Basic combinations logic doubt in probability The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question

How are circuits which use complex ICs normally simulated?

What is the motivation for a law requiring 2 parties to consent for recording a conversation

Can a rogue use sneak attack with weapons that have the thrown property even if they are not thrown?

Am I thawing this London Broil safely?

Aging parents with no investments

Does the shape of a die affect the probability of a number being rolled?

Write faster on AT24C32

What do the Banks children have against barley water?

Why isn't airport relocation done gradually?

What is the meaning of the verb "bear" in this context?

Why do UK politicians seemingly ignore opinion polls on Brexit?

How can I autofill dates in Excel excluding Sunday?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

Why was M87 targetted for the Event Horizon Telescope instead of Sagittarius A*?

How to deal with fear of taking dependencies

Can someone be penalized for an "unlawful" act if no penalty is specified?

Are there incongruent pythagorean triangles with the same perimeter and same area?

How come people say “Would of”?

A poker game description that does not feel gimmicky

Identify boardgame from Big movie

Can a flute soloist sit?

Is three citations per paragraph excessive for undergraduate research paper?

Did Scotland spend $250,000 for the slogan "Welcome to Scotland"?

For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?



Basic combinations logic doubt in probability



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InProbability of picking three marbles in ordergetting an outcome x number of attemptsProbability of a certain outcomeProbability of drawing colored MarblesProbability with changing number of marblesExpected number o f draws with replacement to reach probability.Probability that the first marble was blue, given the second is blueGiven a bag of 3 red marbles, 5 black, and 8 green, what is the probability that?A bag contains contains 20 blue marbles, 20 green marbles, and 20 red marblesMarble probability without replacement question










3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 7 at 10:08










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:11
















3












$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 7 at 10:08










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:11














3












3








3


2



$begingroup$



"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$





"If $3$ students are chosen at random from a class with $6$ girls and $4$ boys, what is the probability that all $3$ students chosen will be girls?"



$left(dfrac610right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)$




So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?



"A bag holds $4$ red marbles, $5$ blue marbles, and $2$ green marbles. If $5$ marbles are selected one after another without replacement, what is the probability of drawing $2$ red marbles, $2$ blue marbles, and $1$ green marble?"



My answer: $left(dfrac411right)left(dfrac310right)left(dfrac59right)left(dfrac48right)left(dfrac27right)$



But the correct answer is $dfrac(_4C_2) cdot (_5C_2) cdot (_2C_1)_11C_5$ (where $C$ is a combination).



Why doesn't the logic from the first problem work here?



The draws are without replacement in all cases.







probability combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 7 at 15:22









Bladewood

337213




337213










asked Apr 7 at 9:34









LuckyLucky

295




295











  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 7 at 10:08










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:11

















  • $begingroup$
    Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
    $endgroup$
    – NoChance
    Apr 7 at 10:08










  • $begingroup$
    @NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:11
















$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Apr 7 at 10:08




$begingroup$
Is the drawing with/without replacement in both cases?
$endgroup$
– NoChance
Apr 7 at 10:08












$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
Apr 7 at 10:11





$begingroup$
@NoChance: without replacement for both cases.
$endgroup$
– Lucky
Apr 7 at 10:11











4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















7












$begingroup$

What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
$$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
$$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday


















5












$begingroup$


"So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday










  • $begingroup$
    You are very welcome.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    19 hours ago


















0












$begingroup$

The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



(6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 9:57











  • $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:02










  • $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago


















0












$begingroup$

The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
$$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













    Your Answer





    StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
    return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
    StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
    StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
    );
    );
    , "mathjax-editing");

    StackExchange.ready(function()
    var channelOptions =
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "69"
    ;
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
    createEditor();
    );

    else
    createEditor();

    );

    function createEditor()
    StackExchange.prepareEditor(
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: true,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: 10,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader:
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    ,
    noCode: true, onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    );



    );













    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function ()
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes








    4 Answers
    4






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    7












    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday















    7












    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday













    7












    7








    7





    $begingroup$

    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    What you calculated is the probability of selecting two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble in that order. However, if we select blue, green, red, red, blue, we still get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble.



    To correct your attempt, we must multiply by the number of orders in which we could get two red marbles, two blue marbles, and one green marble. Choose two of the five positions for the blue marbles and two of the remaining three positions for the green marbles. The only green marble must go in the remaining position. Then we obtain
    $$binom52binom32binom11left(frac411right)left(frac310right)left(frac59right)left(frac48right)left(frac27right) = frac2077$$



    Since we do not care about the order in which the marbles are selected, it is simpler to calculate the probability of selecting two of the four red marbles, two of the five blue marbles, and one of the two green marbles when we select five of the eleven marbles, which yields
    $$fracdbinom42dbinom52dbinom21dbinom115 = frac2077$$







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Apr 7 at 10:40









    N. F. TaussigN. F. Taussig

    45.2k103358




    45.2k103358







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Thank you for the explanation and especially for taking the time to correct my attempt, that really helps. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday











    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You are very welcome.
      $endgroup$
      – drhab
      19 hours ago















    5












    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$








    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You are very welcome.
      $endgroup$
      – drhab
      19 hours ago













    5












    5








    5





    $begingroup$


    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




    "So why can't we use that logic to answer this question?"




    Using the logic in the first question you actually calculate the probability of the event that "the first chosen student is a girl, the second is a girl and the third is a girl". This is exactly the same event as "all $3$ students chosen will be a girl".



    Using the logic in the second situation you similarly calculate the probabitility of the event that "the first chosen marble is red, the second is red, the third is blue, the fourth is blue and the fifth is green". This is definitely not the same event as "$2$ chosen marbles are red, $2$ are blue and $1$ is green".



    If that event occurs then it is not excluded that e.g. the first chosen marble is green (hence not red).



    You can make use of the method, but then must not forget that the answer found at first hand must be multiplied by the number of orders that are possible.







    share|cite|improve this answer














    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer








    edited 15 hours ago

























    answered Apr 7 at 10:36









    drhabdrhab

    104k545136




    104k545136







    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You are very welcome.
      $endgroup$
      – drhab
      19 hours ago












    • 1




      $begingroup$
      Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      yesterday










    • $begingroup$
      You are very welcome.
      $endgroup$
      – drhab
      19 hours ago







    1




    1




    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday




    $begingroup$
    Makes sense, thank you for taking the time to help me out with this. :) Really appreciate it. :)
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    yesterday












    $begingroup$
    You are very welcome.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    19 hours ago




    $begingroup$
    You are very welcome.
    $endgroup$
    – drhab
    19 hours ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 9:57











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 10:02










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago















    0












    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$












    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 9:57











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 10:02










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago













    0












    0








    0





    $begingroup$

    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$



    The first situation with the students is simpler than the second situation with the marbles because we are interested in only one kind of studens (namely girls). So we don't have to deal with different kinds of students.



    This gives the simpler answer for the students-question, which doesn' work for the marbles-question.



    We can apply the more general logic from the marbles-question to the students question and get as answer:



    (6C3) / (10C3) = (6 * 5 * 4) / (10 * 9 * 8)



    which is equal to the simpler formula you gave.







    share|cite|improve this answer












    share|cite|improve this answer



    share|cite|improve this answer










    answered Apr 7 at 9:44









    jflippjflipp

    3,7511711




    3,7511711











    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 9:57











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 10:02










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago
















    • $begingroup$
      so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 9:57











    • $begingroup$
      also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
      $endgroup$
      – Lucky
      Apr 7 at 10:02










    • $begingroup$
      @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
      $endgroup$
      – Ister
      2 days ago















    $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 9:57





    $begingroup$
    so do you mean that the first logic is only applicable when there are only 2 different types and it isn't applicable when there are more than 2? I mean, why exactly is it not applicable for the 2nd situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 9:57













    $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:02




    $begingroup$
    also, if you are able to write the first answer in terms of the second answer then surely it should be possible to write the 2nd answer in terms of the first answer as well? what are your thoughts on that?
    $endgroup$
    – Lucky
    Apr 7 at 10:02












    $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago




    $begingroup$
    @Lucky it's not about number of all options to choose from (genders/colours/whatever). It's about number of options that we want to get. As already explained in drhab's answer if you want to draw just one kind of elements (regardless how many kinds are there in the pool) there is no difference between ordered and unordered results
    $endgroup$
    – Ister
    2 days ago











    0












    $begingroup$

    The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
    $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
    Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



    Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$

















      0












      $begingroup$

      The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
      $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
      Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



      Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$















        0












        0








        0





        $begingroup$

        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        The first question solved in the second method looks as follows:
        $$frac6choose 310choose 3=frac6cdot 5cdot 410cdot 9cdot 8$$
        Interpretation: There are $6choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ girls out of $6$ and there are $10choose 3$ ways to choose $3$ students out of $10$, hence the probability is the ratio of number of favorable outcomes to the total number of possible outcomes.



        Now compare it with the answer of the second problem and try to interpret the selections.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered Apr 7 at 10:53









        farruhotafarruhota

        21.9k2942




        21.9k2942



























            draft saved

            draft discarded
















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid


            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

            Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3177997%2fbasic-combinations-logic-doubt-in-probability%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

            NetworkManager fails with “Could not find source connection”Trouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksHow can I be notified about state changes to a VPN adapterBacktrack 5 R3 - Refuses to connect to VPNFeed all traffic through OpenVPN for a specific network namespace onlyRun daemon on startup in Debian once openvpn connection establishedpfsense tcp connection between openvpn and lan is brokenInternet connection problem with web browsers onlyWhy does NetworkManager explicitly support tun/tap devices?Browser issues with VPNTwo IP addresses assigned to the same network card - OpenVPN issues?Cannot connect to WiFi with nmcli, although secrets are provided

            대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495