Why do I get negative height?Negative sign of accelerationCan you help me solve a difficult kinematics problem?A ball is dropped from the roof of a building. How fast is it moving after 4.9 seconds? (Absolute value)Height of buildingKinematic Problem, two balls thrown down from building at different times, when will they meet and what distance will they hit at?Calculating initial velocities given trajectory parabolaMotion of tennis ball bouncingConceptually, why is acceleration due to gravity always negative?Does the acceleration due of gravity taken positive or negative matters?How to solve this projectile motion physics problem in a book I'm studying?

If human space travel is limited by the G force vulnerability, is there a way to counter G forces?

Is it possible to run Internet Explorer on OS X El Capitan?

Modeling an IP Address

I'm flying to France today and my passport expires in less than 2 months

Did Shadowfax go to Valinor?

What is the intuition behind short exact sequences of groups; in particular, what is the intuition behind group extensions?

Is it canonical bit space?

How to show the equivalence between the regularized regression and their constraint formulas using KKT

I Accidentally Deleted a Stock Terminal Theme

How can I fix/modify my tub/shower combo so the water comes out of the showerhead?

Took a trip to a parallel universe, need help deciphering

I would say: "You are another teacher", but she is a woman and I am a man

Memorizing the Keyboard

What to put in ESTA if staying in US for a few days before going on to Canada

Is it legal for company to use my work email to pretend I still work there?

How can saying a song's name be a copyright violation?

A reference to a well-known characterization of scattered compact spaces

Arrow those variables!

Can a rocket refuel on Mars from water?

How to take photos in burst mode, without vibration?

How do conventional missiles fly?

Why is it a bad idea to hire a hitman to eliminate most corrupt politicians?

Intersection of two sorted vectors in C++

What is the word for reserving something for yourself before others do?



Why do I get negative height?


Negative sign of accelerationCan you help me solve a difficult kinematics problem?A ball is dropped from the roof of a building. How fast is it moving after 4.9 seconds? (Absolute value)Height of buildingKinematic Problem, two balls thrown down from building at different times, when will they meet and what distance will they hit at?Calculating initial velocities given trajectory parabolaMotion of tennis ball bouncingConceptually, why is acceleration due to gravity always negative?Does the acceleration due of gravity taken positive or negative matters?How to solve this projectile motion physics problem in a book I'm studying?













5












$begingroup$


A baseball is thrown from the roof $50.1^circ$ above the horizontal. The initial velocity is $11.5 mathrmm/s$.



I'm trying to find how high the ball goes.
I choose positive direction upwards.



$$
H = frac12g v_0y^2
$$



But I get a negative answer since $g$ is negative. Is $g$ an absolute value when working with energy?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How did you come up with that equation?
    $endgroup$
    – JMac
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JMac I got it from: $K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – user644361
    2 days ago















5












$begingroup$


A baseball is thrown from the roof $50.1^circ$ above the horizontal. The initial velocity is $11.5 mathrmm/s$.



I'm trying to find how high the ball goes.
I choose positive direction upwards.



$$
H = frac12g v_0y^2
$$



But I get a negative answer since $g$ is negative. Is $g$ an absolute value when working with energy?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How did you come up with that equation?
    $endgroup$
    – JMac
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JMac I got it from: $K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – user644361
    2 days ago













5












5








5





$begingroup$


A baseball is thrown from the roof $50.1^circ$ above the horizontal. The initial velocity is $11.5 mathrmm/s$.



I'm trying to find how high the ball goes.
I choose positive direction upwards.



$$
H = frac12g v_0y^2
$$



But I get a negative answer since $g$ is negative. Is $g$ an absolute value when working with energy?










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




A baseball is thrown from the roof $50.1^circ$ above the horizontal. The initial velocity is $11.5 mathrmm/s$.



I'm trying to find how high the ball goes.
I choose positive direction upwards.



$$
H = frac12g v_0y^2
$$



But I get a negative answer since $g$ is negative. Is $g$ an absolute value when working with energy?







homework-and-exercises newtonian-mechanics energy-conservation coordinate-systems projectile






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 days ago









Qmechanic

107k121991237




107k121991237






New contributor




user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 2 days ago









user644361user644361

3014




3014




New contributor




user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






user644361 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How did you come up with that equation?
    $endgroup$
    – JMac
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JMac I got it from: $K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – user644361
    2 days ago












  • 3




    $begingroup$
    How did you come up with that equation?
    $endgroup$
    – JMac
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    @JMac I got it from: $K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2$.
    $endgroup$
    – user644361
    2 days ago







3




3




$begingroup$
How did you come up with that equation?
$endgroup$
– JMac
2 days ago




$begingroup$
How did you come up with that equation?
$endgroup$
– JMac
2 days ago












$begingroup$
@JMac I got it from: $K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2$.
$endgroup$
– user644361
2 days ago




$begingroup$
@JMac I got it from: $K_1 + U_1 = K_2 + U_2$.
$endgroup$
– user644361
2 days ago










5 Answers
5






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

$g$ is always positive. The negative sign you might usually see comes from defining down as negative, but the value of $g$ is always positive. This is why you don't ever see absolute value signs and why your equation is actually correct.



To add more detail, the value of $g$ is just the magnitude of acceleration due to gravity near Earth's surface. It is given by $$g=fracGMR^2$$
where $M$ and $R$ are the mass and radius of the earth respectively, and $G$ is a constant. All of these values are positive, so $g$ is also positive.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 9




    $begingroup$
    While I agree with this answer, I would like to point out that this is a result of convention (in particular the convention to define $g$ as above) and not a fundamental mathematical truth. If you were to define $g$ differently, you'd get a different answer. Of course this is always true, but it's important to point out here because there is a alternate definition of $g$ that makes enough sense to cause this question to be asked.
    $endgroup$
    – DreamConspiracy
    2 days ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    @DreamConspiracy I suppose this is true, if you no longer want to define $g$ to be the magnitude of the acceleration.
    $endgroup$
    – Aaron Stevens
    2 days ago










  • $begingroup$
    yes. The only reason I even mention this is because I have seen people do it this way (and in some cases it very well might be convenient), and that this is not necessarily wrong
    $endgroup$
    – DreamConspiracy
    2 days ago


















5












$begingroup$

$g$ should always be positive. It is the magnitude of the gravitational field strength. If you choose vertical up as positive $y$, then the gravitational field (a vector) will be $-ghatj$. The gravitational potential energy change within a small vertical range will be
$$Delta U_g=mgDelta y$$
where $g$ is reasonably constant within the $Delta y$ range. For example if a 2 kg object is moved near the surface of the earth from $y_a= 2$ m to $y_b= 3$ m,
$$Delta U_g=mg(y_b-y_a)=19.6~mathrmJ.$$
If it is moved from $y_b$ to $y_a$
$$Delta U_g=mg(y_a-y_b)=-19.6~mathrmJ.$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    4












    $begingroup$

    The first issue is that it's thrown at an angle.



    As the question seems to assumes no air friction, the part of the velocity we care about for the answer is its vertical component (11.5 x sin 50.1 = 8.82 m/s). The horizontal component says how far it will travel horizontally, which we aren't being asked about.



    So the question is the same as asking about a ball thrown vertically upward at 8.82 m/s.



    Next, we have to make a choice which direction we call "positive". That is a completely free choice.



    • If we call "up" the + direction , then the ball starts with positive velocity +8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as +), and has an acceleration in the negative direction, with acceleration -9.8 (because gravity acts in the downward direction we defined as -).

    • If we call "down" the + direction , then the ball starts with negative velocity -8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as -), and has an acceleration in the positive direction, with acceleration +9.8 (because gravity acts in the upward direction we defined as +).

    We can choose either of these, and the answer will be the same.



    If we define "up" as the positive direction, which is probably the usual way most people would do it, then the ball starts with a positive velocity, and experiences a constant acceleration (deceleration) in the negative direction. (See how we use positive and negative directions and +/-g?). The ball reaches its highest point when its velocity reaches zero, because after that it starts to move downward again in a negative direction. We want to know how far its travelled in that time.



    We can solve this using equations of motion, or energy - the answer will be the same. I'll show both methods.



    Using equations of motion



    There are different ways to write the equation when we know start velocity (v1 which is 8.82), end velocity (v2 which is zero), and acceleration (a which is -9.8), and want to know distance (s). One easy way is to work out the time (t) it takes:



    v2 = v1 + at



    => 0 = 8.82 + (-9.8) t



    => t = 8.82 / 9.8 = 0.9 seconds



    How far did it travel?



    s = (v1 + v2) t / 2



    s = (8.82 + 0) x 0.9 / 2



    s = 8.82 x 0.9 /2 = 3.969



    The ball travelled 3.969 metres upwards at its highest point.



    Using energy



    Initial K.E. is m.v12/2 = m.8.822/2 = 38.89 m



    Final K.E. = 0 (when the ball is at its highest point, all the K.E. has been transformed into P.E., and it has no vertical velocity.)



    The gain in P.E. by raising a ball of weight 'm' by height 'h' is mgh.



    But we don't have to consider directions of motion really. We only have to consider energy. It starts with some KE and ends with none. It starts with some PE and ends with a higher gravitational PE because its position is higher within a gravitational field (however it got there)



    => mgh = 38.89m



    => g.h = 38.89



    => 9.8.h = 38.89



    => h = 38.89 / 9.8 = 3.969



    Same answer - the ball rises by 3.969 metres at its highest point.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$




















      3












      $begingroup$

      I assume you got to this equation by setting the potential energy at the highest point $E_textpot=mgH$ equal to the vertical kinetic energy $E_textkin=fracmv_y^22$. In the formula for the potential energy, $g$ is to be taken positive, as otherwise this would yield a negative potential energy (which is possible, but not correct in this context).




      If you want to see that consistent, derive the formula for the potential energy yourself. In that case $F_textgrav=mg$ since you take $g$ to be negative, and we are only considering the $z$ component. Then, since for lifting something up we need to apply a force opposite the gravitational force, we have
      $$E_textpot = int_0^h -F_textgrav ds = int_0^h -mg,ds = left. -mgsright|_s=0^h = -mgh$$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        I just don't get it how you can willy-nilly change the direction of something in physics when you've defined a positive direction.
        $endgroup$
        – user644361
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        The formula doesn't have absolute value signs for g either, $|g|$
        $endgroup$
        – user644361
        2 days ago










      • $begingroup$
        @user644361 Which has higher potential energy, the ball at h=1m or the ball at h=10m?
        $endgroup$
        – PM 2Ring
        2 days ago






      • 5




        $begingroup$
        You don't change it willy-nilly. This is why you should know where formulas come from. If you look at the derivation of the $mgh$ formula, you see that $g$ is taken to be positive, as is usually convention.
        $endgroup$
        – noah
        2 days ago






      • 2




        $begingroup$
        The work done by a change in potential energy is $W = -Delta U$. Note the minus sign in that equation. You have another minus sign because weight acts in the negative $y$ direction, in your sign convention. You can't do mechanics by just picking equations at random from a textbook and hoping everything will work out right - you have to understand what you are doing.
        $endgroup$
        – alephzero
        2 days ago


















      2












      $begingroup$

      The signs work out correctly as long as you are careful.



      If an object accelerates at a constant acceleration $a$ over a distance $s$ then the work done on the object is force times distance. But we have $F=ma$, so the work done on the object is $mas$. So if $K_1$ and $K_2$ are the kinetic energy of the object at the start and at the end of the period, then



      $K_2-K_1=mas$



      In the case of ballistic motion in a vertical direction, $K_1=frac 1 2 mv^2$ where $v$ is the initial velocity of the object. If the object reaches a maximum height of $h$ then $K_2=0$ when $s=h$, so we have



      $-frac1 2 mv^2 = mah$



      Substituting $a=-g$ and we have



      $-frac1 2 mv^2 = -mgh \ Rightarrow h = frac v^2 2g $






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$













        Your Answer





        StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
        return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
        StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
        StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
        );
        );
        , "mathjax-editing");

        StackExchange.ready(function()
        var channelOptions =
        tags: "".split(" "),
        id: "151"
        ;
        initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

        StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
        // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
        if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
        StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
        createEditor();
        );

        else
        createEditor();

        );

        function createEditor()
        StackExchange.prepareEditor(
        heartbeatType: 'answer',
        autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
        convertImagesToLinks: false,
        noModals: true,
        showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
        reputationToPostImages: null,
        bindNavPrevention: true,
        postfix: "",
        imageUploader:
        brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
        contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
        allowUrls: true
        ,
        noCode: true, onDemand: true,
        discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
        ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
        );



        );






        user644361 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









        draft saved

        draft discarded


















        StackExchange.ready(
        function ()
        StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470068%2fwhy-do-i-get-negative-height%23new-answer', 'question_page');

        );

        Post as a guest















        Required, but never shown

























        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes








        5 Answers
        5






        active

        oldest

        votes









        active

        oldest

        votes






        active

        oldest

        votes









        17












        $begingroup$

        $g$ is always positive. The negative sign you might usually see comes from defining down as negative, but the value of $g$ is always positive. This is why you don't ever see absolute value signs and why your equation is actually correct.



        To add more detail, the value of $g$ is just the magnitude of acceleration due to gravity near Earth's surface. It is given by $$g=fracGMR^2$$
        where $M$ and $R$ are the mass and radius of the earth respectively, and $G$ is a constant. All of these values are positive, so $g$ is also positive.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 9




          $begingroup$
          While I agree with this answer, I would like to point out that this is a result of convention (in particular the convention to define $g$ as above) and not a fundamental mathematical truth. If you were to define $g$ differently, you'd get a different answer. Of course this is always true, but it's important to point out here because there is a alternate definition of $g$ that makes enough sense to cause this question to be asked.
          $endgroup$
          – DreamConspiracy
          2 days ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @DreamConspiracy I suppose this is true, if you no longer want to define $g$ to be the magnitude of the acceleration.
          $endgroup$
          – Aaron Stevens
          2 days ago










        • $begingroup$
          yes. The only reason I even mention this is because I have seen people do it this way (and in some cases it very well might be convenient), and that this is not necessarily wrong
          $endgroup$
          – DreamConspiracy
          2 days ago















        17












        $begingroup$

        $g$ is always positive. The negative sign you might usually see comes from defining down as negative, but the value of $g$ is always positive. This is why you don't ever see absolute value signs and why your equation is actually correct.



        To add more detail, the value of $g$ is just the magnitude of acceleration due to gravity near Earth's surface. It is given by $$g=fracGMR^2$$
        where $M$ and $R$ are the mass and radius of the earth respectively, and $G$ is a constant. All of these values are positive, so $g$ is also positive.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$








        • 9




          $begingroup$
          While I agree with this answer, I would like to point out that this is a result of convention (in particular the convention to define $g$ as above) and not a fundamental mathematical truth. If you were to define $g$ differently, you'd get a different answer. Of course this is always true, but it's important to point out here because there is a alternate definition of $g$ that makes enough sense to cause this question to be asked.
          $endgroup$
          – DreamConspiracy
          2 days ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @DreamConspiracy I suppose this is true, if you no longer want to define $g$ to be the magnitude of the acceleration.
          $endgroup$
          – Aaron Stevens
          2 days ago










        • $begingroup$
          yes. The only reason I even mention this is because I have seen people do it this way (and in some cases it very well might be convenient), and that this is not necessarily wrong
          $endgroup$
          – DreamConspiracy
          2 days ago













        17












        17








        17





        $begingroup$

        $g$ is always positive. The negative sign you might usually see comes from defining down as negative, but the value of $g$ is always positive. This is why you don't ever see absolute value signs and why your equation is actually correct.



        To add more detail, the value of $g$ is just the magnitude of acceleration due to gravity near Earth's surface. It is given by $$g=fracGMR^2$$
        where $M$ and $R$ are the mass and radius of the earth respectively, and $G$ is a constant. All of these values are positive, so $g$ is also positive.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$



        $g$ is always positive. The negative sign you might usually see comes from defining down as negative, but the value of $g$ is always positive. This is why you don't ever see absolute value signs and why your equation is actually correct.



        To add more detail, the value of $g$ is just the magnitude of acceleration due to gravity near Earth's surface. It is given by $$g=fracGMR^2$$
        where $M$ and $R$ are the mass and radius of the earth respectively, and $G$ is a constant. All of these values are positive, so $g$ is also positive.







        share|cite|improve this answer












        share|cite|improve this answer



        share|cite|improve this answer










        answered 2 days ago









        Aaron StevensAaron Stevens

        14.2k42252




        14.2k42252







        • 9




          $begingroup$
          While I agree with this answer, I would like to point out that this is a result of convention (in particular the convention to define $g$ as above) and not a fundamental mathematical truth. If you were to define $g$ differently, you'd get a different answer. Of course this is always true, but it's important to point out here because there is a alternate definition of $g$ that makes enough sense to cause this question to be asked.
          $endgroup$
          – DreamConspiracy
          2 days ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @DreamConspiracy I suppose this is true, if you no longer want to define $g$ to be the magnitude of the acceleration.
          $endgroup$
          – Aaron Stevens
          2 days ago










        • $begingroup$
          yes. The only reason I even mention this is because I have seen people do it this way (and in some cases it very well might be convenient), and that this is not necessarily wrong
          $endgroup$
          – DreamConspiracy
          2 days ago












        • 9




          $begingroup$
          While I agree with this answer, I would like to point out that this is a result of convention (in particular the convention to define $g$ as above) and not a fundamental mathematical truth. If you were to define $g$ differently, you'd get a different answer. Of course this is always true, but it's important to point out here because there is a alternate definition of $g$ that makes enough sense to cause this question to be asked.
          $endgroup$
          – DreamConspiracy
          2 days ago






        • 2




          $begingroup$
          @DreamConspiracy I suppose this is true, if you no longer want to define $g$ to be the magnitude of the acceleration.
          $endgroup$
          – Aaron Stevens
          2 days ago










        • $begingroup$
          yes. The only reason I even mention this is because I have seen people do it this way (and in some cases it very well might be convenient), and that this is not necessarily wrong
          $endgroup$
          – DreamConspiracy
          2 days ago







        9




        9




        $begingroup$
        While I agree with this answer, I would like to point out that this is a result of convention (in particular the convention to define $g$ as above) and not a fundamental mathematical truth. If you were to define $g$ differently, you'd get a different answer. Of course this is always true, but it's important to point out here because there is a alternate definition of $g$ that makes enough sense to cause this question to be asked.
        $endgroup$
        – DreamConspiracy
        2 days ago




        $begingroup$
        While I agree with this answer, I would like to point out that this is a result of convention (in particular the convention to define $g$ as above) and not a fundamental mathematical truth. If you were to define $g$ differently, you'd get a different answer. Of course this is always true, but it's important to point out here because there is a alternate definition of $g$ that makes enough sense to cause this question to be asked.
        $endgroup$
        – DreamConspiracy
        2 days ago




        2




        2




        $begingroup$
        @DreamConspiracy I suppose this is true, if you no longer want to define $g$ to be the magnitude of the acceleration.
        $endgroup$
        – Aaron Stevens
        2 days ago




        $begingroup$
        @DreamConspiracy I suppose this is true, if you no longer want to define $g$ to be the magnitude of the acceleration.
        $endgroup$
        – Aaron Stevens
        2 days ago












        $begingroup$
        yes. The only reason I even mention this is because I have seen people do it this way (and in some cases it very well might be convenient), and that this is not necessarily wrong
        $endgroup$
        – DreamConspiracy
        2 days ago




        $begingroup$
        yes. The only reason I even mention this is because I have seen people do it this way (and in some cases it very well might be convenient), and that this is not necessarily wrong
        $endgroup$
        – DreamConspiracy
        2 days ago











        5












        $begingroup$

        $g$ should always be positive. It is the magnitude of the gravitational field strength. If you choose vertical up as positive $y$, then the gravitational field (a vector) will be $-ghatj$. The gravitational potential energy change within a small vertical range will be
        $$Delta U_g=mgDelta y$$
        where $g$ is reasonably constant within the $Delta y$ range. For example if a 2 kg object is moved near the surface of the earth from $y_a= 2$ m to $y_b= 3$ m,
        $$Delta U_g=mg(y_b-y_a)=19.6~mathrmJ.$$
        If it is moved from $y_b$ to $y_a$
        $$Delta U_g=mg(y_a-y_b)=-19.6~mathrmJ.$$






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$

















          5












          $begingroup$

          $g$ should always be positive. It is the magnitude of the gravitational field strength. If you choose vertical up as positive $y$, then the gravitational field (a vector) will be $-ghatj$. The gravitational potential energy change within a small vertical range will be
          $$Delta U_g=mgDelta y$$
          where $g$ is reasonably constant within the $Delta y$ range. For example if a 2 kg object is moved near the surface of the earth from $y_a= 2$ m to $y_b= 3$ m,
          $$Delta U_g=mg(y_b-y_a)=19.6~mathrmJ.$$
          If it is moved from $y_b$ to $y_a$
          $$Delta U_g=mg(y_a-y_b)=-19.6~mathrmJ.$$






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$















            5












            5








            5





            $begingroup$

            $g$ should always be positive. It is the magnitude of the gravitational field strength. If you choose vertical up as positive $y$, then the gravitational field (a vector) will be $-ghatj$. The gravitational potential energy change within a small vertical range will be
            $$Delta U_g=mgDelta y$$
            where $g$ is reasonably constant within the $Delta y$ range. For example if a 2 kg object is moved near the surface of the earth from $y_a= 2$ m to $y_b= 3$ m,
            $$Delta U_g=mg(y_b-y_a)=19.6~mathrmJ.$$
            If it is moved from $y_b$ to $y_a$
            $$Delta U_g=mg(y_a-y_b)=-19.6~mathrmJ.$$






            share|cite|improve this answer









            $endgroup$



            $g$ should always be positive. It is the magnitude of the gravitational field strength. If you choose vertical up as positive $y$, then the gravitational field (a vector) will be $-ghatj$. The gravitational potential energy change within a small vertical range will be
            $$Delta U_g=mgDelta y$$
            where $g$ is reasonably constant within the $Delta y$ range. For example if a 2 kg object is moved near the surface of the earth from $y_a= 2$ m to $y_b= 3$ m,
            $$Delta U_g=mg(y_b-y_a)=19.6~mathrmJ.$$
            If it is moved from $y_b$ to $y_a$
            $$Delta U_g=mg(y_a-y_b)=-19.6~mathrmJ.$$







            share|cite|improve this answer












            share|cite|improve this answer



            share|cite|improve this answer










            answered 2 days ago









            Bill NBill N

            9,86912241




            9,86912241





















                4












                $begingroup$

                The first issue is that it's thrown at an angle.



                As the question seems to assumes no air friction, the part of the velocity we care about for the answer is its vertical component (11.5 x sin 50.1 = 8.82 m/s). The horizontal component says how far it will travel horizontally, which we aren't being asked about.



                So the question is the same as asking about a ball thrown vertically upward at 8.82 m/s.



                Next, we have to make a choice which direction we call "positive". That is a completely free choice.



                • If we call "up" the + direction , then the ball starts with positive velocity +8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as +), and has an acceleration in the negative direction, with acceleration -9.8 (because gravity acts in the downward direction we defined as -).

                • If we call "down" the + direction , then the ball starts with negative velocity -8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as -), and has an acceleration in the positive direction, with acceleration +9.8 (because gravity acts in the upward direction we defined as +).

                We can choose either of these, and the answer will be the same.



                If we define "up" as the positive direction, which is probably the usual way most people would do it, then the ball starts with a positive velocity, and experiences a constant acceleration (deceleration) in the negative direction. (See how we use positive and negative directions and +/-g?). The ball reaches its highest point when its velocity reaches zero, because after that it starts to move downward again in a negative direction. We want to know how far its travelled in that time.



                We can solve this using equations of motion, or energy - the answer will be the same. I'll show both methods.



                Using equations of motion



                There are different ways to write the equation when we know start velocity (v1 which is 8.82), end velocity (v2 which is zero), and acceleration (a which is -9.8), and want to know distance (s). One easy way is to work out the time (t) it takes:



                v2 = v1 + at



                => 0 = 8.82 + (-9.8) t



                => t = 8.82 / 9.8 = 0.9 seconds



                How far did it travel?



                s = (v1 + v2) t / 2



                s = (8.82 + 0) x 0.9 / 2



                s = 8.82 x 0.9 /2 = 3.969



                The ball travelled 3.969 metres upwards at its highest point.



                Using energy



                Initial K.E. is m.v12/2 = m.8.822/2 = 38.89 m



                Final K.E. = 0 (when the ball is at its highest point, all the K.E. has been transformed into P.E., and it has no vertical velocity.)



                The gain in P.E. by raising a ball of weight 'm' by height 'h' is mgh.



                But we don't have to consider directions of motion really. We only have to consider energy. It starts with some KE and ends with none. It starts with some PE and ends with a higher gravitational PE because its position is higher within a gravitational field (however it got there)



                => mgh = 38.89m



                => g.h = 38.89



                => 9.8.h = 38.89



                => h = 38.89 / 9.8 = 3.969



                Same answer - the ball rises by 3.969 metres at its highest point.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$

















                  4












                  $begingroup$

                  The first issue is that it's thrown at an angle.



                  As the question seems to assumes no air friction, the part of the velocity we care about for the answer is its vertical component (11.5 x sin 50.1 = 8.82 m/s). The horizontal component says how far it will travel horizontally, which we aren't being asked about.



                  So the question is the same as asking about a ball thrown vertically upward at 8.82 m/s.



                  Next, we have to make a choice which direction we call "positive". That is a completely free choice.



                  • If we call "up" the + direction , then the ball starts with positive velocity +8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as +), and has an acceleration in the negative direction, with acceleration -9.8 (because gravity acts in the downward direction we defined as -).

                  • If we call "down" the + direction , then the ball starts with negative velocity -8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as -), and has an acceleration in the positive direction, with acceleration +9.8 (because gravity acts in the upward direction we defined as +).

                  We can choose either of these, and the answer will be the same.



                  If we define "up" as the positive direction, which is probably the usual way most people would do it, then the ball starts with a positive velocity, and experiences a constant acceleration (deceleration) in the negative direction. (See how we use positive and negative directions and +/-g?). The ball reaches its highest point when its velocity reaches zero, because after that it starts to move downward again in a negative direction. We want to know how far its travelled in that time.



                  We can solve this using equations of motion, or energy - the answer will be the same. I'll show both methods.



                  Using equations of motion



                  There are different ways to write the equation when we know start velocity (v1 which is 8.82), end velocity (v2 which is zero), and acceleration (a which is -9.8), and want to know distance (s). One easy way is to work out the time (t) it takes:



                  v2 = v1 + at



                  => 0 = 8.82 + (-9.8) t



                  => t = 8.82 / 9.8 = 0.9 seconds



                  How far did it travel?



                  s = (v1 + v2) t / 2



                  s = (8.82 + 0) x 0.9 / 2



                  s = 8.82 x 0.9 /2 = 3.969



                  The ball travelled 3.969 metres upwards at its highest point.



                  Using energy



                  Initial K.E. is m.v12/2 = m.8.822/2 = 38.89 m



                  Final K.E. = 0 (when the ball is at its highest point, all the K.E. has been transformed into P.E., and it has no vertical velocity.)



                  The gain in P.E. by raising a ball of weight 'm' by height 'h' is mgh.



                  But we don't have to consider directions of motion really. We only have to consider energy. It starts with some KE and ends with none. It starts with some PE and ends with a higher gravitational PE because its position is higher within a gravitational field (however it got there)



                  => mgh = 38.89m



                  => g.h = 38.89



                  => 9.8.h = 38.89



                  => h = 38.89 / 9.8 = 3.969



                  Same answer - the ball rises by 3.969 metres at its highest point.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$















                    4












                    4








                    4





                    $begingroup$

                    The first issue is that it's thrown at an angle.



                    As the question seems to assumes no air friction, the part of the velocity we care about for the answer is its vertical component (11.5 x sin 50.1 = 8.82 m/s). The horizontal component says how far it will travel horizontally, which we aren't being asked about.



                    So the question is the same as asking about a ball thrown vertically upward at 8.82 m/s.



                    Next, we have to make a choice which direction we call "positive". That is a completely free choice.



                    • If we call "up" the + direction , then the ball starts with positive velocity +8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as +), and has an acceleration in the negative direction, with acceleration -9.8 (because gravity acts in the downward direction we defined as -).

                    • If we call "down" the + direction , then the ball starts with negative velocity -8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as -), and has an acceleration in the positive direction, with acceleration +9.8 (because gravity acts in the upward direction we defined as +).

                    We can choose either of these, and the answer will be the same.



                    If we define "up" as the positive direction, which is probably the usual way most people would do it, then the ball starts with a positive velocity, and experiences a constant acceleration (deceleration) in the negative direction. (See how we use positive and negative directions and +/-g?). The ball reaches its highest point when its velocity reaches zero, because after that it starts to move downward again in a negative direction. We want to know how far its travelled in that time.



                    We can solve this using equations of motion, or energy - the answer will be the same. I'll show both methods.



                    Using equations of motion



                    There are different ways to write the equation when we know start velocity (v1 which is 8.82), end velocity (v2 which is zero), and acceleration (a which is -9.8), and want to know distance (s). One easy way is to work out the time (t) it takes:



                    v2 = v1 + at



                    => 0 = 8.82 + (-9.8) t



                    => t = 8.82 / 9.8 = 0.9 seconds



                    How far did it travel?



                    s = (v1 + v2) t / 2



                    s = (8.82 + 0) x 0.9 / 2



                    s = 8.82 x 0.9 /2 = 3.969



                    The ball travelled 3.969 metres upwards at its highest point.



                    Using energy



                    Initial K.E. is m.v12/2 = m.8.822/2 = 38.89 m



                    Final K.E. = 0 (when the ball is at its highest point, all the K.E. has been transformed into P.E., and it has no vertical velocity.)



                    The gain in P.E. by raising a ball of weight 'm' by height 'h' is mgh.



                    But we don't have to consider directions of motion really. We only have to consider energy. It starts with some KE and ends with none. It starts with some PE and ends with a higher gravitational PE because its position is higher within a gravitational field (however it got there)



                    => mgh = 38.89m



                    => g.h = 38.89



                    => 9.8.h = 38.89



                    => h = 38.89 / 9.8 = 3.969



                    Same answer - the ball rises by 3.969 metres at its highest point.






                    share|cite|improve this answer











                    $endgroup$



                    The first issue is that it's thrown at an angle.



                    As the question seems to assumes no air friction, the part of the velocity we care about for the answer is its vertical component (11.5 x sin 50.1 = 8.82 m/s). The horizontal component says how far it will travel horizontally, which we aren't being asked about.



                    So the question is the same as asking about a ball thrown vertically upward at 8.82 m/s.



                    Next, we have to make a choice which direction we call "positive". That is a completely free choice.



                    • If we call "up" the + direction , then the ball starts with positive velocity +8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as +), and has an acceleration in the negative direction, with acceleration -9.8 (because gravity acts in the downward direction we defined as -).

                    • If we call "down" the + direction , then the ball starts with negative velocity -8.82 (because its initial velocity is in the direction we defined as -), and has an acceleration in the positive direction, with acceleration +9.8 (because gravity acts in the upward direction we defined as +).

                    We can choose either of these, and the answer will be the same.



                    If we define "up" as the positive direction, which is probably the usual way most people would do it, then the ball starts with a positive velocity, and experiences a constant acceleration (deceleration) in the negative direction. (See how we use positive and negative directions and +/-g?). The ball reaches its highest point when its velocity reaches zero, because after that it starts to move downward again in a negative direction. We want to know how far its travelled in that time.



                    We can solve this using equations of motion, or energy - the answer will be the same. I'll show both methods.



                    Using equations of motion



                    There are different ways to write the equation when we know start velocity (v1 which is 8.82), end velocity (v2 which is zero), and acceleration (a which is -9.8), and want to know distance (s). One easy way is to work out the time (t) it takes:



                    v2 = v1 + at



                    => 0 = 8.82 + (-9.8) t



                    => t = 8.82 / 9.8 = 0.9 seconds



                    How far did it travel?



                    s = (v1 + v2) t / 2



                    s = (8.82 + 0) x 0.9 / 2



                    s = 8.82 x 0.9 /2 = 3.969



                    The ball travelled 3.969 metres upwards at its highest point.



                    Using energy



                    Initial K.E. is m.v12/2 = m.8.822/2 = 38.89 m



                    Final K.E. = 0 (when the ball is at its highest point, all the K.E. has been transformed into P.E., and it has no vertical velocity.)



                    The gain in P.E. by raising a ball of weight 'm' by height 'h' is mgh.



                    But we don't have to consider directions of motion really. We only have to consider energy. It starts with some KE and ends with none. It starts with some PE and ends with a higher gravitational PE because its position is higher within a gravitational field (however it got there)



                    => mgh = 38.89m



                    => g.h = 38.89



                    => 9.8.h = 38.89



                    => h = 38.89 / 9.8 = 3.969



                    Same answer - the ball rises by 3.969 metres at its highest point.







                    share|cite|improve this answer














                    share|cite|improve this answer



                    share|cite|improve this answer








                    edited 2 days ago

























                    answered 2 days ago









                    StilezStilez

                    1,468413




                    1,468413





















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        I assume you got to this equation by setting the potential energy at the highest point $E_textpot=mgH$ equal to the vertical kinetic energy $E_textkin=fracmv_y^22$. In the formula for the potential energy, $g$ is to be taken positive, as otherwise this would yield a negative potential energy (which is possible, but not correct in this context).




                        If you want to see that consistent, derive the formula for the potential energy yourself. In that case $F_textgrav=mg$ since you take $g$ to be negative, and we are only considering the $z$ component. Then, since for lifting something up we need to apply a force opposite the gravitational force, we have
                        $$E_textpot = int_0^h -F_textgrav ds = int_0^h -mg,ds = left. -mgsright|_s=0^h = -mgh$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          I just don't get it how you can willy-nilly change the direction of something in physics when you've defined a positive direction.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user644361
                          2 days ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          The formula doesn't have absolute value signs for g either, $|g|$
                          $endgroup$
                          – user644361
                          2 days ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          @user644361 Which has higher potential energy, the ball at h=1m or the ball at h=10m?
                          $endgroup$
                          – PM 2Ring
                          2 days ago






                        • 5




                          $begingroup$
                          You don't change it willy-nilly. This is why you should know where formulas come from. If you look at the derivation of the $mgh$ formula, you see that $g$ is taken to be positive, as is usually convention.
                          $endgroup$
                          – noah
                          2 days ago






                        • 2




                          $begingroup$
                          The work done by a change in potential energy is $W = -Delta U$. Note the minus sign in that equation. You have another minus sign because weight acts in the negative $y$ direction, in your sign convention. You can't do mechanics by just picking equations at random from a textbook and hoping everything will work out right - you have to understand what you are doing.
                          $endgroup$
                          – alephzero
                          2 days ago















                        3












                        $begingroup$

                        I assume you got to this equation by setting the potential energy at the highest point $E_textpot=mgH$ equal to the vertical kinetic energy $E_textkin=fracmv_y^22$. In the formula for the potential energy, $g$ is to be taken positive, as otherwise this would yield a negative potential energy (which is possible, but not correct in this context).




                        If you want to see that consistent, derive the formula for the potential energy yourself. In that case $F_textgrav=mg$ since you take $g$ to be negative, and we are only considering the $z$ component. Then, since for lifting something up we need to apply a force opposite the gravitational force, we have
                        $$E_textpot = int_0^h -F_textgrav ds = int_0^h -mg,ds = left. -mgsright|_s=0^h = -mgh$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$












                        • $begingroup$
                          I just don't get it how you can willy-nilly change the direction of something in physics when you've defined a positive direction.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user644361
                          2 days ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          The formula doesn't have absolute value signs for g either, $|g|$
                          $endgroup$
                          – user644361
                          2 days ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          @user644361 Which has higher potential energy, the ball at h=1m or the ball at h=10m?
                          $endgroup$
                          – PM 2Ring
                          2 days ago






                        • 5




                          $begingroup$
                          You don't change it willy-nilly. This is why you should know where formulas come from. If you look at the derivation of the $mgh$ formula, you see that $g$ is taken to be positive, as is usually convention.
                          $endgroup$
                          – noah
                          2 days ago






                        • 2




                          $begingroup$
                          The work done by a change in potential energy is $W = -Delta U$. Note the minus sign in that equation. You have another minus sign because weight acts in the negative $y$ direction, in your sign convention. You can't do mechanics by just picking equations at random from a textbook and hoping everything will work out right - you have to understand what you are doing.
                          $endgroup$
                          – alephzero
                          2 days ago













                        3












                        3








                        3





                        $begingroup$

                        I assume you got to this equation by setting the potential energy at the highest point $E_textpot=mgH$ equal to the vertical kinetic energy $E_textkin=fracmv_y^22$. In the formula for the potential energy, $g$ is to be taken positive, as otherwise this would yield a negative potential energy (which is possible, but not correct in this context).




                        If you want to see that consistent, derive the formula for the potential energy yourself. In that case $F_textgrav=mg$ since you take $g$ to be negative, and we are only considering the $z$ component. Then, since for lifting something up we need to apply a force opposite the gravitational force, we have
                        $$E_textpot = int_0^h -F_textgrav ds = int_0^h -mg,ds = left. -mgsright|_s=0^h = -mgh$$






                        share|cite|improve this answer











                        $endgroup$



                        I assume you got to this equation by setting the potential energy at the highest point $E_textpot=mgH$ equal to the vertical kinetic energy $E_textkin=fracmv_y^22$. In the formula for the potential energy, $g$ is to be taken positive, as otherwise this would yield a negative potential energy (which is possible, but not correct in this context).




                        If you want to see that consistent, derive the formula for the potential energy yourself. In that case $F_textgrav=mg$ since you take $g$ to be negative, and we are only considering the $z$ component. Then, since for lifting something up we need to apply a force opposite the gravitational force, we have
                        $$E_textpot = int_0^h -F_textgrav ds = int_0^h -mg,ds = left. -mgsright|_s=0^h = -mgh$$







                        share|cite|improve this answer














                        share|cite|improve this answer



                        share|cite|improve this answer








                        edited 2 days ago

























                        answered 2 days ago









                        noahnoah

                        4,13311226




                        4,13311226











                        • $begingroup$
                          I just don't get it how you can willy-nilly change the direction of something in physics when you've defined a positive direction.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user644361
                          2 days ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          The formula doesn't have absolute value signs for g either, $|g|$
                          $endgroup$
                          – user644361
                          2 days ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          @user644361 Which has higher potential energy, the ball at h=1m or the ball at h=10m?
                          $endgroup$
                          – PM 2Ring
                          2 days ago






                        • 5




                          $begingroup$
                          You don't change it willy-nilly. This is why you should know where formulas come from. If you look at the derivation of the $mgh$ formula, you see that $g$ is taken to be positive, as is usually convention.
                          $endgroup$
                          – noah
                          2 days ago






                        • 2




                          $begingroup$
                          The work done by a change in potential energy is $W = -Delta U$. Note the minus sign in that equation. You have another minus sign because weight acts in the negative $y$ direction, in your sign convention. You can't do mechanics by just picking equations at random from a textbook and hoping everything will work out right - you have to understand what you are doing.
                          $endgroup$
                          – alephzero
                          2 days ago
















                        • $begingroup$
                          I just don't get it how you can willy-nilly change the direction of something in physics when you've defined a positive direction.
                          $endgroup$
                          – user644361
                          2 days ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          The formula doesn't have absolute value signs for g either, $|g|$
                          $endgroup$
                          – user644361
                          2 days ago










                        • $begingroup$
                          @user644361 Which has higher potential energy, the ball at h=1m or the ball at h=10m?
                          $endgroup$
                          – PM 2Ring
                          2 days ago






                        • 5




                          $begingroup$
                          You don't change it willy-nilly. This is why you should know where formulas come from. If you look at the derivation of the $mgh$ formula, you see that $g$ is taken to be positive, as is usually convention.
                          $endgroup$
                          – noah
                          2 days ago






                        • 2




                          $begingroup$
                          The work done by a change in potential energy is $W = -Delta U$. Note the minus sign in that equation. You have another minus sign because weight acts in the negative $y$ direction, in your sign convention. You can't do mechanics by just picking equations at random from a textbook and hoping everything will work out right - you have to understand what you are doing.
                          $endgroup$
                          – alephzero
                          2 days ago















                        $begingroup$
                        I just don't get it how you can willy-nilly change the direction of something in physics when you've defined a positive direction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user644361
                        2 days ago




                        $begingroup$
                        I just don't get it how you can willy-nilly change the direction of something in physics when you've defined a positive direction.
                        $endgroup$
                        – user644361
                        2 days ago












                        $begingroup$
                        The formula doesn't have absolute value signs for g either, $|g|$
                        $endgroup$
                        – user644361
                        2 days ago




                        $begingroup$
                        The formula doesn't have absolute value signs for g either, $|g|$
                        $endgroup$
                        – user644361
                        2 days ago












                        $begingroup$
                        @user644361 Which has higher potential energy, the ball at h=1m or the ball at h=10m?
                        $endgroup$
                        – PM 2Ring
                        2 days ago




                        $begingroup$
                        @user644361 Which has higher potential energy, the ball at h=1m or the ball at h=10m?
                        $endgroup$
                        – PM 2Ring
                        2 days ago




                        5




                        5




                        $begingroup$
                        You don't change it willy-nilly. This is why you should know where formulas come from. If you look at the derivation of the $mgh$ formula, you see that $g$ is taken to be positive, as is usually convention.
                        $endgroup$
                        – noah
                        2 days ago




                        $begingroup$
                        You don't change it willy-nilly. This is why you should know where formulas come from. If you look at the derivation of the $mgh$ formula, you see that $g$ is taken to be positive, as is usually convention.
                        $endgroup$
                        – noah
                        2 days ago




                        2




                        2




                        $begingroup$
                        The work done by a change in potential energy is $W = -Delta U$. Note the minus sign in that equation. You have another minus sign because weight acts in the negative $y$ direction, in your sign convention. You can't do mechanics by just picking equations at random from a textbook and hoping everything will work out right - you have to understand what you are doing.
                        $endgroup$
                        – alephzero
                        2 days ago




                        $begingroup$
                        The work done by a change in potential energy is $W = -Delta U$. Note the minus sign in that equation. You have another minus sign because weight acts in the negative $y$ direction, in your sign convention. You can't do mechanics by just picking equations at random from a textbook and hoping everything will work out right - you have to understand what you are doing.
                        $endgroup$
                        – alephzero
                        2 days ago











                        2












                        $begingroup$

                        The signs work out correctly as long as you are careful.



                        If an object accelerates at a constant acceleration $a$ over a distance $s$ then the work done on the object is force times distance. But we have $F=ma$, so the work done on the object is $mas$. So if $K_1$ and $K_2$ are the kinetic energy of the object at the start and at the end of the period, then



                        $K_2-K_1=mas$



                        In the case of ballistic motion in a vertical direction, $K_1=frac 1 2 mv^2$ where $v$ is the initial velocity of the object. If the object reaches a maximum height of $h$ then $K_2=0$ when $s=h$, so we have



                        $-frac1 2 mv^2 = mah$



                        Substituting $a=-g$ and we have



                        $-frac1 2 mv^2 = -mgh \ Rightarrow h = frac v^2 2g $






                        share|cite|improve this answer









                        $endgroup$

















                          2












                          $begingroup$

                          The signs work out correctly as long as you are careful.



                          If an object accelerates at a constant acceleration $a$ over a distance $s$ then the work done on the object is force times distance. But we have $F=ma$, so the work done on the object is $mas$. So if $K_1$ and $K_2$ are the kinetic energy of the object at the start and at the end of the period, then



                          $K_2-K_1=mas$



                          In the case of ballistic motion in a vertical direction, $K_1=frac 1 2 mv^2$ where $v$ is the initial velocity of the object. If the object reaches a maximum height of $h$ then $K_2=0$ when $s=h$, so we have



                          $-frac1 2 mv^2 = mah$



                          Substituting $a=-g$ and we have



                          $-frac1 2 mv^2 = -mgh \ Rightarrow h = frac v^2 2g $






                          share|cite|improve this answer









                          $endgroup$















                            2












                            2








                            2





                            $begingroup$

                            The signs work out correctly as long as you are careful.



                            If an object accelerates at a constant acceleration $a$ over a distance $s$ then the work done on the object is force times distance. But we have $F=ma$, so the work done on the object is $mas$. So if $K_1$ and $K_2$ are the kinetic energy of the object at the start and at the end of the period, then



                            $K_2-K_1=mas$



                            In the case of ballistic motion in a vertical direction, $K_1=frac 1 2 mv^2$ where $v$ is the initial velocity of the object. If the object reaches a maximum height of $h$ then $K_2=0$ when $s=h$, so we have



                            $-frac1 2 mv^2 = mah$



                            Substituting $a=-g$ and we have



                            $-frac1 2 mv^2 = -mgh \ Rightarrow h = frac v^2 2g $






                            share|cite|improve this answer









                            $endgroup$



                            The signs work out correctly as long as you are careful.



                            If an object accelerates at a constant acceleration $a$ over a distance $s$ then the work done on the object is force times distance. But we have $F=ma$, so the work done on the object is $mas$. So if $K_1$ and $K_2$ are the kinetic energy of the object at the start and at the end of the period, then



                            $K_2-K_1=mas$



                            In the case of ballistic motion in a vertical direction, $K_1=frac 1 2 mv^2$ where $v$ is the initial velocity of the object. If the object reaches a maximum height of $h$ then $K_2=0$ when $s=h$, so we have



                            $-frac1 2 mv^2 = mah$



                            Substituting $a=-g$ and we have



                            $-frac1 2 mv^2 = -mgh \ Rightarrow h = frac v^2 2g $







                            share|cite|improve this answer












                            share|cite|improve this answer



                            share|cite|improve this answer










                            answered 2 days ago









                            gandalf61gandalf61

                            52028




                            52028




















                                user644361 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.









                                draft saved

                                draft discarded


















                                user644361 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                                user644361 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.











                                user644361 is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.














                                Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                                • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                                But avoid


                                • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                                • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                                Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                                To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                                draft saved


                                draft discarded














                                StackExchange.ready(
                                function ()
                                StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f470068%2fwhy-do-i-get-negative-height%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                                );

                                Post as a guest















                                Required, but never shown





















































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown

































                                Required, but never shown














                                Required, but never shown












                                Required, but never shown







                                Required, but never shown







                                Popular posts from this blog

                                getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                                Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition

                                Marilyn Monroe Ny fiainany manokana | Jereo koa | Meny fitetezanafanitarana azy.