Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin The Next CEO of Stack OverflowPrepend x/ to line where x is a variable on each lineWhat's the command to “prepend” a line to a file?Extract data from line and prepend to the line?Read the last line of tzselectExtract last line of multiline stringHow do I turn entire stdin into a command line argument verbatim?How do I prepend a line read from STDIN with an epoch timestamp?How can one prepend text to each line of a multi-line variable?Prepend string before each line of stdinCheck if no command line arguments and STDIN is empty

Why did the Drakh emissary look so blurred in S04:E11 "Lines of Communication"?

Find a path from s to t using as few red nodes as possible

How do I secure a TV wall mount?

Why doesn't Shulchan Aruch include the laws of destroying fruit trees?

Salesforce opportunity stages

Planeswalker Ability and Death Timing

What happens if you break a law in another country outside of that country?

What steps are necessary to read a Modern SSD in Medieval Europe?

How can I separate the number from the unit in argument?

Upgrading From a 9 Speed Sora Derailleur?

Is it correct to say moon starry nights?

Shortening a title without changing its meaning

Can you teleport closer to a creature you are Frightened of?

Why did early computer designers eschew integers?

Does Germany produce more waste than the US?

Would a grinding machine be a simple and workable propulsion system for an interplanetary spacecraft?

Strange use of "whether ... than ..." in official text

Creating a script with console commands

My ex-girlfriend uses my Apple ID to login to her iPad, do I have to give her my Apple ID password to reset it?

Why does freezing point matter when picking cooler ice packs?

Can a PhD from a non-TU9 German university become a professor in a TU9 university?

Is it a bad idea to plug the other end of ESD strap to wall ground?

Car headlights in a world without electricity

Is it okay to majorly distort historical facts while writing a fiction story?



Prepend last line of stdin to entire stdin



The Next CEO of Stack OverflowPrepend x/ to line where x is a variable on each lineWhat's the command to “prepend” a line to a file?Extract data from line and prepend to the line?Read the last line of tzselectExtract last line of multiline stringHow do I turn entire stdin into a command line argument verbatim?How do I prepend a line read from STDIN with an epoch timestamp?How can one prepend text to each line of a multi-line variable?Prepend string before each line of stdinCheck if no command line arguments and STDIN is empty










8















Consider this script:



tmpfile=$(mktemp)

cat <<EOS > "$tmpfile"
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS

cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"


This works and outputs:



line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3


Let's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:



cat <<EOS | # what goes here now?
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS


How do we modify the command:



cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"


So that it still produces the same output, in this different context?



NOTE: The specific Heredoc I'm catting, as well as the use of a Heredoc itself, is merely illustrative. Any acceptable answer should assume that it is receiving arbitrary data via stdin.










share|improve this question
























  • stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.

    – mosvy
    yesterday






  • 1





    @mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.

    – Jonah
    yesterday






  • 2





    @mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.

    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday
















8















Consider this script:



tmpfile=$(mktemp)

cat <<EOS > "$tmpfile"
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS

cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"


This works and outputs:



line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3


Let's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:



cat <<EOS | # what goes here now?
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS


How do we modify the command:



cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"


So that it still produces the same output, in this different context?



NOTE: The specific Heredoc I'm catting, as well as the use of a Heredoc itself, is merely illustrative. Any acceptable answer should assume that it is receiving arbitrary data via stdin.










share|improve this question
























  • stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.

    – mosvy
    yesterday






  • 1





    @mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.

    – Jonah
    yesterday






  • 2





    @mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.

    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday














8












8








8








Consider this script:



tmpfile=$(mktemp)

cat <<EOS > "$tmpfile"
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS

cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"


This works and outputs:



line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3


Let's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:



cat <<EOS | # what goes here now?
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS


How do we modify the command:



cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"


So that it still produces the same output, in this different context?



NOTE: The specific Heredoc I'm catting, as well as the use of a Heredoc itself, is merely illustrative. Any acceptable answer should assume that it is receiving arbitrary data via stdin.










share|improve this question
















Consider this script:



tmpfile=$(mktemp)

cat <<EOS > "$tmpfile"
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS

cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"


This works and outputs:



line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3


Let's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:



cat <<EOS | # what goes here now?
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS


How do we modify the command:



cat <(tail -1 "$tmpfile") "$tmpfile"


So that it still produces the same output, in this different context?



NOTE: The specific Heredoc I'm catting, as well as the use of a Heredoc itself, is merely illustrative. Any acceptable answer should assume that it is receiving arbitrary data via stdin.







bash






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 16 hours ago







Jonah

















asked 2 days ago









JonahJonah

4591513




4591513












  • stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.

    – mosvy
    yesterday






  • 1





    @mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.

    – Jonah
    yesterday






  • 2





    @mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.

    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday


















  • stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.

    – mosvy
    yesterday






  • 1





    @mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.

    – Jonah
    yesterday






  • 2





    @mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.

    – wizzwizz4
    yesterday

















stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.

– mosvy
yesterday





stdin is always an "actual file" (a fifo/socket/etc is a file too; not all files are seekable). The answer to your question is either a trivial "use a temporary file" or some horror which will load the whole file in the memory. "How can I retrieve old data from a stream without having stored it anywhere?" cannot have a good answer.

– mosvy
yesterday




1




1





@mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.

– Jonah
yesterday





@mosvy That's a perfectly acceptable answer if you'd like to add it.

– Jonah
yesterday




2




2





@mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.

– wizzwizz4
yesterday






@mosvy As Jonah has said, answers should be posted in the answer box. I know it's tricky to read any of the website at the moment, but please ignore the red that's slowly dripping over your vision and use the lower textarea.

– wizzwizz4
yesterday











6 Answers
6






active

oldest

votes


















6














Try:



awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'


Example



Define a variable with our input:



$ input="line 1
> line 2
> line 3"


Run our command:



$ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3


Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:



$ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
line 1
line 2
line 3
EOS
line 3
line 1
line 2
line 3


How it works




  • x=x $0 ORS



    This appends each line of input to the variable x.



    In awk, ORS is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.




  • ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x



    After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line, $0, followed by the contents of the whole file, x.



Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.






share|improve this answer

























  • Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way tee does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?

    – Jonah
    2 days ago


















5














If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:



seek operators are available in the zsh or ksh93 shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash if you have to use bash.



ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...


Or



zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...


Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.



Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.



With a tempfile, with zsh, you could do it with:



seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'


If on Linux, with bash or zsh or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:



seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
EOF





share|improve this answer






























    4














    cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
    line 1
    line 2
    line 3
    EOS


    The issue with translating this to something that uses tail is that tail needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to



    1. Provide the full contents of the document to tail.

    2. Provide it again to cat.

    3. In that order.

    The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee does that) but to get the output of tail to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.



    Using sed (or awk, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.



    The sed solution that I propose is to




    1. 1h;d;, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.


    2. H, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.


    3. $G;p;, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.

    This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed and BSD sed is doing).




    If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:



    mkfifo mypipe
    cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
    line 1
    line 2
    line 3
    EOS
    rm -f mypipe


    This uses tee to send the data down mypipe and at the same time to cat. The cat utility will first read the output from tail (which reads from mypipe, which tee is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee.



    There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee's writing to mypipe and cat would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat read from it. cat would not read from it until tail had finished. And tail would not finish until tee had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.



    The variation



    tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -


    has the same issue.






    share|improve this answer




















    • 2





      The sed one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'). Also note that several sed implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.

      – Stéphane Chazelas
      2 days ago












    • The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?

      – Jonah
      yesterday


















    2














    There is a tool named pee in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).



    If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:



    cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat 
    line 1
    line 2
    line 3
    EOS


    Ordering of the commands run through pee is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.






    share|improve this answer






























      1














      Try:



      cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
      line 3
      line 1
      line 2
      line 3
      EOS


      Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.



      Now suppose line 3 comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline:



      cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
      $lastline
      line 1
      line 2
      $lastline
      EOS


      In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:



      cat <<EOS
      this is template text
      here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
      EOS


      We can interpolate multiple lines:



      cat <<EOS
      multi line
      preamble
      $(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
      epilog
      EOS


      In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.






      share|improve this answer




















      • 1





        I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The cat <<EOS... in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?

        – Jonah
        yesterday












      • @Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.

        – Kaz
        yesterday







      • 1





        I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.

        – Jonah
        yesterday







      • 1





        Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.

        – Jonah
        yesterday







      • 1





        Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.

        – Jonah
        yesterday


















      0














      If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1).
      As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.






      share|improve this answer























        Your Answer








        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "106"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );













        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509621%2fprepend-last-line-of-stdin-to-entire-stdin%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes








        6 Answers
        6






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        6














        Try:



        awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'


        Example



        Define a variable with our input:



        $ input="line 1
        > line 2
        > line 3"


        Run our command:



        $ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
        line 3
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3


        Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:



        $ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3
        EOS
        line 3
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3


        How it works




        • x=x $0 ORS



          This appends each line of input to the variable x.



          In awk, ORS is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.




        • ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x



          After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line, $0, followed by the contents of the whole file, x.



        Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.






        share|improve this answer

























        • Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way tee does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?

          – Jonah
          2 days ago















        6














        Try:



        awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'


        Example



        Define a variable with our input:



        $ input="line 1
        > line 2
        > line 3"


        Run our command:



        $ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
        line 3
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3


        Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:



        $ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3
        EOS
        line 3
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3


        How it works




        • x=x $0 ORS



          This appends each line of input to the variable x.



          In awk, ORS is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.




        • ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x



          After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line, $0, followed by the contents of the whole file, x.



        Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.






        share|improve this answer

























        • Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way tee does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?

          – Jonah
          2 days ago













        6












        6








        6







        Try:



        awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'


        Example



        Define a variable with our input:



        $ input="line 1
        > line 2
        > line 3"


        Run our command:



        $ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
        line 3
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3


        Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:



        $ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3
        EOS
        line 3
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3


        How it works




        • x=x $0 ORS



          This appends each line of input to the variable x.



          In awk, ORS is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.




        • ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x



          After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line, $0, followed by the contents of the whole file, x.



        Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.






        share|improve this answer















        Try:



        awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'


        Example



        Define a variable with our input:



        $ input="line 1
        > line 2
        > line 3"


        Run our command:



        $ echo "$input" | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
        line 3
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3


        Alternatively, of course, we could use a here-doc:



        $ cat <<EOS | awk 'x=x $0 ORS; ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x'
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3
        EOS
        line 3
        line 1
        line 2
        line 3


        How it works




        • x=x $0 ORS



          This appends each line of input to the variable x.



          In awk, ORS is the output record separator. By default, it is a newline character.




        • ENDprintf "%s", $0 ORS x



          After the we have read in the whole file, this prints the last line, $0, followed by the contents of the whole file, x.



        Since this reads the whole input into memory, it would not be appropriate for large (e.g. gigabyte) inputs.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 2 days ago









        Stéphane Chazelas

        312k57591948




        312k57591948










        answered 2 days ago









        John1024John1024

        48.2k5113128




        48.2k5113128












        • Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way tee does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?

          – Jonah
          2 days ago

















        • Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way tee does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?

          – Jonah
          2 days ago
















        Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way tee does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?

        – Jonah
        2 days ago





        Thanks John. So is it not possible to do this in a way analogous to my named file example in the OP? I was imagining the stdin being duplicated somehow... sort of the way tee does, but of a stdin and a file, we'd be piping the same stdin into two different process substitutions. or anything that would be roughly equivalent to that?

        – Jonah
        2 days ago













        5














        If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:



        seek operators are available in the zsh or ksh93 shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash if you have to use bash.



        ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...


        Or



        zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...


        Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.



        Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.



        With a tempfile, with zsh, you could do it with:



        seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'


        If on Linux, with bash or zsh or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:



        seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
        EOF





        share|improve this answer



























          5














          If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:



          seek operators are available in the zsh or ksh93 shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash if you have to use bash.



          ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...


          Or



          zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...


          Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.



          Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.



          With a tempfile, with zsh, you could do it with:



          seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'


          If on Linux, with bash or zsh or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:



          seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
          EOF





          share|improve this answer

























            5












            5








            5







            If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:



            seek operators are available in the zsh or ksh93 shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash if you have to use bash.



            ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...


            Or



            zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...


            Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.



            Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.



            With a tempfile, with zsh, you could do it with:



            seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'


            If on Linux, with bash or zsh or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:



            seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
            EOF





            share|improve this answer













            If stdin points to a seekable file (like in the case of bash's (but not all other shell's) here documents which are implemented with temp files), you can get the tail and then seek back before reading the full contents:



            seek operators are available in the zsh or ksh93 shells, or scripting languages like tcl/perl/python, but not in bash. But you can always call those more advanced interpreters from bash if you have to use bash.



            ksh93 -c 'tail -n1; cat <#((0))' <<...


            Or



            zsh -c 'zmodload zsh/system; tail -n1; sysseek 0; cat' <<...


            Now, that won't work when stdin points to a non-seekable files like a pipe or socket. Then, the only option is to read and store (in memory or in a temporary file...) the whole input.



            Some solutions for storing in memory have already been given.



            With a tempfile, with zsh, you could do it with:



            seq 10 | zsh -c ' cat =(sed $w/dev/fd/3); 3>&1'


            If on Linux, with bash or zsh or any shell that uses temp files for here-documents, you could actually use the temp file created by a here-document to store the output:



            seq 10 | cat > /dev/fd/3; tail -n1 /dev/fd/3; cat <&3; 3<<EOF
            EOF






            share|improve this answer












            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            Stéphane ChazelasStéphane Chazelas

            312k57591948




            312k57591948





















                4














                cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS


                The issue with translating this to something that uses tail is that tail needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to



                1. Provide the full contents of the document to tail.

                2. Provide it again to cat.

                3. In that order.

                The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee does that) but to get the output of tail to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.



                Using sed (or awk, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.



                The sed solution that I propose is to




                1. 1h;d;, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.


                2. H, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.


                3. $G;p;, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.

                This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed and BSD sed is doing).




                If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:



                mkfifo mypipe
                cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS
                rm -f mypipe


                This uses tee to send the data down mypipe and at the same time to cat. The cat utility will first read the output from tail (which reads from mypipe, which tee is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee.



                There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee's writing to mypipe and cat would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat read from it. cat would not read from it until tail had finished. And tail would not finish until tee had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.



                The variation



                tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -


                has the same issue.






                share|improve this answer




















                • 2





                  The sed one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'). Also note that several sed implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.

                  – Stéphane Chazelas
                  2 days ago












                • The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?

                  – Jonah
                  yesterday















                4














                cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS


                The issue with translating this to something that uses tail is that tail needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to



                1. Provide the full contents of the document to tail.

                2. Provide it again to cat.

                3. In that order.

                The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee does that) but to get the output of tail to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.



                Using sed (or awk, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.



                The sed solution that I propose is to




                1. 1h;d;, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.


                2. H, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.


                3. $G;p;, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.

                This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed and BSD sed is doing).




                If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:



                mkfifo mypipe
                cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS
                rm -f mypipe


                This uses tee to send the data down mypipe and at the same time to cat. The cat utility will first read the output from tail (which reads from mypipe, which tee is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee.



                There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee's writing to mypipe and cat would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat read from it. cat would not read from it until tail had finished. And tail would not finish until tee had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.



                The variation



                tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -


                has the same issue.






                share|improve this answer




















                • 2





                  The sed one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'). Also note that several sed implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.

                  – Stéphane Chazelas
                  2 days ago












                • The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?

                  – Jonah
                  yesterday













                4












                4








                4







                cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS


                The issue with translating this to something that uses tail is that tail needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to



                1. Provide the full contents of the document to tail.

                2. Provide it again to cat.

                3. In that order.

                The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee does that) but to get the output of tail to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.



                Using sed (or awk, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.



                The sed solution that I propose is to




                1. 1h;d;, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.


                2. H, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.


                3. $G;p;, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.

                This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed and BSD sed is doing).




                If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:



                mkfifo mypipe
                cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS
                rm -f mypipe


                This uses tee to send the data down mypipe and at the same time to cat. The cat utility will first read the output from tail (which reads from mypipe, which tee is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee.



                There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee's writing to mypipe and cat would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat read from it. cat would not read from it until tail had finished. And tail would not finish until tee had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.



                The variation



                tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -


                has the same issue.






                share|improve this answer















                cat <<EOS | sed -ne '1h;d;' -e 'H;$G;p;'
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS


                The issue with translating this to something that uses tail is that tail needs to read the whole file to find the end of it. To use that in your pipeline, you need to



                1. Provide the full contents of the document to tail.

                2. Provide it again to cat.

                3. In that order.

                The tricky bit is not to duplicate the document's content (tee does that) but to get the output of tail to happen before the rest of the document is outputted, without using an intermediate temporary file.



                Using sed (or awk, as John1024 does) gets rid of the double parsing of the data and the ordering issue by storing the data in memory.



                The sed solution that I propose is to




                1. 1h;d;, store the first line in the hold space, as-is, and skip to the next line.


                2. H, append each other line to the hold space with an embedded newline.


                3. $G;p;, append the hold space to the last line with an embedded newline and print the resulting data.

                This is quite a literal translation of John1024's solution into sed, with the caveat that the POSIX standard only guarantees that the hold space is at lest 8192 bytes (8 KiB; but it recommends that this buffer is dynamically allocated and expanded as needed, which both GNU sed and BSD sed is doing).




                If you allow yourself to use a named pipe:



                mkfifo mypipe
                cat <<EOS | tee mypipe | cat <( tail -n 1 mypipe ) -
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS
                rm -f mypipe


                This uses tee to send the data down mypipe and at the same time to cat. The cat utility will first read the output from tail (which reads from mypipe, which tee is writing to), and then append the copy of the document coming directly from tee.



                There's a serious flaw in this though, in that if the document is too large (larger than the pipe's buffer size), tee's writing to mypipe and cat would block while waiting for the (unnamed) pipe to empty. It would not be emptied until cat read from it. cat would not read from it until tail had finished. And tail would not finish until tee had finished. This is a classic deadlock situation.



                The variation



                tee >( tail -n 1 >mypipe ) | cat mypipe -


                has the same issue.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 2 days ago

























                answered 2 days ago









                KusalanandaKusalananda

                139k17259430




                139k17259430







                • 2





                  The sed one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'). Also note that several sed implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.

                  – Stéphane Chazelas
                  2 days ago












                • The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?

                  – Jonah
                  yesterday












                • 2





                  The sed one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'). Also note that several sed implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.

                  – Stéphane Chazelas
                  2 days ago












                • The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?

                  – Jonah
                  yesterday







                2




                2





                The sed one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'). Also note that several sed implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.

                – Stéphane Chazelas
                2 days ago






                The sed one doesn't work if the input has only one line (maybe sed '1h;1!H;$!d;G'). Also note that several sed implementations have a low limit on the size of their pattern and hold space.

                – Stéphane Chazelas
                2 days ago














                The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?

                – Jonah
                yesterday





                The named pipe solution is the kind of thing i was looking for. The limitation is a shame. I understood your explanation except for “And tail would not finish until tee had finished” — could you elaborate on why that’s the case?

                – Jonah
                yesterday











                2














                There is a tool named pee in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).



                If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:



                cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat 
                line 1
                line 2
                line 3
                EOS


                Ordering of the commands run through pee is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.






                share|improve this answer



























                  2














                  There is a tool named pee in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).



                  If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:



                  cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat 
                  line 1
                  line 2
                  line 3
                  EOS


                  Ordering of the commands run through pee is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.






                  share|improve this answer

























                    2












                    2








                    2







                    There is a tool named pee in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).



                    If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:



                    cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat 
                    line 1
                    line 2
                    line 3
                    EOS


                    Ordering of the commands run through pee is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.






                    share|improve this answer













                    There is a tool named pee in a collection of command-line utilities usually packaged with the name "moreutils” (or otherwise retrievable from its home website).



                    If you can have it on your system then the equivalent for your example would be like:



                    cat <<EOS | pee 'tail -1' cat 
                    line 1
                    line 2
                    line 3
                    EOS


                    Ordering of the commands run through pee is important because they get executed in the sequence provided.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 2 days ago









                    LL3LL3

                    6217




                    6217





















                        1














                        Try:



                        cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
                        line 3
                        line 1
                        line 2
                        line 3
                        EOS


                        Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.



                        Now suppose line 3 comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline:



                        cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
                        $lastline
                        line 1
                        line 2
                        $lastline
                        EOS


                        In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:



                        cat <<EOS
                        this is template text
                        here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
                        EOS


                        We can interpolate multiple lines:



                        cat <<EOS
                        multi line
                        preamble
                        $(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
                        epilog
                        EOS


                        In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.






                        share|improve this answer




















                        • 1





                          I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The cat <<EOS... in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday












                        • @Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.

                          – Kaz
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday















                        1














                        Try:



                        cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
                        line 3
                        line 1
                        line 2
                        line 3
                        EOS


                        Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.



                        Now suppose line 3 comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline:



                        cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
                        $lastline
                        line 1
                        line 2
                        $lastline
                        EOS


                        In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:



                        cat <<EOS
                        this is template text
                        here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
                        EOS


                        We can interpolate multiple lines:



                        cat <<EOS
                        multi line
                        preamble
                        $(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
                        epilog
                        EOS


                        In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.






                        share|improve this answer




















                        • 1





                          I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The cat <<EOS... in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday












                        • @Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.

                          – Kaz
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday













                        1












                        1








                        1







                        Try:



                        cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
                        line 3
                        line 1
                        line 2
                        line 3
                        EOS


                        Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.



                        Now suppose line 3 comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline:



                        cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
                        $lastline
                        line 1
                        line 2
                        $lastline
                        EOS


                        In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:



                        cat <<EOS
                        this is template text
                        here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
                        EOS


                        We can interpolate multiple lines:



                        cat <<EOS
                        multi line
                        preamble
                        $(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
                        epilog
                        EOS


                        In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.






                        share|improve this answer















                        Try:



                        cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
                        line 3
                        line 1
                        line 2
                        line 3
                        EOS


                        Since the whole thing is literal data (a "here-is document"), and the difference between it and the desired output is trivial, just massage that literal data right there to match the output.



                        Now suppose line 3 comes from somewhere and is stored in a variable called lastline:



                        cat <<EOS # | what goes here now? Nothing!
                        $lastline
                        line 1
                        line 2
                        $lastline
                        EOS


                        In a here doc, we can generate text by substituting variables. Not only that but we can calculate text using command substitution:



                        cat <<EOS
                        this is template text
                        here we have a hex conversion: $(printf "%x" 42)
                        EOS


                        We can interpolate multiple lines:



                        cat <<EOS
                        multi line
                        preamble
                        $(for x in 3 1 2 3; do echo line $x ; done)
                        epilog
                        EOS


                        In general, avoid text processing the here doc template; try to generate it using interpolated code.







                        share|improve this answer














                        share|improve this answer



                        share|improve this answer








                        edited yesterday

























                        answered yesterday









                        KazKaz

                        4,73211733




                        4,73211733







                        • 1





                          I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The cat <<EOS... in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday












                        • @Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.

                          – Kaz
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday












                        • 1





                          I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The cat <<EOS... in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday












                        • @Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.

                          – Kaz
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        • 1





                          Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.

                          – Jonah
                          yesterday







                        1




                        1





                        I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The cat <<EOS... in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?

                        – Jonah
                        yesterday






                        I honestly can't tell if this is a joke or not. The cat <<EOS... in the OP was just an example standin for "catting an arbitrary file," to make the post specific and the question clear. Was that really not obvious to you, or did you just think it would be clever to interpret the question literally?

                        – Jonah
                        yesterday














                        @Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.

                        – Kaz
                        yesterday






                        @Jonah The question clearly says "[l]et's say that our input source, rather than being an actual file, was instead stdin:". Nothing about "arbitrary files"; it's about here docs. A here doc is not arbitrary. It's not an input to your program, but a piece of its syntax that the programmer chooses.

                        – Kaz
                        yesterday





                        1




                        1





                        I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.

                        – Jonah
                        yesterday






                        I think the context and existing answers made it clear that was the case, if only because for your interpretation to be correct you literally had to assume that neither I nor any of the other posters who replied realized that it was possible to copy and paste a line of code. Nevertheless, I will edit the question to make it explicit.

                        – Jonah
                        yesterday





                        1




                        1





                        Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.

                        – Jonah
                        yesterday






                        Kaz, thank you for the reply, but note even with your edit, you are missing the intention of the question. You are receiving arbitrary multiline input via a pipe. You have no idea what it will be. Your task is to output the last line of input, followed by the entire input.

                        – Jonah
                        yesterday





                        1




                        1





                        Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.

                        – Jonah
                        yesterday





                        Kaz, the input is there only as an example. Most people, including myself, find it helpful to have an example of real input and expected output, rather than only the abstract question. You are the only one who was confused by this.

                        – Jonah
                        yesterday











                        0














                        If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1).
                        As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.






                        share|improve this answer



























                          0














                          If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1).
                          As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.






                          share|improve this answer

























                            0












                            0








                            0







                            If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1).
                            As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.






                            share|improve this answer













                            If you don't care about the order. Then this will work cat lines | tee >(tail -1).
                            As others have said. You need to read file twice, or buffer the whole file, to do it in the order you asked for.







                            share|improve this answer












                            share|improve this answer



                            share|improve this answer










                            answered 2 days ago









                            ctrl-alt-delorctrl-alt-delor

                            12.2k42561




                            12.2k42561



























                                draft saved

                                draft discarded
















































                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509621%2fprepend-last-line-of-stdin-to-entire-stdin%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                                Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition

                                Marilyn Monroe Ny fiainany manokana | Jereo koa | Meny fitetezanafanitarana azy.