Sound waves in different octavesWhy do I hear beats through headphones only at low frequencies?The definition of “frequency” in different contextsSound Wave Propagation: Why HF are more specular while LF are more omniHow are complex sound waves combined?Frequency dependance of sound wave reflectionWhy is a single string's vibration very weak but on the other hand, a guitar's string can be very loud?Is it possible to estimate the speed of a passing vehicle using a musical ear and the doppler effect?Intensity of sound and pitch perceptionWhere do pure tones occur in nature, besides harmonics?Why can we distinguish different pitches in a chord but not different hues of light?

Why do ¬, ∀ and ∃ have the same precedence?

Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

How can I write humor as character trait?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?

Why is it that I can sometimes guess the next note?

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

Creating two special characters

What is the difference between lands and mana?

What is Cash Advance APR?

C++ copy constructor called at return

PTIJ: Why is Haman obsessed with Bose?

Why Shazam when there is already Superman?

Which Article Helped Get Rid of Technobabble in RPGs?

How much theory knowledge is actually used while playing?

Does an advisor owe his/her student anything? Will an advisor keep a PhD student only out of pity?

"It doesn't matter" or "it won't matter"?

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

Why should universal income be universal?

The Digit Triangles

What does "Scientists rise up against statistical significance" mean? (Comment in Nature)

Does "he squandered his car on drink" sound natural?

Why can't the Brexit deadlock in the UK parliament be solved with a plurality vote?

Giving feedback to someone without sounding prejudiced

Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?



Sound waves in different octaves


Why do I hear beats through headphones only at low frequencies?The definition of “frequency” in different contextsSound Wave Propagation: Why HF are more specular while LF are more omniHow are complex sound waves combined?Frequency dependance of sound wave reflectionWhy is a single string's vibration very weak but on the other hand, a guitar's string can be very loud?Is it possible to estimate the speed of a passing vehicle using a musical ear and the doppler effect?Intensity of sound and pitch perceptionWhere do pure tones occur in nature, besides harmonics?Why can we distinguish different pitches in a chord but not different hues of light?













5












$begingroup$


How do the sound waves compare between different octaves? Why is it that you can play a low c and a c, and they are at different frequencies, but the same tone? An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming, so would the slopes of the waves align? You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune. My AP physics teacher was unable to answer why.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – PhysicsDave
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    yesterday






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    yesterday







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    yesterday
















5












$begingroup$


How do the sound waves compare between different octaves? Why is it that you can play a low c and a c, and they are at different frequencies, but the same tone? An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming, so would the slopes of the waves align? You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune. My AP physics teacher was unable to answer why.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – PhysicsDave
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    yesterday






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    yesterday







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    yesterday














5












5








5





$begingroup$


How do the sound waves compare between different octaves? Why is it that you can play a low c and a c, and they are at different frequencies, but the same tone? An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming, so would the slopes of the waves align? You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune. My AP physics teacher was unable to answer why.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




How do the sound waves compare between different octaves? Why is it that you can play a low c and a c, and they are at different frequencies, but the same tone? An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming, so would the slopes of the waves align? You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune. My AP physics teacher was unable to answer why.







waves acoustics frequency






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited yesterday









Ben Crowell

53.2k6165313




53.2k6165313






New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









Ava Miller Ava Miller

312




312




New contributor




Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Ava Miller is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – PhysicsDave
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    yesterday






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    yesterday







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    yesterday













  • 1




    $begingroup$
    The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
    $endgroup$
    – PhysicsDave
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    yesterday






  • 5




    $begingroup$
    @PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
    $endgroup$
    – Pieter
    yesterday







  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    yesterday






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
    $endgroup$
    – user45266
    yesterday








1




1




$begingroup$
The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– PhysicsDave
yesterday




$begingroup$
The word tone refers to a sound or note, or even an out of tune note. The higher c is a different tone than the middle c. Octaves are double (or half) the frequency of any note. Middle c is 440Hz, its octave is 880Hz ( another c). Also 220Hz, see wikipedia.
$endgroup$
– PhysicsDave
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
yesterday




$begingroup$
I feel like this a question more about human perception rather than physics. The physics just says that (what we call) octaves are at different frequencies. The similarity, pleasantness, etc. of sounds when compared is purely based on our perception.
$endgroup$
– Aaron Stevens
yesterday




5




5




$begingroup$
@PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
$endgroup$
– Pieter
yesterday





$begingroup$
@PhysicsDave Middle c is at 262 hertz (in current standard tuning where a' is att 440 hertz).
$endgroup$
– Pieter
yesterday





1




1




$begingroup$
Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
$endgroup$
– user45266
yesterday




$begingroup$
Heavily related is music.stackexchange.com/q/44783/45266, which I believe answers the question pretty well.
$endgroup$
– user45266
yesterday




1




1




$begingroup$
And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
$endgroup$
– user45266
yesterday





$begingroup$
And certainly music.stackexchange.com/q/43335/45266, specifically the answers. Check these out, guys!
$endgroup$
– user45266
yesterday











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















13












$begingroup$

The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




No, it's the first overtone.




How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You're assuming linearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
    $endgroup$
    – whatsisname
    yesterday






  • 4




    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks- it is a common misconception that the 'hairs' vibrate at different frequencies -- they are all identical (and far too small for audible frequencies). They are positioned along the sides of a long (coiled) tube and detect frequencies as the locations where the reflection from the end of the tube matches the incoming wave.
    $endgroup$
    – amI
    23 hours ago



















6












$begingroup$

I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest (fundamental frequency $f_0$), and the overtones are integer multiples $nf_0$ of it.



The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.



However, one should not believe that this spectral line-up is a definitive explanation for the particularly pure perception of the octave by most people. Let me give the following reasons (citing from the answer of topo morto on Music SE) to a similar question:



  • a higher note with a fundamental frequency that is the same as that of one of the lower note's higher (>2) harmonics will also have a subset of the lower note's harmonics

  • a sound with only the first, third, and fifth harmonics (as produced, e.g., by some woodwind instruments) won't share any component pitches with the same timbre sounded an octave up





share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



    So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




    would the slopes of the waves align?




    The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



    One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      yesterday


















    0












    $begingroup$

    Your ear recognizes different frequencies because hairs in the cochlea vibrate at certain frequencies, and they send a message to your brain telling you that you're hearing a particular frequency. Let's take the pitch A=440hz. That sets off the A440 receptor most strongly, but also sets off the A880 receptor less strongly. A880 is an octave higher than A440, and obviously the A880 receptor is expecting to be "pushed" 880 times per second, but A440 "pushes" the A880 receptor every other time it is expecting, so it sends a weaker signal to the brain, and our brain picks this multiples of frequencies up as an octave.



    There's a vihart video on this topic that I think probably answers the question more clearly than I did, but this is the cliffnotes version.






    share|cite|improve this answer








    New contributor




    Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.






    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      Sorry, but Vi Hart is wrong there about how the cochlea works.
      $endgroup$
      – Pieter
      19 hours ago










    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "151"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );






    Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467666%2fsound-waves-in-different-octaves%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    13












    $begingroup$

    The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



    Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




    An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




    No, it's the first overtone.




    How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




    Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




    You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




    The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You're assuming linearity.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
      $endgroup$
      – whatsisname
      yesterday






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @HotLicks- it is a common misconception that the 'hairs' vibrate at different frequencies -- they are all identical (and far too small for audible frequencies). They are positioned along the sides of a long (coiled) tube and detect frequencies as the locations where the reflection from the end of the tube matches the incoming wave.
      $endgroup$
      – amI
      23 hours ago
















    13












    $begingroup$

    The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



    Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




    An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




    No, it's the first overtone.




    How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




    Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




    You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




    The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You're assuming linearity.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
      $endgroup$
      – whatsisname
      yesterday






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @HotLicks- it is a common misconception that the 'hairs' vibrate at different frequencies -- they are all identical (and far too small for audible frequencies). They are positioned along the sides of a long (coiled) tube and detect frequencies as the locations where the reflection from the end of the tube matches the incoming wave.
      $endgroup$
      – amI
      23 hours ago














    13












    13








    13





    $begingroup$

    The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



    Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




    An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




    No, it's the first overtone.




    How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




    Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




    You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




    The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$



    The phenomenon you're asking about is known as octave equivalence. It's a hard-wired thing in the human ear-brain system. (We know it's hard-wired because it's present without musical training and is true cross-culturally.) Notes that differ in frequency by a factor of 2 (or a power of 2) are perceptually similar, and may be mistaken for one another, even by trained musicians. So this is really a fact about the ear-brain system (i.e., psychology and physiology) rather than physics, although it does relate to a physical property.



    Looking through the index entries on this topic in Diana Deutsch, The psychology of music, 3rd ed., 2013, I don't see anything about any physical, neurological, or evolutionary explanation of octave equivalence. That may mean that nobody has such an explanation, or just that it wasn't something that Deutsch wanted to get into in this anthology of articles. It seems likely that it has at least some physical basis, because periodic tones usually have their first two frequencies (fundamental and first harmonic) in the ratio of two to one.




    An octave above a note is the fourth overtone, I'm assuming




    No, it's the first overtone.




    How do the sound waves compare between different octaves?




    Pitch perception can be complicated in some cases, but essentially our sense of pitch is normally based on the period of the wave. So notes differing by an octave in pitch have waveforms that are related by the fact that their periods are in a 2 to 1 ratio.




    You can still tune to these notes between octaves, and the beats can still be heard if out of tune.




    The beats would be beats between the first harmonic of the lower note and the fundamental of the higher note.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited yesterday

























    answered yesterday









    Ben CrowellBen Crowell

    53.2k6165313




    53.2k6165313











    • $begingroup$
      If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You're assuming linearity.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
      $endgroup$
      – whatsisname
      yesterday






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @HotLicks- it is a common misconception that the 'hairs' vibrate at different frequencies -- they are all identical (and far too small for audible frequencies). They are positioned along the sides of a long (coiled) tube and detect frequencies as the locations where the reflection from the end of the tube matches the incoming wave.
      $endgroup$
      – amI
      23 hours ago

















    • $begingroup$
      If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
      $endgroup$
      – Ben Crowell
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You're assuming linearity.
      $endgroup$
      – Hot Licks
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
      $endgroup$
      – whatsisname
      yesterday






    • 4




      $begingroup$
      @HotLicks- it is a common misconception that the 'hairs' vibrate at different frequencies -- they are all identical (and far too small for audible frequencies). They are positioned along the sides of a long (coiled) tube and detect frequencies as the locations where the reflection from the end of the tube matches the incoming wave.
      $endgroup$
      – amI
      23 hours ago
















    $begingroup$
    If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    If you think about it, the human ear contains thousands (if not millions) of tiny hairs which vibrate at different frequencies. The nervous system detects the vibration as "sound". But, as with guitar strings, a hair that is "tuned" to a given frequency will tend to vibrate at frequencies twice as high, or, to a lesser extent, half as high. To avoid befuddling the poor human, the nervous system somehow combines the various related harmonics into a single sensation, with high or low being a separate sensation.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: Normally a resonator does not respond strongly to a driving force at twice its resonant frequency, so it's far from obvious that the mechanism you propose should occur.
    $endgroup$
    – Ben Crowell
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    You're assuming linearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    You're assuming linearity.
    $endgroup$
    – Hot Licks
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
    $endgroup$
    – whatsisname
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks: it can hardly boil down to a "single sensation". We can also perceive the spectral content of a sound. Just like our vision system, our hearing has some very sophisticated signal processing capabilities.
    $endgroup$
    – whatsisname
    yesterday




    4




    4




    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks- it is a common misconception that the 'hairs' vibrate at different frequencies -- they are all identical (and far too small for audible frequencies). They are positioned along the sides of a long (coiled) tube and detect frequencies as the locations where the reflection from the end of the tube matches the incoming wave.
    $endgroup$
    – amI
    23 hours ago





    $begingroup$
    @HotLicks- it is a common misconception that the 'hairs' vibrate at different frequencies -- they are all identical (and far too small for audible frequencies). They are positioned along the sides of a long (coiled) tube and detect frequencies as the locations where the reflection from the end of the tube matches the incoming wave.
    $endgroup$
    – amI
    23 hours ago












    6












    $begingroup$

    I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest (fundamental frequency $f_0$), and the overtones are integer multiples $nf_0$ of it.



    The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



    The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



    The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.



    However, one should not believe that this spectral line-up is a definitive explanation for the particularly pure perception of the octave by most people. Let me give the following reasons (citing from the answer of topo morto on Music SE) to a similar question:



    • a higher note with a fundamental frequency that is the same as that of one of the lower note's higher (>2) harmonics will also have a subset of the lower note's harmonics

    • a sound with only the first, third, and fifth harmonics (as produced, e.g., by some woodwind instruments) won't share any component pitches with the same timbre sounded an octave up





    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$

















      6












      $begingroup$

      I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest (fundamental frequency $f_0$), and the overtones are integer multiples $nf_0$ of it.



      The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



      The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



      The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.



      However, one should not believe that this spectral line-up is a definitive explanation for the particularly pure perception of the octave by most people. Let me give the following reasons (citing from the answer of topo morto on Music SE) to a similar question:



      • a higher note with a fundamental frequency that is the same as that of one of the lower note's higher (>2) harmonics will also have a subset of the lower note's harmonics

      • a sound with only the first, third, and fifth harmonics (as produced, e.g., by some woodwind instruments) won't share any component pitches with the same timbre sounded an octave up





      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$















        6












        6








        6





        $begingroup$

        I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest (fundamental frequency $f_0$), and the overtones are integer multiples $nf_0$ of it.



        The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



        The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



        The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.



        However, one should not believe that this spectral line-up is a definitive explanation for the particularly pure perception of the octave by most people. Let me give the following reasons (citing from the answer of topo morto on Music SE) to a similar question:



        • a higher note with a fundamental frequency that is the same as that of one of the lower note's higher (>2) harmonics will also have a subset of the lower note's harmonics

        • a sound with only the first, third, and fifth harmonics (as produced, e.g., by some woodwind instruments) won't share any component pitches with the same timbre sounded an octave up





        share|cite|improve this answer











        $endgroup$



        I basically agree with the answers of Ben Crowell and of Pieter. The fact that we hear the octave as a pleasant pure interval is hard-wired in the human hearing system. As Pieter explained, musical instruments produce tones with many overtones of different intensities, where usually the frequency assigned to the tone is the lowest (fundamental frequency $f_0$), and the overtones are integer multiples $nf_0$ of it.



        The point I can add to these previous answers gives a hint, why the octave is a very special interval sounding most pure. The point is that if you produce a perfect octave on a musical instrument, the frequencies of all the overtones of the higher note will exactly line up with frequencies of the overtones of the lower note. This means that any beating in the resulting sound is reduced to a minimum.



        The situation is already different for a perfect fifth. In this case only every second overtone of the higher note lines up with an overtone of the lower note.



        The situation gets even worse for the other intervals. For example, for the minor third, only every fifth overtone lines up, and other overtones start to generate beatings. For dissonances, like the minor second, none of the overtones line up, and severe beatings arise from the overtones, resulting in a 'rough' perceived sound.



        However, one should not believe that this spectral line-up is a definitive explanation for the particularly pure perception of the octave by most people. Let me give the following reasons (citing from the answer of topo morto on Music SE) to a similar question:



        • a higher note with a fundamental frequency that is the same as that of one of the lower note's higher (>2) harmonics will also have a subset of the lower note's harmonics

        • a sound with only the first, third, and fifth harmonics (as produced, e.g., by some woodwind instruments) won't share any component pitches with the same timbre sounded an octave up






        share|cite|improve this answer














        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer








        edited 19 hours ago

























        answered yesterday









        flaudemusflaudemus

        1,899313




        1,899313





















            4












            $begingroup$

            The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



            So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




            would the slopes of the waves align?




            The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



            One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
              $endgroup$
              – Ben Crowell
              yesterday















            4












            $begingroup$

            The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



            So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




            would the slopes of the waves align?




            The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



            One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
              $endgroup$
              – Ben Crowell
              yesterday













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



            So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




            would the slopes of the waves align?




            The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



            One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            The human voice and most musical instruments produce tones with many overtones. The sound pressure is periodic with a period $T$, but does not vary like a sine wave at all. Instead, it can be described by a Fourier series. That is the sum of sines that are integer multiples of the fundamental frequency $f=1/T$.



            So when a singer sings with a fundamental at 220 hertz (an a), that note includes overtones at 440 hertz (a'), 660 hertz (e"), 880 hertz (a") etcetera. This is why beats can be heard between two instruments that play an a and an a' slightly out of tune.




            would the slopes of the waves align?




            The ear does a kind of Fourier analysis of the input waveform, where different frequencies are mapped to different parts of the cochlea and to different nerves going to the brain. Our hearing is almost insensitive to the relative phase between the frequency components.



            One can look at the frequency content of sounds with spectrogram apps on mobile phones or on https://musiclab.chromeexperiments.com/







            share|cite|improve this answer














            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer








            edited yesterday









            flaudemus

            1,899313




            1,899313










            answered yesterday









            PieterPieter

            9,06231536




            9,06231536











            • $begingroup$
              This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
              $endgroup$
              – Ben Crowell
              yesterday
















            • $begingroup$
              This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
              $endgroup$
              – Ben Crowell
              yesterday















            $begingroup$
            This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Crowell
            yesterday




            $begingroup$
            This doesn't answer the question, which is about octave identification.
            $endgroup$
            – Ben Crowell
            yesterday











            0












            $begingroup$

            Your ear recognizes different frequencies because hairs in the cochlea vibrate at certain frequencies, and they send a message to your brain telling you that you're hearing a particular frequency. Let's take the pitch A=440hz. That sets off the A440 receptor most strongly, but also sets off the A880 receptor less strongly. A880 is an octave higher than A440, and obviously the A880 receptor is expecting to be "pushed" 880 times per second, but A440 "pushes" the A880 receptor every other time it is expecting, so it sends a weaker signal to the brain, and our brain picks this multiples of frequencies up as an octave.



            There's a vihart video on this topic that I think probably answers the question more clearly than I did, but this is the cliffnotes version.






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Sorry, but Vi Hart is wrong there about how the cochlea works.
              $endgroup$
              – Pieter
              19 hours ago















            0












            $begingroup$

            Your ear recognizes different frequencies because hairs in the cochlea vibrate at certain frequencies, and they send a message to your brain telling you that you're hearing a particular frequency. Let's take the pitch A=440hz. That sets off the A440 receptor most strongly, but also sets off the A880 receptor less strongly. A880 is an octave higher than A440, and obviously the A880 receptor is expecting to be "pushed" 880 times per second, but A440 "pushes" the A880 receptor every other time it is expecting, so it sends a weaker signal to the brain, and our brain picks this multiples of frequencies up as an octave.



            There's a vihart video on this topic that I think probably answers the question more clearly than I did, but this is the cliffnotes version.






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              Sorry, but Vi Hart is wrong there about how the cochlea works.
              $endgroup$
              – Pieter
              19 hours ago













            0












            0








            0





            $begingroup$

            Your ear recognizes different frequencies because hairs in the cochlea vibrate at certain frequencies, and they send a message to your brain telling you that you're hearing a particular frequency. Let's take the pitch A=440hz. That sets off the A440 receptor most strongly, but also sets off the A880 receptor less strongly. A880 is an octave higher than A440, and obviously the A880 receptor is expecting to be "pushed" 880 times per second, but A440 "pushes" the A880 receptor every other time it is expecting, so it sends a weaker signal to the brain, and our brain picks this multiples of frequencies up as an octave.



            There's a vihart video on this topic that I think probably answers the question more clearly than I did, but this is the cliffnotes version.






            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            $endgroup$



            Your ear recognizes different frequencies because hairs in the cochlea vibrate at certain frequencies, and they send a message to your brain telling you that you're hearing a particular frequency. Let's take the pitch A=440hz. That sets off the A440 receptor most strongly, but also sets off the A880 receptor less strongly. A880 is an octave higher than A440, and obviously the A880 receptor is expecting to be "pushed" 880 times per second, but A440 "pushes" the A880 receptor every other time it is expecting, so it sends a weaker signal to the brain, and our brain picks this multiples of frequencies up as an octave.



            There's a vihart video on this topic that I think probably answers the question more clearly than I did, but this is the cliffnotes version.







            share|cite|improve this answer








            New contributor




            Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer






            New contributor




            Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.









            answered yesterday









            Kai ColemanKai Coleman

            91




            91




            New contributor




            Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.





            New contributor





            Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.






            Kai Coleman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
            Check out our Code of Conduct.











            • $begingroup$
              Sorry, but Vi Hart is wrong there about how the cochlea works.
              $endgroup$
              – Pieter
              19 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              Sorry, but Vi Hart is wrong there about how the cochlea works.
              $endgroup$
              – Pieter
              19 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            Sorry, but Vi Hart is wrong there about how the cochlea works.
            $endgroup$
            – Pieter
            19 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            Sorry, but Vi Hart is wrong there about how the cochlea works.
            $endgroup$
            – Pieter
            19 hours ago










            Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












            Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











            Ava Miller is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














            Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f467666%2fsound-waves-in-different-octaves%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

            NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

            대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495