if condition in the pastWhat does the “would have been” express in this sentence?

New order #4: World

I’m planning on buying a laser printer but concerned about the life cycle of toner in the machine

Is it wise to hold on to stock that has plummeted and then stabilized?

I see my dog run

Ideas for 3rd eye abilities

Can I legally use front facing blue light in the UK?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Why is my log file so massive? 22gb. I am running log backups

Landlord wants to switch my lease to a "Land contract" to "get back at the city"

Unbreakable Formation vs. Cry of the Carnarium

Calculate Levenshtein distance between two strings in Python

Prime joint compound before latex paint?

Shall I use personal or official e-mail account when registering to external websites for work purpose?

How to move the player while also allowing forces to affect it

aging parents with no investments

What is the meaning of "of trouble" in the following sentence?

Are objects structures and/or vice versa?

Why did the Germans forbid the possession of pet pigeons in Rostov-on-Don in 1941?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

Symmetry in quantum mechanics

Information to fellow intern about hiring?

Is there a name of the flying bionic bird?

How can I fix this gap between bookcases I made?

What is GPS' 19 year rollover and does it present a cybersecurity issue?



if condition in the past


What does the “would have been” express in this sentence?






.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5















I want to ask someone that why he didn't tell me something in the past and I want to say the sentence as below:




if you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




as I know this is not based on if condition formats and maybe I should have say:




if you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday.




I am curious to know which sentence is correct if any of them is correct.










share|improve this question













migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 5 at 22:29


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.













  • 2





    If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?

    – Smock
    Apr 5 at 15:44











  • thx @Smock but based on third if condition format, if I am using past verb in the if part I should use "would" in the second part , please correct me if I wrong

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 15:48






  • 1





    It's not really a conditional statement as there is no statement, only a question. Conditional tenses are used to speculate about what could happen, what might have happened, and what we wish would happen. 'If you knew yesterday, you would have told me'.

    – Smock
    Apr 5 at 16:18






  • 1





    The version with would is used when the part that comes after if is hypothetical, as in if one day you realised you didn't love me, would you tell me? In your sentence there is no hypothetical, you are saying you knew yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then? That's why the would does not fit.

    – Minty
    Apr 5 at 16:36






  • 1





    This is not a conditional, so you shouldn't expect it to follow one of the three or four canonical conditional patterns. It can be rewritten as: You knew that yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then. Your alternative version with would is also not a conditional, and means: You knew that yesterday, so why wouldn't you (were you not willing to) tell me then? There are numerous other responses to conditional questions on this site quashing the notion that there are only three or four conditional constructions.

    – Shoe
    Apr 5 at 19:22

















5















I want to ask someone that why he didn't tell me something in the past and I want to say the sentence as below:




if you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




as I know this is not based on if condition formats and maybe I should have say:




if you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday.




I am curious to know which sentence is correct if any of them is correct.










share|improve this question













migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 5 at 22:29


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.













  • 2





    If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?

    – Smock
    Apr 5 at 15:44











  • thx @Smock but based on third if condition format, if I am using past verb in the if part I should use "would" in the second part , please correct me if I wrong

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 15:48






  • 1





    It's not really a conditional statement as there is no statement, only a question. Conditional tenses are used to speculate about what could happen, what might have happened, and what we wish would happen. 'If you knew yesterday, you would have told me'.

    – Smock
    Apr 5 at 16:18






  • 1





    The version with would is used when the part that comes after if is hypothetical, as in if one day you realised you didn't love me, would you tell me? In your sentence there is no hypothetical, you are saying you knew yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then? That's why the would does not fit.

    – Minty
    Apr 5 at 16:36






  • 1





    This is not a conditional, so you shouldn't expect it to follow one of the three or four canonical conditional patterns. It can be rewritten as: You knew that yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then. Your alternative version with would is also not a conditional, and means: You knew that yesterday, so why wouldn't you (were you not willing to) tell me then? There are numerous other responses to conditional questions on this site quashing the notion that there are only three or four conditional constructions.

    – Shoe
    Apr 5 at 19:22













5












5








5








I want to ask someone that why he didn't tell me something in the past and I want to say the sentence as below:




if you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




as I know this is not based on if condition formats and maybe I should have say:




if you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday.




I am curious to know which sentence is correct if any of them is correct.










share|improve this question














I want to ask someone that why he didn't tell me something in the past and I want to say the sentence as below:




if you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




as I know this is not based on if condition formats and maybe I should have say:




if you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday.




I am curious to know which sentence is correct if any of them is correct.







conditionals






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked Apr 5 at 15:42









joe gatesjoe gates

282




282




migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 5 at 22:29


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.









migrated from english.stackexchange.com Apr 5 at 22:29


This question came from our site for linguists, etymologists, and serious English language enthusiasts.









  • 2





    If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?

    – Smock
    Apr 5 at 15:44











  • thx @Smock but based on third if condition format, if I am using past verb in the if part I should use "would" in the second part , please correct me if I wrong

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 15:48






  • 1





    It's not really a conditional statement as there is no statement, only a question. Conditional tenses are used to speculate about what could happen, what might have happened, and what we wish would happen. 'If you knew yesterday, you would have told me'.

    – Smock
    Apr 5 at 16:18






  • 1





    The version with would is used when the part that comes after if is hypothetical, as in if one day you realised you didn't love me, would you tell me? In your sentence there is no hypothetical, you are saying you knew yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then? That's why the would does not fit.

    – Minty
    Apr 5 at 16:36






  • 1





    This is not a conditional, so you shouldn't expect it to follow one of the three or four canonical conditional patterns. It can be rewritten as: You knew that yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then. Your alternative version with would is also not a conditional, and means: You knew that yesterday, so why wouldn't you (were you not willing to) tell me then? There are numerous other responses to conditional questions on this site quashing the notion that there are only three or four conditional constructions.

    – Shoe
    Apr 5 at 19:22












  • 2





    If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?

    – Smock
    Apr 5 at 15:44











  • thx @Smock but based on third if condition format, if I am using past verb in the if part I should use "would" in the second part , please correct me if I wrong

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 15:48






  • 1





    It's not really a conditional statement as there is no statement, only a question. Conditional tenses are used to speculate about what could happen, what might have happened, and what we wish would happen. 'If you knew yesterday, you would have told me'.

    – Smock
    Apr 5 at 16:18






  • 1





    The version with would is used when the part that comes after if is hypothetical, as in if one day you realised you didn't love me, would you tell me? In your sentence there is no hypothetical, you are saying you knew yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then? That's why the would does not fit.

    – Minty
    Apr 5 at 16:36






  • 1





    This is not a conditional, so you shouldn't expect it to follow one of the three or four canonical conditional patterns. It can be rewritten as: You knew that yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then. Your alternative version with would is also not a conditional, and means: You knew that yesterday, so why wouldn't you (were you not willing to) tell me then? There are numerous other responses to conditional questions on this site quashing the notion that there are only three or four conditional constructions.

    – Shoe
    Apr 5 at 19:22







2




2





If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?

– Smock
Apr 5 at 15:44





If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?

– Smock
Apr 5 at 15:44













thx @Smock but based on third if condition format, if I am using past verb in the if part I should use "would" in the second part , please correct me if I wrong

– joe gates
Apr 5 at 15:48





thx @Smock but based on third if condition format, if I am using past verb in the if part I should use "would" in the second part , please correct me if I wrong

– joe gates
Apr 5 at 15:48




1




1





It's not really a conditional statement as there is no statement, only a question. Conditional tenses are used to speculate about what could happen, what might have happened, and what we wish would happen. 'If you knew yesterday, you would have told me'.

– Smock
Apr 5 at 16:18





It's not really a conditional statement as there is no statement, only a question. Conditional tenses are used to speculate about what could happen, what might have happened, and what we wish would happen. 'If you knew yesterday, you would have told me'.

– Smock
Apr 5 at 16:18




1




1





The version with would is used when the part that comes after if is hypothetical, as in if one day you realised you didn't love me, would you tell me? In your sentence there is no hypothetical, you are saying you knew yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then? That's why the would does not fit.

– Minty
Apr 5 at 16:36





The version with would is used when the part that comes after if is hypothetical, as in if one day you realised you didn't love me, would you tell me? In your sentence there is no hypothetical, you are saying you knew yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then? That's why the would does not fit.

– Minty
Apr 5 at 16:36




1




1





This is not a conditional, so you shouldn't expect it to follow one of the three or four canonical conditional patterns. It can be rewritten as: You knew that yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then. Your alternative version with would is also not a conditional, and means: You knew that yesterday, so why wouldn't you (were you not willing to) tell me then? There are numerous other responses to conditional questions on this site quashing the notion that there are only three or four conditional constructions.

– Shoe
Apr 5 at 19:22





This is not a conditional, so you shouldn't expect it to follow one of the three or four canonical conditional patterns. It can be rewritten as: You knew that yesterday, so why didn't you tell me then. Your alternative version with would is also not a conditional, and means: You knew that yesterday, so why wouldn't you (were you not willing to) tell me then? There are numerous other responses to conditional questions on this site quashing the notion that there are only three or four conditional constructions.

– Shoe
Apr 5 at 19:22










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Past verbs are often used for hypothetical conditions (what I think your teachers call "second conditional", but I've never heard that expression outside ESL teaching, so I'm not certain, and most English speakers won't know what you're talking about if you say it).



But this is not a hypothetical conditional, but a real conditional (what I think is called "first conditional") that happens to be in the past.



The first form you give




If you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




is perfectly normal and grammatical.



The second form




If you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?




is also grammatical, but has a slightly different meaning. The modal verb "would" has several other meanings apart from its use as a pseudo-tense. Here it either means "why were you not willing to tell me yesterday?"; or else as an epistemic modal, meaning something like "Why could it possibly be the case that you didn't tell me yesterday?"






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    I think you need to address the flipped word order of "you didn't" and "you wouldn't"

    – THiebert
    Apr 5 at 18:20






  • 7





    To be clear neither "why you didn't tell me yesterday?" nor "why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?" are correct English.

    – DJClayworth
    Apr 5 at 18:28






  • 1





    To be more clear, "you didn't" and "you wouldn't" are not grammatical in this context, they should be "didn't you" and "wouldn't you".

    – Barmar
    Apr 5 at 19:49











  • True. I missed that point.

    – Colin Fine
    Apr 5 at 21:59


















3














This seems most natural to me:




If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?




I'm trying to come up with a sentence using 'wouldn't' but they all feel terribly clumsy. These are about the best I can do:




If you knew yesterday, why would you not have told me?




or




If you knew yesterday, why wouldn't you have told me?




I suppose if you had asked someone about something the day before, but they said they didn't know, but then revealed that they did know, you could use this:




If you already knew, why wouldn't you tell me yesterday? (when I asked)




but it's still a bit clumsy, and the 'didn't' form still sounds better to my ear



Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question?
Are you saying you think they are lying about knowing yesterday?



You could say this in the third conditional:




If you knew yesterday, you would have told me [already/yesterday]







share|improve this answer























  • I am getting your point but my problem is that based on conditional formula if I am using the past verb in the if part, I have to use "would" in the second part but this is against that rule (third conditional formula)

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 16:03






  • 1





    @joegates This is all contingent on how many conditionals you think actually exist: most EFL/ESL teachers would have it as only 3, but there are also mixed forms. Also...you did not invert the subject and verb in the question, making both sentences sound unnatural.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 18:32











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204093%2fif-condition-in-the-past%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Past verbs are often used for hypothetical conditions (what I think your teachers call "second conditional", but I've never heard that expression outside ESL teaching, so I'm not certain, and most English speakers won't know what you're talking about if you say it).



But this is not a hypothetical conditional, but a real conditional (what I think is called "first conditional") that happens to be in the past.



The first form you give




If you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




is perfectly normal and grammatical.



The second form




If you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?




is also grammatical, but has a slightly different meaning. The modal verb "would" has several other meanings apart from its use as a pseudo-tense. Here it either means "why were you not willing to tell me yesterday?"; or else as an epistemic modal, meaning something like "Why could it possibly be the case that you didn't tell me yesterday?"






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    I think you need to address the flipped word order of "you didn't" and "you wouldn't"

    – THiebert
    Apr 5 at 18:20






  • 7





    To be clear neither "why you didn't tell me yesterday?" nor "why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?" are correct English.

    – DJClayworth
    Apr 5 at 18:28






  • 1





    To be more clear, "you didn't" and "you wouldn't" are not grammatical in this context, they should be "didn't you" and "wouldn't you".

    – Barmar
    Apr 5 at 19:49











  • True. I missed that point.

    – Colin Fine
    Apr 5 at 21:59















3














Past verbs are often used for hypothetical conditions (what I think your teachers call "second conditional", but I've never heard that expression outside ESL teaching, so I'm not certain, and most English speakers won't know what you're talking about if you say it).



But this is not a hypothetical conditional, but a real conditional (what I think is called "first conditional") that happens to be in the past.



The first form you give




If you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




is perfectly normal and grammatical.



The second form




If you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?




is also grammatical, but has a slightly different meaning. The modal verb "would" has several other meanings apart from its use as a pseudo-tense. Here it either means "why were you not willing to tell me yesterday?"; or else as an epistemic modal, meaning something like "Why could it possibly be the case that you didn't tell me yesterday?"






share|improve this answer


















  • 6





    I think you need to address the flipped word order of "you didn't" and "you wouldn't"

    – THiebert
    Apr 5 at 18:20






  • 7





    To be clear neither "why you didn't tell me yesterday?" nor "why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?" are correct English.

    – DJClayworth
    Apr 5 at 18:28






  • 1





    To be more clear, "you didn't" and "you wouldn't" are not grammatical in this context, they should be "didn't you" and "wouldn't you".

    – Barmar
    Apr 5 at 19:49











  • True. I missed that point.

    – Colin Fine
    Apr 5 at 21:59













3












3








3







Past verbs are often used for hypothetical conditions (what I think your teachers call "second conditional", but I've never heard that expression outside ESL teaching, so I'm not certain, and most English speakers won't know what you're talking about if you say it).



But this is not a hypothetical conditional, but a real conditional (what I think is called "first conditional") that happens to be in the past.



The first form you give




If you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




is perfectly normal and grammatical.



The second form




If you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?




is also grammatical, but has a slightly different meaning. The modal verb "would" has several other meanings apart from its use as a pseudo-tense. Here it either means "why were you not willing to tell me yesterday?"; or else as an epistemic modal, meaning something like "Why could it possibly be the case that you didn't tell me yesterday?"






share|improve this answer













Past verbs are often used for hypothetical conditions (what I think your teachers call "second conditional", but I've never heard that expression outside ESL teaching, so I'm not certain, and most English speakers won't know what you're talking about if you say it).



But this is not a hypothetical conditional, but a real conditional (what I think is called "first conditional") that happens to be in the past.



The first form you give




If you knew that yesterday why you didn't tell me yesterday?




is perfectly normal and grammatical.



The second form




If you knew that yesterday why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?




is also grammatical, but has a slightly different meaning. The modal verb "would" has several other meanings apart from its use as a pseudo-tense. Here it either means "why were you not willing to tell me yesterday?"; or else as an epistemic modal, meaning something like "Why could it possibly be the case that you didn't tell me yesterday?"







share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 5 at 16:27









Colin FineColin Fine

31.8k24561




31.8k24561







  • 6





    I think you need to address the flipped word order of "you didn't" and "you wouldn't"

    – THiebert
    Apr 5 at 18:20






  • 7





    To be clear neither "why you didn't tell me yesterday?" nor "why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?" are correct English.

    – DJClayworth
    Apr 5 at 18:28






  • 1





    To be more clear, "you didn't" and "you wouldn't" are not grammatical in this context, they should be "didn't you" and "wouldn't you".

    – Barmar
    Apr 5 at 19:49











  • True. I missed that point.

    – Colin Fine
    Apr 5 at 21:59












  • 6





    I think you need to address the flipped word order of "you didn't" and "you wouldn't"

    – THiebert
    Apr 5 at 18:20






  • 7





    To be clear neither "why you didn't tell me yesterday?" nor "why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?" are correct English.

    – DJClayworth
    Apr 5 at 18:28






  • 1





    To be more clear, "you didn't" and "you wouldn't" are not grammatical in this context, they should be "didn't you" and "wouldn't you".

    – Barmar
    Apr 5 at 19:49











  • True. I missed that point.

    – Colin Fine
    Apr 5 at 21:59







6




6





I think you need to address the flipped word order of "you didn't" and "you wouldn't"

– THiebert
Apr 5 at 18:20





I think you need to address the flipped word order of "you didn't" and "you wouldn't"

– THiebert
Apr 5 at 18:20




7




7





To be clear neither "why you didn't tell me yesterday?" nor "why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?" are correct English.

– DJClayworth
Apr 5 at 18:28





To be clear neither "why you didn't tell me yesterday?" nor "why you wouldn't tell me yesterday?" are correct English.

– DJClayworth
Apr 5 at 18:28




1




1





To be more clear, "you didn't" and "you wouldn't" are not grammatical in this context, they should be "didn't you" and "wouldn't you".

– Barmar
Apr 5 at 19:49





To be more clear, "you didn't" and "you wouldn't" are not grammatical in this context, they should be "didn't you" and "wouldn't you".

– Barmar
Apr 5 at 19:49













True. I missed that point.

– Colin Fine
Apr 5 at 21:59





True. I missed that point.

– Colin Fine
Apr 5 at 21:59













3














This seems most natural to me:




If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?




I'm trying to come up with a sentence using 'wouldn't' but they all feel terribly clumsy. These are about the best I can do:




If you knew yesterday, why would you not have told me?




or




If you knew yesterday, why wouldn't you have told me?




I suppose if you had asked someone about something the day before, but they said they didn't know, but then revealed that they did know, you could use this:




If you already knew, why wouldn't you tell me yesterday? (when I asked)




but it's still a bit clumsy, and the 'didn't' form still sounds better to my ear



Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question?
Are you saying you think they are lying about knowing yesterday?



You could say this in the third conditional:




If you knew yesterday, you would have told me [already/yesterday]







share|improve this answer























  • I am getting your point but my problem is that based on conditional formula if I am using the past verb in the if part, I have to use "would" in the second part but this is against that rule (third conditional formula)

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 16:03






  • 1





    @joegates This is all contingent on how many conditionals you think actually exist: most EFL/ESL teachers would have it as only 3, but there are also mixed forms. Also...you did not invert the subject and verb in the question, making both sentences sound unnatural.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 18:32















3














This seems most natural to me:




If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?




I'm trying to come up with a sentence using 'wouldn't' but they all feel terribly clumsy. These are about the best I can do:




If you knew yesterday, why would you not have told me?




or




If you knew yesterday, why wouldn't you have told me?




I suppose if you had asked someone about something the day before, but they said they didn't know, but then revealed that they did know, you could use this:




If you already knew, why wouldn't you tell me yesterday? (when I asked)




but it's still a bit clumsy, and the 'didn't' form still sounds better to my ear



Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question?
Are you saying you think they are lying about knowing yesterday?



You could say this in the third conditional:




If you knew yesterday, you would have told me [already/yesterday]







share|improve this answer























  • I am getting your point but my problem is that based on conditional formula if I am using the past verb in the if part, I have to use "would" in the second part but this is against that rule (third conditional formula)

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 16:03






  • 1





    @joegates This is all contingent on how many conditionals you think actually exist: most EFL/ESL teachers would have it as only 3, but there are also mixed forms. Also...you did not invert the subject and verb in the question, making both sentences sound unnatural.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 18:32













3












3








3







This seems most natural to me:




If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?




I'm trying to come up with a sentence using 'wouldn't' but they all feel terribly clumsy. These are about the best I can do:




If you knew yesterday, why would you not have told me?




or




If you knew yesterday, why wouldn't you have told me?




I suppose if you had asked someone about something the day before, but they said they didn't know, but then revealed that they did know, you could use this:




If you already knew, why wouldn't you tell me yesterday? (when I asked)




but it's still a bit clumsy, and the 'didn't' form still sounds better to my ear



Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question?
Are you saying you think they are lying about knowing yesterday?



You could say this in the third conditional:




If you knew yesterday, you would have told me [already/yesterday]







share|improve this answer













This seems most natural to me:




If you knew that yesterday why didn't you tell me [then/at the time/yesterday]?




I'm trying to come up with a sentence using 'wouldn't' but they all feel terribly clumsy. These are about the best I can do:




If you knew yesterday, why would you not have told me?




or




If you knew yesterday, why wouldn't you have told me?




I suppose if you had asked someone about something the day before, but they said they didn't know, but then revealed that they did know, you could use this:




If you already knew, why wouldn't you tell me yesterday? (when I asked)




but it's still a bit clumsy, and the 'didn't' form still sounds better to my ear



Maybe I'm misunderstanding the question?
Are you saying you think they are lying about knowing yesterday?



You could say this in the third conditional:




If you knew yesterday, you would have told me [already/yesterday]








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Apr 5 at 15:57









SmockSmock

3916




3916












  • I am getting your point but my problem is that based on conditional formula if I am using the past verb in the if part, I have to use "would" in the second part but this is against that rule (third conditional formula)

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 16:03






  • 1





    @joegates This is all contingent on how many conditionals you think actually exist: most EFL/ESL teachers would have it as only 3, but there are also mixed forms. Also...you did not invert the subject and verb in the question, making both sentences sound unnatural.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 18:32

















  • I am getting your point but my problem is that based on conditional formula if I am using the past verb in the if part, I have to use "would" in the second part but this is against that rule (third conditional formula)

    – joe gates
    Apr 5 at 16:03






  • 1





    @joegates This is all contingent on how many conditionals you think actually exist: most EFL/ESL teachers would have it as only 3, but there are also mixed forms. Also...you did not invert the subject and verb in the question, making both sentences sound unnatural.

    – Cascabel
    Apr 5 at 18:32
















I am getting your point but my problem is that based on conditional formula if I am using the past verb in the if part, I have to use "would" in the second part but this is against that rule (third conditional formula)

– joe gates
Apr 5 at 16:03





I am getting your point but my problem is that based on conditional formula if I am using the past verb in the if part, I have to use "would" in the second part but this is against that rule (third conditional formula)

– joe gates
Apr 5 at 16:03




1




1





@joegates This is all contingent on how many conditionals you think actually exist: most EFL/ESL teachers would have it as only 3, but there are also mixed forms. Also...you did not invert the subject and verb in the question, making both sentences sound unnatural.

– Cascabel
Apr 5 at 18:32





@joegates This is all contingent on how many conditionals you think actually exist: most EFL/ESL teachers would have it as only 3, but there are also mixed forms. Also...you did not invert the subject and verb in the question, making both sentences sound unnatural.

– Cascabel
Apr 5 at 18:32

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f204093%2fif-condition-in-the-past%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495