If $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$, then it must be dense in $Bbb R$.Defining dense subsets of $mathbbR$Why aren't all dense subsets of $mathbbR$ uncountable?Show that $S=fracp2^i: pinBbb Z, i in Bbb N $ is dense in $Bbb R$.Characterization of dense open subsets of the real numbersProof of the infinitude of rational and irrational numbersMust a comeager set be dense?countable dense subset of R^kIf A is dense in (X,T) and A = the countable intersection of open sets in X, then each open set is denseGiven that the rationals are countable and the denseness of $mathbbQ$ in $mathbbR$ how can $mathbbR$ be uncountable?prove that $mathbbQ^n$is dense subset of $mathbbR^n$

What is going on with gets(stdin) on the site coderbyte?

Taxes on Dividends in a Roth IRA

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced

What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

Can I turn my anal-retentiveness into a career?

Stack Interview Code methods made from class Node and Smart Pointers

What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?

US tourist/student visa

Find the next value of this number series

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

What fields between the rationals and the reals allow a good notion of 2D distance?

Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting soon, especially given that a colleague just left this week

Does grappling negate Mirror Image?

Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?

"before" and "want" for the same systemd service?

Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?

C++ copy constructor called at return

What is Cash Advance APR?

Why should universal income be universal?

Is a Java collection guaranteed to be in a valid, usable state after a ConcurrentModificationException?



If $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$, then it must be dense in $Bbb R$.


Defining dense subsets of $mathbbR$Why aren't all dense subsets of $mathbbR$ uncountable?Show that $S=fracp2^i: pinBbb Z, i in Bbb N $ is dense in $Bbb R$.Characterization of dense open subsets of the real numbersProof of the infinitude of rational and irrational numbersMust a comeager set be dense?countable dense subset of R^kIf A is dense in (X,T) and A = the countable intersection of open sets in X, then each open set is denseGiven that the rationals are countable and the denseness of $mathbbQ$ in $mathbbR$ how can $mathbbR$ be uncountable?prove that $mathbbQ^n$is dense subset of $mathbbR^n$













9












$begingroup$


I have $A$ is a subset of $mathbbR$. If $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$, then it must be dense in $mathbbR$. I am confused because $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$. Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number? I understand for anything to be dense in $Bbb R$, there must exist something that lies between any two real numbers. However, how does knowing something is dense in $mathbbQ$ prove that it must be dense in the reals? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
    $endgroup$
    – user334732
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
    $endgroup$
    – user334732
    yesterday
















9












$begingroup$


I have $A$ is a subset of $mathbbR$. If $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$, then it must be dense in $mathbbR$. I am confused because $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$. Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number? I understand for anything to be dense in $Bbb R$, there must exist something that lies between any two real numbers. However, how does knowing something is dense in $mathbbQ$ prove that it must be dense in the reals? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
    $endgroup$
    – user334732
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
    $endgroup$
    – user334732
    yesterday














9












9








9


1



$begingroup$


I have $A$ is a subset of $mathbbR$. If $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$, then it must be dense in $mathbbR$. I am confused because $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$. Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number? I understand for anything to be dense in $Bbb R$, there must exist something that lies between any two real numbers. However, how does knowing something is dense in $mathbbQ$ prove that it must be dense in the reals? Any help is appreciated.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




I have $A$ is a subset of $mathbbR$. If $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$, then it must be dense in $mathbbR$. I am confused because $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$. Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number? I understand for anything to be dense in $Bbb R$, there must exist something that lies between any two real numbers. However, how does knowing something is dense in $mathbbQ$ prove that it must be dense in the reals? Any help is appreciated.







real-analysis real-numbers






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 23 hours ago









Parcly Taxel

44.7k1376109




44.7k1376109






New contributor




Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Priti DPriti D

462




462




New contributor




Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Priti D is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











  • $begingroup$
    Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
    $endgroup$
    – user334732
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
    $endgroup$
    – user334732
    yesterday

















  • $begingroup$
    Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
    $endgroup$
    – user334732
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
    $endgroup$
    – user334732
    yesterday
















$begingroup$
Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday




$begingroup$
Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday












$begingroup$
And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday





$begingroup$
And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday











6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

$A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.



We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
    $endgroup$
    – CiaPan
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    :) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
    $endgroup$
    – CiaPan
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    yesterday



















6












$begingroup$

Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
    $endgroup$
    – Mason
    yesterday











  • $begingroup$
    This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
    $endgroup$
    – Dbchatto67
    yesterday



















1












$begingroup$


Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?




Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    @RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
    $endgroup$
    – David Richerby
    yesterday


















0












$begingroup$

Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.



Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
$$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$




Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.




Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
Then for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
consluding the proof.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    0












    $begingroup$

    Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.



    Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.



    It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$




















      0












      $begingroup$

      There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.



      To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$












        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "69"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: true,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: 10,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155595%2fif-a-is-dense-in-bbb-q-then-it-must-be-dense-in-bbb-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        7












        $begingroup$

        $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.



        We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
          $endgroup$
          – CiaPan
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          @CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          :) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
          $endgroup$
          – CiaPan
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday
















        7












        $begingroup$

        $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.



        We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$








        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
          $endgroup$
          – CiaPan
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          @CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          :) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
          $endgroup$
          – CiaPan
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday














        7












        7








        7





        $begingroup$

        $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.



        We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.



        We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered yesterday









        MasonMason

        1,7951630




        1,7951630







        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
          $endgroup$
          – CiaPan
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          @CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          :) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
          $endgroup$
          – CiaPan
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday













        • 1




          $begingroup$
          Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
          $endgroup$
          – CiaPan
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          @CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          :) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
          $endgroup$
          – CiaPan
          yesterday










        • $begingroup$
          I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday








        1




        1




        $begingroup$
        Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
        $endgroup$
        – CiaPan
        yesterday




        $begingroup$
        Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
        $endgroup$
        – CiaPan
        yesterday












        $begingroup$
        @CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        yesterday




        $begingroup$
        @CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        yesterday












        $begingroup$
        :) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
        $endgroup$
        – CiaPan
        yesterday




        $begingroup$
        :) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
        $endgroup$
        – CiaPan
        yesterday












        $begingroup$
        I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        yesterday





        $begingroup$
        I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        yesterday












        6












        $begingroup$

        Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 2




          $begingroup$
          Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday











        • $begingroup$
          This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
          $endgroup$
          – Dbchatto67
          yesterday
















        6












        $begingroup$

        Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 2




          $begingroup$
          Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday











        • $begingroup$
          This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
          $endgroup$
          – Dbchatto67
          yesterday














        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Dbchatto67Dbchatto67

        2,028319




        2,028319







        • 2




          $begingroup$
          Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday











        • $begingroup$
          This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
          $endgroup$
          – Dbchatto67
          yesterday













        • 2




          $begingroup$
          Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
          $endgroup$
          – Mason
          yesterday











        • $begingroup$
          This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
          $endgroup$
          – Dbchatto67
          yesterday








        2




        2




        $begingroup$
        Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        yesterday





        $begingroup$
        Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
        $endgroup$
        – Mason
        yesterday













        $begingroup$
        This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
        $endgroup$
        – Dbchatto67
        yesterday





        $begingroup$
        This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
        $endgroup$
        – Dbchatto67
        yesterday












        1












        $begingroup$


        Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?




        Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          @RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – David Richerby
          yesterday















        1












        $begingroup$


        Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?




        Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$












        • $begingroup$
          @RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – David Richerby
          yesterday













        1












        1








        1





        $begingroup$


        Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?




        Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$




        Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?




        Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.







        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited yesterday

























        answered yesterday









        David RicherbyDavid Richerby

        2,25511324




        2,25511324











        • $begingroup$
          @RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – David Richerby
          yesterday
















        • $begingroup$
          @RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
          $endgroup$
          – David Richerby
          yesterday















        $begingroup$
        @RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
        $endgroup$
        – David Richerby
        yesterday




        $begingroup$
        @RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
        $endgroup$
        – David Richerby
        yesterday











        0












        $begingroup$

        Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.



        Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
        $$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$




        Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.




        Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
        $$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
        Then for each $nge N$ we have
        $$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
        consluding the proof.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          0












          $begingroup$

          Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.



          Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
          $$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$




          Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.




          Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
          $$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
          Then for each $nge N$ we have
          $$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
          consluding the proof.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.



            Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
            $$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$




            Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.




            Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
            $$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
            Then for each $nge N$ we have
            $$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
            consluding the proof.






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.



            Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
            $$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$




            Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.




            Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
            $$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
            Then for each $nge N$ we have
            $$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
            consluding the proof.







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered yesterday









            Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud

            20.5k33797




            20.5k33797





















                0












                $begingroup$

                Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.



                Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.



                It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$

















                  0












                  $begingroup$

                  Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.



                  Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.



                  It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$















                    0












                    0








                    0





                    $begingroup$

                    Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.



                    Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.



                    It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.






                    share|cite|improve this answer









                    $endgroup$



                    Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.



                    Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.



                    It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.







                    share|cite|improve this answer












                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer










                    answered yesterday









                    AcccumulationAcccumulation

                    7,1352619




                    7,1352619





















                        0












                        $begingroup$

                        There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.



                        To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          0












                          $begingroup$

                          There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.



                          To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            0












                            0








                            0





                            $begingroup$

                            There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.



                            To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.



                            To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered yesterday









                            bitesizebobitesizebo

                            1,59618




                            1,59618




















                                Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155595%2fif-a-is-dense-in-bbb-q-then-it-must-be-dense-in-bbb-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                                NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

                                대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495