repository not signed error with sourcelist The Next CEO of Stack OverflowUpdate not working properlySample /etc/apt/sources.list for Linux Mint 17uninitialized constant XML::SaxParser / Error retrieving bug reports from the serverDebian security updatesapt pinning priority restricted`apt update` failed on Debian LinuxError from Mint - repository does not have a Release fileHow to get rid of a PPA?Apt-get upgrade errorcan't install ecodmsserver on crunchbang++ / Debian 9 stretch distro
Expressing the idea of having a very busy time
Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?
Physiological effects of huge anime eyes
Are the names of these months realistic?
Help! I cannot understand this game’s notations!
Defamation due to breach of confidentiality
Does higher Oxidation/ reduction potential translate to higher energy storage in battery?
Is there a way to save my career from absolute disaster?
Is it ok to trim down a tube patch?
Computationally populating tables with probability data
Is there a difference between "Fahrstuhl" and "Aufzug"?
Help understanding this unsettling image of Titan, Epimetheus, and Saturn's rings?
How do I fit a non linear curve?
Audio Conversion With ADS1243
What is the difference between "hamstring tendon" and "common hamstring tendon"?
How did Beeri the Hittite come up with naming his daughter Yehudit?
Is it correct to say moon starry nights?
Help/tips for a first time writer?
My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?
Is there an equivalent of cd - for cp or mv
What flight has the highest ratio of timezone difference to flight time?
Film where the government was corrupt with aliens, people sent to kill aliens are given rigged visors not showing the right aliens
Does the Idaho Potato Commission associate potato skins with healthy eating?
In the "Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix" video game, what potion is used to sabotage Umbridge's speakers?
repository not signed error with sourcelist
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowUpdate not working properlySample /etc/apt/sources.list for Linux Mint 17uninitialized constant XML::SaxParser / Error retrieving bug reports from the serverDebian security updatesapt pinning priority restricted`apt update` failed on Debian LinuxError from Mint - repository does not have a Release fileHow to get rid of a PPA?Apt-get upgrade errorcan't install ecodmsserver on crunchbang++ / Debian 9 stretch distro
I am getting this weird error when I'm trying to execute apt update on linux mint.
Any recommendations how i can fix this?
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid Release' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
This is my sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Linux Mint 19.1 _Tessa_ - Release amd64 20181217]/ bionic contrib main non-free
deb http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
linux-mint apt
asked 2 days ago
RaffaelRaffael
11
New contributor
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I am getting this weird error when I'm trying to execute apt update on linux mint.
Any recommendations how i can fix this?
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid Release' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
This is my sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Linux Mint 19.1 _Tessa_ - Release amd64 20181217]/ bionic contrib main non-free
deb http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
linux-mint apt
asked 2 days ago
RaffaelRaffael
11
New contributor
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I do not think Ubuntu 10.04 repositories are going to be active at this point. Are you using Linux Mint or Ubuntu? Please edit your post with the contents of your sources.list and please clarify what your Operating system is. Thank you!
– kemotep
2 days ago
add a comment |
I am getting this weird error when I'm trying to execute apt update on linux mint.
Any recommendations how i can fix this?
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid Release' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
This is my sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Linux Mint 19.1 _Tessa_ - Release amd64 20181217]/ bionic contrib main non-free
deb http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
linux-mint apt
asked 2 days ago
RaffaelRaffael
11
New contributor
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I am getting this weird error when I'm trying to execute apt update on linux mint.
Any recommendations how i can fix this?
Reading package lists... Done
E: The repository 'http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid Release' is not signed.
N: Updating from such a repository can't be done securely, and is therefore disabled by default.
N: See apt-secure(8) manpage for repository creation and user configuration details.
This is my sources.list
#deb cdrom:[Linux Mint 19.1 _Tessa_ - Release amd64 20181217]/ bionic contrib main non-free
deb http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
linux-mint apt
linux-mint apt
asked 2 days ago
RaffaelRaffael
11
New contributor
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
RaffaelRaffael
11
New contributor
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited yesterday
Raffael
asked 2 days ago
RaffaelRaffael
11
New contributor
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 2 days ago
RaffaelRaffael
11
asked 2 days ago
RaffaelRaffael
11
11
New contributor
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Raffael is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I do not think Ubuntu 10.04 repositories are going to be active at this point. Are you using Linux Mint or Ubuntu? Please edit your post with the contents of your sources.list and please clarify what your Operating system is. Thank you!
– kemotep
2 days ago
add a comment |
I do not think Ubuntu 10.04 repositories are going to be active at this point. Are you using Linux Mint or Ubuntu? Please edit your post with the contents of your sources.list and please clarify what your Operating system is. Thank you!
– kemotep
2 days ago
I do not think Ubuntu 10.04 repositories are going to be active at this point. Are you using Linux Mint or Ubuntu? Please edit your post with the contents of your sources.list and please clarify what your Operating system is. Thank you!
– kemotep
2 days ago
I do not think Ubuntu 10.04 repositories are going to be active at this point. Are you using Linux Mint or Ubuntu? Please edit your post with the contents of your sources.list and please clarify what your Operating system is. Thank you!
– kemotep
2 days ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
I am not using Ubuntu and so cannot test this, but reading the man pages for apt-secure(8) as suggested by the error message and going from there to sources.list(5), it appears that if you are desperate to stay on lucid you need to edit your sources.list to allow insecure downgrade.
From the man pages the syntax is probably
deb [ allow-downgrade-to-insecure=yes ] http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
BEWARE: this downgrading is clearly stated as a potential security risk.
The better option would be to upgrade your release. Apparently this can be done without a reinstall, even from obsolete releases to current and this is detailed in the Ubuntu Community..... but back-up first if you do.
One other thing you could try first is changing your mirror to the one in in the upgrade instructions and see if that one is still signed, I would assume it should be. This is on the Ubuntu Community link above and is probably as below
deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid main non-free
though a quick browse on the repository ftp didn't reveal a non-free element.
This solution appears otherwise to have worked for these good people
answered yesterday
bu5hmanbu5hman
1,323415
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Raffael is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509466%2frepository-not-signed-error-with-sourcelist%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
I am not using Ubuntu and so cannot test this, but reading the man pages for apt-secure(8) as suggested by the error message and going from there to sources.list(5), it appears that if you are desperate to stay on lucid you need to edit your sources.list to allow insecure downgrade.
From the man pages the syntax is probably
deb [ allow-downgrade-to-insecure=yes ] http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
BEWARE: this downgrading is clearly stated as a potential security risk.
The better option would be to upgrade your release. Apparently this can be done without a reinstall, even from obsolete releases to current and this is detailed in the Ubuntu Community..... but back-up first if you do.
One other thing you could try first is changing your mirror to the one in in the upgrade instructions and see if that one is still signed, I would assume it should be. This is on the Ubuntu Community link above and is probably as below
deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid main non-free
though a quick browse on the repository ftp didn't reveal a non-free element.
This solution appears otherwise to have worked for these good people
answered yesterday
bu5hmanbu5hman
1,323415
add a comment |
I am not using Ubuntu and so cannot test this, but reading the man pages for apt-secure(8) as suggested by the error message and going from there to sources.list(5), it appears that if you are desperate to stay on lucid you need to edit your sources.list to allow insecure downgrade.
From the man pages the syntax is probably
deb [ allow-downgrade-to-insecure=yes ] http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
BEWARE: this downgrading is clearly stated as a potential security risk.
The better option would be to upgrade your release. Apparently this can be done without a reinstall, even from obsolete releases to current and this is detailed in the Ubuntu Community..... but back-up first if you do.
One other thing you could try first is changing your mirror to the one in in the upgrade instructions and see if that one is still signed, I would assume it should be. This is on the Ubuntu Community link above and is probably as below
deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid main non-free
though a quick browse on the repository ftp didn't reveal a non-free element.
This solution appears otherwise to have worked for these good people
answered yesterday
bu5hmanbu5hman
1,323415
add a comment |
I am not using Ubuntu and so cannot test this, but reading the man pages for apt-secure(8) as suggested by the error message and going from there to sources.list(5), it appears that if you are desperate to stay on lucid you need to edit your sources.list to allow insecure downgrade.
From the man pages the syntax is probably
deb [ allow-downgrade-to-insecure=yes ] http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
BEWARE: this downgrading is clearly stated as a potential security risk.
The better option would be to upgrade your release. Apparently this can be done without a reinstall, even from obsolete releases to current and this is detailed in the Ubuntu Community..... but back-up first if you do.
One other thing you could try first is changing your mirror to the one in in the upgrade instructions and see if that one is still signed, I would assume it should be. This is on the Ubuntu Community link above and is probably as below
deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid main non-free
though a quick browse on the repository ftp didn't reveal a non-free element.
This solution appears otherwise to have worked for these good people
answered yesterday
bu5hmanbu5hman
1,323415
I am not using Ubuntu and so cannot test this, but reading the man pages for apt-secure(8) as suggested by the error message and going from there to sources.list(5), it appears that if you are desperate to stay on lucid you need to edit your sources.list to allow insecure downgrade.
From the man pages the syntax is probably
deb [ allow-downgrade-to-insecure=yes ] http://www.sourceslist.eu/repo/ubuntu lucid main non-free
BEWARE: this downgrading is clearly stated as a potential security risk.
The better option would be to upgrade your release. Apparently this can be done without a reinstall, even from obsolete releases to current and this is detailed in the Ubuntu Community..... but back-up first if you do.
One other thing you could try first is changing your mirror to the one in in the upgrade instructions and see if that one is still signed, I would assume it should be. This is on the Ubuntu Community link above and is probably as below
deb http://old-releases.ubuntu.com/ubuntu lucid main non-free
though a quick browse on the repository ftp didn't reveal a non-free element.
This solution appears otherwise to have worked for these good people
answered yesterday
bu5hmanbu5hman
1,323415
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
bu5hmanbu5hman
1,323415
answered yesterday
bu5hmanbu5hman
1,323415
answered yesterday
bu5hmanbu5hman
1,323415
1,323415
add a comment |
add a comment |
Raffael is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Raffael is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Raffael is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Raffael is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509466%2frepository-not-signed-error-with-sourcelist%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
I do not think Ubuntu 10.04 repositories are going to be active at this point. Are you using Linux Mint or Ubuntu? Please edit your post with the contents of your sources.list and please clarify what your Operating system is. Thank you!
– kemotep
2 days ago