If $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$, then it must be dense in $Bbb R$.Defining dense subsets of $mathbbR$Why aren't all dense subsets of $mathbbR$ uncountable?Show that $S=fracp2^i: pinBbb Z, i in Bbb N $ is dense in $Bbb R$.Characterization of dense open subsets of the real numbersProof of the infinitude of rational and irrational numbersMust a comeager set be dense?countable dense subset of R^kIf A is dense in (X,T) and A = the countable intersection of open sets in X, then each open set is denseGiven that the rationals are countable and the denseness of $mathbbQ$ in $mathbbR$ how can $mathbbR$ be uncountable?prove that $mathbbQ^n$is dense subset of $mathbbR^n$
What is going on with gets(stdin) on the site coderbyte?
Taxes on Dividends in a Roth IRA
Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced
What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?
Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?
Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?
Can I turn my anal-retentiveness into a career?
Stack Interview Code methods made from class Node and Smart Pointers
What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?
US tourist/student visa
Find the next value of this number series
Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?
What fields between the rationals and the reals allow a good notion of 2D distance?
Has the laser at Magurele, Romania reached a tenth of the Sun's power?
What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)
How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting soon, especially given that a colleague just left this week
Does grappling negate Mirror Image?
Is this toilet slogan correct usage of the English language?
"before" and "want" for the same systemd service?
Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?
C++ copy constructor called at return
What is Cash Advance APR?
Why should universal income be universal?
Is a Java collection guaranteed to be in a valid, usable state after a ConcurrentModificationException?
If $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$, then it must be dense in $Bbb R$.
Defining dense subsets of $mathbbR$Why aren't all dense subsets of $mathbbR$ uncountable?Show that $S=fracp2^i: pinBbb Z, i in Bbb N $ is dense in $Bbb R$.Characterization of dense open subsets of the real numbersProof of the infinitude of rational and irrational numbersMust a comeager set be dense?countable dense subset of R^kIf A is dense in (X,T) and A = the countable intersection of open sets in X, then each open set is denseGiven that the rationals are countable and the denseness of $mathbbQ$ in $mathbbR$ how can $mathbbR$ be uncountable?prove that $mathbbQ^n$is dense subset of $mathbbR^n$
$begingroup$
I have $A$ is a subset of $mathbbR$. If $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$, then it must be dense in $mathbbR$. I am confused because $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$. Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number? I understand for anything to be dense in $Bbb R$, there must exist something that lies between any two real numbers. However, how does knowing something is dense in $mathbbQ$ prove that it must be dense in the reals? Any help is appreciated.
real-analysis real-numbers
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have $A$ is a subset of $mathbbR$. If $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$, then it must be dense in $mathbbR$. I am confused because $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$. Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number? I understand for anything to be dense in $Bbb R$, there must exist something that lies between any two real numbers. However, how does knowing something is dense in $mathbbQ$ prove that it must be dense in the reals? Any help is appreciated.
real-analysis real-numbers
New contributor
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
$begingroup$
And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have $A$ is a subset of $mathbbR$. If $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$, then it must be dense in $mathbbR$. I am confused because $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$. Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number? I understand for anything to be dense in $Bbb R$, there must exist something that lies between any two real numbers. However, how does knowing something is dense in $mathbbQ$ prove that it must be dense in the reals? Any help is appreciated.
real-analysis real-numbers
New contributor
$endgroup$
I have $A$ is a subset of $mathbbR$. If $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$, then it must be dense in $mathbbR$. I am confused because $A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$. Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number? I understand for anything to be dense in $Bbb R$, there must exist something that lies between any two real numbers. However, how does knowing something is dense in $mathbbQ$ prove that it must be dense in the reals? Any help is appreciated.
real-analysis real-numbers
real-analysis real-numbers
New contributor
New contributor
edited 23 hours ago
Parcly Taxel
44.7k1376109
44.7k1376109
New contributor
asked yesterday
Priti DPriti D
462
462
New contributor
New contributor
$begingroup$
Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
$begingroup$
And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
$begingroup$
And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
$begingroup$
Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
$begingroup$
Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
$begingroup$
And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
$begingroup$
And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.
We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
@CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
:) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?
Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.
Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
$$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$
Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.
Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
Then for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
consluding the proof.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.
Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.
It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.
To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155595%2fif-a-is-dense-in-bbb-q-then-it-must-be-dense-in-bbb-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
$A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.
We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
@CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
:) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.
We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
@CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
:) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
$A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.
We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$
$endgroup$
$A$ is dense in $mathbbQ$ if for any two rationals $q_1 < q_2$ there is some $ain A cap mathbbQ$ such that $q_1<a<q_2$. The dyadic rationals would be an example. Here is the way to think about the puzzle of nested dense sets. If you give me two reals $r_1$ and $r_2$ can I find a $q_1$ in between them? Yes. Why? because $mathbbQ$ is dense is $mathbbR$. Can I find two values? $q_1$ and $q_2$ in between $r_1$ and $r_2$? Because if I could find two... then I could exploit the density of $mathbbQ$ to finish the job.
We are given two reals and then we find $q_1,q_2$ inbetween the reals and then we find some $ain A$ inbetween these rationals. All told we have the following inequality: $$r_1<q_1<a<q_2<r_2$$
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
MasonMason
1,7951630
1,7951630
1
$begingroup$
Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
@CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
:) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
@CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
:) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
1
1
$begingroup$
Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
Isn't it 'for any two $q_1, q_2 in mathbb Q$ there exists $ain Acolorredcapmathbb Q$ such that $q_1 < a < q_2$' ...? (Plus, of course, an assumption of $q_1<q_2.$)
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
@CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
@CiaPan. I think you are right. This was written hastily.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
:) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
:) I'm not familiar with the definition, but I thought about irrationals – they are certainly dense in reals, but I would hesitate to accept they are dense in rationals, which would fit your former formulation. Hence the red part.
$endgroup$
– CiaPan
yesterday
$begingroup$
I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
I don't think that it would have fit because I defined it as a subset. So it would read "the irrational reals are dense in the rationals if (1) they are a subset of the rationals and (2) there is an irrational between any two rationals." So it wouldn't meet the (1)st criteria. So we might be dancing around equivalent or similar variations on the same concept.
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$
$endgroup$
2
$begingroup$
Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$
$endgroup$
Since $A$ is dense in $Bbb Q$ so $overline A cap Bbb Q = Bbb Q subseteq overline A.$ So $Bbb R = overline Bbb Q subseteq overline A subseteq Bbb R.$ Therefore $overline A = Bbb R.$ This shows that $A$ is dense in $Bbb R.$
answered yesterday
Dbchatto67Dbchatto67
2,028319
2,028319
2
$begingroup$
Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
yesterday
add a comment |
2
$begingroup$
Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
yesterday
2
2
$begingroup$
Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
Looks good to me. I would add the line: Where $A$ overbar refers to the closure of a set. It's unclear to me whether the OP is familiar with this expression so maybe a link to? mathworld.wolfram.com/SetClosure.html. +1
$endgroup$
– Mason
yesterday
$begingroup$
This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
yesterday
$begingroup$
This is true for any arbitrary metric space @Mason. Let $(X,d)$ be a metric space. Let $Y$ be metric subspace of $X.$ Let $A subseteq X.$ Then the closure of $A$ in $Y$ say $overline A^Y = overline A cap Y,$ where $overline A$ is the closure of $A$ in $X.$
$endgroup$
– Dbchatto67
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?
Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?
Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
@RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?
Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.
$endgroup$
Does that imply that between any two rational numbers, there exists a real number?
Well, if $a$ and $b$ are distinct rationals, then $(a+b)/2$ is a real number that's between them. It's also rational. And, if you want an irrational number that's between them, take something like $a+(b-a)/sqrt2$.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
David RicherbyDavid Richerby
2,25511324
2,25511324
$begingroup$
@RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
@RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
$begingroup$
@RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
$begingroup$
@RingØ Or $a=b=mathrmanything$. Edited to add the necessary "distinct". Thanks!
$endgroup$
– David Richerby
yesterday
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.
Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
$$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$
Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.
Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
Then for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
consluding the proof.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.
Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
$$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$
Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.
Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
Then for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
consluding the proof.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.
Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
$$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$
Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.
Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
Then for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
consluding the proof.
$endgroup$
Another proof. $A$ being dense in $mathbbQ$ means that for any $qinmathbbQ$ there is a sequence in $A$ converging to $q$.
Let $rinmathbbR$. Since $mathbbQ$ is dense in $mathbbR$, there is a sequence $q_n_n=1^infty$ converging to $r$. For each $n$, pick a sequence $a_n,i_i=1^infty$ in $A$ converging to $q_n$. For each $n$, choose $k_n$ such that for all $ige k_n$ we have
$$|a_n,i-q_n|<2^-n.$$
Claim: The sequence $a_n,k_n_n=1^infty$ converges to $r$.
Proof: Let $epsilon>0$. Choose $N$ such that for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-q_n|<fracepsilon2qquadtextandqquad2^-N<fracepsilon2 .$$
Then for each $nge N$ we have
$$|r-a_n,k_n|le|r-q_n|+|q_n-a_n,k_n|<epsilon ,$$
consluding the proof.
answered yesterday
Daniel Robert-NicoudDaniel Robert-Nicoud
20.5k33797
20.5k33797
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.
Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.
It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.
Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.
It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.
Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.
It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.
$endgroup$
Another definition of "dense" is that every open neighborhood of $mathbb Q$ has a member of $A$. And using that definition, we want to prove that every open neighborhood of $mathbb R$ has a member of $A$. So suppose we take a neighborhood $N_1$ of $r$ in $mathbb R$. Since $mathbb Q$ is dense in $mathbb R$, there is rational $q$ in $N_1$. We can take a neighborhood $N_2$ of $q$ that is a subset of $N_1$, and there will be $a$ in that neighborhood, and thus $a$ will be in $N_1$ as well.
Basically, $A$ being dense in $mathbb Q$ means that for every $q$, there is $a$ "close" to $q$, and $mathbb Q$ being dense in $mathbb R$ means that for every $r$, there is $q$ "close" to $r$. So given any $r$, we take $q$ "close" to $r$, then we take $a$ "close" to $q$, and $a$ is "close" to $r$.
It's analogous to "If everyone lives close to a school, and every school is close to library, then everyone lives close to a library.", although there's some additional rigor regarding the term "close" that has to be introduced.
answered yesterday
AcccumulationAcccumulation
7,1352619
7,1352619
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.
To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.
To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.
To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.
$endgroup$
There is a more general statement of this theorem. Let $X$ be a topological space and suppose $Z subset Y subset X$. If $Y$ is dense in $X$ and $Z$ is dense in $Y$ (w.r.t. the subset topology) then $Z$ is dense in $X$.
To prove this, suppose $Z$ is not dense in $X$. Then there exists $A$ open and non-empty in $X$ such that $Z cap A = emptyset$. Then we have two cases depending on if $A' = Y cap A$ is non-empty. If $A'$ is empty then $A cap Y = emptyset$ therefore $Y$ is not dense in $X$. Else $A'$ is non-empty and open in $Y$ w.r.t. the subset topology, and $A' cap Z = emptyset$. Hence $Z$ is not dense in $Y$. Either way we have a contradiction.
answered yesterday
bitesizebobitesizebo
1,59618
1,59618
add a comment |
add a comment |
Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Priti D is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3155595%2fif-a-is-dense-in-bbb-q-then-it-must-be-dense-in-bbb-r%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
Not a proof, but it may help you to understand what's going on. For any pair of distinct real numbers, and any $a$ in-between, there is always a pair of rational numbers that also straddles $a$ and is also in-between the pair of real numbers. In fact there are infinitely many.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday
$begingroup$
And yes, there is always an irrational real number between any pair of rational numbers. In fact there is an uncountable infinity of them.
$endgroup$
– user334732
yesterday