Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy

What happens if I try to grapple an illusory duplicate from the Mirror Image spell?

Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

Why would five hundred and five be same as one?

Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Language involving irrational number is not a CFL

How much do grades matter for a future academia position?

Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

If Captain Marvel (MCU) were to have a child with a human male, would the child be human or Kree?

"Oh no!" in Latin

Overlapping circles covering polygon

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?

Does the Crossbow Expert feat's extra crossbow attack work with the reaction attack from a Hunter ranger's Giant Killer feature?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

Can I run 125kHz RF circuit on a breadboard?

Deciphering cause of death?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Ways of geometrical multiplication

Echo with obfuscation

Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?



Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?


(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy













6












$begingroup$


I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$


    I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



    Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



    For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



    Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



    So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



      Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



      For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



      Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



      So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



      Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



      For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



      Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



      So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.







      search-algorithms hash-tables permutations






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      SmileyCraftSmileyCraft

      1333




      1333




      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "419"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 12 hours ago

























          answered 23 hours ago









          Apass.JackApass.Jack

          13.1k1939




          13.1k1939











          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago

















          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
          $endgroup$
          – smac89
          22 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
          $endgroup$
          – smac89
          22 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          22 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          22 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          21 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          21 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
          $endgroup$
          – SmileyCraft
          12 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
          $endgroup$
          – SmileyCraft
          12 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          12 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          12 hours ago











          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

          NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

          대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495