combinatorics - product rule: the number of ways to stack booksCombinatorics-how many ways to sort books on a shelfNumber of ways to put k identical books onto n shelves, if each shelf gets at least oneHow to solve for the amount of arrangements of books on a shelf?# of ways to place books on shelfCombinatorics and order booksHow many ways to arrange books on a bookshelf?In how many ways I can put books on a shelf when only colour mattersFind the number of ways for choosing 3 books from the shelfStacking math booksHow many ways can you arrange books in a shelf?

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

Is it possible to create light that imparts a greater proportion of its energy as momentum rather than heat?

Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering

Could gravitational lensing be used to protect a spaceship from a laser?

Were any external disk drives stacked vertically?

What is a clear way to write a bar that has an extra beat?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

Memorizing the Keyboard

How to model explosives?

Can a virus destroy the BIOS of a modern computer?

What reasons are there for a Capitalist to oppose a 100% inheritance tax?

How is it possible to have an ability score that is less than 3?

Why "Having chlorophyll without photosynthesis is actually very dangerous" and "like living with a bomb"?

Why doesn't using multiple commands with a || or && conditional work?

Where does SFDX store details about scratch orgs?

Why doesn't H₄O²⁺ exist?

Can I ask the recruiters in my resume to put the reason why I am rejected?

Assassin's bullet with mercury

Brothers & sisters

Forgetting the musical notes while performing in concert

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

How can I make my BBEG immortal short of making them a Lich or Vampire?

How can I tell someone that I want to be his or her friend?

Why do I get two different answers for this counting problem?



combinatorics - product rule: the number of ways to stack books


Combinatorics-how many ways to sort books on a shelfNumber of ways to put k identical books onto n shelves, if each shelf gets at least oneHow to solve for the amount of arrangements of books on a shelf?# of ways to place books on shelfCombinatorics and order booksHow many ways to arrange books on a bookshelf?In how many ways I can put books on a shelf when only colour mattersFind the number of ways for choosing 3 books from the shelfStacking math booksHow many ways can you arrange books in a shelf?













3












$begingroup$


I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).



The problem I have:




There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important




Solution for point (a):

we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.



Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?



For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?



Shortly, I'm confused.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago
















3












$begingroup$


I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).



The problem I have:




There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important




Solution for point (a):

we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.



Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?



For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?



Shortly, I'm confused.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).



The problem I have:




There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important




Solution for point (a):

we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.



Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?



For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?



Shortly, I'm confused.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




I have difficulty understanding what order means in this task (and in general).



The problem I have:




There are five books on the shelf. How many ways you can stack several
of them (a stack can also consist of one book) if (a) The order of
the books in the stack is not important (b) the order of the books in
the stack is important




Solution for point (a):

we have 5 places in the stack, the book may or may not be lying in it, we'll mark it as 0 and 1. Then, the number of all possible combinations of these $2^5$, and we still need to subtract one case when all zeros, so that $2^5 - 1$.



Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not? I tried to draw for a couple of cases, for example 01010 and 10100. Both these stacks have two books, if the order was not important, it would be one case, not two, right?



For point (b) the correct solution is through the sum of $5 + 5 * 4 + 5 * 4 * 3 + ... + 5!$, where each term is a number of ways to select n books out of 5. But how does it differ from the first one? Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?



Shortly, I'm confused.







combinatorics permutations combinations






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago







Alexander Nikolin

















asked 2 days ago









Alexander NikolinAlexander Nikolin

224




224











  • $begingroup$
    If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago

















  • $begingroup$
    If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago
















$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago





$begingroup$
If you want to find the number of stacks where order matters, then the number of subset permutations of a set is given by $$eGamma(n+1,1)$$ where $Gamma$ is the incomplete Gamma function. Plugging in 5 and subtracting for the empty set, you have: $$eGamma(6,1)-1 = 325$$ Wolframalpha
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$


Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago


















3












$begingroup$

If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago












Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171817%2fcombinatorics-product-rule-the-number-of-ways-to-stack-books%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$


Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago















3












$begingroup$


Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago













3












3








3





$begingroup$


Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




Does this solution take into account the order or not? If not, why not?




It does not. The reason is that the only thing you have taken into account here are which books to include in the stack. You've gone to each book in order, asked "Do I want this book to be in the stack or not?", gotten a yes / no answer, and that's it. There are $2^5$ different ways that this question round can go, one of those ways does not result in a stack, so there are $2^5 - 1$ different stacks you could make.




Why are there so many more cases here than in the first case? Haven't we considered all the possible combinations in (a)?




Yes, you considered all possible combinations, but not the fact that a stack could be ordered in many different ways. So while in (a), "a stack of all the books" only made for a single possibility, namely "a stack of all the books", this time there are $5! = 120$ different orders to stack those five books. And similarily for four, three or two books. This naturally leads to more possibilities.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









ArthurArthur

122k7122210




122k7122210











  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago
















  • $begingroup$
    So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
    $endgroup$
    – Arthur
    2 days ago















$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago




$begingroup$
So, in the first case, I answer the question of how many different possibilities I have to take a few books and put them in a stack, considering that they are different, and in the second case the same, but I have to consider the possibility to take the books in different order?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@AlexanterNikolin Yes, that's it.
$endgroup$
– Arthur
2 days ago











3












$begingroup$

If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago
















3












$begingroup$

If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$

If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



If order matters, then we want to find the number of orders of books in the stack. I am not sure what notation you are familiar with. I will use the binomial coefficient notation. So, depending on which notation you are familiar with:



$$dbinomnr = dfracn!r!(n-r)! = _nC_r = ^nC_r$$



The number of orders is given by:



$$sum_i=1^5 i!dbinom5i$$



What this means is that there are $dbinom51$ way of choosing one book, and $1!$ ways of permuting them. There are $dbinom52$ ways of choosing two books, and $2!$ ways of permuting them. Etc.



So, $1!dbinom51+2!dbinom52+3!dbinom53+4!dbinom54+5!dbinom55 = 325$.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 2 days ago









InterstellarProbeInterstellarProbe

3,154728




3,154728











  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago

















  • $begingroup$
    Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
    $endgroup$
    – Alexander Nikolin
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    $$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
    $endgroup$
    – InterstellarProbe
    2 days ago
















$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago




$begingroup$
Oh, well, that's a lot easier to think about. Perhaps I've confused myself with the way I approached the first point, it's harder to imagine. That is, in the first case we simply divide by the number of permutations (it is in the formula, like r!), and in the second case we multiply?
$endgroup$
– Alexander Nikolin
2 days ago




2




2




$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago





$begingroup$
$$dbinomnr = _nC_r$$ is the number of ways to choose $r$ distinct items from a set containing $n$ distinct items (order does not matter). $$_nP_r = dfracn!(n-r)!$$ is the number of ways of permuting $r$ items from a set containing $n$ items. It is the difference between combinations and permutations.
$endgroup$
– InterstellarProbe
2 days ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3171817%2fcombinatorics-product-rule-the-number-of-ways-to-stack-books%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Àrd-bhaile Cathair chruinne/Baile mòr cruinne | Artagailean ceangailte | Clàr-taice na seòladaireachd

Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition

대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495