How is umask calculated in Linux?What is the first digit in umask value?Leading zero in umask 0022Why do some umask values not take effect?Umask not workingHow to check umask for all users under Linux?Umask for root and other system usersmount command permissions: ntfs vs. ntfs-3gHow umask worksWhat is the first digit in umask value?Leading zero in umask 0022How to permanently change umask value from 0002 to 0022?Setting umask for GNOME sessionWhy do some umask values not take effect?How do I make any newly created file in a specific directory executable, readable and writable by default by all users

How dangerous is XSS?

Is there a hemisphere-neutral way of specifying a season?

What are some good books on Machine Learning and AI like Krugman, Wells and Graddy's "Essentials of Economics"

One verb to replace 'be a member of' a club

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Intersection Puzzle

Should I tell management that I intend to leave due to bad software development practices?

What's the in-universe reasoning behind sorcerers needing material components?

How do I know where to place holes on an instrument?

In 'Revenger,' what does 'cove' come from?

What mechanic is there to disable a threat instead of killing it?

How to compactly explain secondary and tertiary characters without resorting to stereotypes?

Bullying boss launched a smear campaign and made me unemployable

How do I deal with an unproductive colleague in a small company?

What killed these X2 caps?

Is there an expression that means doing something right before you will need it rather than doing it in case you might need it?

How much of data wrangling is a data scientist's job?

How does a predictive coding aid in lossless compression?

CAST throwing error when run in stored procedure but not when run as raw query

How seriously should I take size and weight limits of hand luggage?

What is the most common color to indicate the input-field is disabled?

How do I handle a potential work/personal life conflict as the manager of one of my friends?

Can my sorcerer use a spellbook only to collect spells and scribe scrolls, not cast?

How to prevent "they're falling in love" trope



How is umask calculated in Linux?


What is the first digit in umask value?Leading zero in umask 0022Why do some umask values not take effect?Umask not workingHow to check umask for all users under Linux?Umask for root and other system usersmount command permissions: ntfs vs. ntfs-3gHow umask worksWhat is the first digit in umask value?Leading zero in umask 0022How to permanently change umask value from 0002 to 0022?Setting umask for GNOME sessionWhy do some umask values not take effect?How do I make any newly created file in a specific directory executable, readable and writable by default by all users













15















So I know umask can restrict privileged users, using this format umask ugo.



I understand that the read = 4, write = 2, and exec = 1. However, when I type umask, it returns 4 digits which is 0022 or 0073. I have no understanding of how does this work now because there is an extra digit. What is that extra digit and what does 0022 mean?










share|improve this question




























    15















    So I know umask can restrict privileged users, using this format umask ugo.



    I understand that the read = 4, write = 2, and exec = 1. However, when I type umask, it returns 4 digits which is 0022 or 0073. I have no understanding of how does this work now because there is an extra digit. What is that extra digit and what does 0022 mean?










    share|improve this question


























      15












      15








      15


      4






      So I know umask can restrict privileged users, using this format umask ugo.



      I understand that the read = 4, write = 2, and exec = 1. However, when I type umask, it returns 4 digits which is 0022 or 0073. I have no understanding of how does this work now because there is an extra digit. What is that extra digit and what does 0022 mean?










      share|improve this question
















      So I know umask can restrict privileged users, using this format umask ugo.



      I understand that the read = 4, write = 2, and exec = 1. However, when I type umask, it returns 4 digits which is 0022 or 0073. I have no understanding of how does this work now because there is an extra digit. What is that extra digit and what does 0022 mean?







      umask






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited Dec 31 '14 at 2:55









      muru

      37k589164




      37k589164










      asked Jul 27 '13 at 22:52









      BraiamBraiam

      23.8k2077142




      23.8k2077142




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          18














          Assume the default mask of 0666. umask 0022 would make the new mask 0644 (0666-0022=0644) meaning that group and others have read (no write or execute) permissions.



          The "extra" digit (the first number = 0), specifies that there are no special modes.



          If mode begins with a digit it will be interpreted as octal otherwise its meant to be symbolic.



          0 is a digit, as is 1 (for the sticky bit) or 6 (for SGID). A command such as chmod can be called by other methods, such as chmod ug+rw mydir where you would add the read and write permissions to user and group. Note that the mode in this case (ug+rw) does not begin with a digit, thus would not be interpretted as octal but rather symbolic.



          See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chmod#Symbolic_examples for symbolics as well as www.lifeaftercoffee.com/2007/03/20/special-permission-modes-in-linux-and-unix/ for a bit on special modes.



          I don't know that you would unmask the first bit with umask, but technically you could. It would explain why you almost always see it as a zero.



          Credit to pinkfloydx33



          The first digit of the mask deals with special permissions that don't fit quite so cleanly into the owner/group/other model. When four digits are provided for a file permission, the first refers to those special values:



          4000 = SUID
          2000 = SGID
          1000 = sticky bit


          The SUID bit, short for set-user-ID, causes an executable program to run with the effective user id (uid) of the owner -- in other words, no matter who executes it, the program executes with the owner's rights. This is commonly seen in programs that do things that require root privileges, but are meant to be run by normal users: passwd is one such example.



          The SGID bit, short for set-group-ID, is very similar, but runs with the effective group id (gid) of the owner.



          The sticky bit is a little more complicated, if you want more information on that, you can read the manpage for sticky.



          These bits can also be used with directories, but their meanings change.



          I don't believe you can actually set the umask to allow you to enable any of these extra bits by default, but you probably would never want to do that anyways.



          Credit to user470379






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Actually, you can't supply a non-zero value other than in the last 3 digits. According to Posix: "The interpretation of mode values that specify file mode bits other than the file permission bits is unspecified." According to man 2 umask (the corresponding system call) "only the file permission bits of mask are used". In bash, umask 1000 generates an error: "octal number out of range". So why the extra 0? I think it's just to show that the number is in octal.

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 1:29











          • that pastebin has no reference whatsoever to umask, so I don't see how it's relevant. chmod does allow the first three bits to be set, but umask doesn't allow them to be masked. (i.e. you could have written chmod 6777 dropbox. And, by the way, also chmod ug+s.)

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 2:17












          • Yeah, you are right, don't know what was I thinking.

            – Braiam
            Jul 28 '13 at 13:11











          • @Braiam: Your formula to calculate new mask is wrong, it's not 0666-0022, it's 0666 & ~0022.

            – cuonglm
            Dec 31 '14 at 1:44






          • 1





            I think the objection is not the way the numbers are written, but the use of the subtraction operator (-) instead of bitwise and (&).

            – BowlOfRed
            Dec 31 '14 at 3:11











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "106"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84676%2fhow-is-umask-calculated-in-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          18














          Assume the default mask of 0666. umask 0022 would make the new mask 0644 (0666-0022=0644) meaning that group and others have read (no write or execute) permissions.



          The "extra" digit (the first number = 0), specifies that there are no special modes.



          If mode begins with a digit it will be interpreted as octal otherwise its meant to be symbolic.



          0 is a digit, as is 1 (for the sticky bit) or 6 (for SGID). A command such as chmod can be called by other methods, such as chmod ug+rw mydir where you would add the read and write permissions to user and group. Note that the mode in this case (ug+rw) does not begin with a digit, thus would not be interpretted as octal but rather symbolic.



          See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chmod#Symbolic_examples for symbolics as well as www.lifeaftercoffee.com/2007/03/20/special-permission-modes-in-linux-and-unix/ for a bit on special modes.



          I don't know that you would unmask the first bit with umask, but technically you could. It would explain why you almost always see it as a zero.



          Credit to pinkfloydx33



          The first digit of the mask deals with special permissions that don't fit quite so cleanly into the owner/group/other model. When four digits are provided for a file permission, the first refers to those special values:



          4000 = SUID
          2000 = SGID
          1000 = sticky bit


          The SUID bit, short for set-user-ID, causes an executable program to run with the effective user id (uid) of the owner -- in other words, no matter who executes it, the program executes with the owner's rights. This is commonly seen in programs that do things that require root privileges, but are meant to be run by normal users: passwd is one such example.



          The SGID bit, short for set-group-ID, is very similar, but runs with the effective group id (gid) of the owner.



          The sticky bit is a little more complicated, if you want more information on that, you can read the manpage for sticky.



          These bits can also be used with directories, but their meanings change.



          I don't believe you can actually set the umask to allow you to enable any of these extra bits by default, but you probably would never want to do that anyways.



          Credit to user470379






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Actually, you can't supply a non-zero value other than in the last 3 digits. According to Posix: "The interpretation of mode values that specify file mode bits other than the file permission bits is unspecified." According to man 2 umask (the corresponding system call) "only the file permission bits of mask are used". In bash, umask 1000 generates an error: "octal number out of range". So why the extra 0? I think it's just to show that the number is in octal.

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 1:29











          • that pastebin has no reference whatsoever to umask, so I don't see how it's relevant. chmod does allow the first three bits to be set, but umask doesn't allow them to be masked. (i.e. you could have written chmod 6777 dropbox. And, by the way, also chmod ug+s.)

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 2:17












          • Yeah, you are right, don't know what was I thinking.

            – Braiam
            Jul 28 '13 at 13:11











          • @Braiam: Your formula to calculate new mask is wrong, it's not 0666-0022, it's 0666 & ~0022.

            – cuonglm
            Dec 31 '14 at 1:44






          • 1





            I think the objection is not the way the numbers are written, but the use of the subtraction operator (-) instead of bitwise and (&).

            – BowlOfRed
            Dec 31 '14 at 3:11















          18














          Assume the default mask of 0666. umask 0022 would make the new mask 0644 (0666-0022=0644) meaning that group and others have read (no write or execute) permissions.



          The "extra" digit (the first number = 0), specifies that there are no special modes.



          If mode begins with a digit it will be interpreted as octal otherwise its meant to be symbolic.



          0 is a digit, as is 1 (for the sticky bit) or 6 (for SGID). A command such as chmod can be called by other methods, such as chmod ug+rw mydir where you would add the read and write permissions to user and group. Note that the mode in this case (ug+rw) does not begin with a digit, thus would not be interpretted as octal but rather symbolic.



          See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chmod#Symbolic_examples for symbolics as well as www.lifeaftercoffee.com/2007/03/20/special-permission-modes-in-linux-and-unix/ for a bit on special modes.



          I don't know that you would unmask the first bit with umask, but technically you could. It would explain why you almost always see it as a zero.



          Credit to pinkfloydx33



          The first digit of the mask deals with special permissions that don't fit quite so cleanly into the owner/group/other model. When four digits are provided for a file permission, the first refers to those special values:



          4000 = SUID
          2000 = SGID
          1000 = sticky bit


          The SUID bit, short for set-user-ID, causes an executable program to run with the effective user id (uid) of the owner -- in other words, no matter who executes it, the program executes with the owner's rights. This is commonly seen in programs that do things that require root privileges, but are meant to be run by normal users: passwd is one such example.



          The SGID bit, short for set-group-ID, is very similar, but runs with the effective group id (gid) of the owner.



          The sticky bit is a little more complicated, if you want more information on that, you can read the manpage for sticky.



          These bits can also be used with directories, but their meanings change.



          I don't believe you can actually set the umask to allow you to enable any of these extra bits by default, but you probably would never want to do that anyways.



          Credit to user470379






          share|improve this answer




















          • 1





            Actually, you can't supply a non-zero value other than in the last 3 digits. According to Posix: "The interpretation of mode values that specify file mode bits other than the file permission bits is unspecified." According to man 2 umask (the corresponding system call) "only the file permission bits of mask are used". In bash, umask 1000 generates an error: "octal number out of range". So why the extra 0? I think it's just to show that the number is in octal.

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 1:29











          • that pastebin has no reference whatsoever to umask, so I don't see how it's relevant. chmod does allow the first three bits to be set, but umask doesn't allow them to be masked. (i.e. you could have written chmod 6777 dropbox. And, by the way, also chmod ug+s.)

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 2:17












          • Yeah, you are right, don't know what was I thinking.

            – Braiam
            Jul 28 '13 at 13:11











          • @Braiam: Your formula to calculate new mask is wrong, it's not 0666-0022, it's 0666 & ~0022.

            – cuonglm
            Dec 31 '14 at 1:44






          • 1





            I think the objection is not the way the numbers are written, but the use of the subtraction operator (-) instead of bitwise and (&).

            – BowlOfRed
            Dec 31 '14 at 3:11













          18












          18








          18







          Assume the default mask of 0666. umask 0022 would make the new mask 0644 (0666-0022=0644) meaning that group and others have read (no write or execute) permissions.



          The "extra" digit (the first number = 0), specifies that there are no special modes.



          If mode begins with a digit it will be interpreted as octal otherwise its meant to be symbolic.



          0 is a digit, as is 1 (for the sticky bit) or 6 (for SGID). A command such as chmod can be called by other methods, such as chmod ug+rw mydir where you would add the read and write permissions to user and group. Note that the mode in this case (ug+rw) does not begin with a digit, thus would not be interpretted as octal but rather symbolic.



          See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chmod#Symbolic_examples for symbolics as well as www.lifeaftercoffee.com/2007/03/20/special-permission-modes-in-linux-and-unix/ for a bit on special modes.



          I don't know that you would unmask the first bit with umask, but technically you could. It would explain why you almost always see it as a zero.



          Credit to pinkfloydx33



          The first digit of the mask deals with special permissions that don't fit quite so cleanly into the owner/group/other model. When four digits are provided for a file permission, the first refers to those special values:



          4000 = SUID
          2000 = SGID
          1000 = sticky bit


          The SUID bit, short for set-user-ID, causes an executable program to run with the effective user id (uid) of the owner -- in other words, no matter who executes it, the program executes with the owner's rights. This is commonly seen in programs that do things that require root privileges, but are meant to be run by normal users: passwd is one such example.



          The SGID bit, short for set-group-ID, is very similar, but runs with the effective group id (gid) of the owner.



          The sticky bit is a little more complicated, if you want more information on that, you can read the manpage for sticky.



          These bits can also be used with directories, but their meanings change.



          I don't believe you can actually set the umask to allow you to enable any of these extra bits by default, but you probably would never want to do that anyways.



          Credit to user470379






          share|improve this answer















          Assume the default mask of 0666. umask 0022 would make the new mask 0644 (0666-0022=0644) meaning that group and others have read (no write or execute) permissions.



          The "extra" digit (the first number = 0), specifies that there are no special modes.



          If mode begins with a digit it will be interpreted as octal otherwise its meant to be symbolic.



          0 is a digit, as is 1 (for the sticky bit) or 6 (for SGID). A command such as chmod can be called by other methods, such as chmod ug+rw mydir where you would add the read and write permissions to user and group. Note that the mode in this case (ug+rw) does not begin with a digit, thus would not be interpretted as octal but rather symbolic.



          See en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chmod#Symbolic_examples for symbolics as well as www.lifeaftercoffee.com/2007/03/20/special-permission-modes-in-linux-and-unix/ for a bit on special modes.



          I don't know that you would unmask the first bit with umask, but technically you could. It would explain why you almost always see it as a zero.



          Credit to pinkfloydx33



          The first digit of the mask deals with special permissions that don't fit quite so cleanly into the owner/group/other model. When four digits are provided for a file permission, the first refers to those special values:



          4000 = SUID
          2000 = SGID
          1000 = sticky bit


          The SUID bit, short for set-user-ID, causes an executable program to run with the effective user id (uid) of the owner -- in other words, no matter who executes it, the program executes with the owner's rights. This is commonly seen in programs that do things that require root privileges, but are meant to be run by normal users: passwd is one such example.



          The SGID bit, short for set-group-ID, is very similar, but runs with the effective group id (gid) of the owner.



          The sticky bit is a little more complicated, if you want more information on that, you can read the manpage for sticky.



          These bits can also be used with directories, but their meanings change.



          I don't believe you can actually set the umask to allow you to enable any of these extra bits by default, but you probably would never want to do that anyways.



          Credit to user470379







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited May 23 '17 at 12:40









          Community

          1




          1










          answered Jul 27 '13 at 22:52









          BraiamBraiam

          23.8k2077142




          23.8k2077142







          • 1





            Actually, you can't supply a non-zero value other than in the last 3 digits. According to Posix: "The interpretation of mode values that specify file mode bits other than the file permission bits is unspecified." According to man 2 umask (the corresponding system call) "only the file permission bits of mask are used". In bash, umask 1000 generates an error: "octal number out of range". So why the extra 0? I think it's just to show that the number is in octal.

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 1:29











          • that pastebin has no reference whatsoever to umask, so I don't see how it's relevant. chmod does allow the first three bits to be set, but umask doesn't allow them to be masked. (i.e. you could have written chmod 6777 dropbox. And, by the way, also chmod ug+s.)

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 2:17












          • Yeah, you are right, don't know what was I thinking.

            – Braiam
            Jul 28 '13 at 13:11











          • @Braiam: Your formula to calculate new mask is wrong, it's not 0666-0022, it's 0666 & ~0022.

            – cuonglm
            Dec 31 '14 at 1:44






          • 1





            I think the objection is not the way the numbers are written, but the use of the subtraction operator (-) instead of bitwise and (&).

            – BowlOfRed
            Dec 31 '14 at 3:11












          • 1





            Actually, you can't supply a non-zero value other than in the last 3 digits. According to Posix: "The interpretation of mode values that specify file mode bits other than the file permission bits is unspecified." According to man 2 umask (the corresponding system call) "only the file permission bits of mask are used". In bash, umask 1000 generates an error: "octal number out of range". So why the extra 0? I think it's just to show that the number is in octal.

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 1:29











          • that pastebin has no reference whatsoever to umask, so I don't see how it's relevant. chmod does allow the first three bits to be set, but umask doesn't allow them to be masked. (i.e. you could have written chmod 6777 dropbox. And, by the way, also chmod ug+s.)

            – rici
            Jul 28 '13 at 2:17












          • Yeah, you are right, don't know what was I thinking.

            – Braiam
            Jul 28 '13 at 13:11











          • @Braiam: Your formula to calculate new mask is wrong, it's not 0666-0022, it's 0666 & ~0022.

            – cuonglm
            Dec 31 '14 at 1:44






          • 1





            I think the objection is not the way the numbers are written, but the use of the subtraction operator (-) instead of bitwise and (&).

            – BowlOfRed
            Dec 31 '14 at 3:11







          1




          1





          Actually, you can't supply a non-zero value other than in the last 3 digits. According to Posix: "The interpretation of mode values that specify file mode bits other than the file permission bits is unspecified." According to man 2 umask (the corresponding system call) "only the file permission bits of mask are used". In bash, umask 1000 generates an error: "octal number out of range". So why the extra 0? I think it's just to show that the number is in octal.

          – rici
          Jul 28 '13 at 1:29





          Actually, you can't supply a non-zero value other than in the last 3 digits. According to Posix: "The interpretation of mode values that specify file mode bits other than the file permission bits is unspecified." According to man 2 umask (the corresponding system call) "only the file permission bits of mask are used". In bash, umask 1000 generates an error: "octal number out of range". So why the extra 0? I think it's just to show that the number is in octal.

          – rici
          Jul 28 '13 at 1:29













          that pastebin has no reference whatsoever to umask, so I don't see how it's relevant. chmod does allow the first three bits to be set, but umask doesn't allow them to be masked. (i.e. you could have written chmod 6777 dropbox. And, by the way, also chmod ug+s.)

          – rici
          Jul 28 '13 at 2:17






          that pastebin has no reference whatsoever to umask, so I don't see how it's relevant. chmod does allow the first three bits to be set, but umask doesn't allow them to be masked. (i.e. you could have written chmod 6777 dropbox. And, by the way, also chmod ug+s.)

          – rici
          Jul 28 '13 at 2:17














          Yeah, you are right, don't know what was I thinking.

          – Braiam
          Jul 28 '13 at 13:11





          Yeah, you are right, don't know what was I thinking.

          – Braiam
          Jul 28 '13 at 13:11













          @Braiam: Your formula to calculate new mask is wrong, it's not 0666-0022, it's 0666 & ~0022.

          – cuonglm
          Dec 31 '14 at 1:44





          @Braiam: Your formula to calculate new mask is wrong, it's not 0666-0022, it's 0666 & ~0022.

          – cuonglm
          Dec 31 '14 at 1:44




          1




          1





          I think the objection is not the way the numbers are written, but the use of the subtraction operator (-) instead of bitwise and (&).

          – BowlOfRed
          Dec 31 '14 at 3:11





          I think the objection is not the way the numbers are written, but the use of the subtraction operator (-) instead of bitwise and (&).

          – BowlOfRed
          Dec 31 '14 at 3:11

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f84676%2fhow-is-umask-calculated-in-linux%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

          NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

          대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495