How to route traffic through VPN only accessible within VM (without a bridged adapter)? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election Results Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” questionRoute VPN traffic through socks proxyOnly routing certain traffic through VPNRoute only ssh traffic through VPNNetwork connectivity trouble to non-routing multi-homed hosts?Route VPN traffic through different proxiesRouting only VM traffic through VPNHow to create/setup vpn using only SSH?Script to create macvlan bridge on the host doesn't work unless it's run twiceHow to route traffic from a specific user through a VPN on LinuxHow can I override systemd's choice of default route with two network interfaces?
Why is black pepper both grey and black?
Bonus calculation: Am I making a mountain out of a molehill?
Is it true that "carbohydrates are of no use for the basal metabolic need"?
How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?
Why is "Captain Marvel" translated as male in Portugal?
How does cp -a work
List *all* the tuples!
What are 'alternative tunings' of a guitar and why would you use them? Doesn't it make it more difficult to play?
When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?
What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?
How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?
G-Code for resetting to 100% speed
What happens to sewage if there is no river near by?
If 'B is more likely given A', then 'A is more likely given B'
Is the address of a local variable a constexpr?
How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?
Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author
How can players work together to take actions that are otherwise impossible?
Check which numbers satisfy the condition [A*B*C = A! + B! + C!]
"Seemed to had" is it correct?
Is above average number of years spent on PhD considered a red flag in future academia or industry positions?
What are the motives behind Cersei's orders given to Bronn?
Do I really need recursive chmod to restrict access to a folder?
Can inflation occur in a positive-sum game currency system such as the Stack Exchange reputation system?
How to route traffic through VPN only accessible within VM (without a bridged adapter)?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Community Moderator Election Results
Why I closed the “Why is Kali so hard” questionRoute VPN traffic through socks proxyOnly routing certain traffic through VPNRoute only ssh traffic through VPNNetwork connectivity trouble to non-routing multi-homed hosts?Route VPN traffic through different proxiesRouting only VM traffic through VPNHow to create/setup vpn using only SSH?Script to create macvlan bridge on the host doesn't work unless it's run twiceHow to route traffic from a specific user through a VPN on LinuxHow can I override systemd's choice of default route with two network interfaces?
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;
I have an interesting situation where I have a corporate VPN that can only connect through a specific (outdated) version of Ubuntu (and/or Windows) using a vendor-supplied client that creates a VPN interface on tun0
upon successful authentication. I use a different distribution on my personal Linux machine, on which the VPN client will not run because of library issues.
As a workaround, I have more-or-less figured out how to configure the Ubuntu VM (on VirtualBox) to work as a router when the VM is configured in bridge mode. Unfortunately, this works on some networks (like my home one) because I can get another IP no problem for my bridged VM, but on many public networks, this does not work.
I believe I should be able to do this with two network adapters on the VM, one with NAT, and one as a Host-Only connection, but I'm not sure how to set up the routing so that I can send traffic on my host through the VPN tunnel.
Here's the setup so far:
[host]$ VBoxManage list hostonlyifs
Name: vboxnet0
GUID: 786f6276-656e-4074-8000-0a0027000000
DHCP: Disabled
IPAddress: 192.168.56.1
NetworkMask: 255.255.255.0
IPV6Address: fe80::800:27ff:fe00:0
IPV6NetworkMaskPrefixLength: 64
HardwareAddress: 0a:00:27:00:00:00
MediumType: Ethernet
Wireless: No
Status: Up
VBoxNetworkName: HostInterfaceNetworking-vboxnet0
The guest interfaces (after connecting to the vpn - enp0s3
is the NAT adapter, enp0s8
is the host-only adapter):
[guest]$ ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp0s3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:b2:d9:c2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.2.15/24 brd 10.0.2.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s3
valid_lft 83176sec preferred_lft 83176sec
3: enp0s8: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:3c:81:82 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.56.101/24 brd 192.168.56.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s8
4: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1384 qdisc fq_codel state UNKNOWN group default qlen 500
link/none
inet XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX peer 1.1.1.1/32 scope global tun0
On the guest, I enable translation between the host-only adapter and the VPN tunnel with the following commands:
sudo sysctl net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
sudo sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i enp0s8 -o tun0 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i tun0 -o enp0s8 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o tun0 -j MASQUERADE
On the host, I can replace the default route with 192.168.56.1
(the host-only VM adapter), but then obviously no data can get out at all. Since the VM is not getting it's own access to the internet, I need to have some traffic coming in/out to the internet through the host, but then I would like to force as much as possible of that to go through the VM's VPN connection. It feels like I'm close, and this should be possible, but I'm not sure what the missing piece is.
On a side note, I think I could get this to work for certain applications by perhaps doing an SSH SOCKS proxy to the VM, perhaps? I'd like to route all traffic through the VPN, if possible.
virtualbox virtual-machine routing vpn
add a comment |
I have an interesting situation where I have a corporate VPN that can only connect through a specific (outdated) version of Ubuntu (and/or Windows) using a vendor-supplied client that creates a VPN interface on tun0
upon successful authentication. I use a different distribution on my personal Linux machine, on which the VPN client will not run because of library issues.
As a workaround, I have more-or-less figured out how to configure the Ubuntu VM (on VirtualBox) to work as a router when the VM is configured in bridge mode. Unfortunately, this works on some networks (like my home one) because I can get another IP no problem for my bridged VM, but on many public networks, this does not work.
I believe I should be able to do this with two network adapters on the VM, one with NAT, and one as a Host-Only connection, but I'm not sure how to set up the routing so that I can send traffic on my host through the VPN tunnel.
Here's the setup so far:
[host]$ VBoxManage list hostonlyifs
Name: vboxnet0
GUID: 786f6276-656e-4074-8000-0a0027000000
DHCP: Disabled
IPAddress: 192.168.56.1
NetworkMask: 255.255.255.0
IPV6Address: fe80::800:27ff:fe00:0
IPV6NetworkMaskPrefixLength: 64
HardwareAddress: 0a:00:27:00:00:00
MediumType: Ethernet
Wireless: No
Status: Up
VBoxNetworkName: HostInterfaceNetworking-vboxnet0
The guest interfaces (after connecting to the vpn - enp0s3
is the NAT adapter, enp0s8
is the host-only adapter):
[guest]$ ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp0s3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:b2:d9:c2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.2.15/24 brd 10.0.2.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s3
valid_lft 83176sec preferred_lft 83176sec
3: enp0s8: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:3c:81:82 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.56.101/24 brd 192.168.56.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s8
4: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1384 qdisc fq_codel state UNKNOWN group default qlen 500
link/none
inet XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX peer 1.1.1.1/32 scope global tun0
On the guest, I enable translation between the host-only adapter and the VPN tunnel with the following commands:
sudo sysctl net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
sudo sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i enp0s8 -o tun0 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i tun0 -o enp0s8 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o tun0 -j MASQUERADE
On the host, I can replace the default route with 192.168.56.1
(the host-only VM adapter), but then obviously no data can get out at all. Since the VM is not getting it's own access to the internet, I need to have some traffic coming in/out to the internet through the host, but then I would like to force as much as possible of that to go through the VM's VPN connection. It feels like I'm close, and this should be possible, but I'm not sure what the missing piece is.
On a side note, I think I could get this to work for certain applications by perhaps doing an SSH SOCKS proxy to the VM, perhaps? I'd like to route all traffic through the VPN, if possible.
virtualbox virtual-machine routing vpn
which VPN is it?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 18:29
@RuiFRibeiro it's a corporate-supplied custom client that handles the authentication and provides a network interface (tun0
) and is not configurable in any way due to security considerations (not a standard OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP, etc.)
– jat255
Apr 11 at 18:46
Is it Checkpoint?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 21:59
@RuiFRibeiro no, it's not. I'd rather not provide more details on the VPN, since the question is more about routing, than the actual VPN
– jat255
Apr 11 at 22:03
add a comment |
I have an interesting situation where I have a corporate VPN that can only connect through a specific (outdated) version of Ubuntu (and/or Windows) using a vendor-supplied client that creates a VPN interface on tun0
upon successful authentication. I use a different distribution on my personal Linux machine, on which the VPN client will not run because of library issues.
As a workaround, I have more-or-less figured out how to configure the Ubuntu VM (on VirtualBox) to work as a router when the VM is configured in bridge mode. Unfortunately, this works on some networks (like my home one) because I can get another IP no problem for my bridged VM, but on many public networks, this does not work.
I believe I should be able to do this with two network adapters on the VM, one with NAT, and one as a Host-Only connection, but I'm not sure how to set up the routing so that I can send traffic on my host through the VPN tunnel.
Here's the setup so far:
[host]$ VBoxManage list hostonlyifs
Name: vboxnet0
GUID: 786f6276-656e-4074-8000-0a0027000000
DHCP: Disabled
IPAddress: 192.168.56.1
NetworkMask: 255.255.255.0
IPV6Address: fe80::800:27ff:fe00:0
IPV6NetworkMaskPrefixLength: 64
HardwareAddress: 0a:00:27:00:00:00
MediumType: Ethernet
Wireless: No
Status: Up
VBoxNetworkName: HostInterfaceNetworking-vboxnet0
The guest interfaces (after connecting to the vpn - enp0s3
is the NAT adapter, enp0s8
is the host-only adapter):
[guest]$ ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp0s3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:b2:d9:c2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.2.15/24 brd 10.0.2.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s3
valid_lft 83176sec preferred_lft 83176sec
3: enp0s8: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:3c:81:82 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.56.101/24 brd 192.168.56.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s8
4: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1384 qdisc fq_codel state UNKNOWN group default qlen 500
link/none
inet XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX peer 1.1.1.1/32 scope global tun0
On the guest, I enable translation between the host-only adapter and the VPN tunnel with the following commands:
sudo sysctl net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
sudo sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i enp0s8 -o tun0 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i tun0 -o enp0s8 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o tun0 -j MASQUERADE
On the host, I can replace the default route with 192.168.56.1
(the host-only VM adapter), but then obviously no data can get out at all. Since the VM is not getting it's own access to the internet, I need to have some traffic coming in/out to the internet through the host, but then I would like to force as much as possible of that to go through the VM's VPN connection. It feels like I'm close, and this should be possible, but I'm not sure what the missing piece is.
On a side note, I think I could get this to work for certain applications by perhaps doing an SSH SOCKS proxy to the VM, perhaps? I'd like to route all traffic through the VPN, if possible.
virtualbox virtual-machine routing vpn
I have an interesting situation where I have a corporate VPN that can only connect through a specific (outdated) version of Ubuntu (and/or Windows) using a vendor-supplied client that creates a VPN interface on tun0
upon successful authentication. I use a different distribution on my personal Linux machine, on which the VPN client will not run because of library issues.
As a workaround, I have more-or-less figured out how to configure the Ubuntu VM (on VirtualBox) to work as a router when the VM is configured in bridge mode. Unfortunately, this works on some networks (like my home one) because I can get another IP no problem for my bridged VM, but on many public networks, this does not work.
I believe I should be able to do this with two network adapters on the VM, one with NAT, and one as a Host-Only connection, but I'm not sure how to set up the routing so that I can send traffic on my host through the VPN tunnel.
Here's the setup so far:
[host]$ VBoxManage list hostonlyifs
Name: vboxnet0
GUID: 786f6276-656e-4074-8000-0a0027000000
DHCP: Disabled
IPAddress: 192.168.56.1
NetworkMask: 255.255.255.0
IPV6Address: fe80::800:27ff:fe00:0
IPV6NetworkMaskPrefixLength: 64
HardwareAddress: 0a:00:27:00:00:00
MediumType: Ethernet
Wireless: No
Status: Up
VBoxNetworkName: HostInterfaceNetworking-vboxnet0
The guest interfaces (after connecting to the vpn - enp0s3
is the NAT adapter, enp0s8
is the host-only adapter):
[guest]$ ip addr show
1: lo: <LOOPBACK,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet 127.0.0.1/8 scope host lo
valid_lft forever preferred_lft forever
2: enp0s3: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:b2:d9:c2 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 10.0.2.15/24 brd 10.0.2.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s3
valid_lft 83176sec preferred_lft 83176sec
3: enp0s8: <BROADCAST,MULTICAST,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1500 qdisc fq_codel state UP group default qlen 1000
link/ether 08:00:27:3c:81:82 brd ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff
inet 192.168.56.101/24 brd 192.168.56.255 scope global dynamic noprefixroute enp0s8
4: tun0: <POINTOPOINT,UP,LOWER_UP> mtu 1384 qdisc fq_codel state UNKNOWN group default qlen 500
link/none
inet XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX peer 1.1.1.1/32 scope global tun0
On the guest, I enable translation between the host-only adapter and the VPN tunnel with the following commands:
sudo sysctl net.ipv4.conf.all.forwarding=1
sudo sysctl net.ipv6.conf.all.forwarding=1
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i enp0s8 -o tun0 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -A FORWARD -i tun0 -o enp0s8 -j ACCEPT
sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o tun0 -j MASQUERADE
On the host, I can replace the default route with 192.168.56.1
(the host-only VM adapter), but then obviously no data can get out at all. Since the VM is not getting it's own access to the internet, I need to have some traffic coming in/out to the internet through the host, but then I would like to force as much as possible of that to go through the VM's VPN connection. It feels like I'm close, and this should be possible, but I'm not sure what the missing piece is.
On a side note, I think I could get this to work for certain applications by perhaps doing an SSH SOCKS proxy to the VM, perhaps? I'd like to route all traffic through the VPN, if possible.
virtualbox virtual-machine routing vpn
virtualbox virtual-machine routing vpn
asked Apr 11 at 18:24
jat255jat255
26137
26137
which VPN is it?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 18:29
@RuiFRibeiro it's a corporate-supplied custom client that handles the authentication and provides a network interface (tun0
) and is not configurable in any way due to security considerations (not a standard OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP, etc.)
– jat255
Apr 11 at 18:46
Is it Checkpoint?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 21:59
@RuiFRibeiro no, it's not. I'd rather not provide more details on the VPN, since the question is more about routing, than the actual VPN
– jat255
Apr 11 at 22:03
add a comment |
which VPN is it?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 18:29
@RuiFRibeiro it's a corporate-supplied custom client that handles the authentication and provides a network interface (tun0
) and is not configurable in any way due to security considerations (not a standard OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP, etc.)
– jat255
Apr 11 at 18:46
Is it Checkpoint?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 21:59
@RuiFRibeiro no, it's not. I'd rather not provide more details on the VPN, since the question is more about routing, than the actual VPN
– jat255
Apr 11 at 22:03
which VPN is it?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 18:29
which VPN is it?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 18:29
@RuiFRibeiro it's a corporate-supplied custom client that handles the authentication and provides a network interface (
tun0
) and is not configurable in any way due to security considerations (not a standard OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP, etc.)– jat255
Apr 11 at 18:46
@RuiFRibeiro it's a corporate-supplied custom client that handles the authentication and provides a network interface (
tun0
) and is not configurable in any way due to security considerations (not a standard OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP, etc.)– jat255
Apr 11 at 18:46
Is it Checkpoint?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 21:59
Is it Checkpoint?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 21:59
@RuiFRibeiro no, it's not. I'd rather not provide more details on the VPN, since the question is more about routing, than the actual VPN
– jat255
Apr 11 at 22:03
@RuiFRibeiro no, it's not. I'd rather not provide more details on the VPN, since the question is more about routing, than the actual VPN
– jat255
Apr 11 at 22:03
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f511967%2fhow-to-route-traffic-through-vpn-only-accessible-within-vm-without-a-bridged-ad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f511967%2fhow-to-route-traffic-through-vpn-only-accessible-within-vm-without-a-bridged-ad%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
which VPN is it?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 18:29
@RuiFRibeiro it's a corporate-supplied custom client that handles the authentication and provides a network interface (
tun0
) and is not configurable in any way due to security considerations (not a standard OpenVPN, L2TP, PPTP, etc.)– jat255
Apr 11 at 18:46
Is it Checkpoint?
– Rui F Ribeiro
Apr 11 at 21:59
@RuiFRibeiro no, it's not. I'd rather not provide more details on the VPN, since the question is more about routing, than the actual VPN
– jat255
Apr 11 at 22:03