Replace anything between parentheses even if spanning multiple lines2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow do I delete the first n lines of an ascii file using shell commands?How to replace text between two markers in a file with a section of text from another file?Delete multiple lines in a fileUsing sed to replace spaces in text files with _ only when between “ ” after specific stringHow to match text between a string and a spaceAppend multiple lines, specified as verbatim bash variable, after a matched line in file?Replace matching parentheses with enclosing contentText Processing - Get 2 lines with exact text between themDeleting parentheses in shell scriptStrings replace in bash using multiple lines pattern

Taxes on Dividends in a Roth IRA

Shouldn’t conservatives embrace universal basic income?

A Trivial Diagnosis

Why does this expression simplify as such?

How could a planet have erratic days?

Pre-mixing cryogenic fuels and using only one fuel tank

Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience

Change the color of a single dot in `ddot` symbol

Can you use Vicious Mockery to win an argument or gain favours?

Quoting Keynes in a lecture

What is the English pronunciation of "pain au chocolat"?

How to draw a matrix with arrows in limited space

Which Article Helped Get Rid of Technobabble in RPGs?

I found an audio circuit and I built it just fine, but I find it a bit too quiet. How do I amplify the output so that it is a bit louder?

Do we have to expect a queue for the shuttle from Watford Junction to Harry Potter Studio?

Will number of steps recorded on FitBit/any fitness tracker add up distance in PokemonGo?

What features enable the Su-25 Frogfoot to operate with such a wide variety of fuels?

How do you make your own symbol when Detexify fails?

What to do when eye contact makes your coworker uncomfortable?

What are some good ways to treat frozen vegetables such that they behave like fresh vegetables when stir frying them?

Why is so much work done on numerical verification of the Riemann Hypothesis?

Non-trope happy ending?

What is the difference between lands and mana?

Why does Carol not get rid of the Kree symbol on her suit when she changes its colours?



Replace anything between parentheses even if spanning multiple lines



2019 Community Moderator ElectionHow do I delete the first n lines of an ascii file using shell commands?How to replace text between two markers in a file with a section of text from another file?Delete multiple lines in a fileUsing sed to replace spaces in text files with _ only when between “ ” after specific stringHow to match text between a string and a spaceAppend multiple lines, specified as verbatim bash variable, after a matched line in file?Replace matching parentheses with enclosing contentText Processing - Get 2 lines with exact text between themDeleting parentheses in shell scriptStrings replace in bash using multiple lines pattern










6















I would like to use bash or shell script and replace anything between the two parentheses with an empty space. The text between the two parentheses could be in multiple lines, such as:



myFunction (line0

line1

line2

line3

line4)


that I would like to convert to:



myFunction ( )


I appreciate any help. My hope is to use sed for this purpose.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Did you want to replace line with newline or prepend/prefix all non-empty lines inside the parentheses with new?

    – phk
    Jan 29 '17 at 12:35












  • No, indeed I want to replace some text which is sitting between two parentheses in multiple lines with some new text that I am going to read from a second file.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 18:32











  • You want to convert to myFunction ( ) or to replace the text with new text that comes from a second file as per your comment above? You talk about two different things.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:58











  • Eventually I would like to replace the text within the two parentheses with a new text. However, the final replacement is easy. That's why I simplified my question.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 22:06











  • This has turned into an meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem/… - tell us what you actually want to do. By all means tell us what you can do yourself.

    – icarus
    Jan 30 '17 at 3:19















6















I would like to use bash or shell script and replace anything between the two parentheses with an empty space. The text between the two parentheses could be in multiple lines, such as:



myFunction (line0

line1

line2

line3

line4)


that I would like to convert to:



myFunction ( )


I appreciate any help. My hope is to use sed for this purpose.










share|improve this question



















  • 2





    Did you want to replace line with newline or prepend/prefix all non-empty lines inside the parentheses with new?

    – phk
    Jan 29 '17 at 12:35












  • No, indeed I want to replace some text which is sitting between two parentheses in multiple lines with some new text that I am going to read from a second file.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 18:32











  • You want to convert to myFunction ( ) or to replace the text with new text that comes from a second file as per your comment above? You talk about two different things.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:58











  • Eventually I would like to replace the text within the two parentheses with a new text. However, the final replacement is easy. That's why I simplified my question.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 22:06











  • This has turned into an meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem/… - tell us what you actually want to do. By all means tell us what you can do yourself.

    – icarus
    Jan 30 '17 at 3:19













6












6








6


2






I would like to use bash or shell script and replace anything between the two parentheses with an empty space. The text between the two parentheses could be in multiple lines, such as:



myFunction (line0

line1

line2

line3

line4)


that I would like to convert to:



myFunction ( )


I appreciate any help. My hope is to use sed for this purpose.










share|improve this question
















I would like to use bash or shell script and replace anything between the two parentheses with an empty space. The text between the two parentheses could be in multiple lines, such as:



myFunction (line0

line1

line2

line3

line4)


that I would like to convert to:



myFunction ( )


I appreciate any help. My hope is to use sed for this purpose.







shell-script text-processing regular-expression






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Jan 29 '17 at 21:49







Armin

















asked Jan 28 '17 at 23:15









ArminArmin

336




336







  • 2





    Did you want to replace line with newline or prepend/prefix all non-empty lines inside the parentheses with new?

    – phk
    Jan 29 '17 at 12:35












  • No, indeed I want to replace some text which is sitting between two parentheses in multiple lines with some new text that I am going to read from a second file.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 18:32











  • You want to convert to myFunction ( ) or to replace the text with new text that comes from a second file as per your comment above? You talk about two different things.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:58











  • Eventually I would like to replace the text within the two parentheses with a new text. However, the final replacement is easy. That's why I simplified my question.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 22:06











  • This has turned into an meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem/… - tell us what you actually want to do. By all means tell us what you can do yourself.

    – icarus
    Jan 30 '17 at 3:19












  • 2





    Did you want to replace line with newline or prepend/prefix all non-empty lines inside the parentheses with new?

    – phk
    Jan 29 '17 at 12:35












  • No, indeed I want to replace some text which is sitting between two parentheses in multiple lines with some new text that I am going to read from a second file.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 18:32











  • You want to convert to myFunction ( ) or to replace the text with new text that comes from a second file as per your comment above? You talk about two different things.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:58











  • Eventually I would like to replace the text within the two parentheses with a new text. However, the final replacement is easy. That's why I simplified my question.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 22:06











  • This has turned into an meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem/… - tell us what you actually want to do. By all means tell us what you can do yourself.

    – icarus
    Jan 30 '17 at 3:19







2




2





Did you want to replace line with newline or prepend/prefix all non-empty lines inside the parentheses with new?

– phk
Jan 29 '17 at 12:35






Did you want to replace line with newline or prepend/prefix all non-empty lines inside the parentheses with new?

– phk
Jan 29 '17 at 12:35














No, indeed I want to replace some text which is sitting between two parentheses in multiple lines with some new text that I am going to read from a second file.

– Armin
Jan 29 '17 at 18:32





No, indeed I want to replace some text which is sitting between two parentheses in multiple lines with some new text that I am going to read from a second file.

– Armin
Jan 29 '17 at 18:32













You want to convert to myFunction ( ) or to replace the text with new text that comes from a second file as per your comment above? You talk about two different things.

– George Vasiliou
Jan 29 '17 at 21:58





You want to convert to myFunction ( ) or to replace the text with new text that comes from a second file as per your comment above? You talk about two different things.

– George Vasiliou
Jan 29 '17 at 21:58













Eventually I would like to replace the text within the two parentheses with a new text. However, the final replacement is easy. That's why I simplified my question.

– Armin
Jan 29 '17 at 22:06





Eventually I would like to replace the text within the two parentheses with a new text. However, the final replacement is easy. That's why I simplified my question.

– Armin
Jan 29 '17 at 22:06













This has turned into an meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem/… - tell us what you actually want to do. By all means tell us what you can do yourself.

– icarus
Jan 30 '17 at 3:19





This has turned into an meta.stackexchange.com/questions/66377/what-is-the-xy-problem/… - tell us what you actually want to do. By all means tell us what you can do yourself.

– icarus
Jan 30 '17 at 3:19










8 Answers
8






active

oldest

votes


















5














AWK



AWK allows executing code-block on range of conditions. In this case, we want to execute gsub() on every line in range from the one that contains ( to the one that contains ).



$ awk '$0~/[(]/,$0~/[)]/gsub(/line/,"newline");1' input.txt 
another line
something else

myFunction (newline0

newline1

whatever

newline2

newline3

newline4)

some other line


Python (original answer)



Here's a quick python script that does the job:



#!/usr/bin/env python3
from __future__ import print_function
import sys

with open(sys.argv[1]) as fp:
flag = None
for line in fp:
clean_line = line.strip()
if "(" in clean_line: flag = True
if flag:
clean_line = clean_line.replace("line","newline")
print(clean_line)
if ")" in clean_line: flag = False


Test run:



$ cat input.txt 
another line
something else

myFunction (line0

line1

lilne2

line3

line4)

some other line
$ ./edit_function_args.py input.txt
another line
something else

myFunction (newline0

newline1

newline2

newline3

line4)

some other line


BASH version



The same script, except rewritten in bash with sed



#!/bin/bash
flag=false
while IFS= read -r line
do

if grep -q '(' <<< "$line"
then
flag=true
fi


if $flag
then
line=$(sed 's/line/newline/' <<< "$line")
fi

printf "%sn" "$line"


if grep -q ')' <<< "$line"
then
flag=false
fi

done < "$1"





share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks! I am going to check it. In the meantime, do you know by chance any way to do the same thing in shell ? This is mainly because the rest of my script is in bash.

    – Armin
    Jan 28 '17 at 23:35











  • @Armin Sure, can be done. I can rewrite my python script in bash+sed or even awk, but I'm kind of running out of time here - have to leave my work in 20 minutes. I'll edit it and post once i get home. OK ?

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 28 '17 at 23:37











  • @Armin I also threw in an awk version, which is fairly short an simple. Hope that helps

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:15


















6














Taking the bash answer of @Serg and converting it to use bash builtins, rather than 2 or 3 processes per line. Processes are cheap but not free!



#!/bin/bash
# Use shell builtins, read, true, false, printf
flag=false
while IFS= read -r line
do
case "$line" in
(*"("*) flag=true ;;
esac

if $flag
then
line=$line//line/newline
fi

printf "%sn" "$line"

case "$line" in
(*")"*) flag=false ;;
esac

done < "$1"





share|improve this answer























  • Heh, OK, pretty good. I'd want to say that on modern systems with plenty of RAM and multi-core processes multiple processes wouldn't be an issue, but it might be useful on legacy systems.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:10











  • *multi-core processors , small typo there

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:20






  • 1





    @Serg, Time it! Multi-core processors don't help as this is all sequential. On a system where each core reports about 5000 bogomips, it takes me about 6 milliseconds to start a sed, read a line, and exit, and 7 milliseconds to start a grep. This assumes that sed and grep are in the system cache. So this means assuming that all other overheads can be ignored you are limited to about 70 lines a second. Because I am ignoring all other overheads I can process at an infinite number of lines a second :-) using shell builtins.

    – icarus
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:47











  • @icarus, how would you change line=$line//line/newline to replace anything in this line with empty space ? Many thanks in advance.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:16











  • @icarus Eh . . . I somehow doubt shells , even with built-ins, perform noticeably better. If we want speed and performance, then it's job for C or other compiled language, heck maybe even for Python.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 30 '17 at 0:03


















5














If perl solution is okay and file is small enough to be processed as a whole:



$ perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/$&=~s|line|newline|gr/ge' ip.txt 
myFunction (newline0

newline1

newline2

newline3

newline4)



  • -0777 slurp entire input file


  • ([^)]+) pattern to match - ( followed by non ) characters and ending with )


  • $&=~s|line|newline|gr the matched pattern is referenced here using $& and the desired replacement (line to newline) is done. Note the r flag to return the result as the replacement string


  • e flag allows to use expression instead of string

  • use perl -i -0777 -pe for inplace editing





share|improve this answer























  • Thanks @Sundeep. Before trying this, please note that I don't know what is the exact value for variable line. How can I say whatever between to parentheses to be replaced by let's say an empty space?

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 20:22












  • @Armin not sure of your question, something like this? perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/( )/g' ip.txt

    – Sundeep
    Jan 30 '17 at 1:51


















4














For the question and data as originally presented, a sed 1-liner works



 sed '/(/,/)/s/line/newline/g'


which says for each region that starts with a line containing an ( and ends with a line containing a ')', substitute globally line for newline. Remove the g if you only want to change the first line on an input line.



For the modified question,



 sed -e '/(/' -e ':loop;s/(.*)/()/;t;N;b loop' -e ''


works. It loops over the input,printing it until it finds a (. At this point it tries to change everything inside a ( ) pair including the delimiters to just (). If this succeeds it breaks out of the loop, prints the result and continues. If it didn't manage to do so, usually because it hasn't yet seen the ), it appends the next input line and continues the loop. If you don't want it on one line then writing it as



sed -e '/(/
:loop
s/(.*)/()/
t
N
b loop
'


makes it easier to follow.






share|improve this answer

























  • Pretty good. Gave me idea for a similar awk solution.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:16






  • 1





    As data are presented, even a sed 's/line/newline/g' would do the job....

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:29











  • OK, using the data as presented and the problem description, you need the range limiting. The point of the "data as presented" comment is that it allows us to ignore nesting of parenthesis, and that there are no line before an ( or after a ) that need to be left unchanged.

    – icarus
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:49







  • 1





    @GeorgeVasiliou as presented - yes. But you gotta think one step ahead. OP likely has file with more than just one function. You have to anticipate that there are line words that OP might not want to edit or they are outside of parenthesis

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 2:01






  • 1





    @Serg Yes, sure. I just believe that OP should enrich the question. Even thinking that this is a source code file with lot of functions, the correct question & answer i think should recognize myfunction ( line0 , etc) instead of just (line0,etc )

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 8:51



















3














Using awk:

awk '
function mysub(str)
if (str) gsub(/line/, "newline", str); return str

BEGIN
OFS=FS="("

NF>1
if (FS=="(")
print $1,mysub($2); OFS=FS=")"
else
print mysub($1),$2; OFS=FS="("

next


print FS=="(" ? $0 : mysub($0)
' /path/to/input


The custom function mysub is where you do the replacements you want to do between the parentheses. The assumption is that parentheses aren't nested.



How it works:

There are two states, inside and outside the parentheses.



  • Outside (the starting state), the input and output separator is set to the opening parenthesis (OFS=FS="(").

  • Once it comes across a line with more than one field separated by the input separator (NF>1) and…

    • …you are currently in the outside mode (FS=="("), everything before and after the field separator is outputted (with the output separator in-between) but with latter going through the replacement function (mysub($2)) and then the the mode is flipped by changing the input and output separators (OFS=FS=")"),

    • …otherwise (else), you are in inside mode, and everything before and after the field separator is outputted but this time with former going through the replacement function (mysub($1)) and the mode flips here as well.


  • On all other lines, the whole line is outputted unchanged if outside (FS=="(") or otherwise goes as a whole through the replacement function (mysub($0)).



Compressed into a single line:

awk 'function m(s)gsub(/line/,"newline",s);return sBEGINOFS=FS="("NF>1if(FS=="(")print $1,m($2);OFS=FS=")"elseprint m($1),$2;OFS=FS="("nextprint FS=="("?$0:m($0)' /path/to/input


My trickier test data (which some the one-liner solutions here will fail with):

line96
line97 myFunction (line0

line1

line2

line3

line4) line98
line99


Output for it:

line96
line97 myFunction (newline0

newline1

newline2

newline3

newline4) line98
line99


Variation where everything between the parentheses is deleted instead (except for the first and last line breaks):

awk '
BEGIN
OFS=FS="("

NF>1
if (FS=="(")
print $1,""; OFS=FS=")"
else
print "",$2; OFS=FS="("

next

FS=="("' /path/to/input


Output for this one:

line96
line97 myFunction (
) line98
line99





share|improve this answer

























  • @Armin If this answer solves your problem, would be kind except thanking phk also to accept this answer as a solution.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 0:49











  • Thanks @phk. Would you lease let me know how in this script could I replace "any thing" (not a specific string), with let's say an empty space. Still I am struggling with replacing anyThingMultiLine with empty space between parentheses. I appreciate your help.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:05











  • @Armin See my latest edit of my answer.

    – phk
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:19



















2














Combining all the clarifications, comments and revised data, my offer would be like bellow.



First of all lets consider a source file d.txt containing your advised myFunction (...) plus one more function to be more realistic.

To be on the hard side lets suppose that those two functions in this d.txt file have almost identical contents, like this:



$ cat d.txt
myOtherFunction (x as boolean
y as integer
d as string
e as whatever)

myFunction (xx as boolean
yy as integer
dd as string
ee as whatever)


Lets suppose now that in another file d2.txt we have a different function.



$ cat d2.txt
BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
yyy as boolean
ddd as integer
eee as whatever)


Forgetting the sample names of line, newline , etc , and considering your comments it seems that what you really want is to replace in your initial source code file d.txt the existing myFunction (..) with the BrandNewFunction (...) present in file d2.txt.



This can be done easily using pure bash:



$ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)" #isolates myFunction from the source file d.txt
$ b="$(cat d2.txt)" #get contents of file d2.txt (BrandNewFunction)
$ c="$(cat d.txt)" #get the whole source file d.txt
$ echo "$c/$a/$b" #in source file d.txt ($c) replace $a with $b (d2.txt)
#Output:
myOtherFunction (x as boolean
y as integer
d as string
e as whatever)

BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
yyy as boolean
ddd as integer
eee as whatever)


Or even as one-liner:



$ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)";b="$(cat d2.txt)";c="$(cat d.txt)";echo "$c/$a/$b"


Above command just prints on your screen the replacement results (echo). To save the results just send echo to >d.txt for overwritting the existing file or even a new file if you like.



Sed seems not to be quite good to replace multiple lines separated by newlines, since it is focused on line operations.



AWK should be good for the job, but i'm not good in AWK.



Bash is the easiest solution, which can successfully replace multilines.



PS1: If file d2.txt contains more functions and you want to isolate the BrandNewFunction (..), similarly to source file d.txt you just need to modify the $b variable definition like this:



$ b="$(sed -n '/BrandNewFunction (/,/)/p' d2.txt)"


PS2: If you just want to replace myFunction (...) of source file d.txt with a blank function of the same name, you can just hardcode variable b like this (you know already which function from source file d.txt you want to delete, right?)



$ b="myFunction ( )" 





share|improve this answer

























  • @Armin This solution should cover you entirely.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 23:54











  • @Armin It would be kind to leave a comment just to advise what made you unaccept this answer. It would help me to improve future answers on similar posts.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 18:30











  • @Georges, indeed I used parts of your code to complete mine. Specially sed -n idea was very good. I didn't do a copy-past of the entire thing that you proposed, by I certainly used part of it. Please accept my apologies if I miss something as I am really new in this community. Thanks anyways for all your very useful advices.

    – Armin
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:24











  • @Armin Ok. I just got happy yesterday to see that you accepted my answer as a solution (maybe by mistake) and got unhappy today to see that my answer was unaccepted. Anyway, is your right to accept the best answer for you.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:32











  • @Armin I think that you also changed the accepted answer again. Yesterday you accept my answer, this afternoon you unaccept my answer and you accept the perl solution of Sundeep and now i can see that you also unaccept Sundeep solution and you accepted dirkt solution. You can upvote all solutions if you like them but you can accept only one solution. Do not hop around :-)

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:37


















2














If you also want to process nested parenthesis correctly, use a tool for a context-free language instead of a regular language, for example sgrep:



sgrep -o '%r ' '(start .. end) extracting ("("__")")' < input_file


This way, for example, the following



myFunction (line0

line1

(line2)

line3

line4)

anotherFun (x y)


becomes



myFunction ( ) 

anotherFun ( )





share|improve this answer























  • Thanks @dirkt. Unfortunately still I don't have sgrep on my machine properly installed.

    – Armin
    Jan 30 '17 at 22:37











  • Thanks @everyone. Eventually I had to use a combination of the solutions and tricks that you had proposed. Here is the algorithm that I implemented successfully in bash: (a) read line by line the file to detect myFunction and its contents, (b) commented myFunction using sed, (c) inserted new myFunction in the right place using a combination of sed and print.

    – Armin
    Jan 31 '17 at 21:22



















0














A new version of GNU sed supports the -z option.




Normally, sed reads a line by reading a string of characters up to the end-of-line character (new line or carriage return).

The GNU version of sed added a feature in version 4.2.2 to use the "NULL" character instead. This can be useful if you have files that use the NULL as a record separator. Some GNU utilities can genertae output that uses a NULL instead a new line, such as "find . -print0" or "grep -lZ".




You can use this option when you want sed to work over different lines.



sed -z 's/([^)]*)/( )/g' inputfile





share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f340883%2freplace-anything-between-parentheses-even-if-spanning-multiple-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    8 Answers
    8






    active

    oldest

    votes








    8 Answers
    8






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    5














    AWK



    AWK allows executing code-block on range of conditions. In this case, we want to execute gsub() on every line in range from the one that contains ( to the one that contains ).



    $ awk '$0~/[(]/,$0~/[)]/gsub(/line/,"newline");1' input.txt 
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    whatever

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4)

    some other line


    Python (original answer)



    Here's a quick python script that does the job:



    #!/usr/bin/env python3
    from __future__ import print_function
    import sys

    with open(sys.argv[1]) as fp:
    flag = None
    for line in fp:
    clean_line = line.strip()
    if "(" in clean_line: flag = True
    if flag:
    clean_line = clean_line.replace("line","newline")
    print(clean_line)
    if ")" in clean_line: flag = False


    Test run:



    $ cat input.txt 
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (line0

    line1

    lilne2

    line3

    line4)

    some other line
    $ ./edit_function_args.py input.txt
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    line4)

    some other line


    BASH version



    The same script, except rewritten in bash with sed



    #!/bin/bash
    flag=false
    while IFS= read -r line
    do

    if grep -q '(' <<< "$line"
    then
    flag=true
    fi


    if $flag
    then
    line=$(sed 's/line/newline/' <<< "$line")
    fi

    printf "%sn" "$line"


    if grep -q ')' <<< "$line"
    then
    flag=false
    fi

    done < "$1"





    share|improve this answer

























    • Thanks! I am going to check it. In the meantime, do you know by chance any way to do the same thing in shell ? This is mainly because the rest of my script is in bash.

      – Armin
      Jan 28 '17 at 23:35











    • @Armin Sure, can be done. I can rewrite my python script in bash+sed or even awk, but I'm kind of running out of time here - have to leave my work in 20 minutes. I'll edit it and post once i get home. OK ?

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 28 '17 at 23:37











    • @Armin I also threw in an awk version, which is fairly short an simple. Hope that helps

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:15















    5














    AWK



    AWK allows executing code-block on range of conditions. In this case, we want to execute gsub() on every line in range from the one that contains ( to the one that contains ).



    $ awk '$0~/[(]/,$0~/[)]/gsub(/line/,"newline");1' input.txt 
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    whatever

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4)

    some other line


    Python (original answer)



    Here's a quick python script that does the job:



    #!/usr/bin/env python3
    from __future__ import print_function
    import sys

    with open(sys.argv[1]) as fp:
    flag = None
    for line in fp:
    clean_line = line.strip()
    if "(" in clean_line: flag = True
    if flag:
    clean_line = clean_line.replace("line","newline")
    print(clean_line)
    if ")" in clean_line: flag = False


    Test run:



    $ cat input.txt 
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (line0

    line1

    lilne2

    line3

    line4)

    some other line
    $ ./edit_function_args.py input.txt
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    line4)

    some other line


    BASH version



    The same script, except rewritten in bash with sed



    #!/bin/bash
    flag=false
    while IFS= read -r line
    do

    if grep -q '(' <<< "$line"
    then
    flag=true
    fi


    if $flag
    then
    line=$(sed 's/line/newline/' <<< "$line")
    fi

    printf "%sn" "$line"


    if grep -q ')' <<< "$line"
    then
    flag=false
    fi

    done < "$1"





    share|improve this answer

























    • Thanks! I am going to check it. In the meantime, do you know by chance any way to do the same thing in shell ? This is mainly because the rest of my script is in bash.

      – Armin
      Jan 28 '17 at 23:35











    • @Armin Sure, can be done. I can rewrite my python script in bash+sed or even awk, but I'm kind of running out of time here - have to leave my work in 20 minutes. I'll edit it and post once i get home. OK ?

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 28 '17 at 23:37











    • @Armin I also threw in an awk version, which is fairly short an simple. Hope that helps

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:15













    5












    5








    5







    AWK



    AWK allows executing code-block on range of conditions. In this case, we want to execute gsub() on every line in range from the one that contains ( to the one that contains ).



    $ awk '$0~/[(]/,$0~/[)]/gsub(/line/,"newline");1' input.txt 
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    whatever

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4)

    some other line


    Python (original answer)



    Here's a quick python script that does the job:



    #!/usr/bin/env python3
    from __future__ import print_function
    import sys

    with open(sys.argv[1]) as fp:
    flag = None
    for line in fp:
    clean_line = line.strip()
    if "(" in clean_line: flag = True
    if flag:
    clean_line = clean_line.replace("line","newline")
    print(clean_line)
    if ")" in clean_line: flag = False


    Test run:



    $ cat input.txt 
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (line0

    line1

    lilne2

    line3

    line4)

    some other line
    $ ./edit_function_args.py input.txt
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    line4)

    some other line


    BASH version



    The same script, except rewritten in bash with sed



    #!/bin/bash
    flag=false
    while IFS= read -r line
    do

    if grep -q '(' <<< "$line"
    then
    flag=true
    fi


    if $flag
    then
    line=$(sed 's/line/newline/' <<< "$line")
    fi

    printf "%sn" "$line"


    if grep -q ')' <<< "$line"
    then
    flag=false
    fi

    done < "$1"





    share|improve this answer















    AWK



    AWK allows executing code-block on range of conditions. In this case, we want to execute gsub() on every line in range from the one that contains ( to the one that contains ).



    $ awk '$0~/[(]/,$0~/[)]/gsub(/line/,"newline");1' input.txt 
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    whatever

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4)

    some other line


    Python (original answer)



    Here's a quick python script that does the job:



    #!/usr/bin/env python3
    from __future__ import print_function
    import sys

    with open(sys.argv[1]) as fp:
    flag = None
    for line in fp:
    clean_line = line.strip()
    if "(" in clean_line: flag = True
    if flag:
    clean_line = clean_line.replace("line","newline")
    print(clean_line)
    if ")" in clean_line: flag = False


    Test run:



    $ cat input.txt 
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (line0

    line1

    lilne2

    line3

    line4)

    some other line
    $ ./edit_function_args.py input.txt
    another line
    something else

    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    line4)

    some other line


    BASH version



    The same script, except rewritten in bash with sed



    #!/bin/bash
    flag=false
    while IFS= read -r line
    do

    if grep -q '(' <<< "$line"
    then
    flag=true
    fi


    if $flag
    then
    line=$(sed 's/line/newline/' <<< "$line")
    fi

    printf "%sn" "$line"


    if grep -q ')' <<< "$line"
    then
    flag=false
    fi

    done < "$1"






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 29 '17 at 1:15

























    answered Jan 28 '17 at 23:27









    Sergiy KolodyazhnyySergiy Kolodyazhnyy

    10.6k42763




    10.6k42763












    • Thanks! I am going to check it. In the meantime, do you know by chance any way to do the same thing in shell ? This is mainly because the rest of my script is in bash.

      – Armin
      Jan 28 '17 at 23:35











    • @Armin Sure, can be done. I can rewrite my python script in bash+sed or even awk, but I'm kind of running out of time here - have to leave my work in 20 minutes. I'll edit it and post once i get home. OK ?

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 28 '17 at 23:37











    • @Armin I also threw in an awk version, which is fairly short an simple. Hope that helps

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:15

















    • Thanks! I am going to check it. In the meantime, do you know by chance any way to do the same thing in shell ? This is mainly because the rest of my script is in bash.

      – Armin
      Jan 28 '17 at 23:35











    • @Armin Sure, can be done. I can rewrite my python script in bash+sed or even awk, but I'm kind of running out of time here - have to leave my work in 20 minutes. I'll edit it and post once i get home. OK ?

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 28 '17 at 23:37











    • @Armin I also threw in an awk version, which is fairly short an simple. Hope that helps

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:15
















    Thanks! I am going to check it. In the meantime, do you know by chance any way to do the same thing in shell ? This is mainly because the rest of my script is in bash.

    – Armin
    Jan 28 '17 at 23:35





    Thanks! I am going to check it. In the meantime, do you know by chance any way to do the same thing in shell ? This is mainly because the rest of my script is in bash.

    – Armin
    Jan 28 '17 at 23:35













    @Armin Sure, can be done. I can rewrite my python script in bash+sed or even awk, but I'm kind of running out of time here - have to leave my work in 20 minutes. I'll edit it and post once i get home. OK ?

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 28 '17 at 23:37





    @Armin Sure, can be done. I can rewrite my python script in bash+sed or even awk, but I'm kind of running out of time here - have to leave my work in 20 minutes. I'll edit it and post once i get home. OK ?

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 28 '17 at 23:37













    @Armin I also threw in an awk version, which is fairly short an simple. Hope that helps

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:15





    @Armin I also threw in an awk version, which is fairly short an simple. Hope that helps

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:15













    6














    Taking the bash answer of @Serg and converting it to use bash builtins, rather than 2 or 3 processes per line. Processes are cheap but not free!



    #!/bin/bash
    # Use shell builtins, read, true, false, printf
    flag=false
    while IFS= read -r line
    do
    case "$line" in
    (*"("*) flag=true ;;
    esac

    if $flag
    then
    line=$line//line/newline
    fi

    printf "%sn" "$line"

    case "$line" in
    (*")"*) flag=false ;;
    esac

    done < "$1"





    share|improve this answer























    • Heh, OK, pretty good. I'd want to say that on modern systems with plenty of RAM and multi-core processes multiple processes wouldn't be an issue, but it might be useful on legacy systems.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:10











    • *multi-core processors , small typo there

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:20






    • 1





      @Serg, Time it! Multi-core processors don't help as this is all sequential. On a system where each core reports about 5000 bogomips, it takes me about 6 milliseconds to start a sed, read a line, and exit, and 7 milliseconds to start a grep. This assumes that sed and grep are in the system cache. So this means assuming that all other overheads can be ignored you are limited to about 70 lines a second. Because I am ignoring all other overheads I can process at an infinite number of lines a second :-) using shell builtins.

      – icarus
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:47











    • @icarus, how would you change line=$line//line/newline to replace anything in this line with empty space ? Many thanks in advance.

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:16











    • @icarus Eh . . . I somehow doubt shells , even with built-ins, perform noticeably better. If we want speed and performance, then it's job for C or other compiled language, heck maybe even for Python.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 30 '17 at 0:03















    6














    Taking the bash answer of @Serg and converting it to use bash builtins, rather than 2 or 3 processes per line. Processes are cheap but not free!



    #!/bin/bash
    # Use shell builtins, read, true, false, printf
    flag=false
    while IFS= read -r line
    do
    case "$line" in
    (*"("*) flag=true ;;
    esac

    if $flag
    then
    line=$line//line/newline
    fi

    printf "%sn" "$line"

    case "$line" in
    (*")"*) flag=false ;;
    esac

    done < "$1"





    share|improve this answer























    • Heh, OK, pretty good. I'd want to say that on modern systems with plenty of RAM and multi-core processes multiple processes wouldn't be an issue, but it might be useful on legacy systems.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:10











    • *multi-core processors , small typo there

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:20






    • 1





      @Serg, Time it! Multi-core processors don't help as this is all sequential. On a system where each core reports about 5000 bogomips, it takes me about 6 milliseconds to start a sed, read a line, and exit, and 7 milliseconds to start a grep. This assumes that sed and grep are in the system cache. So this means assuming that all other overheads can be ignored you are limited to about 70 lines a second. Because I am ignoring all other overheads I can process at an infinite number of lines a second :-) using shell builtins.

      – icarus
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:47











    • @icarus, how would you change line=$line//line/newline to replace anything in this line with empty space ? Many thanks in advance.

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:16











    • @icarus Eh . . . I somehow doubt shells , even with built-ins, perform noticeably better. If we want speed and performance, then it's job for C or other compiled language, heck maybe even for Python.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 30 '17 at 0:03













    6












    6








    6







    Taking the bash answer of @Serg and converting it to use bash builtins, rather than 2 or 3 processes per line. Processes are cheap but not free!



    #!/bin/bash
    # Use shell builtins, read, true, false, printf
    flag=false
    while IFS= read -r line
    do
    case "$line" in
    (*"("*) flag=true ;;
    esac

    if $flag
    then
    line=$line//line/newline
    fi

    printf "%sn" "$line"

    case "$line" in
    (*")"*) flag=false ;;
    esac

    done < "$1"





    share|improve this answer













    Taking the bash answer of @Serg and converting it to use bash builtins, rather than 2 or 3 processes per line. Processes are cheap but not free!



    #!/bin/bash
    # Use shell builtins, read, true, false, printf
    flag=false
    while IFS= read -r line
    do
    case "$line" in
    (*"("*) flag=true ;;
    esac

    if $flag
    then
    line=$line//line/newline
    fi

    printf "%sn" "$line"

    case "$line" in
    (*")"*) flag=false ;;
    esac

    done < "$1"






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 29 '17 at 0:49









    icarusicarus

    6,12111231




    6,12111231












    • Heh, OK, pretty good. I'd want to say that on modern systems with plenty of RAM and multi-core processes multiple processes wouldn't be an issue, but it might be useful on legacy systems.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:10











    • *multi-core processors , small typo there

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:20






    • 1





      @Serg, Time it! Multi-core processors don't help as this is all sequential. On a system where each core reports about 5000 bogomips, it takes me about 6 milliseconds to start a sed, read a line, and exit, and 7 milliseconds to start a grep. This assumes that sed and grep are in the system cache. So this means assuming that all other overheads can be ignored you are limited to about 70 lines a second. Because I am ignoring all other overheads I can process at an infinite number of lines a second :-) using shell builtins.

      – icarus
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:47











    • @icarus, how would you change line=$line//line/newline to replace anything in this line with empty space ? Many thanks in advance.

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:16











    • @icarus Eh . . . I somehow doubt shells , even with built-ins, perform noticeably better. If we want speed and performance, then it's job for C or other compiled language, heck maybe even for Python.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 30 '17 at 0:03

















    • Heh, OK, pretty good. I'd want to say that on modern systems with plenty of RAM and multi-core processes multiple processes wouldn't be an issue, but it might be useful on legacy systems.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:10











    • *multi-core processors , small typo there

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:20






    • 1





      @Serg, Time it! Multi-core processors don't help as this is all sequential. On a system where each core reports about 5000 bogomips, it takes me about 6 milliseconds to start a sed, read a line, and exit, and 7 milliseconds to start a grep. This assumes that sed and grep are in the system cache. So this means assuming that all other overheads can be ignored you are limited to about 70 lines a second. Because I am ignoring all other overheads I can process at an infinite number of lines a second :-) using shell builtins.

      – icarus
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:47











    • @icarus, how would you change line=$line//line/newline to replace anything in this line with empty space ? Many thanks in advance.

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:16











    • @icarus Eh . . . I somehow doubt shells , even with built-ins, perform noticeably better. If we want speed and performance, then it's job for C or other compiled language, heck maybe even for Python.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 30 '17 at 0:03
















    Heh, OK, pretty good. I'd want to say that on modern systems with plenty of RAM and multi-core processes multiple processes wouldn't be an issue, but it might be useful on legacy systems.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:10





    Heh, OK, pretty good. I'd want to say that on modern systems with plenty of RAM and multi-core processes multiple processes wouldn't be an issue, but it might be useful on legacy systems.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:10













    *multi-core processors , small typo there

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:20





    *multi-core processors , small typo there

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:20




    1




    1





    @Serg, Time it! Multi-core processors don't help as this is all sequential. On a system where each core reports about 5000 bogomips, it takes me about 6 milliseconds to start a sed, read a line, and exit, and 7 milliseconds to start a grep. This assumes that sed and grep are in the system cache. So this means assuming that all other overheads can be ignored you are limited to about 70 lines a second. Because I am ignoring all other overheads I can process at an infinite number of lines a second :-) using shell builtins.

    – icarus
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:47





    @Serg, Time it! Multi-core processors don't help as this is all sequential. On a system where each core reports about 5000 bogomips, it takes me about 6 milliseconds to start a sed, read a line, and exit, and 7 milliseconds to start a grep. This assumes that sed and grep are in the system cache. So this means assuming that all other overheads can be ignored you are limited to about 70 lines a second. Because I am ignoring all other overheads I can process at an infinite number of lines a second :-) using shell builtins.

    – icarus
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:47













    @icarus, how would you change line=$line//line/newline to replace anything in this line with empty space ? Many thanks in advance.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:16





    @icarus, how would you change line=$line//line/newline to replace anything in this line with empty space ? Many thanks in advance.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:16













    @icarus Eh . . . I somehow doubt shells , even with built-ins, perform noticeably better. If we want speed and performance, then it's job for C or other compiled language, heck maybe even for Python.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 30 '17 at 0:03





    @icarus Eh . . . I somehow doubt shells , even with built-ins, perform noticeably better. If we want speed and performance, then it's job for C or other compiled language, heck maybe even for Python.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 30 '17 at 0:03











    5














    If perl solution is okay and file is small enough to be processed as a whole:



    $ perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/$&=~s|line|newline|gr/ge' ip.txt 
    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4)



    • -0777 slurp entire input file


    • ([^)]+) pattern to match - ( followed by non ) characters and ending with )


    • $&=~s|line|newline|gr the matched pattern is referenced here using $& and the desired replacement (line to newline) is done. Note the r flag to return the result as the replacement string


    • e flag allows to use expression instead of string

    • use perl -i -0777 -pe for inplace editing





    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks @Sundeep. Before trying this, please note that I don't know what is the exact value for variable line. How can I say whatever between to parentheses to be replaced by let's say an empty space?

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 20:22












    • @Armin not sure of your question, something like this? perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/( )/g' ip.txt

      – Sundeep
      Jan 30 '17 at 1:51















    5














    If perl solution is okay and file is small enough to be processed as a whole:



    $ perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/$&=~s|line|newline|gr/ge' ip.txt 
    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4)



    • -0777 slurp entire input file


    • ([^)]+) pattern to match - ( followed by non ) characters and ending with )


    • $&=~s|line|newline|gr the matched pattern is referenced here using $& and the desired replacement (line to newline) is done. Note the r flag to return the result as the replacement string


    • e flag allows to use expression instead of string

    • use perl -i -0777 -pe for inplace editing





    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks @Sundeep. Before trying this, please note that I don't know what is the exact value for variable line. How can I say whatever between to parentheses to be replaced by let's say an empty space?

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 20:22












    • @Armin not sure of your question, something like this? perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/( )/g' ip.txt

      – Sundeep
      Jan 30 '17 at 1:51













    5












    5








    5







    If perl solution is okay and file is small enough to be processed as a whole:



    $ perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/$&=~s|line|newline|gr/ge' ip.txt 
    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4)



    • -0777 slurp entire input file


    • ([^)]+) pattern to match - ( followed by non ) characters and ending with )


    • $&=~s|line|newline|gr the matched pattern is referenced here using $& and the desired replacement (line to newline) is done. Note the r flag to return the result as the replacement string


    • e flag allows to use expression instead of string

    • use perl -i -0777 -pe for inplace editing





    share|improve this answer













    If perl solution is okay and file is small enough to be processed as a whole:



    $ perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/$&=~s|line|newline|gr/ge' ip.txt 
    myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4)



    • -0777 slurp entire input file


    • ([^)]+) pattern to match - ( followed by non ) characters and ending with )


    • $&=~s|line|newline|gr the matched pattern is referenced here using $& and the desired replacement (line to newline) is done. Note the r flag to return the result as the replacement string


    • e flag allows to use expression instead of string

    • use perl -i -0777 -pe for inplace editing






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 29 '17 at 5:07









    SundeepSundeep

    7,5161927




    7,5161927












    • Thanks @Sundeep. Before trying this, please note that I don't know what is the exact value for variable line. How can I say whatever between to parentheses to be replaced by let's say an empty space?

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 20:22












    • @Armin not sure of your question, something like this? perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/( )/g' ip.txt

      – Sundeep
      Jan 30 '17 at 1:51

















    • Thanks @Sundeep. Before trying this, please note that I don't know what is the exact value for variable line. How can I say whatever between to parentheses to be replaced by let's say an empty space?

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 20:22












    • @Armin not sure of your question, something like this? perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/( )/g' ip.txt

      – Sundeep
      Jan 30 '17 at 1:51
















    Thanks @Sundeep. Before trying this, please note that I don't know what is the exact value for variable line. How can I say whatever between to parentheses to be replaced by let's say an empty space?

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 20:22






    Thanks @Sundeep. Before trying this, please note that I don't know what is the exact value for variable line. How can I say whatever between to parentheses to be replaced by let's say an empty space?

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 20:22














    @Armin not sure of your question, something like this? perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/( )/g' ip.txt

    – Sundeep
    Jan 30 '17 at 1:51





    @Armin not sure of your question, something like this? perl -0777 -pe 's/([^)]+)/( )/g' ip.txt

    – Sundeep
    Jan 30 '17 at 1:51











    4














    For the question and data as originally presented, a sed 1-liner works



     sed '/(/,/)/s/line/newline/g'


    which says for each region that starts with a line containing an ( and ends with a line containing a ')', substitute globally line for newline. Remove the g if you only want to change the first line on an input line.



    For the modified question,



     sed -e '/(/' -e ':loop;s/(.*)/()/;t;N;b loop' -e ''


    works. It loops over the input,printing it until it finds a (. At this point it tries to change everything inside a ( ) pair including the delimiters to just (). If this succeeds it breaks out of the loop, prints the result and continues. If it didn't manage to do so, usually because it hasn't yet seen the ), it appends the next input line and continues the loop. If you don't want it on one line then writing it as



    sed -e '/(/
    :loop
    s/(.*)/()/
    t
    N
    b loop
    '


    makes it easier to follow.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Pretty good. Gave me idea for a similar awk solution.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:16






    • 1





      As data are presented, even a sed 's/line/newline/g' would do the job....

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:29











    • OK, using the data as presented and the problem description, you need the range limiting. The point of the "data as presented" comment is that it allows us to ignore nesting of parenthesis, and that there are no line before an ( or after a ) that need to be left unchanged.

      – icarus
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:49







    • 1





      @GeorgeVasiliou as presented - yes. But you gotta think one step ahead. OP likely has file with more than just one function. You have to anticipate that there are line words that OP might not want to edit or they are outside of parenthesis

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 2:01






    • 1





      @Serg Yes, sure. I just believe that OP should enrich the question. Even thinking that this is a source code file with lot of functions, the correct question & answer i think should recognize myfunction ( line0 , etc) instead of just (line0,etc )

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 8:51
















    4














    For the question and data as originally presented, a sed 1-liner works



     sed '/(/,/)/s/line/newline/g'


    which says for each region that starts with a line containing an ( and ends with a line containing a ')', substitute globally line for newline. Remove the g if you only want to change the first line on an input line.



    For the modified question,



     sed -e '/(/' -e ':loop;s/(.*)/()/;t;N;b loop' -e ''


    works. It loops over the input,printing it until it finds a (. At this point it tries to change everything inside a ( ) pair including the delimiters to just (). If this succeeds it breaks out of the loop, prints the result and continues. If it didn't manage to do so, usually because it hasn't yet seen the ), it appends the next input line and continues the loop. If you don't want it on one line then writing it as



    sed -e '/(/
    :loop
    s/(.*)/()/
    t
    N
    b loop
    '


    makes it easier to follow.






    share|improve this answer

























    • Pretty good. Gave me idea for a similar awk solution.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:16






    • 1





      As data are presented, even a sed 's/line/newline/g' would do the job....

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:29











    • OK, using the data as presented and the problem description, you need the range limiting. The point of the "data as presented" comment is that it allows us to ignore nesting of parenthesis, and that there are no line before an ( or after a ) that need to be left unchanged.

      – icarus
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:49







    • 1





      @GeorgeVasiliou as presented - yes. But you gotta think one step ahead. OP likely has file with more than just one function. You have to anticipate that there are line words that OP might not want to edit or they are outside of parenthesis

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 2:01






    • 1





      @Serg Yes, sure. I just believe that OP should enrich the question. Even thinking that this is a source code file with lot of functions, the correct question & answer i think should recognize myfunction ( line0 , etc) instead of just (line0,etc )

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 8:51














    4












    4








    4







    For the question and data as originally presented, a sed 1-liner works



     sed '/(/,/)/s/line/newline/g'


    which says for each region that starts with a line containing an ( and ends with a line containing a ')', substitute globally line for newline. Remove the g if you only want to change the first line on an input line.



    For the modified question,



     sed -e '/(/' -e ':loop;s/(.*)/()/;t;N;b loop' -e ''


    works. It loops over the input,printing it until it finds a (. At this point it tries to change everything inside a ( ) pair including the delimiters to just (). If this succeeds it breaks out of the loop, prints the result and continues. If it didn't manage to do so, usually because it hasn't yet seen the ), it appends the next input line and continues the loop. If you don't want it on one line then writing it as



    sed -e '/(/
    :loop
    s/(.*)/()/
    t
    N
    b loop
    '


    makes it easier to follow.






    share|improve this answer















    For the question and data as originally presented, a sed 1-liner works



     sed '/(/,/)/s/line/newline/g'


    which says for each region that starts with a line containing an ( and ends with a line containing a ')', substitute globally line for newline. Remove the g if you only want to change the first line on an input line.



    For the modified question,



     sed -e '/(/' -e ':loop;s/(.*)/()/;t;N;b loop' -e ''


    works. It loops over the input,printing it until it finds a (. At this point it tries to change everything inside a ( ) pair including the delimiters to just (). If this succeeds it breaks out of the loop, prints the result and continues. If it didn't manage to do so, usually because it hasn't yet seen the ), it appends the next input line and continues the loop. If you don't want it on one line then writing it as



    sed -e '/(/
    :loop
    s/(.*)/()/
    t
    N
    b loop
    '


    makes it easier to follow.







    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 30 '17 at 0:21

























    answered Jan 29 '17 at 0:55









    icarusicarus

    6,12111231




    6,12111231












    • Pretty good. Gave me idea for a similar awk solution.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:16






    • 1





      As data are presented, even a sed 's/line/newline/g' would do the job....

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:29











    • OK, using the data as presented and the problem description, you need the range limiting. The point of the "data as presented" comment is that it allows us to ignore nesting of parenthesis, and that there are no line before an ( or after a ) that need to be left unchanged.

      – icarus
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:49







    • 1





      @GeorgeVasiliou as presented - yes. But you gotta think one step ahead. OP likely has file with more than just one function. You have to anticipate that there are line words that OP might not want to edit or they are outside of parenthesis

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 2:01






    • 1





      @Serg Yes, sure. I just believe that OP should enrich the question. Even thinking that this is a source code file with lot of functions, the correct question & answer i think should recognize myfunction ( line0 , etc) instead of just (line0,etc )

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 8:51


















    • Pretty good. Gave me idea for a similar awk solution.

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:16






    • 1





      As data are presented, even a sed 's/line/newline/g' would do the job....

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:29











    • OK, using the data as presented and the problem description, you need the range limiting. The point of the "data as presented" comment is that it allows us to ignore nesting of parenthesis, and that there are no line before an ( or after a ) that need to be left unchanged.

      – icarus
      Jan 29 '17 at 1:49







    • 1





      @GeorgeVasiliou as presented - yes. But you gotta think one step ahead. OP likely has file with more than just one function. You have to anticipate that there are line words that OP might not want to edit or they are outside of parenthesis

      – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
      Jan 29 '17 at 2:01






    • 1





      @Serg Yes, sure. I just believe that OP should enrich the question. Even thinking that this is a source code file with lot of functions, the correct question & answer i think should recognize myfunction ( line0 , etc) instead of just (line0,etc )

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 8:51

















    Pretty good. Gave me idea for a similar awk solution.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:16





    Pretty good. Gave me idea for a similar awk solution.

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:16




    1




    1





    As data are presented, even a sed 's/line/newline/g' would do the job....

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:29





    As data are presented, even a sed 's/line/newline/g' would do the job....

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:29













    OK, using the data as presented and the problem description, you need the range limiting. The point of the "data as presented" comment is that it allows us to ignore nesting of parenthesis, and that there are no line before an ( or after a ) that need to be left unchanged.

    – icarus
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:49






    OK, using the data as presented and the problem description, you need the range limiting. The point of the "data as presented" comment is that it allows us to ignore nesting of parenthesis, and that there are no line before an ( or after a ) that need to be left unchanged.

    – icarus
    Jan 29 '17 at 1:49





    1




    1





    @GeorgeVasiliou as presented - yes. But you gotta think one step ahead. OP likely has file with more than just one function. You have to anticipate that there are line words that OP might not want to edit or they are outside of parenthesis

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 2:01





    @GeorgeVasiliou as presented - yes. But you gotta think one step ahead. OP likely has file with more than just one function. You have to anticipate that there are line words that OP might not want to edit or they are outside of parenthesis

    – Sergiy Kolodyazhnyy
    Jan 29 '17 at 2:01




    1




    1





    @Serg Yes, sure. I just believe that OP should enrich the question. Even thinking that this is a source code file with lot of functions, the correct question & answer i think should recognize myfunction ( line0 , etc) instead of just (line0,etc )

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 8:51






    @Serg Yes, sure. I just believe that OP should enrich the question. Even thinking that this is a source code file with lot of functions, the correct question & answer i think should recognize myfunction ( line0 , etc) instead of just (line0,etc )

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 8:51












    3














    Using awk:

    awk '
    function mysub(str)
    if (str) gsub(/line/, "newline", str); return str

    BEGIN
    OFS=FS="("

    NF>1
    if (FS=="(")
    print $1,mysub($2); OFS=FS=")"
    else
    print mysub($1),$2; OFS=FS="("

    next


    print FS=="(" ? $0 : mysub($0)
    ' /path/to/input


    The custom function mysub is where you do the replacements you want to do between the parentheses. The assumption is that parentheses aren't nested.



    How it works:

    There are two states, inside and outside the parentheses.



    • Outside (the starting state), the input and output separator is set to the opening parenthesis (OFS=FS="(").

    • Once it comes across a line with more than one field separated by the input separator (NF>1) and…

      • …you are currently in the outside mode (FS=="("), everything before and after the field separator is outputted (with the output separator in-between) but with latter going through the replacement function (mysub($2)) and then the the mode is flipped by changing the input and output separators (OFS=FS=")"),

      • …otherwise (else), you are in inside mode, and everything before and after the field separator is outputted but this time with former going through the replacement function (mysub($1)) and the mode flips here as well.


    • On all other lines, the whole line is outputted unchanged if outside (FS=="(") or otherwise goes as a whole through the replacement function (mysub($0)).



    Compressed into a single line:

    awk 'function m(s)gsub(/line/,"newline",s);return sBEGINOFS=FS="("NF>1if(FS=="(")print $1,m($2);OFS=FS=")"elseprint m($1),$2;OFS=FS="("nextprint FS=="("?$0:m($0)' /path/to/input


    My trickier test data (which some the one-liner solutions here will fail with):

    line96
    line97 myFunction (line0

    line1

    line2

    line3

    line4) line98
    line99


    Output for it:

    line96
    line97 myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4) line98
    line99


    Variation where everything between the parentheses is deleted instead (except for the first and last line breaks):

    awk '
    BEGIN
    OFS=FS="("

    NF>1
    if (FS=="(")
    print $1,""; OFS=FS=")"
    else
    print "",$2; OFS=FS="("

    next

    FS=="("' /path/to/input


    Output for this one:

    line96
    line97 myFunction (
    ) line98
    line99





    share|improve this answer

























    • @Armin If this answer solves your problem, would be kind except thanking phk also to accept this answer as a solution.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 0:49











    • Thanks @phk. Would you lease let me know how in this script could I replace "any thing" (not a specific string), with let's say an empty space. Still I am struggling with replacing anyThingMultiLine with empty space between parentheses. I appreciate your help.

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:05











    • @Armin See my latest edit of my answer.

      – phk
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:19
















    3














    Using awk:

    awk '
    function mysub(str)
    if (str) gsub(/line/, "newline", str); return str

    BEGIN
    OFS=FS="("

    NF>1
    if (FS=="(")
    print $1,mysub($2); OFS=FS=")"
    else
    print mysub($1),$2; OFS=FS="("

    next


    print FS=="(" ? $0 : mysub($0)
    ' /path/to/input


    The custom function mysub is where you do the replacements you want to do between the parentheses. The assumption is that parentheses aren't nested.



    How it works:

    There are two states, inside and outside the parentheses.



    • Outside (the starting state), the input and output separator is set to the opening parenthesis (OFS=FS="(").

    • Once it comes across a line with more than one field separated by the input separator (NF>1) and…

      • …you are currently in the outside mode (FS=="("), everything before and after the field separator is outputted (with the output separator in-between) but with latter going through the replacement function (mysub($2)) and then the the mode is flipped by changing the input and output separators (OFS=FS=")"),

      • …otherwise (else), you are in inside mode, and everything before and after the field separator is outputted but this time with former going through the replacement function (mysub($1)) and the mode flips here as well.


    • On all other lines, the whole line is outputted unchanged if outside (FS=="(") or otherwise goes as a whole through the replacement function (mysub($0)).



    Compressed into a single line:

    awk 'function m(s)gsub(/line/,"newline",s);return sBEGINOFS=FS="("NF>1if(FS=="(")print $1,m($2);OFS=FS=")"elseprint m($1),$2;OFS=FS="("nextprint FS=="("?$0:m($0)' /path/to/input


    My trickier test data (which some the one-liner solutions here will fail with):

    line96
    line97 myFunction (line0

    line1

    line2

    line3

    line4) line98
    line99


    Output for it:

    line96
    line97 myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4) line98
    line99


    Variation where everything between the parentheses is deleted instead (except for the first and last line breaks):

    awk '
    BEGIN
    OFS=FS="("

    NF>1
    if (FS=="(")
    print $1,""; OFS=FS=")"
    else
    print "",$2; OFS=FS="("

    next

    FS=="("' /path/to/input


    Output for this one:

    line96
    line97 myFunction (
    ) line98
    line99





    share|improve this answer

























    • @Armin If this answer solves your problem, would be kind except thanking phk also to accept this answer as a solution.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 0:49











    • Thanks @phk. Would you lease let me know how in this script could I replace "any thing" (not a specific string), with let's say an empty space. Still I am struggling with replacing anyThingMultiLine with empty space between parentheses. I appreciate your help.

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:05











    • @Armin See my latest edit of my answer.

      – phk
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:19














    3












    3








    3







    Using awk:

    awk '
    function mysub(str)
    if (str) gsub(/line/, "newline", str); return str

    BEGIN
    OFS=FS="("

    NF>1
    if (FS=="(")
    print $1,mysub($2); OFS=FS=")"
    else
    print mysub($1),$2; OFS=FS="("

    next


    print FS=="(" ? $0 : mysub($0)
    ' /path/to/input


    The custom function mysub is where you do the replacements you want to do between the parentheses. The assumption is that parentheses aren't nested.



    How it works:

    There are two states, inside and outside the parentheses.



    • Outside (the starting state), the input and output separator is set to the opening parenthesis (OFS=FS="(").

    • Once it comes across a line with more than one field separated by the input separator (NF>1) and…

      • …you are currently in the outside mode (FS=="("), everything before and after the field separator is outputted (with the output separator in-between) but with latter going through the replacement function (mysub($2)) and then the the mode is flipped by changing the input and output separators (OFS=FS=")"),

      • …otherwise (else), you are in inside mode, and everything before and after the field separator is outputted but this time with former going through the replacement function (mysub($1)) and the mode flips here as well.


    • On all other lines, the whole line is outputted unchanged if outside (FS=="(") or otherwise goes as a whole through the replacement function (mysub($0)).



    Compressed into a single line:

    awk 'function m(s)gsub(/line/,"newline",s);return sBEGINOFS=FS="("NF>1if(FS=="(")print $1,m($2);OFS=FS=")"elseprint m($1),$2;OFS=FS="("nextprint FS=="("?$0:m($0)' /path/to/input


    My trickier test data (which some the one-liner solutions here will fail with):

    line96
    line97 myFunction (line0

    line1

    line2

    line3

    line4) line98
    line99


    Output for it:

    line96
    line97 myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4) line98
    line99


    Variation where everything between the parentheses is deleted instead (except for the first and last line breaks):

    awk '
    BEGIN
    OFS=FS="("

    NF>1
    if (FS=="(")
    print $1,""; OFS=FS=")"
    else
    print "",$2; OFS=FS="("

    next

    FS=="("' /path/to/input


    Output for this one:

    line96
    line97 myFunction (
    ) line98
    line99





    share|improve this answer















    Using awk:

    awk '
    function mysub(str)
    if (str) gsub(/line/, "newline", str); return str

    BEGIN
    OFS=FS="("

    NF>1
    if (FS=="(")
    print $1,mysub($2); OFS=FS=")"
    else
    print mysub($1),$2; OFS=FS="("

    next


    print FS=="(" ? $0 : mysub($0)
    ' /path/to/input


    The custom function mysub is where you do the replacements you want to do between the parentheses. The assumption is that parentheses aren't nested.



    How it works:

    There are two states, inside and outside the parentheses.



    • Outside (the starting state), the input and output separator is set to the opening parenthesis (OFS=FS="(").

    • Once it comes across a line with more than one field separated by the input separator (NF>1) and…

      • …you are currently in the outside mode (FS=="("), everything before and after the field separator is outputted (with the output separator in-between) but with latter going through the replacement function (mysub($2)) and then the the mode is flipped by changing the input and output separators (OFS=FS=")"),

      • …otherwise (else), you are in inside mode, and everything before and after the field separator is outputted but this time with former going through the replacement function (mysub($1)) and the mode flips here as well.


    • On all other lines, the whole line is outputted unchanged if outside (FS=="(") or otherwise goes as a whole through the replacement function (mysub($0)).



    Compressed into a single line:

    awk 'function m(s)gsub(/line/,"newline",s);return sBEGINOFS=FS="("NF>1if(FS=="(")print $1,m($2);OFS=FS=")"elseprint m($1),$2;OFS=FS="("nextprint FS=="("?$0:m($0)' /path/to/input


    My trickier test data (which some the one-liner solutions here will fail with):

    line96
    line97 myFunction (line0

    line1

    line2

    line3

    line4) line98
    line99


    Output for it:

    line96
    line97 myFunction (newline0

    newline1

    newline2

    newline3

    newline4) line98
    line99


    Variation where everything between the parentheses is deleted instead (except for the first and last line breaks):

    awk '
    BEGIN
    OFS=FS="("

    NF>1
    if (FS=="(")
    print $1,""; OFS=FS=")"
    else
    print "",$2; OFS=FS="("

    next

    FS=="("' /path/to/input


    Output for this one:

    line96
    line97 myFunction (
    ) line98
    line99






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 30 '17 at 16:22

























    answered Jan 28 '17 at 23:46









    phkphk

    4,04852255




    4,04852255












    • @Armin If this answer solves your problem, would be kind except thanking phk also to accept this answer as a solution.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 0:49











    • Thanks @phk. Would you lease let me know how in this script could I replace "any thing" (not a specific string), with let's say an empty space. Still I am struggling with replacing anyThingMultiLine with empty space between parentheses. I appreciate your help.

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:05











    • @Armin See my latest edit of my answer.

      – phk
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:19


















    • @Armin If this answer solves your problem, would be kind except thanking phk also to accept this answer as a solution.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 0:49











    • Thanks @phk. Would you lease let me know how in this script could I replace "any thing" (not a specific string), with let's say an empty space. Still I am struggling with replacing anyThingMultiLine with empty space between parentheses. I appreciate your help.

      – Armin
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:05











    • @Armin See my latest edit of my answer.

      – phk
      Jan 29 '17 at 21:19

















    @Armin If this answer solves your problem, would be kind except thanking phk also to accept this answer as a solution.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 0:49





    @Armin If this answer solves your problem, would be kind except thanking phk also to accept this answer as a solution.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 0:49













    Thanks @phk. Would you lease let me know how in this script could I replace "any thing" (not a specific string), with let's say an empty space. Still I am struggling with replacing anyThingMultiLine with empty space between parentheses. I appreciate your help.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:05





    Thanks @phk. Would you lease let me know how in this script could I replace "any thing" (not a specific string), with let's say an empty space. Still I am struggling with replacing anyThingMultiLine with empty space between parentheses. I appreciate your help.

    – Armin
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:05













    @Armin See my latest edit of my answer.

    – phk
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:19






    @Armin See my latest edit of my answer.

    – phk
    Jan 29 '17 at 21:19












    2














    Combining all the clarifications, comments and revised data, my offer would be like bellow.



    First of all lets consider a source file d.txt containing your advised myFunction (...) plus one more function to be more realistic.

    To be on the hard side lets suppose that those two functions in this d.txt file have almost identical contents, like this:



    $ cat d.txt
    myOtherFunction (x as boolean
    y as integer
    d as string
    e as whatever)

    myFunction (xx as boolean
    yy as integer
    dd as string
    ee as whatever)


    Lets suppose now that in another file d2.txt we have a different function.



    $ cat d2.txt
    BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
    yyy as boolean
    ddd as integer
    eee as whatever)


    Forgetting the sample names of line, newline , etc , and considering your comments it seems that what you really want is to replace in your initial source code file d.txt the existing myFunction (..) with the BrandNewFunction (...) present in file d2.txt.



    This can be done easily using pure bash:



    $ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)" #isolates myFunction from the source file d.txt
    $ b="$(cat d2.txt)" #get contents of file d2.txt (BrandNewFunction)
    $ c="$(cat d.txt)" #get the whole source file d.txt
    $ echo "$c/$a/$b" #in source file d.txt ($c) replace $a with $b (d2.txt)
    #Output:
    myOtherFunction (x as boolean
    y as integer
    d as string
    e as whatever)

    BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
    yyy as boolean
    ddd as integer
    eee as whatever)


    Or even as one-liner:



    $ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)";b="$(cat d2.txt)";c="$(cat d.txt)";echo "$c/$a/$b"


    Above command just prints on your screen the replacement results (echo). To save the results just send echo to >d.txt for overwritting the existing file or even a new file if you like.



    Sed seems not to be quite good to replace multiple lines separated by newlines, since it is focused on line operations.



    AWK should be good for the job, but i'm not good in AWK.



    Bash is the easiest solution, which can successfully replace multilines.



    PS1: If file d2.txt contains more functions and you want to isolate the BrandNewFunction (..), similarly to source file d.txt you just need to modify the $b variable definition like this:



    $ b="$(sed -n '/BrandNewFunction (/,/)/p' d2.txt)"


    PS2: If you just want to replace myFunction (...) of source file d.txt with a blank function of the same name, you can just hardcode variable b like this (you know already which function from source file d.txt you want to delete, right?)



    $ b="myFunction ( )" 





    share|improve this answer

























    • @Armin This solution should cover you entirely.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 23:54











    • @Armin It would be kind to leave a comment just to advise what made you unaccept this answer. It would help me to improve future answers on similar posts.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 18:30











    • @Georges, indeed I used parts of your code to complete mine. Specially sed -n idea was very good. I didn't do a copy-past of the entire thing that you proposed, by I certainly used part of it. Please accept my apologies if I miss something as I am really new in this community. Thanks anyways for all your very useful advices.

      – Armin
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:24











    • @Armin Ok. I just got happy yesterday to see that you accepted my answer as a solution (maybe by mistake) and got unhappy today to see that my answer was unaccepted. Anyway, is your right to accept the best answer for you.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:32











    • @Armin I think that you also changed the accepted answer again. Yesterday you accept my answer, this afternoon you unaccept my answer and you accept the perl solution of Sundeep and now i can see that you also unaccept Sundeep solution and you accepted dirkt solution. You can upvote all solutions if you like them but you can accept only one solution. Do not hop around :-)

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:37















    2














    Combining all the clarifications, comments and revised data, my offer would be like bellow.



    First of all lets consider a source file d.txt containing your advised myFunction (...) plus one more function to be more realistic.

    To be on the hard side lets suppose that those two functions in this d.txt file have almost identical contents, like this:



    $ cat d.txt
    myOtherFunction (x as boolean
    y as integer
    d as string
    e as whatever)

    myFunction (xx as boolean
    yy as integer
    dd as string
    ee as whatever)


    Lets suppose now that in another file d2.txt we have a different function.



    $ cat d2.txt
    BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
    yyy as boolean
    ddd as integer
    eee as whatever)


    Forgetting the sample names of line, newline , etc , and considering your comments it seems that what you really want is to replace in your initial source code file d.txt the existing myFunction (..) with the BrandNewFunction (...) present in file d2.txt.



    This can be done easily using pure bash:



    $ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)" #isolates myFunction from the source file d.txt
    $ b="$(cat d2.txt)" #get contents of file d2.txt (BrandNewFunction)
    $ c="$(cat d.txt)" #get the whole source file d.txt
    $ echo "$c/$a/$b" #in source file d.txt ($c) replace $a with $b (d2.txt)
    #Output:
    myOtherFunction (x as boolean
    y as integer
    d as string
    e as whatever)

    BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
    yyy as boolean
    ddd as integer
    eee as whatever)


    Or even as one-liner:



    $ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)";b="$(cat d2.txt)";c="$(cat d.txt)";echo "$c/$a/$b"


    Above command just prints on your screen the replacement results (echo). To save the results just send echo to >d.txt for overwritting the existing file or even a new file if you like.



    Sed seems not to be quite good to replace multiple lines separated by newlines, since it is focused on line operations.



    AWK should be good for the job, but i'm not good in AWK.



    Bash is the easiest solution, which can successfully replace multilines.



    PS1: If file d2.txt contains more functions and you want to isolate the BrandNewFunction (..), similarly to source file d.txt you just need to modify the $b variable definition like this:



    $ b="$(sed -n '/BrandNewFunction (/,/)/p' d2.txt)"


    PS2: If you just want to replace myFunction (...) of source file d.txt with a blank function of the same name, you can just hardcode variable b like this (you know already which function from source file d.txt you want to delete, right?)



    $ b="myFunction ( )" 





    share|improve this answer

























    • @Armin This solution should cover you entirely.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 23:54











    • @Armin It would be kind to leave a comment just to advise what made you unaccept this answer. It would help me to improve future answers on similar posts.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 18:30











    • @Georges, indeed I used parts of your code to complete mine. Specially sed -n idea was very good. I didn't do a copy-past of the entire thing that you proposed, by I certainly used part of it. Please accept my apologies if I miss something as I am really new in this community. Thanks anyways for all your very useful advices.

      – Armin
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:24











    • @Armin Ok. I just got happy yesterday to see that you accepted my answer as a solution (maybe by mistake) and got unhappy today to see that my answer was unaccepted. Anyway, is your right to accept the best answer for you.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:32











    • @Armin I think that you also changed the accepted answer again. Yesterday you accept my answer, this afternoon you unaccept my answer and you accept the perl solution of Sundeep and now i can see that you also unaccept Sundeep solution and you accepted dirkt solution. You can upvote all solutions if you like them but you can accept only one solution. Do not hop around :-)

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:37













    2












    2








    2







    Combining all the clarifications, comments and revised data, my offer would be like bellow.



    First of all lets consider a source file d.txt containing your advised myFunction (...) plus one more function to be more realistic.

    To be on the hard side lets suppose that those two functions in this d.txt file have almost identical contents, like this:



    $ cat d.txt
    myOtherFunction (x as boolean
    y as integer
    d as string
    e as whatever)

    myFunction (xx as boolean
    yy as integer
    dd as string
    ee as whatever)


    Lets suppose now that in another file d2.txt we have a different function.



    $ cat d2.txt
    BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
    yyy as boolean
    ddd as integer
    eee as whatever)


    Forgetting the sample names of line, newline , etc , and considering your comments it seems that what you really want is to replace in your initial source code file d.txt the existing myFunction (..) with the BrandNewFunction (...) present in file d2.txt.



    This can be done easily using pure bash:



    $ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)" #isolates myFunction from the source file d.txt
    $ b="$(cat d2.txt)" #get contents of file d2.txt (BrandNewFunction)
    $ c="$(cat d.txt)" #get the whole source file d.txt
    $ echo "$c/$a/$b" #in source file d.txt ($c) replace $a with $b (d2.txt)
    #Output:
    myOtherFunction (x as boolean
    y as integer
    d as string
    e as whatever)

    BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
    yyy as boolean
    ddd as integer
    eee as whatever)


    Or even as one-liner:



    $ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)";b="$(cat d2.txt)";c="$(cat d.txt)";echo "$c/$a/$b"


    Above command just prints on your screen the replacement results (echo). To save the results just send echo to >d.txt for overwritting the existing file or even a new file if you like.



    Sed seems not to be quite good to replace multiple lines separated by newlines, since it is focused on line operations.



    AWK should be good for the job, but i'm not good in AWK.



    Bash is the easiest solution, which can successfully replace multilines.



    PS1: If file d2.txt contains more functions and you want to isolate the BrandNewFunction (..), similarly to source file d.txt you just need to modify the $b variable definition like this:



    $ b="$(sed -n '/BrandNewFunction (/,/)/p' d2.txt)"


    PS2: If you just want to replace myFunction (...) of source file d.txt with a blank function of the same name, you can just hardcode variable b like this (you know already which function from source file d.txt you want to delete, right?)



    $ b="myFunction ( )" 





    share|improve this answer















    Combining all the clarifications, comments and revised data, my offer would be like bellow.



    First of all lets consider a source file d.txt containing your advised myFunction (...) plus one more function to be more realistic.

    To be on the hard side lets suppose that those two functions in this d.txt file have almost identical contents, like this:



    $ cat d.txt
    myOtherFunction (x as boolean
    y as integer
    d as string
    e as whatever)

    myFunction (xx as boolean
    yy as integer
    dd as string
    ee as whatever)


    Lets suppose now that in another file d2.txt we have a different function.



    $ cat d2.txt
    BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
    yyy as boolean
    ddd as integer
    eee as whatever)


    Forgetting the sample names of line, newline , etc , and considering your comments it seems that what you really want is to replace in your initial source code file d.txt the existing myFunction (..) with the BrandNewFunction (...) present in file d2.txt.



    This can be done easily using pure bash:



    $ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)" #isolates myFunction from the source file d.txt
    $ b="$(cat d2.txt)" #get contents of file d2.txt (BrandNewFunction)
    $ c="$(cat d.txt)" #get the whole source file d.txt
    $ echo "$c/$a/$b" #in source file d.txt ($c) replace $a with $b (d2.txt)
    #Output:
    myOtherFunction (x as boolean
    y as integer
    d as string
    e as whatever)

    BrandNewFunction (xxx as integer
    yyy as boolean
    ddd as integer
    eee as whatever)


    Or even as one-liner:



    $ a="$(sed -n '/myFunction (/,/)/p' d.txt)";b="$(cat d2.txt)";c="$(cat d.txt)";echo "$c/$a/$b"


    Above command just prints on your screen the replacement results (echo). To save the results just send echo to >d.txt for overwritting the existing file or even a new file if you like.



    Sed seems not to be quite good to replace multiple lines separated by newlines, since it is focused on line operations.



    AWK should be good for the job, but i'm not good in AWK.



    Bash is the easiest solution, which can successfully replace multilines.



    PS1: If file d2.txt contains more functions and you want to isolate the BrandNewFunction (..), similarly to source file d.txt you just need to modify the $b variable definition like this:



    $ b="$(sed -n '/BrandNewFunction (/,/)/p' d2.txt)"


    PS2: If you just want to replace myFunction (...) of source file d.txt with a blank function of the same name, you can just hardcode variable b like this (you know already which function from source file d.txt you want to delete, right?)



    $ b="myFunction ( )" 






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited Jan 29 '17 at 23:52

























    answered Jan 29 '17 at 23:45









    George VasiliouGeorge Vasiliou

    5,71531030




    5,71531030












    • @Armin This solution should cover you entirely.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 23:54











    • @Armin It would be kind to leave a comment just to advise what made you unaccept this answer. It would help me to improve future answers on similar posts.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 18:30











    • @Georges, indeed I used parts of your code to complete mine. Specially sed -n idea was very good. I didn't do a copy-past of the entire thing that you proposed, by I certainly used part of it. Please accept my apologies if I miss something as I am really new in this community. Thanks anyways for all your very useful advices.

      – Armin
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:24











    • @Armin Ok. I just got happy yesterday to see that you accepted my answer as a solution (maybe by mistake) and got unhappy today to see that my answer was unaccepted. Anyway, is your right to accept the best answer for you.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:32











    • @Armin I think that you also changed the accepted answer again. Yesterday you accept my answer, this afternoon you unaccept my answer and you accept the perl solution of Sundeep and now i can see that you also unaccept Sundeep solution and you accepted dirkt solution. You can upvote all solutions if you like them but you can accept only one solution. Do not hop around :-)

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:37

















    • @Armin This solution should cover you entirely.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 29 '17 at 23:54











    • @Armin It would be kind to leave a comment just to advise what made you unaccept this answer. It would help me to improve future answers on similar posts.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 18:30











    • @Georges, indeed I used parts of your code to complete mine. Specially sed -n idea was very good. I didn't do a copy-past of the entire thing that you proposed, by I certainly used part of it. Please accept my apologies if I miss something as I am really new in this community. Thanks anyways for all your very useful advices.

      – Armin
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:24











    • @Armin Ok. I just got happy yesterday to see that you accepted my answer as a solution (maybe by mistake) and got unhappy today to see that my answer was unaccepted. Anyway, is your right to accept the best answer for you.

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:32











    • @Armin I think that you also changed the accepted answer again. Yesterday you accept my answer, this afternoon you unaccept my answer and you accept the perl solution of Sundeep and now i can see that you also unaccept Sundeep solution and you accepted dirkt solution. You can upvote all solutions if you like them but you can accept only one solution. Do not hop around :-)

      – George Vasiliou
      Jan 31 '17 at 22:37
















    @Armin This solution should cover you entirely.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 23:54





    @Armin This solution should cover you entirely.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 29 '17 at 23:54













    @Armin It would be kind to leave a comment just to advise what made you unaccept this answer. It would help me to improve future answers on similar posts.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 18:30





    @Armin It would be kind to leave a comment just to advise what made you unaccept this answer. It would help me to improve future answers on similar posts.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 18:30













    @Georges, indeed I used parts of your code to complete mine. Specially sed -n idea was very good. I didn't do a copy-past of the entire thing that you proposed, by I certainly used part of it. Please accept my apologies if I miss something as I am really new in this community. Thanks anyways for all your very useful advices.

    – Armin
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:24





    @Georges, indeed I used parts of your code to complete mine. Specially sed -n idea was very good. I didn't do a copy-past of the entire thing that you proposed, by I certainly used part of it. Please accept my apologies if I miss something as I am really new in this community. Thanks anyways for all your very useful advices.

    – Armin
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:24













    @Armin Ok. I just got happy yesterday to see that you accepted my answer as a solution (maybe by mistake) and got unhappy today to see that my answer was unaccepted. Anyway, is your right to accept the best answer for you.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:32





    @Armin Ok. I just got happy yesterday to see that you accepted my answer as a solution (maybe by mistake) and got unhappy today to see that my answer was unaccepted. Anyway, is your right to accept the best answer for you.

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:32













    @Armin I think that you also changed the accepted answer again. Yesterday you accept my answer, this afternoon you unaccept my answer and you accept the perl solution of Sundeep and now i can see that you also unaccept Sundeep solution and you accepted dirkt solution. You can upvote all solutions if you like them but you can accept only one solution. Do not hop around :-)

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:37





    @Armin I think that you also changed the accepted answer again. Yesterday you accept my answer, this afternoon you unaccept my answer and you accept the perl solution of Sundeep and now i can see that you also unaccept Sundeep solution and you accepted dirkt solution. You can upvote all solutions if you like them but you can accept only one solution. Do not hop around :-)

    – George Vasiliou
    Jan 31 '17 at 22:37











    2














    If you also want to process nested parenthesis correctly, use a tool for a context-free language instead of a regular language, for example sgrep:



    sgrep -o '%r ' '(start .. end) extracting ("("__")")' < input_file


    This way, for example, the following



    myFunction (line0

    line1

    (line2)

    line3

    line4)

    anotherFun (x y)


    becomes



    myFunction ( ) 

    anotherFun ( )





    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks @dirkt. Unfortunately still I don't have sgrep on my machine properly installed.

      – Armin
      Jan 30 '17 at 22:37











    • Thanks @everyone. Eventually I had to use a combination of the solutions and tricks that you had proposed. Here is the algorithm that I implemented successfully in bash: (a) read line by line the file to detect myFunction and its contents, (b) commented myFunction using sed, (c) inserted new myFunction in the right place using a combination of sed and print.

      – Armin
      Jan 31 '17 at 21:22
















    2














    If you also want to process nested parenthesis correctly, use a tool for a context-free language instead of a regular language, for example sgrep:



    sgrep -o '%r ' '(start .. end) extracting ("("__")")' < input_file


    This way, for example, the following



    myFunction (line0

    line1

    (line2)

    line3

    line4)

    anotherFun (x y)


    becomes



    myFunction ( ) 

    anotherFun ( )





    share|improve this answer























    • Thanks @dirkt. Unfortunately still I don't have sgrep on my machine properly installed.

      – Armin
      Jan 30 '17 at 22:37











    • Thanks @everyone. Eventually I had to use a combination of the solutions and tricks that you had proposed. Here is the algorithm that I implemented successfully in bash: (a) read line by line the file to detect myFunction and its contents, (b) commented myFunction using sed, (c) inserted new myFunction in the right place using a combination of sed and print.

      – Armin
      Jan 31 '17 at 21:22














    2












    2








    2







    If you also want to process nested parenthesis correctly, use a tool for a context-free language instead of a regular language, for example sgrep:



    sgrep -o '%r ' '(start .. end) extracting ("("__")")' < input_file


    This way, for example, the following



    myFunction (line0

    line1

    (line2)

    line3

    line4)

    anotherFun (x y)


    becomes



    myFunction ( ) 

    anotherFun ( )





    share|improve this answer













    If you also want to process nested parenthesis correctly, use a tool for a context-free language instead of a regular language, for example sgrep:



    sgrep -o '%r ' '(start .. end) extracting ("("__")")' < input_file


    This way, for example, the following



    myFunction (line0

    line1

    (line2)

    line3

    line4)

    anotherFun (x y)


    becomes



    myFunction ( ) 

    anotherFun ( )






    share|improve this answer












    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer










    answered Jan 30 '17 at 18:59









    dirktdirkt

    17.3k31338




    17.3k31338












    • Thanks @dirkt. Unfortunately still I don't have sgrep on my machine properly installed.

      – Armin
      Jan 30 '17 at 22:37











    • Thanks @everyone. Eventually I had to use a combination of the solutions and tricks that you had proposed. Here is the algorithm that I implemented successfully in bash: (a) read line by line the file to detect myFunction and its contents, (b) commented myFunction using sed, (c) inserted new myFunction in the right place using a combination of sed and print.

      – Armin
      Jan 31 '17 at 21:22


















    • Thanks @dirkt. Unfortunately still I don't have sgrep on my machine properly installed.

      – Armin
      Jan 30 '17 at 22:37











    • Thanks @everyone. Eventually I had to use a combination of the solutions and tricks that you had proposed. Here is the algorithm that I implemented successfully in bash: (a) read line by line the file to detect myFunction and its contents, (b) commented myFunction using sed, (c) inserted new myFunction in the right place using a combination of sed and print.

      – Armin
      Jan 31 '17 at 21:22

















    Thanks @dirkt. Unfortunately still I don't have sgrep on my machine properly installed.

    – Armin
    Jan 30 '17 at 22:37





    Thanks @dirkt. Unfortunately still I don't have sgrep on my machine properly installed.

    – Armin
    Jan 30 '17 at 22:37













    Thanks @everyone. Eventually I had to use a combination of the solutions and tricks that you had proposed. Here is the algorithm that I implemented successfully in bash: (a) read line by line the file to detect myFunction and its contents, (b) commented myFunction using sed, (c) inserted new myFunction in the right place using a combination of sed and print.

    – Armin
    Jan 31 '17 at 21:22






    Thanks @everyone. Eventually I had to use a combination of the solutions and tricks that you had proposed. Here is the algorithm that I implemented successfully in bash: (a) read line by line the file to detect myFunction and its contents, (b) commented myFunction using sed, (c) inserted new myFunction in the right place using a combination of sed and print.

    – Armin
    Jan 31 '17 at 21:22












    0














    A new version of GNU sed supports the -z option.




    Normally, sed reads a line by reading a string of characters up to the end-of-line character (new line or carriage return).

    The GNU version of sed added a feature in version 4.2.2 to use the "NULL" character instead. This can be useful if you have files that use the NULL as a record separator. Some GNU utilities can genertae output that uses a NULL instead a new line, such as "find . -print0" or "grep -lZ".




    You can use this option when you want sed to work over different lines.



    sed -z 's/([^)]*)/( )/g' inputfile





    share|improve this answer



























      0














      A new version of GNU sed supports the -z option.




      Normally, sed reads a line by reading a string of characters up to the end-of-line character (new line or carriage return).

      The GNU version of sed added a feature in version 4.2.2 to use the "NULL" character instead. This can be useful if you have files that use the NULL as a record separator. Some GNU utilities can genertae output that uses a NULL instead a new line, such as "find . -print0" or "grep -lZ".




      You can use this option when you want sed to work over different lines.



      sed -z 's/([^)]*)/( )/g' inputfile





      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        A new version of GNU sed supports the -z option.




        Normally, sed reads a line by reading a string of characters up to the end-of-line character (new line or carriage return).

        The GNU version of sed added a feature in version 4.2.2 to use the "NULL" character instead. This can be useful if you have files that use the NULL as a record separator. Some GNU utilities can genertae output that uses a NULL instead a new line, such as "find . -print0" or "grep -lZ".




        You can use this option when you want sed to work over different lines.



        sed -z 's/([^)]*)/( )/g' inputfile





        share|improve this answer













        A new version of GNU sed supports the -z option.




        Normally, sed reads a line by reading a string of characters up to the end-of-line character (new line or carriage return).

        The GNU version of sed added a feature in version 4.2.2 to use the "NULL" character instead. This can be useful if you have files that use the NULL as a record separator. Some GNU utilities can genertae output that uses a NULL instead a new line, such as "find . -print0" or "grep -lZ".




        You can use this option when you want sed to work over different lines.



        sed -z 's/([^)]*)/( )/g' inputfile






        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered yesterday









        Walter AWalter A

        514210




        514210



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f340883%2freplace-anything-between-parentheses-even-if-spanning-multiple-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

            NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

            대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495