Mishloach Manot - why the word Mishloach is used specificallyPurim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavMishloach Manot must be “ready to eat” - from whose perspective?“Sending” mishloach manot by serving themIs “recycling” Mishloach Manot halachically acceptable?Why is “communal” mishloach manot allowed?To avoid bal tashchis, halachically, should people limit the quantity of “junk food” in mishloach manot?Can a shaliach assemble your mishloach manot for you?Can a shaliach buy food to give as mishloach manot?Giving mishloach manot/matanot la'evyonim to a non-JewMishloach Manot food to decor ratioMishloach Manot - why the word Manot is used specifically
Exposing a company lying about themselves in a tightly knit industry: Is my career at risk on the long run?
Are hand made posters acceptable in Academia?
label a part of commutative diagram
Gauss brackets with double vertical lines
How can a new country break out from a developed country without war?
UK Tourist Visa- Enquiry
PTIJ: Where did Achashverosh's years wander off to?
How to read string as hex number in bash?
How to determine the greatest d orbital splitting?
Help with identifying unique aircraft over NE Pennsylvania
Isn't the word "experience" wrongly used in this context?
Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions
How can an organ that provides biological immortality be unable to regenerate?
Why is this tree refusing to shed its dead leaves?
Would this string work as string?
What is the difference between something being completely legal and being completely decriminalized?
Why I don't get the wanted width of tcbox?
Imaginary part of expression too difficult to calculate
Hot air balloons as primitive bombers
What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?
Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to give it to him
Unfrosted light bulb
Air travel with refrigerated insulin
What will the Frenchman say?
Mishloach Manot - why the word Mishloach is used specifically
Purim and Shushan PurimParashat TzavMishloach Manot must be “ready to eat” - from whose perspective?“Sending” mishloach manot by serving themIs “recycling” Mishloach Manot halachically acceptable?Why is “communal” mishloach manot allowed?To avoid bal tashchis, halachically, should people limit the quantity of “junk food” in mishloach manot?Can a shaliach assemble your mishloach manot for you?Can a shaliach buy food to give as mishloach manot?Giving mishloach manot/matanot la'evyonim to a non-JewMishloach Manot food to decor ratioMishloach Manot - why the word Manot is used specifically
It appears that the Halacha does not emphasize the importance of actually "sending" the Manos, they can be handed or eaten in place.
Moreover, the word לשלח is used in the Torah as "to expel", e.g. Adam was expelled from Eden or a divorced woman is "expelled" from her husband and its usage here is strange.
Why in the Meggila the action of giving out Manos is called specifically Mishloach - does it have to be far away, does it have to be by a messenger or else?
Of course, this question is based on the assumption that the Sages chose the words very carefully, and every word hints on specific applications.
purim mishloach-manot
asked 14 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,0251529
add a comment |
It appears that the Halacha does not emphasize the importance of actually "sending" the Manos, they can be handed or eaten in place.
Moreover, the word לשלח is used in the Torah as "to expel", e.g. Adam was expelled from Eden or a divorced woman is "expelled" from her husband and its usage here is strange.
Why in the Meggila the action of giving out Manos is called specifically Mishloach - does it have to be far away, does it have to be by a messenger or else?
Of course, this question is based on the assumption that the Sages chose the words very carefully, and every word hints on specific applications.
purim mishloach-manot
asked 14 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,0251529
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
14 hours ago
add a comment |
It appears that the Halacha does not emphasize the importance of actually "sending" the Manos, they can be handed or eaten in place.
Moreover, the word לשלח is used in the Torah as "to expel", e.g. Adam was expelled from Eden or a divorced woman is "expelled" from her husband and its usage here is strange.
Why in the Meggila the action of giving out Manos is called specifically Mishloach - does it have to be far away, does it have to be by a messenger or else?
Of course, this question is based on the assumption that the Sages chose the words very carefully, and every word hints on specific applications.
purim mishloach-manot
asked 14 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,0251529
It appears that the Halacha does not emphasize the importance of actually "sending" the Manos, they can be handed or eaten in place.
Moreover, the word לשלח is used in the Torah as "to expel", e.g. Adam was expelled from Eden or a divorced woman is "expelled" from her husband and its usage here is strange.
Why in the Meggila the action of giving out Manos is called specifically Mishloach - does it have to be far away, does it have to be by a messenger or else?
Of course, this question is based on the assumption that the Sages chose the words very carefully, and every word hints on specific applications.
purim mishloach-manot
purim mishloach-manot
asked 14 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,0251529
asked 14 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,0251529
asked 14 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,0251529
asked 14 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,0251529
asked 14 hours ago
Al BerkoAl Berko
6,0251529
6,0251529
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
14 hours ago
add a comment |
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
14 hours ago
3
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
14 hours ago
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
14 hours ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited 13 hours ago
mbloch
26.5k545132
answered 14 hours ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited 13 hours ago
mbloch
26.5k545132
answered 14 hours ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
add a comment |
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited 13 hours ago
mbloch
26.5k545132
answered 14 hours ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
add a comment |
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited 13 hours ago
mbloch
26.5k545132
answered 14 hours ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
There is a teshuva of the Binyan Tzion which is often quoted about this issue, in Siman #44.
He explains that the language of שליחות is to indicate that the sending itself is enough, even if the recipient does not end up receiving or accepting the gift (as per the psak of the Rema, O.C. 695):
ולענ"ד טעם המהר"י ברין ורמ"א כמו שכתוב "ומשלוח מנות "
ולא כתיב "ונתון מנות " כמו דכתיב "ומתנות לאביונים ," דלשון
נתינה שייך גבי מנות כדכתיב "ונתן לפנינה וגו' מנות ולחנה יתן
מנה אחת אפים ," מזה נראה דלא הקפיד הכתוב אלא על
השילוח דהיינו שיוצא מן המשלח
He also adds on that we don't find any poskim who say that משלוח מנות specifically require sending, and personal delivery is sufficient, which he sees as support to his claim that the point of שליחות is to indicate that this is all that is required (as opposed to מתנות לאביונים, which he asserts requires the poor person to actually receive and accept it). He does, however, conclude that it may be better to send it via a messenger, though:
ומכ"מ אולי לכתחלה טוב יותר
לשלוח המנות ע"י אחר
edited 13 hours ago
mbloch
26.5k545132
answered 14 hours ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
edited 13 hours ago
mbloch
26.5k545132
edited 13 hours ago
mbloch
26.5k545132
edited 13 hours ago
mbloch
26.5k545132
26.5k545132
answered 14 hours ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
answered 14 hours ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
answered 14 hours ago
Y e zY e z
45.1k369201
45.1k369201
add a comment |
add a comment |
3
Your examples are all in Piel
– Double AA♦
14 hours ago