Finding degree of a finite field extension Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that $[mathbfQ(sqrt1+i,sqrt2):mathbfQ]=8$.Generating Elements of Galois GroupFinding a primitive element for the field extension $mathbbQ(sqrtp_1,sqrtp_2,ldots,sqrtp_n)/mathbbQ$Showing that $a^phi(n)equiv 1pmod n$ when $a$ and $n$ are relatively primeThe analogue of euler's theorem in $mathbbF_p[x]$Exercise about field extensionsCounting total number of monic irreducible polynomials of all degrees $k$ that divide $m$.Elementary proof for $sqrtp_n+1 notin mathbbQ(sqrtp_1, sqrtp_2, ldots, sqrtp_n)$ where $p_i$ are different prime numbers.Proof involving modular and primesProve that the splitting field of $X^n - 1$ has degree $phi(n)$ over $mathbbQ$$mathbbQ(sqrt p_1+sqrt p_2)=mathbbQ(sqrt p_1,sqrt p_2)$ for $p_1,p_2$ primes.

Dating a Former Employee

How to react to hostile behavior from a senior developer?

Most bit efficient text communication method?

What would be the ideal power source for a cybernetic eye?

Is safe to use va_start macro with this as parameter?

What are the out-of-universe reasons for the references to Toby Maguire-era Spider-Man in ITSV

Wu formula for manifolds with boundary

What is homebrew?

Is there a kind of relay only consumes power when switching?

Uniqueness of spanning tree on a grid.

Do wooden building fires get hotter than 600°C?

What causes the direction of lightning flashes?

Denied boarding although I have proper visa and documentation. To whom should I make a complaint?

Using audio cues to encourage good posture

When the Haste spell ends on a creature, do attackers have advantage against that creature?

Is it fair for a professor to grade us on the possession of past papers?

Is there such thing as an Availability Group failover trigger?

How do I stop a creek from eroding my steep embankment?

Delete nth line from bottom

Can anything be seen from the center of the Boötes void? How dark would it be?

Irreducible of finite Krull dimension implies quasi-compact?

Why are there no cargo aircraft with "flying wing" design?

If a VARCHAR(MAX) column is included in an index, is the entire value always stored in the index page(s)?

Compare a given version number in the form major.minor.build.patch and see if one is less than the other



Finding degree of a finite field extension



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)Prove that $[mathbfQ(sqrt1+i,sqrt2):mathbfQ]=8$.Generating Elements of Galois GroupFinding a primitive element for the field extension $mathbbQ(sqrtp_1,sqrtp_2,ldots,sqrtp_n)/mathbbQ$Showing that $a^phi(n)equiv 1pmod n$ when $a$ and $n$ are relatively primeThe analogue of euler's theorem in $mathbbF_p[x]$Exercise about field extensionsCounting total number of monic irreducible polynomials of all degrees $k$ that divide $m$.Elementary proof for $sqrtp_n+1 notin mathbbQ(sqrtp_1, sqrtp_2, ldots, sqrtp_n)$ where $p_i$ are different prime numbers.Proof involving modular and primesProve that the splitting field of $X^n - 1$ has degree $phi(n)$ over $mathbbQ$$mathbbQ(sqrt p_1+sqrt p_2)=mathbbQ(sqrt p_1,sqrt p_2)$ for $p_1,p_2$ primes.










4












$begingroup$


Let $x=sqrt2+sqrt3+ldots+sqrtn, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbbQ(x):mathbbQ]=2^phi(n)$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.



I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbbQ(sqrtp_1+ldots+sqrtp_n):mathbbQ]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.




The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbbQ(x):mathbbQ]=2^pi(n)$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is this a conjecture or a thm?
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Apr 13 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    This is a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 15:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not $2^pi(n)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Apr 13 at 15:40















4












$begingroup$


Let $x=sqrt2+sqrt3+ldots+sqrtn, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbbQ(x):mathbbQ]=2^phi(n)$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.



I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbbQ(sqrtp_1+ldots+sqrtp_n):mathbbQ]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.




The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbbQ(x):mathbbQ]=2^pi(n)$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$











  • $begingroup$
    Is this a conjecture or a thm?
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Apr 13 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    This is a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 15:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not $2^pi(n)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Apr 13 at 15:40













4












4








4


3



$begingroup$


Let $x=sqrt2+sqrt3+ldots+sqrtn, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbbQ(x):mathbbQ]=2^phi(n)$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.



I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbbQ(sqrtp_1+ldots+sqrtp_n):mathbbQ]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.




The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbbQ(x):mathbbQ]=2^pi(n)$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.











share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Let $x=sqrt2+sqrt3+ldots+sqrtn, ngeq 2$. I want to show that $[mathbbQ(x):mathbbQ]=2^phi(n)$, where $phi$ is Euler's totient function.



I know that if $p_1,ldots,p_n$ are pairwise relatively prime then $[mathbbQ(sqrtp_1+ldots+sqrtp_n):mathbbQ]=2^n$. But how to proceed in the above case? I could not apply induction also. Any help is appreciated.




The assertion is false. Actually $[mathbbQ(x):mathbbQ]=2^pi(n)$, where $pi(n)$ is the number of prime numbers less than or equal to $n$.








abstract-algebra galois-theory extension-field






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited Apr 13 at 16:41







Anupam

















asked Apr 13 at 15:05









AnupamAnupam

2,5741925




2,5741925











  • $begingroup$
    Is this a conjecture or a thm?
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Apr 13 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    This is a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 15:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not $2^pi(n)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Apr 13 at 15:40
















  • $begingroup$
    Is this a conjecture or a thm?
    $endgroup$
    – Wuestenfux
    Apr 13 at 15:18










  • $begingroup$
    This is a theorem.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 15:23






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Why not $2^pi(n)$?
    $endgroup$
    – Lord Shark the Unknown
    Apr 13 at 15:40















$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18




$begingroup$
Is this a conjecture or a thm?
$endgroup$
– Wuestenfux
Apr 13 at 15:18












$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23




$begingroup$
This is a theorem.
$endgroup$
– Anupam
Apr 13 at 15:23




1




1




$begingroup$
Why not $2^pi(n)$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40




$begingroup$
Why not $2^pi(n)$?
$endgroup$
– Lord Shark the Unknown
Apr 13 at 15:40










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ pi (n) -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ and hence we get $$ 2^ pi (n) -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
$$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ pi(n) $$



Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ pi (n) $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ sqrt p_i , sqrt p_ip_j,... $ and hence $N= L$



So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j ) |_ mathbb Q right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ pi (n) $$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
    $endgroup$
    – Anupam
    Apr 13 at 16:45










  • $begingroup$
    @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of $sqrt p_i,sqrt p_ip_j,...$", which I think is the cumbersome point.
    $endgroup$
    – nguyen quang do
    Apr 14 at 7:28











  • $begingroup$
    OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt p_i : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
    $endgroup$
    – Ignorant Mathematician
    Apr 14 at 7:37



















1












$begingroup$

This is false...take n=5 for instance






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$




















    1












    $begingroup$

    I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/mathbf Q^*^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$ being just a product $bar 2^epsilon_2...bar n^epsilon_n$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.






    share|cite|improve this answer









    $endgroup$













      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function()
      var channelOptions =
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      ;
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
      createEditor();
      );

      else
      createEditor();

      );

      function createEditor()
      StackExchange.prepareEditor(
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader:
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      ,
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      );



      );













      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function ()
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186343%2ffinding-degree-of-a-finite-field-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');

      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



      Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



      Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ pi (n) -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ and hence we get $$ 2^ pi (n) -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
      $$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



      And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ pi(n) $$



      Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ pi (n) $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ sqrt p_i , sqrt p_ip_j,... $ and hence $N= L$



      So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j ) |_ mathbb Q right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ pi (n) $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
        $endgroup$
        – Anupam
        Apr 13 at 16:45










      • $begingroup$
        @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of $sqrt p_i,sqrt p_ip_j,...$", which I think is the cumbersome point.
        $endgroup$
        – nguyen quang do
        Apr 14 at 7:28











      • $begingroup$
        OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt p_i : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
        $endgroup$
        – Ignorant Mathematician
        Apr 14 at 7:37
















      4












      $begingroup$

      Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



      Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



      Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ pi (n) -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ and hence we get $$ 2^ pi (n) -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
      $$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



      And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ pi(n) $$



      Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ pi (n) $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ sqrt p_i , sqrt p_ip_j,... $ and hence $N= L$



      So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j ) |_ mathbb Q right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ pi (n) $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$












      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
        $endgroup$
        – Anupam
        Apr 13 at 16:45










      • $begingroup$
        @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of $sqrt p_i,sqrt p_ip_j,...$", which I think is the cumbersome point.
        $endgroup$
        – nguyen quang do
        Apr 14 at 7:28











      • $begingroup$
        OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt p_i : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
        $endgroup$
        – Ignorant Mathematician
        Apr 14 at 7:37














      4












      4








      4





      $begingroup$

      Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



      Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



      Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ pi (n) -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ and hence we get $$ 2^ pi (n) -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
      $$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



      And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ pi(n) $$



      Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ pi (n) $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ sqrt p_i , sqrt p_ip_j,... $ and hence $N= L$



      So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j ) |_ mathbb Q right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ pi (n) $$






      share|cite|improve this answer











      $endgroup$



      Let $L= mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j )$ , $k= mathbb Q$ and $ N = mathbb Q ( sqrt 2, sqrt 3 ,... , sqrt n ) $ .



      Clearly $ N|_k $ is Galois and the Galois group is of the form $ mathbb Z_2 ^m$ for some $m$ since every $k$ automorphism of $N$ has order at most $2$. Note that each element of $Gal (N|_k)$ is completely specified by it's action on $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ by the fundamental theorem of arithmetic. So this gives $$ m leq pi (n)$$



      Now if the Galois group is $ mathbb Z_2 ^m $ then it will have $2^m -1$ subgroups of index $2$ and hence there exist $2^m -1 $ subfields $F$ of $N $ containing $k$ such that $F:k=2$ . But we already have $ 2^ pi (n) -1$ many such subfields by taking product of a nonempty subset of $ sqrt p : p prime p leq n $ and hence we get $$ 2^ pi (n) -1 leq 2^ m -1 $$
      $$ implies pi (n) leq m $$



      And hence $$Gal ( N|_k) = mathbb Z_2 ^ pi(n) $$



      Now we just observe that the orbit of $ sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j $ under the action of $Gal(N|_k) $ contains $2^ pi (n) $ distinct elements by linear independence of $ sqrt p_i , sqrt p_ip_j,... $ and hence $N= L$



      So $$Gal left ( mathbb Q ( sum _j=1 ^n sqrt j ) |_ mathbb Q right ) cong mathbb Z _2 ^ pi (n) $$







      share|cite|improve this answer














      share|cite|improve this answer



      share|cite|improve this answer








      edited Apr 13 at 19:04

























      answered Apr 13 at 15:36









      Ignorant MathematicianIgnorant Mathematician

      1,840114




      1,840114











      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
        $endgroup$
        – Anupam
        Apr 13 at 16:45










      • $begingroup$
        @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of $sqrt p_i,sqrt p_ip_j,...$", which I think is the cumbersome point.
        $endgroup$
        – nguyen quang do
        Apr 14 at 7:28











      • $begingroup$
        OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt p_i : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
        $endgroup$
        – Ignorant Mathematician
        Apr 14 at 7:37

















      • $begingroup$
        Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
        $endgroup$
        – Anupam
        Apr 13 at 16:45










      • $begingroup$
        @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of $sqrt p_i,sqrt p_ip_j,...$", which I think is the cumbersome point.
        $endgroup$
        – nguyen quang do
        Apr 14 at 7:28











      • $begingroup$
        OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt p_i : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
        $endgroup$
        – Ignorant Mathematician
        Apr 14 at 7:37
















      $begingroup$
      Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Anupam
      Apr 13 at 16:45




      $begingroup$
      Yeah I am wrong. Thus I am changing the question.
      $endgroup$
      – Anupam
      Apr 13 at 16:45












      $begingroup$
      @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of $sqrt p_i,sqrt p_ip_j,...$", which I think is the cumbersome point.
      $endgroup$
      – nguyen quang do
      Apr 14 at 7:28





      $begingroup$
      @Soumik Ghosh You should have insisted on the "linear independence of $sqrt p_i,sqrt p_ip_j,...$", which I think is the cumbersome point.
      $endgroup$
      – nguyen quang do
      Apr 14 at 7:28













      $begingroup$
      OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt p_i : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
      $endgroup$
      – Ignorant Mathematician
      Apr 14 at 7:37





      $begingroup$
      OP already knows $mathbb Q(sqrt p_i : 1=1,...,n) :mathbb Q$ is of degree $2^n$ . Then linear independence is a triviality.
      $endgroup$
      – Ignorant Mathematician
      Apr 14 at 7:37












      1












      $begingroup$

      This is false...take n=5 for instance






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$

















        1












        $begingroup$

        This is false...take n=5 for instance






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$















          1












          1








          1





          $begingroup$

          This is false...take n=5 for instance






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          This is false...take n=5 for instance







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered Apr 13 at 15:49









          Sagnik DuttaSagnik Dutta

          542




          542





















              1












              $begingroup$

              I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/mathbf Q^*^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$ being just a product $bar 2^epsilon_2...bar n^epsilon_n$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.






              share|cite|improve this answer









              $endgroup$

















                1












                $begingroup$

                I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/mathbf Q^*^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$ being just a product $bar 2^epsilon_2...bar n^epsilon_n$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.






                share|cite|improve this answer









                $endgroup$















                  1












                  1








                  1





                  $begingroup$

                  I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/mathbf Q^*^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$ being just a product $bar 2^epsilon_2...bar n^epsilon_n$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.






                  share|cite|improve this answer









                  $endgroup$



                  I think that Kummer gives the neatest proof, using only the multiplicative structure of $mathbf Q^*$. For a fixed $nge 2$, let $K=mathbf Q (sqrt 2, sqrt 3,...,sqrt n)$ and $mu_2=(pm 1)$. Kummer theory tells us that $K/mathbf Q$ is an abelian extension, with Galois group $Gcong Hom (V,mu_2)$, where $V$ is the subgroup of $mathbf Q^*/mathbf Q^*^2$ generated by the classes $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$. Although $V$ is a multiplicative group, it will be convenient to view it as a vector space over $mathbf F_2$, a linear combination of $bar 2,...,bar n$ mod $mathbf Q^*^2$ being just a product $bar 2^epsilon_2...bar n^epsilon_n$, with $epsilon_i=0$ or $1$. We aim to show that the $mathbf F_2$-dimension of $V$ is $pi (n)$, the number of rational primes $le n$. Let $W$ be the $mathbf F_2$-subspace generated by the classes of these primes. For for any $mle n$, the prime factorization of $m$ in $mathbf Z$ immediately shows that $bar m$ is a linear combination of the classes of the primes $le m$, which implies that $V=W$. It remains only to show that $W$ has $mathbf F_2$-dimension $pi (n)$, e.g. that the classes $bar p_i$ of the primes $le n$ form a basis. But a relation of linear dependence among them would mean that some finite product $prod p_i$ is a rational square, which contradicts the fact that $mathbf Z$ is a UFD.







                  share|cite|improve this answer












                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer










                  answered Apr 14 at 7:33









                  nguyen quang donguyen quang do

                  9,2241724




                  9,2241724



























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded
















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid


                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function ()
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3186343%2ffinding-degree-of-a-finite-field-extension%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      getting Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender working in the command lineHow to connect to CheckPoint VPN on Ubuntu 18.04LTS?Will the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxLinux Checkpoint SNX tool configuration issuesCheck Point - Connect under Linux - snx + OTPSNX VPN Ububuntu 18.XXUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificateVPN with network manager (nm-applet) is not workingWill the Linux ( red-hat ) Open VPNC Client connect to checkpoint or nortel VPN gateways?VPN client for linux machine + support checkpoint gatewayImport VPN config files to NetworkManager from command lineTrouble connecting to VPN using network-manager, while command line worksStart a VPN connection with PPTP protocol on command linestarting a docker service daemon breaks the vpn networkCan't connect to vpn with Network-managerVPN SSL Network Extender in FirefoxUsing Checkpoint VPN SSL Network Extender CLI with certificate

                      Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition

                      Marilyn Monroe Ny fiainany manokana | Jereo koa | Meny fitetezanafanitarana azy.