Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy

What happens if I try to grapple an illusory duplicate from the Mirror Image spell?

Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment

Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?

Why would five hundred and five be same as one?

Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?

How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?

Language involving irrational number is not a CFL

How much do grades matter for a future academia position?

Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match

How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?

If Captain Marvel (MCU) were to have a child with a human male, would the child be human or Kree?

"Oh no!" in Latin

Overlapping circles covering polygon

Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?

Does the Crossbow Expert feat's extra crossbow attack work with the reaction attack from a Hunter ranger's Giant Killer feature?

Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup

Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?

Can I run 125kHz RF circuit on a breadboard?

Deciphering cause of death?

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Ways of geometrical multiplication

Echo with obfuscation

Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?

Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?



Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?


(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy













6












$begingroup$


I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










share|cite|improve this question







New contributor




SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$
















    6












    $begingroup$


    I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



    Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



    For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



    Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



    So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










    share|cite|improve this question







    New contributor




    SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.







    $endgroup$














      6












      6








      6





      $begingroup$


      I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



      Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



      For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



      Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



      So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.










      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.







      $endgroup$




      I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.



      Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.



      For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.



      Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.



      So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.







      search-algorithms hash-tables permutations






      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|cite|improve this question







      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question






      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked yesterday









      SmileyCraftSmileyCraft

      1333




      1333




      New contributor




      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      SmileyCraft is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago











          Your Answer





          StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
          return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
          StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
          StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
          );
          );
          , "mathjax-editing");

          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "419"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );






          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          3












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago
















          3












          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago














          3












          3








          3





          $begingroup$

          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$



          If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.



          This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
          take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.



          The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.



          Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.




          whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.




          A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.







          share|cite|improve this answer














          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer








          edited 12 hours ago

























          answered 23 hours ago









          Apass.JackApass.Jack

          13.1k1939




          13.1k1939











          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago

















          • $begingroup$
            I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
            $endgroup$
            – smac89
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            22 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            21 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
            $endgroup$
            – SmileyCraft
            12 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
            $endgroup$
            – Apass.Jack
            12 hours ago
















          $begingroup$
          I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
          $endgroup$
          – smac89
          22 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of a. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
          $endgroup$
          – smac89
          22 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          22 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          22 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          21 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          21 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
          $endgroup$
          – SmileyCraft
          12 hours ago




          $begingroup$
          Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
          $endgroup$
          – SmileyCraft
          12 hours ago












          $begingroup$
          Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          12 hours ago





          $begingroup$
          Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
          $endgroup$
          – Apass.Jack
          12 hours ago











          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











          SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














          Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

          Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition

          Marilyn Monroe Ny fiainany manokana | Jereo koa | Meny fitetezanafanitarana azy.