Workaholic Formal/Informal The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFormal and informal letters formatIs tricky a formal word?Formal words for “can”A formal way to request for updated information in business email writing“Is it okay for you?” Is this phrase considered formal in school/college setting?Have the newspapers started using Informal Language?Literary words vs Formal English and ArchaismsFormal word/phrase for the informal question tag “right?”Can I use “so on” in formal writing?“out and out, all in all” are they formal or informal?
Do scriptures give a method to recognize a truly self-realized person/jivanmukta?
How to use ReplaceAll on an expression that contains a rule
It is correct to match light sources with the same color temperature?
Can I calculate next year's exemptions based on this year's refund/amount owed?
What is the process for purifying your home if you believe it may have been previously used for pagan worship?
How to Implement Deterministic Encryption Safely in .NET
Spaces in which all closed sets are regular closed
Is fine stranded wire ok for main supply line?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
how one can write a nice vector parser, something that does pgfvecparseA=B-C; D=E x F;
Does higher Oxidation/ reduction potential translate to higher energy storage in battery?
Where do students learn to solve polynomial equations these days?
Can this note be analyzed as a non-chord tone?
what's the use of '% to gdp' type of variables?
Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!
"Eavesdropping" vs "Listen in on"
What CSS properties can the br tag have?
Is it convenient to ask the journal's editor for two additional days to complete a review?
Is dried pee considered dirt?
Reshaping json / reparing json inside shell script (remove trailing comma)
TikZ: How to fill area with a special pattern?
How to avoid supervisors with prejudiced views?
What does "shotgun unity" refer to here in this sentence?
Do I need to write [sic] when including a quotation with a number less than 10 that isn't written out?
Workaholic Formal/Informal
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowFormal and informal letters formatIs tricky a formal word?Formal words for “can”A formal way to request for updated information in business email writing“Is it okay for you?” Is this phrase considered formal in school/college setting?Have the newspapers started using Informal Language?Literary words vs Formal English and ArchaismsFormal word/phrase for the informal question tag “right?”Can I use “so on” in formal writing?“out and out, all in all” are they formal or informal?
Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?
for example:
Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.
formal-language
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?
for example:
Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.
formal-language
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?
for example:
Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.
formal-language
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Can I use the word "Workaholic" in formal writing?
for example:
Workaholics may neglect their families and friends.
formal-language
formal-language
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
asked 2 days ago
Lutfur RahmanLutfur Rahman
1057
1057
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
2 days ago
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "481"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202984%2fworkaholic-formal-informal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
It's quite an informal term, and I wouldn't expect to see if in formal writing.
What you could easily do, however, is phrase it as:
So-called "workaholics" may neglect their families and friends.
It's a term that is widely used, and you're still referencing it. But because of its formality (or lack thereof), you're not including it as part of your wording.
Alternatively, be more descriptive:
Those who work significantly longer hours may neglect their families and friends.
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
answered 2 days ago
DanDan
1,828412
1,828412
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
thanks a lot. apart from answering my question you also showed me a way of incorporating some unusual words in formal writings which i didn't know before. Can you elaborate on this more? another sentence coming to my mind: '' so-called ''fanatics'' of sports clubs''. can i use these kinds of sentences in formal writing?
– Lutfur Rahman
2 days ago
1
1
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
I've heard that phrase format used many times in formal settings, yes. Perhaps the most common lately has been when referring to "the so-called Islamic State." The reasoning for this was that the group call themselves that, and others might too, but the media did not wish to use that language themselves and therefore give it credence.
– Dan
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
@Lutfur Rahman: I suggest you avoid using "scare quotes" in formal contexts. Particularly, in constructions such as so-called "[Xs]", which almost always carries negative associations (it's effectively "emotive language", which is discouraged in most formal texts).
– FumbleFingers
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
I like this approach, but, what you would really want to do is use either the scare quotes or the so-called, but not both (in other words, not the so-called "scare quotes"). (See Point #3 in this Writing Blog.)
– J.R.♦
2 days ago
add a comment |
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
2 days ago
add a comment |
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
2 days ago
add a comment |
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
I think it’s an informal term.
There are simple and expressive alternatives you could use in formal settings.
hard worker
hard-working person
(very/extremely) diligent worker
industrious worker
They all have a positive connotation.
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
answered 2 days ago
Andrew TobilkoAndrew Tobilko
2,339624
2,339624
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
2 days ago
add a comment |
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
2 days ago
5
5
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
Whilst I agree that there are other more formal replacements, I don't think that any of those suggestions convey the intensity of "workaholic." One can be a diligent, industrious, hard worker and not be a workaholic.
– Dan
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
2 days ago
I think the word workaholic generally comes with negative connotations; it certainly seems to do so in the example given in the question. I think all the suggestions in this answer are thereby disqualified.
– David K
2 days ago
add a comment |
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Lutfur Rahman is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f202984%2fworkaholic-formal-informal%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
