Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name? The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/Passover Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara To celebrate Mi Yodeya's tenth birthday, let's divide and conquer the entire…What rules did Hamechaber set to himself before compiling the Shulchan Aruch?Shulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?5th part of the shulchan aruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch
Can withdrawing asylum be illegal?
Word for: a synonym with a positive connotation?
What was the last x86 CPU that did not have the x87 floating-point unit built in?
Is an up-to-date browser secure on an out-of-date OS?
Simulating Exploding Dice
Do ℕ, mathbbN, BbbN, symbbN effectively differ, and is there a "canonical" specification of the naturals?
What is the padding with red substance inside of steak packaging?
For what reasons would an animal species NOT cross a *horizontal* land bridge?
Word to describe a time interval
Does Parliament need to approve the new Brexit delay to 31 October 2019?
What happens to a Warlock's expended Spell Slots when they gain a Level?
Why can't wing-mounted spoilers be used to steepen approaches?
Why can't devices on different VLANs, but on the same subnet, communicate?
How to determine omitted units in a publication
One-dimensional Japanese puzzle
Why doesn't a hydraulic lever violate conservation of energy?
Do warforged have souls?
The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG 1397BC53640DB551
Can a flute soloist sit?
What aspect of planet Earth must be changed to prevent the industrial revolution?
Loose spokes after only a few rides
Homework question about an engine pulling a train
Single author papers against my advisor's will?
Huge performance difference of the command find with and without using %M option to show permissions
Where does the Shulchan Aruch quote an authority by name?
The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are InParashat Metzora+HagadolPesach/Passover
Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?
Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
To celebrate Mi Yodeya's tenth birthday, let's divide and conquer the entire…What rules did Hamechaber set to himself before compiling the Shulchan Aruch?Shulchan Aruch UTF-8Anonymous glosses in the Shulchan AruchWhy is the Shulchan Aruch definitive?Siman 32, Kitzur Shulchan Aruch: UntranslatedLitvaks/Yeshivish and Shulchan AruchBuying a Shulchan AruchEnglish version of SHULCHAN ARUCHIs there any place where Shulchan Aruch rules with the Rosh against the Rif and Rambam?5th part of the shulchan aruchLearning to translate the Shulchan Aruch
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited Apr 9 at 7:27
Al Berko
6,5382529
asked Apr 8 at 23:22
DonielFDonielF
17.2k12690
add a comment |
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited Apr 9 at 7:27
Al Berko
6,5382529
asked Apr 8 at 23:22
DonielFDonielF
17.2k12690
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
Apr 9 at 0:34
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:50
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:29
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:36
add a comment |
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
edited Apr 9 at 7:27
Al Berko
6,5382529
asked Apr 8 at 23:22
DonielFDonielF
17.2k12690
Generally speaking, R' Yosef Karo doesn't quote authorities by name in his Shulchan Aruch, but rather focuses on what the halacha is in the Shulchan Aruch and leaves the various opinions and rationales to be explained in his Beis Yosef.
In going through Hilchos Pesach, I stumbled upon the first exception I've seen to this, in OC 460:2 (translation is Sefaria's):
הרא"ש היה משתדל במצת מצוה ועומד על עשיית' ומזרז העוסקים ומסייע בהן בעריכתן
The R"ASH would personally deliberate on the Matzot Mitzvah and oversee the production, inspire those working and assisting them in the flattening [of the dough].
Is this unique in the Shulchan Aruch, or are there other places where he refers to an authority by name?
shulchan-aruch
shulchan-aruch
edited Apr 9 at 7:27
Al Berko
6,5382529
asked Apr 8 at 23:22
DonielFDonielF
17.2k12690
edited Apr 9 at 7:27
Al Berko
6,5382529
asked Apr 8 at 23:22
DonielFDonielF
17.2k12690
edited Apr 9 at 7:27
Al Berko
6,5382529
edited Apr 9 at 7:27
Al Berko
6,5382529
edited Apr 9 at 7:27
Al Berko
6,5382529
6,5382529
asked Apr 8 at 23:22
DonielFDonielF
17.2k12690
asked Apr 8 at 23:22
DonielFDonielF
17.2k12690
asked Apr 8 at 23:22
DonielFDonielF
17.2k12690
17.2k12690
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
Apr 9 at 0:34
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:50
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:29
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:36
add a comment |
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
Apr 9 at 0:34
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:50
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:29
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:36
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
Apr 9 at 0:34
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
Apr 9 at 0:34
2
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:50
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:50
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:29
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:29
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:36
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:36
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered Apr 9 at 0:56
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered Apr 9 at 0:18
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:22
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
Apr 9 at 0:24
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:53
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:55
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered Apr 9 at 0:56
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered Apr 9 at 0:56
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
add a comment |
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered Apr 9 at 0:56
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
It's actually not that rare for the Shulchan Aruch to mention authorities by name. Here are a bunch of examples of different authorities mentioned:
In O.C. 34:1 he mentions a dispute involving Rashi, Rambam, and Rabbeinu Tam:
סדר הנחתן בבתיםלרש"י והרמב"ם קדש משמאל המניח בבית החיצון ואחריו כי יביאך בבית שני ושמע בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע בבית הרביעי שהוא בית החיצון ב לימינו ולר"ת בבית השלישי והיה אם שמוע ובבית הרביעי שהוא החיצון שמע ומנהג העולם כרש"י והרמב"ם
In O.C. 185:5 he mentions an uncertainty that Tosafos and the Rosh had:
ואם בירך והיתה צואה כנגדו או שהיה שכור (פי' לגמרי) נסתפקו התוספות והרא"ש אם צריך לחזור ולברך ומשום מי רגלים פשיטא שאינו חוזר לברך
In O.C. 320:14 he mentions a dispute between R. Meir of Rothenberg and the Rosh:
הר"מ מרוטנבורג מתיר להטיל מי רגלים בשלג והרא"ש היה נזהר
O.C. 591:6 he mentions that the Ran and the Rosh defended a custom:
והרא"ש והר"ן כתבו לקיים המנהג
There are many other examples of this, some where multiple authorities are listed together or contrasted, and some where only one authority is cited.
answered Apr 9 at 0:56
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
answered Apr 9 at 0:56
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
answered Apr 9 at 0:56
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
answered Apr 9 at 0:56
AlexAlex
23.5k157134
23.5k157134
add a comment |
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered Apr 9 at 0:18
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:22
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
Apr 9 at 0:24
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:53
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:55
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered Apr 9 at 0:18
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:22
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
Apr 9 at 0:24
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:53
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:55
add a comment |
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered Apr 9 at 0:18
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
Here's a double naming in hilchos muktza:
הרשב"א מתיר לטלטל האיצטרלו"ב בשבת וכן ספרי החכמה ולדעת הרמב"ם יש להסתפק בדבר:
answered Apr 9 at 0:18
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered Apr 9 at 0:18
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered Apr 9 at 0:18
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
answered Apr 9 at 0:18
user6591user6591
25.8k12758
25.8k12758
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:22
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
Apr 9 at 0:24
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:53
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:55
add a comment |
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:22
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
Apr 9 at 0:24
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:53
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:55
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:22
This one always stands out in my mind as the basis of the machlokes is arguably not in line with what we would say is each rabbi's philosophy about science.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:22
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
Apr 9 at 0:24
First thing to pop on my mind
– sam
Apr 9 at 0:24
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:53
There are dozens of such examples. The important thing to say in an answer is that it happens dozens of times. An example is helpful but not the primary info requested
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:53
1
1
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:55
@Double it's true there are many. I'm not sure based on his language what his primary goal was.
– user6591
Apr 9 at 0:55
add a comment |
I’d imagine opinions are cited by tefilin
– Dr. Shmuel
Apr 9 at 0:34
2
There are dozens of such examples
– Double AA♦
Apr 9 at 0:50
In general, do you imply Hamechaber had a systematic approach to writing S"A - like mentioning some and ignoring others?
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:29
Related (just posted) judaism.stackexchange.com/questions/101696/…
– Al Berko
Apr 9 at 7:36