Can I set a Ready action to trigger when literally anything happens?Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be?When does a reaction happen if the trigger is movement?Can you ready an action for “immediately before my next turn”?Timing of the Ready action when the trigger is associated with spell casting?Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger?Can you take a readied action in the middle of another character's action?Can the action in a Ready Action be conditional?Could a Ready action happen before a dragon's breath weapon by having the trigger be “targeting someone with it”?Is “when the spellcaster decides to cast a spell at me” a perceivable Ready trigger using the Detect Thoughts spell?Can you Ready two actions using Action SurgeDo you get Extra Attacks when you ready an attack and use it in your own turn?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?

What are the disadvantages of having a left skewed distribution?

Was any UN Security Council vote triple-vetoed?

Client team has low performances and low technical skills: we always fix their work and now they stop collaborate with us. How to solve?

Is it unprofessional to ask if a job posting on GlassDoor is real?

Unable to deploy metadata from Partner Developer scratch org because of extra fields

How can bays and straits be determined in a procedurally generated map?

Paid for article while in US on F-1 visa?

How old can references or sources in a thesis be?

Alternative to sending password over mail?

What does the "remote control" for a QF-4 look like?

Can a Cauchy sequence converge for one metric while not converging for another?

Could an aircraft fly or hover using only jets of compressed air?

"You are your self first supporter", a more proper way to say it

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

Approximately how much travel time was saved by the opening of the Suez Canal in 1869?

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

Modeling an IP Address

Important Resources for Dark Age Civilizations?

Perform and show arithmetic with LuaLaTeX

Theorems that impeded progress

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?

How much RAM could one put in a typical 80386 setup?

Today is the Center

Cross compiling for RPi - error while loading shared libraries



Can I set a Ready action to trigger when literally anything happens?


Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be?When does a reaction happen if the trigger is movement?Can you ready an action for “immediately before my next turn”?Timing of the Ready action when the trigger is associated with spell casting?Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger?Can you take a readied action in the middle of another character's action?Can the action in a Ready Action be conditional?Could a Ready action happen before a dragon's breath weapon by having the trigger be “targeting someone with it”?Is “when the spellcaster decides to cast a spell at me” a perceivable Ready trigger using the Detect Thoughts spell?Can you Ready two actions using Action SurgeDo you get Extra Attacks when you ready an attack and use it in your own turn?How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


The Ready action in the PHB specifies that you can specify what circumstances will trigger it, and that when the trigger occurs, you can take your reaction or ignore the trigger. Further, if the action doesn't occur, you don't do anything. The only written condition on the trigger is that it is a "perceivable circumstance."



It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action? If so, it seems as if the further conditions on the Ready action are unnecessary, and as if you could just always use that trigger rather than specifying a specific condition, but that seems unlikely.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – mxyzplk
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago

















5












$begingroup$


The Ready action in the PHB specifies that you can specify what circumstances will trigger it, and that when the trigger occurs, you can take your reaction or ignore the trigger. Further, if the action doesn't occur, you don't do anything. The only written condition on the trigger is that it is a "perceivable circumstance."



It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action? If so, it seems as if the further conditions on the Ready action are unnecessary, and as if you could just always use that trigger rather than specifying a specific condition, but that seems unlikely.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – mxyzplk
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


The Ready action in the PHB specifies that you can specify what circumstances will trigger it, and that when the trigger occurs, you can take your reaction or ignore the trigger. Further, if the action doesn't occur, you don't do anything. The only written condition on the trigger is that it is a "perceivable circumstance."



It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action? If so, it seems as if the further conditions on the Ready action are unnecessary, and as if you could just always use that trigger rather than specifying a specific condition, but that seems unlikely.










share|improve this question











$endgroup$




The Ready action in the PHB specifies that you can specify what circumstances will trigger it, and that when the trigger occurs, you can take your reaction or ignore the trigger. Further, if the action doesn't occur, you don't do anything. The only written condition on the trigger is that it is a "perceivable circumstance."



It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action? If so, it seems as if the further conditions on the Ready action are unnecessary, and as if you could just always use that trigger rather than specifying a specific condition, but that seems unlikely.







dnd-5e readied-action






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Louis Wasserman

















asked 2 days ago









Louis WassermanLouis Wasserman

35810




35810











  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – mxyzplk
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
    $endgroup$
    – mxyzplk
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
    $endgroup$
    – Rubiksmoose
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– mxyzplk
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.
$endgroup$
– mxyzplk
2 days ago












$begingroup$
Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Related: Does taking the option to ignore a Ready trigger waste it, or let you use it on a later trigger? and How specific does the trigger for a readied action have to be? and How specific does the Action for Ready need to be?
$endgroup$
– Rubiksmoose
2 days ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.






share|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    8












    $begingroup$


    It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




    This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




    When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




    Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



    To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



    Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



    Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



    With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
      $endgroup$
      – Ruther Rendommeleigh
      2 days ago






    • 2




      $begingroup$
      The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
      $endgroup$
      – Ruther Rendommeleigh
      2 days ago







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
      $endgroup$
      – Bloodcinder
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
      $endgroup$
      – Louis Wasserman
      2 days ago











    • $begingroup$
      Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
      $endgroup$
      – mattdm
      2 days ago











    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "122"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144423%2fcan-i-set-a-ready-action-to-trigger-when-literally-anything-happens%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    17












    $begingroup$

    The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



    You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




    Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



    First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




    The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



    Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



    There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



    You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




    When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




    If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.






    share|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      17












      $begingroup$

      The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



      You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




      Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



      First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




      The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



      Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



      There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



      You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




      When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




      If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.






      share|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        17












        17








        17





        $begingroup$

        The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



        You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




        Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



        First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




        The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



        Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



        There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



        You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




        When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




        If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.






        share|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        The perceivable circumstance must be particular.



        You've missed some context from the rules for the Ready action (emphasis mine):




        Sometimes you want to get the jump on a foe or wait for a particular circumstance before you act. To do so, you can take the Ready action on your turn, which lets you act using your reaction before the start of your next turn.



        First, you decide what perceivable circumstance will trigger your reaction. Then, you choose the action you will take in response to that trigger, or you choose to move up to your speed in response to it. Examples include "If the cultist steps on the trapdoor, I'll pull the lever that opens it," and "If the goblin steps next to me, I move away."




        The trigger must be both perceivable and particular. Though "literally anything happening" is technically something you can perceive, it's not particular, given that it would trigger immediately on the same turn you take the Ready action (the world doesn't stop being full of perceptible happenings on your turn). It also doesn't fit the examples given at face value, each of which depends on obvious occurrences.



        Although there's no explicit metric of specificity, the trigger you propose definitely isn't valid. The examples provide a rough estimate for triggers that most DMs should consider reasonable. Aim for the thought process of a real person making a cause-and-effect decision about the world around them.



        There's sometimes a cost to ignoring the trigger.



        You sometimes have to expend a resource just to take the Ready action, even if you end up ignoring the trigger, such as when you Ready to cast using a spell using a spell slot (continued from the passage above, emphasis mine):




        When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger... When you ready a spell, you cast it as normal but hold its energy, which you release with your reaction when the trigger occurs.




        If don't use your reaction to release the spell before the start of your next turn, the spell slot is wasted. There may be other features that have a similar up-front cost when using the Ready action.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago

























        answered 2 days ago









        BloodcinderBloodcinder

        24.1k389144




        24.1k389144























            8












            $begingroup$


            It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




            This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




            When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




            Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



            To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



            Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



            Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



            With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
              $endgroup$
              – Bloodcinder
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
              $endgroup$
              – mattdm
              2 days ago















            8












            $begingroup$


            It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




            This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




            When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




            Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



            To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



            Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



            Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



            With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$








            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
              $endgroup$
              – Bloodcinder
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
              $endgroup$
              – mattdm
              2 days ago













            8












            8








            8





            $begingroup$


            It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




            This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




            When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




            Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



            To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



            Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



            Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



            With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$




            It seems to me that, RAW, you could always use the trigger "If I perceive literally anything happening," and choose to ignore the trigger whenever you don't feel like using the readied action -- effectively triggering whenever you want. Is this a valid condition for the Ready action?




            This might be a valid trigger, depending on your reading of the semantics of "particular circumstance". But it barely matters, because it's a spectacularly useless one. The rule says:




            When the trigger occurs, you can either take your reaction right after the trigger finishes or ignore the trigger.




            Assuming your character has senses and is experiencing the passage of time, this will happen immediately, at which point you will have to decide to take your declared action or not. There is no "reset, and wait until next instance of the trigger".



            To pick a more normal example: if you say "When someone comes through the door, I shoot 'em", and then your buddy comes through the door followed by an orc a second later, you can shoot your buddy or not — but you can't ignore that trigger and then still have the action readied to shoot the orc.



            Your plan is the same, except will go wrong immediately every time.



            Or, in other words, there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar. There is always a cost — you use your action to ready for a circumstance, and if that situation doesn't happen or happens in a way you don't want to act on after all, you get nothing in exchange.



            With your suggested trigger, immediately after your turn is over, you will perceive something, and therefore need to decide right then if you actually want to use your reaction to do the thing you planned. If you don't, the round moves on and you're done. This is equivalent to saying "I might shoot at the target. Yep, I do. That's my turn." or "I might shoot the target. Nope, wait, I decided not to. Skip my turn."







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 2 days ago

























            answered 2 days ago









            mattdmmattdm

            17.5k880130




            17.5k880130







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
              $endgroup$
              – Bloodcinder
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
              $endgroup$
              – mattdm
              2 days ago












            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago






            • 2




              $begingroup$
              The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
              $endgroup$
              – Ruther Rendommeleigh
              2 days ago







            • 1




              $begingroup$
              Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
              $endgroup$
              – Bloodcinder
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
              $endgroup$
              – Louis Wasserman
              2 days ago











            • $begingroup$
              Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
              $endgroup$
              – mattdm
              2 days ago







            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
            $endgroup$
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            Could you clarify why you believe that the trigger can only occur once? The wording of the rule seems ambiguous and I've seen it used either way, e.g. an answer to another question suggested the trigger "a creature moves [5 ft or more]".
            $endgroup$
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            2 days ago




            2




            2




            $begingroup$
            The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
            $endgroup$
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            The example I was thinking of: rpg.stackexchange.com/a/118864/39342 - "It is worth noting that you may ignore any number of triggers but still choose to react on a later trigger as long as it is before the start of your next turn." Looks like Crawford agrees.
            $endgroup$
            – Ruther Rendommeleigh
            2 days ago





            1




            1




            $begingroup$
            Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
            $endgroup$
            – Bloodcinder
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            Your phrase "there is not just sometimes a cost to readying an action, like the use of a spell slot or similar" seems like a direct commentary on my answer and not an intrinsic point of your own answer. I suggest you rephrase in a way that doesn't assume somebody has already read my answer. (For reference, your answer is good and I've up-voted.)
            $endgroup$
            – Bloodcinder
            2 days ago













            $begingroup$
            @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
            $endgroup$
            – Louis Wasserman
            2 days ago





            $begingroup$
            @RutherRendommeleigh's reference to a Crawford answer that directly contradicts this post's interpretation is convincing. That sure sounds like a ruling that you absolutely do get to wait for the next occurrence of the trigger.
            $endgroup$
            – Louis Wasserman
            2 days ago













            $begingroup$
            Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
            $endgroup$
            – mattdm
            2 days ago




            $begingroup$
            Not very convincing to me as a) it does not seem to fit a plain reading of "either or" and b) it immediately leads to ridiculous results. I think this is a case where Crawford's off-the-cuff response is just wrong. (And they're no longer official, so we don't have to bend reality to make them fit.)
            $endgroup$
            – mattdm
            2 days ago

















            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f144423%2fcan-i-set-a-ready-action-to-trigger-when-literally-anything-happens%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            Àrd-bhaile Cathair chruinne/Baile mòr cruinne | Artagailean ceangailte | Clàr-taice na seòladaireachd

            대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

            Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition