Explicitly parse JSON string vs JSON.deserialize The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection 2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsJSON and escaped double quoteParse nested JSONJSON parsing to Visualforce page difficultiesDefault values for Wrapper variables not setConvert date in JSON to Date from StringMethod does not exist or incorrect signature: void parse(String) from the type or_propertyJSONTestHow to parse JSON String through apexDeserializing/Parsing the JSON response to an Apex classJson2apex - Message consuming unrecognized propertyParse JSON using APEX provided JSON Methods

How do spell lists change if the party levels up without taking a long rest?

University's motivation for having tenure-track positions

What can I do if neighbor is blocking my solar panels intentionally?

Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?

Is it ok to offer lower paid work as a trial period before negotiating for a full-time job?

Are spiders unable to hurt humans, especially very small spiders?

What do I do when my TA workload is more than expected?

ELI5: Why do they say that Israel would have been the fourth country to land a spacecraft on the Moon and why do they call it low cost?

How do I design a circuit to convert a 100 mV and 50 Hz sine wave to a square wave?

Do ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN effectively differ, and is there a "canonical" specification of the naturals?

Homework question about an engine pulling a train

Python - Fishing Simulator

Student Loan from years ago pops up and is taking my salary

How to read αἱμύλιος or when to aspirate

Can the Right Ascension and Argument of Perigee of a spacecraft's orbit keep varying by themselves with time?

My body leaves; my core can stay

What is the role of 'For' here?

Am I ethically obligated to go into work on an off day if the reason is sudden?

Windows 10: How to Lock (not sleep) laptop on lid close?

Example of compact Riemannian manifold with only one geodesic.

What to do when moving next to a bird sanctuary with a loosely-domesticated cat?

How did the audience guess the pentatonic scale in Bobby McFerrin's presentation?

Do warforged have souls?

Deal with toxic manager when you can't quit



Explicitly parse JSON string vs JSON.deserialize



The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Question Collection
2019 Moderator Election Q&A - Questionnaire
2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsJSON and escaped double quoteParse nested JSONJSON parsing to Visualforce page difficultiesDefault values for Wrapper variables not setConvert date in JSON to Date from StringMethod does not exist or incorrect signature: void parse(String) from the type or_propertyJSONTestHow to parse JSON String through apexDeserializing/Parsing the JSON response to an Apex classJson2apex - Message consuming unrecognized propertyParse JSON using APEX provided JSON Methods



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








1















The JSON2Apex web tool offers 2 methods of parsing of the JSON string: one uses JSON.deserialize method, and the other creates parser and iterates over the input json. The second option can be enabled by checking "Create explicit parse code" in the tool.



QUESTION



In what cases would a developer prefer explicit parsing to a simple JSON.deserialize? If we compare both options the later seems to be much clear and less verbose which makes code more readable.



Explicit parsing



public class JSON2Apex 

public class User
public String name get;set;
public String twitter get;set;

public User(JSONParser parser)
while (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.END_OBJECT)
if (parser.getCurrentToken() == System.JSONToken.FIELD_NAME)
String text = parser.getText();
if (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.VALUE_NULL)
if (text == 'name')
name = parser.getText();
else if (text == 'twitter')
twitter = parser.getText();
else
System.debug(LoggingLevel.WARN, 'User consuming unrecognized property: '+text);
consumeObject(parser);







public User user get;set;

public JSON2Apex(JSONParser parser)
while (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.END_OBJECT)
if (parser.getCurrentToken() == System.JSONToken.FIELD_NAME)
String text = parser.getText();
if (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.VALUE_NULL)
if (text == 'user')
user = new User(parser);
else
System.debug(LoggingLevel.WARN, 'JSON2Apex consuming unrecognized property: '+text);
consumeObject(parser);







public static JSON2Apex parse(String json)
System.JSONParser parser = System.JSON.createParser(json);
return new JSON2Apex(parser);


public static void consumeObject(System.JSONParser parser)
Integer depth = 0;
do
curr == System.JSONToken.END_ARRAY)
depth--;

while (depth > 0 && parser.nextToken() != null);








JSON.deserialize



public class JSON2Apex 

public class User
public String name;
public String twitter;


public User user;


public static JSON2Apex parse(String json)
return (JSON2Apex) System.JSON.deserialize(json, JSON2Apex.class);











share|improve this question




























    1















    The JSON2Apex web tool offers 2 methods of parsing of the JSON string: one uses JSON.deserialize method, and the other creates parser and iterates over the input json. The second option can be enabled by checking "Create explicit parse code" in the tool.



    QUESTION



    In what cases would a developer prefer explicit parsing to a simple JSON.deserialize? If we compare both options the later seems to be much clear and less verbose which makes code more readable.



    Explicit parsing



    public class JSON2Apex 

    public class User
    public String name get;set;
    public String twitter get;set;

    public User(JSONParser parser)
    while (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.END_OBJECT)
    if (parser.getCurrentToken() == System.JSONToken.FIELD_NAME)
    String text = parser.getText();
    if (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.VALUE_NULL)
    if (text == 'name')
    name = parser.getText();
    else if (text == 'twitter')
    twitter = parser.getText();
    else
    System.debug(LoggingLevel.WARN, 'User consuming unrecognized property: '+text);
    consumeObject(parser);







    public User user get;set;

    public JSON2Apex(JSONParser parser)
    while (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.END_OBJECT)
    if (parser.getCurrentToken() == System.JSONToken.FIELD_NAME)
    String text = parser.getText();
    if (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.VALUE_NULL)
    if (text == 'user')
    user = new User(parser);
    else
    System.debug(LoggingLevel.WARN, 'JSON2Apex consuming unrecognized property: '+text);
    consumeObject(parser);







    public static JSON2Apex parse(String json)
    System.JSONParser parser = System.JSON.createParser(json);
    return new JSON2Apex(parser);


    public static void consumeObject(System.JSONParser parser)
    Integer depth = 0;
    do
    curr == System.JSONToken.END_ARRAY)
    depth--;

    while (depth > 0 && parser.nextToken() != null);








    JSON.deserialize



    public class JSON2Apex 

    public class User
    public String name;
    public String twitter;


    public User user;


    public static JSON2Apex parse(String json)
    return (JSON2Apex) System.JSON.deserialize(json, JSON2Apex.class);











    share|improve this question
























      1












      1








      1








      The JSON2Apex web tool offers 2 methods of parsing of the JSON string: one uses JSON.deserialize method, and the other creates parser and iterates over the input json. The second option can be enabled by checking "Create explicit parse code" in the tool.



      QUESTION



      In what cases would a developer prefer explicit parsing to a simple JSON.deserialize? If we compare both options the later seems to be much clear and less verbose which makes code more readable.



      Explicit parsing



      public class JSON2Apex 

      public class User
      public String name get;set;
      public String twitter get;set;

      public User(JSONParser parser)
      while (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.END_OBJECT)
      if (parser.getCurrentToken() == System.JSONToken.FIELD_NAME)
      String text = parser.getText();
      if (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.VALUE_NULL)
      if (text == 'name')
      name = parser.getText();
      else if (text == 'twitter')
      twitter = parser.getText();
      else
      System.debug(LoggingLevel.WARN, 'User consuming unrecognized property: '+text);
      consumeObject(parser);







      public User user get;set;

      public JSON2Apex(JSONParser parser)
      while (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.END_OBJECT)
      if (parser.getCurrentToken() == System.JSONToken.FIELD_NAME)
      String text = parser.getText();
      if (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.VALUE_NULL)
      if (text == 'user')
      user = new User(parser);
      else
      System.debug(LoggingLevel.WARN, 'JSON2Apex consuming unrecognized property: '+text);
      consumeObject(parser);







      public static JSON2Apex parse(String json)
      System.JSONParser parser = System.JSON.createParser(json);
      return new JSON2Apex(parser);


      public static void consumeObject(System.JSONParser parser)
      Integer depth = 0;
      do
      curr == System.JSONToken.END_ARRAY)
      depth--;

      while (depth > 0 && parser.nextToken() != null);








      JSON.deserialize



      public class JSON2Apex 

      public class User
      public String name;
      public String twitter;


      public User user;


      public static JSON2Apex parse(String json)
      return (JSON2Apex) System.JSON.deserialize(json, JSON2Apex.class);











      share|improve this question














      The JSON2Apex web tool offers 2 methods of parsing of the JSON string: one uses JSON.deserialize method, and the other creates parser and iterates over the input json. The second option can be enabled by checking "Create explicit parse code" in the tool.



      QUESTION



      In what cases would a developer prefer explicit parsing to a simple JSON.deserialize? If we compare both options the later seems to be much clear and less verbose which makes code more readable.



      Explicit parsing



      public class JSON2Apex 

      public class User
      public String name get;set;
      public String twitter get;set;

      public User(JSONParser parser)
      while (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.END_OBJECT)
      if (parser.getCurrentToken() == System.JSONToken.FIELD_NAME)
      String text = parser.getText();
      if (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.VALUE_NULL)
      if (text == 'name')
      name = parser.getText();
      else if (text == 'twitter')
      twitter = parser.getText();
      else
      System.debug(LoggingLevel.WARN, 'User consuming unrecognized property: '+text);
      consumeObject(parser);







      public User user get;set;

      public JSON2Apex(JSONParser parser)
      while (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.END_OBJECT)
      if (parser.getCurrentToken() == System.JSONToken.FIELD_NAME)
      String text = parser.getText();
      if (parser.nextToken() != System.JSONToken.VALUE_NULL)
      if (text == 'user')
      user = new User(parser);
      else
      System.debug(LoggingLevel.WARN, 'JSON2Apex consuming unrecognized property: '+text);
      consumeObject(parser);







      public static JSON2Apex parse(String json)
      System.JSONParser parser = System.JSON.createParser(json);
      return new JSON2Apex(parser);


      public static void consumeObject(System.JSONParser parser)
      Integer depth = 0;
      do
      curr == System.JSONToken.END_ARRAY)
      depth--;

      while (depth > 0 && parser.nextToken() != null);








      JSON.deserialize



      public class JSON2Apex 

      public class User
      public String name;
      public String twitter;


      public User user;


      public static JSON2Apex parse(String json)
      return (JSON2Apex) System.JSON.deserialize(json, JSON2Apex.class);








      json parsing






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked Apr 9 at 7:20









      EduardEduard

      1,9022723




      1,9022723




















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4














          Apex code has reserved names (keywords) and special variable rules (e.g. cannot start with a number, can't have __, etc) that you can't use in JSON objects. You don't want to use explicit mode if you can help it, because it has worse performance compared to JSON.deserialize, but it gets around compilation errors if you have a JSON string like:



           "title": "Writing JSON", "abstract": "A short document about how to use JSON." 


          This would compile to:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract;



          But abstract is a reserved keyword. You can't deploy this code to Salesforce. By changing the code:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract_x;



          The code can then compile, but you need explicit parsing in order to translate abstract in the JSON string to abstract_x in Apex.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your prompt answer! If this is the only reason why a developer would use explicit parsing, then I would definitely go with deserialize all the time. It's possible to keep a Map of reserved words and their substitutes, and perform replace in the input json string before parsing. This is exaclty how the ffhttp_JsonDeserializer.cls class works.

            – Eduard
            Apr 9 at 7:56






          • 1





            @Eduard Yes, there are better ways. JSON2Apex is a rather old utility, useful in most cases, but explicit mode wasn't the best idea. There's definitely better ways to do it.

            – sfdcfox
            Apr 9 at 7:59











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function()
          var channelOptions =
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "459"
          ;
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
          createEditor();
          );

          else
          createEditor();

          );

          function createEditor()
          StackExchange.prepareEditor(
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader:
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          ,
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          );



          );













          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257118%2fexplicitly-parse-json-string-vs-json-deserialize%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes








          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes









          4














          Apex code has reserved names (keywords) and special variable rules (e.g. cannot start with a number, can't have __, etc) that you can't use in JSON objects. You don't want to use explicit mode if you can help it, because it has worse performance compared to JSON.deserialize, but it gets around compilation errors if you have a JSON string like:



           "title": "Writing JSON", "abstract": "A short document about how to use JSON." 


          This would compile to:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract;



          But abstract is a reserved keyword. You can't deploy this code to Salesforce. By changing the code:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract_x;



          The code can then compile, but you need explicit parsing in order to translate abstract in the JSON string to abstract_x in Apex.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your prompt answer! If this is the only reason why a developer would use explicit parsing, then I would definitely go with deserialize all the time. It's possible to keep a Map of reserved words and their substitutes, and perform replace in the input json string before parsing. This is exaclty how the ffhttp_JsonDeserializer.cls class works.

            – Eduard
            Apr 9 at 7:56






          • 1





            @Eduard Yes, there are better ways. JSON2Apex is a rather old utility, useful in most cases, but explicit mode wasn't the best idea. There's definitely better ways to do it.

            – sfdcfox
            Apr 9 at 7:59















          4














          Apex code has reserved names (keywords) and special variable rules (e.g. cannot start with a number, can't have __, etc) that you can't use in JSON objects. You don't want to use explicit mode if you can help it, because it has worse performance compared to JSON.deserialize, but it gets around compilation errors if you have a JSON string like:



           "title": "Writing JSON", "abstract": "A short document about how to use JSON." 


          This would compile to:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract;



          But abstract is a reserved keyword. You can't deploy this code to Salesforce. By changing the code:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract_x;



          The code can then compile, but you need explicit parsing in order to translate abstract in the JSON string to abstract_x in Apex.






          share|improve this answer























          • Thanks for your prompt answer! If this is the only reason why a developer would use explicit parsing, then I would definitely go with deserialize all the time. It's possible to keep a Map of reserved words and their substitutes, and perform replace in the input json string before parsing. This is exaclty how the ffhttp_JsonDeserializer.cls class works.

            – Eduard
            Apr 9 at 7:56






          • 1





            @Eduard Yes, there are better ways. JSON2Apex is a rather old utility, useful in most cases, but explicit mode wasn't the best idea. There's definitely better ways to do it.

            – sfdcfox
            Apr 9 at 7:59













          4












          4








          4







          Apex code has reserved names (keywords) and special variable rules (e.g. cannot start with a number, can't have __, etc) that you can't use in JSON objects. You don't want to use explicit mode if you can help it, because it has worse performance compared to JSON.deserialize, but it gets around compilation errors if you have a JSON string like:



           "title": "Writing JSON", "abstract": "A short document about how to use JSON." 


          This would compile to:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract;



          But abstract is a reserved keyword. You can't deploy this code to Salesforce. By changing the code:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract_x;



          The code can then compile, but you need explicit parsing in order to translate abstract in the JSON string to abstract_x in Apex.






          share|improve this answer













          Apex code has reserved names (keywords) and special variable rules (e.g. cannot start with a number, can't have __, etc) that you can't use in JSON objects. You don't want to use explicit mode if you can help it, because it has worse performance compared to JSON.deserialize, but it gets around compilation errors if you have a JSON string like:



           "title": "Writing JSON", "abstract": "A short document about how to use JSON." 


          This would compile to:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract;



          But abstract is a reserved keyword. You can't deploy this code to Salesforce. By changing the code:



          public class JSON2Apex 
          public String title;
          public String abstract_x;



          The code can then compile, but you need explicit parsing in order to translate abstract in the JSON string to abstract_x in Apex.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Apr 9 at 7:38









          sfdcfoxsfdcfox

          265k13211458




          265k13211458












          • Thanks for your prompt answer! If this is the only reason why a developer would use explicit parsing, then I would definitely go with deserialize all the time. It's possible to keep a Map of reserved words and their substitutes, and perform replace in the input json string before parsing. This is exaclty how the ffhttp_JsonDeserializer.cls class works.

            – Eduard
            Apr 9 at 7:56






          • 1





            @Eduard Yes, there are better ways. JSON2Apex is a rather old utility, useful in most cases, but explicit mode wasn't the best idea. There's definitely better ways to do it.

            – sfdcfox
            Apr 9 at 7:59

















          • Thanks for your prompt answer! If this is the only reason why a developer would use explicit parsing, then I would definitely go with deserialize all the time. It's possible to keep a Map of reserved words and their substitutes, and perform replace in the input json string before parsing. This is exaclty how the ffhttp_JsonDeserializer.cls class works.

            – Eduard
            Apr 9 at 7:56






          • 1





            @Eduard Yes, there are better ways. JSON2Apex is a rather old utility, useful in most cases, but explicit mode wasn't the best idea. There's definitely better ways to do it.

            – sfdcfox
            Apr 9 at 7:59
















          Thanks for your prompt answer! If this is the only reason why a developer would use explicit parsing, then I would definitely go with deserialize all the time. It's possible to keep a Map of reserved words and their substitutes, and perform replace in the input json string before parsing. This is exaclty how the ffhttp_JsonDeserializer.cls class works.

          – Eduard
          Apr 9 at 7:56





          Thanks for your prompt answer! If this is the only reason why a developer would use explicit parsing, then I would definitely go with deserialize all the time. It's possible to keep a Map of reserved words and their substitutes, and perform replace in the input json string before parsing. This is exaclty how the ffhttp_JsonDeserializer.cls class works.

          – Eduard
          Apr 9 at 7:56




          1




          1





          @Eduard Yes, there are better ways. JSON2Apex is a rather old utility, useful in most cases, but explicit mode wasn't the best idea. There's definitely better ways to do it.

          – sfdcfox
          Apr 9 at 7:59





          @Eduard Yes, there are better ways. JSON2Apex is a rather old utility, useful in most cases, but explicit mode wasn't the best idea. There's definitely better ways to do it.

          – sfdcfox
          Apr 9 at 7:59

















          draft saved

          draft discarded
















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid


          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function ()
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f257118%2fexplicitly-parse-json-string-vs-json-deserialize%23new-answer', 'question_page');

          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

          대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

          Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition