Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy
What happens if I try to grapple an illusory duplicate from the Mirror Image spell?
Unable to disable Microsoft Store in domain environment
Why didn’t Eve recognize the little cockroach as a living organism?
Why would five hundred and five be same as one?
Why the "ls" command is showing the permissions of files in a FAT32 partition?
How do you justify more code being written by following clean code practices?
Language involving irrational number is not a CFL
How much do grades matter for a future academia position?
Grepping string, but include all non-blank lines following each grep match
How do I fix the group tension caused by my character stealing and possibly killing without provocation?
If Captain Marvel (MCU) were to have a child with a human male, would the child be human or Kree?
"Oh no!" in Latin
Overlapping circles covering polygon
Why does a 97 / 92 key piano exist by Bösendorfer?
Does the Crossbow Expert feat's extra crossbow attack work with the reaction attack from a Hunter ranger's Giant Killer feature?
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
Why is the Sun approximated as a black body at ~ 5800 K?
Can I run 125kHz RF circuit on a breadboard?
Deciphering cause of death?
Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?
Ways of geometrical multiplication
Echo with obfuscation
Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?
Does Doodling or Improvising on the Piano Have Any Benefits?
Index matching algorithm without hash-based data structures?
(When) is hash table lookup O(1)?The theoretical upper bounds for duplicate detection in a set of objects?How are hash tables O(1) taking into account hashing speed?What Exactly Does the Term “Key” Mean with Regards to a Hash Table?Static hash tables“Hash” Probing?Algorithmic Design to Undo Rotation of ArrayDirect addressing on a huge arrayCan hash tables handle variable sized entries?Hash table open addressing without dummy
$begingroup$
I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.
Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.
For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.
Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.
So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
search-algorithms hash-tables permutations
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.
Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.
For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.
Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.
So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
search-algorithms hash-tables permutations
New contributor
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.
Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.
For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.
Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.
So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
search-algorithms hash-tables permutations
New contributor
$endgroup$
I am programming in C, so I do not want to implement a hash-based datastructure such as a hashset or hashmap/dictionary. However, I need to solve the following task in linear time.
Given two arrays $a$ and $b$ which contain the same set of distinct integers, determine for every element of $a$ the index of the same element in $b$.
For example, if $a=[9,4,3,7]$ and $b=[3,4,7,9]$, then the output should be $[3,1,0,2]$.
Note that this becomes a very easy task when you have a hashset, because you can simply store for every element in $b$ the index, and then query the hashmap for every element of $a$.
So my question is whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
search-algorithms hash-tables permutations
search-algorithms hash-tables permutations
New contributor
New contributor
New contributor
asked yesterday
SmileyCraftSmileyCraft
1333
1333
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.
This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.
The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.
Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.
whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements ofa
. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
$endgroup$
– smac89
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
12 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "419"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.
This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.
The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.
Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.
whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements ofa
. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
$endgroup$
– smac89
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
12 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.
This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.
The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.
Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.
whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements ofa
. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
$endgroup$
– smac89
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
12 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.
This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.
The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.
Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.
whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.
$endgroup$
If the only operation allowed between any two (possibly the same) elements in the two arrays is to determine which one is the smaller one, then it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ time in worst case for any algorithm.
This can be seen from the situation when array $a$ is sorted while array $b$ is arbitrary before we apply the algorithm. Knowing the index $I(k)$ of the element in $b$ which is the same as the $k$-th element of $a$ for all $k$, we can sort $b$ in $O(n)$ time by simply putting $b_I(k)$ in $k$-th position (using one temporary working space or a new result array of length $n$). However, it is well-known that it takes at least $Theta(nlog n)$ time (comparisons) to sort $b$ in worst cases for any algorithm. So obtaining that knowledge, the index $I(k)$ for all $k$ must
take at least $$Theta(nlog n)- O(n)=Theta(nlog n)$$ time as well in worst cases.
The following is a formal formulation of the conclusion above in the comparison computation model.
Let $mathcal O$ be an oracle that can tell a fixed strict linear ordering on $E$, a set of $n$ elements. That is, on input $e,fin E$, $mathcal O$ outputs -1 if $eprec f$, 0 if $e$ is $f$ and 1 otherwise. Let $a$ and $b$ are two bijections from $0, 1,cdots, n-1$ to $E$. To output $I(0), I(1), cdots, I(n-1)$ in that order such that $a(k)=b(I(k))$ for all $0le kle n-1$, it will take $Theta(nlog n)$ queries against $mathcal O$ in the worst case.
whether there is a linear algorithm for this task that does not use any hashsets.
A computation model that is defined by no usage of hashset is not a well-defined computation mode. How can you check there is no usage of hashset? There are literally hundreds of ways to implement a data structure that is a hashset or looks like a hashset or looks like a hashset partially. In general, a well-defined computation model must be defined by what can be done formally.
edited 12 hours ago
answered 23 hours ago
Apass.JackApass.Jack
13.1k1939
13.1k1939
$begingroup$
I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements ofa
. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
$endgroup$
– smac89
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
12 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
$begingroup$
I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements ofa
. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).
$endgroup$
– smac89
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of
a
. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).$endgroup$
– smac89
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the elements of
a
. It sounds more like he is asking for a mapping i.e. map element of a to it's position in b; not order elements of a according to their position in b. Ordering will require O(nlogn) as you have astutely observed, but mapping can be done in O(n).$endgroup$
– smac89
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
Exactly, I don't think OP is asking for an ordering of the element of $a$. Please read my answer carefully, especially the formal formulation. Please come to chat.stackexchange.com/rooms/2710/computer-science for a chat.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
22 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
This answer abstracts "distinct integers" as "distinct elements" with a strict total order. There could be other computation models for "distinct integers" without "hashset".
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
21 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Very interesting answer! Thank you! One question, though: You claim such a linear algorithm allows linear sorting. If I understand your argument correctly it goes like this. You can simply set $a$ to be $E$ in order, and set $b$ to be the unsorted list. However I do not see how you would calculate the array $a$ from the input, because $E$ is not known in advance.
$endgroup$
– SmileyCraft
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
12 hours ago
$begingroup$
Array $a$ is postulated to be $E$ in order. Array $b$ is postulated to be arbitrary. (Or you can image that before we apply the algorithm, we have used the oracle to order $a$. We leave $b$ alone). Then let us see what it implies when we apply the linear algorithm.
$endgroup$
– Apass.Jack
12 hours ago
|
show 1 more comment
SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
SmileyCraft is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Computer Science Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fcs.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f105808%2findex-matching-algorithm-without-hash-based-data-structures%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown