combinatorics - product rule: the number of ways to stack booksCombinatorics-how many ways to sort books on a shelfNumber of ways to put k identical books onto n shelves, if each shelf gets at least oneHow to solve for the amount of arrangements of books on a shelf?# of ways to place books on shelfCombinatorics and order booksHow many ways to arrange books on a bookshelf?In how many ways I can put books on a shelf when only colour mattersFind the number of ways for choosing 3 books from the shelfStacking math booksHow many ways can you arrange books in a shelf?
Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?
Is it possible to create light that imparts a greater proportion of its energy as momentum rather than heat?
Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering
Could gravitational lensing be used to protect a spaceship from a laser?
Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?
What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?
How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?
Memorizing the Keyboard
How to model explosives?
Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?
What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?
How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?
Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?
Why doesn't using multiple commands with a || or && conditional work?
Where does SFDX store details about scratch orgs?
Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?
Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?
Assassin's bullet with mercury
Brothers & sisters
Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert
If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?
How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?
How can I tell someone that I want to be his or her friend?
Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?
combinatorics - product rule: the number of ways to stack books
Combinatorics-how many ways to sort books on a shelfNumber of ways to put k identical books onto n shelves, if each shelf gets at least oneHow to solve for the amount of arrangements of books on a shelf?# of ways to place books on shelfCombinatorics and order booksHow many ways to arrange books on a bookshelf?In how many ways I can put books on a shelf when only colour mattersFind the number of ways for choosing 3 books from the shelfStacking math booksHow many ways can you arrange books in a shelf?
$begingroup$
I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).
The problem I have:
There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important
Solution for point (a):
we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?
For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Shortly, I'm confused.
combinatorics permutations combinations
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).
The problem I have:
There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important
Solution for point (a):
we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?
For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Shortly, I'm confused.
combinatorics permutations combinations
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).
The problem I have:
There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important
Solution for point (a):
we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?
For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Shortly, I'm confused.
combinatorics permutations combinations
$endgroup$
I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).
The problem I have:
There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important
Solution for point (a):
we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?
For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Shortly, I'm confused.
combinatorics permutations combinations
combinatorics permutations combinations
edited 2 days ago
Alexander Nikolin
asked 2 days ago
Alexander NikolinAlexander Nikolin
224
224
$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?
It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.
Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:
$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$
The number of orders is given by:
$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$
What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.
So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);
else
createEditor();
);
function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);
);
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171817%2fcombinatorics-product-rule-the-number-of-ways-to-stack-books%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?
It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.
Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?
It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.
Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?
It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.
Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.
$endgroup$
Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?
It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.
Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?
Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.
answered 2 days ago
ArthurArthur
122k7122210
122k7122210
$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
1
$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:
$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$
The number of orders is given by:
$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$
What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.
So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:
$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$
The number of orders is given by:
$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$
What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.
So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:
$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$
The number of orders is given by:
$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$
What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.
So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.
$endgroup$
If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:
$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$
The number of orders is given by:
$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$
What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.
So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.
answered 2 days ago
InterstellarProbeInterstellarProbe
3,154728
3,154728
$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
2
$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago
2
2
$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171817%2fcombinatorics-product-rule-the-number-of-ways-to-stack-books%23new-answer', 'question_page');
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function ()
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
);
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago