Pipe each batch of xargs trough wc -l2019 Community Moderator Electionfind arcana: can't get pipe to work in -exec lineIs there any way to use xargs across a pipe?'Tar' the result of a 'find', preserving the directory structureSearch a String in a directory- Get output without filenamePiping commands after a piped xargsSending a list (text file) of files and pathnames to xargsxargs and line-by-line pipeCan a pipe be used instead of exec in - find / -name “.txt” -exec cp /junk ;Skip first line from output of each iteration of XARGSSave in a file first 7 file in the directory /bin that starts with c

What's the name of the logical fallacy where a debater extends a statement far beyond the original statement to make it true?

Is it allowed to activate the ability of multiple planeswalkers in a single turn?

I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?

How much of a Devil Fruit must be consumed to gain the power?

Were Persian-Median kings illiterate?

Multiplicative persistence

When were female captains banned from Starfleet?

What fields between the rationals and the reals allow a good notion of 2D distance?

How to explain what's wrong with this application of the chain rule?

Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

Biological Blimps: Propulsion

Fantasy comedy romance novel, set in medieval times, involving a siege, a nun, and enchanted pickles

Why does this expression simplify as such?

What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

How to make money from a browser who sees 5 seconds into the future of any web page?

Can I say "fingers" when referring to toes?

US tourist/student visa

Doesn't the system of the Supreme Court oppose justice?

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

How can I write humor as character trait?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced



Pipe each batch of xargs trough wc -l



2019 Community Moderator Electionfind arcana: can't get pipe to work in -exec lineIs there any way to use xargs across a pipe?'Tar' the result of a 'find', preserving the directory structureSearch a String in a directory- Get output without filenamePiping commands after a piped xargsSending a list (text file) of files and pathnames to xargsxargs and line-by-line pipeCan a pipe be used instead of exec in - find / -name “.txt” -exec cp /junk ;Skip first line from output of each iteration of XARGSSave in a file first 7 file in the directory /bin that starts with c










-1















So my task is to find the file with the most hardlinks in a directory.
So far i have :



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile 


which gives me:



./hardlinkFIle245
./hardlinkFIle23
./hardlinkFIle2
./file2.txt
./hardlinkFIle1234
./hardlinkFIle123
./hardlinkFIle12
./hardlinkFIle1
./file1.txt


Now when I pipe it in with |wc -l, I get the total number of lines 9:



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile | wc -l


What I want is for each xargs batch -n 1 to give me the count :
so i want:



4
5









share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

    – steeldriver
    yesterday











  • Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

    – Goking
    16 hours ago












  • Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

    – steeldriver
    15 hours ago











  • The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

    – Goking
    14 hours ago











  • Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

    – Goking
    14 hours ago















-1















So my task is to find the file with the most hardlinks in a directory.
So far i have :



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile 


which gives me:



./hardlinkFIle245
./hardlinkFIle23
./hardlinkFIle2
./file2.txt
./hardlinkFIle1234
./hardlinkFIle123
./hardlinkFIle12
./hardlinkFIle1
./file1.txt


Now when I pipe it in with |wc -l, I get the total number of lines 9:



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile | wc -l


What I want is for each xargs batch -n 1 to give me the count :
so i want:



4
5









share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.




















  • Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

    – steeldriver
    yesterday











  • Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

    – Goking
    16 hours ago












  • Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

    – steeldriver
    15 hours ago











  • The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

    – Goking
    14 hours ago











  • Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

    – Goking
    14 hours ago













-1












-1








-1








So my task is to find the file with the most hardlinks in a directory.
So far i have :



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile 


which gives me:



./hardlinkFIle245
./hardlinkFIle23
./hardlinkFIle2
./file2.txt
./hardlinkFIle1234
./hardlinkFIle123
./hardlinkFIle12
./hardlinkFIle1
./file1.txt


Now when I pipe it in with |wc -l, I get the total number of lines 9:



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile | wc -l


What I want is for each xargs batch -n 1 to give me the count :
so i want:



4
5









share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












So my task is to find the file with the most hardlinks in a directory.
So far i have :



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile 


which gives me:



./hardlinkFIle245
./hardlinkFIle23
./hardlinkFIle2
./file2.txt
./hardlinkFIle1234
./hardlinkFIle123
./hardlinkFIle12
./hardlinkFIle1
./file1.txt


Now when I pipe it in with |wc -l, I get the total number of lines 9:



find . -name "file*" | xargs -I -n 1 find . -samefile | wc -l


What I want is for each xargs batch -n 1 to give me the count :
so i want:



4
5






linux find pipe xargs






share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 10 hours ago









Stéphane Chazelas

311k57586945




311k57586945






New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









GokingGoking

1




1




New contributor




Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Goking is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












  • Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

    – steeldriver
    yesterday











  • Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

    – Goking
    16 hours ago












  • Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

    – steeldriver
    15 hours ago











  • The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

    – Goking
    14 hours ago











  • Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

    – Goking
    14 hours ago

















  • Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

    – steeldriver
    yesterday











  • Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

    – Goking
    16 hours ago












  • Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

    – steeldriver
    15 hours ago











  • The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

    – Goking
    14 hours ago











  • Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

    – Goking
    14 hours ago
















Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

– steeldriver
yesterday





Doesn't your find command's -printf have a %n specifier for the number of hardlinks? You could simply sort and tail that

– steeldriver
yesterday













Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

– Goking
16 hours ago






Thanks man that is the right answer, but the sort is not working as expected after print f: find . -printf '%n' | sort -n How to to sort the answer and also print the file name and sort them by num,ber of hardlinks

– Goking
16 hours ago














Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

– steeldriver
15 hours ago





Something like find . -printf '%nt%fn' | sort -n | tail -n 1 should work, I think? if there is more than one file with the same number of links, it will return the one whose name is "numerically first"

– steeldriver
15 hours ago













The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

– Goking
14 hours ago





The way they are sorted are in order 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 and so on and not: just 5 and 4 so tail -n 3 gives me basically 3 5's, since they all point to the same file. But what i want is the unique files ordered by number by hardlinks sorted so tail - n 2 would give me 5 4 not 5 5.

– Goking
14 hours ago













Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

– Goking
14 hours ago





Just use uniq command: find . -printf '%nn' | uniq | sort -n -r

– Goking
14 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2














If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

inode = $0
getline file

++count[inode] >= max
files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
max = count[inode]
max_inode = inode

END
printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
'


Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.






share|improve this answer
































    2














    You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



    find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


    Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



    Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



    You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



    find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
    for file do
    printf "%sn" "$file"
    find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
    done' find-sh +





    share|improve this answer










    New contributor




    Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.



















      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "106"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );






      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507553%2fpipe-each-batch-of-xargs-trough-wc-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      2














      If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



      find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


      Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



      If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



      find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

      inode = $0
      getline file

      ++count[inode] >= max
      files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
      max = count[inode]
      max_inode = inode

      END
      printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
      '


      Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.






      share|improve this answer





























        2














        If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



        find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


        Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



        If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



        find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

        inode = $0
        getline file

        ++count[inode] >= max
        files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
        max = count[inode]
        max_inode = inode

        END
        printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
        '


        Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.






        share|improve this answer



























          2












          2








          2







          If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



          find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


          Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



          If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



          find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

          inode = $0
          getline file

          ++count[inode] >= max
          files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
          max = count[inode]
          max_inode = inode

          END
          printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
          '


          Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.






          share|improve this answer















          If using GNU find, you can have it report the number of links with -printf %n. So you can get the maximum value with:



          find . -name 'file*' -printf '%nn' | sort -rn | head -n1


          Note however that that number may include links that are not found under . or for entries that don't match the file* pattern.



          If you only want to count hardlinks named file* found under ., and see the paths for those, you could do:



          find . -name 'file*' -printf '%i%p' | gawk -v RS='' '

          inode = $0
          getline file

          ++count[inode] >= max
          files[inode] = files[inode] " - " file ORS
          max = count[inode]
          max_inode = inode

          END
          printf "%s", "File with most links ("max"):n" files[max_inode]
          '


          Which would still run just one find invocation instead of one per file.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 11 hours ago

























          answered 11 hours ago









          Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas

          311k57586945




          311k57586945























              2














              You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



              find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


              Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



              Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



              You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



              find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
              for file do
              printf "%sn" "$file"
              find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
              done' find-sh +





              share|improve this answer










              New contributor




              Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
              Check out our Code of Conduct.
























                2














                You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



                find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


                Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



                Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



                You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



                find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
                for file do
                printf "%sn" "$file"
                find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
                done' find-sh +





                share|improve this answer










                New contributor




                Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                Check out our Code of Conduct.






















                  2












                  2








                  2







                  You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



                  find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


                  Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



                  Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



                  You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



                  find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
                  for file do
                  printf "%sn" "$file"
                  find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
                  done' find-sh +





                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.










                  You can just spawn a new shell on each xargs:



                  find . -name "file*" | xargs -n 1 sh -c 'echo "$1"; find . -samefile "$1" | wc -l' xargs-sh


                  Though using xargs is a bad idea here as it would break if file paths contain whitespace of quoting characters.



                  Here, using wc -l is also brittle as it breaks if file paths contain newline characters.



                  You could use the standard find -exec cmd + syntax and save having to run one sh per file by using a loop:



                  find . -name "file*" -exec sh -c '
                  for file do
                  printf "%sn" "$file"
                  find .//. -samefile "$file" | grep -c //
                  done' find-sh +






                  share|improve this answer










                  New contributor




                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer








                  edited 10 hours ago









                  Stéphane Chazelas

                  311k57586945




                  311k57586945






                  New contributor




                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.









                  answered yesterday









                  Entropy0Entropy0

                  562




                  562




                  New contributor




                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.





                  New contributor





                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.






                  Entropy0 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
                  Check out our Code of Conduct.




















                      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                      draft saved

                      draft discarded


















                      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                      Goking is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f507553%2fpipe-each-batch-of-xargs-trough-wc-l%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                      Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition

                      Marilyn Monroe Ny fiainany manokana | Jereo koa | Meny fitetezanafanitarana azy.