Can you use Vicious Mockery to win an argument or gain favours?Can a bard cast Vicious Mockery without passersby thinking it's an attack?Is there a rule for how to handle creative use of spells?Can an Eldritch Knight use the bonus-action attack granted by War Magic before casting the spell as an action?Does Psychic Crush cause stunning on a successful save also?Is Ego Whip a charm-based attack?Vicious Mockery on non-humanoid targets?Is this modification of the Vicious Mockery cantrip overpowered?Potent Cantrip with Toll the Dead vs EvasionCan a bard cast Vicious Mockery without passersby thinking it's an attack?Does this cantrip have a fair risk/reward balance?Does the Fear spell work with an Oath of Conquest paladin's Aura of Conquest?Is there any way to damage Intellect Devourer(s) when already within a creature's skull?
Multiplicative persistence
It grows, but water kills it
Can a College of Swords bard use a Blade Flourish option on an opportunity attack provoked by their own Dissonant Whispers spell?
Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?
Can a Canadian Travel to the USA twice, less than 180 days each time?
Can a stoichiometric mixture of oxygen and methane exist as a liquid at standard pressure and some (low) temperature?
How should I respond when I lied about my education and the company finds out through background check?
Extract more than nine arguments that occur periodically in a sentence to use in macros in order to typset
How do apertures which seem too large to physically fit work?
What should you do if you miss a job interview (deliberately)?
Fear of getting stuck on one programming language / technology that is not used in my country
14 year old daughter buying thongs
Creepy dinosaur pc game identification
What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?
Mixing PEX brands
Are Captain Marvel's powers affected by Thanos' actions in Infinity War
Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?
Can disgust be a key component of horror?
Keeping a ball lost forever
What is the highest possible scrabble score for placing a single tile
Does the Linux kernel need a file system to run?
What should you do when eye contact makes your subordinate uncomfortable?
PTIJ: Haman's bad computer
The probability of Bus A arriving before Bus B
Can you use Vicious Mockery to win an argument or gain favours?
Can a bard cast Vicious Mockery without passersby thinking it's an attack?Is there a rule for how to handle creative use of spells?Can an Eldritch Knight use the bonus-action attack granted by War Magic before casting the spell as an action?Does Psychic Crush cause stunning on a successful save also?Is Ego Whip a charm-based attack?Vicious Mockery on non-humanoid targets?Is this modification of the Vicious Mockery cantrip overpowered?Potent Cantrip with Toll the Dead vs EvasionCan a bard cast Vicious Mockery without passersby thinking it's an attack?Does this cantrip have a fair risk/reward balance?Does the Fear spell work with an Oath of Conquest paladin's Aura of Conquest?Is there any way to damage Intellect Devourer(s) when already within a creature's skull?
$begingroup$
Though I know that RAW states that Vicious Mockery is initiated through a "string of insults", my question is about what would happen if you used it elsewhere than a tavern brawl or the like.
As a reference, the cantrip Vicious Mockery is written as:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you
(though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom
saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on
the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
This spell's damage increases by 1d4 when you reach 5th level (2d4),
11th level (3d4), and 17th level (4d4).
Unlike similar opinion-effecting spells like Friends and Charm Person, the wording of this spell doesn't finish with a caveat "when the spell ends, they will know you influenced them and it will piss them off", revealing that, it's the insults and not the subtle enchantments that will upset them.
Given this, my understanding of how the cantrip works is that you insult someone, using magical enchantments to boost the persuasiveness of your words. If they fail a wisdom saving throw, they take your words to heart, shading their next move with a veil of sadness, doubt, or fear clouding their judgment. As your words sting, they take minute psychic damage.
If that's the case then, I'm curious to know what would happen if your character tried lacing the same subtle enchantments while attempting other feats of persuasion?
Would your words of endearment seem more authentic when using it to court a potential partner? Would your opinion seem more valid when using it to settle an argument? Would the opinion someone has of you become more likable when trying to dispel doubt in an argument? ... Or will everything sound like an insult?
Though I realize that this does not guarantee the character's desired outcome and the added effects can be negated if they succeed a wisdom saving throw, I'm wondering if it would be a way for a character to increase their chance for a favorable outcome without the other person feeling swindled or used in the end...
dnd-5e spells social-combat
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.4k486156
asked yesterday
Victor BVictor B
1,136223
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Though I know that RAW states that Vicious Mockery is initiated through a "string of insults", my question is about what would happen if you used it elsewhere than a tavern brawl or the like.
As a reference, the cantrip Vicious Mockery is written as:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you
(though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom
saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on
the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
This spell's damage increases by 1d4 when you reach 5th level (2d4),
11th level (3d4), and 17th level (4d4).
Unlike similar opinion-effecting spells like Friends and Charm Person, the wording of this spell doesn't finish with a caveat "when the spell ends, they will know you influenced them and it will piss them off", revealing that, it's the insults and not the subtle enchantments that will upset them.
Given this, my understanding of how the cantrip works is that you insult someone, using magical enchantments to boost the persuasiveness of your words. If they fail a wisdom saving throw, they take your words to heart, shading their next move with a veil of sadness, doubt, or fear clouding their judgment. As your words sting, they take minute psychic damage.
If that's the case then, I'm curious to know what would happen if your character tried lacing the same subtle enchantments while attempting other feats of persuasion?
Would your words of endearment seem more authentic when using it to court a potential partner? Would your opinion seem more valid when using it to settle an argument? Would the opinion someone has of you become more likable when trying to dispel doubt in an argument? ... Or will everything sound like an insult?
Though I realize that this does not guarantee the character's desired outcome and the added effects can be negated if they succeed a wisdom saving throw, I'm wondering if it would be a way for a character to increase their chance for a favorable outcome without the other person feeling swindled or used in the end...
dnd-5e spells social-combat
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.4k486156
asked yesterday
Victor BVictor B
1,136223
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
For those curious, my understanding was based on the fact that the spell sounds like the bullying remarks to a depressed person. I didn't realize that psychic damage was actually fatal here.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
you may find rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/134159/… interesting, as it approaches the uniqueness of this particular spell from a somewhat different direction.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
yesterday
$begingroup$
@BenBarden I did read it before posting. Though I see the link, it's still focusing on the vicious part and I was curious about the "lace with enchantment" part. Again, I mistook psychic damage to be "mental trauma"
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Though I know that RAW states that Vicious Mockery is initiated through a "string of insults", my question is about what would happen if you used it elsewhere than a tavern brawl or the like.
As a reference, the cantrip Vicious Mockery is written as:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you
(though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom
saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on
the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
This spell's damage increases by 1d4 when you reach 5th level (2d4),
11th level (3d4), and 17th level (4d4).
Unlike similar opinion-effecting spells like Friends and Charm Person, the wording of this spell doesn't finish with a caveat "when the spell ends, they will know you influenced them and it will piss them off", revealing that, it's the insults and not the subtle enchantments that will upset them.
Given this, my understanding of how the cantrip works is that you insult someone, using magical enchantments to boost the persuasiveness of your words. If they fail a wisdom saving throw, they take your words to heart, shading their next move with a veil of sadness, doubt, or fear clouding their judgment. As your words sting, they take minute psychic damage.
If that's the case then, I'm curious to know what would happen if your character tried lacing the same subtle enchantments while attempting other feats of persuasion?
Would your words of endearment seem more authentic when using it to court a potential partner? Would your opinion seem more valid when using it to settle an argument? Would the opinion someone has of you become more likable when trying to dispel doubt in an argument? ... Or will everything sound like an insult?
Though I realize that this does not guarantee the character's desired outcome and the added effects can be negated if they succeed a wisdom saving throw, I'm wondering if it would be a way for a character to increase their chance for a favorable outcome without the other person feeling swindled or used in the end...
dnd-5e spells social-combat
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.4k486156
asked yesterday
Victor BVictor B
1,136223
$endgroup$
Though I know that RAW states that Vicious Mockery is initiated through a "string of insults", my question is about what would happen if you used it elsewhere than a tavern brawl or the like.
As a reference, the cantrip Vicious Mockery is written as:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you
(though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom
saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on
the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
This spell's damage increases by 1d4 when you reach 5th level (2d4),
11th level (3d4), and 17th level (4d4).
Unlike similar opinion-effecting spells like Friends and Charm Person, the wording of this spell doesn't finish with a caveat "when the spell ends, they will know you influenced them and it will piss them off", revealing that, it's the insults and not the subtle enchantments that will upset them.
Given this, my understanding of how the cantrip works is that you insult someone, using magical enchantments to boost the persuasiveness of your words. If they fail a wisdom saving throw, they take your words to heart, shading their next move with a veil of sadness, doubt, or fear clouding their judgment. As your words sting, they take minute psychic damage.
If that's the case then, I'm curious to know what would happen if your character tried lacing the same subtle enchantments while attempting other feats of persuasion?
Would your words of endearment seem more authentic when using it to court a potential partner? Would your opinion seem more valid when using it to settle an argument? Would the opinion someone has of you become more likable when trying to dispel doubt in an argument? ... Or will everything sound like an insult?
Though I realize that this does not guarantee the character's desired outcome and the added effects can be negated if they succeed a wisdom saving throw, I'm wondering if it would be a way for a character to increase their chance for a favorable outcome without the other person feeling swindled or used in the end...
dnd-5e spells social-combat
dnd-5e spells social-combat
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.4k486156
asked yesterday
Victor BVictor B
1,136223
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.4k486156
asked yesterday
Victor BVictor B
1,136223
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.4k486156
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.4k486156
edited yesterday
V2Blast
25.4k486156
25.4k486156
asked yesterday
Victor BVictor B
1,136223
asked yesterday
Victor BVictor B
1,136223
asked yesterday
Victor BVictor B
1,136223
1,136223
$begingroup$
For those curious, my understanding was based on the fact that the spell sounds like the bullying remarks to a depressed person. I didn't realize that psychic damage was actually fatal here.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
you may find rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/134159/… interesting, as it approaches the uniqueness of this particular spell from a somewhat different direction.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
yesterday
$begingroup$
@BenBarden I did read it before posting. Though I see the link, it's still focusing on the vicious part and I was curious about the "lace with enchantment" part. Again, I mistook psychic damage to be "mental trauma"
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
For those curious, my understanding was based on the fact that the spell sounds like the bullying remarks to a depressed person. I didn't realize that psychic damage was actually fatal here.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
you may find rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/134159/… interesting, as it approaches the uniqueness of this particular spell from a somewhat different direction.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
yesterday
$begingroup$
@BenBarden I did read it before posting. Though I see the link, it's still focusing on the vicious part and I was curious about the "lace with enchantment" part. Again, I mistook psychic damage to be "mental trauma"
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
$begingroup$
For those curious, my understanding was based on the fact that the spell sounds like the bullying remarks to a depressed person. I didn't realize that psychic damage was actually fatal here.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
$begingroup$
For those curious, my understanding was based on the fact that the spell sounds like the bullying remarks to a depressed person. I didn't realize that psychic damage was actually fatal here.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
you may find rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/134159/… interesting, as it approaches the uniqueness of this particular spell from a somewhat different direction.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
yesterday
$begingroup$
you may find rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/134159/… interesting, as it approaches the uniqueness of this particular spell from a somewhat different direction.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
yesterday
$begingroup$
@BenBarden I did read it before posting. Though I see the link, it's still focusing on the vicious part and I was curious about the "lace with enchantment" part. Again, I mistook psychic damage to be "mental trauma"
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
$begingroup$
@BenBarden I did read it before posting. Though I see the link, it's still focusing on the vicious part and I was curious about the "lace with enchantment" part. Again, I mistook psychic damage to be "mental trauma"
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, Vicious Mockery is not a charm
While vicious mockery is a spell from the school of Enchantment, none of its capabilities include charm effects or the charmed condition.
The spell itself is not an opinion-effecting spell - it is a damage and debuff spell. You can see this in the tags on dndbeyond and note that it does not carry the social tag.
Mechanically, the spell only does what it says, which is:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
These effects are not subtle. You have cast a spell, dealt psychic damage, and done something to make it more difficult for them to succeed on their next attack.
A possible way forward
This doesn't mean that a DM could let you use it in this way, but just that the general mechanics for it don't include it. If you did use this, and the target didn't fully engage in combat back, you may be able to pair it with a more social skill of intimidation, but that is going to be entirely up to the DM and wouldn't be that difference than threatening someone in general after hitting them with a melee or ranged attack.
Narrating effects
It's also important to consider the narration process. This is a highly personal piece, but I generally approach by narrating to support the mechanical effects. Narrating as a means of explaining may introduce more confusion than necessary and create misunderstandings of what a spell can do. Some caster classes, like the Bard, are limited in what spells they know. Stretching spell capabilities beyond that minimizes that limitation - but if that matters is highly table dependent and would be a creative use of a spell.
answered yesterday
NautArchNautArch
60.7k8217402
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm learning more and more. I didn't realize the social tag meant that.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@VictorB: I don't think D&D Beyond clearly defines how they apply their tags (they're a DDB thing only on their site, not a WotC thing from the books). But yeah, they tend to be used to indicate what kind of spell it is (e.g. crowd control) and/or what situations it's used in (e.g. utility, social).
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not in the way you want it to.
Vicious Mockery isn't just "influence them to be a bit demoralized". If you continue to viciously mock someone, you can literally kill them. It's not so much making your words extra-persuasive as it is using those words as a channel to assault their mind. Worth noting that Vicious Mockery outright requires line of sight. If you can't see the target, you can't affect them with the spell. At the same time, it doesn't require that they be able to understand you - just that they be able to hear you.
Further, and more specifically, in 5e, spells do what they say they do. This one tells you what it does. It inflicts psychic damage. It doesn't do things like persuading or flattering. That's not doing psychic damage, and therefore not what the spell does.
However, at least technically, yes, you can use Vicious Mockery to win arguments or gain favors. If you meet some ruffian accosting a helpless NPC, and engage them in impassioned debate, then you could use Vicious Mockery to deal psychic damage as you inform them of details of their parentage about which they were previously unaware. If they should happen to yield the floor to you and flee (perhaps because they did not wish to die from psychic damage) then you will have won that argument by default... and the poor innocent NPC in question (ears burning) might well feel that they owed you a favor or two.
answered yesterday
Ben BardenBen Barden
11.4k12865
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ah, that sounds violently intrusive. I guess I misunderstood the spell.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
6
$begingroup$
@VictorB Well it isn't called "Pleasant" Mockery now, is it?
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zibbobz no, but the spell sounds like the effects a depressed victim goes through when being bullied, though those words can't directly kill.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
8
$begingroup$
@VictorB Nope - It can definitely kill. You can, in fact, mock someone to death in 5e.
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["\$", "\$"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "122"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143655%2fcan-you-use-vicious-mockery-to-win-an-argument-or-gain-favours%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
No, Vicious Mockery is not a charm
While vicious mockery is a spell from the school of Enchantment, none of its capabilities include charm effects or the charmed condition.
The spell itself is not an opinion-effecting spell - it is a damage and debuff spell. You can see this in the tags on dndbeyond and note that it does not carry the social tag.
Mechanically, the spell only does what it says, which is:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
These effects are not subtle. You have cast a spell, dealt psychic damage, and done something to make it more difficult for them to succeed on their next attack.
A possible way forward
This doesn't mean that a DM could let you use it in this way, but just that the general mechanics for it don't include it. If you did use this, and the target didn't fully engage in combat back, you may be able to pair it with a more social skill of intimidation, but that is going to be entirely up to the DM and wouldn't be that difference than threatening someone in general after hitting them with a melee or ranged attack.
Narrating effects
It's also important to consider the narration process. This is a highly personal piece, but I generally approach by narrating to support the mechanical effects. Narrating as a means of explaining may introduce more confusion than necessary and create misunderstandings of what a spell can do. Some caster classes, like the Bard, are limited in what spells they know. Stretching spell capabilities beyond that minimizes that limitation - but if that matters is highly table dependent and would be a creative use of a spell.
answered yesterday
NautArchNautArch
60.7k8217402
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm learning more and more. I didn't realize the social tag meant that.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@VictorB: I don't think D&D Beyond clearly defines how they apply their tags (they're a DDB thing only on their site, not a WotC thing from the books). But yeah, they tend to be used to indicate what kind of spell it is (e.g. crowd control) and/or what situations it's used in (e.g. utility, social).
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, Vicious Mockery is not a charm
While vicious mockery is a spell from the school of Enchantment, none of its capabilities include charm effects or the charmed condition.
The spell itself is not an opinion-effecting spell - it is a damage and debuff spell. You can see this in the tags on dndbeyond and note that it does not carry the social tag.
Mechanically, the spell only does what it says, which is:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
These effects are not subtle. You have cast a spell, dealt psychic damage, and done something to make it more difficult for them to succeed on their next attack.
A possible way forward
This doesn't mean that a DM could let you use it in this way, but just that the general mechanics for it don't include it. If you did use this, and the target didn't fully engage in combat back, you may be able to pair it with a more social skill of intimidation, but that is going to be entirely up to the DM and wouldn't be that difference than threatening someone in general after hitting them with a melee or ranged attack.
Narrating effects
It's also important to consider the narration process. This is a highly personal piece, but I generally approach by narrating to support the mechanical effects. Narrating as a means of explaining may introduce more confusion than necessary and create misunderstandings of what a spell can do. Some caster classes, like the Bard, are limited in what spells they know. Stretching spell capabilities beyond that minimizes that limitation - but if that matters is highly table dependent and would be a creative use of a spell.
answered yesterday
NautArchNautArch
60.7k8217402
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I'm learning more and more. I didn't realize the social tag meant that.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@VictorB: I don't think D&D Beyond clearly defines how they apply their tags (they're a DDB thing only on their site, not a WotC thing from the books). But yeah, they tend to be used to indicate what kind of spell it is (e.g. crowd control) and/or what situations it's used in (e.g. utility, social).
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
No, Vicious Mockery is not a charm
While vicious mockery is a spell from the school of Enchantment, none of its capabilities include charm effects or the charmed condition.
The spell itself is not an opinion-effecting spell - it is a damage and debuff spell. You can see this in the tags on dndbeyond and note that it does not carry the social tag.
Mechanically, the spell only does what it says, which is:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
These effects are not subtle. You have cast a spell, dealt psychic damage, and done something to make it more difficult for them to succeed on their next attack.
A possible way forward
This doesn't mean that a DM could let you use it in this way, but just that the general mechanics for it don't include it. If you did use this, and the target didn't fully engage in combat back, you may be able to pair it with a more social skill of intimidation, but that is going to be entirely up to the DM and wouldn't be that difference than threatening someone in general after hitting them with a melee or ranged attack.
Narrating effects
It's also important to consider the narration process. This is a highly personal piece, but I generally approach by narrating to support the mechanical effects. Narrating as a means of explaining may introduce more confusion than necessary and create misunderstandings of what a spell can do. Some caster classes, like the Bard, are limited in what spells they know. Stretching spell capabilities beyond that minimizes that limitation - but if that matters is highly table dependent and would be a creative use of a spell.
answered yesterday
NautArchNautArch
60.7k8217402
$endgroup$
No, Vicious Mockery is not a charm
While vicious mockery is a spell from the school of Enchantment, none of its capabilities include charm effects or the charmed condition.
The spell itself is not an opinion-effecting spell - it is a damage and debuff spell. You can see this in the tags on dndbeyond and note that it does not carry the social tag.
Mechanically, the spell only does what it says, which is:
You unleash a string of insults laced with subtle enchantments at a creature you can see within range. If the target can hear you (though it need not understand you), it must succeed on a Wisdom saving throw or take 1d4 psychic damage and have disadvantage on the next attack roll it makes before the end of its next turn.
These effects are not subtle. You have cast a spell, dealt psychic damage, and done something to make it more difficult for them to succeed on their next attack.
A possible way forward
This doesn't mean that a DM could let you use it in this way, but just that the general mechanics for it don't include it. If you did use this, and the target didn't fully engage in combat back, you may be able to pair it with a more social skill of intimidation, but that is going to be entirely up to the DM and wouldn't be that difference than threatening someone in general after hitting them with a melee or ranged attack.
Narrating effects
It's also important to consider the narration process. This is a highly personal piece, but I generally approach by narrating to support the mechanical effects. Narrating as a means of explaining may introduce more confusion than necessary and create misunderstandings of what a spell can do. Some caster classes, like the Bard, are limited in what spells they know. Stretching spell capabilities beyond that minimizes that limitation - but if that matters is highly table dependent and would be a creative use of a spell.
answered yesterday
NautArchNautArch
60.7k8217402
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
NautArchNautArch
60.7k8217402
answered yesterday
NautArchNautArch
60.7k8217402
answered yesterday
NautArchNautArch
60.7k8217402
60.7k8217402
$begingroup$
I'm learning more and more. I didn't realize the social tag meant that.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@VictorB: I don't think D&D Beyond clearly defines how they apply their tags (they're a DDB thing only on their site, not a WotC thing from the books). But yeah, they tend to be used to indicate what kind of spell it is (e.g. crowd control) and/or what situations it's used in (e.g. utility, social).
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I'm learning more and more. I didn't realize the social tag meant that.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
@VictorB: I don't think D&D Beyond clearly defines how they apply their tags (they're a DDB thing only on their site, not a WotC thing from the books). But yeah, they tend to be used to indicate what kind of spell it is (e.g. crowd control) and/or what situations it's used in (e.g. utility, social).
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
$begingroup$
I'm learning more and more. I didn't realize the social tag meant that.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
$begingroup$
I'm learning more and more. I didn't realize the social tag meant that.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
@VictorB: I don't think D&D Beyond clearly defines how they apply their tags (they're a DDB thing only on their site, not a WotC thing from the books). But yeah, they tend to be used to indicate what kind of spell it is (e.g. crowd control) and/or what situations it's used in (e.g. utility, social).
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
$begingroup$
@VictorB: I don't think D&D Beyond clearly defines how they apply their tags (they're a DDB thing only on their site, not a WotC thing from the books). But yeah, they tend to be used to indicate what kind of spell it is (e.g. crowd control) and/or what situations it's used in (e.g. utility, social).
$endgroup$
– V2Blast
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not in the way you want it to.
Vicious Mockery isn't just "influence them to be a bit demoralized". If you continue to viciously mock someone, you can literally kill them. It's not so much making your words extra-persuasive as it is using those words as a channel to assault their mind. Worth noting that Vicious Mockery outright requires line of sight. If you can't see the target, you can't affect them with the spell. At the same time, it doesn't require that they be able to understand you - just that they be able to hear you.
Further, and more specifically, in 5e, spells do what they say they do. This one tells you what it does. It inflicts psychic damage. It doesn't do things like persuading or flattering. That's not doing psychic damage, and therefore not what the spell does.
However, at least technically, yes, you can use Vicious Mockery to win arguments or gain favors. If you meet some ruffian accosting a helpless NPC, and engage them in impassioned debate, then you could use Vicious Mockery to deal psychic damage as you inform them of details of their parentage about which they were previously unaware. If they should happen to yield the floor to you and flee (perhaps because they did not wish to die from psychic damage) then you will have won that argument by default... and the poor innocent NPC in question (ears burning) might well feel that they owed you a favor or two.
answered yesterday
Ben BardenBen Barden
11.4k12865
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ah, that sounds violently intrusive. I guess I misunderstood the spell.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
6
$begingroup$
@VictorB Well it isn't called "Pleasant" Mockery now, is it?
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zibbobz no, but the spell sounds like the effects a depressed victim goes through when being bullied, though those words can't directly kill.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
8
$begingroup$
@VictorB Nope - It can definitely kill. You can, in fact, mock someone to death in 5e.
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not in the way you want it to.
Vicious Mockery isn't just "influence them to be a bit demoralized". If you continue to viciously mock someone, you can literally kill them. It's not so much making your words extra-persuasive as it is using those words as a channel to assault their mind. Worth noting that Vicious Mockery outright requires line of sight. If you can't see the target, you can't affect them with the spell. At the same time, it doesn't require that they be able to understand you - just that they be able to hear you.
Further, and more specifically, in 5e, spells do what they say they do. This one tells you what it does. It inflicts psychic damage. It doesn't do things like persuading or flattering. That's not doing psychic damage, and therefore not what the spell does.
However, at least technically, yes, you can use Vicious Mockery to win arguments or gain favors. If you meet some ruffian accosting a helpless NPC, and engage them in impassioned debate, then you could use Vicious Mockery to deal psychic damage as you inform them of details of their parentage about which they were previously unaware. If they should happen to yield the floor to you and flee (perhaps because they did not wish to die from psychic damage) then you will have won that argument by default... and the poor innocent NPC in question (ears burning) might well feel that they owed you a favor or two.
answered yesterday
Ben BardenBen Barden
11.4k12865
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Ah, that sounds violently intrusive. I guess I misunderstood the spell.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
6
$begingroup$
@VictorB Well it isn't called "Pleasant" Mockery now, is it?
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zibbobz no, but the spell sounds like the effects a depressed victim goes through when being bullied, though those words can't directly kill.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
8
$begingroup$
@VictorB Nope - It can definitely kill. You can, in fact, mock someone to death in 5e.
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not in the way you want it to.
Vicious Mockery isn't just "influence them to be a bit demoralized". If you continue to viciously mock someone, you can literally kill them. It's not so much making your words extra-persuasive as it is using those words as a channel to assault their mind. Worth noting that Vicious Mockery outright requires line of sight. If you can't see the target, you can't affect them with the spell. At the same time, it doesn't require that they be able to understand you - just that they be able to hear you.
Further, and more specifically, in 5e, spells do what they say they do. This one tells you what it does. It inflicts psychic damage. It doesn't do things like persuading or flattering. That's not doing psychic damage, and therefore not what the spell does.
However, at least technically, yes, you can use Vicious Mockery to win arguments or gain favors. If you meet some ruffian accosting a helpless NPC, and engage them in impassioned debate, then you could use Vicious Mockery to deal psychic damage as you inform them of details of their parentage about which they were previously unaware. If they should happen to yield the floor to you and flee (perhaps because they did not wish to die from psychic damage) then you will have won that argument by default... and the poor innocent NPC in question (ears burning) might well feel that they owed you a favor or two.
answered yesterday
Ben BardenBen Barden
11.4k12865
$endgroup$
Not in the way you want it to.
Vicious Mockery isn't just "influence them to be a bit demoralized". If you continue to viciously mock someone, you can literally kill them. It's not so much making your words extra-persuasive as it is using those words as a channel to assault their mind. Worth noting that Vicious Mockery outright requires line of sight. If you can't see the target, you can't affect them with the spell. At the same time, it doesn't require that they be able to understand you - just that they be able to hear you.
Further, and more specifically, in 5e, spells do what they say they do. This one tells you what it does. It inflicts psychic damage. It doesn't do things like persuading or flattering. That's not doing psychic damage, and therefore not what the spell does.
However, at least technically, yes, you can use Vicious Mockery to win arguments or gain favors. If you meet some ruffian accosting a helpless NPC, and engage them in impassioned debate, then you could use Vicious Mockery to deal psychic damage as you inform them of details of their parentage about which they were previously unaware. If they should happen to yield the floor to you and flee (perhaps because they did not wish to die from psychic damage) then you will have won that argument by default... and the poor innocent NPC in question (ears burning) might well feel that they owed you a favor or two.
answered yesterday
Ben BardenBen Barden
11.4k12865
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
Ben BardenBen Barden
11.4k12865
answered yesterday
Ben BardenBen Barden
11.4k12865
answered yesterday
Ben BardenBen Barden
11.4k12865
11.4k12865
$begingroup$
Ah, that sounds violently intrusive. I guess I misunderstood the spell.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
6
$begingroup$
@VictorB Well it isn't called "Pleasant" Mockery now, is it?
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zibbobz no, but the spell sounds like the effects a depressed victim goes through when being bullied, though those words can't directly kill.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
8
$begingroup$
@VictorB Nope - It can definitely kill. You can, in fact, mock someone to death in 5e.
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Ah, that sounds violently intrusive. I guess I misunderstood the spell.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
6
$begingroup$
@VictorB Well it isn't called "Pleasant" Mockery now, is it?
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zibbobz no, but the spell sounds like the effects a depressed victim goes through when being bullied, though those words can't directly kill.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
8
$begingroup$
@VictorB Nope - It can definitely kill. You can, in fact, mock someone to death in 5e.
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
Ah, that sounds violently intrusive. I guess I misunderstood the spell.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
$begingroup$
Ah, that sounds violently intrusive. I guess I misunderstood the spell.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
6
6
$begingroup$
@VictorB Well it isn't called "Pleasant" Mockery now, is it?
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
@VictorB Well it isn't called "Pleasant" Mockery now, is it?
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zibbobz no, but the spell sounds like the effects a depressed victim goes through when being bullied, though those words can't directly kill.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
$begingroup$
@Zibbobz no, but the spell sounds like the effects a depressed victim goes through when being bullied, though those words can't directly kill.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
8
8
$begingroup$
@VictorB Nope - It can definitely kill. You can, in fact, mock someone to death in 5e.
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
$begingroup$
@VictorB Nope - It can definitely kill. You can, in fact, mock someone to death in 5e.
$endgroup$
– Zibbobz
yesterday
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f143655%2fcan-you-use-vicious-mockery-to-win-an-argument-or-gain-favours%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
For those curious, my understanding was based on the fact that the spell sounds like the bullying remarks to a depressed person. I didn't realize that psychic damage was actually fatal here.
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday
1
$begingroup$
you may find rpg.stackexchange.com/questions/134159/… interesting, as it approaches the uniqueness of this particular spell from a somewhat different direction.
$endgroup$
– Ben Barden
yesterday
$begingroup$
@BenBarden I did read it before posting. Though I see the link, it's still focusing on the vicious part and I was curious about the "lace with enchantment" part. Again, I mistook psychic damage to be "mental trauma"
$endgroup$
– Victor B
yesterday