Output video to overscanning TV with Intel graphics2019 Community Moderator ElectionHD TV and Macbook Air with Linux see each other but screen is blackBlurry image between Radeon / DVI-to-HDMI / LG LCD monitorNeed to Adjust Screen Edge of an HDMI-connected TVMulti Head monitor with Intel HD Graphics - random black screenIntel HD 4600 graphics card not supported in Linux Mint 17Intel Graphics Driver for Kubuntu 14.10?Linux Mint Intel Integrated Graphics Not WorkingHow am I supposed to arrive at the conclusion that my video driver is called “intel”?xrandr shows disconnected DisplayPort with Intel Graphicsexternal monitor not detected after login

Recursively updating the MLE as new observations stream in

Homology of the fiber

Why does Surtur say that Thor is Asgard's doom?

Should I be concerned about student access to a test bank?

CLI: Get information Ubuntu releases

Jem'Hadar, something strange about their life expectancy

Is there any common country to visit for uk and schengen visa?

PTIJ: Which Dr. Seuss books should one obtain?

Determine voltage drop over 10G resistors with cheap multimeter

Extraneous elements in "Europe countries" list

Writing in a Christian voice

Should a narrator ever describe things based on a characters view instead of fact?

Nested Dynamic SOQL Query

Why I don't get the wanted width of tcbox?

10 year ban after applying for a UK student visa

Does the Shadow Magic sorcerer's Eyes of the Dark feature work on all Darkness spells or just his/her own?

Pre-Employment Background Check With Consent For Future Checks

Is a square zero matrix positive semidefinite?

How can I create URL shortcuts/redirects for task/diff IDs in Phabricator?

Can "few" be used as a subject? If so, what is the rule?

What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?

Do I need an EFI partition for each 18.04 ubuntu I have on my HD?

Why is indicated airspeed rather than ground speed used during the takeoff roll?

The English Debate



Output video to overscanning TV with Intel graphics



2019 Community Moderator ElectionHD TV and Macbook Air with Linux see each other but screen is blackBlurry image between Radeon / DVI-to-HDMI / LG LCD monitorNeed to Adjust Screen Edge of an HDMI-connected TVMulti Head monitor with Intel HD Graphics - random black screenIntel HD 4600 graphics card not supported in Linux Mint 17Intel Graphics Driver for Kubuntu 14.10?Linux Mint Intel Integrated Graphics Not WorkingHow am I supposed to arrive at the conclusion that my video driver is called “intel”?xrandr shows disconnected DisplayPort with Intel Graphicsexternal monitor not detected after login










2















I have a television which is 1366x768 resolution.

It is a JVC LT-32EM49.



When devices are connected to it, it lists the normal resolutions such as 480p, 720p, 1080p/i. But it does not list 1366x768.



The TV removes some pixels on the edges of the screen when using 720p or higher input. TVs that overscan are supposed to offer an option to disable this, but I am very confident that this TV does not allow the user to disable the overscanning. (Devices such as the PS3 seem to expect and work around this irrational behavior by not putting anything important directly on the edges of the screen. But with computers, the edges of the screen are more important.)



Now, when a computer was connected to this TV with a Radeon HD 4350 card (via DVI-HDMI adapter), Windows XP Professional SP3 listed 1366x768 as an available resolution (and it worked perfectly). I assume this was an OS-level workaround.

This same graphics card could be made to work properly (that is, having the full screen visible) with Linux via much fiddling with XRandR and --set.



However, I now wish to attach a Dell Studio Hybrid 140G (graphics card being Intel HD graphics, the GMA X3100 specifically) to this television. (The card has DVI and HDMI outputs)

And the Intel integrated graphics cards seem to have no such option to cope with problematic televisions and their relentless overscanning.



I have Googled much on this topic, to no avail. I suspect this post will appear as on the first page of such queries in the near future. xrandr --set overscan is not available for this graphics card, and --scale and --transform (the most widely touted solutions) do not fix the problem on this television.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 11 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • I ask this question in the full knowledge that both this graphics card and this television are both probably obsolete and unsupported both by the manufacturers and by all relevant communities. Please do not recommend upgrading any hardware as a "solution" to this problem.

    – JamesTheAwesomeDude
    Feb 10 '15 at 0:20
















2















I have a television which is 1366x768 resolution.

It is a JVC LT-32EM49.



When devices are connected to it, it lists the normal resolutions such as 480p, 720p, 1080p/i. But it does not list 1366x768.



The TV removes some pixels on the edges of the screen when using 720p or higher input. TVs that overscan are supposed to offer an option to disable this, but I am very confident that this TV does not allow the user to disable the overscanning. (Devices such as the PS3 seem to expect and work around this irrational behavior by not putting anything important directly on the edges of the screen. But with computers, the edges of the screen are more important.)



Now, when a computer was connected to this TV with a Radeon HD 4350 card (via DVI-HDMI adapter), Windows XP Professional SP3 listed 1366x768 as an available resolution (and it worked perfectly). I assume this was an OS-level workaround.

This same graphics card could be made to work properly (that is, having the full screen visible) with Linux via much fiddling with XRandR and --set.



However, I now wish to attach a Dell Studio Hybrid 140G (graphics card being Intel HD graphics, the GMA X3100 specifically) to this television. (The card has DVI and HDMI outputs)

And the Intel integrated graphics cards seem to have no such option to cope with problematic televisions and their relentless overscanning.



I have Googled much on this topic, to no avail. I suspect this post will appear as on the first page of such queries in the near future. xrandr --set overscan is not available for this graphics card, and --scale and --transform (the most widely touted solutions) do not fix the problem on this television.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 11 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • I ask this question in the full knowledge that both this graphics card and this television are both probably obsolete and unsupported both by the manufacturers and by all relevant communities. Please do not recommend upgrading any hardware as a "solution" to this problem.

    – JamesTheAwesomeDude
    Feb 10 '15 at 0:20














2












2








2


1






I have a television which is 1366x768 resolution.

It is a JVC LT-32EM49.



When devices are connected to it, it lists the normal resolutions such as 480p, 720p, 1080p/i. But it does not list 1366x768.



The TV removes some pixels on the edges of the screen when using 720p or higher input. TVs that overscan are supposed to offer an option to disable this, but I am very confident that this TV does not allow the user to disable the overscanning. (Devices such as the PS3 seem to expect and work around this irrational behavior by not putting anything important directly on the edges of the screen. But with computers, the edges of the screen are more important.)



Now, when a computer was connected to this TV with a Radeon HD 4350 card (via DVI-HDMI adapter), Windows XP Professional SP3 listed 1366x768 as an available resolution (and it worked perfectly). I assume this was an OS-level workaround.

This same graphics card could be made to work properly (that is, having the full screen visible) with Linux via much fiddling with XRandR and --set.



However, I now wish to attach a Dell Studio Hybrid 140G (graphics card being Intel HD graphics, the GMA X3100 specifically) to this television. (The card has DVI and HDMI outputs)

And the Intel integrated graphics cards seem to have no such option to cope with problematic televisions and their relentless overscanning.



I have Googled much on this topic, to no avail. I suspect this post will appear as on the first page of such queries in the near future. xrandr --set overscan is not available for this graphics card, and --scale and --transform (the most widely touted solutions) do not fix the problem on this television.










share|improve this question
















I have a television which is 1366x768 resolution.

It is a JVC LT-32EM49.



When devices are connected to it, it lists the normal resolutions such as 480p, 720p, 1080p/i. But it does not list 1366x768.



The TV removes some pixels on the edges of the screen when using 720p or higher input. TVs that overscan are supposed to offer an option to disable this, but I am very confident that this TV does not allow the user to disable the overscanning. (Devices such as the PS3 seem to expect and work around this irrational behavior by not putting anything important directly on the edges of the screen. But with computers, the edges of the screen are more important.)



Now, when a computer was connected to this TV with a Radeon HD 4350 card (via DVI-HDMI adapter), Windows XP Professional SP3 listed 1366x768 as an available resolution (and it worked perfectly). I assume this was an OS-level workaround.

This same graphics card could be made to work properly (that is, having the full screen visible) with Linux via much fiddling with XRandR and --set.



However, I now wish to attach a Dell Studio Hybrid 140G (graphics card being Intel HD graphics, the GMA X3100 specifically) to this television. (The card has DVI and HDMI outputs)

And the Intel integrated graphics cards seem to have no such option to cope with problematic televisions and their relentless overscanning.



I have Googled much on this topic, to no avail. I suspect this post will appear as on the first page of such queries in the near future. xrandr --set overscan is not available for this graphics card, and --scale and --transform (the most widely touted solutions) do not fix the problem on this television.







video intel-graphics






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 10 '15 at 17:11







JamesTheAwesomeDude

















asked Feb 10 '15 at 0:20









JamesTheAwesomeDudeJamesTheAwesomeDude

3222624




3222624





bumped to the homepage by Community 11 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 11 hours ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.














  • I ask this question in the full knowledge that both this graphics card and this television are both probably obsolete and unsupported both by the manufacturers and by all relevant communities. Please do not recommend upgrading any hardware as a "solution" to this problem.

    – JamesTheAwesomeDude
    Feb 10 '15 at 0:20


















  • I ask this question in the full knowledge that both this graphics card and this television are both probably obsolete and unsupported both by the manufacturers and by all relevant communities. Please do not recommend upgrading any hardware as a "solution" to this problem.

    – JamesTheAwesomeDude
    Feb 10 '15 at 0:20

















I ask this question in the full knowledge that both this graphics card and this television are both probably obsolete and unsupported both by the manufacturers and by all relevant communities. Please do not recommend upgrading any hardware as a "solution" to this problem.

– JamesTheAwesomeDude
Feb 10 '15 at 0:20






I ask this question in the full knowledge that both this graphics card and this television are both probably obsolete and unsupported both by the manufacturers and by all relevant communities. Please do not recommend upgrading any hardware as a "solution" to this problem.

– JamesTheAwesomeDude
Feb 10 '15 at 0:20











1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














I feel your pain. I fought with this same issue for quite a few hours before I decided to just start plugging different values and combinations of parameters into XRandR, and suddenly I was astonished to see that one of the commands I had previously entered without success had now produced the desired result! After some further fiddling, I managed to produce a repeatable scenario, which I will share with you:



$ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20
$ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --fb 1200x680 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20


These two lines are identical except that the second has the addition of the --fb 1200x680. The second line is the desired result, but it only worked when I entered it after entering the other line first - if I used the second line when coming from a "standard" configuration, I'd still have the cut-off bottom and right edges.



The -40 and -25 in the transform parameter pushes the entire picture down and to the right; the +40+20 on the end of the panning parameter adds padding to the bottom and right edges, and those numbers need to equal 1/2 of the difference between mode and fb.



(Note that my horizontal numbers are different: I needed 25 extra pixels on the left, but only 20 on the right. Regardless of your top and left margins in transform, you'll want to double your panning modifiers when determining the value for fb.)






share|improve this answer






















    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "106"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f183927%2foutput-video-to-overscanning-tv-with-intel-graphics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    I feel your pain. I fought with this same issue for quite a few hours before I decided to just start plugging different values and combinations of parameters into XRandR, and suddenly I was astonished to see that one of the commands I had previously entered without success had now produced the desired result! After some further fiddling, I managed to produce a repeatable scenario, which I will share with you:



    $ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20
    $ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --fb 1200x680 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20


    These two lines are identical except that the second has the addition of the --fb 1200x680. The second line is the desired result, but it only worked when I entered it after entering the other line first - if I used the second line when coming from a "standard" configuration, I'd still have the cut-off bottom and right edges.



    The -40 and -25 in the transform parameter pushes the entire picture down and to the right; the +40+20 on the end of the panning parameter adds padding to the bottom and right edges, and those numbers need to equal 1/2 of the difference between mode and fb.



    (Note that my horizontal numbers are different: I needed 25 extra pixels on the left, but only 20 on the right. Regardless of your top and left margins in transform, you'll want to double your panning modifiers when determining the value for fb.)






    share|improve this answer



























      0














      I feel your pain. I fought with this same issue for quite a few hours before I decided to just start plugging different values and combinations of parameters into XRandR, and suddenly I was astonished to see that one of the commands I had previously entered without success had now produced the desired result! After some further fiddling, I managed to produce a repeatable scenario, which I will share with you:



      $ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20
      $ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --fb 1200x680 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20


      These two lines are identical except that the second has the addition of the --fb 1200x680. The second line is the desired result, but it only worked when I entered it after entering the other line first - if I used the second line when coming from a "standard" configuration, I'd still have the cut-off bottom and right edges.



      The -40 and -25 in the transform parameter pushes the entire picture down and to the right; the +40+20 on the end of the panning parameter adds padding to the bottom and right edges, and those numbers need to equal 1/2 of the difference between mode and fb.



      (Note that my horizontal numbers are different: I needed 25 extra pixels on the left, but only 20 on the right. Regardless of your top and left margins in transform, you'll want to double your panning modifiers when determining the value for fb.)






      share|improve this answer

























        0












        0








        0







        I feel your pain. I fought with this same issue for quite a few hours before I decided to just start plugging different values and combinations of parameters into XRandR, and suddenly I was astonished to see that one of the commands I had previously entered without success had now produced the desired result! After some further fiddling, I managed to produce a repeatable scenario, which I will share with you:



        $ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20
        $ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --fb 1200x680 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20


        These two lines are identical except that the second has the addition of the --fb 1200x680. The second line is the desired result, but it only worked when I entered it after entering the other line first - if I used the second line when coming from a "standard" configuration, I'd still have the cut-off bottom and right edges.



        The -40 and -25 in the transform parameter pushes the entire picture down and to the right; the +40+20 on the end of the panning parameter adds padding to the bottom and right edges, and those numbers need to equal 1/2 of the difference between mode and fb.



        (Note that my horizontal numbers are different: I needed 25 extra pixels on the left, but only 20 on the right. Regardless of your top and left margins in transform, you'll want to double your panning modifiers when determining the value for fb.)






        share|improve this answer













        I feel your pain. I fought with this same issue for quite a few hours before I decided to just start plugging different values and combinations of parameters into XRandR, and suddenly I was astonished to see that one of the commands I had previously entered without success had now produced the desired result! After some further fiddling, I managed to produce a repeatable scenario, which I will share with you:



        $ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20
        $ xrandr --output HDMI-1 --mode 1280x720 --fb 1200x680 --transform 1,0,-40,0,1,-25,0,0,1 --panning 1280x720+40+20


        These two lines are identical except that the second has the addition of the --fb 1200x680. The second line is the desired result, but it only worked when I entered it after entering the other line first - if I used the second line when coming from a "standard" configuration, I'd still have the cut-off bottom and right edges.



        The -40 and -25 in the transform parameter pushes the entire picture down and to the right; the +40+20 on the end of the panning parameter adds padding to the bottom and right edges, and those numbers need to equal 1/2 of the difference between mode and fb.



        (Note that my horizontal numbers are different: I needed 25 extra pixels on the left, but only 20 on the right. Regardless of your top and left margins in transform, you'll want to double your panning modifiers when determining the value for fb.)







        share|improve this answer












        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer










        answered Sep 26 '18 at 17:05









        Dan HendersonDan Henderson

        1012




        1012



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f183927%2foutput-video-to-overscanning-tv-with-intel-graphics%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

            대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

            Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition