Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin The Next CEO of Stack OverflowPrepend x/ to line where x is a variable on each lineWhat's the command to “prepend” a line to a file?Extract data from line and prepend to the line?Read the last line of tzselectExtract last line of multiline stringHow do I turn entire stdin into a command line argument verbatim?How do I prepend a line read from STDIN with an epoch timestamp?How can one prepend text to each line of a multi-line variable?Prepend string before each line of stdinCheck if no command line arguments and STDIN is empty
Why did the Drakh emissary look so blurred in S04:E11 "Lines of Communication"?
Find a path from s to t using as few red nodes as possible
How do I secure a TV wall mount?
Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?
Salesforce opportunity stages
Planeswalker Ability and Death Timing
What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?
What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?
How can I separate the number from the unit in argument?
Upgrading From a 9 Speed Sora Derailleur?
Is it correct to say moon starry nights?
Shortening a title without changing its meaning
Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?
Why did early computer designers eschew integers?
Does Germany produce more waste than the US?
Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?
Strange use of "whether ... than ..." in official text
Creating a script with console commands
My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?
Why does freezing point matter when picking cooler ice packs?
Can a PhD from a non-TU9 German university become a professor in a TU9 university?
Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?
Car headlights in a world without electricity
Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?
Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin
The Next CEO of Stack OverflowPrepend x/ to line where x is a variable on each lineWhat's the command to “prepend” a line to a file?Extract data from line and prepend to the line?Read the last line of tzselectExtract last line of multiline stringHow do I turn entire stdin into a command line argument verbatim?How do I prepend a line read from STDIN with an epoch timestamp?How can one prepend text to each line of a multi-line variable?Prepend string before each line of stdinCheck if no command line arguments and STDIN is empty
Consider this script:
tmpfile=$(mktemp)
cat <<EOS > "$tmpfile"
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"
This works and outputs:
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Let's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:
cat <<EOS | # what goes here now?
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
How do we modify the command:
cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"
So that it still produces the same output, in this different context?
NOTE: The specific Heredoc I'm catting, as well as the use of a Heredoc itself, is merely illustrative. Any acceptable answer should assume that it is receiving arbitrary data via stdin.
bash
add a comment |
Consider this script:
tmpfile=$(mktemp)
cat <<EOS > "$tmpfile"
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"
This works and outputs:
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Let's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:
cat <<EOS | # what goes here now?
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
How do we modify the command:
cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"
So that it still produces the same output, in this different context?
NOTE: The specific Heredoc I'm catting, as well as the use of a Heredoc itself, is merely illustrative. Any acceptable answer should assume that it is receiving arbitrary data via stdin.
bash
stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.
– mosvy
yesterday
1
@mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.
– Jonah
yesterday
2
@mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.
– wizzwizz4
yesterday
add a comment |
Consider this script:
tmpfile=$(mktemp)
cat <<EOS > "$tmpfile"
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"
This works and outputs:
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Let's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:
cat <<EOS | # what goes here now?
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
How do we modify the command:
cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"
So that it still produces the same output, in this different context?
NOTE: The specific Heredoc I'm catting, as well as the use of a Heredoc itself, is merely illustrative. Any acceptable answer should assume that it is receiving arbitrary data via stdin.
bash
Consider this script:
tmpfile=$(mktemp)
cat <<EOS > "$tmpfile"
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"
This works and outputs:
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Let's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:
cat <<EOS | # what goes here now?
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
How do we modify the command:
cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"
So that it still produces the same output, in this different context?
NOTE: The specific Heredoc I'm catting, as well as the use of a Heredoc itself, is merely illustrative. Any acceptable answer should assume that it is receiving arbitrary data via stdin.
bash
bash
edited 16 hours ago
Jonah
asked 2 days ago
JonahJonah
4591513
4591513
stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.
– mosvy
yesterday
1
@mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.
– Jonah
yesterday
2
@mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.
– wizzwizz4
yesterday
add a comment |
stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.
– mosvy
yesterday
1
@mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.
– Jonah
yesterday
2
@mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.
– wizzwizz4
yesterday
stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.
– mosvy
yesterday
stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.
– mosvy
yesterday
1
1
@mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.
– Jonah
yesterday
@mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.
– Jonah
yesterday
2
2
@mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.
– wizzwizz4
yesterday
@mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.
– wizzwizz4
yesterday
add a comment |
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
Try:
awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
Example
Define a variable with our input:
$ input="line 1
> line 2
> line 3"
Run our command:
$ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:
$ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
How it works
x=x $0 ORS
This appends each line of input to the variable
x
.In awk,
ORS
is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x
After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line,
$0
, followed by the contents of the whole file,x
.
Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.
Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the waytee
does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?
– Jonah
2 days ago
add a comment |
If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:
seek operators are available in the zsh
or ksh93
shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash
. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash
if you have to use bash
.
ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...
Or
zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...
Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.
Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.
With a tempfile, with zsh
, you could do it with:
seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'
If on Linux, with bash
or zsh
or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:
seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
EOF
add a comment |
cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
The issue with translating this to something that uses tail
is that tail
needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to
- Provide the full contents of the document to
tail
. - Provide it again to
cat
. - In that order.
The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee
does that) but to get the output of tail
to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.
Using sed
(or awk
, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.
The sed
solution that I propose is to
1h;d;
, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.H
, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.$G;p;
, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.
This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed
, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed
and BSD sed
is doing).
If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:
mkfifo mypipe
cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
rm -f mypipe
This uses tee
to send the data down mypipe
and at the same time to cat
. The cat
utility will first read the output from tail
(which reads from mypipe
, which tee
is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee
.
There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee
's writing to mypipe
and cat
would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat
read from it. cat
would not read from it until tail
had finished. And tail
would not finish until tee
had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.
The variation
tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -
has the same issue.
2
Thesed
one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybesed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'
). Also note that severalsed
implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.
– Stéphane Chazelas
2 days ago
The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?
– Jonah
yesterday
add a comment |
There is a tool named pee
in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).
If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:
cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Ordering of the commands run through pee
is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.
add a comment |
Try:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.
Now suppose line 3
comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline
:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
$lastline
line 1
line 2
$lastline
EOS
In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:
cat <<EOS
this is template text
here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
EOS
We can interpolate multiple lines:
cat <<EOS
multi line
preamble
$(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
epilog
EOS
In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.
1
I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. Thecat <<EOS...
in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?
– Jonah
yesterday
@Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.
– Kaz
yesterday
1
I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.
– Jonah
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1)
.
As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.
add a comment |
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509621%2fprepend-last-line-of-stdin-to-entire-stdin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
6 Answers
6
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Try:
awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
Example
Define a variable with our input:
$ input="line 1
> line 2
> line 3"
Run our command:
$ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:
$ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
How it works
x=x $0 ORS
This appends each line of input to the variable
x
.In awk,
ORS
is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x
After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line,
$0
, followed by the contents of the whole file,x
.
Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.
Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the waytee
does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?
– Jonah
2 days ago
add a comment |
Try:
awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
Example
Define a variable with our input:
$ input="line 1
> line 2
> line 3"
Run our command:
$ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:
$ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
How it works
x=x $0 ORS
This appends each line of input to the variable
x
.In awk,
ORS
is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x
After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line,
$0
, followed by the contents of the whole file,x
.
Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.
Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the waytee
does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?
– Jonah
2 days ago
add a comment |
Try:
awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
Example
Define a variable with our input:
$ input="line 1
> line 2
> line 3"
Run our command:
$ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:
$ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
How it works
x=x $0 ORS
This appends each line of input to the variable
x
.In awk,
ORS
is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x
After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line,
$0
, followed by the contents of the whole file,x
.
Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.
Try:
awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
Example
Define a variable with our input:
$ input="line 1
> line 2
> line 3"
Run our command:
$ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:
$ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
How it works
x=x $0 ORS
This appends each line of input to the variable
x
.In awk,
ORS
is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x
After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line,
$0
, followed by the contents of the whole file,x
.
Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.
edited 2 days ago
Stéphane Chazelas
312k57591948
312k57591948
answered 2 days ago
John1024John1024
48.2k5113128
48.2k5113128
Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the waytee
does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?
– Jonah
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the waytee
does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?
– Jonah
2 days ago
Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way
tee
does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?– Jonah
2 days ago
Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way
tee
does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?– Jonah
2 days ago
add a comment |
If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:
seek operators are available in the zsh
or ksh93
shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash
. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash
if you have to use bash
.
ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...
Or
zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...
Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.
Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.
With a tempfile, with zsh
, you could do it with:
seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'
If on Linux, with bash
or zsh
or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:
seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
EOF
add a comment |
If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:
seek operators are available in the zsh
or ksh93
shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash
. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash
if you have to use bash
.
ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...
Or
zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...
Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.
Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.
With a tempfile, with zsh
, you could do it with:
seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'
If on Linux, with bash
or zsh
or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:
seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
EOF
add a comment |
If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:
seek operators are available in the zsh
or ksh93
shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash
. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash
if you have to use bash
.
ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...
Or
zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...
Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.
Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.
With a tempfile, with zsh
, you could do it with:
seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'
If on Linux, with bash
or zsh
or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:
seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
EOF
If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:
seek operators are available in the zsh
or ksh93
shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash
. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash
if you have to use bash
.
ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...
Or
zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...
Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.
Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.
With a tempfile, with zsh
, you could do it with:
seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'
If on Linux, with bash
or zsh
or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:
seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
EOF
answered 2 days ago
Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas
312k57591948
312k57591948
add a comment |
add a comment |
cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
The issue with translating this to something that uses tail
is that tail
needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to
- Provide the full contents of the document to
tail
. - Provide it again to
cat
. - In that order.
The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee
does that) but to get the output of tail
to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.
Using sed
(or awk
, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.
The sed
solution that I propose is to
1h;d;
, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.H
, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.$G;p;
, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.
This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed
, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed
and BSD sed
is doing).
If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:
mkfifo mypipe
cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
rm -f mypipe
This uses tee
to send the data down mypipe
and at the same time to cat
. The cat
utility will first read the output from tail
(which reads from mypipe
, which tee
is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee
.
There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee
's writing to mypipe
and cat
would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat
read from it. cat
would not read from it until tail
had finished. And tail
would not finish until tee
had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.
The variation
tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -
has the same issue.
2
Thesed
one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybesed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'
). Also note that severalsed
implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.
– Stéphane Chazelas
2 days ago
The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?
– Jonah
yesterday
add a comment |
cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
The issue with translating this to something that uses tail
is that tail
needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to
- Provide the full contents of the document to
tail
. - Provide it again to
cat
. - In that order.
The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee
does that) but to get the output of tail
to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.
Using sed
(or awk
, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.
The sed
solution that I propose is to
1h;d;
, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.H
, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.$G;p;
, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.
This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed
, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed
and BSD sed
is doing).
If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:
mkfifo mypipe
cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
rm -f mypipe
This uses tee
to send the data down mypipe
and at the same time to cat
. The cat
utility will first read the output from tail
(which reads from mypipe
, which tee
is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee
.
There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee
's writing to mypipe
and cat
would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat
read from it. cat
would not read from it until tail
had finished. And tail
would not finish until tee
had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.
The variation
tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -
has the same issue.
2
Thesed
one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybesed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'
). Also note that severalsed
implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.
– Stéphane Chazelas
2 days ago
The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?
– Jonah
yesterday
add a comment |
cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
The issue with translating this to something that uses tail
is that tail
needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to
- Provide the full contents of the document to
tail
. - Provide it again to
cat
. - In that order.
The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee
does that) but to get the output of tail
to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.
Using sed
(or awk
, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.
The sed
solution that I propose is to
1h;d;
, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.H
, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.$G;p;
, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.
This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed
, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed
and BSD sed
is doing).
If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:
mkfifo mypipe
cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
rm -f mypipe
This uses tee
to send the data down mypipe
and at the same time to cat
. The cat
utility will first read the output from tail
(which reads from mypipe
, which tee
is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee
.
There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee
's writing to mypipe
and cat
would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat
read from it. cat
would not read from it until tail
had finished. And tail
would not finish until tee
had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.
The variation
tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -
has the same issue.
cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
The issue with translating this to something that uses tail
is that tail
needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to
- Provide the full contents of the document to
tail
. - Provide it again to
cat
. - In that order.
The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee
does that) but to get the output of tail
to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.
Using sed
(or awk
, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.
The sed
solution that I propose is to
1h;d;
, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.H
, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.$G;p;
, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.
This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed
, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed
and BSD sed
is doing).
If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:
mkfifo mypipe
cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
rm -f mypipe
This uses tee
to send the data down mypipe
and at the same time to cat
. The cat
utility will first read the output from tail
(which reads from mypipe
, which tee
is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee
.
There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee
's writing to mypipe
and cat
would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat
read from it. cat
would not read from it until tail
had finished. And tail
would not finish until tee
had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.
The variation
tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -
has the same issue.
edited 2 days ago
answered 2 days ago
Kusalananda♦Kusalananda
139k17259430
139k17259430
2
Thesed
one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybesed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'
). Also note that severalsed
implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.
– Stéphane Chazelas
2 days ago
The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?
– Jonah
yesterday
add a comment |
2
Thesed
one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybesed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'
). Also note that severalsed
implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.
– Stéphane Chazelas
2 days ago
The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?
– Jonah
yesterday
2
2
The
sed
one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'
). Also note that several sed
implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.– Stéphane Chazelas
2 days ago
The
sed
one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'
). Also note that several sed
implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.– Stéphane Chazelas
2 days ago
The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?
– Jonah
yesterday
The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?
– Jonah
yesterday
add a comment |
There is a tool named pee
in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).
If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:
cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Ordering of the commands run through pee
is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.
add a comment |
There is a tool named pee
in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).
If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:
cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Ordering of the commands run through pee
is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.
add a comment |
There is a tool named pee
in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).
If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:
cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Ordering of the commands run through pee
is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.
There is a tool named pee
in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).
If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:
cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Ordering of the commands run through pee
is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.
answered 2 days ago
LL3LL3
6217
6217
add a comment |
add a comment |
Try:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.
Now suppose line 3
comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline
:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
$lastline
line 1
line 2
$lastline
EOS
In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:
cat <<EOS
this is template text
here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
EOS
We can interpolate multiple lines:
cat <<EOS
multi line
preamble
$(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
epilog
EOS
In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.
1
I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. Thecat <<EOS...
in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?
– Jonah
yesterday
@Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.
– Kaz
yesterday
1
I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.
– Jonah
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
Try:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.
Now suppose line 3
comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline
:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
$lastline
line 1
line 2
$lastline
EOS
In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:
cat <<EOS
this is template text
here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
EOS
We can interpolate multiple lines:
cat <<EOS
multi line
preamble
$(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
epilog
EOS
In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.
1
I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. Thecat <<EOS...
in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?
– Jonah
yesterday
@Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.
– Kaz
yesterday
1
I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.
– Jonah
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
Try:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.
Now suppose line 3
comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline
:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
$lastline
line 1
line 2
$lastline
EOS
In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:
cat <<EOS
this is template text
here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
EOS
We can interpolate multiple lines:
cat <<EOS
multi line
preamble
$(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
epilog
EOS
In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.
Try:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.
Now suppose line 3
comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline
:
cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
$lastline
line 1
line 2
$lastline
EOS
In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:
cat <<EOS
this is template text
here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
EOS
We can interpolate multiple lines:
cat <<EOS
multi line
preamble
$(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
epilog
EOS
In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.
edited yesterday
answered yesterday
KazKaz
4,73211733
4,73211733
1
I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. Thecat <<EOS...
in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?
– Jonah
yesterday
@Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.
– Kaz
yesterday
1
I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.
– Jonah
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
1
I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. Thecat <<EOS...
in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?
– Jonah
yesterday
@Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.
– Kaz
yesterday
1
I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
1
I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The
cat <<EOS...
in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?– Jonah
yesterday
I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The
cat <<EOS...
in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?– Jonah
yesterday
@Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.
– Kaz
yesterday
@Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.
– Kaz
yesterday
1
1
I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.
– Jonah
yesterday
I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
1
Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.
– Jonah
yesterday
Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.
– Jonah
yesterday
1
1
Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.
– Jonah
yesterday
Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.
– Jonah
yesterday
|
show 5 more comments
If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1)
.
As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.
add a comment |
If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1)
.
As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.
add a comment |
If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1)
.
As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.
If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1)
.
As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.
answered 2 days ago
ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor
12.2k42561
12.2k42561
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509621%2fprepend-last-line-of-stdin-to-entire-stdin%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.
– mosvy
yesterday
1
@mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.
– Jonah
yesterday
2
@mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.
– wizzwizz4
yesterday