AIX 7.2 Topas show high CPUFile to access for CPU load average on AIXDiagnose high swap usage on AIXAIX cluster show swing filesystemsAIX CPU usage - how to know how many CPUs running?AIX: show video cardShow AIX operator panel statusCpu and memory utilization is high in AixAIX show package contentCalculate LPAR CPU utilization (AIX)sudo on AIX 7.2

Why no variance term in Bayesian logistic regression?

Is it inappropriate for a student to attend their mentor's dissertation defense?

Is it possible to create a QR code using text?

Avoiding the "not like other girls" trope?

A category-like structure without composition?

Why would the Red Woman birth a shadow if she worshipped the Lord of the Light?

How dangerous is XSS?

Can compressed videos be decoded back to their uncompresed original format?

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

How would I stat a creature to be immune to everything but the Magic Missile spell? (just for fun)

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

How do I handle a potential work/personal life conflict as the manager of one of my friends?

Am I breaking OOP practice with this architecture?

What method can I use to design a dungeon difficult enough that the PCs can't make it through without killing them?

Reverse dictionary where values are lists

Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?

Examples of smooth manifolds admitting inbetween one and a continuum of complex structures

Do UK voters know if their MP will be the Speaker of the House?

Is "remove commented out code" correct English?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

Venezuelan girlfriend wants to travel the USA to be with me. What is the process?

Is it acceptable for a professor to tell male students to not think that they are smarter than female students?

How can I deal with my CEO asking me to hire someone with a higher salary than me, a co-founder?

Why do bosons tend to occupy the same state?



AIX 7.2 Topas show high CPU


File to access for CPU load average on AIXDiagnose high swap usage on AIXAIX cluster show swing filesystemsAIX CPU usage - how to know how many CPUs running?AIX: show video cardShow AIX operator panel statusCpu and memory utilization is high in AixAIX show package contentCalculate LPAR CPU utilization (AIX)sudo on AIX 7.2













1















When I execute topas for a certain process, in the CPU% column it shows me 43% and jumping to 85%.



When I execute:



"ps aux | grep processName" 


The same process is at 5%.



What is more accurate? I also made a loop that similar to the Linux "watch" command, and I see it's at %5.



What's the difference between topas and ps, and who is right?



Output of ps:



[ttfai231:root]/root>ps aux | head -1; ps aux | sort -rn +2 | head -10
USER PID %CPU %MEM SZ RSS TTY STAT STIME TIME COMMAND
root 9306548 8.6 1.0 12880 12880 - A 13:35:33 41:20 MYDAEMON
root 1048868 2.0 0.0 448 448 - A 13:22:36 11:50 wait


Topas:
enter image description here










share|improve this question




























    1















    When I execute topas for a certain process, in the CPU% column it shows me 43% and jumping to 85%.



    When I execute:



    "ps aux | grep processName" 


    The same process is at 5%.



    What is more accurate? I also made a loop that similar to the Linux "watch" command, and I see it's at %5.



    What's the difference between topas and ps, and who is right?



    Output of ps:



    [ttfai231:root]/root>ps aux | head -1; ps aux | sort -rn +2 | head -10
    USER PID %CPU %MEM SZ RSS TTY STAT STIME TIME COMMAND
    root 9306548 8.6 1.0 12880 12880 - A 13:35:33 41:20 MYDAEMON
    root 1048868 2.0 0.0 448 448 - A 13:22:36 11:50 wait


    Topas:
    enter image description here










    share|improve this question


























      1












      1








      1


      1






      When I execute topas for a certain process, in the CPU% column it shows me 43% and jumping to 85%.



      When I execute:



      "ps aux | grep processName" 


      The same process is at 5%.



      What is more accurate? I also made a loop that similar to the Linux "watch" command, and I see it's at %5.



      What's the difference between topas and ps, and who is right?



      Output of ps:



      [ttfai231:root]/root>ps aux | head -1; ps aux | sort -rn +2 | head -10
      USER PID %CPU %MEM SZ RSS TTY STAT STIME TIME COMMAND
      root 9306548 8.6 1.0 12880 12880 - A 13:35:33 41:20 MYDAEMON
      root 1048868 2.0 0.0 448 448 - A 13:22:36 11:50 wait


      Topas:
      enter image description here










      share|improve this question
















      When I execute topas for a certain process, in the CPU% column it shows me 43% and jumping to 85%.



      When I execute:



      "ps aux | grep processName" 


      The same process is at 5%.



      What is more accurate? I also made a loop that similar to the Linux "watch" command, and I see it's at %5.



      What's the difference between topas and ps, and who is right?



      Output of ps:



      [ttfai231:root]/root>ps aux | head -1; ps aux | sort -rn +2 | head -10
      USER PID %CPU %MEM SZ RSS TTY STAT STIME TIME COMMAND
      root 9306548 8.6 1.0 12880 12880 - A 13:35:33 41:20 MYDAEMON
      root 1048868 2.0 0.0 448 448 - A 13:22:36 11:50 wait


      Topas:
      enter image description here







      cpu aix ps






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited yesterday









      Jeff Schaller

      44.6k1162144




      44.6k1162144










      asked 2 days ago









      ilanschilansch

      1581114




      1581114




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          0














          I believe this is a difference in how each field is computed. For the topas field:




          % CPU Utilization



          The average processor use of the process over the monitoring interval. The first time a process is shown, this value is the average processor use over the lifetime of the process.




          ... while the ps field:




          %CPU



          (u and v flags) The percentage of time the process has used the CPU since the process started. This value is computed by dividing the time the process uses the CPU by the elapsed time of the process. In a multi-processor environment, the value is further divided by the number of available CPUs because several threads in the same process can run on different CPUs at the same time. (Because the time base over which this data is computed varies, the sum of all %CPU fields can exceed 100%.)




          I've bolded the pieces of the description that highlight the difference.



          The topas CPU% value will fluctuate as the processes uses more or less CPU time, so it will show the CPU usage over the most recent (presumably short) interval; the ps %CPU value will always be shown as the average over the lifetime of the process.






          share|improve this answer























            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "106"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509929%2faix-7-2-topas-show-high-cpu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            0














            I believe this is a difference in how each field is computed. For the topas field:




            % CPU Utilization



            The average processor use of the process over the monitoring interval. The first time a process is shown, this value is the average processor use over the lifetime of the process.




            ... while the ps field:




            %CPU



            (u and v flags) The percentage of time the process has used the CPU since the process started. This value is computed by dividing the time the process uses the CPU by the elapsed time of the process. In a multi-processor environment, the value is further divided by the number of available CPUs because several threads in the same process can run on different CPUs at the same time. (Because the time base over which this data is computed varies, the sum of all %CPU fields can exceed 100%.)




            I've bolded the pieces of the description that highlight the difference.



            The topas CPU% value will fluctuate as the processes uses more or less CPU time, so it will show the CPU usage over the most recent (presumably short) interval; the ps %CPU value will always be shown as the average over the lifetime of the process.






            share|improve this answer



























              0














              I believe this is a difference in how each field is computed. For the topas field:




              % CPU Utilization



              The average processor use of the process over the monitoring interval. The first time a process is shown, this value is the average processor use over the lifetime of the process.




              ... while the ps field:




              %CPU



              (u and v flags) The percentage of time the process has used the CPU since the process started. This value is computed by dividing the time the process uses the CPU by the elapsed time of the process. In a multi-processor environment, the value is further divided by the number of available CPUs because several threads in the same process can run on different CPUs at the same time. (Because the time base over which this data is computed varies, the sum of all %CPU fields can exceed 100%.)




              I've bolded the pieces of the description that highlight the difference.



              The topas CPU% value will fluctuate as the processes uses more or less CPU time, so it will show the CPU usage over the most recent (presumably short) interval; the ps %CPU value will always be shown as the average over the lifetime of the process.






              share|improve this answer

























                0












                0








                0







                I believe this is a difference in how each field is computed. For the topas field:




                % CPU Utilization



                The average processor use of the process over the monitoring interval. The first time a process is shown, this value is the average processor use over the lifetime of the process.




                ... while the ps field:




                %CPU



                (u and v flags) The percentage of time the process has used the CPU since the process started. This value is computed by dividing the time the process uses the CPU by the elapsed time of the process. In a multi-processor environment, the value is further divided by the number of available CPUs because several threads in the same process can run on different CPUs at the same time. (Because the time base over which this data is computed varies, the sum of all %CPU fields can exceed 100%.)




                I've bolded the pieces of the description that highlight the difference.



                The topas CPU% value will fluctuate as the processes uses more or less CPU time, so it will show the CPU usage over the most recent (presumably short) interval; the ps %CPU value will always be shown as the average over the lifetime of the process.






                share|improve this answer













                I believe this is a difference in how each field is computed. For the topas field:




                % CPU Utilization



                The average processor use of the process over the monitoring interval. The first time a process is shown, this value is the average processor use over the lifetime of the process.




                ... while the ps field:




                %CPU



                (u and v flags) The percentage of time the process has used the CPU since the process started. This value is computed by dividing the time the process uses the CPU by the elapsed time of the process. In a multi-processor environment, the value is further divided by the number of available CPUs because several threads in the same process can run on different CPUs at the same time. (Because the time base over which this data is computed varies, the sum of all %CPU fields can exceed 100%.)




                I've bolded the pieces of the description that highlight the difference.



                The topas CPU% value will fluctuate as the processes uses more or less CPU time, so it will show the CPU usage over the most recent (presumably short) interval; the ps %CPU value will always be shown as the average over the lifetime of the process.







                share|improve this answer












                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer










                answered yesterday









                Jeff SchallerJeff Schaller

                44.6k1162144




                44.6k1162144



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f509929%2faix-7-2-topas-show-high-cpu%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                    NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

                    대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495