Debian 9 halt does not really power off in new versions - why?2019 Community Moderator ElectionWhat is the difference between Halt and Shutdown commands?DPMS does not work: the monitor is not switched offConsole won't power off on PowerPC with Debianwhy debian repository does not contain lokkit?Why is Debian updating old package versions instead of offering new versions? (openssl)Why does the same Debian release have different kernel versions?Resuming Linux from hibernate on ThinkPad X220 fails with black screen or rebootDoes Debian 9 (Stretch) have a new updating mechanism?ACPI kernel parameter options for HP ProLiant DL380 G5How to power off normally after Debian crashed?Debian stretch does not boot

Would this string work as string?

Asserting that Atheism and Theism are both faith based positions

Help with identifying unique aircraft over NE Pennsylvania

How much propellant is used up until liftoff?

Why is "la Gestapo" feminine?

Knife as defense against stray dogs

Why doesn't the fusion process of the sun speed up?

If I cast enlarge/reduce on an arrow, what weapon could it count as?

Air travel with refrigerated insulin

Did Nintendo change its mind about 68000 SNES?

Writing in a Christian voice

Why is participating in the European Parliamentary elections used as a threat?

Print last inputted byte

Hackerrank All Women's Codesprint 2019: Name the Product

Print a physical multiplication table

How can I create URL shortcuts/redirects for task/diff IDs in Phabricator?

Does convergence of polynomials imply that of its coefficients?

TDE Master Key Rotation

pipe commands inside find -exec?

What is the reasoning behind standardization (dividing by standard deviation)?

What (if any) is the reason to buy in small local stores?

Friend wants my recommendation but I don't want to

Don't understand why (5 | -2) > 0 is False where (5 or -2) > 0 is True

Splitting fasta file into smaller files based on header pattern



Debian 9 halt does not really power off in new versions - why?



2019 Community Moderator ElectionWhat is the difference between Halt and Shutdown commands?DPMS does not work: the monitor is not switched offConsole won't power off on PowerPC with Debianwhy debian repository does not contain lokkit?Why is Debian updating old package versions instead of offering new versions? (openssl)Why does the same Debian release have different kernel versions?Resuming Linux from hibernate on ThinkPad X220 fails with black screen or rebootDoes Debian 9 (Stretch) have a new updating mechanism?ACPI kernel parameter options for HP ProLiant DL380 G5How to power off normally after Debian crashed?Debian stretch does not boot










2















IMPORTANT:
I am able to restore halt old behavior if I do:



apt install sysvinit-core 


Plus: Old RedHat based versions are able to power off with halt too.



I am trying to understand why in Debian 9 you should not use halt to turn off your computer anymore. That behavior are removed from systemd. I am a bit scary, but I think there must be a good logical reason.



Are other unixes or unix-like with this same behavior or are Linux turning into something different?



Now if you want to turn off the machine after the system shutdown you should use poweroff instead of halt...



Somebody know how this command are interpreted in other Unix-Like?



That is not a duplicated, because, debian 7 can power off with halt for example.










share|improve this question
























  • Plain halt powers off a macOS system, but not an OpenBSD system. halt is not a POSIX utility, nor is poweroff or shutdown or any similar utility.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 14 at 18:30












  • Not duplicated, because halt can power off Debian 8 for example. I just dont understand why removing that behavior!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    Mar 14 at 18:41







  • 1





    @DopeGhoti I don't think this is a dupe. The OP wants to know why this change happened, not what the difference between halt and shutdown may be.

    – terdon
    Mar 14 at 19:10






  • 1





    Yes, exactly, I am trying to understand why this change happened. Thank you.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    Mar 14 at 19:35






  • 1





    halt allows for the system to be halted with diagnostic kernel messages still visible on the console on some systems; this is the reason for a distinction between halt and poweroff to exist at all.

    – DopeGhoti
    Mar 14 at 21:42















2















IMPORTANT:
I am able to restore halt old behavior if I do:



apt install sysvinit-core 


Plus: Old RedHat based versions are able to power off with halt too.



I am trying to understand why in Debian 9 you should not use halt to turn off your computer anymore. That behavior are removed from systemd. I am a bit scary, but I think there must be a good logical reason.



Are other unixes or unix-like with this same behavior or are Linux turning into something different?



Now if you want to turn off the machine after the system shutdown you should use poweroff instead of halt...



Somebody know how this command are interpreted in other Unix-Like?



That is not a duplicated, because, debian 7 can power off with halt for example.










share|improve this question
























  • Plain halt powers off a macOS system, but not an OpenBSD system. halt is not a POSIX utility, nor is poweroff or shutdown or any similar utility.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 14 at 18:30












  • Not duplicated, because halt can power off Debian 8 for example. I just dont understand why removing that behavior!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    Mar 14 at 18:41







  • 1





    @DopeGhoti I don't think this is a dupe. The OP wants to know why this change happened, not what the difference between halt and shutdown may be.

    – terdon
    Mar 14 at 19:10






  • 1





    Yes, exactly, I am trying to understand why this change happened. Thank you.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    Mar 14 at 19:35






  • 1





    halt allows for the system to be halted with diagnostic kernel messages still visible on the console on some systems; this is the reason for a distinction between halt and poweroff to exist at all.

    – DopeGhoti
    Mar 14 at 21:42













2












2








2








IMPORTANT:
I am able to restore halt old behavior if I do:



apt install sysvinit-core 


Plus: Old RedHat based versions are able to power off with halt too.



I am trying to understand why in Debian 9 you should not use halt to turn off your computer anymore. That behavior are removed from systemd. I am a bit scary, but I think there must be a good logical reason.



Are other unixes or unix-like with this same behavior or are Linux turning into something different?



Now if you want to turn off the machine after the system shutdown you should use poweroff instead of halt...



Somebody know how this command are interpreted in other Unix-Like?



That is not a duplicated, because, debian 7 can power off with halt for example.










share|improve this question
















IMPORTANT:
I am able to restore halt old behavior if I do:



apt install sysvinit-core 


Plus: Old RedHat based versions are able to power off with halt too.



I am trying to understand why in Debian 9 you should not use halt to turn off your computer anymore. That behavior are removed from systemd. I am a bit scary, but I think there must be a good logical reason.



Are other unixes or unix-like with this same behavior or are Linux turning into something different?



Now if you want to turn off the machine after the system shutdown you should use poweroff instead of halt...



Somebody know how this command are interpreted in other Unix-Like?



That is not a duplicated, because, debian 7 can power off with halt for example.







debian halt






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago







Luciano Andress Martini

















asked Mar 14 at 18:25









Luciano Andress MartiniLuciano Andress Martini

4,0031136




4,0031136












  • Plain halt powers off a macOS system, but not an OpenBSD system. halt is not a POSIX utility, nor is poweroff or shutdown or any similar utility.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 14 at 18:30












  • Not duplicated, because halt can power off Debian 8 for example. I just dont understand why removing that behavior!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    Mar 14 at 18:41







  • 1





    @DopeGhoti I don't think this is a dupe. The OP wants to know why this change happened, not what the difference between halt and shutdown may be.

    – terdon
    Mar 14 at 19:10






  • 1





    Yes, exactly, I am trying to understand why this change happened. Thank you.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    Mar 14 at 19:35






  • 1





    halt allows for the system to be halted with diagnostic kernel messages still visible on the console on some systems; this is the reason for a distinction between halt and poweroff to exist at all.

    – DopeGhoti
    Mar 14 at 21:42

















  • Plain halt powers off a macOS system, but not an OpenBSD system. halt is not a POSIX utility, nor is poweroff or shutdown or any similar utility.

    – Kusalananda
    Mar 14 at 18:30












  • Not duplicated, because halt can power off Debian 8 for example. I just dont understand why removing that behavior!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    Mar 14 at 18:41







  • 1





    @DopeGhoti I don't think this is a dupe. The OP wants to know why this change happened, not what the difference between halt and shutdown may be.

    – terdon
    Mar 14 at 19:10






  • 1





    Yes, exactly, I am trying to understand why this change happened. Thank you.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    Mar 14 at 19:35






  • 1





    halt allows for the system to be halted with diagnostic kernel messages still visible on the console on some systems; this is the reason for a distinction between halt and poweroff to exist at all.

    – DopeGhoti
    Mar 14 at 21:42
















Plain halt powers off a macOS system, but not an OpenBSD system. halt is not a POSIX utility, nor is poweroff or shutdown or any similar utility.

– Kusalananda
Mar 14 at 18:30






Plain halt powers off a macOS system, but not an OpenBSD system. halt is not a POSIX utility, nor is poweroff or shutdown or any similar utility.

– Kusalananda
Mar 14 at 18:30














Not duplicated, because halt can power off Debian 8 for example. I just dont understand why removing that behavior!

– Luciano Andress Martini
Mar 14 at 18:41






Not duplicated, because halt can power off Debian 8 for example. I just dont understand why removing that behavior!

– Luciano Andress Martini
Mar 14 at 18:41





1




1





@DopeGhoti I don't think this is a dupe. The OP wants to know why this change happened, not what the difference between halt and shutdown may be.

– terdon
Mar 14 at 19:10





@DopeGhoti I don't think this is a dupe. The OP wants to know why this change happened, not what the difference between halt and shutdown may be.

– terdon
Mar 14 at 19:10




1




1





Yes, exactly, I am trying to understand why this change happened. Thank you.

– Luciano Andress Martini
Mar 14 at 19:35





Yes, exactly, I am trying to understand why this change happened. Thank you.

– Luciano Andress Martini
Mar 14 at 19:35




1




1





halt allows for the system to be halted with diagnostic kernel messages still visible on the console on some systems; this is the reason for a distinction between halt and poweroff to exist at all.

– DopeGhoti
Mar 14 at 21:42





halt allows for the system to be halted with diagnostic kernel messages still visible on the console on some systems; this is the reason for a distinction between halt and poweroff to exist at all.

– DopeGhoti
Mar 14 at 21:42










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Debian



When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff.



Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.



RHEL/CentOS



RHEL/CentOS 5 was the last version to use SysVinit: version 6 used upstart and version 7 uses systemd. In RHEL 5.11, the last script to run when transitioning to runlevel 0 is /etc/init.d/halt, and its last lines are:



[ "$INIT_HALT" != "HALT" ] && HALTARGS="$HALTARGS -p"

exec $command $HALTARGS


Since the same script is also run at the end of transition to runlevel 6 (reboot), the actual command to run is defined by the variable $command, and it will be either /sbin/halt or /sbin/reboot. According to the value of the $INIT_HALT variable, the script will decide whether or not add the -p option. That variable is set by /sbin/shutdown. The RHEL 5.11 shutdown(8) man page says:




HALT OR POWEROFF



The -H option just sets the init environment variable INIT_HALT to HALT, and the -P option just sets that variable to POWEROFF. The shutdown script that calls halt(8) as the last thing in the shutdown sequence should check these environment variables and call halt(8) with the right options for these options to actually have any effect.
Debian 3.1 (sarge) supports this.




(Yes, the RHEL 5.11 man page mentions Debian 3.1! I guess someone at RedHat porting patches from various sources to RHEL missed one reference...)



It looks like RedHat has decided to code the above-mentioned test in the /etc/init.d/halt script in such a way that switching off the power (using /sbin/halt -p at the end of shutdown) is the default halt action: the only way to achieve halt without poweroff is to use the upper-case -H option of the shutdown command to explicitly request it, e.g. shutdown -hH now



But again, the default powerdown is triggered by the runlevel scripts customized by the Linux distribution, so it's not really a feature of the SysVinit halt command.



Historical note



Old SysVinit-using systems (both Linux and non) used to have several commands that were not intended to be used directly, but only as part of the appropriate shutdown/reboot scripts. Before SysVinit 2.74, the /sbin/halt command with no options would have done the same as halt -f of modern SysVinit does, i.e. a brutal, immediate kernel shutdown without stopping any services or unmounting filesystems.



For the same reason, being used to the Linux killall command can be dangerous on other Unixes. Its man page even has this ominous warning:




Be warned that typing killall name may not have the desired effect on non-Linux systems, especially when done by a privileged user.




This is because the classic SystemV killall was one of those commands designed to be used only as part of a shutdown script. In Linux distributions with SysVinit, the classic version of the command may be found as killall5. It literally kills all processes except kernel threads and processes in its own session: its intended use is in a shutdown script after shutting down all services, just before unmounting the local filesystems, to kill of any other processes that might delay or prevent the unmounting.



(How I know this, you ask? Well, I once made the mistake of running killall <something> as root on a Solaris 2.6 system. A very effective learning experience.)






share|improve this answer

























  • Yes that is what I am expecting! Very nice informations! Thank you a lot, specially about the notes about Red Hat doing the same behavior in older versions!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    5 hours ago



















4














This question is predicated upon multiple falsehoods.



One did not use halt to turn off one's computer, and this has not changed with systemd.



halt a.k.a. haltsys shuts down and halts. poweroff is a newer command that shuts down and powers off. (https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/196471/5132 explains the subtleties of this which I am going to gloss over here, since the question is only about Linux operating systems. This answer focuses on just the AT&T System 5 UNIX side of the universe.)



As I explained at https://superuser.com/a/900205/38062, computers are not necessarily able to power off under software control. The action of the haltsys and halt command has conventionally been to shutdown and halt the machine, the next action being the operator using a physical reset button or power switch.



halt gained a -p/--poweroff option to make it equivalent to poweroff, but this is symptomatic of a general growth of overlapping and self-contradictory options to these commands. Witness the manual page for the Upstart halt command in Debian 7. There's halt --poweroff there. The manual page for the van Smoorenburg halt command in Debian 7 similarly has halt -p.



But this is not something that has changed with systemd. systemd provides the same. The systemd halt command also has --poweroff. It furthermore has --reboot and (for good measure) --halt options.



I had to do the same with the halt/haltsys command in the nosh toolset, for compatibility.



You may erroneously think that plain old halt powered off your computer. But that was unequivocally wrong for Upstart, and only true for the van Smoorenburg toolset if you happened to hit a bug.



The bug, which has only this year finally been fixed, was that the van Smoorenburg halt command would simply ignore the presence or absence of the -p option and instead decide whether to halt or power off according to the value of a setting in /etc/default/halt. If you happened to have that setting set to power off, then halt would always power off, even if no -p option were supplied. Conversely, if you happened to have that setting set to halt, then halt would always halt, even if a -p option were supplied.



But this was a bug, not the documented nor intended behaviour, not the behaviour of every halt command that was available on Debian, and not the conventional behaviour of the halt command in general.



Further reading



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018-12-07). Bug#586709: closed by Thomas Goirand. Debian bug #586709.

  • Jessie Smith (2019-03-08). initscripts: command halt unintended changed behaviour. Debian bug #743555.





share|improve this answer























  • A falsehood that running apt install sysvinit-core turned true! Why? I just installed sysvinit, and at end halt says "Will now halt" exactly in that moment the machine powered off, how could this be a falsehood, it looks like the developer of sysvinit still has this falsehood! and plus that halt -f turns off the machine immediately.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    11 hours ago







  • 1





    When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff. Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.

    – telcoM
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @telcoM Thank you very much for this! That is enough for me, if you put that as a answer I will mark it as the correct answer. (Note one thing (not very important), CentOS seems to have the same behavior in my old servers). Can you post this as a answer please?

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    8 hours ago











Your Answer








StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "106"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506341%2fdebian-9-halt-does-not-really-power-off-in-new-versions-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3














Debian



When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff.



Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.



RHEL/CentOS



RHEL/CentOS 5 was the last version to use SysVinit: version 6 used upstart and version 7 uses systemd. In RHEL 5.11, the last script to run when transitioning to runlevel 0 is /etc/init.d/halt, and its last lines are:



[ "$INIT_HALT" != "HALT" ] && HALTARGS="$HALTARGS -p"

exec $command $HALTARGS


Since the same script is also run at the end of transition to runlevel 6 (reboot), the actual command to run is defined by the variable $command, and it will be either /sbin/halt or /sbin/reboot. According to the value of the $INIT_HALT variable, the script will decide whether or not add the -p option. That variable is set by /sbin/shutdown. The RHEL 5.11 shutdown(8) man page says:




HALT OR POWEROFF



The -H option just sets the init environment variable INIT_HALT to HALT, and the -P option just sets that variable to POWEROFF. The shutdown script that calls halt(8) as the last thing in the shutdown sequence should check these environment variables and call halt(8) with the right options for these options to actually have any effect.
Debian 3.1 (sarge) supports this.




(Yes, the RHEL 5.11 man page mentions Debian 3.1! I guess someone at RedHat porting patches from various sources to RHEL missed one reference...)



It looks like RedHat has decided to code the above-mentioned test in the /etc/init.d/halt script in such a way that switching off the power (using /sbin/halt -p at the end of shutdown) is the default halt action: the only way to achieve halt without poweroff is to use the upper-case -H option of the shutdown command to explicitly request it, e.g. shutdown -hH now



But again, the default powerdown is triggered by the runlevel scripts customized by the Linux distribution, so it's not really a feature of the SysVinit halt command.



Historical note



Old SysVinit-using systems (both Linux and non) used to have several commands that were not intended to be used directly, but only as part of the appropriate shutdown/reboot scripts. Before SysVinit 2.74, the /sbin/halt command with no options would have done the same as halt -f of modern SysVinit does, i.e. a brutal, immediate kernel shutdown without stopping any services or unmounting filesystems.



For the same reason, being used to the Linux killall command can be dangerous on other Unixes. Its man page even has this ominous warning:




Be warned that typing killall name may not have the desired effect on non-Linux systems, especially when done by a privileged user.




This is because the classic SystemV killall was one of those commands designed to be used only as part of a shutdown script. In Linux distributions with SysVinit, the classic version of the command may be found as killall5. It literally kills all processes except kernel threads and processes in its own session: its intended use is in a shutdown script after shutting down all services, just before unmounting the local filesystems, to kill of any other processes that might delay or prevent the unmounting.



(How I know this, you ask? Well, I once made the mistake of running killall <something> as root on a Solaris 2.6 system. A very effective learning experience.)






share|improve this answer

























  • Yes that is what I am expecting! Very nice informations! Thank you a lot, specially about the notes about Red Hat doing the same behavior in older versions!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    5 hours ago
















3














Debian



When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff.



Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.



RHEL/CentOS



RHEL/CentOS 5 was the last version to use SysVinit: version 6 used upstart and version 7 uses systemd. In RHEL 5.11, the last script to run when transitioning to runlevel 0 is /etc/init.d/halt, and its last lines are:



[ "$INIT_HALT" != "HALT" ] && HALTARGS="$HALTARGS -p"

exec $command $HALTARGS


Since the same script is also run at the end of transition to runlevel 6 (reboot), the actual command to run is defined by the variable $command, and it will be either /sbin/halt or /sbin/reboot. According to the value of the $INIT_HALT variable, the script will decide whether or not add the -p option. That variable is set by /sbin/shutdown. The RHEL 5.11 shutdown(8) man page says:




HALT OR POWEROFF



The -H option just sets the init environment variable INIT_HALT to HALT, and the -P option just sets that variable to POWEROFF. The shutdown script that calls halt(8) as the last thing in the shutdown sequence should check these environment variables and call halt(8) with the right options for these options to actually have any effect.
Debian 3.1 (sarge) supports this.




(Yes, the RHEL 5.11 man page mentions Debian 3.1! I guess someone at RedHat porting patches from various sources to RHEL missed one reference...)



It looks like RedHat has decided to code the above-mentioned test in the /etc/init.d/halt script in such a way that switching off the power (using /sbin/halt -p at the end of shutdown) is the default halt action: the only way to achieve halt without poweroff is to use the upper-case -H option of the shutdown command to explicitly request it, e.g. shutdown -hH now



But again, the default powerdown is triggered by the runlevel scripts customized by the Linux distribution, so it's not really a feature of the SysVinit halt command.



Historical note



Old SysVinit-using systems (both Linux and non) used to have several commands that were not intended to be used directly, but only as part of the appropriate shutdown/reboot scripts. Before SysVinit 2.74, the /sbin/halt command with no options would have done the same as halt -f of modern SysVinit does, i.e. a brutal, immediate kernel shutdown without stopping any services or unmounting filesystems.



For the same reason, being used to the Linux killall command can be dangerous on other Unixes. Its man page even has this ominous warning:




Be warned that typing killall name may not have the desired effect on non-Linux systems, especially when done by a privileged user.




This is because the classic SystemV killall was one of those commands designed to be used only as part of a shutdown script. In Linux distributions with SysVinit, the classic version of the command may be found as killall5. It literally kills all processes except kernel threads and processes in its own session: its intended use is in a shutdown script after shutting down all services, just before unmounting the local filesystems, to kill of any other processes that might delay or prevent the unmounting.



(How I know this, you ask? Well, I once made the mistake of running killall <something> as root on a Solaris 2.6 system. A very effective learning experience.)






share|improve this answer

























  • Yes that is what I am expecting! Very nice informations! Thank you a lot, specially about the notes about Red Hat doing the same behavior in older versions!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    5 hours ago














3












3








3







Debian



When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff.



Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.



RHEL/CentOS



RHEL/CentOS 5 was the last version to use SysVinit: version 6 used upstart and version 7 uses systemd. In RHEL 5.11, the last script to run when transitioning to runlevel 0 is /etc/init.d/halt, and its last lines are:



[ "$INIT_HALT" != "HALT" ] && HALTARGS="$HALTARGS -p"

exec $command $HALTARGS


Since the same script is also run at the end of transition to runlevel 6 (reboot), the actual command to run is defined by the variable $command, and it will be either /sbin/halt or /sbin/reboot. According to the value of the $INIT_HALT variable, the script will decide whether or not add the -p option. That variable is set by /sbin/shutdown. The RHEL 5.11 shutdown(8) man page says:




HALT OR POWEROFF



The -H option just sets the init environment variable INIT_HALT to HALT, and the -P option just sets that variable to POWEROFF. The shutdown script that calls halt(8) as the last thing in the shutdown sequence should check these environment variables and call halt(8) with the right options for these options to actually have any effect.
Debian 3.1 (sarge) supports this.




(Yes, the RHEL 5.11 man page mentions Debian 3.1! I guess someone at RedHat porting patches from various sources to RHEL missed one reference...)



It looks like RedHat has decided to code the above-mentioned test in the /etc/init.d/halt script in such a way that switching off the power (using /sbin/halt -p at the end of shutdown) is the default halt action: the only way to achieve halt without poweroff is to use the upper-case -H option of the shutdown command to explicitly request it, e.g. shutdown -hH now



But again, the default powerdown is triggered by the runlevel scripts customized by the Linux distribution, so it's not really a feature of the SysVinit halt command.



Historical note



Old SysVinit-using systems (both Linux and non) used to have several commands that were not intended to be used directly, but only as part of the appropriate shutdown/reboot scripts. Before SysVinit 2.74, the /sbin/halt command with no options would have done the same as halt -f of modern SysVinit does, i.e. a brutal, immediate kernel shutdown without stopping any services or unmounting filesystems.



For the same reason, being used to the Linux killall command can be dangerous on other Unixes. Its man page even has this ominous warning:




Be warned that typing killall name may not have the desired effect on non-Linux systems, especially when done by a privileged user.




This is because the classic SystemV killall was one of those commands designed to be used only as part of a shutdown script. In Linux distributions with SysVinit, the classic version of the command may be found as killall5. It literally kills all processes except kernel threads and processes in its own session: its intended use is in a shutdown script after shutting down all services, just before unmounting the local filesystems, to kill of any other processes that might delay or prevent the unmounting.



(How I know this, you ask? Well, I once made the mistake of running killall <something> as root on a Solaris 2.6 system. A very effective learning experience.)






share|improve this answer















Debian



When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff.



Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.



RHEL/CentOS



RHEL/CentOS 5 was the last version to use SysVinit: version 6 used upstart and version 7 uses systemd. In RHEL 5.11, the last script to run when transitioning to runlevel 0 is /etc/init.d/halt, and its last lines are:



[ "$INIT_HALT" != "HALT" ] && HALTARGS="$HALTARGS -p"

exec $command $HALTARGS


Since the same script is also run at the end of transition to runlevel 6 (reboot), the actual command to run is defined by the variable $command, and it will be either /sbin/halt or /sbin/reboot. According to the value of the $INIT_HALT variable, the script will decide whether or not add the -p option. That variable is set by /sbin/shutdown. The RHEL 5.11 shutdown(8) man page says:




HALT OR POWEROFF



The -H option just sets the init environment variable INIT_HALT to HALT, and the -P option just sets that variable to POWEROFF. The shutdown script that calls halt(8) as the last thing in the shutdown sequence should check these environment variables and call halt(8) with the right options for these options to actually have any effect.
Debian 3.1 (sarge) supports this.




(Yes, the RHEL 5.11 man page mentions Debian 3.1! I guess someone at RedHat porting patches from various sources to RHEL missed one reference...)



It looks like RedHat has decided to code the above-mentioned test in the /etc/init.d/halt script in such a way that switching off the power (using /sbin/halt -p at the end of shutdown) is the default halt action: the only way to achieve halt without poweroff is to use the upper-case -H option of the shutdown command to explicitly request it, e.g. shutdown -hH now



But again, the default powerdown is triggered by the runlevel scripts customized by the Linux distribution, so it's not really a feature of the SysVinit halt command.



Historical note



Old SysVinit-using systems (both Linux and non) used to have several commands that were not intended to be used directly, but only as part of the appropriate shutdown/reboot scripts. Before SysVinit 2.74, the /sbin/halt command with no options would have done the same as halt -f of modern SysVinit does, i.e. a brutal, immediate kernel shutdown without stopping any services or unmounting filesystems.



For the same reason, being used to the Linux killall command can be dangerous on other Unixes. Its man page even has this ominous warning:




Be warned that typing killall name may not have the desired effect on non-Linux systems, especially when done by a privileged user.




This is because the classic SystemV killall was one of those commands designed to be used only as part of a shutdown script. In Linux distributions with SysVinit, the classic version of the command may be found as killall5. It literally kills all processes except kernel threads and processes in its own session: its intended use is in a shutdown script after shutting down all services, just before unmounting the local filesystems, to kill of any other processes that might delay or prevent the unmounting.



(How I know this, you ask? Well, I once made the mistake of running killall <something> as root on a Solaris 2.6 system. A very effective learning experience.)







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited 6 hours ago

























answered 7 hours ago









telcoMtelcoM

19.3k12448




19.3k12448












  • Yes that is what I am expecting! Very nice informations! Thank you a lot, specially about the notes about Red Hat doing the same behavior in older versions!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    5 hours ago


















  • Yes that is what I am expecting! Very nice informations! Thank you a lot, specially about the notes about Red Hat doing the same behavior in older versions!

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    5 hours ago

















Yes that is what I am expecting! Very nice informations! Thank you a lot, specially about the notes about Red Hat doing the same behavior in older versions!

– Luciano Andress Martini
5 hours ago






Yes that is what I am expecting! Very nice informations! Thank you a lot, specially about the notes about Red Hat doing the same behavior in older versions!

– Luciano Andress Martini
5 hours ago














4














This question is predicated upon multiple falsehoods.



One did not use halt to turn off one's computer, and this has not changed with systemd.



halt a.k.a. haltsys shuts down and halts. poweroff is a newer command that shuts down and powers off. (https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/196471/5132 explains the subtleties of this which I am going to gloss over here, since the question is only about Linux operating systems. This answer focuses on just the AT&T System 5 UNIX side of the universe.)



As I explained at https://superuser.com/a/900205/38062, computers are not necessarily able to power off under software control. The action of the haltsys and halt command has conventionally been to shutdown and halt the machine, the next action being the operator using a physical reset button or power switch.



halt gained a -p/--poweroff option to make it equivalent to poweroff, but this is symptomatic of a general growth of overlapping and self-contradictory options to these commands. Witness the manual page for the Upstart halt command in Debian 7. There's halt --poweroff there. The manual page for the van Smoorenburg halt command in Debian 7 similarly has halt -p.



But this is not something that has changed with systemd. systemd provides the same. The systemd halt command also has --poweroff. It furthermore has --reboot and (for good measure) --halt options.



I had to do the same with the halt/haltsys command in the nosh toolset, for compatibility.



You may erroneously think that plain old halt powered off your computer. But that was unequivocally wrong for Upstart, and only true for the van Smoorenburg toolset if you happened to hit a bug.



The bug, which has only this year finally been fixed, was that the van Smoorenburg halt command would simply ignore the presence or absence of the -p option and instead decide whether to halt or power off according to the value of a setting in /etc/default/halt. If you happened to have that setting set to power off, then halt would always power off, even if no -p option were supplied. Conversely, if you happened to have that setting set to halt, then halt would always halt, even if a -p option were supplied.



But this was a bug, not the documented nor intended behaviour, not the behaviour of every halt command that was available on Debian, and not the conventional behaviour of the halt command in general.



Further reading



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018-12-07). Bug#586709: closed by Thomas Goirand. Debian bug #586709.

  • Jessie Smith (2019-03-08). initscripts: command halt unintended changed behaviour. Debian bug #743555.





share|improve this answer























  • A falsehood that running apt install sysvinit-core turned true! Why? I just installed sysvinit, and at end halt says "Will now halt" exactly in that moment the machine powered off, how could this be a falsehood, it looks like the developer of sysvinit still has this falsehood! and plus that halt -f turns off the machine immediately.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    11 hours ago







  • 1





    When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff. Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.

    – telcoM
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @telcoM Thank you very much for this! That is enough for me, if you put that as a answer I will mark it as the correct answer. (Note one thing (not very important), CentOS seems to have the same behavior in my old servers). Can you post this as a answer please?

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    8 hours ago
















4














This question is predicated upon multiple falsehoods.



One did not use halt to turn off one's computer, and this has not changed with systemd.



halt a.k.a. haltsys shuts down and halts. poweroff is a newer command that shuts down and powers off. (https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/196471/5132 explains the subtleties of this which I am going to gloss over here, since the question is only about Linux operating systems. This answer focuses on just the AT&T System 5 UNIX side of the universe.)



As I explained at https://superuser.com/a/900205/38062, computers are not necessarily able to power off under software control. The action of the haltsys and halt command has conventionally been to shutdown and halt the machine, the next action being the operator using a physical reset button or power switch.



halt gained a -p/--poweroff option to make it equivalent to poweroff, but this is symptomatic of a general growth of overlapping and self-contradictory options to these commands. Witness the manual page for the Upstart halt command in Debian 7. There's halt --poweroff there. The manual page for the van Smoorenburg halt command in Debian 7 similarly has halt -p.



But this is not something that has changed with systemd. systemd provides the same. The systemd halt command also has --poweroff. It furthermore has --reboot and (for good measure) --halt options.



I had to do the same with the halt/haltsys command in the nosh toolset, for compatibility.



You may erroneously think that plain old halt powered off your computer. But that was unequivocally wrong for Upstart, and only true for the van Smoorenburg toolset if you happened to hit a bug.



The bug, which has only this year finally been fixed, was that the van Smoorenburg halt command would simply ignore the presence or absence of the -p option and instead decide whether to halt or power off according to the value of a setting in /etc/default/halt. If you happened to have that setting set to power off, then halt would always power off, even if no -p option were supplied. Conversely, if you happened to have that setting set to halt, then halt would always halt, even if a -p option were supplied.



But this was a bug, not the documented nor intended behaviour, not the behaviour of every halt command that was available on Debian, and not the conventional behaviour of the halt command in general.



Further reading



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018-12-07). Bug#586709: closed by Thomas Goirand. Debian bug #586709.

  • Jessie Smith (2019-03-08). initscripts: command halt unintended changed behaviour. Debian bug #743555.





share|improve this answer























  • A falsehood that running apt install sysvinit-core turned true! Why? I just installed sysvinit, and at end halt says "Will now halt" exactly in that moment the machine powered off, how could this be a falsehood, it looks like the developer of sysvinit still has this falsehood! and plus that halt -f turns off the machine immediately.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    11 hours ago







  • 1





    When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff. Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.

    – telcoM
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @telcoM Thank you very much for this! That is enough for me, if you put that as a answer I will mark it as the correct answer. (Note one thing (not very important), CentOS seems to have the same behavior in my old servers). Can you post this as a answer please?

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    8 hours ago














4












4








4







This question is predicated upon multiple falsehoods.



One did not use halt to turn off one's computer, and this has not changed with systemd.



halt a.k.a. haltsys shuts down and halts. poweroff is a newer command that shuts down and powers off. (https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/196471/5132 explains the subtleties of this which I am going to gloss over here, since the question is only about Linux operating systems. This answer focuses on just the AT&T System 5 UNIX side of the universe.)



As I explained at https://superuser.com/a/900205/38062, computers are not necessarily able to power off under software control. The action of the haltsys and halt command has conventionally been to shutdown and halt the machine, the next action being the operator using a physical reset button or power switch.



halt gained a -p/--poweroff option to make it equivalent to poweroff, but this is symptomatic of a general growth of overlapping and self-contradictory options to these commands. Witness the manual page for the Upstart halt command in Debian 7. There's halt --poweroff there. The manual page for the van Smoorenburg halt command in Debian 7 similarly has halt -p.



But this is not something that has changed with systemd. systemd provides the same. The systemd halt command also has --poweroff. It furthermore has --reboot and (for good measure) --halt options.



I had to do the same with the halt/haltsys command in the nosh toolset, for compatibility.



You may erroneously think that plain old halt powered off your computer. But that was unequivocally wrong for Upstart, and only true for the van Smoorenburg toolset if you happened to hit a bug.



The bug, which has only this year finally been fixed, was that the van Smoorenburg halt command would simply ignore the presence or absence of the -p option and instead decide whether to halt or power off according to the value of a setting in /etc/default/halt. If you happened to have that setting set to power off, then halt would always power off, even if no -p option were supplied. Conversely, if you happened to have that setting set to halt, then halt would always halt, even if a -p option were supplied.



But this was a bug, not the documented nor intended behaviour, not the behaviour of every halt command that was available on Debian, and not the conventional behaviour of the halt command in general.



Further reading



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018-12-07). Bug#586709: closed by Thomas Goirand. Debian bug #586709.

  • Jessie Smith (2019-03-08). initscripts: command halt unintended changed behaviour. Debian bug #743555.





share|improve this answer













This question is predicated upon multiple falsehoods.



One did not use halt to turn off one's computer, and this has not changed with systemd.



halt a.k.a. haltsys shuts down and halts. poweroff is a newer command that shuts down and powers off. (https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/196471/5132 explains the subtleties of this which I am going to gloss over here, since the question is only about Linux operating systems. This answer focuses on just the AT&T System 5 UNIX side of the universe.)



As I explained at https://superuser.com/a/900205/38062, computers are not necessarily able to power off under software control. The action of the haltsys and halt command has conventionally been to shutdown and halt the machine, the next action being the operator using a physical reset button or power switch.



halt gained a -p/--poweroff option to make it equivalent to poweroff, but this is symptomatic of a general growth of overlapping and self-contradictory options to these commands. Witness the manual page for the Upstart halt command in Debian 7. There's halt --poweroff there. The manual page for the van Smoorenburg halt command in Debian 7 similarly has halt -p.



But this is not something that has changed with systemd. systemd provides the same. The systemd halt command also has --poweroff. It furthermore has --reboot and (for good measure) --halt options.



I had to do the same with the halt/haltsys command in the nosh toolset, for compatibility.



You may erroneously think that plain old halt powered off your computer. But that was unequivocally wrong for Upstart, and only true for the van Smoorenburg toolset if you happened to hit a bug.



The bug, which has only this year finally been fixed, was that the van Smoorenburg halt command would simply ignore the presence or absence of the -p option and instead decide whether to halt or power off according to the value of a setting in /etc/default/halt. If you happened to have that setting set to power off, then halt would always power off, even if no -p option were supplied. Conversely, if you happened to have that setting set to halt, then halt would always halt, even if a -p option were supplied.



But this was a bug, not the documented nor intended behaviour, not the behaviour of every halt command that was available on Debian, and not the conventional behaviour of the halt command in general.



Further reading



  • Jonathan de Boyne Pollard (2018-12-07). Bug#586709: closed by Thomas Goirand. Debian bug #586709.

  • Jessie Smith (2019-03-08). initscripts: command halt unintended changed behaviour. Debian bug #743555.






share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered Mar 15 at 1:16









JdeBPJdeBP

37.2k476177




37.2k476177












  • A falsehood that running apt install sysvinit-core turned true! Why? I just installed sysvinit, and at end halt says "Will now halt" exactly in that moment the machine powered off, how could this be a falsehood, it looks like the developer of sysvinit still has this falsehood! and plus that halt -f turns off the machine immediately.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    11 hours ago







  • 1





    When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff. Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.

    – telcoM
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @telcoM Thank you very much for this! That is enough for me, if you put that as a answer I will mark it as the correct answer. (Note one thing (not very important), CentOS seems to have the same behavior in my old servers). Can you post this as a answer please?

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    8 hours ago


















  • A falsehood that running apt install sysvinit-core turned true! Why? I just installed sysvinit, and at end halt says "Will now halt" exactly in that moment the machine powered off, how could this be a falsehood, it looks like the developer of sysvinit still has this falsehood! and plus that halt -f turns off the machine immediately.

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    11 hours ago







  • 1





    When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff. Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.

    – telcoM
    10 hours ago






  • 1





    @telcoM Thank you very much for this! That is enough for me, if you put that as a answer I will mark it as the correct answer. (Note one thing (not very important), CentOS seems to have the same behavior in my old servers). Can you post this as a answer please?

    – Luciano Andress Martini
    8 hours ago

















A falsehood that running apt install sysvinit-core turned true! Why? I just installed sysvinit, and at end halt says "Will now halt" exactly in that moment the machine powered off, how could this be a falsehood, it looks like the developer of sysvinit still has this falsehood! and plus that halt -f turns off the machine immediately.

– Luciano Andress Martini
11 hours ago






A falsehood that running apt install sysvinit-core turned true! Why? I just installed sysvinit, and at end halt says "Will now halt" exactly in that moment the machine powered off, how could this be a falsehood, it looks like the developer of sysvinit still has this falsehood! and plus that halt -f turns off the machine immediately.

– Luciano Andress Martini
11 hours ago





1




1





When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff. Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.

– telcoM
10 hours ago





When using SysVinit in Debian(esque) systems, /etc/defaults/halt includes a variable that defines whether the system will run halt or poweroff at the end of transition to runlevel 0. The default setting is HALT=poweroff. Before SysVinit 2.74 you were not supposed to run halt directly, and starting from that version, the SysVinit halt command will just call shutdown -h unless the current runlevel is 0 or 6. This is documented in halt(8) man page. At the end of transition to runlevel 0 the runlevel scripts will run $HALT, which is equal to poweroff by default.

– telcoM
10 hours ago




1




1





@telcoM Thank you very much for this! That is enough for me, if you put that as a answer I will mark it as the correct answer. (Note one thing (not very important), CentOS seems to have the same behavior in my old servers). Can you post this as a answer please?

– Luciano Andress Martini
8 hours ago






@telcoM Thank you very much for this! That is enough for me, if you put that as a answer I will mark it as the correct answer. (Note one thing (not very important), CentOS seems to have the same behavior in my old servers). Can you post this as a answer please?

– Luciano Andress Martini
8 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Unix & Linux Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2funix.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f506341%2fdebian-9-halt-does-not-really-power-off-in-new-versions-why%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

Àrd-bhaile Cathair chruinne/Baile mòr cruinne | Artagailean ceangailte | Clàr-taice na seòladaireachd

대한민국 목차 국명 지리 역사 정치 국방 경제 사회 문화 국제 순위 관련 항목 각주 외부 링크 둘러보기 메뉴북위 37° 34′ 08″ 동경 126° 58′ 36″ / 북위 37.568889° 동경 126.976667°  / 37.568889; 126.976667ehThe Korean Repository문단을 편집문단을 편집추가해Clarkson PLC 사Report for Selected Countries and Subjects-Korea“Human Development Index and its components: P.198”“http://www.law.go.kr/%EB%B2%95%EB%A0%B9/%EB%8C%80%ED%95%9C%EB%AF%BC%EA%B5%AD%EA%B5%AD%EA%B8%B0%EB%B2%95”"한국은 국제법상 한반도 유일 합법정부 아니다" - 오마이뉴스 모바일Report for Selected Countries and Subjects: South Korea격동의 역사와 함께한 조선일보 90년 : 조선일보 인수해 혁신시킨 신석우, 임시정부 때는 '대한민국' 국호(國號) 정해《우리가 몰랐던 우리 역사: 나라 이름의 비밀을 찾아가는 역사 여행》“남북 공식호칭 ‘남한’‘북한’으로 쓴다”“Corea 대 Korea, 누가 이긴 거야?”국내기후자료 - 한국[김대중 前 대통령 서거] 과감한 구조개혁 'DJ노믹스'로 최단기간 환란극복 :: 네이버 뉴스“이라크 "韓-쿠르드 유전개발 MOU 승인 안해"(종합)”“해외 우리국민 추방사례 43%가 일본”차기전차 K2'흑표'의 세계 최고 전력 분석, 쿠키뉴스 엄기영, 2007-03-02두산인프라, 헬기잡는 장갑차 'K21'...내년부터 공급, 고뉴스 이대준, 2008-10-30과거 내용 찾기mk 뉴스 - 구매력 기준으로 보면 한국 1인당 소득 3만弗과거 내용 찾기"The N-11: More Than an Acronym"Archived조선일보 최우석, 2008-11-01Global 500 2008: Countries - South Korea“몇년째 '시한폭탄'... 가계부채, 올해는 터질까”가구당 부채 5000만원 처음 넘어서“‘빚’으로 내몰리는 사회.. 위기의 가계대출”“[경제365] 공공부문 부채 급증…800조 육박”“"소득 양극화 다소 완화...불평등은 여전"”“공정사회·공생발전 한참 멀었네”iSuppli,08年2QのDRAMシェア・ランキングを発表(08/8/11)South Korea dominates shipbuilding industry | Stock Market News & Stocks to Watch from StraightStocks한국 자동차 생산, 3년 연속 세계 5위자동차수출 '현대-삼성 웃고 기아-대우-쌍용은 울고' 과거 내용 찾기동반성장위 창립 1주년 맞아Archived"중기적합 3개업종 합의 무시한 채 선정"李대통령, 사업 무분별 확장 소상공인 생계 위협 질타삼성-LG, 서민업종인 빵·분식사업 잇따라 철수상생은 뒷전…SSM ‘몸집 불리기’ 혈안Archived“경부고속도에 '아시안하이웨이' 표지판”'철의 실크로드' 앞서 '말(言)의 실크로드'부터, 프레시안 정창현, 2008-10-01“'서울 지하철은 안전한가?'”“서울시 “올해 안에 모든 지하철역 스크린도어 설치””“부산지하철 1,2호선 승강장 안전펜스 설치 완료”“전교조, 정부 노조 통계서 처음 빠져”“[Weekly BIZ] 도요타 '제로 이사회'가 리콜 사태 불러들였다”“S Korea slams high tuition costs”““정치가 여론 양극화 부채질… 합리주의 절실””“〈"`촛불집회'는 민주주의의 질적 변화 상징"〉”““촛불집회가 민주주의 왜곡 초래””“국민 65%, "한국 노사관계 대립적"”“한국 국가경쟁력 27위‥노사관계 '꼴찌'”“제대로 형성되지 않은 대한민국 이념지형”“[신년기획-갈등의 시대] 갈등지수 OECD 4위…사회적 손실 GDP 27% 무려 300조”“2012 총선-대선의 키워드는 '국민과 소통'”“한국 삶의 질 27위, 2000년과 2008년 연속 하위권 머물러”“[해피 코리아] 행복점수 68점…해외 평가선 '낙제점'”“한국 어린이·청소년 행복지수 3년 연속 OECD ‘꼴찌’”“한국 이혼율 OECD중 8위”“[통계청] 한국 이혼율 OECD 4위”“오피니언 [이렇게 생각한다] `부부의 날` 에 돌아본 이혼율 1위 한국”“Suicide Rates by Country, Global Health Observatory Data Repository.”“1. 또 다른 차별”“오피니언 [편집자에게] '왕따'와 '패거리 정치' 심리는 닮은꼴”“[미래한국리포트] 무한경쟁에 빠진 대한민국”“대학생 98% "외모가 경쟁력이라는 말 동의"”“특급호텔 웨딩·200만원대 유모차… "남보다 더…" 호화病, 고질병 됐다”“[스트레스 공화국] ① 경쟁사회, 스트레스 쌓인다”““매일 30여명 자살 한국, 의사보다 무속인에…””“"자살 부르는 '우울증', 환자 중 85% 치료 안 받아"”“정신병원을 가다”“대한민국도 ‘묻지마 범죄’,안전지대 아니다”“유엔 "학생 '성적 지향'에 따른 차별 금지하라"”“유엔아동권리위원회 보고서 및 번역본 원문”“고졸 성공스토리 담은 '제빵왕 김탁구' 드라마 나온다”“‘빛 좋은 개살구’ 고졸 취업…실습 대신 착취”원본 문서“정신건강, 사회적 편견부터 고쳐드립니다”‘소통’과 ‘행복’에 목 마른 사회가 잠들어 있던 ‘심리학’ 깨웠다“[포토] 사유리-곽금주 교수의 유쾌한 심리상담”“"올해 한국인 평균 영화관람횟수 세계 1위"(종합)”“[게임연중기획] 게임은 문화다-여가활동 1순위 게임”“영화속 ‘영어 지상주의’ …“왠지 씁쓸한데””“2월 `신문 부수 인증기관` 지정..방송법 후속작업”“무료신문 성장동력 ‘차별성’과 ‘갈등해소’”대한민국 국회 법률지식정보시스템"Pew Research Center's Religion & Public Life Project: South Korea"“amp;vwcd=MT_ZTITLE&path=인구·가구%20>%20인구총조사%20>%20인구부문%20>%20 총조사인구(2005)%20>%20전수부문&oper_YN=Y&item=&keyword=종교별%20인구& amp;lang_mode=kor&list_id= 2005년 통계청 인구 총조사”원본 문서“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2009)”“한국인이 좋아하는 취미와 운동 (2004-2014)”Archived“한국, `부분적 언론자유국' 강등〈프리덤하우스〉”“국경없는기자회 "한국, 인터넷감시 대상국"”“한국, 조선산업 1위 유지(S. Korea Stays Top Shipbuilding Nation) RZD-Partner Portal”원본 문서“한국, 4년 만에 ‘선박건조 1위’”“옛 마산시,인터넷속도 세계 1위”“"한국 초고속 인터넷망 세계1위"”“인터넷·휴대폰 요금, 외국보다 훨씬 비싸”“한국 관세행정 6년 연속 세계 '1위'”“한국 교통사고 사망자 수 OECD 회원국 중 2위”“결핵 후진국' 한국, 환자가 급증한 이유는”“수술은 신중해야… 자칫하면 생명 위협”대한민국분류대한민국의 지도대한민국 정부대표 다국어포털대한민국 전자정부대한민국 국회한국방송공사about korea and information korea브리태니커 백과사전(한국편)론리플래닛의 정보(한국편)CIA의 세계 정보(한국편)마리암 부디아 (Mariam Budia),『한국: 하늘이 내린 한 폭의 그림』, 서울: 트랜스라틴 19호 (2012년 3월)대한민국ehehehehehehehehehehehehehehWorldCat132441370n791268020000 0001 2308 81034078029-6026373548cb11863345f(데이터)00573706ge128495

Cannot Extend partition with GParted The 2019 Stack Overflow Developer Survey Results Are In Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) 2019 Community Moderator Election ResultsCan't increase partition size with GParted?GParted doesn't recognize the unallocated space after my current partitionWhat is the best way to add unallocated space located before to Ubuntu 12.04 partition with GParted live?I can't figure out how to extend my Arch home partition into free spaceGparted Linux Mint 18.1 issueTrying to extend but swap partition is showing as Unknown in Gparted, shows proper from fdiskRearrange partitions in gparted to extend a partitionUnable to extend partition even though unallocated space is next to it using GPartedAllocate free space to root partitiongparted: how to merge unallocated space with a partition