this happen at an epic level to me as a player: A member of the party (Wizard) tried to steal Mystra's divine portfolio. GM decided to let it happen, and the player became the new god of magic: But then magic itself started to break down and the whole multiverse began to unravel. We had to reset the timeline to bring Mystra back and set the universe to rights. Was fun and epic stuff, the whole party loved it.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schealler
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Not at an epic level: I've only GM'd twice with 5th edition, and three times back in the 3.5 days. None of the groups lasted long enough to get to 9th level spells. I've had this happen at an epic level to me as a player: A member of the party (Wizard) tried to steal Mystra's divine portfolio. GM decided to let it happen, and the player became the new god of magic: But then magic itself started to break down and the whole multiverse began to unravel. We had to reset the timeline to bring Mystra back and set the universe to rights. Was fun and epic stuff, the whole party loved it.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schealler
2 days ago












$begingroup$
As a meta-gaming question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that I think that it's too powerful a use of the spell. As an in-game question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that it's genocide. On both fronts, I think that blocking it is acceptable, but boring and reduces player agency. On the other hand, letting them do it but then having in-world consequences that incentivize the players to undo it feels both more interesting while using player agency to fix the problem of player agency. I like it, and that's how I'd deal with it if I had a high-level table try to do this.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schealler
2 days ago




$begingroup$
As a meta-gaming question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that I think that it's too powerful a use of the spell. As an in-game question, I think it's a 'misuse' in the sense that it's genocide. On both fronts, I think that blocking it is acceptable, but boring and reduces player agency. On the other hand, letting them do it but then having in-world consequences that incentivize the players to undo it feels both more interesting while using player agency to fix the problem of player agency. I like it, and that's how I'd deal with it if I had a high-level table try to do this.
$endgroup$
– Daniel Schealler
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
OP's use of wish has similitudes with oots's Familicide spell ; even though not your own experience, it may be a be a good example to support your answer, as the narrative includes unforseen consequences (spoilers here, but you should start here instead if you don't know the comic - and have plenty of time to read it.)
$endgroup$
– Bash
yesterday




$begingroup$
OP's use of wish has similitudes with oots's Familicide spell ; even though not your own experience, it may be a be a good example to support your answer, as the narrative includes unforseen consequences (spoilers here, but you should start here instead if you don't know the comic - and have plenty of time to read it.)
$endgroup$
– Bash
yesterday



Popular posts from this blog

getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition