Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audienceLecturing (teaching methods) for a diverse group of students with weak science backgroundsKeeping your throat comfortable after hours of lecturinglecturing one subject with other lecturer's materialHow to overcome my resistance to lecturing?What strategy should I follow for lecturing a course in which I have only a basic background?What are the health impacts of standing / sitting while lecturing?I am uncomfortable about students taking pictures of the blackboard, because I don't like appearing in themHow to write horizontally across the blackboard while keeping handwriting as horizontal as possible?How to represent a tensor/matrix/vector/array in blackboard?How's my lecturing?
How do I tell my boss that I'm quitting in 15 days (a colleague left this week)
In One Punch Man, is King actually weak?
Is there a RAID 0 Equivalent for RAM?
What is the smallest number n> 5 so that 5 ^ n ends with "3125"?
ContourPlot — How do I color by contour curvature?
What should be the ideal length of sentences in a blog post for ease of reading?
Anime with legendary swords made from talismans and a man who could change them with a shattered body
Storage of electrolytic capacitors - how long?
Language involving irrational number is not a CFL
How do I prevent inappropriate ads from appearing in my game?
How to test the sharpness of a knife?
Animation: customize bounce interpolation
Did I make a mistake by ccing email to boss to others?
Echo with obfuscation
Proving an identity involving cross products and coplanar vectors
How to get directions in deep space?
Check if object is null and return null
Why do Radio Buttons not fill the entire outer circle?
Make a Bowl of Alphabet Soup
Ways of geometrical multiplication
Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?
Should I assume I have passed probation?
Given this phrasing in the lease, when should I pay my rent?
Is there a way to play vibrato on the piano?
Mimic lecturing on blackboard, facing audience
Lecturing (teaching methods) for a diverse group of students with weak science backgroundsKeeping your throat comfortable after hours of lecturinglecturing one subject with other lecturer's materialHow to overcome my resistance to lecturing?What strategy should I follow for lecturing a course in which I have only a basic background?What are the health impacts of standing / sitting while lecturing?I am uncomfortable about students taking pictures of the blackboard, because I don't like appearing in themHow to write horizontally across the blackboard while keeping handwriting as horizontal as possible?How to represent a tensor/matrix/vector/array in blackboard?How's my lecturing?
I teach mathematics at MSc and PhD levels. My preferred method of teaching is old-fashioned: talking and writing on the blackboard at the same time.
Why? Because it has many advantages:
Handwriting: imposes few restrictions on notation and illustration. (Complicated figures I could project from my laptop, but I have no need for this in my courses.)
Flexibility: whenever this is useful, it is easy to 'deviate from the script'.
Natural speed: it imposes a natural speed on the speaker. Preparing slides using LaTeX or PowerPoint and just clicking through them, I find myself proceeding way too fast.
Parallel displays: having several boards available for writing makes it easy to keep some text/examples on display on one board, while writing on another.
Dynamics: referring to information on the different boards allows me to move through the room, adding a more dynamic aspect to the lecture.
Ease: it is a low-tech way of achieving all these things simultaneously with easily available means.
The main disadvantage of this method is that I spend a significant amount of time of each lecture with my back to the audience.
Question: What would you recommend as a means of communication that combines the six features above (most importantly, the handwriting and parallel displays), but facing the audience?
Obviously, a low-budget solution would be appreciated, but my institute is usually pretty generous in investing in technology that improves teaching, so don't let that restrict you!
What I tried: Many things, including writing by hand on tablets (iPads, Digital Paper, reMarkable, etc.) and projecting this in the classroom. Perhaps I haven't found the optimal device for this yet, but it often comes out pixellated, delayed, and less readable than my usual handwriting on paper or the blackboard. Using a document camera to project my handwriting on paper works well, but can project only about half an A4 paper at a time to keep it readable for people in the back of the room and, like other approaches, has the disadvantage of not having parallel displays: it's hugely important to be able to keep definitions, examples, theorems from earlier on for easy reference.
teaching lecture-teaching-method technology
New contributor
add a comment |
I teach mathematics at MSc and PhD levels. My preferred method of teaching is old-fashioned: talking and writing on the blackboard at the same time.
Why? Because it has many advantages:
Handwriting: imposes few restrictions on notation and illustration. (Complicated figures I could project from my laptop, but I have no need for this in my courses.)
Flexibility: whenever this is useful, it is easy to 'deviate from the script'.
Natural speed: it imposes a natural speed on the speaker. Preparing slides using LaTeX or PowerPoint and just clicking through them, I find myself proceeding way too fast.
Parallel displays: having several boards available for writing makes it easy to keep some text/examples on display on one board, while writing on another.
Dynamics: referring to information on the different boards allows me to move through the room, adding a more dynamic aspect to the lecture.
Ease: it is a low-tech way of achieving all these things simultaneously with easily available means.
The main disadvantage of this method is that I spend a significant amount of time of each lecture with my back to the audience.
Question: What would you recommend as a means of communication that combines the six features above (most importantly, the handwriting and parallel displays), but facing the audience?
Obviously, a low-budget solution would be appreciated, but my institute is usually pretty generous in investing in technology that improves teaching, so don't let that restrict you!
What I tried: Many things, including writing by hand on tablets (iPads, Digital Paper, reMarkable, etc.) and projecting this in the classroom. Perhaps I haven't found the optimal device for this yet, but it often comes out pixellated, delayed, and less readable than my usual handwriting on paper or the blackboard. Using a document camera to project my handwriting on paper works well, but can project only about half an A4 paper at a time to keep it readable for people in the back of the room and, like other approaches, has the disadvantage of not having parallel displays: it's hugely important to be able to keep definitions, examples, theorems from earlier on for easy reference.
teaching lecture-teaching-method technology
New contributor
1
Also posted at Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange.
– Joel Reyes Noche
19 hours ago
1
This thread should be thought-provoking, matheducators.stackexchange.com/a/731/689
– Alecos Papadopoulos
8 hours ago
Gadgets are not necessarily an improvement, vide the succession: Blackboard -> Overhead Projector -> Power Point
-- EWD1305
– Tobia Tesan
6 hours ago
1
What prevents you from simply doing both? have a set of slides prepared and do them, and if you feel the need, use the blackboard. This allows you to react on questions from the audience quite dynamically, while reaping in all benefits of using slides. And if you notice that what you have on the blackboard is essential, just include it in the slides for the next time you give the same course. This allows iterating on and improving the slides as well.
– Polygnome
3 hours ago
In my experience, the main disadvantage of this method is that my institution believes it is old-fashioned and therefore, without argument, automatically bad. As such they refuse to support it by maintaining blackboards properly, etc. Not my problem - not my students' problem - purely the institution's problem. <end rant>
– David
1 hour ago
add a comment |
I teach mathematics at MSc and PhD levels. My preferred method of teaching is old-fashioned: talking and writing on the blackboard at the same time.
Why? Because it has many advantages:
Handwriting: imposes few restrictions on notation and illustration. (Complicated figures I could project from my laptop, but I have no need for this in my courses.)
Flexibility: whenever this is useful, it is easy to 'deviate from the script'.
Natural speed: it imposes a natural speed on the speaker. Preparing slides using LaTeX or PowerPoint and just clicking through them, I find myself proceeding way too fast.
Parallel displays: having several boards available for writing makes it easy to keep some text/examples on display on one board, while writing on another.
Dynamics: referring to information on the different boards allows me to move through the room, adding a more dynamic aspect to the lecture.
Ease: it is a low-tech way of achieving all these things simultaneously with easily available means.
The main disadvantage of this method is that I spend a significant amount of time of each lecture with my back to the audience.
Question: What would you recommend as a means of communication that combines the six features above (most importantly, the handwriting and parallel displays), but facing the audience?
Obviously, a low-budget solution would be appreciated, but my institute is usually pretty generous in investing in technology that improves teaching, so don't let that restrict you!
What I tried: Many things, including writing by hand on tablets (iPads, Digital Paper, reMarkable, etc.) and projecting this in the classroom. Perhaps I haven't found the optimal device for this yet, but it often comes out pixellated, delayed, and less readable than my usual handwriting on paper or the blackboard. Using a document camera to project my handwriting on paper works well, but can project only about half an A4 paper at a time to keep it readable for people in the back of the room and, like other approaches, has the disadvantage of not having parallel displays: it's hugely important to be able to keep definitions, examples, theorems from earlier on for easy reference.
teaching lecture-teaching-method technology
New contributor
I teach mathematics at MSc and PhD levels. My preferred method of teaching is old-fashioned: talking and writing on the blackboard at the same time.
Why? Because it has many advantages:
Handwriting: imposes few restrictions on notation and illustration. (Complicated figures I could project from my laptop, but I have no need for this in my courses.)
Flexibility: whenever this is useful, it is easy to 'deviate from the script'.
Natural speed: it imposes a natural speed on the speaker. Preparing slides using LaTeX or PowerPoint and just clicking through them, I find myself proceeding way too fast.
Parallel displays: having several boards available for writing makes it easy to keep some text/examples on display on one board, while writing on another.
Dynamics: referring to information on the different boards allows me to move through the room, adding a more dynamic aspect to the lecture.
Ease: it is a low-tech way of achieving all these things simultaneously with easily available means.
The main disadvantage of this method is that I spend a significant amount of time of each lecture with my back to the audience.
Question: What would you recommend as a means of communication that combines the six features above (most importantly, the handwriting and parallel displays), but facing the audience?
Obviously, a low-budget solution would be appreciated, but my institute is usually pretty generous in investing in technology that improves teaching, so don't let that restrict you!
What I tried: Many things, including writing by hand on tablets (iPads, Digital Paper, reMarkable, etc.) and projecting this in the classroom. Perhaps I haven't found the optimal device for this yet, but it often comes out pixellated, delayed, and less readable than my usual handwriting on paper or the blackboard. Using a document camera to project my handwriting on paper works well, but can project only about half an A4 paper at a time to keep it readable for people in the back of the room and, like other approaches, has the disadvantage of not having parallel displays: it's hugely important to be able to keep definitions, examples, theorems from earlier on for easy reference.
teaching lecture-teaching-method technology
teaching lecture-teaching-method technology
New contributor
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
Cody Gray
1435
1435
New contributor
asked 21 hours ago
MarkMark
16125
16125
New contributor
New contributor
1
Also posted at Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange.
– Joel Reyes Noche
19 hours ago
1
This thread should be thought-provoking, matheducators.stackexchange.com/a/731/689
– Alecos Papadopoulos
8 hours ago
Gadgets are not necessarily an improvement, vide the succession: Blackboard -> Overhead Projector -> Power Point
-- EWD1305
– Tobia Tesan
6 hours ago
1
What prevents you from simply doing both? have a set of slides prepared and do them, and if you feel the need, use the blackboard. This allows you to react on questions from the audience quite dynamically, while reaping in all benefits of using slides. And if you notice that what you have on the blackboard is essential, just include it in the slides for the next time you give the same course. This allows iterating on and improving the slides as well.
– Polygnome
3 hours ago
In my experience, the main disadvantage of this method is that my institution believes it is old-fashioned and therefore, without argument, automatically bad. As such they refuse to support it by maintaining blackboards properly, etc. Not my problem - not my students' problem - purely the institution's problem. <end rant>
– David
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
Also posted at Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange.
– Joel Reyes Noche
19 hours ago
1
This thread should be thought-provoking, matheducators.stackexchange.com/a/731/689
– Alecos Papadopoulos
8 hours ago
Gadgets are not necessarily an improvement, vide the succession: Blackboard -> Overhead Projector -> Power Point
-- EWD1305
– Tobia Tesan
6 hours ago
1
What prevents you from simply doing both? have a set of slides prepared and do them, and if you feel the need, use the blackboard. This allows you to react on questions from the audience quite dynamically, while reaping in all benefits of using slides. And if you notice that what you have on the blackboard is essential, just include it in the slides for the next time you give the same course. This allows iterating on and improving the slides as well.
– Polygnome
3 hours ago
In my experience, the main disadvantage of this method is that my institution believes it is old-fashioned and therefore, without argument, automatically bad. As such they refuse to support it by maintaining blackboards properly, etc. Not my problem - not my students' problem - purely the institution's problem. <end rant>
– David
1 hour ago
1
1
Also posted at Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange.
– Joel Reyes Noche
19 hours ago
Also posted at Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange.
– Joel Reyes Noche
19 hours ago
1
1
This thread should be thought-provoking, matheducators.stackexchange.com/a/731/689
– Alecos Papadopoulos
8 hours ago
This thread should be thought-provoking, matheducators.stackexchange.com/a/731/689
– Alecos Papadopoulos
8 hours ago
Gadgets are not necessarily an improvement, vide the succession: Blackboard -> Overhead Projector -> Power Point
-- EWD1305– Tobia Tesan
6 hours ago
Gadgets are not necessarily an improvement, vide the succession: Blackboard -> Overhead Projector -> Power Point
-- EWD1305– Tobia Tesan
6 hours ago
1
1
What prevents you from simply doing both? have a set of slides prepared and do them, and if you feel the need, use the blackboard. This allows you to react on questions from the audience quite dynamically, while reaping in all benefits of using slides. And if you notice that what you have on the blackboard is essential, just include it in the slides for the next time you give the same course. This allows iterating on and improving the slides as well.
– Polygnome
3 hours ago
What prevents you from simply doing both? have a set of slides prepared and do them, and if you feel the need, use the blackboard. This allows you to react on questions from the audience quite dynamically, while reaping in all benefits of using slides. And if you notice that what you have on the blackboard is essential, just include it in the slides for the next time you give the same course. This allows iterating on and improving the slides as well.
– Polygnome
3 hours ago
In my experience, the main disadvantage of this method is that my institution believes it is old-fashioned and therefore, without argument, automatically bad. As such they refuse to support it by maintaining blackboards properly, etc. Not my problem - not my students' problem - purely the institution's problem. <end rant>
– David
1 hour ago
In my experience, the main disadvantage of this method is that my institution believes it is old-fashioned and therefore, without argument, automatically bad. As such they refuse to support it by maintaining blackboards properly, etc. Not my problem - not my students' problem - purely the institution's problem. <end rant>
– David
1 hour ago
add a comment |
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
Do not assume that facing the audience is actually better. It depends on the type of content. For example, if you are explaining a diagram (detailed hydraulic system for instance), you want the audience to concentrate on that, not the presenter. The audience is still getting plenty of stimulation by having a live human voice along with visual content. You actually don't want the presenter to distract the eyeballs from the intricate content. (I see this wrong often with recorded talks where the video operator concentrates on the podium versus the charts, or shows both but with inadequate scale to see the slide charts.) If you are doing math (as opposed to history or literature), the content is more intricate and you should have the audience concentrating on the formulas, not the speaker.
Take some occasional time to address the class when that is appropriate. Examples are a "sea story" about test performance or industrial application of the math. But these will be a minor amount of time within a math lecture.
I mean, if you really wanted to, you could write backwards in grease pencil on plexiglass like in an old Navy combat information center. But really what is the point. People concentrate on the status (content), not the writer anyways. The one advantage is that you don't have a body blocking part of the board. I believe there are now electronic versions that would flip this around for you (or you can use an OHP). But still I think you lose a lot from having a lot less screen space than board space (especially with sliding boards). So, the small advantage of facing is at the loss of huge amounts of content physical space.
New contributor
2
I agree to the extent that I don't want the audience to focus on me instead of what I write. My aim is rather that I want more focus on the audience to check for questions and/or whether too many of them are nodding off or generally going on mental-screen-saver...
– Mark
20 hours ago
4
@Mark Turn around occasionally to check on the audience. I completely agree with the present response. I really dislike writing (or seeing somebody write) on a small pad/paper when it is projected. It is strongly confined and looks like Spock looking into his visor device. When on the blackboard, you make large arm movements, so the whole body movement that produces the writing is obvious to the audience - do not underestimate the effect that it makes, it's far more natural.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
Great point. I guess, you could (1) turn occasionally to check fr raised hands or ask for understanding (or oral questioning to test comprehension) or (2) encourage interruption. I would only do (2) in the context of a rather intimate class size. Obviously 1 is not full time, but I think occasional is fine. It's probably hard to both explain complicated math and check comprehension in parallel anyways. And a serial process is a nice break of the flow anyways.
– guest
20 hours ago
1
w.r.t. point 1: that's fine if you've got a tie-clip mic, but facing the board can make you hard to hear if there's a lectern mic or none at all. Obviously this depends on the size and acoustics of the room as well as your voice, but it doesn't have to be a big room.
– Chris H
18 hours ago
1
@PyRulez My son has toy "spy glasses" with small mirrors at the sides that allow you to look behind you. I guess I'll confiscate them for educational use now.
– Mark
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The retro-projectors where one wrote on the plastic film allowed one to go "back in time" as it were... rewind...
Of course one could lay a diagram on top then remove it etc
So, you can have a single slide with a particular expression or theorem that you need often and drop it on as necessary.
One comment mentions a "camera" to project a document - one that was used to do this is called an epidiascope...
14
Horrible! I remember a prof using such scrolling projectors, and he kept scrolling around, especially back, to remind audience of previous stuff - impossible to follow, makes you lose thread, you force yourself to read/take notes as fast as you can before the next scrolling takes place; after scrolling back to current stage, you have to constantly search again for location you are reading. Do not use! Stick with the good old blackboard where text does not move all the time! Your back to the audience is a very minor nuisance compared to scrollable plastic film.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
3
There is a modern version of this, where you simply write on paper and a camera transfers this to the projector. This way you can show past notes without moving everything else, but the available writing space is still nowhere near a proper set of 6 or 9 boards, even if you have two of them. I know some people who actually prefer them to blackboards, since you can also prepare some sheets beforehand and don't have to budget time for cleaning if the boards are full.
– mlk
19 hours ago
1
Also another note, those retro-projectors are a problem for left-handed people as the students will only see the writing hand instead of the last written line.
– mlk
19 hours ago
3
@CaptainEmacs so the prof used it badly... There are profs who use blackboards badly, or slides badly...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
1
These projectors were used at ETH Zürich back in the 90s. It wasn't so bad, but I never managed to not stick on the plastic scroll with my sweaty hands, making horrific messes. I remember Marvin Minsky giving a guest lecture using one, resulting in an incomprehensible scroll of modern art. It got snarfed by some students for publication. They are really best if you have your slides prepared beforehand or if you write really slowly and deliberately.
– David Tonhofer
18 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
There is an extremely simple solution to this, which is that you stand sideways, with the students on your left and the board on the right. When you turn your head to the left, you're looking at your students. When you write, your body isn't blocking the board, or is at most only temporarily and partially blocking it. When you pause to explain something or ask for questions, you can turn your whole body toward the class and step a little to the side so that everyone has a clear view.
It's not particularly difficult to write in the sideways stance, and it doesn't even really take any practice. When I call students to the board to present their work, I just briefly demonstrate it to them, and they generally can do it immediately.
add a comment |
This answer is going to broaden the question asked to instead be, "How can I give the students a better experience, while still delivering content through speaking and hand-writing?"
I would suggest spending dramatically less time lecturing in class. Instead, record the (majority of your) lectures electronically, and share them with your students online. You can use whatever setup you like -- writing on the board(s), writing on paper, writing on a tablet, writing on glass and having the image left-right reversed -- with one or more cameras recording your lectures. You can edit the footage as you like, to allow the parallel displays you enjoy for example.
This has several important benefits:
- Students can view your lectures at their own pace, at their own convenience, with the ability to pause, rewind, replay, and fast-forward.
- You can use class-time more effectively, by taking advantage of the circumstance of all these people in the same room. Have them talk to each other! They can work on exercises, or go through details of proofs, or work on more ambitious projects. Small groups are most effective, size 3 or 4.
Both of the above benefits are much more important than the ability to see your face during lectures.
That sounds great, but what if there are 200+ students, as was the case in my undergraduate lectures.
– JeremyC
5 hours ago
1. OP asks about graduate courses. 2. Even with 200+ students, some of the classtime can be spent in active learning.
– vadim123
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The document camera is, in my experience, the best approach by far.
It has a couple of unique advantages, including producing permanent copies of the lecture notes, both for your benefit when preparing exams and (possibly) for the students' benefit (if you decide to make these notes available, whether to everyone or only in special circumstances). Another advantage is that it's more natural to use than a vertically-mounted chalk- or dry erase-board, so your handwriting comes out more much readable and requires less effort. Finally, it is more accessible to students sitting in the back of the room, where blackboards are generally unreadable due to size, shadows, etc.
The only significant drawback is the need for specialized equipment. But if your institution is able to provide that, you should take advantage of it.
The limited display capability is not a real drawback. It is quite rare that you need to project more than half or two-thirds of a sheet of paper at a time. It simply isn't feasible to talk about that many different things at once. If nothing else, it forces you to keep in mind the audience's human limitations. If you really need to give a "big picture" view, you can always zoom out on the document camera.
While it isn't strictly necessary to make eye contact with your audience, especially since many students will be looking down to take notes anyway, don't underestimate the advantage of being able to actually connect with your students in appropriate contexts. If you are looking out at the class, it's much easier to judge understanding, see those with questions, and just make yourself seem friendly and approachable.
Document cameras allow you to face forward and give a natural lecture, while maintaining all of the advantages of a "chalk talk".
New contributor
2
Giving an up vote as I think doc cams are the way to go for many things. But in mathematics it is actually quite necessary often-times to allow for people to see as much as three boards' worth of material at a time; I had to today in my linear algebra course.
– kcrisman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
If the space in which you lecture permits, you could simply put some big mirrors next to or between your blackboards. That would let you continue to write with your back to the audience as you do now while also being able to casually glance at them (or at least some of them) without turning around.
Less unusually, if you're in a small classroom setting you could angle your blackboard a bit away from the class. I've seen plenty of rooms that had a portable blackboard positioned like this before, and it allows the teacher to stand to one side of the blackboard and glance sideways at the class while writing. (I suspect that this is not what usually motivates such setups, and that they're typically done due to a lack of space for the extra blackboard at the front of the room, but there's no reason you can't deliberately use this approach for the visibility benefit.) Of course, in the context of a big lecture hall this would be annoying to the class.
New contributor
add a comment |
I don't have a lot to add to these contributors in terms of nitty-gritty details, but I think that if you can get it having a good setup with both document camera AND chalkboard is best. (Or possibly multiple doc cams.) At least, that is my experience with mathematics in a number of different settings.
When I am in a room that allows for it, I will have certain definitions just continuously on the board, and then dynamic examples (whether computer-generated or paper) on the camera screen. Or you can use the chalkboard for stuff that has to stay up a long time, for which you know people will be copying down anyway - and then you can stand aside as they (hopefully) internalize.
Or, if you have time ahead of time, put needed definitions on some side boards (we have side whiteboards in some classrooms) that you can point to, while keeping attention up front. In any case, you can think dynamic versus static content for the two 'devices' (if a chalkboard is a device).
It does depend upon the type of course. Honestly, for graduate coursework you'll probably be flying so fast it won't matter what technique you use. Given the setup of many rooms in many universities in many countries (but not all of any of the above, of course), I would recommend the doc cam + chalkboard combination as an easily attainable via media that gets at most of what you want in a lecture-based course.
(Whether you want to do a lecture-based course is a different question, but I won't wade into that here.)
add a comment |
I had such a math teacher in college. He would walk in, start writing on the board, and not stop until the end of class, then walk out. It was horrible. Everyone in the class hated it. A few complaints later, and he started turning around periodically to see if there were questions, and if the class was keeping up.
Spending a significant amount of your time with your back to the audience isn't a problem, as long as it's not all of the time. Just check in with the students, and make sure that they know it's ok to interrupt you when your back is turned (assuming you're ok with that).
New contributor
add a comment |
I think one possible solution could be the use of a camera-projector system also often known as a document camera. A common example I've seen in universities around Canada is ELMO your university may consider investing in these and placing them in classrooms around campus.
This system also allows for you to switch to any detailed diagrams or animations you may want to present to your class through your laptop hooked up to the same projector.
New contributor
add a comment |
In my opinion complex concepts which involve a lot of mathematical equations are best taught by interacting with the audience and allowing students to write along with the instructor. Many people have suggested here the use of a document camera. How about a transparent-board camera?
I like what Rob Edwards from SDSU uses for his courses on YouTube. For example check out this one. Here is a screenshot:
He uses dark clothing, dark background and a transparent board to write on facing the audience. A camera captures the board content from the front and then inverts the video to project on a display, so that it is in the correct readable orientation.
New contributor
add a comment |
You could write up the main points one butcher paper, then roll them up and put them on the walls. Then you can write out the detailed steps and project them onto the board, then as you finish a section, unroll the summary. This will also provide a stopping point for people to ask questions.
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "415"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126740%2fmimic-lecturing-on-blackboard-facing-audience%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
11 Answers
11
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Do not assume that facing the audience is actually better. It depends on the type of content. For example, if you are explaining a diagram (detailed hydraulic system for instance), you want the audience to concentrate on that, not the presenter. The audience is still getting plenty of stimulation by having a live human voice along with visual content. You actually don't want the presenter to distract the eyeballs from the intricate content. (I see this wrong often with recorded talks where the video operator concentrates on the podium versus the charts, or shows both but with inadequate scale to see the slide charts.) If you are doing math (as opposed to history or literature), the content is more intricate and you should have the audience concentrating on the formulas, not the speaker.
Take some occasional time to address the class when that is appropriate. Examples are a "sea story" about test performance or industrial application of the math. But these will be a minor amount of time within a math lecture.
I mean, if you really wanted to, you could write backwards in grease pencil on plexiglass like in an old Navy combat information center. But really what is the point. People concentrate on the status (content), not the writer anyways. The one advantage is that you don't have a body blocking part of the board. I believe there are now electronic versions that would flip this around for you (or you can use an OHP). But still I think you lose a lot from having a lot less screen space than board space (especially with sliding boards). So, the small advantage of facing is at the loss of huge amounts of content physical space.
New contributor
2
I agree to the extent that I don't want the audience to focus on me instead of what I write. My aim is rather that I want more focus on the audience to check for questions and/or whether too many of them are nodding off or generally going on mental-screen-saver...
– Mark
20 hours ago
4
@Mark Turn around occasionally to check on the audience. I completely agree with the present response. I really dislike writing (or seeing somebody write) on a small pad/paper when it is projected. It is strongly confined and looks like Spock looking into his visor device. When on the blackboard, you make large arm movements, so the whole body movement that produces the writing is obvious to the audience - do not underestimate the effect that it makes, it's far more natural.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
Great point. I guess, you could (1) turn occasionally to check fr raised hands or ask for understanding (or oral questioning to test comprehension) or (2) encourage interruption. I would only do (2) in the context of a rather intimate class size. Obviously 1 is not full time, but I think occasional is fine. It's probably hard to both explain complicated math and check comprehension in parallel anyways. And a serial process is a nice break of the flow anyways.
– guest
20 hours ago
1
w.r.t. point 1: that's fine if you've got a tie-clip mic, but facing the board can make you hard to hear if there's a lectern mic or none at all. Obviously this depends on the size and acoustics of the room as well as your voice, but it doesn't have to be a big room.
– Chris H
18 hours ago
1
@PyRulez My son has toy "spy glasses" with small mirrors at the sides that allow you to look behind you. I guess I'll confiscate them for educational use now.
– Mark
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Do not assume that facing the audience is actually better. It depends on the type of content. For example, if you are explaining a diagram (detailed hydraulic system for instance), you want the audience to concentrate on that, not the presenter. The audience is still getting plenty of stimulation by having a live human voice along with visual content. You actually don't want the presenter to distract the eyeballs from the intricate content. (I see this wrong often with recorded talks where the video operator concentrates on the podium versus the charts, or shows both but with inadequate scale to see the slide charts.) If you are doing math (as opposed to history or literature), the content is more intricate and you should have the audience concentrating on the formulas, not the speaker.
Take some occasional time to address the class when that is appropriate. Examples are a "sea story" about test performance or industrial application of the math. But these will be a minor amount of time within a math lecture.
I mean, if you really wanted to, you could write backwards in grease pencil on plexiglass like in an old Navy combat information center. But really what is the point. People concentrate on the status (content), not the writer anyways. The one advantage is that you don't have a body blocking part of the board. I believe there are now electronic versions that would flip this around for you (or you can use an OHP). But still I think you lose a lot from having a lot less screen space than board space (especially with sliding boards). So, the small advantage of facing is at the loss of huge amounts of content physical space.
New contributor
2
I agree to the extent that I don't want the audience to focus on me instead of what I write. My aim is rather that I want more focus on the audience to check for questions and/or whether too many of them are nodding off or generally going on mental-screen-saver...
– Mark
20 hours ago
4
@Mark Turn around occasionally to check on the audience. I completely agree with the present response. I really dislike writing (or seeing somebody write) on a small pad/paper when it is projected. It is strongly confined and looks like Spock looking into his visor device. When on the blackboard, you make large arm movements, so the whole body movement that produces the writing is obvious to the audience - do not underestimate the effect that it makes, it's far more natural.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
Great point. I guess, you could (1) turn occasionally to check fr raised hands or ask for understanding (or oral questioning to test comprehension) or (2) encourage interruption. I would only do (2) in the context of a rather intimate class size. Obviously 1 is not full time, but I think occasional is fine. It's probably hard to both explain complicated math and check comprehension in parallel anyways. And a serial process is a nice break of the flow anyways.
– guest
20 hours ago
1
w.r.t. point 1: that's fine if you've got a tie-clip mic, but facing the board can make you hard to hear if there's a lectern mic or none at all. Obviously this depends on the size and acoustics of the room as well as your voice, but it doesn't have to be a big room.
– Chris H
18 hours ago
1
@PyRulez My son has toy "spy glasses" with small mirrors at the sides that allow you to look behind you. I guess I'll confiscate them for educational use now.
– Mark
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
Do not assume that facing the audience is actually better. It depends on the type of content. For example, if you are explaining a diagram (detailed hydraulic system for instance), you want the audience to concentrate on that, not the presenter. The audience is still getting plenty of stimulation by having a live human voice along with visual content. You actually don't want the presenter to distract the eyeballs from the intricate content. (I see this wrong often with recorded talks where the video operator concentrates on the podium versus the charts, or shows both but with inadequate scale to see the slide charts.) If you are doing math (as opposed to history or literature), the content is more intricate and you should have the audience concentrating on the formulas, not the speaker.
Take some occasional time to address the class when that is appropriate. Examples are a "sea story" about test performance or industrial application of the math. But these will be a minor amount of time within a math lecture.
I mean, if you really wanted to, you could write backwards in grease pencil on plexiglass like in an old Navy combat information center. But really what is the point. People concentrate on the status (content), not the writer anyways. The one advantage is that you don't have a body blocking part of the board. I believe there are now electronic versions that would flip this around for you (or you can use an OHP). But still I think you lose a lot from having a lot less screen space than board space (especially with sliding boards). So, the small advantage of facing is at the loss of huge amounts of content physical space.
New contributor
Do not assume that facing the audience is actually better. It depends on the type of content. For example, if you are explaining a diagram (detailed hydraulic system for instance), you want the audience to concentrate on that, not the presenter. The audience is still getting plenty of stimulation by having a live human voice along with visual content. You actually don't want the presenter to distract the eyeballs from the intricate content. (I see this wrong often with recorded talks where the video operator concentrates on the podium versus the charts, or shows both but with inadequate scale to see the slide charts.) If you are doing math (as opposed to history or literature), the content is more intricate and you should have the audience concentrating on the formulas, not the speaker.
Take some occasional time to address the class when that is appropriate. Examples are a "sea story" about test performance or industrial application of the math. But these will be a minor amount of time within a math lecture.
I mean, if you really wanted to, you could write backwards in grease pencil on plexiglass like in an old Navy combat information center. But really what is the point. People concentrate on the status (content), not the writer anyways. The one advantage is that you don't have a body blocking part of the board. I believe there are now electronic versions that would flip this around for you (or you can use an OHP). But still I think you lose a lot from having a lot less screen space than board space (especially with sliding boards). So, the small advantage of facing is at the loss of huge amounts of content physical space.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 20 hours ago
guestguest
21113
21113
New contributor
New contributor
2
I agree to the extent that I don't want the audience to focus on me instead of what I write. My aim is rather that I want more focus on the audience to check for questions and/or whether too many of them are nodding off or generally going on mental-screen-saver...
– Mark
20 hours ago
4
@Mark Turn around occasionally to check on the audience. I completely agree with the present response. I really dislike writing (or seeing somebody write) on a small pad/paper when it is projected. It is strongly confined and looks like Spock looking into his visor device. When on the blackboard, you make large arm movements, so the whole body movement that produces the writing is obvious to the audience - do not underestimate the effect that it makes, it's far more natural.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
Great point. I guess, you could (1) turn occasionally to check fr raised hands or ask for understanding (or oral questioning to test comprehension) or (2) encourage interruption. I would only do (2) in the context of a rather intimate class size. Obviously 1 is not full time, but I think occasional is fine. It's probably hard to both explain complicated math and check comprehension in parallel anyways. And a serial process is a nice break of the flow anyways.
– guest
20 hours ago
1
w.r.t. point 1: that's fine if you've got a tie-clip mic, but facing the board can make you hard to hear if there's a lectern mic or none at all. Obviously this depends on the size and acoustics of the room as well as your voice, but it doesn't have to be a big room.
– Chris H
18 hours ago
1
@PyRulez My son has toy "spy glasses" with small mirrors at the sides that allow you to look behind you. I guess I'll confiscate them for educational use now.
– Mark
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
2
I agree to the extent that I don't want the audience to focus on me instead of what I write. My aim is rather that I want more focus on the audience to check for questions and/or whether too many of them are nodding off or generally going on mental-screen-saver...
– Mark
20 hours ago
4
@Mark Turn around occasionally to check on the audience. I completely agree with the present response. I really dislike writing (or seeing somebody write) on a small pad/paper when it is projected. It is strongly confined and looks like Spock looking into his visor device. When on the blackboard, you make large arm movements, so the whole body movement that produces the writing is obvious to the audience - do not underestimate the effect that it makes, it's far more natural.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
Great point. I guess, you could (1) turn occasionally to check fr raised hands or ask for understanding (or oral questioning to test comprehension) or (2) encourage interruption. I would only do (2) in the context of a rather intimate class size. Obviously 1 is not full time, but I think occasional is fine. It's probably hard to both explain complicated math and check comprehension in parallel anyways. And a serial process is a nice break of the flow anyways.
– guest
20 hours ago
1
w.r.t. point 1: that's fine if you've got a tie-clip mic, but facing the board can make you hard to hear if there's a lectern mic or none at all. Obviously this depends on the size and acoustics of the room as well as your voice, but it doesn't have to be a big room.
– Chris H
18 hours ago
1
@PyRulez My son has toy "spy glasses" with small mirrors at the sides that allow you to look behind you. I guess I'll confiscate them for educational use now.
– Mark
15 hours ago
2
2
I agree to the extent that I don't want the audience to focus on me instead of what I write. My aim is rather that I want more focus on the audience to check for questions and/or whether too many of them are nodding off or generally going on mental-screen-saver...
– Mark
20 hours ago
I agree to the extent that I don't want the audience to focus on me instead of what I write. My aim is rather that I want more focus on the audience to check for questions and/or whether too many of them are nodding off or generally going on mental-screen-saver...
– Mark
20 hours ago
4
4
@Mark Turn around occasionally to check on the audience. I completely agree with the present response. I really dislike writing (or seeing somebody write) on a small pad/paper when it is projected. It is strongly confined and looks like Spock looking into his visor device. When on the blackboard, you make large arm movements, so the whole body movement that produces the writing is obvious to the audience - do not underestimate the effect that it makes, it's far more natural.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
@Mark Turn around occasionally to check on the audience. I completely agree with the present response. I really dislike writing (or seeing somebody write) on a small pad/paper when it is projected. It is strongly confined and looks like Spock looking into his visor device. When on the blackboard, you make large arm movements, so the whole body movement that produces the writing is obvious to the audience - do not underestimate the effect that it makes, it's far more natural.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
Great point. I guess, you could (1) turn occasionally to check fr raised hands or ask for understanding (or oral questioning to test comprehension) or (2) encourage interruption. I would only do (2) in the context of a rather intimate class size. Obviously 1 is not full time, but I think occasional is fine. It's probably hard to both explain complicated math and check comprehension in parallel anyways. And a serial process is a nice break of the flow anyways.
– guest
20 hours ago
Great point. I guess, you could (1) turn occasionally to check fr raised hands or ask for understanding (or oral questioning to test comprehension) or (2) encourage interruption. I would only do (2) in the context of a rather intimate class size. Obviously 1 is not full time, but I think occasional is fine. It's probably hard to both explain complicated math and check comprehension in parallel anyways. And a serial process is a nice break of the flow anyways.
– guest
20 hours ago
1
1
w.r.t. point 1: that's fine if you've got a tie-clip mic, but facing the board can make you hard to hear if there's a lectern mic or none at all. Obviously this depends on the size and acoustics of the room as well as your voice, but it doesn't have to be a big room.
– Chris H
18 hours ago
w.r.t. point 1: that's fine if you've got a tie-clip mic, but facing the board can make you hard to hear if there's a lectern mic or none at all. Obviously this depends on the size and acoustics of the room as well as your voice, but it doesn't have to be a big room.
– Chris H
18 hours ago
1
1
@PyRulez My son has toy "spy glasses" with small mirrors at the sides that allow you to look behind you. I guess I'll confiscate them for educational use now.
– Mark
15 hours ago
@PyRulez My son has toy "spy glasses" with small mirrors at the sides that allow you to look behind you. I guess I'll confiscate them for educational use now.
– Mark
15 hours ago
|
show 2 more comments
The retro-projectors where one wrote on the plastic film allowed one to go "back in time" as it were... rewind...
Of course one could lay a diagram on top then remove it etc
So, you can have a single slide with a particular expression or theorem that you need often and drop it on as necessary.
One comment mentions a "camera" to project a document - one that was used to do this is called an epidiascope...
14
Horrible! I remember a prof using such scrolling projectors, and he kept scrolling around, especially back, to remind audience of previous stuff - impossible to follow, makes you lose thread, you force yourself to read/take notes as fast as you can before the next scrolling takes place; after scrolling back to current stage, you have to constantly search again for location you are reading. Do not use! Stick with the good old blackboard where text does not move all the time! Your back to the audience is a very minor nuisance compared to scrollable plastic film.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
3
There is a modern version of this, where you simply write on paper and a camera transfers this to the projector. This way you can show past notes without moving everything else, but the available writing space is still nowhere near a proper set of 6 or 9 boards, even if you have two of them. I know some people who actually prefer them to blackboards, since you can also prepare some sheets beforehand and don't have to budget time for cleaning if the boards are full.
– mlk
19 hours ago
1
Also another note, those retro-projectors are a problem for left-handed people as the students will only see the writing hand instead of the last written line.
– mlk
19 hours ago
3
@CaptainEmacs so the prof used it badly... There are profs who use blackboards badly, or slides badly...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
1
These projectors were used at ETH Zürich back in the 90s. It wasn't so bad, but I never managed to not stick on the plastic scroll with my sweaty hands, making horrific messes. I remember Marvin Minsky giving a guest lecture using one, resulting in an incomprehensible scroll of modern art. It got snarfed by some students for publication. They are really best if you have your slides prepared beforehand or if you write really slowly and deliberately.
– David Tonhofer
18 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
The retro-projectors where one wrote on the plastic film allowed one to go "back in time" as it were... rewind...
Of course one could lay a diagram on top then remove it etc
So, you can have a single slide with a particular expression or theorem that you need often and drop it on as necessary.
One comment mentions a "camera" to project a document - one that was used to do this is called an epidiascope...
14
Horrible! I remember a prof using such scrolling projectors, and he kept scrolling around, especially back, to remind audience of previous stuff - impossible to follow, makes you lose thread, you force yourself to read/take notes as fast as you can before the next scrolling takes place; after scrolling back to current stage, you have to constantly search again for location you are reading. Do not use! Stick with the good old blackboard where text does not move all the time! Your back to the audience is a very minor nuisance compared to scrollable plastic film.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
3
There is a modern version of this, where you simply write on paper and a camera transfers this to the projector. This way you can show past notes without moving everything else, but the available writing space is still nowhere near a proper set of 6 or 9 boards, even if you have two of them. I know some people who actually prefer them to blackboards, since you can also prepare some sheets beforehand and don't have to budget time for cleaning if the boards are full.
– mlk
19 hours ago
1
Also another note, those retro-projectors are a problem for left-handed people as the students will only see the writing hand instead of the last written line.
– mlk
19 hours ago
3
@CaptainEmacs so the prof used it badly... There are profs who use blackboards badly, or slides badly...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
1
These projectors were used at ETH Zürich back in the 90s. It wasn't so bad, but I never managed to not stick on the plastic scroll with my sweaty hands, making horrific messes. I remember Marvin Minsky giving a guest lecture using one, resulting in an incomprehensible scroll of modern art. It got snarfed by some students for publication. They are really best if you have your slides prepared beforehand or if you write really slowly and deliberately.
– David Tonhofer
18 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
The retro-projectors where one wrote on the plastic film allowed one to go "back in time" as it were... rewind...
Of course one could lay a diagram on top then remove it etc
So, you can have a single slide with a particular expression or theorem that you need often and drop it on as necessary.
One comment mentions a "camera" to project a document - one that was used to do this is called an epidiascope...
The retro-projectors where one wrote on the plastic film allowed one to go "back in time" as it were... rewind...
Of course one could lay a diagram on top then remove it etc
So, you can have a single slide with a particular expression or theorem that you need often and drop it on as necessary.
One comment mentions a "camera" to project a document - one that was used to do this is called an epidiascope...
edited 19 hours ago
answered 20 hours ago
Solar MikeSolar Mike
14.2k52651
14.2k52651
14
Horrible! I remember a prof using such scrolling projectors, and he kept scrolling around, especially back, to remind audience of previous stuff - impossible to follow, makes you lose thread, you force yourself to read/take notes as fast as you can before the next scrolling takes place; after scrolling back to current stage, you have to constantly search again for location you are reading. Do not use! Stick with the good old blackboard where text does not move all the time! Your back to the audience is a very minor nuisance compared to scrollable plastic film.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
3
There is a modern version of this, where you simply write on paper and a camera transfers this to the projector. This way you can show past notes without moving everything else, but the available writing space is still nowhere near a proper set of 6 or 9 boards, even if you have two of them. I know some people who actually prefer them to blackboards, since you can also prepare some sheets beforehand and don't have to budget time for cleaning if the boards are full.
– mlk
19 hours ago
1
Also another note, those retro-projectors are a problem for left-handed people as the students will only see the writing hand instead of the last written line.
– mlk
19 hours ago
3
@CaptainEmacs so the prof used it badly... There are profs who use blackboards badly, or slides badly...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
1
These projectors were used at ETH Zürich back in the 90s. It wasn't so bad, but I never managed to not stick on the plastic scroll with my sweaty hands, making horrific messes. I remember Marvin Minsky giving a guest lecture using one, resulting in an incomprehensible scroll of modern art. It got snarfed by some students for publication. They are really best if you have your slides prepared beforehand or if you write really slowly and deliberately.
– David Tonhofer
18 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
14
Horrible! I remember a prof using such scrolling projectors, and he kept scrolling around, especially back, to remind audience of previous stuff - impossible to follow, makes you lose thread, you force yourself to read/take notes as fast as you can before the next scrolling takes place; after scrolling back to current stage, you have to constantly search again for location you are reading. Do not use! Stick with the good old blackboard where text does not move all the time! Your back to the audience is a very minor nuisance compared to scrollable plastic film.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
3
There is a modern version of this, where you simply write on paper and a camera transfers this to the projector. This way you can show past notes without moving everything else, but the available writing space is still nowhere near a proper set of 6 or 9 boards, even if you have two of them. I know some people who actually prefer them to blackboards, since you can also prepare some sheets beforehand and don't have to budget time for cleaning if the boards are full.
– mlk
19 hours ago
1
Also another note, those retro-projectors are a problem for left-handed people as the students will only see the writing hand instead of the last written line.
– mlk
19 hours ago
3
@CaptainEmacs so the prof used it badly... There are profs who use blackboards badly, or slides badly...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
1
These projectors were used at ETH Zürich back in the 90s. It wasn't so bad, but I never managed to not stick on the plastic scroll with my sweaty hands, making horrific messes. I remember Marvin Minsky giving a guest lecture using one, resulting in an incomprehensible scroll of modern art. It got snarfed by some students for publication. They are really best if you have your slides prepared beforehand or if you write really slowly and deliberately.
– David Tonhofer
18 hours ago
14
14
Horrible! I remember a prof using such scrolling projectors, and he kept scrolling around, especially back, to remind audience of previous stuff - impossible to follow, makes you lose thread, you force yourself to read/take notes as fast as you can before the next scrolling takes place; after scrolling back to current stage, you have to constantly search again for location you are reading. Do not use! Stick with the good old blackboard where text does not move all the time! Your back to the audience is a very minor nuisance compared to scrollable plastic film.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
Horrible! I remember a prof using such scrolling projectors, and he kept scrolling around, especially back, to remind audience of previous stuff - impossible to follow, makes you lose thread, you force yourself to read/take notes as fast as you can before the next scrolling takes place; after scrolling back to current stage, you have to constantly search again for location you are reading. Do not use! Stick with the good old blackboard where text does not move all the time! Your back to the audience is a very minor nuisance compared to scrollable plastic film.
– Captain Emacs
20 hours ago
3
3
There is a modern version of this, where you simply write on paper and a camera transfers this to the projector. This way you can show past notes without moving everything else, but the available writing space is still nowhere near a proper set of 6 or 9 boards, even if you have two of them. I know some people who actually prefer them to blackboards, since you can also prepare some sheets beforehand and don't have to budget time for cleaning if the boards are full.
– mlk
19 hours ago
There is a modern version of this, where you simply write on paper and a camera transfers this to the projector. This way you can show past notes without moving everything else, but the available writing space is still nowhere near a proper set of 6 or 9 boards, even if you have two of them. I know some people who actually prefer them to blackboards, since you can also prepare some sheets beforehand and don't have to budget time for cleaning if the boards are full.
– mlk
19 hours ago
1
1
Also another note, those retro-projectors are a problem for left-handed people as the students will only see the writing hand instead of the last written line.
– mlk
19 hours ago
Also another note, those retro-projectors are a problem for left-handed people as the students will only see the writing hand instead of the last written line.
– mlk
19 hours ago
3
3
@CaptainEmacs so the prof used it badly... There are profs who use blackboards badly, or slides badly...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
@CaptainEmacs so the prof used it badly... There are profs who use blackboards badly, or slides badly...
– Solar Mike
19 hours ago
1
1
These projectors were used at ETH Zürich back in the 90s. It wasn't so bad, but I never managed to not stick on the plastic scroll with my sweaty hands, making horrific messes. I remember Marvin Minsky giving a guest lecture using one, resulting in an incomprehensible scroll of modern art. It got snarfed by some students for publication. They are really best if you have your slides prepared beforehand or if you write really slowly and deliberately.
– David Tonhofer
18 hours ago
These projectors were used at ETH Zürich back in the 90s. It wasn't so bad, but I never managed to not stick on the plastic scroll with my sweaty hands, making horrific messes. I remember Marvin Minsky giving a guest lecture using one, resulting in an incomprehensible scroll of modern art. It got snarfed by some students for publication. They are really best if you have your slides prepared beforehand or if you write really slowly and deliberately.
– David Tonhofer
18 hours ago
|
show 7 more comments
There is an extremely simple solution to this, which is that you stand sideways, with the students on your left and the board on the right. When you turn your head to the left, you're looking at your students. When you write, your body isn't blocking the board, or is at most only temporarily and partially blocking it. When you pause to explain something or ask for questions, you can turn your whole body toward the class and step a little to the side so that everyone has a clear view.
It's not particularly difficult to write in the sideways stance, and it doesn't even really take any practice. When I call students to the board to present their work, I just briefly demonstrate it to them, and they generally can do it immediately.
add a comment |
There is an extremely simple solution to this, which is that you stand sideways, with the students on your left and the board on the right. When you turn your head to the left, you're looking at your students. When you write, your body isn't blocking the board, or is at most only temporarily and partially blocking it. When you pause to explain something or ask for questions, you can turn your whole body toward the class and step a little to the side so that everyone has a clear view.
It's not particularly difficult to write in the sideways stance, and it doesn't even really take any practice. When I call students to the board to present their work, I just briefly demonstrate it to them, and they generally can do it immediately.
add a comment |
There is an extremely simple solution to this, which is that you stand sideways, with the students on your left and the board on the right. When you turn your head to the left, you're looking at your students. When you write, your body isn't blocking the board, or is at most only temporarily and partially blocking it. When you pause to explain something or ask for questions, you can turn your whole body toward the class and step a little to the side so that everyone has a clear view.
It's not particularly difficult to write in the sideways stance, and it doesn't even really take any practice. When I call students to the board to present their work, I just briefly demonstrate it to them, and they generally can do it immediately.
There is an extremely simple solution to this, which is that you stand sideways, with the students on your left and the board on the right. When you turn your head to the left, you're looking at your students. When you write, your body isn't blocking the board, or is at most only temporarily and partially blocking it. When you pause to explain something or ask for questions, you can turn your whole body toward the class and step a little to the side so that everyone has a clear view.
It's not particularly difficult to write in the sideways stance, and it doesn't even really take any practice. When I call students to the board to present their work, I just briefly demonstrate it to them, and they generally can do it immediately.
answered 12 hours ago
Ben CrowellBen Crowell
12.7k23770
12.7k23770
add a comment |
add a comment |
This answer is going to broaden the question asked to instead be, "How can I give the students a better experience, while still delivering content through speaking and hand-writing?"
I would suggest spending dramatically less time lecturing in class. Instead, record the (majority of your) lectures electronically, and share them with your students online. You can use whatever setup you like -- writing on the board(s), writing on paper, writing on a tablet, writing on glass and having the image left-right reversed -- with one or more cameras recording your lectures. You can edit the footage as you like, to allow the parallel displays you enjoy for example.
This has several important benefits:
- Students can view your lectures at their own pace, at their own convenience, with the ability to pause, rewind, replay, and fast-forward.
- You can use class-time more effectively, by taking advantage of the circumstance of all these people in the same room. Have them talk to each other! They can work on exercises, or go through details of proofs, or work on more ambitious projects. Small groups are most effective, size 3 or 4.
Both of the above benefits are much more important than the ability to see your face during lectures.
That sounds great, but what if there are 200+ students, as was the case in my undergraduate lectures.
– JeremyC
5 hours ago
1. OP asks about graduate courses. 2. Even with 200+ students, some of the classtime can be spent in active learning.
– vadim123
4 hours ago
add a comment |
This answer is going to broaden the question asked to instead be, "How can I give the students a better experience, while still delivering content through speaking and hand-writing?"
I would suggest spending dramatically less time lecturing in class. Instead, record the (majority of your) lectures electronically, and share them with your students online. You can use whatever setup you like -- writing on the board(s), writing on paper, writing on a tablet, writing on glass and having the image left-right reversed -- with one or more cameras recording your lectures. You can edit the footage as you like, to allow the parallel displays you enjoy for example.
This has several important benefits:
- Students can view your lectures at their own pace, at their own convenience, with the ability to pause, rewind, replay, and fast-forward.
- You can use class-time more effectively, by taking advantage of the circumstance of all these people in the same room. Have them talk to each other! They can work on exercises, or go through details of proofs, or work on more ambitious projects. Small groups are most effective, size 3 or 4.
Both of the above benefits are much more important than the ability to see your face during lectures.
That sounds great, but what if there are 200+ students, as was the case in my undergraduate lectures.
– JeremyC
5 hours ago
1. OP asks about graduate courses. 2. Even with 200+ students, some of the classtime can be spent in active learning.
– vadim123
4 hours ago
add a comment |
This answer is going to broaden the question asked to instead be, "How can I give the students a better experience, while still delivering content through speaking and hand-writing?"
I would suggest spending dramatically less time lecturing in class. Instead, record the (majority of your) lectures electronically, and share them with your students online. You can use whatever setup you like -- writing on the board(s), writing on paper, writing on a tablet, writing on glass and having the image left-right reversed -- with one or more cameras recording your lectures. You can edit the footage as you like, to allow the parallel displays you enjoy for example.
This has several important benefits:
- Students can view your lectures at their own pace, at their own convenience, with the ability to pause, rewind, replay, and fast-forward.
- You can use class-time more effectively, by taking advantage of the circumstance of all these people in the same room. Have them talk to each other! They can work on exercises, or go through details of proofs, or work on more ambitious projects. Small groups are most effective, size 3 or 4.
Both of the above benefits are much more important than the ability to see your face during lectures.
This answer is going to broaden the question asked to instead be, "How can I give the students a better experience, while still delivering content through speaking and hand-writing?"
I would suggest spending dramatically less time lecturing in class. Instead, record the (majority of your) lectures electronically, and share them with your students online. You can use whatever setup you like -- writing on the board(s), writing on paper, writing on a tablet, writing on glass and having the image left-right reversed -- with one or more cameras recording your lectures. You can edit the footage as you like, to allow the parallel displays you enjoy for example.
This has several important benefits:
- Students can view your lectures at their own pace, at their own convenience, with the ability to pause, rewind, replay, and fast-forward.
- You can use class-time more effectively, by taking advantage of the circumstance of all these people in the same room. Have them talk to each other! They can work on exercises, or go through details of proofs, or work on more ambitious projects. Small groups are most effective, size 3 or 4.
Both of the above benefits are much more important than the ability to see your face during lectures.
answered 12 hours ago
vadim123vadim123
3,8701020
3,8701020
That sounds great, but what if there are 200+ students, as was the case in my undergraduate lectures.
– JeremyC
5 hours ago
1. OP asks about graduate courses. 2. Even with 200+ students, some of the classtime can be spent in active learning.
– vadim123
4 hours ago
add a comment |
That sounds great, but what if there are 200+ students, as was the case in my undergraduate lectures.
– JeremyC
5 hours ago
1. OP asks about graduate courses. 2. Even with 200+ students, some of the classtime can be spent in active learning.
– vadim123
4 hours ago
That sounds great, but what if there are 200+ students, as was the case in my undergraduate lectures.
– JeremyC
5 hours ago
That sounds great, but what if there are 200+ students, as was the case in my undergraduate lectures.
– JeremyC
5 hours ago
1. OP asks about graduate courses. 2. Even with 200+ students, some of the classtime can be spent in active learning.
– vadim123
4 hours ago
1. OP asks about graduate courses. 2. Even with 200+ students, some of the classtime can be spent in active learning.
– vadim123
4 hours ago
add a comment |
The document camera is, in my experience, the best approach by far.
It has a couple of unique advantages, including producing permanent copies of the lecture notes, both for your benefit when preparing exams and (possibly) for the students' benefit (if you decide to make these notes available, whether to everyone or only in special circumstances). Another advantage is that it's more natural to use than a vertically-mounted chalk- or dry erase-board, so your handwriting comes out more much readable and requires less effort. Finally, it is more accessible to students sitting in the back of the room, where blackboards are generally unreadable due to size, shadows, etc.
The only significant drawback is the need for specialized equipment. But if your institution is able to provide that, you should take advantage of it.
The limited display capability is not a real drawback. It is quite rare that you need to project more than half or two-thirds of a sheet of paper at a time. It simply isn't feasible to talk about that many different things at once. If nothing else, it forces you to keep in mind the audience's human limitations. If you really need to give a "big picture" view, you can always zoom out on the document camera.
While it isn't strictly necessary to make eye contact with your audience, especially since many students will be looking down to take notes anyway, don't underestimate the advantage of being able to actually connect with your students in appropriate contexts. If you are looking out at the class, it's much easier to judge understanding, see those with questions, and just make yourself seem friendly and approachable.
Document cameras allow you to face forward and give a natural lecture, while maintaining all of the advantages of a "chalk talk".
New contributor
2
Giving an up vote as I think doc cams are the way to go for many things. But in mathematics it is actually quite necessary often-times to allow for people to see as much as three boards' worth of material at a time; I had to today in my linear algebra course.
– kcrisman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
The document camera is, in my experience, the best approach by far.
It has a couple of unique advantages, including producing permanent copies of the lecture notes, both for your benefit when preparing exams and (possibly) for the students' benefit (if you decide to make these notes available, whether to everyone or only in special circumstances). Another advantage is that it's more natural to use than a vertically-mounted chalk- or dry erase-board, so your handwriting comes out more much readable and requires less effort. Finally, it is more accessible to students sitting in the back of the room, where blackboards are generally unreadable due to size, shadows, etc.
The only significant drawback is the need for specialized equipment. But if your institution is able to provide that, you should take advantage of it.
The limited display capability is not a real drawback. It is quite rare that you need to project more than half or two-thirds of a sheet of paper at a time. It simply isn't feasible to talk about that many different things at once. If nothing else, it forces you to keep in mind the audience's human limitations. If you really need to give a "big picture" view, you can always zoom out on the document camera.
While it isn't strictly necessary to make eye contact with your audience, especially since many students will be looking down to take notes anyway, don't underestimate the advantage of being able to actually connect with your students in appropriate contexts. If you are looking out at the class, it's much easier to judge understanding, see those with questions, and just make yourself seem friendly and approachable.
Document cameras allow you to face forward and give a natural lecture, while maintaining all of the advantages of a "chalk talk".
New contributor
2
Giving an up vote as I think doc cams are the way to go for many things. But in mathematics it is actually quite necessary often-times to allow for people to see as much as three boards' worth of material at a time; I had to today in my linear algebra course.
– kcrisman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
The document camera is, in my experience, the best approach by far.
It has a couple of unique advantages, including producing permanent copies of the lecture notes, both for your benefit when preparing exams and (possibly) for the students' benefit (if you decide to make these notes available, whether to everyone or only in special circumstances). Another advantage is that it's more natural to use than a vertically-mounted chalk- or dry erase-board, so your handwriting comes out more much readable and requires less effort. Finally, it is more accessible to students sitting in the back of the room, where blackboards are generally unreadable due to size, shadows, etc.
The only significant drawback is the need for specialized equipment. But if your institution is able to provide that, you should take advantage of it.
The limited display capability is not a real drawback. It is quite rare that you need to project more than half or two-thirds of a sheet of paper at a time. It simply isn't feasible to talk about that many different things at once. If nothing else, it forces you to keep in mind the audience's human limitations. If you really need to give a "big picture" view, you can always zoom out on the document camera.
While it isn't strictly necessary to make eye contact with your audience, especially since many students will be looking down to take notes anyway, don't underestimate the advantage of being able to actually connect with your students in appropriate contexts. If you are looking out at the class, it's much easier to judge understanding, see those with questions, and just make yourself seem friendly and approachable.
Document cameras allow you to face forward and give a natural lecture, while maintaining all of the advantages of a "chalk talk".
New contributor
The document camera is, in my experience, the best approach by far.
It has a couple of unique advantages, including producing permanent copies of the lecture notes, both for your benefit when preparing exams and (possibly) for the students' benefit (if you decide to make these notes available, whether to everyone or only in special circumstances). Another advantage is that it's more natural to use than a vertically-mounted chalk- or dry erase-board, so your handwriting comes out more much readable and requires less effort. Finally, it is more accessible to students sitting in the back of the room, where blackboards are generally unreadable due to size, shadows, etc.
The only significant drawback is the need for specialized equipment. But if your institution is able to provide that, you should take advantage of it.
The limited display capability is not a real drawback. It is quite rare that you need to project more than half or two-thirds of a sheet of paper at a time. It simply isn't feasible to talk about that many different things at once. If nothing else, it forces you to keep in mind the audience's human limitations. If you really need to give a "big picture" view, you can always zoom out on the document camera.
While it isn't strictly necessary to make eye contact with your audience, especially since many students will be looking down to take notes anyway, don't underestimate the advantage of being able to actually connect with your students in appropriate contexts. If you are looking out at the class, it's much easier to judge understanding, see those with questions, and just make yourself seem friendly and approachable.
Document cameras allow you to face forward and give a natural lecture, while maintaining all of the advantages of a "chalk talk".
New contributor
New contributor
answered 11 hours ago
Cody GrayCody Gray
1435
1435
New contributor
New contributor
2
Giving an up vote as I think doc cams are the way to go for many things. But in mathematics it is actually quite necessary often-times to allow for people to see as much as three boards' worth of material at a time; I had to today in my linear algebra course.
– kcrisman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
2
Giving an up vote as I think doc cams are the way to go for many things. But in mathematics it is actually quite necessary often-times to allow for people to see as much as three boards' worth of material at a time; I had to today in my linear algebra course.
– kcrisman
10 hours ago
2
2
Giving an up vote as I think doc cams are the way to go for many things. But in mathematics it is actually quite necessary often-times to allow for people to see as much as three boards' worth of material at a time; I had to today in my linear algebra course.
– kcrisman
10 hours ago
Giving an up vote as I think doc cams are the way to go for many things. But in mathematics it is actually quite necessary often-times to allow for people to see as much as three boards' worth of material at a time; I had to today in my linear algebra course.
– kcrisman
10 hours ago
add a comment |
If the space in which you lecture permits, you could simply put some big mirrors next to or between your blackboards. That would let you continue to write with your back to the audience as you do now while also being able to casually glance at them (or at least some of them) without turning around.
Less unusually, if you're in a small classroom setting you could angle your blackboard a bit away from the class. I've seen plenty of rooms that had a portable blackboard positioned like this before, and it allows the teacher to stand to one side of the blackboard and glance sideways at the class while writing. (I suspect that this is not what usually motivates such setups, and that they're typically done due to a lack of space for the extra blackboard at the front of the room, but there's no reason you can't deliberately use this approach for the visibility benefit.) Of course, in the context of a big lecture hall this would be annoying to the class.
New contributor
add a comment |
If the space in which you lecture permits, you could simply put some big mirrors next to or between your blackboards. That would let you continue to write with your back to the audience as you do now while also being able to casually glance at them (or at least some of them) without turning around.
Less unusually, if you're in a small classroom setting you could angle your blackboard a bit away from the class. I've seen plenty of rooms that had a portable blackboard positioned like this before, and it allows the teacher to stand to one side of the blackboard and glance sideways at the class while writing. (I suspect that this is not what usually motivates such setups, and that they're typically done due to a lack of space for the extra blackboard at the front of the room, but there's no reason you can't deliberately use this approach for the visibility benefit.) Of course, in the context of a big lecture hall this would be annoying to the class.
New contributor
add a comment |
If the space in which you lecture permits, you could simply put some big mirrors next to or between your blackboards. That would let you continue to write with your back to the audience as you do now while also being able to casually glance at them (or at least some of them) without turning around.
Less unusually, if you're in a small classroom setting you could angle your blackboard a bit away from the class. I've seen plenty of rooms that had a portable blackboard positioned like this before, and it allows the teacher to stand to one side of the blackboard and glance sideways at the class while writing. (I suspect that this is not what usually motivates such setups, and that they're typically done due to a lack of space for the extra blackboard at the front of the room, but there's no reason you can't deliberately use this approach for the visibility benefit.) Of course, in the context of a big lecture hall this would be annoying to the class.
New contributor
If the space in which you lecture permits, you could simply put some big mirrors next to or between your blackboards. That would let you continue to write with your back to the audience as you do now while also being able to casually glance at them (or at least some of them) without turning around.
Less unusually, if you're in a small classroom setting you could angle your blackboard a bit away from the class. I've seen plenty of rooms that had a portable blackboard positioned like this before, and it allows the teacher to stand to one side of the blackboard and glance sideways at the class while writing. (I suspect that this is not what usually motivates such setups, and that they're typically done due to a lack of space for the extra blackboard at the front of the room, but there's no reason you can't deliberately use this approach for the visibility benefit.) Of course, in the context of a big lecture hall this would be annoying to the class.
New contributor
edited 14 hours ago
New contributor
answered 14 hours ago
Mark AmeryMark Amery
1136
1136
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
I don't have a lot to add to these contributors in terms of nitty-gritty details, but I think that if you can get it having a good setup with both document camera AND chalkboard is best. (Or possibly multiple doc cams.) At least, that is my experience with mathematics in a number of different settings.
When I am in a room that allows for it, I will have certain definitions just continuously on the board, and then dynamic examples (whether computer-generated or paper) on the camera screen. Or you can use the chalkboard for stuff that has to stay up a long time, for which you know people will be copying down anyway - and then you can stand aside as they (hopefully) internalize.
Or, if you have time ahead of time, put needed definitions on some side boards (we have side whiteboards in some classrooms) that you can point to, while keeping attention up front. In any case, you can think dynamic versus static content for the two 'devices' (if a chalkboard is a device).
It does depend upon the type of course. Honestly, for graduate coursework you'll probably be flying so fast it won't matter what technique you use. Given the setup of many rooms in many universities in many countries (but not all of any of the above, of course), I would recommend the doc cam + chalkboard combination as an easily attainable via media that gets at most of what you want in a lecture-based course.
(Whether you want to do a lecture-based course is a different question, but I won't wade into that here.)
add a comment |
I don't have a lot to add to these contributors in terms of nitty-gritty details, but I think that if you can get it having a good setup with both document camera AND chalkboard is best. (Or possibly multiple doc cams.) At least, that is my experience with mathematics in a number of different settings.
When I am in a room that allows for it, I will have certain definitions just continuously on the board, and then dynamic examples (whether computer-generated or paper) on the camera screen. Or you can use the chalkboard for stuff that has to stay up a long time, for which you know people will be copying down anyway - and then you can stand aside as they (hopefully) internalize.
Or, if you have time ahead of time, put needed definitions on some side boards (we have side whiteboards in some classrooms) that you can point to, while keeping attention up front. In any case, you can think dynamic versus static content for the two 'devices' (if a chalkboard is a device).
It does depend upon the type of course. Honestly, for graduate coursework you'll probably be flying so fast it won't matter what technique you use. Given the setup of many rooms in many universities in many countries (but not all of any of the above, of course), I would recommend the doc cam + chalkboard combination as an easily attainable via media that gets at most of what you want in a lecture-based course.
(Whether you want to do a lecture-based course is a different question, but I won't wade into that here.)
add a comment |
I don't have a lot to add to these contributors in terms of nitty-gritty details, but I think that if you can get it having a good setup with both document camera AND chalkboard is best. (Or possibly multiple doc cams.) At least, that is my experience with mathematics in a number of different settings.
When I am in a room that allows for it, I will have certain definitions just continuously on the board, and then dynamic examples (whether computer-generated or paper) on the camera screen. Or you can use the chalkboard for stuff that has to stay up a long time, for which you know people will be copying down anyway - and then you can stand aside as they (hopefully) internalize.
Or, if you have time ahead of time, put needed definitions on some side boards (we have side whiteboards in some classrooms) that you can point to, while keeping attention up front. In any case, you can think dynamic versus static content for the two 'devices' (if a chalkboard is a device).
It does depend upon the type of course. Honestly, for graduate coursework you'll probably be flying so fast it won't matter what technique you use. Given the setup of many rooms in many universities in many countries (but not all of any of the above, of course), I would recommend the doc cam + chalkboard combination as an easily attainable via media that gets at most of what you want in a lecture-based course.
(Whether you want to do a lecture-based course is a different question, but I won't wade into that here.)
I don't have a lot to add to these contributors in terms of nitty-gritty details, but I think that if you can get it having a good setup with both document camera AND chalkboard is best. (Or possibly multiple doc cams.) At least, that is my experience with mathematics in a number of different settings.
When I am in a room that allows for it, I will have certain definitions just continuously on the board, and then dynamic examples (whether computer-generated or paper) on the camera screen. Or you can use the chalkboard for stuff that has to stay up a long time, for which you know people will be copying down anyway - and then you can stand aside as they (hopefully) internalize.
Or, if you have time ahead of time, put needed definitions on some side boards (we have side whiteboards in some classrooms) that you can point to, while keeping attention up front. In any case, you can think dynamic versus static content for the two 'devices' (if a chalkboard is a device).
It does depend upon the type of course. Honestly, for graduate coursework you'll probably be flying so fast it won't matter what technique you use. Given the setup of many rooms in many universities in many countries (but not all of any of the above, of course), I would recommend the doc cam + chalkboard combination as an easily attainable via media that gets at most of what you want in a lecture-based course.
(Whether you want to do a lecture-based course is a different question, but I won't wade into that here.)
answered 10 hours ago
kcrismankcrisman
1887
1887
add a comment |
add a comment |
I had such a math teacher in college. He would walk in, start writing on the board, and not stop until the end of class, then walk out. It was horrible. Everyone in the class hated it. A few complaints later, and he started turning around periodically to see if there were questions, and if the class was keeping up.
Spending a significant amount of your time with your back to the audience isn't a problem, as long as it's not all of the time. Just check in with the students, and make sure that they know it's ok to interrupt you when your back is turned (assuming you're ok with that).
New contributor
add a comment |
I had such a math teacher in college. He would walk in, start writing on the board, and not stop until the end of class, then walk out. It was horrible. Everyone in the class hated it. A few complaints later, and he started turning around periodically to see if there were questions, and if the class was keeping up.
Spending a significant amount of your time with your back to the audience isn't a problem, as long as it's not all of the time. Just check in with the students, and make sure that they know it's ok to interrupt you when your back is turned (assuming you're ok with that).
New contributor
add a comment |
I had such a math teacher in college. He would walk in, start writing on the board, and not stop until the end of class, then walk out. It was horrible. Everyone in the class hated it. A few complaints later, and he started turning around periodically to see if there were questions, and if the class was keeping up.
Spending a significant amount of your time with your back to the audience isn't a problem, as long as it's not all of the time. Just check in with the students, and make sure that they know it's ok to interrupt you when your back is turned (assuming you're ok with that).
New contributor
I had such a math teacher in college. He would walk in, start writing on the board, and not stop until the end of class, then walk out. It was horrible. Everyone in the class hated it. A few complaints later, and he started turning around periodically to see if there were questions, and if the class was keeping up.
Spending a significant amount of your time with your back to the audience isn't a problem, as long as it's not all of the time. Just check in with the students, and make sure that they know it's ok to interrupt you when your back is turned (assuming you're ok with that).
New contributor
edited 9 hours ago
299792458
2,62821435
2,62821435
New contributor
answered 10 hours ago
TimTim
1
1
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
I think one possible solution could be the use of a camera-projector system also often known as a document camera. A common example I've seen in universities around Canada is ELMO your university may consider investing in these and placing them in classrooms around campus.
This system also allows for you to switch to any detailed diagrams or animations you may want to present to your class through your laptop hooked up to the same projector.
New contributor
add a comment |
I think one possible solution could be the use of a camera-projector system also often known as a document camera. A common example I've seen in universities around Canada is ELMO your university may consider investing in these and placing them in classrooms around campus.
This system also allows for you to switch to any detailed diagrams or animations you may want to present to your class through your laptop hooked up to the same projector.
New contributor
add a comment |
I think one possible solution could be the use of a camera-projector system also often known as a document camera. A common example I've seen in universities around Canada is ELMO your university may consider investing in these and placing them in classrooms around campus.
This system also allows for you to switch to any detailed diagrams or animations you may want to present to your class through your laptop hooked up to the same projector.
New contributor
I think one possible solution could be the use of a camera-projector system also often known as a document camera. A common example I've seen in universities around Canada is ELMO your university may consider investing in these and placing them in classrooms around campus.
This system also allows for you to switch to any detailed diagrams or animations you may want to present to your class through your laptop hooked up to the same projector.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 8 hours ago
KunalKunal
94
94
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
In my opinion complex concepts which involve a lot of mathematical equations are best taught by interacting with the audience and allowing students to write along with the instructor. Many people have suggested here the use of a document camera. How about a transparent-board camera?
I like what Rob Edwards from SDSU uses for his courses on YouTube. For example check out this one. Here is a screenshot:
He uses dark clothing, dark background and a transparent board to write on facing the audience. A camera captures the board content from the front and then inverts the video to project on a display, so that it is in the correct readable orientation.
New contributor
add a comment |
In my opinion complex concepts which involve a lot of mathematical equations are best taught by interacting with the audience and allowing students to write along with the instructor. Many people have suggested here the use of a document camera. How about a transparent-board camera?
I like what Rob Edwards from SDSU uses for his courses on YouTube. For example check out this one. Here is a screenshot:
He uses dark clothing, dark background and a transparent board to write on facing the audience. A camera captures the board content from the front and then inverts the video to project on a display, so that it is in the correct readable orientation.
New contributor
add a comment |
In my opinion complex concepts which involve a lot of mathematical equations are best taught by interacting with the audience and allowing students to write along with the instructor. Many people have suggested here the use of a document camera. How about a transparent-board camera?
I like what Rob Edwards from SDSU uses for his courses on YouTube. For example check out this one. Here is a screenshot:
He uses dark clothing, dark background and a transparent board to write on facing the audience. A camera captures the board content from the front and then inverts the video to project on a display, so that it is in the correct readable orientation.
New contributor
In my opinion complex concepts which involve a lot of mathematical equations are best taught by interacting with the audience and allowing students to write along with the instructor. Many people have suggested here the use of a document camera. How about a transparent-board camera?
I like what Rob Edwards from SDSU uses for his courses on YouTube. For example check out this one. Here is a screenshot:
He uses dark clothing, dark background and a transparent board to write on facing the audience. A camera captures the board content from the front and then inverts the video to project on a display, so that it is in the correct readable orientation.
New contributor
New contributor
answered 7 hours ago
kedarpskedarps
1011
1011
New contributor
New contributor
add a comment |
add a comment |
You could write up the main points one butcher paper, then roll them up and put them on the walls. Then you can write out the detailed steps and project them onto the board, then as you finish a section, unroll the summary. This will also provide a stopping point for people to ask questions.
add a comment |
You could write up the main points one butcher paper, then roll them up and put them on the walls. Then you can write out the detailed steps and project them onto the board, then as you finish a section, unroll the summary. This will also provide a stopping point for people to ask questions.
add a comment |
You could write up the main points one butcher paper, then roll them up and put them on the walls. Then you can write out the detailed steps and project them onto the board, then as you finish a section, unroll the summary. This will also provide a stopping point for people to ask questions.
You could write up the main points one butcher paper, then roll them up and put them on the walls. Then you can write out the detailed steps and project them onto the board, then as you finish a section, unroll the summary. This will also provide a stopping point for people to ask questions.
answered 6 hours ago
AcccumulationAcccumulation
1,51939
1,51939
add a comment |
add a comment |
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Mark is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Academia Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2facademia.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f126740%2fmimic-lecturing-on-blackboard-facing-audience%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
Also posted at Mathematics Educators Stack Exchange.
– Joel Reyes Noche
19 hours ago
1
This thread should be thought-provoking, matheducators.stackexchange.com/a/731/689
– Alecos Papadopoulos
8 hours ago
Gadgets are not necessarily an improvement, vide the succession: Blackboard -> Overhead Projector -> Power Point
-- EWD1305– Tobia Tesan
6 hours ago
1
What prevents you from simply doing both? have a set of slides prepared and do them, and if you feel the need, use the blackboard. This allows you to react on questions from the audience quite dynamically, while reaping in all benefits of using slides. And if you notice that what you have on the blackboard is essential, just include it in the slides for the next time you give the same course. This allows iterating on and improving the slides as well.
– Polygnome
3 hours ago
In my experience, the main disadvantage of this method is that my institution believes it is old-fashioned and therefore, without argument, automatically bad. As such they refuse to support it by maintaining blackboards properly, etc. Not my problem - not my students' problem - purely the institution's problem. <end rant>
– David
1 hour ago