Pipe each batch of xargs trough wc -l2019 Community Moderator Electionfind arcana: can't get pipe to work in -exec lineIs there any way to use xargs across a pipe?'Tar' the result of a 'find', preserving the directory structureSearch a String in a directory- Get output without filenamePiping commands after a piped xargsSending a list (text file) of files and pathnames to xargsxargs and line-by-line pipeCan a pipe be used instead of exec in - find / -name “.txt” -exec cp /junk ;Skip first line from output of each iteration of XARGSSave in a file first 7 file in the directory /bin that starts with c

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?

How much of a Devil Fruit must be consumed to gain the power?

Were Persian-Median kings illiterate?

Multiplicative persistence

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

What fields between the rationals and the reals allow a good notion of 2D distance?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

Biological Blimps: Propulsion

Fantasy comedy romance novel, set in medieval times, involving a siege, a nun, and enchanted pickles

Why does this expression simplify as such?

What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

US tourist/student visa

Doesn't the system of the Supreme Court oppose justice?

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

How can I write humor as character trait?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced



Pipe each batch of xargs trough wc -l



2019 Community Moderator Electionfind arcana: can't get pipe to work in -exec lineIs there any way to use xargs across a pipe?'Tar' the result of a 'find', preserving the directory structureSearch a String in a directory- Get output without filenamePiping commands after a piped xargsSending a list (text file) of files and pathnames to xargsxargs and line-by-line pipeCan a pipe be used instead of exec in - find / -name “.txt” -exec cp /junk ;Skip first line from output of each iteration of XARGSSave in a file first 7 file in the directory /bin that starts with c










-1















So my task is to find the file with the most hardlinks in a directory.
So far i have :



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile 


which gives me:



./hardlinkFIle245
./hardlinkFIle23
./hardlinkFIle2
./file2.txt
./hardlinkFIle1234
./hardlinkFIle123
./hardlinkFIle12
./hardlinkFIle1
./file1.txt


Now when I pipe it in with |wc -l, I get the total number of lines 9:



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile | wc -l


What I want is for each xargs batch -n 1 to give me the count :
so i want:



4
5









share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

    – steeldriver
    yesterday











  • Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

    – Goking
    16 hours ago












  • Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

    – steeldriver
    15 hours ago











  • The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

    – Goking
    14 hours ago











  • Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

    – Goking
    14 hours ago















-1















So my task is to find the file with the most hardlinks in a directory.
So far i have :



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile 


which gives me:



./hardlinkFIle245
./hardlinkFIle23
./hardlinkFIle2
./file2.txt
./hardlinkFIle1234
./hardlinkFIle123
./hardlinkFIle12
./hardlinkFIle1
./file1.txt


Now when I pipe it in with |wc -l, I get the total number of lines 9:



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile | wc -l


What I want is for each xargs batch -n 1 to give me the count :
so i want:



4
5









share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

    – steeldriver
    yesterday











  • Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

    – Goking
    16 hours ago












  • Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

    – steeldriver
    15 hours ago











  • The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

    – Goking
    14 hours ago











  • Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

    – Goking
    14 hours ago













-1












-1








-1








So my task is to find the file with the most hardlinks in a directory.
So far i have :



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile 


which gives me:



./hardlinkFIle245
./hardlinkFIle23
./hardlinkFIle2
./file2.txt
./hardlinkFIle1234
./hardlinkFIle123
./hardlinkFIle12
./hardlinkFIle1
./file1.txt


Now when I pipe it in with |wc -l, I get the total number of lines 9:



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile | wc -l


What I want is for each xargs batch -n 1 to give me the count :
so i want:



4
5









share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












So my task is to find the file with the most hardlinks in a directory.
So far i have :



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile 


which gives me:



./hardlinkFIle245
./hardlinkFIle23
./hardlinkFIle2
./file2.txt
./hardlinkFIle1234
./hardlinkFIle123
./hardlinkFIle12
./hardlinkFIle1
./file1.txt


Now when I pipe it in with |wc -l, I get the total number of lines 9:



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile | wc -l


What I want is for each xargs batch -n 1 to give me the count :
so i want:



4
5






linux find pipe xargs






share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









Stéphane Chazelas

311k57586945




311k57586945






New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









GokingGoking

1




1




New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

    – steeldriver
    yesterday











  • Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

    – Goking
    16 hours ago












  • Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

    – steeldriver
    15 hours ago











  • The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

    – Goking
    14 hours ago











  • Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

    – Goking
    14 hours ago

















  • Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

    – steeldriver
    yesterday











  • Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

    – Goking
    16 hours ago












  • Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

    – steeldriver
    15 hours ago











  • The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

    – Goking
    14 hours ago











  • Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

    – Goking
    14 hours ago
















Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

– steeldriver
yesterday





Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

– steeldriver
yesterday













Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

– Goking
16 hours ago






Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

– Goking
16 hours ago














Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

– steeldriver
15 hours ago





Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

– steeldriver
15 hours ago













The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

– Goking
14 hours ago





The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

– Goking
14 hours ago













Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

– Goking
14 hours ago





Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

– Goking
14 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

inode = $0
getline file

++count[inode] >= max
files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
max = count[inode]
max_inode = inode

END
printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
'


Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.






share|improve this answer
































    2














    You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



    find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


    Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



    Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



    You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



    find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
    for file do
    printf "%sn" "$file"
    find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
    done' find-sh +





    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "106"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507553%2fpipe-each-batch-of-xargs-trough-wc-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



      find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


      Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



      If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



      find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

      inode = $0
      getline file

      ++count[inode] >= max
      files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
      max = count[inode]
      max_inode = inode

      END
      printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
      '


      Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.






      share|improve this answer





























        2














        If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



        find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


        Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



        If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



        find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

        inode = $0
        getline file

        ++count[inode] >= max
        files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
        max = count[inode]
        max_inode = inode

        END
        printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
        '


        Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.






        share|improve this answer



























          2












          2








          2







          If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



          find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


          Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



          If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



          find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

          inode = $0
          getline file

          ++count[inode] >= max
          files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
          max = count[inode]
          max_inode = inode

          END
          printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
          '


          Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.






          share|improve this answer















          If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



          find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


          Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



          If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



          find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

          inode = $0
          getline file

          ++count[inode] >= max
          files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
          max = count[inode]
          max_inode = inode

          END
          printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
          '


          Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 11 hours ago

























          answered 11 hours ago









          Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas

          311k57586945




          311k57586945























              2














              You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



              find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


              Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



              Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



              You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



              find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
              for file do
              printf "%sn" "$file"
              find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
              done' find-sh +





              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                2














                You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



                find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


                Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



                Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



                You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



                find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
                for file do
                printf "%sn" "$file"
                find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
                done' find-sh +





                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                  2












                  2








                  2







                  You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



                  find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


                  Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



                  Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



                  You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



                  find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
                  for file do
                  printf "%sn" "$file"
                  find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
                  done' find-sh +





                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



                  find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


                  Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



                  Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



                  You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



                  find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
                  for file do
                  printf "%sn" "$file"
                  find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
                  done' find-sh +






                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 10 hours ago









                  Stéphane Chazelas

                  311k57586945




                  311k57586945






                  New contributor




                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered yesterday









                  Entropy0Entropy0

                  562




                  562




                  New contributor




                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507553%2fpipe-each-batch-of-xargs-trough-wc-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                      NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

                      대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495